throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 29
`Entered: May 23, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01323
`Patent 6,314,409 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`Before KRISTEN L. DROESCH and MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`DROESCH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`A trial was instituted on December 8, 2015. Paper 12. Claim 40
`remains as the only challenged claim of this inter partes review following
`the termination in-part as to claims 21, 24–27, 29, 30, 32, 33, and 36–39.
`Paper 22. Petitioner requested oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70.
`Paper 26. Patent Owner did not file a request for oral hearing. See also Ex.
`3001, 6:3–4 (Counsel indicating that Patent Owner will not request oral
`
`

`
`CBM2014-00157
`Patent 6,314,409
`hearing). Petitioner’s request is GRANTED. Please note that the date of
`oral hearing has been changed from September 12, 2016, in the original
`Scheduling Order to July 12, 2016. Specifically, the hearing will
`commence at 1:00 PM ET, on July 12, 2016, on the ninth floor of Madison
`Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
`Petitioner will have thirty (30) minutes of total time to present
`arguments. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent
`Owner’s claims at issue in this review are unpatentable. Therefore,
`Petitioner will open the hearing by presenting its case regarding the
`remaining challenged claim for which the Board instituted trial.
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. The
`hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance, accommodated
`on a first-come-first-serve basis. The Board will provide a court reporter for
`the hearing, and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of
`the hearing.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served
`five (5) business days before the hearing. Petitioner also shall provide the
`demonstrative exhibits to the Board no later than two (2) business days
`before the hearing by emailing a copy of the demonstrative exhibits to
`Trials@uspto.gov. We waive the requirement under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b)
`that demonstrative exhibits be filed no later than the time of oral argument.
`Petitioner shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in this proceeding
`without prior authorization from the Board. Petitioner is directed to St. Jude
`Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University
`
`2
`
`

`
`CBM2014-00157
`Patent 6,314,409
`of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB January 27, 2014) (Paper 65), for
`guidance regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits.
`The Board expects the parties will meet and confer in good faith to
`resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits. If such objections cannot
`be resolved, the parties may file any objections to demonstratives with the
`Board at least two (2) business days before the hearing. The objections
`should identify with particularity which portions of the demonstrative
`exhibits are subject to objection, include a copy of the objected-to portions,
`and include a one-sentence statement of the reason for each objection. No
`argument or further explanation is permitted. The Board will consider any
`objections and schedule a conference call if deemed necessary. Otherwise,
`the Board will reserve ruling on the objections. Any objection to
`demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered
`waived.
`Petitioner is reminded that during oral hearing the presenter must
`identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or
`screen number) referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and
`accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
`The Board expects lead counsel for Petitioner to be present in person
`at the oral hearing. However, lead or backup counsel may present the
`party’s argument. If Petitioner anticipates that its lead counsel will not
`attend the oral argument, Petitioner should initiate a joint telephone
`conference with the Board no later than two (2) business days prior to the
`oral hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`3
`
`

`
`CBM2014-00157
`Patent 6,314,409
`Any special requests for audio visual equipment should be directed to
`Trials@uspto.gov no later than two (2) business days prior to the oral
`hearing.
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that oral hearing, conducted pursuant to the procedures
`outlined above, shall commence at 1:00 PM ET on July 12, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`CBM2014-00157
`Patent 6,314,409
`PETITIONER:
`Kenneth R. Adamo
`Brent P. Ray
`Joel R. Merkin
`Eugene Goryunov
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`kenneth.adamo@kirkland.com
`brent.ray@kirkland.com
`jmerkin@kirkland.com
`eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Lori A. Gordon
`Byron L. Pickard
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`lgordon-PTAB@skgf.com
`bpickard-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Tim R. Seeley
`James R. Hietala,
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES
`tim@intven.com
`jhietala@intven.com
`
`
`
`
`
`5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket