`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
` Entered: February 26, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`TRW AUTOMOTIVE US LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Cases
`IPR2015-01429
`IPR2015-01430
`IPR2015-014311
`Patent 8,692,659 B2
`_______________
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Termination of the Proceeding
`37 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`
`1 We use this caption to indicate that this Decision applies to, and is entered
`in, each case. The parties are not authorized to use this caption.
`
`Before PHILLIP J. KAUFFMAN, BARRY L. GROSSMAN, and
`ROBERT J. WEINSCHENK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KAUFFMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01429
`IPR2015-01430
`IPR2015-01431
`Patent 8,692,659 B2
`
`
`Pursuant to authorization by the Board, TRW Automotive U.S. LLC
`(“Petitioner”) and Magna Electronics, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) filed a Joint Motion to
`Terminate, (Paper 9 (“Joint Motion”)), jointly requesting termination of this inter
`partes review proceeding and that we treat as “business confidential” the submitted
`settlement agreement (Ex. 1022 (“Settlement Agreement”)).2
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), an inter partes review proceeding shall be
`terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner
`and the patent owner, unless the Patent and Trademark Office has decided the
`merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed. The Board has
`not decided the merits of this case. Thus, this proceeding is eligible for
`termination. Furthermore, under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[i]f no petitioner remains in
`the inter partes review, the Office may terminate the review or proceed to a final
`written decision under section 318(a).” Petitioner is the sole petitioner in this
`review. The Board has discretion to terminate this review with respect to Patent
`Owner.
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b), any agreement or understanding between the
`Patent Owner and a Petitioner, including any collateral agreements referred to in
`such agreement or understanding, made in connection with, or in contemplation of,
`the termination of the proceeding shall be in writing, and a true copy of such
`agreement or understanding shall be filed in the Office. Patent Owner and
`Petitioner state in the Joint Motion that the parties have agreed to settle their
`dispute and have reached a written agreement to terminate this proceeding. Joint
`
`
`2 Unless otherwise stated, we reference the papers and exhibits of IPR2015-01429.
`The other proceedings contain similar fillings.
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01429
`IPR2015-01430
`IPR2015-01431
`Patent 8,692,659 B2
`
`Motion 2. In support of the Joint Motion, the parties submitted Exhibit 1022 as
`evidence of their agreement. The parties also represent that Exhibit 1022 is a true
`and correct copy of the agreement and is filed in accordance with 35 U.S.C.
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), and thus represent that there are no collateral
`agreements or understandings in connection with, or in contemplation of, the
`termination of this proceeding. Id.
`Upon consideration of the facts in the case before us, we grant the Joint
`Motion and terminate this proceeding as to both Petitioner and Patent Owner
`without rendering a final written decision. 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. We also grant the
`Joint Request to maintain Exhibit 1023 as business confidential in accordance with
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`
`ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate this proceeding is granted
`and, accordingly, this proceeding is hereby terminated; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Request that the agreement
`(Ex. 1022) submitted in support of the Joint Motion be treated as business
`confidential information, to be kept separate from the file of U.S. Patent No.
`8,531,278 B2, and made available only under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is granted.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01429
`IPR2015-01430
`IPR2015-01431
`Patent 8,692,659 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Timothy K. Sendek
`Allan Sternstein
`A. Justin Poplin
`Dan Cleveland Jr.
`LATHROP & GAGE LLP
`TSendek@lathropgage.com
`patent@lathropgage.com
`JPoplin@lathropgage.com
`dcleveland@lathropgage.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`David K.S. Cornwell
`Mark W. Rygiel
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`davidc-PTAB@skgf.com
`mrygiel-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Timothy A. Flory
`Terence J. Linn
`GARDNER, LINN, BURKHART & FLORY, LLP
`Flory@glbf.com
`linn@glbf.com
`
`
`
`4