throbber
Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` ______________________________
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` ______________________________
` MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
` WOCKHARDT BIO AG,
` TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
` AUROBINDO PHARMA U.S.A., INC.,
` Petitioners,
` v.
` ASTRAZENECA AB,
` Patent Owner.
` ______________________________
` Case: IPR2015-01340
` U.S. Patent No. RE44,186
` ______________________________
` DEPOSITION OF DAVID P. ROTELLA, Ph.D.
` Friday, December 2, 2016
` New York, New York
` 9:00 a.m.
`
`Reported by:
`Josephine H. Fassett, RPR
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 1 of 159
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2221
`Mylan v. AstraZeneca
`IPR2015-01340
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`2
`
` Friday, December 2, 2016
` New York, New York
` 9:00 a.m.
`
` T R A N S C R I P T of the Deposition
`of DAVID P. ROTELLA, Ph.D., held at the offices of
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, 1301 Avenue of
`the Americas, New York, New York, on Friday,
`December 2, 2016, at approximately 9:00 a.m.,
`pursuant to Notice, before Josephine H. Fassett,
`Registered Professional Reporter, Certified Court
`Reporter and Notary Public of the State of New
`York.
`
`1 2
`
`3
`4
`
`5 6
`
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 2 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`3
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S :
`
`APPEARING ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER MYLAN
`PHARMACEUTICALS INC.:
` WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
` 1700 K Street, N.W.
` Fifth Floor
` Washington, D.C. 20006-3817
` 202.973.8800
`BY: RICHARD TORCZON, ESQ.
` rtorczon@wsgr.com
` DAVID KNAPP, ESQ.
` dknapp@wsgr.com
`
`APPEARING ON BEHALF OF PATENT OWNER AZTRAZENECA
`AB:
` FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &
` DUNNER, LLP
` Two Freedom Square
` 11955 Freedom Drive
` Reston, Virginia 20190-5675
` 571.203.2700
`BY: CHARLES E. LIPSEY, ESQ.
` charles.lipsey@finnegan.com
` M. DAVID WEINGARTEN, Ph.D., ESQ.
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 3 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`4
`
` david.weingarten@finnegan.com
`
`1
`
`2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 4 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`5
`
`-----------------------INDEX----------------------
`WITNESS PAGE
`DAVID P. ROTELLA, Ph.D.
` By Mr. Lipsey 7,125
` By Mr. Torczon 123
`
` AFTERNOON SESSION - 86
`
`---------------EXHIBITS REFERENCED----------------
`Mylan Exhibit 1001
`Mylan Exhibit 1003
`Mylan Exhibit 1007
`Mylan Exhibit 1008
`Mylan Exhibit 1074
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2001
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2002
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2003
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2007
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2014
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2018
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2028
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2043
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2045
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2046
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2047
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 5 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`6
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`---------------EXHIBITS REFERENCED----------------
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2050
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2056
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2073
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2081
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2096
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2098
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2151
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2158
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2174
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2176
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2223
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2226
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2228
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2229
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2230
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2231
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2232
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2233
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2234
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2235
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2236
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2237
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2238
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2239
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 6 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`7
`
`---------------EXHIBITS REFERENCED----------------
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2241
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2243
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2244
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2245
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2246
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2247
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2254
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2256
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2257
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2257A
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2258
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2259
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2259A
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2260
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2261
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2262
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2263
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 7 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` (Whereupon, on the record.)
`D A V I D P. R O T E L L A, P h. D.,
`the witness, having been duly sworn, was examined
`and testified under oath as follows:
` EXAMINATION
`BY MR. LIPSEY:
` Q. Good morning, Dr. Rotella. Just for
`the formality of it, would you state your name and
`residence address for the record, please.
` A. My name is David P. Rotella. I reside
`at 78 Iroquois Avenue, Lake Hiawatha, New Jersey.
` Q. Okay. I'd like to show you what's
`been marked previously as Mylan Exhibit 1074,
`which is entitled Second Declaration of David P.
`Rotella, Ph.D.
` And that is your reply declaration
`filed in this IPR proceeding, correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Now, simply because we may have
`occasion to refer to it today, I'd like to also
`show you what's previously been marked as Mylan
`Exhibit 1003, which is entitled Declaration of
`David P. Rotella, Ph.D.
` A. Thank you.
` Q. And that is your original declaration
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 8 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`filed in this IPR proceeding, correct?
` A. Correct. Mr. Lipsey, before we
`proceed.
` Q. Absolutely.
` A. In the reply declaration.
` Q. Okay.
` A. In reviewing this, I noticed a typo
`that I'd like to correct, please.
` Q. Absolutely.
` A. It is in Paragraph 24, which that
`Paragraph 24 starts on page 12 and goes to
`page 13.
` Q. Okay.
` A. The last phrase in that last paragraph
`there, I'll read what is written: Is not
`considered a much less bulky group. I'd like to
`eliminate the word "not." So I'd like to --
` Q. Okay.
` A. I'd like to eliminate the word "not."
` Q. Okay. As is customary in these
`proceedings, when there is an errata correction,
`both go into evidence, and your testimony is
`noted. And I will make the notation of your
`testimony in my copy.
` Would you like to mark the exhibit?
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 9 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`10
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. I'm good. Thank you.
` Q. Okay.
` A. And I apologize for not catching this
`previously, but.
` Q. Well, while we're at it, would you
`take a look at page 28 and Paragraph 50.
` The third line there you make
`reference to cis-4,5-cyclohexyl. Is that what you
`meant?
` A. Probably not.
` Q. Okay.
` A. That probably should be a -- well,
`that term is actually confusing. Confusing in the
`sense that I'm not sure exactly what it refers to.
`So...
` Q. Why are you confused?
` A. Well, it's not -- sorry. It's not --
`it's an inappropriate term that -- I'm assuming
`that Exhibit 2056 is the Magnin 2004 paper.
` Q. Well, I think I'm about to hand you
`Exhibit 2056, so let's --
` A. So I -- before we attempt to make a
`correction, I want to make sure I understand --
` Q. Okay.
` A. -- what we're referring to.
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 10 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q. I'd like to hand you what's previously
`been marked as AstraZeneca Exhibit 2056, which is
`the Declaration of Ann E. Weber, Ph.D., filed in
`these proceedings.
` By reference to 2056, can you clarify
`what you meant in Paragraph 50 of your reply
`report?
` A. Yes. Okay. So -- so this should be
`a -- the term cis-4,5-cyclohexyl group should be
`replaced with cis-4,5-cyclopropyl pyrrolidine.
` Q. Okay. With that correction, are you
`satisfied with the text?
` A. Yes, I am. Thank you.
` Q. Okay. And lastly, because we may have
`occasion to refer to it today, I'd like to hand
`you what's previously been marked as AstraZeneca
`Exhibit 2174, which is the transcript of your
`deposition. Do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Some of what I hope to do today is
`simply to crystallize the areas of dispute. I
`think there's much that we can probably agree on
`and much that we'll never agree on, and as long as
`we can sort out what those two things are in a way
`that the reader of our transcript can understand
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 11 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`what we're talking about, then we've advanced the
`ball.
` I would like to start by showing you a
`demonstrative exhibit that I've marked for
`identification as AstraZeneca 2226.
` MR. TORCZON: Is this already in the
` record in some point?
` MR. LIPSEY: No. It's a
` demonstrative exhibit for facilitating
` cross-examination.
` Q. I've noted the sources of the
`information here, but just to be clear.
` Dr. Weber had suggested that the lead
`compounds that a person seeking to make a DPP-4
`inhibitor at the relevant time would select, would
`be the two DPP-4 inhibitors that were in the
`clinic NVP-DPP728 and P32/98. Is that your
`understanding?
` A. Yes, it is.
` Q. Okay. And would you agree that -- for
`purposes of our reader -- we correctly depicted
`what those structures are here on Exhibit 2226?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. And as indicated in the red
`circles NVP-DPP728 as an N-linked P2 group, right?
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 12 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Yes.
` Q. And as depicted for P32/98, it has no
`cyano group or other electrophilic group on the P1
`group, correct?
` A. It does not have a cyano group, that's
`correct.
` Q. Okay. Now, rather than those two
`compounds, you selected as your lead compound one
`of the compounds from Ashworth I. And so that we
`know what we're talking about, I'd like to show
`you Mylan Exhibit 1007.
` And that's the document we've been
`referring to in these proceedings as Ashworth I,
`right?
` I need an audible answer.
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Okay. And you selected as your lead
`compound compound 25 out of Ashworth I, right?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Okay. Now, I saw in your reply
`report, Mylan Exhibit 1074, multiple references to
`bulky P2 groups. Is that a fair characterization?
` A. There are multiple references to that
`term, yes.
` Q. Okay. Now, by reference to
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 13 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Ashworth I, Mylan Exhibit 1007, Dr. Ashworth
`doesn't say "bulky," she says "beta branched,"
`right?
` A. She uses the term beta branched. The
`term bulky, is a term that a medicinal chemist in
`the year 2000, and the year 2016, that's a term
`that is commonly understood and it is sort of
`innately well understood. It's also a term that
`was used by others. For example, Mentlein in 1993
`used the term bulky amino acid.
` Q. Okay. But --
` A. And so a beta branched amino acid is,
`or could be, a bulky group, depending on how it is
`branched, what branching occurs, and on the
`specifics of that structure.
` Q. But the fact of the matter is that
`Ashworth did not use the term bulky to describe
`the P2 groups in Ashworth I, Mylan Exhibit 1007,
`correct?
` A. As I've said, Ashworth did not use the
`term, however, a medicinal chemist in the year
`2000 understands what the term bulky means.
` Q. I'm going to ask you one more time,
`and then I'm going to move to strike your answer,
`if you don't answer my question. And the only
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 14 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`reason -- I'm not trying to be nasty, it's just
`we'll never get done if we don't do it this way.
` Ashworth does not use the word "bulky"
`to describe her P2 groups in Mylan Exhibit 1007,
`Ashworth I, correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Thank you.
` Now, referring to Table 2 in
`Ashworth I, Mylan Exhibit 1007, those are the
`cyanopyrrolidine-based inhibitors that Ashworth I
`made and published here, correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And I know that we probably have a
`disagreement of sorts on the word to be used here.
` So, to try to get around that, I'd
`like to show you a demonstrative I've made and
`marked for identification as AstraZeneca
`Exhibit 2261.
` And as reflected there, can we agree
`that Ashworth I's largest P2 group, compound 28,
`was less stable?
` A. Compound 28 is clearly less stable
`compared to compound 25. And it's your
`description, largest, that I think is misplaced.
` Q. Well, let's try to get around it this
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 15 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`way: Ashworth I uses the phrase Lys(Z)?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And for the lay reader, have I
`correctly drawn out the structure of what that
`molecule 28 in Ashworth I would look like as
`compound 28?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. And have I correctly drawn out
`what compound 25, your lead compound, would look
`like?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Okay.
` A. But I'd like to point out that a
`medicinal chemist in the year 2000, and in the
`year 2016, and in the year 1990, would understand
`that there is a significant and material
`difference in the bulkiness of those two groups
`based on their structures. And I would not equate
`the term large with bulky because they are -- they
`describe two different features.
` Q. Okay. Before we leave the concept of
`beta branching -- and, again, for the edification
`of our reader -- I'd like to show you a
`demonstrative exhibit I've made and marked for
`identification as AstraZeneca Exhibit 2223 that
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 16 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`deals with the issue of nomenclature of some beta
`branched molecules.
` And can we agree that the two
`molecules in the left-hand panel are beta branched
`with a so-called tertiary beta carbon?
` A. And just to be sure you and I are
`looking at the same thing. You're referring to
`the C that's at the point where all three of those
`red lines come together?
` Q. Correct.
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. And both molecules on the
`right-hand panel, the one with the t-butyl
`substituent and the one with the adamantyl
`substituent have what is called a quaternary
`carbon at the beta position?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Okay. And I think you mentioned
`Mentlein. Let's take a look at that.
` I'd like to show you what's been
`marked as AstraZeneca Exhibit 2096, which is a
`copy of the Mentlein publication appearing in
`1993.
` Is that the Mentlein publication you
`were referring to in your earlier answer?
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 17 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Yes, it is.
` Q. Okay. Now, you did not cite that
`publication in your opening report, correct?
` A. I did not. This was cited by
`Dr. Weber in a report that she -- or a response
`that she submitted, if memory serves.
` Q. Okay. And just so that we're clear
`about what Mentlein is talking about. He's
`talking about natural substrates for the DPP-4
`enzyme, right?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. And those are molecules that the DPP-4
`enzyme actually cleaves, right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And the groups in the natural
`substrates for DPP-4 that would be in what he
`calls the P2 position are tyrosine and histidine,
`correct?
` You can look at Figure 1, if you'd
`like.
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. And none of the molecules in
`any of that prior art that you've relied on used
`tyrosine or histidine in the P2 position of a
`DPP-4 inhibitor, correct?
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 18 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. None of the references that I've cited
`employ either of those amino acids.
` Q. And, again, for the edification of our
`reader. If you could take a look at Dr. Weber's
`declaration, AstraZeneca Exhibit 2056. And
`specifically at Paragraph 57 that bridges pages 18
`and 19.
` A. Okay.
` Q. Okay. That has the structure of amino
`acids, correct?
` A. Yeah. These are -- these are
`structures of the 20 commonly occurring amino
`acids.
` Q. Okay. And among them is tyrosine
`there in the bottom row on page 18, right?
` A. Uh-hum.
` Q. And the substituent there is a benzyl
`group with an OH on it, right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And if we go to page 19, we see
`histidine?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And that has a 5-membered heterocyclic
`ring, including carbon and nitrogen, joined to the
`amino acid through a CH2 group, correct?
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 19 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Yes.
` Q. And those are what Mentlein was
`referring to as bulky groups, correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Now, I guess I'd like to show you next
`what's been marked as Mylan Exhibit 1008, which is
`the Villhauer WO 98/19998 publication.
` That's one of the references that you
`relied upon in your obviousness opinion, correct?
` A. Yes, it is.
` Q. And if I understand your opinion
`correctly, it's your view that this publication
`would have led a person of ordinary skill in the
`art to replace the cyclohexyl group in Ashworth I,
`compound 25, with an adamantyl group; is that
`fair?
` A. This is part of the argument, yes.
` Q. Okay.
` A. There are other references that were
`cited in my original declaration that contribute
`to that conclusion.
` Q. And, as I understand your opinion, you
`have focused in Mylan Exhibit 1008 at the text at
`the bottom of page 5, which describes even more
`preferred compounds; is that right?
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 20 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Yes. The even more preferred, of
`course, is Villhauer's term.
` Q. Okay.
` A. Which I presume to infer that those
`compounds are particularly of interest for reasons
`that they understood and appreciated.
` Q. Okay. And just so that we don't have
`to quarrel about it later. Can we agree that the
`number of different molecules that are embraced by
`the description in that paragraph is in the many
`of hundreds?
` A. That's true. This is a generic
`description that is commonly used in patents to
`describe classes of compounds.
` Q. Okay. And in this particular --
` A. One --
` Q. In this particular publication, when
`we get to page 21 of Mylan Exhibit 1008, the
`Villhauer 19998 publication, he states there: The
`agents of Examples 1, 3, 5, 8 and 12 are the
`preferred agents of the invention. Do you see
`where I've read?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And he includes data on those
`molecules at various places in the application.
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 21 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Do you recall seeing that?
` A. Yes, I do.
` Q. And just, again, for the benefit of
`our reader, I'd like to show you a demonstrative
`exhibit that I've marked for identification as
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2263 where I have collected
`the structural formula for those five examples and
`the data about them published throughout the
`application. Can we agree on that?
` A. If you don't mind, I'd like to just be
`sure.
` Q. Sure. And to the extent it would
`help, this information is also in Paragraph 201 of
`Dr. Weber's report on page 94.
` A. So, yes, I'll agree that the
`structures that you've listed here are those from
`the patent.
` Q. Okay. And the data is correctly
`reported? I think we've all looked at this a lot
`over the years.
` A. Yes.
` MR. TORCZON: Object to the scope.
` Q. Okay. Now, all of the DPP-4
`inhibitors in the Villhauer 19998 publication,
`Mylan Exhibit 1008, are N-linked, correct?
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 22 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. That's correct.
` Q. And, as such, those P2 groups of those
`inhibitors will occupy a different position in
`space than they would were those P2 groups
`C-linked, correct?
` A. That's unknown. I would -- and I have
`no opinion on that, on what position those groups
`would occupy in space.
` Q. I'd like to show you a demonstrative
`exhibit that I've made based on Dr. Weber's
`report. It's marked for identification as
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2259, which is a space filling
`model of an N- and C-linked adamantyl containing
`inhibitor.
` MR. LIPSEY: For the record, this is
` in Paragraph 200 of Dr. Weber's report.
`BY MR. LIPSEY:
` Q. And you're familiar with space filling
`models, correct?
` A. I am.
` Q. And so, at least based on this space
`filling model, it suggests that that P2 group in
`an N-linked molecule was going to occupy a
`different position in space than it would if it
`were C-linked, correct?
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 23 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. That's not my conclusion and I would
`not -- these represent static pictures, they do
`not represent the dynamics of a molecule in
`solution, and so I would hesitate to draw any firm
`conclusions about what position in space these
`groups occupy.
` Q. Okay. Now, the N-linkage in the
`Villhauer DPP-4 inhibitors that Novartis was
`making and publishing on was generally believed to
`enhance the stability of those molecules, correct?
` A. I wasn't asked to comment on the
`stability, and I wasn't asked to provide opinions
`on the stability of molecules in the Villhauer
`patent. But I'll note that stability is a feature
`that one has to pay attention to in a DPP-4
`inhibitor that contains a cyano functional group.
` Q. I'd like to show you a document that's
`been marked for identification as AstraZeneca
`Exhibit 2262, that we actually discussed in your
`deposition, that's entitled Analogue-Based
`Discovery II.
` Okay. The Analogue-Based Drug
`Discovery publications are reliable scientific
`authorities on matters that they address, correct?
` A. Yes. And I'll note for the record
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 24 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`that this was published in 2010, which is past the
`priority date for the patent in question here.
` Q. Okay. And the article purports, in
`part, to describe the history of the development
`of the DPP-4 inhibitor field, correct?
` A. It does.
` Q. And on page 115, extending over to
`116, Analogue-Based Drug Discovery II states:
`Apart from the demonstrated clinical efficacy and
`the facile synthetic access, there might be yet
`another reason why the N-alkylglycine inhibitors
`became very popular throughout the industry in the
`following years: It was generally perceived that
`they had a superior chemical stability. As
`already mentioned, cyanopyrrolidine DPP-4
`inhibitors, and other substrate-based inhibitors
`with an electrophilic serine-interacting motif,
`are chemically unstable in solution. This
`solution instability is due to an intramolecular
`reaction between the amino function and the
`electrophilic motif, as depicted in Scheme 5.1.
`The short solution half-life typically of a few
`hours was causing problems for formulation and was
`made responsible for the short in vivo half-life
`of some compounds.
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 25 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` To overcome this limitation, many
`research groups explored N-alkylglycines with
`sterically hindered amines, which would undergo
`cyclization less readily.
` Did I correctly read that?
` MR. TORCZON: Objection. Hearsay.
` MR. LIPSEY: It's all part of the
` transcript.
` A. You correctly read it. And that
`represents this author's opinion because those are
`his words.
` Q. Okay. And, in fact, you were one of
`those researchers that experimented extensively
`with N-alkylglycine; in other words, N-linked
`DPP-4 inhibitors, correct?
` A. In work that I've carried out at
`Bristol-Myers Squibb, that was one area of
`investigation.
` Q. Okay.
` A. The purpose of that investigation was
`subsequent to the discovery of saxagliptin.
` Q. Okay. And we saw that reflected in
`your target sheets from your time at BMS, which we
`saw in your deposition, which I've marked for
`identification as AstraZeneca Exhibit 2260,
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 26 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`correct?
` A. And it -- yeah, this is correct. And
`it is worth noting that these molecules do not
`contain a cyano group. These target molecules do
`not contain cyano groups.
` Q. Would you turn, please, in AstraZeneca
`Exhibit 2260 to page 5 of 20.
` A. (Complies.)
` Q. The bottom compound on the right-hand
`side is an N-linked DPP-4 inhibitor with a cyano
`group, correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Okay.
` A. And so I'll note again that these
`molecules were -- the design and synthesis of
`these molecules was based on information that --
`or based on strategic objectives that the company
`provided to us to use for our work. And so -- and
`this occurred, of course, after the discovery of
`saxagliptin.
` Q. Okay. I'd like shift gears a little
`and I'd like to show you the Augustyns 1997
`publication which has been marked as AstraZeneca
`2151.
` And I would also like to show you what
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 27 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`we've been calling the Ashworth II publication,
`which has been marked as AstraZeneca 2001.
` Now, again, for the benefit of our
`reader, one of the things that both Augustyns and
`Ashworth looked at was the effect of changing the
`ring size in the P1 group of the DPP-4 inhibitor,
`correct?
` A. In two different classes of DPP-4
`inhibitors, that's correct.
` Q. Okay.
` A. And so I will -- I'd like to note that
`observations that one makes in one class of
`molecules may not necessarily be predictable, or
`translatable, always, to others. Sometimes they
`are and sometimes they aren't.
` Q. And, again, in an effort to kind of
`decode these documents for the reader, I'd like to
`show you a demonstrative exhibit that I've marked
`for identification as AstraZeneca Exhibit 2228
`that depicts the molecules in the structural
`formula of the data bearing on ring size out of
`Augustyns 1997.
` A. Okay.
` Q. Okay. Have I correctly captured that
`information?
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 28 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`29
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. And so that we can talk about
`it all at once, I'd like to show you a
`demonstrative exhibit I've marked as AstraZeneca
`Exhibit 2230 that captures information bearing on
`ring size out of Ashworth II.
` A. Okay.
` Q. Have I correctly captured that
`information?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. So both Augustyns 1997 and
`Ashworth II have data indicating that a 6-membered
`ring in a pyrrolidine or cyanopyrrolidine-based
`DPP-4 inhibitor would substantially reduce
`activity, correct?
` A. I'm sorry, could you repeat the
`question, please?
` Q. I'll try.
` Both Augustyns 1997, Exhibit 2151, and
`Ashworth II, Exhibit 2001, have data indicating
`that use of a 6-membered ring in a pyrrolidine or
`cyanopyrrolidine-based DPP-4 inhibitor
`substantially reduces activity, correct?
` A. If you're referring to a comparison to
`the 5-membered ring, the smaller 5-membered ring,
`
`202-220-4158
`
`Henderson Legal Services, Inc.
`www.hendersonlegalservices.com
`
`Page 29 of 159
`
`

`

`Rotella, Ph.D., David P.
`
`Case: IPR2015-01340
`
`December 2, 2016
`
`30
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`that's correct.
` Q. Okay. Thank you.
` Now, the fact of the matter is that a
`cyanopyrrolidine ring with a cyclopropyl group in
`the 4,5-position would, according to the IUPAC --
`I-U-P-A-C -- naming conventions be named as a
`6-carbon molecule, correct?
` A. I'm not an expert on IUPAC
`nomenclature and so I would bow to them and assume
`that they'r

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket