throbber
Diabetologia (1996) 39: 1546–1553
`
`(cid:211) Springer-Verlag 1996
`
`Effects of subcutaneous glucagon-like peptide 1
`(GLP-1 [7–36 amide]) in patients with NIDDM
`
`M.A. Nauck1, D. Wollschla¨ger2, J. Werner2, J. J. Holst3, C. Ørskov3, W. Creutzfeldt4, B. Willms2
`1 Department of Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Knappschafts-Krankenhaus, Bochum, Germany
`2 Fachklinik fu¨ r Diabetes und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, Bad Lauterberg, Germany
`3 Departments of Anatomy and Physiology, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
`4 Division of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Georg-August-University, Go¨ ttingen, Germany
`
`Summary Intravenous glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-
`1 [7–36 amide] can normalize plasma glucose in non-
`insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) patients. Since
`this is no form for routine therapeutic administration,
`effects of subcutaneous GLP-1 at a high dose (1.5
`nmol/kg body weight) were examined. Three groups
`of 8, 9 and 7 patients (61 – 7, 61 – 9, 50 – 11 years;
`BMI 29.5 – 2.5, 26.1 – 2.3, 28.0 – 4.2 kg/m2; HbA1 c
`11.3 – 1.5, 9.9 – 1.0, 10.6 – 0.7 %) were examined: af-
`ter a single subcutaneous injection of 1.5 nmol/kg
`GLP [7–36 amide]; after repeated subcutaneous in-
`jections (0 and 120 min) in fasting patients; after a
`single, subcutaneous injection 30 min before a liquid
`test meal (amino acids 8 %, and sucrose 50 g in
`400 ml), all compared with a placebo. Glucose (glu-
`cose oxidase), insulin, C-peptide, GLP-1 and gluca-
`gon (specific immunoassays) were measured. Gastric
`emptying was assessed with the indicator-dilution
`method and phenol red. Repeated measures ANO-
`VA was used for statistical analysis. GLP-1 injection
`led to a short-lived increment in GLP-1 concentra-
`tions (peak at 30–60 min, then return to basal levels
`after 90–120 min). Each GLP-1 injection stimulated
`insulin (insulin, C-peptide, p < 0.0001, respectively)
`and inhibited glucagon secretion (p < 0.0001). In fast-
`ing patients the repeated administration of GLP-1
`
`normalized plasma glucose (5.8 –
`0.4 mmol/l after
`240 min vs 8.2 – 0.7 mmol/l after a single dose,
`p = 0.0065). With the meal, subcutaneous GLP-1 led
`to a complete cessation of gastric emptying for 30–
`45 min (p < 0.0001 statistically different from pla-
`cebo) followed by emptying at a normal rate. As a
`consequence,
`integrated incremental glucose re-
`sponses were reduced by 40 % (p = 0.051). In conclu-
`sion, subcutaneous GLP-1 [7–36 amide] has similar
`effects in NIDDM patients as an intravenous infu-
`sion. Preparations with retarded release of GLP-1
`would appear more suitable for therapeutic purposes
`because elevation of GLP-1 concentrations for 4
`rather than 2 h (repeated doses) normalized fasting
`plasma glucose better. In the short term, there ap-
`pears to be no tachyphylaxis, since insulin stimulation
`and glucagon suppression were similar upon repeated
`administrations of GLP-1 [7–36 amide]. It may be
`easier to influence fasting hyperglycaemia by GLP-1
`than to reduce meal-related increments in glycaemia.
`[Diabetologia (1996) 39: 1546–1553]
`
`Keywords GLP-1 [7–36 amide], incretin, insulin, gluca-
`gon, pharmacokinetics.
`
`Corresponding author: Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. M. Nauck, Depart-
`ment of Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Knappschafts-
`Krankenhaus, In der Schornau 23–25, D-44 892 Bochum, Ger-
`many
`Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; EDTA, ethylene di-
`amine tetra-acetic acid; GIP, gastric inhibitory polypeptide;
`GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; RM-ANOVA, repeated mea-
`sures analysis of variance; NIDDM, non-insulin-dependent di-
`abetes mellitus; IR, immunoreactive.
`
`Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) [7–36 amide] is an
`insulinotropic hormone secreted from enterogluca-
`gon-producing L cells in the lower gut, i. e. the ileum
`and colon/rectum [1, 2]. GLP-1 [7–36 amide], to-
`gether with gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)
`from the upper gut, acts as a physiological incretin
`hormone [3, 4]. In pharmacological concentrations,
`exogenous GLP-1 [7–36 amide or 7–37] also raised
`insulin and lowered glucagon concentrations in
`
`SAXA-DEF-00001
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2020
` Mylan v. AstraZeneca
` IPR2015-01340
`
`

`
`M. A. Nauck et al.: Subcutaneous GLP-1 [7–36 amide] effects in NIDDM
`
`1547
`
`Table 1. Characteristics of NIDDM patients studied
`Parameter
`Study A
`Fasting patients
`Single dose
`5/3
`61 – 7
`29.5 – 2.5
`9 – 3
`11.3 – 1.5
`1429 – 262
`9.6 – 2.5
`1/7
`1/7
`162 – 28
`94 – 16
`
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] s. c.:
`Sex (male/female)
`Age (years)
`Body mass index (kg/m2)
`Diabetes duration (years)
`HbA1c (%)
`Diet (kCal/day)
`Glibenclamide (mg/day)
`Metformin (yes/no)
`Acarbose (yes/no)
`RRsystolic (mm Hg)
`RRdiastolic (mm Hg)
`Data are mean – SD
`
`Study B
`Fasting patients
`Repeated dose
`4/5
`61 – 9
`26.1 – 2.3
`11 – 7
`9.9 – 1.0
`1538 – 348
`10.5 – 0
`2/7
`0/9
`138 – 19
`72 – 13
`
`Study C
`Liquid meal
`Single dose
`3/4
`50 – 11
`28.0 – 4.2
`10 – 4
`10.6 – 0.7
`1416 – 253
`10.5 – 0
`6/1
`0/7
`136 – 12
`82 – 11
`
`Significance
`ANOVA
`(p -value)
`0.69
`0.03
`0.096
`0.59
`0.054
`0.66
`0.39
`0.007
`0.35
`0.043
`0.012
`
`non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) patients
`[5, 6]. By these mechanisms, plasma glucose was nor-
`malized within 3–4 h by i. v. GLP-1 [7–36 amide] in
`NIDDM patients with secondary failure of sulpho-
`nylurea treatment
`[7]. Therefore, GLP-1 [7–36
`amide] or GLP-1 [7–37] (which has an identical ac-
`tion profile in rats [8], normal humans [9] and
`NIDDM patients [10]) has been suggested for use in
`the therapy of NIDDM patients [5–7, 10, 11]. How-
`ever, a mode of administration has to be sought that
`both makes use of the potential to normalize glycae-
`mia in NIDDM patients [7, 10] and that will be ac-
`ceptable when compared with other current therapy.
`One obvious way is the s. c. administration of this
`peptide hormone. Limited experience using small do-
`ses of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] have been reported by
`Gutniak et al. [12]. However, they only used it to re-
`duce postprandial glycaemic excursions. GLP-1 [7–
`36 amide] was injected shortly before the ingestion
`of a meal, and the effects noted were smaller in com-
`parison to the normalization of fasting hyperglycae-
`mia that can be achieved by i. v. GLP-1 [7–36 amide]
`in NIDDM patients [6, 10]. Since i. v. GLP-1 [7–36
`amide] profoundly influences fasting hyperglycaemia
`in NIDDM patients [7, 10], it was the aim to also ex-
`amine the effect of s. c. GLP-1 in fasting patients,
`and to compare it to a preprandial administration.
`The amount administered in the present study was
`the maximum dose that was free of severe side-effects
`in young, healthy volunteers [13]. Preliminary results
`have been communicated in abstract form [14].
`
`Subjects, materials and methods
`
`Study protocol. The study protocols were approved by the eth-
`ics committee of the medical faculty of the Georg-August Uni-
`versity, Go¨ ttingen, prior to the study. Written, informed con-
`sent was obtained from all participants.
`
`Subjects. Three groups of NIDDM patients were studied, hav-
`ing been admitted to a specialized diabetes clinic because of
`
`unsatisfactory metabolic control. Their characteristics are
`shown in Table 1. All were treated with diet and oral agents
`(sulphonylurea in all, plus acarbose or metformin in some).
`Diabetes, on average, had been diagnosed approximately
`10 years earlier. Metabolic control at the time of the study, as
`indicated by HbA1 c values of 10–11 % (normal: 4.3–6.1 %),
`was unsatisfactory. Most patients were slightly obese.
`All patients were studied on two occasions; in randomized
`order, in a single-blind fashion, placebo (0.9 % NaCl with 1 %
`human serum albumin) or GLP-1 [7–36 amide] in a dose of
`1.5 nmol/kg body weight was administered in the morning af-
`ter an overnight fast as a single or repeated dose. Anti-dia-
`betic medication (Table 1) was given until the night before
`the first experiment. Between the experiments, 1 day with a
`regular eating and treatment schedule (including all drugs)
`was allowed.
`Three protocols were compared: Study A examined the ef-
`fect of a single s. c. injection of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] (adminis-
`tered at time 0 min) in fasting NIDDM patients followed for
`240 min. Study B examined the effect of a repeated s. c. injec-
`tion of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] (administered at time 0 and
`120 min) in fasting NIDDM patients followed for 240 min.
`Study C examined effects of a preprandial single s. c. injection
`of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] (administered at time –30 min) in
`NIDDM patients. At time 0 min, a liquid mixed meal made
`up of a commercially available amino acid solution (Amino-
`steril N-Hepa 8 %; Fresenius AG, Bad Homburg, Germany)
`and sucrose (50 g per 400 ml) was administered via a nasogas-
`tric tube. Results were observed over 240 min.
`
`Peptides. Synthetic GLP-1 [7–36 amide] was purchased from
`Saxon Biochemicals GmbH, Hannover, Germany (PGAS
`242). The peptide was dissolved in 0.9 % NaCl containing 1 %
`human serum albumin (Merieux, Norderstedt, Germany), fil-
`tered through 0.2 mm nitrocellulose filters (Millipore, Bed-
`ford, Mass., USA) and stored frozen at –30(cid:176) C as previously
`described [4, 5, 7]. Net peptide content rather than gross
`weight was used for dose calculations. High performance liq-
`uid chromatography profiles (provided by the manufacturer)
`showed that the preparation was more than 99 % pure (single
`peak coeluting with appropriate standards). Samples were
`analysed for bacterial growth (standard culture techniques)
`and for pyrogens (Limulus amebocyte lysate endo-LAL,
`Chromogenix AB, Mo¨ lndal, Sweden). No bacterial contami-
`nation was detected. Endotoxin concentrations in the GLP-1
`[7–36 amide] stem solutions were always less than 0.03 endo-
`toxin units (EU)/ml.
`
`SAXA-DEF-00002
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`
`1548
`
`M. A. Nauck et al.: Subcutaneous GLP-1 [7–36 amide] effects in NIDDM
`
`Experimental procedures. One forearm vein was punctured
`with a teflon cannula (Moskito 123, 18 gauge; Vygon, Aachen,
`Germany), and kept patent using 0.9 % NaCl.
`In experiments with fasting NIDDM patients, after drawing
`basal blood specimens, at 0 min, GLP-1 [7–36 amide] was ad-
`ministered s. c. into the periumbilical region. The injected vol-
`ume was 1 ml per 85 kg body weight. In study B, at 120 min
`the subcutaneous injection of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] was re-
`peated.
`
`Blood specimens. Blood was drawn into heparinized tubes (im-
`munoreactive [IR] insulin and C-peptide measurements). A
`sample was stored in NaF (Microvette CB 300; Sarstedt, Nu¨ m-
`brecht, Germany) for the measurement of glucose. For gluca-
`gon and GLP-1 [7–36 amide] measurements, blood was drawn
`into tubes containing ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid
`(EDTA) and aprotinin (Trasylol; 20 000 kallikrein inhibitor
`units/ml, 200 ml per 10 ml blood; Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Ger-
`many). After centrifugation, plasma for hormone analyses
`was kept frozen at –30(cid:176) C.
`
`Gastric emptying. In study C, before the start of the experi-
`ments, a nasogastric tube (Freka-Erna¨hrungssonde, 120 cm,
`CH 12, Fresenius AG) was placed and tape-fixed with the tip
`approximately 55 cm from the nostrils. Gastric juice was aspi-
`rated and an acid pH was ascertained using pH-sensitive lack-
`mus paper. The gastric lumen was washed with 100 ml tap wa-
`ter warmed to 37(cid:176) C. If instilled water could not be completely
`aspirated, the position of the tube was adjusted to allow a
`near-complete aspiration of instilled fluid. The patients were
`in a semi-recumbent position, with the upper body 45(cid:176) upright.
`At –30 min, GLP-1 [7–36 amide] was administered s. c., and at
`0 min, the liquid meal (warmed to 37(cid:176) C) was instilled into the
`stomach. Previous studies had indicated peak plasma concen-
`trations around 30 min after s. c. injection of GLP-1 [7–36
`amide] [13]. The meal consisted of 32 g mixed amino acids
`(131 kCal = 40 % of total caloric content) and 50 g sucrose
`(196 kCal = 60 %). Total energy content was 327 kCal (energy
`density 0.82 kCal/ml) [15, 16].
`Gastric emptying was determined exactly as in a previous
`study testing intravenously infused GLP-1 [7–36 amide] in a
`similar group of NIDDM patients [15], by a double-sampling
`dye dilution technique using phenol red (Merck AG, Darms-
`tadt, Germany), according to George [17], with modifications
`introduced to reduce the measurement error by Hurwitz et al.
`[18]. In principle, at all time-points chosen to measure gastric
`volume, a known amount of the non-absorbable phenol red
`dye was added to the translucent test meal in a volume of 5 to
`15 ml. After thorough mixing with gastric contents for approx-
`imately 2 min, a gastric sample was drawn, and the resulting
`step-up in phenol red concentrations was determined photo-
`metrically. Increasing amounts of phenol red were used as the
`experiments proceeded to obtain clearly measurable incre-
`ments in optical density also in the presence of previously in-
`stilled phenol red [18]. In vitro, this method measured gastric
`volume with an accuracy of less than 6 % (coefficient of varia-
`tion).
`
`Laboratory determinations. Glucose was measured using a glu-
`cose oxidase method with a Glucose Analyser 2 (Beckman In-
`struments, Munich, Germany). Plasma IR-insulin and C-pep-
`tide were determined using commercial immunoassay kits. In-
`sulin was measured using an insulin microparticle enzyme im-
`munoassay (MEIA) IMx Insulin, Abbott Laboratories, Wies-
`baden, Germany, which shows a correlation coefficient 0.982
`vs RIA 100; Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany (the assay used in
`our previous study [15]). Intra-assay coefficients of variation
`
`were less than 4.0 %. C-peptide was measured using C-peptide
`antibody-coated microtitre wells (C-peptide MTPL EIA) from
`DRG Instruments GmbH, (Marburg, Germany). Human insu-
`lin and C-peptide were used as standard.
`IR-GLP-1 was determined in ethanol-extracted plasma as
`previously described [19], using antiserum 89 390 (final dilu-
`tion 1:150 000) and synthetic GLP-1 [7–36 amide] for tracer
`preparation and as standard. Recovery of GLP-1 [7–36 amide]
`standards after alcohol extraction was 75 – 8 %. The experi-
`mental detection limit (2 standard deviations over samples
`not containing GLP-1 [7–36 amide]) was less than 5 pmol/l.
`Antiserum 89 390 binds proglucagon-derived peptides con-
`taining the amidated carboxy-terminus of GLP-1 [7–36 amide],
`thereby being relatively specific for GLP-1 [7–36 amide] [20].
`Plasma samples with expected high concentrations were di-
`luted 1:10 with assay buffer before analysis.
`Pancreatic glucagon was assayed in ethanol-extracted plas-
`ma using antibody 4305 [21]. GIP was determined using antise-
`rum R 65 and synthetic human GIP for the preparation of stan-
`dards and 125GIP tracer (purified by HPLC) as described by
`Krarup et al. [22]. GIP was not measured in the experiments
`with fasting patients, since GLP-1 [7–36 amide] does not stimu-
`late GIP release in humans [4, 5].
`Each patient’s set of plasma samples was assayed at the
`same time to avoid errors due to inter-assay variation.
`
`Symptoms. During the experiments, the volunteers were ob-
`served and frequently asked about their state of well-being.
`Their answers were recorded using an open questionnaire.
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`Subject characteristics are reported as mean – SD, experimen-
`tal results are reported as mean – SEM. Integration was car-
`ried out according to the trapezoidal rule, separately calculat-
`ing increments over and decrements below mean baseline val-
`ues. Metabolic clearance rates were calculated as the dose of
`s. c. GLP-1 [7–36 amide], divided by the integrated incremental
`response. Significances of differences were tested using re-
`peated measurement analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA;
`NCSS Version 5.01, Kaysville, Utah, USA). If a significant in-
`teraction of treatment and time was documented (p < 0.05),
`values at single time points were compared by Student’s t-test
`(paired analyses; GLP-1 [7–36 amide] vs placebo). For the
`analysis of time courses one-way ANOVA was used, followed
`by t-tests (vs mean basal values), if indicated. For contingency
`table analysis, a chi square-test was used. A two-sided p-value
`less than 0.05 was taken to indicate significant differences.
`
`Results
`
`All patients were hyperglycaemic at the start of the
`experiments (mean plasma glucose concentrations
`over 11 mmol/l; Figs. 1 and 2).
`
`Study A. A single s. c. administration of GLP-1 [7–36
`amide] reduced plasma glucose concentrations by ap-
`proximately 2–3 mmol/l (Fig. 1A), mainly during the
`initial 120 min, but
`the effect was maintained
`throughout the 240-min period. Insulin (Fig. 1B) and
`C-peptide (Fig. 1C) were stimulated (peak 30 min af-
`ter GLP-1 [7–36 amide] administration) significantly,
`
`SAXA-DEF-00003
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`
`M. A. Nauck et al.: Subcutaneous GLP-1 [7–36 amide] effects in NIDDM
`
`1549
`
`Fig. 1. A–H. Effects of single (left panels, A–D) and repeated
`(right panels, E-H) s.c administrations of GLP-1 [7–36 amide]
`(1.5 nmol/kg body weight) on plasma glucose (A, E), insulin
`(B, F) C-peptide (C, G), and glucagon (D, H) concentrations
`in NIDDM patients. Arrows indicate time point of GLP-1 [7–
`36 amide] administration. Experiments with GLP-1 [7–36
`amide] (U) or placebo (k). P-values indicate significance of in-
`teraction of experiment (GLP-1 [7–36 amide] vs placebo) and
`time. *: Differences at specific time points (t-test, p < 0.05)
`
`but transiently, and returned to baseline values after
`90–120 (insulin) and 150–180 (C-peptide) min.
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] concentrations reached peak
`values of around 400–550 pmol/l 30–60 min after s. c.
`administrations of 1.5 nmol/kg body weight GLP-1
`[7–36 amide] (Fig. 2A) and returned to baseline val-
`ues within 120–180 min after injection.
`Glucagon concentrations were transiently, but sig-
`nificantly (p < 0.0001) suppressed during 90 min after
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] administration (Fig. 1D).
`
`Study B. In contrast to the single s. c. administration
`of GLP-1 [7–36 amide], the repeated administration
`(two doses administered at 0 and 120 min) resulted
`in a step-wise normalization of fasting glycaemia in
`NIDDM patients (Fig. 1E; p < 0.0001 vs placebo).
`
`Fig. 2. A–C. Effects of single (A) and repeated (B) s. c. admin-
`istrations of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] (1.5 nmol/kg body weight) in
`the fasting state, and of single (C) s. c. administrations of
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] administered before a liquid test meal on
`plasma GLP-1 [7–36 amide] concentrations in NIDDM pa-
`tients. Arrows indicate time point of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] ad-
`ministration and of the intragastric installation of the meal. Ex-
`periments with GLP-1 [7–36 amide] (U) or placebo (k). P-val-
`ues indicate significance for the interaction of experiment
`(GLP-1 [7–36 amide] vs placebo) and time. *: Differences at
`specific time points (t-test, p < 0.05)
`
`The plasma glucose reached at the end of the experi-
`ment was significantly lower (5.8 – 0.4 mmol/l) than
`after the single dose (8.2 – 0.7 mmol/l; p = 0.0065, t-
`test), while there was no significant difference in the
`integrated decremental response.
`Insulin and C-peptide showed a second increment
`after the administration of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] at
`120 min (Fig. 1F and G), which made the overall insu-
`lin and C-peptide responses greater (p < 0.05 for
`both) than in the experiment with single doses of
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] (Fig. 1B and C). The responses
`of insulin and C-peptide to the second injection of
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] were similar in magnitude to
`those of the first or single administration (Fig. 1F and
`
`SAXA-DEF-00004
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`
`1550
`
`M. A. Nauck et al.: Subcutaneous GLP-1 [7–36 amide] effects in NIDDM
`
`Fig. 4. Effects of single s. c. administrations of GLP-1 [7–36
`amide] (1.5 nmol/kg body weight) on gastric emptying rates af-
`ter the intragastric instillation of a liquid test meal in NIDDM
`patients. Arrow indicates time point of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] ad-
`ministration. Experiments with GLP-1 [7–36 amide] (U) or pla-
`cebo (k). P-values indicate the significance for the interaction
`of experiment (GLP-1 [7–36 amide] vs placebo) and time. *:
`Differences at specific time points (t-test, p < 0.05)
`
`concentrations were reduced significantly (p < 0.0001)
`30 min after each administration (Fig. 1H). The reduc-
`tion in glucagon was similar after the first and second
`injection (p = 0.51). However, the overall reduction
`in glucagon (integrated decremental responses) was
`not significantly different from experiments with a sin-
`gle dose of GLP-1 [7–36 amide].
`
`Study C. Intragastric instillation of a liquid mixed meal
`containing 50 g sucrose, together with the administra-
`tion of placebo, raised mean plasma glucose concen-
`trations to over 15 mmol/l (Fig. 3A). However, with
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] administered s. c. 30 min before
`the meal, plasma glucose values were lowered rather
`than elevated during the initial 30–45 min after the
`meal, with a later rise that was attenuated in compari-
`son with placebo studies (Fig. 3A). The rise in glycae-
`mia over basal values (integrated incremental re-
`sponses), however, was only reduced from 529.2 –
`54.3 mmol (cid:215) l–1 (cid:215) min (placebo) to 318.6 – 106.7 (GLP-
`1 [7–36 amide], which was only of borderline signifi-
`cance (p = 0.051). There was a short increment in insu-
`lin (Fig. 3B) and C-peptide (Fig. 3C) plasma concen-
`trations during the initial 30 min after GLP-1 [7–36
`amide] administration (i. e. before the meal was giv-
`en), but later insulin and C-peptide curves were simi-
`lar to those with the placebo. Due to the initial peak
`in insulin and C-peptide (Fig. 3B and C), the overall in-
`tegrated incremental insulin (21.6 – 4.7 vs 15.9 – 3.8
`nmol (cid:215) l–1 (cid:215) min, p = 0.0032) and C-peptide (139.9 –
`20.6 vs 97.9 – 20.1 nmol (cid:215) l–1 (cid:215) min, p = 0.0054) re-
`sponse was greater with s.c GLP-1 [7–36 amide].
`The time course of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] plasma
`concentrations (Fig. 2C) after s.c injection was similar
`to that described in fasting patients (Fig. 2 A and B,
`Table 2). There was a significant increment in GLP-1
`[7–36 amide] concentrations after the liquid meal
`
`Fig. 3. A–D. Effects of a single s. c. administration of GLP-1
`[7–36 amide] (1.5 nmol/kg body weight) on plasma glucose
`(A), insulin (B), C-peptide (C), and glucagon (D) concentra-
`tions in NIDDM patients before and after feeding a liquid
`test meal. Arrows indicate the time point of GLP-1 [7–36
`amide] administration and of the intragastric instillation of
`the meal. Experiments with GLP-1 [7–36 amide] (U) or placebo
`(k). P-values indicate significance for the interaction of experi-
`ment (GLP-1 [7–36 amide] vs placebo) and time. *: Differ-
`ences at specific time points (t-test, p < 0.05)
`
`G; p = 0.99 and 0.48 for integrated incremental insu-
`lin and C-peptide responses, respectively), although
`plasma glucose concentrations had already been low-
`ered in response to the first injection (Fig. 1E).
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] plasma values showed a sec-
`ond peak of similar magnitude (Fig. 2B), and glucagon
`
`SAXA-DEF-00005
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`
`M. A. Nauck et al.: Subcutaneous GLP-1 [7–36 amide] effects in NIDDM
`
`1551
`
`Table 2. Integrated incremental responses of GLP-1 [7–36
`amide] plasma concentrations after s. c. injection (cf Fig. 2)
`into fasting NIDDM patients and calculated metabolic clear-
`ance rates
`Study
`
`Interval
`[min]
`
`Integrated
`incremental
`GLP-1
`[7–36 amide]
`[nmol (cid:215) l- 1 (cid:215) min- 1]
`39.5 – 11.7
`25.6 – 2.5
`25.4 – 2.2
`40.9 – 5.0
`0.17
`
`Metabolic
`clearance
`rate
`[ml (cid:215) kg- 1 (cid:215) min- 1]
`
`51 – 7
`62 – 5
`62 – 5
`41 – 6b
`0.039
`
`Study A
`Study B
`
`0–240
`0–120
`120–240a
`- 30–240
`
`Study C
`ANOVA
`(p -value)
`Data are mean – SEM
`a Integration was carried out over true baseline values (mea-
`sured at - 15 and 0 min); b significant difference (Student’s t -
`test; p < 0.05) to both periods of study B
`
`with placebo (ANOVA: p = 0.0002, from basal 7 – 1
`to 19 – 3 pmol/l after 30 min, p = 0.002 by t-test, also
`significant vs basal at 45, 75, and 90 min).
`Glucagon concentrations were elevated by the liq-
`uid meal containing amino acids (Fig. 3D) in the pla-
`cebo study, but with s. c. GLP-1 [7–36 amide] there
`was a reduction of glucagon values to below fasting
`values before and shortly after the meal was instilled
`(Fig. 3D). Later, there was a delayed peak of glucagon
`concentrations (at 90 instead of 30 min). The total
`the glucagon response (1347 – 163
`magnitude of
`l–1 (cid:215) min with GLP-1 [7–36 amide] vs 1428 –
`pmol (cid:215)
`205 with placebo), however, was not different between
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] and placebo administration
`(p = 0.53). Plasma GIP concentrations rose in re-
`sponse to the meal (not shown). GLP-1 [7–36 amide]
`administration delayed that increment by approxi-
`mately 45–60 min, also without changing the overall
`response (3386 – 661 vs 4075 – 651 pmol (cid:215) l–1 (cid:215) min,
`p = 0.19).
`Subcutaneous GLP-1 [7–36 amide] delayed gastric
`emptying by 30–45 min, with an initial complete ces-
`sation lasting 30 min (p < 0.0001). Thereafter, the
`time course of gastric emptying was parallel to the
`placebo studies with the s. c. administration of GLP-
`1 [7–36 amide] (Fig. 4). Emptying was near-complete
`after 150 and 180 min, respectively.
`
`Side effects. In study A, one female patient experi-
`enced nausea and vertigo 20 min after the s. c. admin-
`istration of GLP-1 [7–36 amide]. In study B, nausea
`and unproductive vomiting occurred with both the
`first and the second administration of GLP-1 [7–36
`amide] in one male patient. Blood pressure and pulse
`did not change in a clinically relevant fashion during
`these episodes. In study C, no clinically relevant
`side-effects were noted; likewise the placebo caused
`no symptoms.
`
`Pharmacokinetics of GLP-1 [7–36 amide]. Based on
`integrated incremental GLP-1 [7–36 amide] re-
`sponses and the dose administered s. c., an apparent
`metabolic clearance rate of approximately 50 ml (cid:215)
`kg–1 (cid:215) min–1 could be calculated (Table 2).
`
`Discussion
`
`The present results show that, with large doses of s. c.
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide], elevated fasting plasma glucose
`concentrations in NIDDM patients can be normal-
`ized as in previous studies using continuous i. v. ad-
`ministrations of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] or [7–37] [7,
`10], provided that plasma GLP-1 [7–36 amide] con-
`centrations are elevated for a prolonged period of
`time. This was achieved by repeated s. c. injections of
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] (Figs. 1 and 2), but it can be ex-
`trapolated that similar results can be obtained with
`continuous s. c. infusions of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] or
`with a preparation that has retarded absorption ki-
`netics. Such a preparation should elevate plasma
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] levels into the effective concen-
`tration range (~ 100 pmol/l according to previous
`studies [5–7, 10, 11]) for a minimum of 3–4 h [7, 10].
`With such an agent, one could attempt the normaliza-
`tion of fasting glycaemia by an overnight administra-
`tion. Normal fasting glucose concentrations are an
`important determinant of overall glycaemic control
`in NIDDM patients [23, 24].
`It should be considered that not all the GLP-1-like
`material detected by current
`radioimmunoassay
`methods is biologically active GLP-1 [7–36 amide].
`Recent studies have indicated the extent to which
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] is subject to proteolytic attack
`by exopeptidases, giving rise to GLP-1 [9–36 amide],
`which is totally devoid of biological activity [25, 26].
`This has also been shown during the present experi-
`ments (details not shown, see [27]), and is also sug-
`gested if one compares the time course of GLP-1
`[7–36 amide] concentrations (Fig. 2) as measured by
`the C-terminal- (amidation-specific) antibody 89 390
`(see methods) with effects on insulin (Fig. 1B, C, F
`and G) and glucagon secretion (Fig. 1D and H). In
`any case, the duration of elevation of GLP-1 [7–36
`amide] above 100 pmol/l (a concentration that in pre-
`vious studies led to a constant stimulation of insulin
`and the suppression of glucagon secretion [7, 10])
`was longer than the duration of effects on both insu-
`lin and glucagon. This is also evident when interpret-
`ing the time course of inhibition of gastric emptying
`by GLP-1 [7–36 amide]. Such an effect had been no-
`ted under the influence of continuous i. v. infusions
`of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] in normal subjects [28, 29]
`and in NIDDM patients [15, 28]. Furthermore, the in-
`hibition of gastric emptying at plasma levels of 100
`pmol/l was near-complete for a period of at least
`2–4 h [15, 29]. In the present experiments (Fig. 4),
`
`SAXA-DEF-00006
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`
`1552
`
`M. A. Nauck et al.: Subcutaneous GLP-1 [7–36 amide] effects in NIDDM
`
`gastric emptying was completely stopped for approxi-
`mately 30 min (i. e. until 60 min after the s. c. adminis-
`tration of GLP-1 [7–36 amide]), but proceeded at a
`normal rate (as with placebo administration) shortly
`thereafter, although GLP-1 [7–36 amide] plasma val-
`ues remained elevated much longer (Fig. 2C). In in-
`terpreting the gastric emptying data (Fig. 4), the
`somewhat unphysiological composition of the liquid
`meal studied should be kept in mind.
`In comparison to previous studies using s. c. GLP-1
`[7–36 amide] in NIDDM patients, the dose adminis-
`tered was larger in the present examination (approxi-
`mately fivefold in comparison to Gutniak et al. [12]).
`The effects, as expected, were larger and of longer du-
`ration. From the integrated increments in GLP-1 [7–
`36 amide] concentrations (Fig. 2) after s. c. adminis-
`tration (Table 2) and the dose administered (1.5
`nmol/kg), the apparent metabolic clearance rate (ap-
`proximately 50 ml (cid:215) kg–1 (cid:215) min–1) can be calculated, in
`line with previous results in normal subjects [13].
`Since, at plasma concentrations between 100 and 300
`pmol/l, the metabolic clearance rate of GLP-1 [7–36
`amide] infused i. v. was approximately 14 ml (cid:215) kg–1
`(cid:215) min–1 [3–5], and because there is no reason to be-
`lieve that the elimination of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] ab-
`sorbed from s. c. depots should follow different kinet-
`ics compared to that of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] adminis-
`tered directly into the bloodstream, the higher meta-
`bolic clearance rate after s. c. administration (by ap-
`proximately 3.5-fold) probably indicates a reduced
`bioavailability, which can be estimated to be in the or-
`der of 25–30 %. The small differences in integrated
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] responses between experiments
`(Table 2) most likely reflect differences in the inte-
`gration period.
`Serious side-effects were not noted; however, nau-
`sea and vomiting occurred in 2 of 24 patients studied.
`In line with our previous study in normal subjects
`[13], the dose- and concentration range used in the
`present experiments probably comes close to the
`maximum to be used in future clinical trials. Hope-
`fully with a slower release of GLP-1 [7–36 amide]
`from s. c. depots, peak values will be lower and side-
`effects should be less likely.
`As in previous studies [6, 12], the fall in plasma
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] or [7–37] concentrations after
`administration before a meal resulted in a rebound
`increment of plasma glucose (Fig. 3A),
`insulin
`(Fig. 3B) and C-peptide (Fig. 3C), when the stomach
`started to empty again (Fig. 4). Therefore, the reduc-
`tion in glycaemia was seen only transiently, and the
`overall effect on the integrated incremental glucose
`concentrations was of borderline significance only
`(p = 0.051). This may be due to the fact that the ab-
`sorption of meal components is only slightly post-
`poned by the administration of GLP-1 [7–36 amide],
`as also suggested by the glucagon (Fig. 3D) and
`GIP responses, which remained similar in overall
`
`magnitude with the s. c. administration of GLP-1 [7–
`36 amide], although their time course was consider-
`ably different
`in comparison to placebo studies
`(Fig. 3D). If, in fact, glucose concentrations can be
`normalized in hyperglycaemic NIDDM patients, as
`has been shown with i. v. GLP-1 [7–36 amide] adminis-
`trations [7, 10], the effects on gastric emptying of
`GLP-1 [7–36 amide] administered with meals may be-
`come the most predominant effect, since the actions
`on insulin and glucagon secretion are glucose-depen-
`dent [7, 10, 30] and will be of less magnitude at de-
`creasing blood glucose levels. Along this line, the
`self-limited stimulation of insulin secretion during
`the i. v. administration of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] [7, 10]
`probably was, the consequence of the glucose-depen-
`dence of this effect. In study B, the second injection
`of GLP-1 [7–36 amide] was still able to stimulate insu-
`lin secretion, because normoglycaemia had not been
`reached with the first dose administered 120 min ear-
`lier. An alternative explanation is that the beta cells
`had been “primed” by the first injection, which may
`even potentiate secretory responses to a second stim-
`ulation, as has been shown in animal experiments [31].
`Based on these considerations, one may speculate
`that better use can be made of GLP-1 [7–36 amide]
`in the fasting state than in association with meal in-
`gestion,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket