throbber
THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
`© 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
`
`Vol. 274, No. 48, Issue of November 26, pp. 34053–34058, 1999
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`Sequence, Purification, and Cloning of an Intracellular Serine
`Protease, Quiescent Cell Proline Dipeptidase*
`
`(Received for publication, April 5, 1999, and in revised form, September 13, 1999)
`
`Robert Underwood, Murali Chiravuri, Henry Lee, Tracy Schmitz, Alisa K. Kabcenell‡,
`Kurt Yardley§, and Brigitte T. Huber¶
`From the Department of Pathology, Program in Immunology, Tufts University School of Medicine,
`Boston, Massachusetts 02111 and the ‡Department of Immunological Diseases,
`Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877
`
`We recently observed that specific inhibitors of post-
`proline cleaving aminodipeptidases cause apoptosis in
`quiescent lymphocytes in a process independent of
`CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV. These results led to the
`isolation and cloning of a new protease that we have
`termed quiescent cell proline dipeptidase (QPP). QPP
`activity was purified from CD262 Jurkat T cells. The
`protein was identified by labeling with [3H]diisopropy-
`lfluorophosphate and subjected to tryptic digestion and
`partial amino acid sequencing. The peptide sequences
`were used to identify expressed sequence tag clones.
`The cDNA of QPP contains an open reading frame of
`1476 base pairs, coding for a protein of 492 amino acids.
`The amino acid sequence of QPP reveals similarity with
`prolylcarboxypeptidase. The putative active site resi-
`dues serine, aspartic acid, and histidine of QPP show an
`ordering of the catalytic triad similar to that seen in the
`post-proline cleaving exopeptidases prolylcarboxypep-
`tidase and CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV. The post-pro-
`line cleaving activity of QPP has an unusually broad pH
`range in that it is able to cleave substrate molecules at
`acidic pH as well as at neutral pH. QPP has also been
`detected in nonlymphocytic cell lines, indicating that
`this enzyme activity may play an important role in other
`tissues as well.
`
`There are relatively few enzymes that have the ability to
`cleave proline-containing peptide bonds. These include exopep-
`tidases such as dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD26/DPPIV),1 dipep-
`tidyl peptidase II (DPPII), and prolylcarboxypeptidase (PCP,
`angiotensinase C; Ref. 1). CD26/DPPIV is a ubiquitously ex-
`pressed molecule found on the cell membrane and in a secreted
`
`form (2, 3). CD26 was recently shown to cleave dipeptides off
`the amino terminus of chemokines such as regulated on acti-
`vation, normal T cell expressed and secreted, stromal-derived
`factor 1, and macrophage derived chemokine, altering the bio-
`logical activity of these molecules (4–6). DPPII and PCP are
`both found in lysosomes. DPPII has a similar substrate speci-
`ficity to CD26/DPPIV but is only active at acidic pH (7). PCP,
`however, is a post-proline cleaving activity that liberates amino
`acids from the carboxyl terminus of proteins (8).
`We recently observed that inhibitors of post-proline cleaving
`aminodipeptidases cause apoptosis in quiescent lymphocytes
`but not activated or transformed lymphocytes (9). This apopto-
`sis is not mediated by CD26, because CD262 and CD261 cells
`both undergo apoptosis in response to the addition of these
`inhibitors (9). Closer analysis revealed an intracellular post-
`proline cleaving aminodipeptidase activity that was functional
`at neutral and acidic pH.
`In this paper we report the purification and sequence of a
`post-proline cleaving aminodipeptidase that we have termed
`quiescent cell proline dipeptidase (QPP), according to its func-
`tional properties. The post-proline cleaving activity was puri-
`fied 1000-fold by following the cleavage of the reporter sub-
`strates Ala-Pro-7-amino-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin (AFC) and
`Gly-Pro-paranitroanilide (pNA). The active-site serine contain-
`ing protein was identified by labeling with [3H]diisopropylflu-
`orophosphate (DFP). Peptide sequencing of this protein pro-
`vided us with four peptides, which were used to identify cDNAs
`from the Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) data base. The QPP
`cDNA contains an open reading frame of 1476 base pairs coding
`for a 492-amino acid protein. This protein has strong sequence
`homology with PCP but little similarity to CD26/DPPIV. We
`show that the QPP cDNA codes for a fully functional enzyme
`with Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activity. Unlike the reported activ-
`ity of DPPII and DPPIV (7), however, QPP is active at both
`acidic and neutral pH. This enzyme may play a role in the
`regulation of the large number of proteins that contain a con-
`served amino-terminal Xaa-Pro motif (1).
`
`* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Research
`Grants AI36696 and AI43469 (to B.T.H.). The costs of publication of this
`article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This
`article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance
`with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted
`to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF154502.
`‡ Supported by National Institutes of Health Training Grant
`T32AR07570.
`§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology,
`Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA
`02111. Tel.: 617-636-6905; Fax: 617-636-0449; E-mail: bhuber@
`opal.tufts.edu.
`1 The abbreviations used are: DPPIV, dipeptidyl peptidase IV; DPPII
`dipeptidyl peptidase II; QPP, quiescent cell proline dipeptidase; VbP,
`Val-boro-Pro; PCP, prolylcarboxypeptidase; PBMC, peripheral blood
`mononuclear cell; AFC, amino-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin; pNA, para-
`nitroanilide; DFP, diisopropylfluorophosphate; EST, Expressed Se-
`quence Tag; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; S-110, 110,000 3
`g supernatant; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; HEPBS,
`N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N9-(4-butanesulfonic acid).
`
`This paper is available on line at http://www.jbc.org
`
`EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
`Materials—The peptidase inhibitors Lys-thiazolidide, Lys-piperi-
`dide, and Val-boro-Pro (VbP) were provided by R. Snow (Boehringer
`Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Ridgefield, CT). L-125 was provided by
`J. T. Welch (State University New York, Albany, NY; see Fig. 1). Frozen
`pellets of Jurkat cells were provided by R. Barton (Boehringer In-
`gelheim). All chromatography media and Ficoll-Hypaque were pur-
`chased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Aim V cell culture medium
`was purchased from Life Technologies. [3H]DFP and [3H]Enhance were
`purchased from NEN Life Science Products. Ala-Pro-AFC and AFC
`were purchased from Enzyme Systems Products (Dublin, CA). Protein
`concentrations were determined using the Coomassie Plus protein as-
`say reagent purchased from Pierce, and centrifugal concentrators were
`purchased from Ambion (Austin, TX). Rapid amplification of cDNA
`ends (RACE) polymerase chain reaction was performed using the Mar-
`34053
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2167
`Mylan v. AstraZeneca
`IPR2015-01340
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`

`34054
`
`QPP, an Amino-terminal Proline-specific Dipeptidase
`
`athon cDNA amplification kit, and human leukocyte Marathon-Ready
`cDNA was purchased from CLONTECH. DNA sequencing and oligonu-
`cleotide synthesis was performed at the protein analysis facility (Tufts
`University). The TA cloning vector pCR2.1 was purchased from Invitro-
`gen (Carlsbad, CA). All EST clones were purchased from ATCC. All
`additional reagents were purchased from Sigma.
`Preparation of a Soluble Fraction of Ala-Pro-AFC Cleaving Activity—
`Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs; ;4.3 3 108 cells)
`were isolated from 450 ml of whole blood by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient.
`The PBMCs were washed three times in cold phosphate-buffered saline
`and resuspended in 7 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer (0.02 M Tris, pH 7.8, 4
`mg/ml aprotinin, 8 mg/ml leupeptin, 8 mg/ml antipain, 5 mM EDTA) and
`lysed by Dounce homogenization. The homogenate was centrifuged at
`1000 3 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed and centri-
`fuged at 45,000 3 g for 20 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant was
`removed and centrifuged at 110,000 3 g for 1 h at 4 °C. The110,000 3
`g supernatant (S-110) was used as a source of soluble cellular proteins.
`For preparation of S-110 from Jurkat cells, a 68 g (wet weight) frozen
`pellet of these cells was subjected to the same homogenization and
`centrifugation procedure used to prepare S-110 from PBMCs. For prep-
`aration of S-110 from 293T human fibroblasts expressing QPP cDNA,
`;1.8 3 108 cells were lysed in 5 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer containing
`0.02 M phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, instead of 0.02 M Tris and
`then subjected to the same homogenization and centrifugation proce-
`dure used to prepare S-110 from PBMCs.
`Purification of the Soluble Ala-Pro-AFC-Cleaving Activity—30 ml of
`Jurkat S-110 (corresponding to 17 g of cells) was dialyzed (molecular
`mass cutoff, 2 kDa) overnight at 4 °C against 4 liters of 50 mM acetic
`acid, titrated to pH 4.5 with NaOH. The protein sample was clarified by
`centrifugation at 1000 3 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The clarified supernatant
`was concentrated on a Centricon 50 membrane to ;10 ml. The concen-
`trated sample was loaded onto a 3-ml HiTrap SP-Sepharose column and
`equilibrated with 50 mM acetate, pH 4.5 (start buffer). The column was
`washed with 10 column volumes of start buffer and eluted with a linear
`0–300 mM NaCl gradient in start buffer. 0.5-ml fractions were collected
`and assayed for cleavage of Gly-Pro-pNA. Active fractions were pooled
`and concentrated to ;1 ml on a Centricon 50 membrane and then to
`;0.2 ml on a Microcon 30 membrane. The concentrated material was
`loaded onto a Superdex 12 gel filtration column and equilibrated with
`50 mM acetate, pH 4.5, 150 mM NaCl. The column was eluted with the
`same buffer, and 0.5-ml fractions were collected and assayed for Gly-
`Pro-pNA cleavage. Active fractions were pooled and used as a purified
`preparation of the activity. The soluble Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activity of
`the QPP cDNA-transfected 293T human fibroblasts was partially puri-
`fied by using a gel filtration column and then an ion exchange column,
`in a similar manner as above. CD26/DPPIV was purified from pig
`kidney as described previously (10).
`[3H]DFP Labeling—5 mg (total protein) of purified Ala-Pro-AFC
`cleaving activity was mixed with [3H]DFP (specific activity 8.4, Ci/
`mmol) at a final concentration of 12 mM in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, and
`incubated at room temperature for 60 min. SDS loading buffer was
`added, and the reaction was boiled and separated by SDS-polyacryl-
`amide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). A control reaction without [3H]DFP
`was run in parallel on the same gel. The control lane was silver-stained,
`and the labeled lane was equilibrated first in [3H]Enhance and then 3%
`glycerol. The gels were dried, and the labeled gel was exposed to film.
`Enzymatic Assays—DPPIV-like activity was assayed by fluorogenic
`or chromogenic assays. In the fluorescence assay, peptidase activity was
`measured by monitoring the accumulation of AFC liberated from the
`substrate Ala-Pro-AFC for 1 min, using a Perkin-Elmer fluorescence
`spectrometer (excitation, 400 nm; emission, 505 nm). Assays were car-
`ried out in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, containing 10 mM Ala-Pro-AFC. In
`the chromogenic assay, pNA liberated from the substrate Gly-Pro-pNA
`(1 mM) was measured by absorbance at 410 nm. Plates were read on an
`MR700 plate reader (Dynatech Inc.). The Km for the cleavage of Ala-
`Pro-AFC was determined by assaying a standard amount of activity at
`several concentrations of substrate in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5. Km was
`calculated by standard transformation of the Henri-Michaelis-Menten
`equation. The Ki for VbP was determined by assaying a standard
`amount of Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activity and several concentrations of
`inhibitor.
`pH profile—Purified QPP was added to 150 ml of 20 mM Ala-Pro-AFC
`in one of the following buffers: 170 mM cacodylate buffer (pH range,
`4.0–7.0, in increments of 0.5), 50 mM HEPES (pH range, 6.5–8.5, in
`increments of 0.5), and 50 mM HEPBS (pH range, 7.5–9.0, in increments
`of 0.5). The liberation of AFC from the substrate Ala-Pro-AFC was
`measured using a fluorescent plate reader at excitation 390 nm and
`emission 510 nm (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).
`
`Preparative SDS-PAGE—To prepare QPP for tryptic digestion and
`amino acid sequence analysis, the active fractions from the Superdex 12
`column were concentrated to ;60 ml and neutralized by the addition of
`5 ml 100 mM Tris, pH 7.8. SDS loading buffer was added, and the sample
`was boiled before separation by SDS-PAGE. After running, the gel was
`fixed in 50% methanol, 10% acetic acid for 15 min and then stained with
`Coomassie Blue R-250. The 55-kDa band was excised and washed with
`water and with 50% high-performance liquid chromatography grade
`acetonitrile. The final wash was decanted, and the gel slice was snap-
`frozen in N2.
`Data Base Searches and Sequence Comparisons—Peptide sequences
`were used to identify homologous proteins and EST clones using BLAST
`at the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Searches of
`Swissprot for proteins with homology to QPP were performed using
`FASTA3 at the European Bioinformatics Institute. Multiple alignment
`of homologous sequences was performed using CLUSTAL W at the
`European Bioinformatics Institute.
`Cloning of QPP—EST 69230 was supplied in pBluescript at EcoRI-
`XhoI (ATCC). The 59 end of the QPP cDNA was isolated from human
`leukocyte cDNA, using the Marathon 59 RACE system. The primary
`amplification mixture contained 1 3 polymerase chain reaction buffer,
`0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.2 mM primer AP1, 0.5 ng of adapter-ligated human
`leukocyte cDNA, 1 3 KlenTaq polymerase mix, and 0.2 mM QPP-
`specific primer BBE1R (ACTCTGGCCCTCAAAGTCCGCCGTG). The
`products of this reaction were diluted 50-fold with 10 mM Tricine-KOH,
`pH 8.5, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 15 ml was used as template for a nested
`amplification, using 0.2 mM primer AP2, and 0.2 mM nested QPP-
`specific primer BBE2R (GCCGAGGCCTGCCACAGCTAGAACG). A
`prominent band of 600 base pairs was excised, extracted from the gel,
`and TA-cloned into pCR2.1. Several clones were isolated and se-
`quenced. All contained ;200 base pairs of 39 sequence that overlapped
`with EST 69230. To assemble a full-length cDNA, EST 69230 was
`digested with NotI and MstII. The 59 RACE product was excised from
`pCR2.1 by digestion with NotI and MstII. The 59 RACE product and
`pBluescript containing the 39 sequences of EST 69230 were gel purified
`and ligated together, generating a full-length cDNA in pBluescript.
`Transfection of QPP into 293T Fibroblasts—QPP cDNA was polym-
`erase chain reaction-amplified with primers containing XhoI and EcoRI
`restriction sites using DeepVent polymerase (New England Biolabs).
`This was cloned into the pCI-neo expression vector (Promega) and
`transfected into 293T fibroblasts using the calcium phosphate method
`(11). Lysates from transient transfectants were assayed for Ala-Pro-
`AFC cleaving activity, as described above. Stable lines of 293T cells
`were used as a source of recombinant QPP for analysis of pH optima
`and inhibitor analysis.
`Northern Analysis—Total RNA was isolated from resting PBMCs
`and Jurkat cells using the TRIZOL kit (Life Technologies). 20 mg of total
`RNA per lane was loaded from each sample. 32P-labeled QPP cDNA was
`used to probe the Northern blot.
`
`RESULTS
`Novel Intracellular DPPIV-like Activity in Lymphocytes—
`Functional analyses revealed that culturing PBMCs with
`CD26/DPPIV inhibitors led to apoptosis in resting lymphocytes
`(9). CD26/DPPIV, a T cell surface molecule, was excluded as a
`target for this death-inducing activity, because both CD261
`and CD262 lymphocytes were equally sensitive to apoptosis
`induction in the presence of the DPPIV inhibitors (9). To search
`for a novel DPPIV-like activity, a soluble fraction of PBMCs
`was prepared. This fraction contained proteolytic activity that
`cleaved the CD26/DPPIV substrate Ala-Pro-AFC (data not
`shown). The activity was inhibited by VbP (Ref. 12; see Fig. 1
`for structure) in the micromolar range but only partially inhib-
`ited by millimolar concentrations of serine- and cysteine-pro-
`tease inhibitors with broad specificity (Table I). We analyzed
`the ability of various DPPIV inhibitors to block QPP activity.
`As can be seen in Table I, Lys-thiazolidide and Lys-piperidide
`inhibit QPP with similar Ki values to VbP, whereas L-125 (see
`Fig. 1. for structure) does not.
`Because PBMCs contain CD261 cells, and a large quantity of
`blood would be required to isolate enough PBMCs to purify the
`activity, the soluble fraction of CD262 Jurkat T cells was used
`as a source for Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activity. We analyzed the
`Km values of the purified Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activities from
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`

`QPP, an Amino-terminal Proline-specific Dipeptidase
`
`34055
`
`FIG. 2. Biochemical analysis of Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activity.
`A, kinetic analyses. Km and Ki values of the Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving
`activity purified from the cytosol of PBMCs and Jurkat cells, respec-
`tively, were compared, using Ala-Pro-AFC as substrate and VbP as
`inhibitor. B, substrate specificity of the Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activity
`for various alanine-and proline-containing peptide-pNA substrates was
`tested using purified Jurkat QPP. - -, undetectable activity; Z, benzyl
`blocking group on the amino terminus that blocks QPP-mediated cleav-
`age of the substrates.
`
`TABLE II
`Purification of QPP
`Protein Activitya Specific activity Purification Yield
`
`Fraction
`
`FIG. 1. Inhibitors of post-proline aminodipeptidases. R, a
`polypeptide; Rp, (4-NO2)-Z; Rpp, (4-NO2)-C6H4.
`
`TABLE I
`Inhibition profile of QPP
`
`Inhibitor
`
`Concentration
`
`% Inhibition
`
`VbP
`Antipain
`Leupeptin
`Phenymethylsulfenyl fluoride
`Benzamidine
`N-ethylmaleimide
`Iodoacetimide
`
`1 mM
`1 mM
`1 mM
`1 mM
`1 mM
`1 mM
`1 mM
`
`CD26/DPPIV
`inhibitors
`
`VbP
`Lys-thiazolidide
`Lys-piperidide
`L-125
`a ND, not determined.
`
`Ki (nM)
`
`nM
`
`CD26
`
`2
`NDa
`ND
`188
`
`%
`85
`0
`12
`36
`35
`27
`24
`
`QPP
`
`125
`145
`300
`.1000
`
`PBMCs and Jurkat T cells and found them to be similar. Both
`PBMC and Jurkat activities are inhibited by VbP with a Ki of
`125 nM (Fig. 2A). From these studies we concluded that the
`Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activity found in the soluble fraction of
`PBMCs and Jurkat cells is attributable to the same enzyme,
`and we used Jurkat cells as a source of the activity for
`purification.
`Biochemical Isolation of QPP—The soluble Ala-Pro-AFC-
`cleavage activity, termed QPP, was purified from the soluble
`fraction of Jurkat cells by the removal of an acid-insoluble,
`denatured fraction, followed by column chromatography on
`SP-Sepharose and Superose 12. At each step fractions were
`assayed for cleavage of the chromogenic substrate Gly-Pro-
`pNA. Active fractions were combined and further purified. The
`Gly-Pro-pNA cleaving activity eluted as a single peak from all
`chromatography columns, and this scheme provided a 1000-
`fold purification of the activity with 27% yield (Table II). Acid
`precipitation removed ;75% of the bulk protein with a 131%
`recovery of Ala-Pro-AFC-cleaving activity. This increased ac-
`tivity was most likely attributable to the removal of an acid-
`insoluble inhibitor. However, from the purification it is impos-
`sible to distinguish whether the cytosolic fraction contained
`inhibitors or natural substrates of QPP activity. Cellular sub-
`strates could compete with Ala-Pro-AFC, thus acting as com-
`petitive inhibitors. Similar to CD26/DPPIV, which cleaves ami-
`
`mg
`480
`109
`
`5
`
`mU
`1119
`1466
`
`994
`
`mU/mg
`2
`13
`
`199
`
`S-110
`Acetate
`Supernatant
`SP
`Sepharose
`1004
`2007
`301
`0.15
`Superdex-12
`a Units defined as the cleavage of 1 mmol of substrate/min.
`
`fold
`
`7
`
`100
`
`%
`100
`131
`
`89
`
`27
`
`no-terminal dipeptides when the penultimate amino acid is
`proline or, to a lesser extent, alanine (13), the purified QPP
`activity is an amino dipeptidase that degrades substrates with
`prolyl and, to a lesser extent, alanyl residues in the penulti-
`mate position. Purified QPP activity is devoid of amino pepti-
`dase activity and does not cleave model substrates with blocked
`amino termini (Fig. 2B).
`The Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activity of purified QPP is active
`over a broad pH range, from acidic to neutral pH (pH 5.0–7.5;
`Fig. 3). The Ala-Pro-AFC-cleaving activity is clearly detectable
`from pH 4.0–7.5. When incubated in 170 mM cacodylate buffer,
`a peak of maximum activity was detected at an acidic pH of 5.5,
`whereas a similar amount of activity was seen at pH 7.0 with
`HEPES buffer. The Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activity was lower
`(69%) at pH 7.0 with the cacodylate buffer than the HEPES
`buffer, and this may be attributable to the fact that this pH is
`out of the range of the buffering capacity of cacodylate buffer.
`In both HEPES and HEPBS buffers the activity clearly drops
`off at pH 8.0 and is completely undetectable by pH 8.5.
`The activity eluted from gel filtration with an apparent mo-
`lecular size of 120 kDa. SDS-PAGE revealed the presence of
`several polypeptides in the purified preparation but no
`polypeptide of 120 kDa (Fig. 4A), indicating that the native
`enzyme may be multimeric or exist as a complex. The catalytic
`polypeptide was identified using the irreversible inhibitor of
`serine-type proteases DFP. First, DFP was shown to inhibit the
`purified activity (Fig. 4B), and then an aliquot of the purified
`activity was incubated with [3H]DFP and analyzed by SDS-
`PAGE and radiofluorography. As can be seen in Fig. 4A, a
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`34056
`
`QPP, an Amino-terminal Proline-specific Dipeptidase
`
`FIG. 4. Purification of QPP. A, silver stain and [3H]DFP labeling of
`active site serine of 1000-fold enriched fraction run on SDS-PAGE and
`visualized by autoradiography. B, inhibition profile of QPP Ala-Pro-
`AFC cleaving activity by DFP. Untreated QPP showed an activity of
`2.03 3 103 nM min21 mg21.
`
`tide sequence of the full-length cDNA encoding QPP was un-
`ambiguously determined by sequencing both strands.
`The cDNA encodes a protein of 492 amino acids with a
`predicted molecular mass of 54.3 kDa. It appears to contain the
`complete open reading frame, because the nucleotide sequence
`around the initiating methionine conforms to the Kozak con-
`sensus (14), and the cDNA contains a polyadenylation signal
`and poly(A) tail. Furthermore, the QPP cDNA contains the
`consensus sequence for the active-site serine residue of serine-
`type proteases, Gly-Xaa-Ser-Xaa-Gly (Fig. 5A). As Fig. 5B
`shows, QPP protein bears strong homology to PCP (Ref. 8; 42%
`identity), particularly at the putative active site residues. It is
`interesting that these two post-proline cleaving enzymes have
`strong sequence homology, even though QPP is an aminodipep-
`tidase, whereas PCP is a carboxypeptidase. QPP also shows
`homology to hypothetical proteins obtained from the Caenorh-
`abditis elegans EST data base (Fig. 5 C). There is a remarkable
`conservation at and around the active-site residues, suggesting
`an evolutionary link.
`QPP cDNA Codes for a Functionally Active Protease—North-
`ern blot analysis of Jurkat T cells and PBMCs shows that QPP
`is expressed in both of these cell types (Fig. 6A). Using a QPP
`cDNA probe the Northern analysis revealed a band of 1.7
`kilobases that corresponds to QPP. To determine whether the
`QPP cDNA encodes an active protease, we transfected 293T
`human fibroblasts with QPP cDNA cloned into the pCIneo
`expression vector. Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activity was measured
`from lysates of these samples at neutral pH. We found that
`extracts of fibroblasts transfected with the QPP cDNA con-
`tained severalfold higher specific Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activ-
`ity than cells transfected with the pCI-neo vector alone (Fig.
`6B). Recombinant QPP exhibits a pH profile similar to that of
`native QPP (Fig. 3B). The discrepency between the units of
`
`FIG. 3. pH profile of purified QPP. Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activity
`was assayed using 170 mM cacodylate, 50 mM HEPES, or 50 mM HEPBS
`buffer. A, native QPP purified from Jurkat cells. B, recombinant QPP
`expressed in 293T human fibroblasts.
`
`single polypeptide of 58 kDa was labeled compared with three
`bands seen by silver staining. The corresponding band was
`excised from a Coomassie Blue-stained gel and submitted for
`tryptic digestion and amino acid sequence analysis (Harvard
`Microchemistry Facility).
`Cloning of cDNA Encoding QPP—Four peptides were suc-
`cessfully isolated and sequenced (Fig. 5A). The peptide se-
`quences were used as virtual probes to search translations of
`the EST data base. Four overlapping EST clones were identi-
`fied and sequenced. The largest clone, EST 69230, contained
`1.23 kilobases of sequence including a polyadenylation signal
`and poly(A) tail and encoded the three peptides obtained from
`the tryptic digest, GT69, GT103, and GT148. The 59 end of the
`cDNA was isolated by RACE polymerase chain reaction from
`human leukocyte cDNA and was found to encode the fourth
`peptide, GT85. The RACE product was ligated to EST 69230 at
`MstII to form a full-length cDNA of 1.7 kilobases. The nucleo-
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`

`QPP, an Amino-terminal Proline-specific Dipeptidase
`
`34057
`
`FIG. 6. Recombinant QPP is functional and similar to native
`QPP. A, Northern blot analysis of Jurkat clone J7.7 and PBMCs using
`a full-length QPP probe. B, Ala-Pro-AFC cleaving activity of lysates
`made from control (vector-transfected) and QPP cDNA-transfected
`293T cells. Experiments were done in triplicate, and error bars repre-
`sent S.D. C, recombinant QPP has a similar Ki for VbP as native QPP
`and shows the same level of inhibition with phenylmethylsulfonyl
`fluoride.
`
`DISCUSSION
`QPP was biochemically purified from CD26/DPPIV2 Jurkat
`cells, sequenced, and cloned. The translated product contains
`the consensus sequence for the active site of a serine-type
`protease, in agreement with the aminodipeptidase inhibitor
`profile. The purified activity eluted from gel filtration chroma-
`tography with an apparent molecular size of 120 kDa but ran
`as a [3H]DFP-labeled band of 58 kDa on SDS-PAGE, indicating
`that the native enzyme may be oligomeric or exist as a complex.
`A search of the Swissprot data base for similar proteins pro-
`duced surprising results: PCP (8) bore significant amino acid
`sequence homology to QPP, whereas CD26/DPPIV did not. The
`sequence of QPP also bears similarity to the limited sequence
`available of porcine DPPII (15). It is interesting to note that
`there is significant protein homology between human QPP and
`three C. elegans proteins. Such conservation may imply an
`important role for this gene family.
`Alignment of QPP and PCP revealed a striking degree of
`sequence conservation around the active-site residues of PCP
`(Fig. 5). Serine-type peptidases catalyze the hydrolysis of pep-
`tide bonds through a charge relay system. This catalytic mech-
`anism is dependent on three active-site amino acid residues,
`serine, histidine, and aspartic acid. These residues are scat-
`
`FIG. 5. QPP sequence and alignments. A, deduced amino acid
`sequence of QPP, showing tryptic peptide overlap (underline) and con-
`sensus sequence for the active-site serine residue of serine-type pro-
`teases Gly-Xaa-Ser-Xaa-Gly (double underline). B, sequence alignment
`of QPP and PCP. Stars indicate identity, and active-site residues are
`shown in boldface. C, amino acid alignment of the active-site residues
`for QPP, PCP, and the three C. elegans hypothetical proteins YO26,
`YOG1, and YM67. Sequences around the active-site residues are shown
`in boldface.
`
`specific activity of the pH profiles of the native and recombi-
`nant QPP is attributable to the fact that the recombinant QPP
`was only partially purified. This presence of extraneous pro-
`teins results in a decrease in specific activity. However, the
`general trends of the pH profile mirror those of native QPP.
`Additionally, recombinant QPP has a similar Ki for VbP as
`native QPP and exhibits the same level of inhibition with
`phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Fig. 6C). These results show
`that the cloned cDNA is full-length and encodes an active QPP
`protease, the activities and characteristics of which mimic the
`native QPP.
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`

`34058
`
`QPP, an Amino-terminal Proline-specific Dipeptidase
`
`tered throughout the primary structure of the protein but are
`brought into close proximity in the properly folded enzyme,
`forming the active site. Identification of the positions of these
`amino acids either experimentally or by comparison of the
`sequences of homologous enzymes is useful for the classifica-
`tion of the serine proteases into families, which are further
`grouped into clans. The members of a clan are groups of fam-
`ilies thought to have common ancestry (16, 17), preferably
`identified by similarities in tertiary structure. However, the
`tertiary structure of most enzymes is unknown; therefore, the
`order of the catalytic residues in the sequence is commonly
`used. The catalytic residues in the sequences of QPP and PCP
`are ordered serine, aspartic acid, and histidine. This arrange-
`ment and the homology of QPP and PCP (42% amino acid
`identity over their entire open reading frame) place QPP in the
`serine-type peptidase clan SC, family S28, with PCP. Recently,
`DPPII was assigned to this family, based on its amino-terminal
`sequence similarity to PCP and specificity for prolyl bonds (17).
`As mentioned earlier, QPP and DPPII may be closely related
`despite certain differences in physical properties.
`In terms of substrate specificity, QPP resembles CD26/DP-
`PIV and DPPII. QPP and CD26/DPPIV, however, have dissim-
`ilar cDNA structures and no significant amino acid homology.
`Furthermore, a detailed analysis of QPP and CD26/DPPIV
`activity revealed differences in their inhibitor profiles, indicat-
`ing differences in the catalytic sites of the two proteases. Before
`obtaining the QPP cDNA, we had assumed that QPP and
`CD26/DPPIV had evolved from a common ancestral gene. Al-
`though this is clearly not the case, our results indicate that
`QPP is related to DPPII and PCP.
`It is interesting to note that QPP is able to cleave the sub-
`strate Ala-Pro-AFC over a broad pH range, from acidic to
`neutral pH. Typically, enzymes do not exhibit activity over
`such a wide pH range. There are a few exceptions, however,
`including cathepsin B, a cysteine protease that catalyzes toxin
`proteolysis in endosomes, which is active from acidic to neutral
`pH (18). Recent results show that QPP may indeed localize to
`the endosomal and lysosomal compartment and a secretory
`pathway,2 explaining its ability to function over a broad pH
`range. Further work is being done to explore these and other
`possibilities.
`Although QPP is expressed in resting and activated PBMCs
`as well as Jurkat cells, we have observed that blocking QPP
`leads to cell death exclusively in resting PBMCs (9). It is likely
`that QPP has many substrates that are processed in the cell,
`only some of which are necessary for survival of resting PB-
`MCs. Activated PBMCs and transformed cells are very differ-
`ent from resting cells in both gene expression and cell cycle
`
`2 M. Chiravuri, F. Agarraberes, S. Hurta, K. Yardley, H. Lee, and
`B. T. Huber, manuscript in preparation.
`
`progression and may not produce the same substrates as rest-
`ing cells or may not require the products of QPP for survival.
`Efforts are under way to identify the natural substrates of QPP
`as well as to elucidate the mechanisms of this cell death
`pathway.
`Proteases cleave substrates at little energy cost to the cell
`and may be important mediators of homeostasis in metaboli-
`cally inactive quiescent cells. We have recently observed that
`post-proline aminodipeptidase inhibitors cause apoptosis in
`quiescent cells and that QPP is a likely target of these inhibi-
`tors. A large number of signal molecules have a highly con-
`served Xaa-Pro motif on the amino terminus, whereas there
`are relatively few enzyme activities that have the ability to
`cleave peptide bonds containing proline (1). The isolation and
`cloning of QPP will help us understand the role of post-proline
`cleavage in the regulation of proteins with an amino-terminal
`Xaa-Pro motif.
`
`Acknowledgments—We thank the following people for providing us
`with valuable reagents: R. Snow for VbP, Lys-thiazolidide, and Lys-
`piperidide; J. T. Welch for L-125; and R. Burton for Jurkat cell pellets.
`We also thank Jaison Paliakkava for assistance in protein purification
`and Julie Anselmo, Lia Kim, and Suzanne Hurta for excellent technical
`assistance. Partial support for initial protein purification was provided
`by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Vanhoof, G., Goossens, F., De Meester, I., Hendriks, D., and Scharpe, S. (1995)
`FASEB J. 9, 736–744
`2. Morimoto, C., and Schlossman, S. F. (1998) Immunol. Rev. 161, 55–70
`3. von Bonin, A., Huhn, J., and Fleischer, B. (1998) Immunol. Rev. 161, 43–53
`4. Oravecz, T., Pall, M., Roderique

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket