throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIALAND APPEAL BOARD
`
`CERAMTEC GMBH
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`CERAMEDIC LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2015-00398
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,066,584
`
`TITLE: SINTERED AL20 3 MATERIAL, PROCESS FOR ITS PRODUCTION
`AND USE OF THE MATERIAL
`
`Issue Date: May 23, 2000
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. FRANZ UPPENA
`
`Mail Stop Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`41663377.1
`
`Exhibit 2313 Page 001
`
`CeraMedic Ex. 2313
`CeramTec GmbH v. CeraMedic LLC
`Case IPR2015-01328
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-00398
`U.S. Patent No. 6,066,584
`
`I, Dr. Franz Uppena, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am
`
`the Head of Patents and Trademarks for CeramTec GmbH
`
`("CeramTec"), the Petitioner in inter partes review Nos. 2015-00398 and
`
`2015-00424 (the "Petitions for IPR"). I am over 18 years of age and I make
`
`this declaration based on my own personal knowledge.
`
`2.
`
`CeramTec manufactures and sells ceramic components used in medical
`
`implants. CeramTec sells these ceramic components to medical device
`
`companies that incorporate the components into medical implants. These
`
`medical device companies include the following CeramTec customers:
`
`Biomet, Zimmer, DePuy 01thpaedics, and Smith & Nephew ("CeramTec
`
`Customers").
`
`3.
`
`CeraMedic sued the CeramTec Customers for infringement of the patent
`
`subject to the two Petitions for IPR (the "Customer Lawsuits"). CeraMedic
`
`accuses the Customers of infringing through the manufacture and sale of
`
`implants using CeramTec ceramic components. CeraMedic served the first
`
`ofthe Customer Lawsuits on July 1, 2014.
`
`4.
`
`CeraMedic also sued CeramTec for infringement of the samepatent subject
`
`to the two Petitions for IPR (the "CeramTec Lawsuit"). CeraMedic filed the
`
`complaint in the current CeramTec Lawsuit on October 17, 2014.
`
`41663377.1
`
`2
`
`Exhibit 2313 Page 002
`
`CeraMedic Ex. 2313
`CeramTec GmbH v. CeraMedic LLC
`Case IPR2015-01328
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-00398
`U.S. Patent No. 6,066,584
`
`5.
`
`CeramTec has agreed to indemnify and defend its Customers in the patent
`
`infringement dispute raised by CeraMedic in the Customer Lawsuits.
`
`In
`
`these agreements, CeramTec did not give any of its Customers the right to
`
`control the patent dispute with CeraMedic.
`
`6.
`
`CeramTec has used lawyers from Nmion Rose Fulbright (formerly known as
`
`Fulbright & Jaworski) as its US patent counsel for many years. CeramTec
`
`selected Norton Rose Fulbright as
`
`its counsel for the dispute with
`
`CeraMedic. Norton Rose Fulbright also represents the Customers in the
`
`Customer lawsuits. CeramTec pays alllegal fees and expenses related to the
`
`CeramTec Lawsuit, the Customer Lawsuits, and the Petitions for IPR. The
`
`Customers do not pay any of the legal fees or expenses related to the dispute
`
`with CeraMedic, including for the Petitions for the IPR or any subsequent
`
`proceedings.
`
`7.
`
`CeramTec has not been indemnified by its Customers or any third party in
`
`connection with the patent dispute raised by CeraMedic.
`
`8.
`
`CeramTec instructed Nm·ton Rose Fulbright to prepare and file the Petitions
`
`for IPR. The Customers were not involved in the decision to prepare and
`
`file the Petitions for IPR, but were informed of the decision and provided
`
`copies ofthe petitions only after each was filed. Only CeramTec and Nmion
`
`41663377. 1
`
`3
`
`Exhibit 2313 Page 003
`
`CeraMedic Ex. 2313
`CeramTec GmbH v. CeraMedic LLC
`Case IPR2015-01328
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-00398
`U.S. Patent No. 6,066,584
`
`Rose Fulbright selected the prior art and were involved in the substantive
`
`preparation of the Petitions for IPR.
`
`9.
`
`CeramTec has the exclusive right to direct and exerc1se control of its
`
`involvement in the IPR and was exclusively involved in the preparation,
`
`filing, and subsequent activity of the Petitions for IPR. Customers have not
`
`directed or exercised control over CeramTec's handling of the IPR, nor do
`
`the Customers have the right to direct or exercise control over the Petitions
`
`for IPR filed and prosecuted by CeramTec.
`
`1 0.
`
`I declare further that all Statements made herein are true and further that
`
`these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false Statements
`
`and the like so made are punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, under
`
`Section 1001, Title 18, United States Code, and that willful false statements
`
`may jeopardize the validity of any claim that is the subject of this
`
`reexamination.
`
`Executed on April <lf, 2015.
`
`Dr. Franz Uppena
`
`41663377.1
`
`4
`
`Exhibit 2313 Page 004
`
`CeraMedic Ex. 2313
`CeramTec GmbH v. CeraMedic LLC
`Case IPR2015-01328

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket