throbber
Chem Sig Events
`
`April 26, 1999
`
`Executive Summary: Nothing to report
`
`Competitive Update: No new developments.
`
`The goal of the program is to discover smail molecule inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DP-4)
`for use in the treatment and prevention of diabetes.
`lnhtbition of DP—4 should prevent
`the
`degradation of GLP—1 and potentiate its actions in vivo. We have been working to identify novel
`and proprietary conformationally restricted dipeptide scaffolds which would mimic the binding
`interaction of the known DP4 inhibitor BlVlS-326430 (lle—Pyrrolidide). Since this inhibitor can adopt
`a variety of configurations (two of which are shown below), emphasis has been placed towards
`generating lactams A and E3 which differ in their placement of the key pharmacophores required
`for binding to the enzyme.
`
`
`
`
`
`Me
`
`Me
`
`0
`
`O =
`” M./akr
`
`"H2
`‘.
`
`Me 0
`
`:
`
`BMS~3264-30
`
`O :>
`
`N
`
`R
`
`H
`
`O
`
`A
`
`)1"! H
`
`~«~ *3
`hr“
`
`0
`
`3
`
`the assay has now been completed utilizing purified pig kidney DP4
`Full automation of
`(inhibitorlenzyme preincubation time of 5 minutes).
`in the “exo" amino bicyclic series (generic
`Structure A), four new compounds which attempted to incorporate a requisite hydrophobic group
`in the scaffold (geminal dimethyl
`for BMS-345588 and BMS~3464-7'6, benzyl
`for Bil/IS-
`345698/BMS—345699, and propyl for BMS-345623) were assayed. None of the compounds
`elicited significant
`inhibition at 10 uM. Based on recent modeling results performed by the
`Macromolecular Structure Group, future emphasis will be placed in generating the related bicyclic
`azocine (8_.5—fused ring structure) which should better adopt the low energy conformation of BMS—
`325430.
`
`Z‘
`
`M; S g
`N\/
`’- X’;->\
`
`Me
`
`"2"
`
`]/
`0
`
`H2“
`
`0
`
`H Kl
`Me, 5
`u\\\ 75
`ME -F
`
`\\
`
`H2N
`
`H
`
`N
`
`*
`
`0
`
`H
`
`N
`
`M
`
`e/\ at
`
`H2N
`
`0
`
`BMS-345588
`
`BNES-346476
`
`BMS—345698
`('3°m9l' A at 9')
`BMS-345599
`
`BMs-345523
`(single isomer at *)
`
`(isomer B at *)
`in our last report it was stated that the "endo” amino bicyclic compound BMS—309909 exhibited
`significant inhibition of human DP4 at 10 uM upon 30 min incubation with the enzyme. Recent
`testing of this compound versus the pig kidney enzyme showed no inhibition with this compound.
`A retest versus human DP4 will be performed once additional enzyme is avaiiable. The 6,5—fused
`compound Bil/|S~344554 and the 7,5-fused compounds BMS-346575 and BMS-346587, designed
`to incorporate a requisite hydrophobic interaction in the molecules, were inactive against pig
`kidney DP4. Again, based on modeling results, future emphasis will be placed on generating the
`related 8,5-fused systems with special emphasis on the effect of stereochernistry at
`the
`bridgehead center.
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`Astraleneca Exhibit 2183
`Mylan V. Astraleneca
`IPR2015-0,13-l0,
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2183
`Mylan v. AstraZeneca
`IPR2015-01340
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`
`O
`
`BNIS-339909
`
`0'
`
`BMS-344554
`(‘10:1 mixture at *)
`
`/\“-.
`
`O
`
`EMS-346575
`
`BMS-346587
`(1 :1 mixture at *)
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`Page 2 of 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket