throbber
Experimental and clinical
`endocrinology 8. diabetes : official
`journal. German Society of.
`DUP - General Colieclion
`-N1 EX464
`v. 108. no. 1
`
`|uu\.I inology
`
`Founded in 1928
`
`Official Journal
`
`society of
`Endocrinology
`
`‘
`
`g :% PROPERTY OF THE
`
`LIBRARY OF
`LIBRARYOF
`>4 MEDICINE
`Editors-In--L.nn.-.-n.
`
`K. Voigt, Marburg - H. Schatz, Bochum
`
`Editors of Volume:
`
`R. Renner, Miinchen
`
`C. J. Strasburger, Miiinchen
`
`Abstracts of Oral Presentations
`
`and Posters
`
`44th Symposion of the German
`Society of Endocrinology (DGE) and
`
`35. Jahrestagung der Deutschen
`Diabetes-Gesellschaft (DDG)
`
`Munich, May 31st—June 3rd, 2000
`
`EXPER I HENTHL RND CL I N I CHL ENDOCRINOLOGY
`HND D I HBETES ~ SUPPLEMENTS
`
`
`
`S I SHC
`
`ll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`
`irrent Awareness in Biological Sciences (CABS)
`
`37560751
`
`Thisnialtialrialit-Frans mpied
`atthe l"lL|'u1 and may be
`Subject US Copyright Laws
`
`1 oo
`
`AstraZeneca Exhibit 2160
`Mylan v. AstraZeneca
`IPR2015-01340
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`
`Experimental and Clinical
`
`Endocrinology
`& Diabetes
`
`Supplement 1, Vol. 108, 2000
`
`Editors-in-Chief:
`
`K. Voigt, Marburg - H. Schatz, Bochum
`
`Editors of Volume:
`
`R. Renner, Mijnchen
`C. J. Strasburger, Miinchen
`
`Abstracts of Oral Presentations
`
`and Posters
`
`44th Symposion of the
`German Society
`of Endocrinology (DGE) and
`
`35. Jahrestagung der
`Deutschen Diabetes-Gesellschaft (DDG)
`
`Munich, May 31st—June 3rd, 2000
`
`Homepage: http:llwww.eced.org
`
`Johann Ambrosius Barth
`Heidelberg
`
`Page 2 of3
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`
`pFr1t)5
`
`K. Glund', r. Hoffmartn', H.-U. Demuth', J. Banke-Bochitaz, K.L. Rostz, H.
`Fuderz,
`
`iProbiodrug Research GmbH, Halle/Saale and ZPAREXEL Institute of Clinical
`Phannacology, Berlin, Germany
`
`Single dose-escalation study to investigate the safety and tolerability ofthe
`DP IV inhibitor P32/98 in healthy volunteers
`
`The DP IV inhibitor Di-[3N-((2S,3S)-2—amino-3-methyl-pentanoyl) l,3-thiazoli-
`dine]
`fumarate (P32/98)
`improves glucose tolerance (GT) by an incretin-
`mediated enhanced insulin response in normal and diabetic rodents [1,2].
`A monocenter, randomized and double-blind phase I study in healthy volunteers
`Was designed to investigate the safety and tolerability of P32/98. Healthy male
`Volunteers (n=36, age 18-45, with normal oral glucose tolerance test results)
`received two single oral ascending doses of 7.5, 15, 30, 60, I20 and 240 mg of
`1332/98 or placebo (tablets containing 7.5 mg or 60 mg P32/98 or placebo).
`Drug administration (t=0) was followed by an oral glucose tolerance test (glucose
`solution of 75g at t=l0 min). Safety laboratory, vital signs, 12-lead ECG,
`telemetry and adverse events were recorded. No serious adverse events were
`observed. Eight adverse events (5): mild headache, Ix mild nausea, Ix common
`cold and Ix micro-haematuria) did not appear to be drug related as they either
`occurred within volunteers on placebo or were reported long time after the
`preceeding dose. No adverse event occurred at
`the highest 240-mg dose. No
`clinically significant changes
`in
`routine
`laboratory, vital
`signs or ECG
`assessments were observed.
`From these data it can be concluded, that single doses of P32/98 up to 240 mg
`were well tolerated. Plasma DP IV was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner. In
`parallel
`to the decreased DP IV-activity in the circulation a dose-dependent
`Increase in the half life of the active GLP-l7._~,(, was observed from plasma
`Samples
`
`I. Pederson, RA, White, HA, Schlenzig, D, Pauly, RP, Mclntosh, CHS, Demuth,
`H~U (1998) Diabetes 47(8): 1253-1258
`2. Pauly, RP, Demuth, H-U, Rosche, F, Schmidt, J, White, HA, Lynn, F,
`Mclntosh, CHS., Pederson, RA (1999) Metabolism 48(3): 385-389.
`
`pFr107
`ttir die HOE 901f3001-Study group,
`Standl E,
`Institut iiir Diabetestorschung , Miinchen
`randomislerten 28-
`Titel: Ergebnisse einer internationalen, multizentrischen,
`Wochen Studie zum Vergleich von Insulin Glargin (HOE 901) und NPH- insulin in
`der lntensivierten Therapie (ICT) von Typ 1 Diabetikern
`Ziel : Untersuchung der l/Viksamkeit und Vertraglichkeit von HOE 901. HOE 901 ist
`ein langwirksames Insulin-Analogon mit einem flachen Wirkprofil ohne dstinkte
`Aktivllatsspitzen. Methodik:
`in einer randomisierten Studie erhielten 585 Typ 1
`Diabetiker fiber 28 Wochen entweder HOE 901 oder NPH als Basalinsulin ( HOE 901
`292; NPH 293). 55% waren Manner, das miltlere Alter war 39 Jamie, die miltlere
`Diabetesdauer betrug 16 Jahre und der miltlere BMI 25 kg/m?. Vor der Slude wurde
`das Basalinsulin bei 49% der Patienten mindestens 2x am Tag injizien, Zu Beginn der
`Studio war der GHb 7.9 %, der NBZ 9.3 mmol/l (Mittelwerte). Beide Gruppen hatten
`vergleichbare Ausgangswerte. HOE 901 wurde
`1x/Tag
`(beim Zubettgehen)
`verabreicht, NPH 1x/Tag (beim Zubettgehen) oder 2x/Tag (morgens und beim
`Zubetigehen), je nach Vortherapie. Zu den Mahlzeiten wurde Normalinsulin gegeben.
`Die Abenddosis HOE 901 bzw. NPH sollte so gewahlt werden, dais der NBZ unter
`Venneidung von nachtlichen Hypoglykamien 5 120mg/dl
`(6.7mmol/l)
`lag. Beim
`Wechsel zu HOE 901 bei mit 1><NPH vorbehandelten Patienten blieb die Dosis des
`Basalinsulins nahezu unverandert; bei Patienten, die mehr als txNPH/Tag injiziert
`hatten, wurde verglichen mit der letzten NPH-Tagesdosis die HOE 901-Dosis um ca,
`20% reduziert und teilweise mit einer Erhohung des Nonnalinsulins kompensiert.
`Ergebnisse: Der GHb blieb in belden Behandlungsgruppen nahezu unverandert (HOE
`901 0.21%; NPH 0.10%), der NBZ nahm deutlich ab (HOE 901 -1.17 mmo|Il;NPH —
`0.89 mmol/l, adjusted means).
`lm Vergleich mit 2><NPH/Tag wurde der NBZ in der
`HOE 901 Gruppe signifikant mehr
`reduziert
`(HOE 901 -1.38 mmol/l; NPH -
`0.72 mmolll; p<0.05), ohne dais vermehrt nachtliche Hypoglykamien beiichtet wurden.
`lm Vergleich mit 1xNPH/Tag wurde der NBZ in beiden Gruppen gleicherrnaflen
`reduziert
`(-1.0mmolIl; adjusted means), wobei
`in der HOE 901 Gruppe weniger
`Patienten nachtliche Hypoglykamien (49% vs. 56%) oder schwere Hypoglykamien (9%
`vs. 16%) berichteten. Nach 28 Wochen hatten mehr HOE 901 (26%) als NPH
`Patienten (20%) einen NBZ _<_ 120mg/dl erreicht. Die Auswertung der Sicherheitsdaten
`ergab
`keinen
`relevanten Unlerschied
`zwischen
`den Behandlungsgruppen
`Schlulliolgerung: lm Vergleich mit NPH tretem unter HOE 901 im Rahmen der ICT
`weniger Hypoglykamien bei gleich guten Blutzuckerwenen auf bzw. es konnen bessere
`Blutzuckerwerte ohne vermehrtes Risiko erreicht werden.
`
`pFrl06
`Konrad T., Usadel K.-H.
`Medical Clinic l, Centre for Internal Medicine, Frankfurt am Main
`
`Effects of short-term treatment with the insulin sensitizer Pioglitazone
`(PIO) in a severely immobile type 2 diabetic on ICT
`
`Study obective: To investigate the short-term effects of 45 mg PIO in a
`metabolically well controlled, quadriplegic, insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic
`on ICT. Method: Case history. Results: Patient K.M., 46 y., quadriplegia
`since 1988 after a road accident with C3/4 damage, type 2 diabetes since
`1991, highly compliant with treatment and diet, treated with OAD since
`1994, BMI 24.8 kg/m2, consistently for years no endogenous C-peptide
`secretion detectable in fasting and postprandial tests. HbA1c consistently
`between 5.5% and 5.6% until 6/99 with 30 |.U. NPH and a mean of 20
`l.U. short-acting ins., then a slow increase to 6.6% by 11/99 when the
`insulin dose was increased.
`
`Daily blood sugar profiles show isolated hypoglycaemlc episodes which
`made it necessary to reduce the insulin dose. Conclusions: The increase
`in insulin dose, despite continued dietary compliance and no detectable
`endogenous insulin secretion,
`is occasioned by the patient's insulin
`resistance (IR). Owing to concomitant illness, there is no possibility of
`improving the IR by muscular exertion.
`PIO reduces the daily insulin
`dose by approx. 50% and improves blood sugar control after only four
`weeks‘ treatment.
`In well controlled patients, beneficial metabolic effects
`can be detected after only one week on an insulin sensitizer.
`Page 3 of 3
`
`pFrl08
`M. Walz, H. Kolb and S. Martin
`German Diabetes Research Institute at the Heinrich—Heine-University of
`Diisscldorf, Gemian Diabetes Centre, Dusseldorf, Germany
`
`Downregulation of the pancreatic IFN-Iy expression in NOD mice
`treated with an 11,4-lg fusionproteiu
`
`The nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse spontaneously dcvclops
`autoimmune diabetes which is associated with T cell infiltration of
`pancreatic islets leading to the destruction of insulin-producing 0 cells.
`More recently, the importance of a preferential activation of the Thl
`subset of T cells leading to a secretion of prointlamrnatory cytokincs was
`shown.
`We have constructed a fusion protein consisting of the mouse IL-4 and
`the Fc-domain of IgG2a. Bioactixity of the recombinant protein was
`initially shovm by its ability to stimulate IL-4-dependent cytotoxic T
`lytnphocytcs (CTL-44). IL-4-lg chimeric proteins were then tested in
`NOD mice which were treated with cyclophosphamide to synchronize
`the progression of insulitis. PBS, 20 ng rll.-4 or 50 ng IL-1-lg was
`administered (i.p.). At different time points, animals were sacrificed,
`pancrcata and spleen were removed for histopathology and RNA
`isolation.
`Quantitative PCR was performed from pancreatic RNA using the
`TaqMan (Perkin Elmer). RNA samples were nonnalized for B-actin and
`the expression of IFN-y, IL-12pl0 and IL-10 was analyzed. Expression
`of the Th1 cytokine IFN-y was reduced by 50% after treatment with IL-
`4. Only subtle differences were found for the expression levels of IL-
`I2p40 and IL-10. Histopathology revealed :1 different fonn of infiltration
`when compared to PBS-treated animals.
`Our results demonstrate that the IL-4-Ig fusion protein has a biological
`activity comparable to rI.L-4, as demonstrated in vitro and by
`downregulation of the 'I‘l11-specific cytokine expression The IL-Hg
`chimeric protein may be a powerful tool for the prevention of 13 cell
`destruction.
`
`Page 3 of 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket