throbber
Dry Eye, Blepharitis and Chronic Eye
`Irritation: Divide and Conquer
`
`Jeffery P. Gilbard, MD
`
`Patients with chronic eye irritation
`
`are probably some of the most
`time-consuming and vexing for
`the doctor. The good news is that a
`good history by an ophthalmic assistant
`who knqws what to ask can frequently
`make th~ diagnosis before the doctor
`steps into the room. In addition, there
`are now treatments that really work.
`Most patients presenting to the
`office witl1 chronic eye irritation will
`ultimately turn out to have either dry
`eye or blepharitis. Dry eye is caused by
`any condition that decreases tear pro(cid:173)
`duction or increases tear evaporation
`sufficiently to result in a loss of water
`from tl1e tear film and an increase in
`tear film osmolarity. Tear production
`can be decreased by lacrimal gland dis(cid:173)
`ease, as seen in Sjogren's syndrome, or
`by any condition that decreases corneal
`
`sensation. Included among the more
`common causes for decreased corneal
`sensation are laser in situ keratomileu(cid:173)
`sis (LASIK) and photorefractive kerate(cid:173)
`ctomy (PRK) procedures that interrupt
`or ablate corneal nerves, and long-term
`hard contact lens wear.
`Tear evaporation can be increased in
`the presence of hu·ge palpebral fissure
`
`Before discussing the
`patient history, it is
`important to understand
`that blepharitis can be
`divided into two major
`types: anterior and
`posterior.
`
`From the Schepens Eye Research Institute,
`the Department of
`Boston, Massachusetts;
`Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School,
`Boston, Massachusetts; The Cornea & Vision
`Correction Center; Woburn, Massachusetts; and
`Advanced Vision Research,
`Inc., Woburn,
`Massachusetts. Portions of this article have been
`adapted from Gilbard JP: D1y Eye Disorders. In
`Albert DM, Jakobiec PA eels. Principles and
`Practice of Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: W.B.
`Saunders Company, 1994:257-276. Address cor(cid:173)
`respondence to Jeffrey P. Gilbard, MD, 7 Alfred
`Street, Suite 330, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801.
`Dr. Gilbard is Founder and CEO of Advanced
`Vision Research, Inc., (800) 979-8327.
`
`widths (i.e., over 10 mm) or from mei(cid:173)
`bomian gland dysfunction resulting
`from posterior blepharitis or meibomi(cid:173)
`tis (Figure 1 ). Increased tear film osmo(cid:173)
`larity, no matter what the cause, osmot(cid:173)
`ically dehydrates
`the eye surface,
`increases epithelial cell desquamation,
`decreases conjunctival goblet cell den(cid:173)
`sity, decreases corneal glycogen levels,
`and ultimately results in the loss of cell
`surface glycoproteins necessary for tear
`film stability. Conjunctival goblet cells
`
`are the mucous-producing cells on the
`eye surface that provide the natural
`lubrication for the eye; corneal glyco(cid:173)
`gen is the energy source for corneal
`healing.
`Before discussing the patient history
`it is important to understand that ble(cid:173)
`pharitis can be divided into two major
`types: anterior and posterior. Anterior
`blepharitis is less common and is char(cid:173)
`acterized by a dandruff-like process
`that occurs at the base of the lashes.
`This is different from the purulent
`drainage and crusting seen on the eye(cid:173)
`lashes in the still more uncommon type
`of anterior blepharitis caused by
`Staphlococcal aureus.
`Posterior blepharitis is the most fre(cid:173)
`quent type of blepharitis and involves
`an
`inflammatory process centered
`around the meibomian glands; this
`inflammatory process can spread
`throughout the lid margin and spill over
`to involve the ocular surface as well.
`Ultimately inflammation involving the
`meibomian gland leads to fibrosis,
`causing increasing disorganization and
`dysfunction of the meibomian glands.
`
`The Patient History
`A good history is one of the most
`powerful tools available to reach a
`diagnosis in a patient who complains
`of chronic eye irritation. There are
`seven questions
`that need
`to be
`answered to extract the most infonna(cid:173)
`tion from a patient.
`
`May/June 1999
`
`109
`
`APOTEX 1037, pg. 1
`
`

`

`plain of chronic sandy-gritty irritation (or
`buming) in their eyes, but in these pa(cid:173)
`tients the symptoms m·e worse upon
`awakening in the moming. This is be(cid:173)
`cause at night the inflamed eyelids are up
`against the cornea, tear secretion decreas(cid:173)
`es, and inflammatory mediators have all
`night to act on the surface of the eye.
`Since this is an inflammatory concli(cid:173)
`tion, patients also frequently complain
`of redness of their eyes in the morning.
`The symptoms m-e insidious in onset.
`Some patients may have discovered that
`hot compresses provide some relief.
`With time, meibomian gland inflam(cid:173)
`mation causes gland damage and meibo(cid:173)
`mian glm1d dysfunction develops. Tear
`film evaporation then increases, and
`these patients develop a second peak in
`their symptoms late in the day. Finally,
`after several years, the meibomian gland
`inflammation resolves as gland architec(cid:173)
`ture is destroyed and heals with fibrosis.
`These patients will then experience u
`resolution of their early morning symp(cid:173)
`toms but an intensification of their
`symptoms late in the clay.
`Occasionally patients with meibomi(cid:173)
`an gland dysfunction and orifice clo(cid:173)
`sure report that it feels as if their eyes
`ru·e tem-ing. It is important to note that
`these patients do not complain of tear
`overflow. How does closure of the mei(cid:173)
`bomian gland orifice and loss of the
`tear film lipid layer cause these symp(cid:173)
`toms? The lipid layer, in addition to
`decreasing tear film evaporation, also
`decreases the surface tension of the tear
`film, thereby holding the tear film tight
`to the globe. With loss of this lipid layer
`the tears splash around more, and the
`aqueous layer fi·om the tear iilm can
`begin to touch the mucocutaneous junc(cid:173)
`tion of the lid margin, especially with
`concomitant loss of lipid fi·om the lid
`margin as well. When this occurs it
`feels to the patient as if their eye is tear(cid:173)
`ing. (If tear ovetflow occurs, the exam(cid:173)
`iner will need to consider the diagnosis
`of nasolacrimal drainage dysfunction.)
`
`1. Character. What does the irrita(cid:173)
`tion feel like? Is it a sandy-gritty feel(cid:173)
`ing, burning, foreign body sensation, or
`increased "awareness" of the eyes? Do
`the eyes itch?
`2. Location. Where is the irritation
`located? Is it on the smface of the eye,
`in the eye, on the lid margin, or on the
`skin?
`3. Diurnal variation. Are the symp(cid:173)
`toms worse at any particular time of
`day? Patients typically have difficulty
`with this question. It helps to ask
`patients what symptoms are like upon
`awakening, at the breakfast table, at
`lunch and after dinner in the evening.
`Are they worse on awakening or late in
`the day? Are there two symptoms
`peaks-on awakening in the morning
`and then late in the day?
`4. Onset. Did the symptoms start
`suddenly, or did they develop gradual(cid:173)
`ly? Do symptoms occur in clearly
`delineated episodes or is this a continu(cid:173)
`ous problem?
`5. Duration. How long have the
`symptoms been present?
`6. Aggravating factors. Is there any(cid:173)
`thing that makes the symptoms worse(cid:173)
`wind, smoke, low humidity (i.e., air(cid:173)
`plane cabins), reading, watching TV,
`contact lens wear, artificial tears?
`7. Alleviating factors. Is there any(cid:173)
`thing that makes the symptoms better-
`
`hot compresses, eye closure, high
`humidity, artificial tears?
`Once this information is collected
`the examiner will have a constellation
`of symptoms that will match those
`associated with one or more of the con(cid:173)
`ditions detailed below.
`
`Dry Eye
`Patients with dry eye most com(cid:173)
`monly complain of a sandy-gritty feel(cid:173)
`ing in their eyes that becomes worse as
`the day progresses. This is because at
`night the closed eyelids form a water(cid:173)
`tight barrier completely blocking
`evaporation, and the eye surface has a
`chance to recover. With eye opening,
`evaporation begins, and as the day pro(cid:173)
`gresses evaporation pulls further and
`further ahead of tear production. For
`this reason, the symptoms increase as
`the day proceeds.
`The symptoms are insidious in onset,
`and initially patients may only complain
`of an increased awm·eness of their eyes.
`Late in the disease symptoms may be
`present throughout the day, but usually
`the diurnal variation persists. As the
`cornea becomes involved, patients
`develop sensitivity to light.
`
`Meibomltis and Meibomian
`Gland Dysfunction
`Patients with meibomitis also com-
`
`110
`
`May/June 1999
`
`APOTEX 1037, pg. 2
`
`

`

`Anterior Blepharitis
`These patients have symptoms at
`the anterior lid margin. Specifically,
`patients complain of crusting or irrita(cid:173)
`tion at the base of the lashes. The adja(cid:173)
`cent lid skin may be involved. Later in
`the disease there can be loss of lashes.
`There is no diurnal variation, and the
`onset is usually insidious.
`
`Large Palpebral Fissure Width
`The symptoms in these patients are
`nearly identical with those of patients
`with
`lacrimal
`gland
`disease.
`Sandy-gritty feelings and burning
`become worse as the day progresses.
`Because lacrimal gland function is
`normal- in these cases, patients can
`notice excess tearing.
`
`Decreased Corneal Sensation
`A history of fifth nerve trauma or
`surgery may be present. Recently,
`refractive corneal surgery has become
`a common cause of decreased corneal
`sensation. It is important to recognize,
`however, that there are many other
`causes for decreased corneal sensation,
`any one of which may play a role in the
`dry eye disease of a specific patient.
`Remember that any condition that
`decreases corneal sensation decreases
`tear secretion and may increase tear
`film osmolarity.
`One of the less frequently recog(cid:173)
`nized syndromes is the dry eye condi(cid:173)
`tion, associated with elevated tear film
`osmolarity, that may develop after
`long-term contact lens wear, particular(cid:173)
`ly long-term hard contact lens wear. 1•2
`Contact lens wear decreases corneal
`sensation, and the effect is more pro(cid:173)
`nounced with hard contact lenses and
`extended wear soft contact lenses.3.4
`The effect is cumulative, and it is not
`uncommon to see patients who have
`worn hard lenses for longer than 15
`years develop lens intolerance requir(cid:173)
`ing discontinuation of lens wear. Many
`of these patients complain of dryness
`
`and sandy-gritty feelings in their eyes
`that become worse as the day goes on
`even in the 'absence of contact lens
`wear. For this reason it is important to
`ask about contact lens wear in patients
`who complain of eye hritation.
`Once the contact lens history is posi(cid:173)
`tive, and if contact lens wear continues,
`it is important to determine whether
`
`Ocular irritation due at
`least in part to eye drop
`use should be suspected
`in all patients using
`traditional artificial tears
`more than 4 times a day.
`Both preserved and
`nonpreserved solutions
`can be responsible.
`
`there are any features of the contact lens
`cleaning and sterilization system (i.e.,
`.preservatives) or contact lens fit that
`may be contributing to ocular irritation.
`
`Medlcameneosa
`Ocular irritation due at least in part
`to eye drop use should be suspected in
`all patients using traditional artificial
`tears more than four times a day. These
`patients generally give a history of reg(cid:173)
`ular and frequently escalating eye drop
`use. Both preserved and nonpreserved
`solutions can be responsible, although
`there is now one commercially avail(cid:173)
`able preservative-free solution that
`appears to be free of this side effect.
`In these cases, complaints of sting(cid:173)
`ing with eye drop use should raise sus(cid:173)
`picions. Patients with medicamentosa
`characteristically
`are unable
`to
`describe a diurnal pattern to their
`symptoms-symptoms are equivalent
`
`throughout the day. This is because the
`damage is promoted by continued
`overuse of topical medications, even
`though use of these medications may
`temporarily mask symptoms by
`increasing the lubrication of the ocular
`surface.
`
`Lacrimal Drainage Obstruction
`The most likely basis for symptoms
`of tearing and tear overflow is lacrimal
`drainage obstruction. Some patients
`may complain of irritation of the skin
`at the lateral canthus rather than frank
`tearing. The skin here can become
`"chapped" from repeated exposure to
`tear fluid. Symptoms from lacrimal
`drainage obstruction are insidious in
`onset, and are usually exacerbated by
`exposure to wind and environmental
`initants.
`
`Allergic Conjunctivitis
`Patients with allergic conjunctivitis
`complain of ocular itching. They may
`also complain of increased mucus pro(cid:173)
`duction by the eye. The onset is com(cid:173)
`monly seasonal and may be associated
`with exacerbation of hay fever, asthma,
`or eczema.
`
`Nocturnal Lagophthalmos
`These patients commonly complain
`of burning in the eyes that is worse on
`awakening. There is frequency a histo(cid:173)
`ry of previous lid surgery or thyroid
`eye disease.
`
`Superior Limbic
`.
`Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
`Patients with superior limbic kerato(cid:173)
`conjunctivitis (SLK) complain of burn(cid:173)
`ing and irritation and develop symp(cid:173)
`toms and remissions somewhat abrupt(cid:173)
`ly. A diurnal pattern to the symptoms is
`not usually evident. The factors initiat(cid:173)
`ing the development of exacerbations
`and remissions are not known.
`Episodes may last from months to
`years, and remissions may last for
`
`May/June 1999
`
`111
`
`APOTEX 1037, pg. 3
`
`

`

`MEIBOMIAN GLAND ORIFICES
`
`PATENT
`STENOSED
`CLOSED
`Figure 2. Chronic meibornitis lead to the development of meibomiarr gland dysfrmction. As the mei·
`bomiai1 gland dysfunction progresses, the meibornian gland orifice goes from patent, to stenosed,
`to closed.
`
`weeks or may be permanent. Vision is
`not affected. Females are affected more
`frequently than males, and it is com(cid:173)
`mon to see a history of thyroid dys(cid:173)
`function.
`
`Superficial Punctate
`Keratitis (Thygeson's)
`Thygeson's superficial punctate ker(cid:173)
`atitis is characterized by the insidious
`onset of photophobia, in·itation, and
`decreased vision. The course of the dis(cid:173)
`ease is episodic in nature and lasts
`about 2 to 3 'years. The cornea will
`show elevated punctate staining with
`fluorescein.
`
`Dry Eyelid Skin
`Some patients will say their "eyes"
`feel dry, but when questioned carefully
`reveal that they are referring to their
`eyelid skin. This common ambiguity
`underlines the need to determine the
`location of the symptoms. Frequently
`these patients will report the daily use
`of soap on the skin around their eyes.
`
`Tarsal Foreign Body
`Patients with a chronic foreign body
`sensation may have a tarsal foreign
`body. Symptoms are frequently monoc(cid:173)
`ular. In addition to exogenous material,
`a meibomian gland-derived conjuncti(cid:173)
`val concretion (or concretions) can
`
`the basis for symptoms that
`form
`remain enigmatic for years.
`
`Mucus Fishing Syndrome
`Some patients with ocular irritation
`develop the practice of reaching into
`their conjunctival cul-de-sac with their
`fingers and "fishing" out the mucus
`strand that they find there. These
`patients complain of eye irritation and
`increased mucus production by the eye.
`Conjunctival trauma induces an addi(cid:173)
`tional increase in mucus production and
`a vicious circle follows. Traumatized
`areas stain with rose Bengal,and the
`condition resolves once patient behav(cid:173)
`ior is altered.9
`
`Blepharospasm
`ble-
`primary
`Patients with
`pharospasm may complain of a "tired
`feeling" in the eyes that is actually their
`interpretation or description of their dif(cid:173)
`ficulty keeping their eyes open. On
`careful questioning it becomes apparent
`. that there is actually no eye irritation,
`but rather an involuntary closure of the
`eyes or an inability to keep their eyes
`open. Driving, reading and exposure to
`sunlight may exacerbate these symp(cid:173)
`toms. Since dry eye symptoms are com(cid:173)
`monly exacerbated by the same factors,
`it is very important to keep this fre(cid:173)
`quently missed diagnosis in mind.
`
`112
`
`,.,
`
`In patients with secondary ble(cid:173)
`pharospasm there is underlying chron(cid:173)
`ic eye irritation. Failure of the patient
`to respond to dry eye treatment may
`highlight the presence of this second
`condition.
`
`Nonspecific Ocular Irritation
`Not all ocular irritation is due to eye
`disease. The eye may be normal, and
`there may be environmental irritants,
`such as smoke and chemicals, responsi(cid:173)
`ble for symptoms.
`
`Nol'mal Eyes with Hypochondriasis
`This is a relatively uncommon prob(cid:173)
`lem. Usually ocular irritation is due to
`one or more of the entities previously
`mentioned. Nevertheless, it is important
`to recognize patients without organic
`disease, and sometimes a careful histo(cid:173)
`ry, which in turn fails to mesh with the
`examination, can provide the first clue.
`
`The Examination
`The two most common causes for
`chronic eye irr-itation are dry eye and
`meibomitis. The dry eye diagnosis can
`usually be made from the history, and
`the examination permits a determina(cid:173)
`tion of the cause or causes of dry eye
`in the patient. Signs of meibomitis can
`be very subtle and it helps to know
`exactly what the earliest signs are. The
`key elements in the examination of
`these two groups of patients are
`detailed below.
`Palpebral fissure width. Tear film
`evaporation is directly proportional to
`the distance between the upper lid and
`the lower lid. With the patient looking
`directly at the examiner's open eye,
`measure the distance between the upper
`lid and the lower lid.
`Once palpebral fissure width mea(cid:173)
`sures 10 mm or more, it becomes a sig(cid:173)
`nificant factor in increasing the evapo(cid:173)
`rative stress on the tear film.
`Meibomian gland orifice. As meibo(cid:173)
`mian gland function declines the mei-
`
`May/June 1999
`
`APOTEX 1037, pg. 4
`
`

`

`bomian gland orifice goes from patent
`to stenosed to closed (Figure 2). Patent
`orifices are visible on the lid margin.
`Stenosed orifices are not visible but
`when gentle pressure is applied to the
`lid, droplets of oil appear on the lid
`margin. Closed orificies also are not
`visible but here, when gentle pressure
`is applied to the lid, no oil appears on
`the margin.
`Lid margin. The normal lid margin
`· is free of visible blood vessels. The
`earliest change seen with meibomitis is
`the appearance of telangiectatic blood
`vessels on the lid margin.
`Tear volume and quality. The best
`way to examine the tear film is with
`fluorescein-not the drop from a bottle
`but with a wetted fluorescein strip. The
`problem with the drop from a bottle is
`that it replaces the tear film so the
`examiner is examining the drop rather
`than the tear film. Instead, take a fluo(cid:173)
`rescein strip, wet it with a drop of ster(cid:173)
`ile saline or irrigating solution, shake
`off the excess, pull the lower lid down,
`and paint the strip along the inferior
`tarsal conjunctiva.
`In cases where tear volume is
`decreased the fluorescein will not fluo(cid:173)
`ress under the cobalt blue light of the
`slit lamp, but instead remain dark. As
`tear volume decreases further, the tear
`film will assume a more viscous
`appearance-as the upper lid rises fol(cid:173)
`lowing a blink, the tear film, rather
`than snapping up quickly with it, will
`rise more slowly. Ultimately, patients
`with decreased volume develop debris
`in the tear film as well.
`In patients with meibomian gland
`dysfunction the tear film assumes a
`watery appem·ance due to a loss of the
`lipid layer. It will be apparent in these
`cases that the tear film is not lying tight
`to the globe.
`Ocular surface staining. In the
`presence of dry eye alone, whether the
`dye used is fluorescein, lissamine
`green or rose Bengal, the conjunctiva
`
`always stains more than the cornea.
`With posterior blepharitis alone, if
`there is any staining, the cornea always
`stains at least as much as the conjunc(cid:173)
`tiva. In both em·ly dry eye and mild
`blephm·itis, there may be no ocular
`surface staining at all.
`Corneal sensation. In patients with
`a history of contact lens wem·, corneal
`surgery, Trigeminal nerve damage, her(cid:173)
`pes simples or zoster, or diabetes, and
`with dry eye symptoms as well, it
`makes sense to test corneal sensation.
`This can be done easily with a cotton
`wisp. Wit11 experience the range of nor(cid:173)
`mal is easily appreciated.
`The history is the most sensitive
`indicator of dry eye, and these ele(cid:173)
`ments just detailed will enable the
`
`The two most common
`causes for chronic eye
`irritation are dry eye
`and meibomitis.
`The dry eye diagnosis
`can usually be made
`from the history.
`
`examiner to determine the cause of the
`dry eye symptoms. In the case of other
`causes for eye irritation, the history
`together with the careful examination
`of these elements, will narrow the dif(cid:173)
`ferential diagnosis and enable a defini(cid:173)
`tive diagnosis.
`
`Dry Eye Treatment
`It has been commonly taught that
`dry eye treatment begins with lubricat(cid:173)
`ing eye drops, also known as m"tificial
`tears. Attempting to treat dry eye
`patients with lubricant solutions is fre(cid:173)
`quently a
`frustrating experience.
`Dissatisfaction with the results of treat-
`
`ment has been attributed to the effect of
`preservatives or the short retention
`time of these drops in the eye. The tox(cid:173)
`icity of preservatives has been well
`documented.
`Until recently, the efficacy of tradi(cid:173)
`tional mtificial tem· solutions has been
`limited by an additional important
`mechanism. In order to understand this
`additional mechanism, it is necessm·y
`to review what is known about oph(cid:173)
`thalmic solutions and the electrolyte
`requirements of the surface of the eye.
`In 1960, Merrill and coworkers
`reported that 0.9% (isotonic) sodium
`chloride solution was toxic to conjunc(cid:173)
`tival epithelium in
`tissue culture.
`Solutions that had a more complete
`ionic composition did not show the
`same toxicity. 13 Nine yem·s later, in
`1969, Sussman and Friedman showed
`that frequent instillation of 0.9% sodi(cid:173)
`mn chloride solution in normal rabbit
`eyes led to eye redness and photopho(cid:173)
`bia and eventually to corneal epithelial
`breakdown. 8
`This work was lm·gely ignored until
`1985, when Bachman and Wilson stud(cid:173)
`ied desquamation from rabbit corneas.
`They found that corneal desquamation,
`or peeling, was increased with expo(cid:173)
`sure to 0.9% sodium chloride solution
`in compmison to a solution also con(cid:173)
`taining potassium, bicarbonate, calci(cid:173)
`um, magnesium, and phosphate. 14
`These data were later corroborated
`with morphologic studies. 15 In 1986,
`Fullard and Wilson demonstrated
`increased desquamation with a saline
`solution in vivo in human corneas
`using clinically relevant 30-second
`exposure times. 16
`
`Electrolyte Balance Crucial
`What emerges from this work is that
`the cornea and conjunctiva have elec(cid:173)
`trolyte requirements that are not met by
`solutions containing only sodium and
`chloride. Ultimately it was shown that
`the electrolyte requirements of the sur-
`
`May/June 1999
`
`113
`
`APOTEX 1037, pg. 5
`
`

`

`......... ~
`
`vated, continuing to osmotically pull
`water out of the surface of the eye even
`though the surface is wet.
`In order for an artificial tear solu(cid:173)
`tion to effectively lower elevated tear
`osmolarity, it needs an osmolarity of
`about 170 mOsm/L. 19 An eye drop
`with such osmolarity takes tear film
`osmolarity from about 330 mOsm/L in
`a dry eye to about 285 mOsm/L, and in
`doing so, flips the osmotic gradient
`between the tear film and eye surface
`so that water can move in to rehydrate
`the dehydrated tissues. A treatment
`called TheraTears (Advanced Vision
`Research, Woburn, MA) is this hypo(cid:173)
`tonic and has been shown, with QID
`dosing, to produce sustained lowering
`of elevated tear film osmolarity with
`continued treatment.20
`In addition, TheraTears precisely
`matches the electrolyte balance of the
`human tear film. 5•17•18 By lowering. ele(cid:173)
`vated tear film osmolarity and provid(cid:173)
`ing this electrolyte balance, TheraTears
`has been shown in pre-clinical studies
`to restore both conjunctival goblet cells
`and corneal glycogen levels in dry eye
`disease (Figure 3). More recently,
`TheraTears has been shown to cure
`symptoms and restore conjunctival
`goblet cells in dry eye patients follow(cid:173)
`ing LASIK.21
`A l)'eatment Program
`At the time of the initial visit,
`patients with dry eye can be started on
`TheraTears, 4 to 6 drops in each eye
`within a 5-minute period four times a
`day. The principle behind this closing
`interval is to facilitate rehydration of the
`tear film-ocular surface system in the
`dry eye patient.
`Patients with meibomian gland dys(cid:173)
`function are also instmcted to use hot
`compresses and lid massage to encour(cid:173)
`age e~pression of lipid into the tear film.
`The hot compress should be sho(cid:173)
`wer-temperat11l'e warm and applied to
`each eyelid for only about 5 seconds.
`
`Figure 3. Normal goblet cell dmsity (upper left) is decreased in dry eye (upper right). Treatment
`with TheraTears has been shown to restore conjunctival goblet cells (lower left), while treatment
`with traditional artificial tear solutions do not (lower right).
`
`face of the eye coincide with the unique
`electrolyte balance of the normal tear
`film. Specifically, the maintenance of
`normal conjunctival goblet cell density
`and corneal glycogen levels is depen(cid:173)
`dent upon the unique electrolyte bal(cid:173)
`ance of the tear film.
`Of key importance are the levels of
`sodium, chloride, potassium, and bicar(cid:173)
`bonate and, to a lesser extent, the pres(cid:173)
`ence of trace amounts of calcium, mag(cid:173)
`nesium, and phosphate.5•17•18 Without
`the proper electrolyte content and bal(cid:173)
`ance, a lubricating eye drop has the
`potential to cause both epithelial toxic(cid:173)
`ity and aggravation of goblet cell loss, a
`clinical syndrome known as medica(cid:173)
`mentosa.5·7 The electrolyte balance of a
`tear solution is crucial. Also crucial is
`the osmolarity of the tear solution.
`Since elevated tear film osmolarity
`causes the surface changes in dry eye
`
`disease, an artificial tear solution needs
`to lower elevated tear film osmolarity.
`
`The patient history is a
`powerful tool in
`narrowing the differential
`diagnosis of chronic eye
`irritation or even
`establishing the diagnosis.
`The examination adds
`power to the history.
`
`When an isotonic or even a weakly
`hypotonic eye drop is placed in a dry
`eye, tear film osmolarity remains ele-
`
`114
`
`May/June 1999
`
`APOTEX 1037, pg. 6
`
`

`

`Special attention should be paid to the
`lower lids.
`At the time of diagnosis, patients
`with meibomitis are started on doxycy(cid:173)
`cline 50 mg a day (or minocycline 100
`mg a day) along with the same hot
`compresses and lid massage regimen
`instituted for the meibomian gland dys(cid:173)
`function patients. The heat temporarily
`increases blood flow to the eyelid, and
`blood contains factors, such as a-2
`macroglobulin,
`that
`function
`to
`decrease inflammation.
`Patients are seen back in 4 weeks.
`Patients with dry eye are then divided
`into two groups: 1) improved and
`happy, and 2) improved but still unhap(cid:173)
`py. Those who are happy are continued
`on TheraTears, while silicone punctal
`plugs are inserted into the lower punc(cid:173)
`ta of patients who need a boost in
`effect. TheraTears are continued in all
`of these patients because of its unique
`ability to restore conjunctival goblet
`cells in dry eye disease.
`In patients with meibomitis the sys(cid:173)
`temic doxycycline is continued for 3
`months. At that time the patient's early
`morning symptoms are reevaluated. If
`they have resolved the dose is reduced
`in half. The dose is tapered this way
`every 3 months until the lowest, neces(cid:173)
`sary dose is determined or the doxycy(cid:173)
`cline can be stopped.
`
`Summary
`Dry eye and posterior blepharitis are
`the two most common causes for
`chronic eye irritation. Dry eye is caused
`by loss of water from the tear film
`resulting from either decreased tear
`production or increased tear film evap(cid:173)
`oration. The resultant increase in tear
`film osmolarity causes the changes on
`the eye surface responsible for the
`symptoms of dry eye. Posterior ble(cid:173)
`pharitis causes eye irritation from
`inflammation, and leads to the develop(cid:173)
`ment of meibomian gland dysfunction.
`The patient history is a powerful
`
`tool in narrowing the differential diag(cid:173)
`nosis of chronic eye initation or even
`establishing the diagnosis. The exam
`adds power to the history, and sorts out
`the mechanisms causing dry eye
`symptoms.
`The primary goal of dry eye treat(cid:173)
`ment is to lower elevated tear film
`osmolarity. This can be achieved with
`TheraTears treatment, either with or
`without punctal plugs. The primary
`goal of meibomitis treatment is to
`reduce inflammation. This can be
`achieved by hot compresses and lid
`massage and, when necessary, systemic
`treatment with low dose doxycycline.
`By determining the cause or causes
`of chronic eye irritation, effective treat(cid:173)
`ments can be employed.
`
`RIWERENCES
`
`I. Farris RL, Stuchell RN, Mandel ID. Basal
`and reflex human tear analysis. I. Physical mea(cid:173)
`surements. Osmolarity, basal volumes, and reflex
`flow rate. Ophthalmology. 1981 ;88:852-857.
`2. Farris RL. Tear analysis in contact lens
`Trans Am Ophthalmol
`Soc.
`wearers.
`1985;88:501-545.
`3. Millodot M. Corneal sensitivity. Int
`Ophthalmol Clin. 1981;21:47-54.
`4. Millodot M. Clinical evaluation of an
`extended wear lens. Int Contact Lens Clin.
`1984;1:16-23.
`5. Gilbard JP, Rossi SR, Gray Heyda K.
`Ophthalmic solutions, the ocular surface, and a
`unique therapeutic artificial tear formulation. Am
`J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:348-355.
`6. Wilson FM II. Adverse external ocular
`effects of topical ophthalmic therapy: An epi(cid:173)
`demiologic, laboratory, and clinical study. Trans
`Am Ophthabnol Soc. 1983;81:854-965.
`7. Schwab IR, Abbott RL. Toxic ulcerative
`unrecognized
`problem.
`kcratopathy. An
`Ophthalmology. 96:1187-1193, 1989.
`8. Sussman JD, Friedman M: Irritation of
`rabbit eye caused by contact-lens wetting solu(cid:173)
`tion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68:703-706.
`9. McCulley JP, Moore MB, Matoba AY.
`fishing syndrome. Ophthalmology.
`Mucus
`1985 ;92: 1262-1265.
`10. Pfister RR, Burnstein N. The effects of
`ophthalmic drugs, vehicles, and preservatives on
`corneal epithelium: A scanning electron micro(cid:173)
`scope sludy./nves/ Ophthalmol. 1976;15:246-259.
`11. Burstein NL. Corneal cytotoxicity of top-
`
`I N T S.
`K , E. Y , P 0
`.an~ postl!riol".l;!lep~arlils ·
`con'm1on. cayses.'"f!>.r c;hro~lc ·
`
`ically applied drug, vehicles, and preservatives.
`Surv Ophthalmol. 1980;25:15-30.
`12. Burnstein NL. Preservative cytotoxic
`threshold for benzalkonium chloride and
`chlorhexidine digluconate in cat and rabbit
`Invest Ophthalmol
`Vis
`Sci.
`corneas.
`1980;19:308-313.
`13. Merrill DL, Fleming TC, Girard LJ. The
`effects of physiologic balanced salt solutions and
`normal saline on intraocular and extraocular tis(cid:173)
`sues. Am J Ophthalmol. 1960;49:895-898.
`14. Bachman WG, Wilson G. Essential ions
`for maintenance of the corneal epithelial surface.
`Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26:1484-1488.
`15.Bergmanson JP, Wilson GS. Ultra(cid:173)
`structural effects of sodium chloride on the
`corneal epithelium. Invest Ophtha/mol Vis Sci.
`1989;30: 116-121.
`16. Fullard RJ, Wilson OS. Investigation of
`sloughed corneal epithelial cells collected by
`non-invasive irrigation of the corneal surface.
`Curr Eye Res. 1986;5:847-856.
`I 7. Gil bard JP. Human tear film electrolyte
`concentrations in health and dry-eye disease. Int
`Ophthalmol Clin. 1994;34:27-36.
`18. Gilbard JP. Non-toxic ophthalmic prepa(cid:173)
`rations. US Patent 4,775,531. Oct. 4, 1988.
`19. Gilbard JP, Kenyon KR. Tear diluents in
`treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca.
`the
`Ophthalmology. 1985;92:646-650.
`SR. An
`20. Gilbard
`JP, Rossi
`electrolyte-based solution that increases corneal
`glycogen and conjunctival goblet-cell density in
`a rabbit model for keratoconjunctivitis sicca.
`Ophthalmology. 1992;99:600-604.
`21. Lenton LM, Albietz J. Effect of carmel(cid:173)
`lose-based artificial tears on the ocular surface in
`eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Refract.
`Surg. 1999;15(suppl):S227-S231.
`
`May/June 1999
`
`115
`
`APOTEX 1037, pg. 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket