throbber
Edited by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`jar.-os Fischer and C. Rob.-"n Car.-eflin
`
`
`
`
`Analogue-based Drug Discovery ll
`
`
`
`
`
`WILEY-
`
`VCH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WILEY-VCH Verlag C.mbH 8; Co. KGaA
`
`Page 1 of 28
`
`Astraleneca Exhibit 2262
`
`Mylan v. Astraleneca
`IPR2015-01340
`
`Page 1 of 28
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2262
`Mylan v. AstraZeneca
`IPR2015-01340
`
`

`
`Al] books publisllcd by Wilt-_\'-\«'(IH are carefillly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`]'.|10dl.lI.'1’d. !~:ewr1!Jc'h-15. illlthols rdiioréa and
`
`
`
`
`
`publisher dn nu! w:m:mI tlw In|i)n11.1Iiun LrJul.nnrI.l
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in thesr |xHJks.1IIt.|IIdi|:g!|:n-. hn-at as be frer nl
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`errors. Rt".ldl'l"'- an‘ .In1\-used to kw.-p 111 mind that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sl3'It'3'lli.'1'11..~'. dam. i1|Il!iIfJ!itIl:5. pmcodural dclailu or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ulhcr |1¢*n1-5 111:3‘ lI1.'|d\‘I.'1"tt"III|_\' be inatulralr.-.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Library ofcongress Clfd No.:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.11.'IphL-d ior
`
`
`
`
`British Library Cataloguing-in-Puhiicalinn Data
`
`
`
`
`A ('.1.I:l|0QtI\' rt-mrd In: this houk us available Irum tllc
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`British iihrary.
`
`
`
`BiIrliograp|1iciIIfotn1al.inn published by
`
`
`
`
`Ihe Delllsclle NI‘IioIIi||I'HiotI|elr
`
`
`
`The Dnllsdlv Natlanulllilaliolhn-k heats this
`
`
`
`
`publicmluul In tllru Dvulr-dw Naiaonnlbibling-nfie;
`
`
`
`
`
`dmaill-d |:i|1!1ugr.':phIc data .'m- available an the’.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lIl|l‘lIl(‘1 at I1!l|r,rfdiIlI.d-Illmdx-.
`
`
`
`I
`20111 Wll FY-V('.|'l Vi-rlag CmbH 8: Co. KCaA.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wvmhnrl m
`
`
`
`
`MI rIg}1tsrv.\t'rvrd lIm'lm!:'ng Lllum: oftrallslntion inln
`
`
`
`
`
`nthrl iullpgxxugu-sq. Nu pan nfthu bank may be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`r\'f|rDdlIu’d In ulur Ilmn — by phcnzuprinfing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nlmafthu. or am nth:-r rm-ans — nor tmnsmilled ur
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tr.'ilI-.~i|Il1l'.'l.l ink) u r!'IilthiIIl' language without wrlttcrl
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prmnssmn from Hlr puhllslu-rs. Registered |1.1m(-ea.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Iradvnurks. ("IL LL-wd Ill this back. even when nnl
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`~:p¢-c:fiual|_\' maslu-d as mth. am not to be c'at1s:du-mi
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`unpro!PI,'I¢-d In" law.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cover Design AsJ'ar:1 Drslgn. \l."uinhemI
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Typesathirlg T'huI'n:¢on Dxgilal. Haida. India
`
`
`
`
`
`Printing and Binding
`Strauss {]mbH. .\1'c1r1rnIJ:u'|:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Frmlt-d III the F:'(h'r.1l Rcpubltc :1-fficrmaluy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pruitt-d on atid-[kw paper
`
`
`
`
`ISIN: ‘il?8- 1-32 73-32 1'}-W»3
`
`
`
`T|IeEditots
`
`
`
`Prof Dnjdna-s Fimchtr
`
`
`
`
`Iii-(I119: Plc
`
`
`Gyfimnii: ul NI
`
`
`1105 Budapest
`
`Hungary
`
`
`
`
`
`Pro)’. Dr. C. Rabin Gum!!!»
`
`
`
`
`
`Unive-rsily College lnrldcm
`
`
`Dl.‘[}IlTIl'Tll.’I1IDrcllfllltifilfy
`
`
`20 Cufdflll Slrcel
`
`
`
`Lilndon VICE H CAI
`
`
`
`
`Llnilrd Kingdom
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Suppanzd by
`
`
`
`Thr Imemauonai Lmon cu!" Pure and Applied
`
`
`
`
`Chem isrry {I U PACJ
`
`
`Chflni5lnr' and Human Hralth Dc\'i5io1I
`
`
`
`
`
`PO Box 1335?’
`
`
`
`Research Triangle Park. NC £??TI‘J-H5?
`
`
`
`
`
`USA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 28
`
`Page 2 of 28
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ipeptidyl Peptidase IV Inhibitors for the Treatment of Type 2
`
`Diabetes
`
`5 D
`
`
`
`
`
`
`jens-Uwe Peters and Patrizio Mattsi
`
`5.1
`
`Introduction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The symptoms of diabetes mellitus, a metabolic disorder characterized by hyper~
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`glycemia {abnormally high blood glucose} due to inadequate irlsuliil levels. have been
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`described since antiquity. The intrnductimi of insulin replacement therapy for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`diabetes in 1922 was :1 major feat in the history of medicine and was awarded with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the Nobel Prize in medicine in the following year. Later in the 19205. the firs! oral
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`antidiabetic drugs [OADs} were introduced. Although they were imperfect and later
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`withdrawn, they led to the recognition that two types 0fdi3l3€‘l'lC‘5 exist — the invenile
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`type. 1'equi_ring insulin therapy. and the late-onset type, which also benefits from OAD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`treatment [1, 2]. The late—onset form. today known as type 2 diabetes, accounts for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`more than 90% of all diabetic patients and affects about 4% of the world
`
`
`population [3].
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The treatment oftype 2 diabetes aims to normalize blood glucose levels by diet.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`exercise. and medication, and is monitorecl by measuring glycosyiated hemoglobin
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`{HbA.L.} as a long~term marker of elevated blood glucose. The amount of Hl)A.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`refiects the average glucose level over the last 120 days {the life span ofred blood cells]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and should be maintained below 7% {4]. Each percentage reduction in HbA ._ leads to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a 21% reduction of the risk for any diabetes-related end point {S}. Poorly controlled.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`chronic h)'perglyceInia causes microvascular damage. which affects organs with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`delicate capillary systems such as the eyes and kidneys, and can lead to blindness and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`renal failure.
`[:1 addition. hyperglycemia leads to atherosclerosis of larger vessels.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`which increases the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. An important compli-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cation resulting frmn micro— and niacroangiopatliy are lesions of the lower limbs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`("diabetic foot") that may ultimately require amputation. Utiiortilriately. the tnaiurity
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ofdiabetic patterns do not reach recommended HbAh. levels and are therefore at risk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of" developing, these disabling comorbidities. Furthermore. the prevalence of type 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`diabetes has increased over recent years. mainly due to higher life expectancies and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`an increasing prevulerice ofobesity [3]. Several classes oi‘OADs have been introduced
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`into clinical practice since Lhe 1950s and are widely pI‘esr.‘I‘ibecl. However‘, they all
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`come along with side effects such as hypoglvceniia, weight gain. or gastroiritestinal
`
`.|ntl (,'. ROIIIII C-.m('ilIII
`l'):s.a.-wt} H Edited lJ\' lfultrrs I-'I.t-rlwl
`-\r1;tli~pm'-i.Ictm.l Dni-3:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tfurptrigiit
`\\-‘\'IItit1'!nt
`'' 1tIlt'|\.\'|l.i-"I"\r'CH Verlag Cmbtl 52 Cu KGJA.
`
`
`
`
`ISRN '}'."R-1-527-129-fllvfl
`
`
`Page 3 of 28
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 28
`
`

`
`110
`
`
`
`5 Dipeptidyl Peptidase lV lnl1ibitor5 for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`problems. Moreover. they often fail to achieve sustained glycemic control. Thus. there
`is a critical unmet need for 0.405 with novel modes of action.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the late 1980s. several research groups could Show that the peptidic hormone
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GLP-l (glucagon~|ii(e peptide 1]. vvhicli
`is secreted by the I-cells of the intestinal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`epithelium in response to loud ingestion. is a potent stiniulator oufglucose-dependent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`insulin release. This finding raised hopes that exogenous (3Ll"—] might be used to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stimulate the impaired insulin secretion in type 2 diabetic patients. Disappointingiy.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`single subcutaneous iniections of GLP-I were ineffective in normalizing blood
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`glucose [6]. A few years later.
`it was discovered that DPP-IV [-dipeptidyl peptidase
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I V}. a serine protease first isolated in 1966. rapidly cleaves and inactivates GLP-1 [7].
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Several research groups recognized the implications ofthis finding:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inhibition of DPP-IV should prevent the rapid degradation of GLP-1 and should
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thus increase circulating G LP-I levels.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Increased GLP-1 levels should enhance glucose-depetiderlt insulin secretion.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`leading to lower blood glucose levels.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Consequently. DPP~lV inhibitors should have an antidia|)el:iL' effect.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The glucose-loweringfantidialietic effect of DPP-IV inhibitors was soon demon-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`strated in animals and httrnans and triggered enormous researc h activities tl'LrOugh-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`out the pharniaceutical industry in the first decade of the new millennium [8].
`
`5.2
`
`in Vitro Assays and Animal Models for the Assessment of DPP-IV Inhibitors
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The discovery of DPI’-[V inhibitors was facilitated by the availability of robust and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`high-throughput in uitro assays. which often rely on a simple chromogenic or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fluorogenic readout. For instance. DPP-IV cleaves Ala-Pro-AFC. a peptidyl derivative
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of 7-amirio-4-trifluorometliylcoumarin [AFC]. and the green fluorescence of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cleavage product. AFC. can be distinguished from the violet-blue Fluorescence of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate {Figure 5.1). The cleavage of Ala~Pro-AFC serves as a measure of DP P-[V
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`activity in an in vitro assay. in which the candidate inhibitor is evaluated by its ability to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`suppress the formation of fluorescent AFC. Furfitermora. animal models with high
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`relevance to the human disease state were available. For instance, the oral glucose
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tolerance test (0G'I'T} in diabetic rats measures the glucose excursion. or the insulin
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`response. after an oral ingestion ofa standardized at-noun t ofglucose. and is equivalent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to the OGTTused in the diagnosis ofcliabetes in liumans. The eilicaciousness ofDPP-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[V inhibitors can be evaluated in such an animal model by their ability to reduce the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`glucose excursion aller their adtni.nistrat1'ori prior to the glucose chailenge.
`
`
`
`5.3
`
`SI.Il:IslIate—Based DPP-N Inhibitors
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Speculations about the relevance of DPP-IV in the processing of bioactive peptides.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and its potential role .in diseases such as cancer and AI D8. might have provided much
`
`Page 4 of 28
`
`Page 4 of 28
`
`

`
`5.3 Substrate-Based DPP-W tiihibitors
`
`
`
`
`
`111
`
`
`
`
`HgNJfi-(lg / lalffip-.
`
`
`N
`
`
`H
`0
`Ala-Pro-AFC
`
`GF3
`
`o
`
`0
`
`
`
`
`
`CF3
`
`+ m
`
`
`
`H251
`
`o
`
`o
`
`o
`
`H2~J\r”?
`
`OH
`
`0 0
`Ala-Pro—0H
`
`
`
`AFC
`
`green fluorescent
`
`
`
`
`Figure 5.1 DPP-IV liberates AFC from its dipeptidyl derivative, Ala-Pro-AFC. The green
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fluorescence of the product is used as a readout in a DPP-IV inhibition assay.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ofthe impetus for DPP~lV inhibitor research in the 19805 [9]. At this time. the ACE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`inhibitor success story had just proven that substratebased design is a viable
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`approach to drug discovery. and it seems natural that this concept was also pursued
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in DPP-IV research. DPP-W is an endopeptidase that releases dipeptides from the N-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`terminus ofa wide variety ofpeptidic hormones. with a preference for prolinue at the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`penultimate position. This proline preference is pronounced in small substrates
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[such as Ala-Pro-AFC. Figure S.1),e-ven ifthe1argerpeptideGLP-1 {3(iamino acids} is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cleaved after an aianine [Figure 5.2}.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the early 1990s, several academic research groups disclosed dipeptide~|ike
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DPP-[V inhibitors. in which a pyrrolidine or a thiazolidine replaces the proliirie, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`an attached amino acid with a free amino group mimics the N-tE'l‘l1‘1lTlt_l5 ofa
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate peptide [Figure 5.3}. The scissile peptide bond was either omitted. as in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the prototypical DPP-IV inhibitor P32,v’98 [10]. or replaced by a functional group
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`designed to mimic the proteolytic transition state or to covalently bind to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`enzymes active site serine. For instance, prolineboronic acids such as 1 have been
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`designed as transition-state analogues and are reversible. slow-binding inhibitors
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with activities in the low nanomolar range 111]. Phosphonates such as 2 are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ir1'eversibleinhibitors. which form stable esters with DPPvlV's catalytically active
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`serine. However, these early types ofserine-interacting inhibitors did initially not
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`provide clear advantages over the noncovalent inhibitors, as they were too unstable,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`too unseiective. or did not show a substantially improved activity. Nevertheless.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the boronic acid dutogliptiu. a DP?-[V inhibitor discovered by Phenomix, has
`
`Haw‘ ® ®®@
`
`
`cleavage
`
`by DPF’-IV
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 5.2 DPP-IV cleaves GLP-"I at the penultimate position from the N—terminus.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 28
`
`Page 5 of 28
`
`

`
`112
`
`
`5 Dipeptidyl Peptidase W inl1i'bi£ors_fi3r the Trentirierit of Type 2 Drab.-ztcs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cs
`
`HQN
`
`0
`
`0
`
`B{0H)__.
`
`O
`
`PO(OPh)2
`
`F’32f98
`
`
`Kl: 123 nM
`
`
`
`Demuth at al.. 1991
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`IC:_.,[, = 20 nM
`
`Flentke et al., 1991
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`irreversible
`
`Powers et al., 1995
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5:
`
`F"
`N
`nfir ‘r
`0
`atom?
`
`>
`
`Dutogliptin
`
`
`IO“, : 25 nM
`
`
`Phenomix. 2005
`
`
`
`
`H N
`
`N
`
`0
`
`N
`
`
`
`3
`
`K: 2.2 nM
`
`
`
`Ferring. 1996
`
`
`
`
`Figure 5.3
`
`
`
`Early substrate-based E:-PP~|V inhibitors and dutogliptin.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`apparently overcome these lirniitations and entered phase 3 clinical development in
`20os[i2.13i
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In 1994. a publication demonstrated that nitriles could be used as serine-inter-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acting motifs in inhibitors: ofpirolyl endopepticlase {PEP}. a serine protease related to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DPP—lV [14]. So far, nitrilea had only been known to he cysteine protease il‘|l1ll)'li()l‘!-i.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`but were regarded unreactive to typical serine protease.-;. This surprising i'lt'ILli1‘lg
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prompted Sherwin Wilk's reSi?aI‘cl1 group at the City University of New York, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`researchers working with Paul D. Jenkins at Ferring Pliarmaceuticals. to introduce
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nitriles into their Sl.1l)Stl‘alI’;’-lJ£I:S€'d DPP-IV inhibitors [15-17]. These new Cyanop}-‘r-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`rolidine-type DPP-IV inl'lll'Jit0T'S. For example, 3 [Figure 5.3]. turned out to have an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`approxiiiiately I00-Fold improved inhibitoiy potency. and additionally both a good
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`selectivity profile and an acceptable chemical stability.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Up to this point.
`the role of DPP-[V in glucose homeostasis was not fully
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`recognized. Rolfhzientleiii et ill. from the University ofKiel had alreacly demonstrated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in 1993 that Gl.P-1 is a sulastmte of DPP-[V in vitro {7]. but this did not nec.e5sai‘ily
`
`mean that DPP-IV would be the main metabolic enzyme ol‘C LP-I in vi1ro.Ach.lal1y,3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`was proposed as a potential i1‘.nmunomodulator. as DPP—lV is identical to CD26, a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component of the T-cell receptor complex. In 1995. lens Holst and CUWOl'l~ZE’t'S from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the Univer.~_'-ity oi'CoperIhagen concluded from their studies that DPP-IV is respon-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sible. at least in part. For the obsewed rapid degradation OFGLP-I in humans and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`proposed that inhibition of‘DP'P-IV could be a useful adjunct in the management of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`type 2 diabetes [19]. Shortly tliereaiter. a collaborating team oi5ciei1I_ists workingwitli
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`l-lans;—Ul:'ich Demuth irorn the University oilialle and Ci1|'lS'(Opl‘tE't' H.S. Mclntosh
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and Ray A. Pederson from the University of British Columbia patented DPP-IV
`
`Page6of28
`
`Page 6 of 28
`
`

`
`5.3 SubstraIr—Bas£d DPPJV inhibitors
`
`
`
`
`
`‘H3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`inhibition as a method to tower blood glucose [£01. The patcnt applit::ttiI:'m was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`disclosed in 1997 and demonstrated that DPP-IV inhibition with l’32,t‘J8 did indeed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`improve glucose tolerance in rats. Demuth. wlto had spent most of his academic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`career working on DPP-W. would later start the biotech company. Prohioclrug. to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`exploit this invention and to bring P32,-'98 into the clinic. The imp1'0ven'tent in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`;__=,Iucosu.* tolerance by P32f98 was then reproduced in human Iioaltlty volttnteeI'-_-: and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`diabetic patients. P32,-‘98 and the epimcric allo-isoieucvl-tlriazolidiclc were licensed to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Merck in late 2000. However. development ofboth cornpouncls was Lliscorltinued in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`February 2001. after Merck had identified tmaccoptable toxicity profiles for both
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compounds. Later. insufficient sc-lectivity over the related dipeptidases D P P-8 and for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DFP-9 was postulated to be the reason for the observed toxicities [ll ]. At that time.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Merck had already identified Huoropyrrolidinte 4 [Figure 5.4} as 3 potential devel-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`opment compound. Because tho rationale for subtype selectivity was compelling. 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`was reiectecl on the basis of a selectivity of only S0-Fold over DPP-8 and DPP-‘J. and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`medicinal chemistry focused on l-ITS-based DPP-[V inhibitors. which culminated in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the discovery of sitagliptin {see Section 5.4). Furtlter exploration of the substrate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`analogue series provided 5. with a selectivity of ‘>10 000-fold over DI’?-819 [22]. This
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compourtd was brought forward as a backup for sitagliptin [23].
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Another potent and selective difluoropyrroiicline derivative. PF-00734200. has
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`been discovered by Pfizer. This compound was reported to be in phase 2 clinical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`studies in September 2008 [.24. 15}.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dtlri rig this time, the cyanopyrrol id ines originally discovered by Sherwin Will: and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the group at Ferring had become the most popular class of DP!’-W inhibitors. as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ittdgecl by the number of patent applications [18]. While the SAR around the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cyanopyrroiidinc ring was ratlier limited. a wide variety of attached amirzto pcids
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with lipophilic or polar. negatively or positively charged. side chains were tolerated.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`which provided ample room For proprietary structures.
`
`
`
`
`
`\
`N
`
`, N
`
`o
`
`N
`
`a
`
`O
`
`F
`
`F
`
`6
`N
`
`5
`
`
`
`K: 8.8 nM
`
`
`Merck. 2004
`
`
`
`
`PF-00734200
`
`
`
`
`ICW = 13 nM
`Pfizer. 2005
`
`
`
`
`
`OCFJ.
`
`o=_s.
`
`
`H
`H?“
`
`F
`
`(3
`N
`
`O
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`|C_¢.., = 35 NM
`
`Merck. 2004
`
`
`
`Figure 5.4
`
`
`
`Pyrrolidides without a serim.--interacting motif
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 28
`
`
`Page 7 of 28
`
`

`
`11-1
`
`
`
`5 Dipepridyl Peptidase IV lnlnbitors for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:> 0:1“?
`
`N
`
`7
`
`
`low = 54 nm
`
`
`
`
`0
`
`t
`
`
`
`5
`
`ICE, = 2 nM
`
`
`
`
`
`::>
`
`N\ x/''\
`JCS
`
`N
`
`NW
`
`0
`
`no
`
`1N
`
`NVP-DPP728
`
`
`I05“ = 22 nM
`
`
`
`Novarti-5. 1998
`
`
`
`
`Scaffold change leading to N-alkylglycine DPP-IV inhibitors: NVP-DPW23 was
`Figure 5.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`efficacious in a proof-oF—concepL trial.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`An important extension of this SAR was made already in 1996 by scientists at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Novartis. Edwin B. Villhauer. a cthemistwith a long-standing interest in diabetes. was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`looking for a new project when lens Holst‘s paper was published in 1995. Within a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`few days. he and his colleagues had a DPP-IV project running. Cells that happened to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`express DPP—lV were just available and provided an in 1"2l.lJ"O assay. A paper fron1‘|988.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`describing a DPP—[V substrate with sarcosine {N-methylglycinel as an N-terminal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`amino acid [26]. caught Villhauter's attention and led him to explore N-alkylglvcine
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cyanopyrrolidines. in which the side chain ofthe pyrrolidine-attached amino acid is.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`forrnally. shified to the nitrogen atom (e.g.. 6 —~ 7, Figure 5.5} [27]. The novel N-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`alkylglycine cyanopyrrolidines were amenable to resin-based chemistry. which was a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`very popular technology in those years. enabling the preparation of 1300 diverse
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compounds within 7 months. Only a few inhibitors with low nanomolar activities
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`were identified in this campaign. one of them carrying a {S-nitro-pyridin-2-yl}-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aminoethyl substituent. Replacement ofthe nitro functionality by a nitrile then led
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to NVP~Dl’P728 {Figure 5.5) with an improved selectivity over DP?-ll and PPCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lpostproline cleaving enzyme}. which were then standard enzymes in DPP-W
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`selectivity studies. Within only 9 months. the Novartis proiect team had identified
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a development compound. Clinical trials with NVP-DPP728 began in 1998. A First
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`phase 2 trial based on the then widely held paradigm that any type 2 diabetes patient
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`treated with a DPP-IV inhibitor should experience an immediate benefit. gave
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`disappointing results and almost stopped the p1'oiect. A detailed data analysis
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`suggested that patients with a certain level of pancreatic beta cell activity might
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`beriefit over a longer time frame. A second trial designed with the hindsight from this
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`analysis was a huge success: after 4 weeks of treatment. NVP-DPP728 reduced
`
`Page 8 of 28
`
`Page 8 of 28
`
`

`
`5.3 Substrate» Based DPP-W lmhilnutors
`
`
`
`
`
`‘H5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`postmeal glucose excursion. fasting glucose. and 24 h mean giitcrm‘. For the First
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`time. it was shown that chronic DPP-IV inhibition in diabetic patients was safe and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`also led to a reduction in Him“ levels [28].
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NVI’-DPP728's relatively short half-life of 0.85 h was initially not seen as a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`disadvantage. On the contrary.
`the many possible physiological roles. of DP!’-IV
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`made it desirable for a proof-of-concept compound that any potential adverse effects
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`would abate quickly after a discontinuation ofarlrninistration. DPP-IV cl»;-ave-s. at least
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in iritro. not only GLP-1 but also several peptidic hormones. neL1rot1'attsrnitters.and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cheniokiues. Of particular concern was initially the fact that DPP-[V is identical to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CD26. a surface protein on activated T-cells. which mediates stimulatory signals:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lorttt nalely. it was found that NV P- D PP’/'28 had no immunosuppressant eliect. { Later
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`on it was shown that the enzymatic activity of DPP-IV is not required for T-cell
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Function.) It might have been envisioned that NV P—D PP728 could be a sltorl:—acting,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`meal-dependently administered drug to reduce postprandial glucose excursiotrt. Such
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a tretttment would allow an intermittent recovery of DP P—IV activity. and the normal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`regttlation of other potential DPP-W substrates.
`thus minimizing side eflects.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`However, a team of Novo Nordisk researclters, collaborating with the Miami School
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of Medicine. demonstrated in 200] that :1 24 h infusion ofG1.P~1 over 7 days: gave a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`much better outcome for diabetic patients than a 16 h infusion. indicating that a 24-h
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`blockade of DPP-IV was needed to maxitnize the therapeutic eilect I291. In 2002.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Farting researchers published their results with the long—acting DPP-IV inltilrtitor FE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`99901] {Figure 5.6), which dearly showed that full inhibition of DPP-IV over 24 it
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`gave the best resu.lts in animal models ofdialraetes [30|. In the following years, most
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`companies therefore focused on inhibitors with high metabolic stability. and today all
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`clinically proven inhibitors show '.~5tl% plasma DPP-[V inhibition over 24h.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Apart from the demonstrated clinical efficacy and the facile synthetic access. there
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`might be yet another reason wily the N-alkylglycine inhibitors became very popular
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tliroughout the industry in the Following years: it was generally perceived that they
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`had a superior chemical stability. As already mentioned. cyanopyrrolidine lDPP-IV
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`inltibitors. and other substrate-based inhibitors with an electropltilic serine-inter
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acting motif. are chemically unstable in solution. This solution insetability is due to an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`intramolecular reaction between the amino function and the electrophilic motif. as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`depicted in Scheme 5.1. The short soiution half-life typically of a few hours was
`
`
`
`lN
`
`
`
`H-‘I0
`
`
`
`FE 999011
`
`
`
`
`K, = 3.8 nht
`
`
`Farting. 1996
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 5.6 Studies with FE 999011 showed that sustained Inhibition oi'DFPvIV leads to best results
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in animal models of diabetes.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 28
`
`
`Page 9 of 28
`
`

`
`
`‘I16 |
`
`5 Di'pep:i'dvl .°epti::l'ase lV inhibitorsfor the Treatment ofType 2 Diabetes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ft
`
`
`
`HZN
`
`N
`
`0
`
`l l
`N
`
`cyelization
`0
`
`—a-in j\:
`H
`
`N
`
`M
`H
`
`NH
`
`Scheme 5.1 The limited solution stability of cyanopyrrolicline DPP-IV inl-nibitors 15 due to an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mtrarnolecular reaction between the mandatory amino and cvano rIJI"ICt|Gt12lI[tES.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`causing problems for Formulation and was n1adeI'espuII.silJle For the short in uivol1a|l'-
`
`
`
`
`life of some compounds.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To ove:‘c.oIr1e Lhis limitation. many research groups explored Nalkyiglycines with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sterically hindered amines. which would undergo cyclization less readily. Early on.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Novartis scientists had identified an adamantyl derivative 8 [Figure 5.7}. which was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`one of" the I‘I't0S‘-I potent inhibitors discovered in their program. Also. the primary
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`metabolites of‘ lhi.'~: compound were found to be highly active. Already in 1998.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Villhauer syiitliesixed one ofthe putative metabolites. LAF-237. wllich turned out to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`have an excellent solution stability, potent lI‘Il‘tli'}il0I')' activity. and good selectivity over
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`related enzymes [31]. The improved pharmacokinetic profile and longer lasting
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pharmacoclynamic eiiect oi‘ LAF-237 led to a replacement of Novartis frrnit-runner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NVPDPP728. LA F-237 was later narnecl vildagliptin. in reference to Villhaut-r. its
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`inventor [32]. Viidagliptin has heen. after sitagliptin. the second compound to obtain
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`market approval in the European Union and other countries. In the United States.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Novartis; has paused its eliorts to seek regulator}-’ approval after the FDA had
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`requested additional data to address concerns about the tolerahility in patients with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`renal iinpairmenl and skin lesions in nonhuman primates ]3El| {although no skin
`
`H
`
`0
`
`on
`
`8
`
`lcm = 3 nM
`
`
`
`
`
`OH
`
`0
`
`cm
`
`LAF-237. vildagliptin
`
`
`lC_.,n = 3.5 nM
`
`
`Novartis. 2000
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cm
`
`HEN
`
`N
`
`0
`
`
`9
`
`K|=7nM
`
`
`
`
`:>
`
`
`
`HEN
`
`N
`
`0
`
`
`
`
`:{> “O3
`H9N'
`
`CN
`
`
`
`
`CN
`
`
`
`
`
`N
`
`
`
`o
`
`
`10
`
`K.:0.9 nN'|
`
`
`
`
`
`saxagliptin
`
`
`
`
`K,=0.6 nM
`B-MS. 2001
`
`
`
`Figure 5.? Discovery of vlldagliptin and Sattagllptln.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 28
`
`Page 10 of 28
`
`

`
`Table 5.1 Chemical stabilities of primary amine inhibitors.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Compound Halt’-life"
`
`
`
`5.3 Substrate-Based DPP-N inhibitors
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘I1?
`
`
`
`3 (lllj._',tlI'I.’ 3.3:
`
`
`
`
`I"-ii ‘}‘J‘.iUl l {Figure 5.6]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9 iFii.J.uI':'- 9.7}
`
`
`
`
`a}
`
`
`in ;1<|ut-nus butTer at pH ?_2: 39.3 (I.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3 li
`
`)7 ll
`
`4.2 It
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lesions have been observed in humans during clinical trials [67]]. Vilclagliptini is only
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`moderately selective over DPP-8 and DPP-‘J. Following Ll1e highly publicized Merck
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`study on the potential toxicities associated with DPP-8}‘) inhibition [21]. Novartis
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`undertook long-term rodent toxicity studies with \.-ildagliptin at exposures that are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`high enough for complete inhibition of DPP-IV. DPP-8. and DPP-‘J. As vildagliptin
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`did not display any of the toxicities observed with P32f98 and structurally related
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`molecules. the toxicity ofthe compounds studied by Merck is more likely the result of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`unidentified oft"-target effects that are independent ol‘DPl’-3,39. and the relevance of
`
`
`
`
`
`isolbrm selectivity remains unclear [34].
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Researchers at Bristol-Myers Squilih found that converting a tertiary (3. Figure 5.3}
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to a quaternary alpha-carbon {I-‘E 9991)! 1. Figure 5.6] improves the solution halif-life by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fivefold (Table 5.1 1. The long~|asting pltarrnacodynamic effect or FE 99901 I might. at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`least in part. be attributed to this improved solution stability. Also. the i ntroduction ofa
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`methylene bridge into the cyanopyrrolidine ring leads to steric bull: that similarly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`improves the chemical stability [compare FE 999011 and 9. Table 5.1}. Molecular
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`modeling demonstrated that these effects a re, in both cases. due to in tratnolec ular van
`der Waals interactions. These interactions disfavor a cis conformation of the amide.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`which is a prerequisite for cyclizatioti, and thereby increase stability [35]. These
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`findings led the Bristol-Myers Squibb scientists. in striking analogy to the ellbrts at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Novartis. to 10 with an adarnantyl substituent. This compound showed an excellent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plasma-DPP-IV inhibition after oral dosing in rats. despite a low liioavailability [2%l.
`This seemed to indicate that It] is converted into an active metabolite in vim. which
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prompted the synthesis ofa l'I)'drt)K)' analogueas a putative metabolite. Quite si milnr to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the vildagliptin story.
`it was found that this metabolite. later named saxagliptiri
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[Figure 5.7}. was highly potent and had an excellent solution stability llfii. Tlliis high
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`solution stability. together with a relatively high distribution volume. tnrtkes s:ax:iglip-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tinalong-actingDPP-IVinhibitor. Bflfilol-M)-'ErSSqLl‘ll.‘)lJ3]'1£lAStt‘3Z('t'll2CE1l'l£t\'nt‘5ilti1t'Erl
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the clinical development and filed a New Drug Application in 2008 [37].
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Other companies also came up quickly with N-alkylglyciites with a wide variety of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`quaternary N-suhstituents. T5-02.1. 11. and ABT-279 [Figure 5.8} are exam pies o

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket