throbber
Apoptosis of Ocular Surface Cells in Experimentally
`Induced Dry Eye
`
`Steven Yeh,1 Xiu Jun Song,1,2 William Farley,1 De-Quan Li,1 Michael E. Stern,3 and
`Stephen C. Pflugfelder1
`
`PURPOSE. To evaluate to effect of experimental dry eye on
`ocular surface apoptosis.
`METHODS. Aqueous tear production and clearance were inhib-
`ited by systemic administration of scopolamine and exposure
`to an air draft for 12 days in 4- to 6-week-old 129SvEv/CD-1
`mixed white mice. Eyes and ocular adnexa were excised,
`cryosectioned, and evaluated for apoptosis by terminal deoxy-
`nucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-digoxigenin nick end
`labeling (TUNEL) assay,
`immunohistochemical assay for
`caspase-3 and poly(ADP-ribose) phosphate (PARP), and exam-
`ination of nuclear morphologic changes by Hoechst DNA nu-
`clear staining and transmission electron microscopy.
`RESULTS. The number of TUNEL-positive cells in the mice with
`induced dry eye was significantly increased compared with
`control mice in the following ocular regions: central corneal
`(P ⬍ 0.0014), peripheral corneal (P ⬍ 0.0001), bulbar con-
`junctival (P ⬍ 0.0021), and tarsal conjunctival (P ⬍ 0.0046)
`epithelia; tarsal conjunctival stroma (P ⬍ 0.0274); and lid margin
`(P ⬍ 0.0219, n ⫽ 4 in all cases). There were no significant
`differences observed between treated and control groups in
`the central corneal, peripheral corneal, or bulbar conjunctival
`stroma; meibomian glands; skin; retina-choroid; or episcleral
`regions. Immunohistochemistry for caspase-3 and poly(ADP-
`ribose) polymerase p85 fragment revealed increased immuno-
`reactivity in regions of increased TUNEL positivity, particularly
`in the corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells. Ultrastructural
`morphologic changes consistent with apoptosis were observed
`in the conjunctival epithelial cells.
`CONCLUSIONS. Experimentally induced dry eye in mice causes
`apoptosis of cells in ocular surface tissues including the central
`and peripheral corneal epithelium, bulbar and tarsal conjunc-
`tival epithelia, tarsal conjunctival stroma, and lid margin. Apo-
`ptosis may play a key role in the pathogenesis of keratocon-
`junctivitis sicca and may be a therapeutic target for this
`condition. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:124 –129) DOI:
`10.1167/iovs.02-0581
`
`From the 1Ocular Surface Center, Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor
`College of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Houston, Texas;
`3Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California; and the 2Third Hospital of Hebei
`Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
`Supported in part by Allergan, Inc, an unrestricted grant from
`Research to Prevent Blindness, The Oshman Foundation, and The
`William Stamps Farish Fund.
`Submitted for publication June 13, 2002; accepted July 30, 2002.
`Disclosure: S. Yeh, None; X.J. Song, None; W. Farley, None;
`D.-Q. Li, None; M.E. Stern, Allergan, Inc. (E); S.C. Pflugfelder,
`Allergan, Inc. (C, F)
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
`charge payment. This article must therefore be marked “advertise-
`ment” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`Corresponding author: Stephen C. Pflugfelder, Baylor College of
`Medicine, 6565 Fannin, NC-205 Ocular Surface Center, Houston, TX
`77030; stevenp@bcm.tmc.edu.
`
`124
`
`D ysfunction of the integrated ocular surface–lacrimal
`
`gland functional unit causes the ocular surface disease
`keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS).1 The ocular surface in this
`condition is poorly lubricated because of decreased produc-
`tion of mucins by the stratified epithelia and conjunctival
`goblet cells and has altered barrier function manifesting
`clinically as increased permeability to fluorescein dye.2 In-
`stability of the precorneal tear film and punctate epitheli-
`opathy cause blurred and fluctuating vision. The cause of
`these pathologic changes is currently unknown; however,
`there is mounting evidence that inflammation may play an
`important role.
`Evidence for immune-based inflammation in dry eye in-
`cludes increased density of inflammatory cells and elevated
`inflammatory cytokines3–5 and proapoptotic fac-
`levels of
`tors6 –9 in the ocular surface and tear film. The relationship
`between ocular surface inflammation and apoptosis has also
`been the subject of much investigation. Expression of proapop-
`totic markers (Fas, Fas ligand, APO2.7, CD40, and CD40 ligand)
`by the conjunctival epithelium in KCS has been found to be
`significantly higher than in normal eyes and is positively cor-
`related with expression of HLA-DR class II antigen, an immune
`activation marker.6,7 After 6 months of therapy with cyclo-
`sporin A , the levels of cell membrane markers for apoptosis
`(i.e., Fas) and inflammation, such as HLA-DR, were significantly
`reduced.8
`In studies of chronic idiopathic canine KCS, increased ap-
`optosis was observed in epithelial cells and decreased apopto-
`sis in lymphocytes in the conjunctiva and lacrimal glands.9
`Immunohistochemistry studies demonstrated that p53, Fas,
`and Fas ligand were elevated in lacrimal acinar cells and con-
`junctival epithelial cells in dogs with dry eye.9 In contrast, low
`levels of expression of Bcl-2, an antiapoptosis marker, was
`observed in these tissues. After treatment with topical cyclo-
`sporin A, induction of apoptosis in lymphocytes and suppres-
`sion of apoptosis in conjunctival epithelial cells was observed
`in these animals.9 In lacrimal acinar cells, a decrease in p53 and
`an increase in Bcl-2 was also observed after treatment with
`cyclosporin A.9
`Although apoptosis has been demonstrated in chronic dry
`eye in humans and dogs, no studies have been undertaken to
`evaluate the occurrence and kinetics of apoptosis on the ocular
`surface after acute induction of dry eye. We investigated
`whether apoptosis develops on the ocular surface after exper-
`imental induction of dry eye in a mouse model of KCS, using
`three different techniques: the TUNEL assay, which detects
`DNA fragmentation; immunodetection of two cellular markers
`of apoptosis: activated caspase-3 (a downstream effector pro-
`tease) and cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP; a nu-
`clear DNA-binding protein); and examination of cell nuclei for
`morphologic changes characteristic of apoptosis by nuclear
`staining with a DNA-binding dye, and transmission electron
`microscopy.
`
`Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, January 2003, Vol. 44, No. 1
`Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
`
`APOTEX 1035, pg. 1
`
`

`

`IOVS, January 2003, Vol. 44, No. 1
`
`Apoptosis in Dry Eye
`
`125
`
`TABLE 1. Quantitation of TUNEL-Positive Ocular Surface Cells
`
`Ocular Surface Tissue
`
`Dry Eye Mice (n ⴝ 4)
`
`Untreated Mice (n ⴝ 4)
`
`P
`
`Central corneal epithelium
`Central corneal stroma
`Peripheral corneal epithelium
`Peripheral corneal stroma
`Bulbar conjunctive epithelium
`Bulbar conjunctive stroma
`Tarsal conjunctive epithelium
`Tarsal conjunctive stroma
`Lid margin
`Meibomian glands
`Skin
`Retinal choroid
`Episclera
`
`32.5 ⫾ 9.7
`3.75 ⫾ 4.5
`28.0 ⫾ 6.2
`3.25 ⫾ 3.4
`31.3 ⫾ 11
`5.0 ⫾ 1.8
`55.8 ⫾ 25
`4.25 ⫾ 2.2
`27.5 ⫾ 15
`29.3 ⫾ 25
`24.8 ⫾ 22
`1.25 ⫾ 1.3
`0.50 ⫾ 1.0
`
`Values are mean ⫾ SD. Probabilities by t-test.
`* Indicates statistical significance (P ⬍ 0.05).
`
`3.75 ⫾ 3.4
`1.0 ⫾ 0.82
`0.25 ⫾ 0.50
`0.25 ⫾ 0.50
`2.75 ⫾ 2.5
`2.25 ⫾ 1.7
`0.5 ⫾ 1.0
`0.75 ⫾ 0.96
`4.0 ⫾ 2.2
`0.75 ⫾ 1.5
`3.75 ⫾ 2.5
`0.5 ⫾ 1.0
`0.5 ⫾ 1.0
`
`⬍0.0014*
`⬍0.3893
`⬍0.0001*
`⬍0.1317
`⬍0.0021*
`⬍0.0701
`⬍0.0046*
`⬍0.0274*
`⬍0.029*
`⬍0.0615
`⬍0.1017
`⬍0.3867
`⬍1.000
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Animal Treatment and Tissue Collection
`All animal research protocols were approved by the Baylor College of
`Medicine Center for Comparative Medicine and conformed to the
`standards in the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic
`and Vision Research.
`Aqueous tear production and clearance were inhibited by subcu-
`taneous injection of scopolamine (1 mg in 0.2 mL) three times daily in
`the flanks of 4- to 6-week-old 129SvEv/CD-1 white mice. Dry eye was
`induced in mice with a modification of a previously described tech-
`nique.10 Mice were exposed to a continuous air draft from a fan placed
`6 in. in front of the cage in an environmentally controlled room (50%
`humidity, 18°C) for 10 hours a day for 12 consecutive days. These
`treatments cause a statistically significant decrease in aqueous tear
`production and tear clearance that results in increased corneal epithe-
`lial permeability to fluorescein dye, conjunctival squamous metaplasia,
`and loss of goblet cells.10
`Mice were killed and their eyes and adnexa were excised, embed-
`ded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (VWR, Swannee,
`GA), flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and sectioned with a cryostat (HM
`500; Micron, Waldorf, Germany) into 5-␮m sagittal slices that were
`placed on microscope slides (Superfrost/Plus; Fisher, Houston, TX).
`These were stored at ⫺80°C until they were used in the studies of
`apoptosis.
`
`Apoptosis Evaluation
`A combination of immunohistochemical and morphologic studies
`were used to study apoptosis in our mouse model. Specifically, assays
`for DNA fragmentation (TUNEL), caspase 3 activation, and PARP cleav-
`age were performed for immunohistochemical characterization of ap-
`optosis; transmission electron microscopy and Hoechst dye nuclear
`staining were used for morphologic characterization of nuclear
`changes observed in apoptosis.
`The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-nick end
`labeling (TUNEL) assay, which detects 3⬘ hydroxyl ends in fragmented
`DNA as an early event in the apoptotic cascade,11 was performed with
`a kit (ApopTag; Intergen Co., Purchase, NY), using a modification of
`the manufacturer’s protocol as previously described.11,12 Cryosections
`of whole mouse eyes were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, and cell
`membranes were permeabilized with 2:1 ethanol:acetic acid solution.
`The samples were incubated with TdT enzyme and 11-digoxigenin
`dUTP at 37°C for 90 minutes. After quenching the reaction, samples
`were blocked with blocking solution and incubated with anti-digoxi-
`genin FITC-conjugated antibody for 60 minutes at room temperature.
`One cryosection was incubated with 1 ␮g/mL DNase I in TdT buffer
`
`for 30 minutes at room temperature before incubation with TdT
`enzyme and 11-digoxigenin dUTP as a positive reaction control.
`After completion of the initial TUNEL procedure, the cryosections
`were evaluated for expression of activated caspase-3. After three
`washes in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), tissue samples
`were incubated with 5 ␮g/mL polyclonal rabbit anti-active caspase-3
`primary antibody (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) or PBS as a primary
`antibody negative control at 4°C overnight. Samples were then
`blocked with 10% goat serum for 30 minutes at room temperature and
`incubated with goat anti-rabbit conjugated antibody (Alexa Fluor 594;
`Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 45 minutes at room temperature,
`followed by three washes in PBS. Nuclei were then counterstained
`using 0.5 ␮g/mL Hoechst 33342 dye (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in approx-
`imately 30 ␮L mounting gel (Gel Mount; Fisher) and a 22 ⫻ 50-mm
`coverslip (Fisher) then applied.
`Apoptotic cells in different regions of the ocular surface were
`assessed by epifluorescence microscope (Eclipse E400; Nikon, Garden
`City, NY) . Photographs at 400⫻ magnification were taken of repre-
`sentative areas of the cornea, bulbar conjunctiva, and tarsal conjunc-
`tiva. All TUNEL-positive cells were counted in the conjunctiva in
`100-␮m length ⫻ 100-␮m width areas in the sagittal sections and in the
`cornea in 100-␮m length ⫻ 20-␮m width areas in the sagittal sections.
`A Student’s t-test was used to analyze statistical significance of the data
`collected.
`Immunodetection of the PARP p85 fragment was performed by
`immunofluorescent staining of cryosections that were fixed in 100%
`methanol at 4°C for 10 minutes. After three washes in PBS, samples
`were blocked with 10% goat serum for 30 minutes at room tempera-
`ture and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature with a 1:50
`dilution of rabbit anti-mouse PARP p85 fragment antibody (Promega,
`Madison, WI) or PBS, as a primary antibody negative control. After
`three washes in PBS, samples were incubated with goat anti-rabbit
`conjugated antibody (Alexa Fluor 488; Molecular Probes) for 45 min-
`utes at room temperature, followed by three washes in PBS and nuclei
`counterstaining with 0.5 ␮g/mL Hoechst 33342 dye (Sigma).
`For transmission electron microscopy, the cornea and conjunctiva
`were excised from treated and control mice. The tissues were diced
`carefully into 1-mm cubes, to avoid crushing, and fixed in 3% glutar-
`aldehyde buffered to pH 7.2 with 0.01 M piperazine-N,N⬘-bis(2-ethane
`sulfonic acid [PIPES]) for 1 hour. They were rinsed in buffer and
`postfixed in PIPES-buffered osmium tetroxide (pH 7.2) for 1 hour at
`room temperature, rinsed in several changes of distilled water, and
`dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol. The dehydrated tissues
`were incubated in two 45-minute changes of propylene oxide followed
`by a 1:1 mixture of propylene oxide and Spurr resin for 1.5 hours. The
`tissue pieces were then incubated in pure resin for 1.5 hours, after
`
`APOTEX 1035, pg. 2
`
`

`

`126 Yeh et al.
`
`IOVS, January 2003, Vol. 44, No. 1
`
`FIGURE 1. TUNEL-caspase-3 dual-la-
`bel assay. In the conjunctiva (A) or
`cornea (B). (A) Conjunctiva. Top left:
`TUNEL-positive cells in bulbar con-
`junctival epithelium in treated mouse.
`Top center: Hoechst 33342 nuclear
`stain in treated mouse. Top right: ac-
`tive caspase-3 staining in treated
`mouse. Bottom left: TUNEL staining
`of bulbar and tarsal conjunctiva in
`untreated control mouse. Bottom
`center: Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain-
`ing of bulbar and tarsal conjunctiva
`in untreated control mouse. Bottom
`right: active caspase-3 staining of bul-
`bar and tarsal conjunctiva in un-
`treated control mouse. (B) Central
`cornea. Top left: TUNEL-positive cells
`in central corneal epithelium in
`treated mouse. Top center: Hoechst
`33342 nuclear stain in treated mouse.
`Top right: active caspase-3 staining
`of corneal epithelium in treated
`mouse. Bottom left: TUNEL-positive
`cells in superficial corneal epithe-
`lium of untreated control mouse.
`Bottom center: Hoechst 33342 nuclear
`stain in untreated control mouse.
`Bottom right: active caspase-3 stain-
`ing in untreated control mouse.
`
`which they were transferred to fresh resin in block molds and allowed
`to cure at 60°C overnight. Sections cut 1 ␮m thick from the hardened
`blocks were mounted on glass slides, stained with an alcoholic solution
`of toluidine blue and basic fuchsin and examined by light microscope.
`Areas of interest were trimmed, and 60-nm sections were cut and
`mounted on copper grids (300 mesh). The grids were stained with
`uranyl acetate and lead citrate and photographed with an electron
`microscope (model 100C Temscan; JEOL, Peabody, MA; and 4489 film;
`Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY).
`
`RESULTS
`
`As previously reported, mice treated with systemic scopol-
`amine injections and subjected to an air draft and desiccating
`environment showed a significant decrease in aqueous tear
`production and clearance by day 4 that was sustained through-
`out the treatment period.10 Dryness was accompanied by de-
`velopment of KCS, with loss of conjunctival goblet cells and
`increased corneal epithelial permeability to carboxyfluores-
`cein.10 Apoptosis in the cornea and conjunctiva was assessed
`in mice treated in this fashion for 12 days and in untreated
`control animals.
`
`FIGURE 2. TUNEL assay positive control sections. Top left: Hoechst
`33342 nuclear stain of lid margin (L), tarsal conjunctiva (T), bulbar
`conjunctiva (B), and cornea (K). Top right: TUNEL-positive cells in lid
`margin,
`tarsal and bulbar conjunctiva, and cornea. Bottom left:
`Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain of retina and choroid. Bottom right:
`TUNEL-positive cells of retina and choroid.
`
`APOTEX 1035, pg. 3
`
`

`

`IOVS, January 2003, Vol. 44, No. 1
`
`Apoptosis in Dry Eye
`
`127
`
`tral and peripheral corneal and bulbar and tarsal conjunctival
`epithelia; tarsal conjunctival stroma; and lid margin (Table 1,
`Fig. 1). There were no significant differences between dry eye
`and control groups in the central corneal, peripheral corneal,
`or bulbar conjunctival stroma; meibomian glands; skin; retina-
`choroid; or episcleral regions (Table 1).
`Positive control experiments revealed TUNEL-positive cells
`throughout all regions of the eye including the cornea, bulbar
`and tarsal conjunctiva, retina, and choroid (Fig. 2).
`Immunofluorescent staining for active caspase 3 revealed
`increased immunoreactivity in regions of TUNEL positivity.
`
`FIGURE 3. PARP staining of ocular surface tissues in the tarsal con-
`junctiva (A) and cornea (B). (A) Tarsal conjunctiva. Top left: numerous
`PARP-positive cells were detected in the superficial tarsal conjunctival
`epithelium of treated mouse. Inset: higher magnification of boxed area
`(left) highlights PARP-positive cells in conjunctival epithelium. Top
`right: Hoechst 33342 nuclear counterstain of tarsal conjunctival re-
`gion. Bottom left: representative tarsal conjunctival section from un-
`treated control mouse. Inset: higher magnification of boxed area (left)
`highlights absence of PARP-positive cells in conjunctiva of untreated
`control mouse Bottom right: Hoechst 33342 nuclear counterstain of
`tarsal conjunctiva in untreated control mouse. (B) Cornea. Top left:
`PARP-positive cells in superficial corneal epithelium of treated mouse.
`Inset: higher magnification of boxed area (left) highlights PARP-posi-
`tive cells within the corneal epithelium. Top right: Hoechst 33342
`nuclear counterstain of treated mouse cornea. Bottom left: PARP stain-
`ing in cornea of untreated control mouse. Inset: higher magnification
`of boxed area (left) highlights absence of PARP-positive cells in cornea
`of untreated control mouse. Bottom right: Hoechst 33342 nuclear
`counterstain in cornea of untreated control mouse.
`
`TUNEL and Caspase-3 Immunostaining
`Normal, untreated control mice exhibited minimal apoptosis
`assessed by TUNEL staining in the cornea and conjunctiva
`(Table 1, Fig. 1). The number of TUNEL-positive cells was
`significantly increased in mice with induced dry eye compared
`with control mice in the following ocular surface tissues: cen-
`
`FIGURE 4. Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain of conjunctiva (A) and cornea
`(B). (A) Tarsal conjunctiva. Top left: the superficial tarsal conjunctival
`epithelium in the treated mouse showed dysmorphic architecture and
`small, fragmented appearance of nuclei. Bottom left: higher magnifi-
`cation of boxed area (top left) shows multiple fragmented cells in tarsal
`conjunctival epithelium of treated mouse (arrows). Top right: tarsal
`conjunctival architecture of untreated control mouse. Bottom right:
`higher magnification of boxed area (top right) shows no nuclear or cell
`fragments in the untreated mouse. (B) Cornea. Top left: the corneal
`epithelium in the treated mouse appeared thinned and atrophic with
`dysmorphic architecture. Bottom left: higher magnification of boxed
`area (top left) shows clumped chromatin in multiple basal epithelial
`cells (arrows). This finding was also seen to some degree in the
`superficial corneal epithelium. Top right: thicker, regular architecture
`in cornea of untreated control mouse. Bottom right: higher magnifi-
`cation of boxed area (top right) shows peripheral clumping of nuclear
`material, which was not seen to the same degree in the untreated
`control cornea as in the treated cornea.
`
`APOTEX 1035, pg. 4
`
`

`

`128 Yeh et al.
`
`IOVS, January 2003, Vol. 44, No. 1
`
`FIGURE 5. Transmission electron mi-
`croscopy (TEM) of conjunctival epi-
`thelium of treated mouse. (A) Lower
`magnification TEM of bulbar con-
`junctiva epithelium. Multiple epithe-
`lial cells (arrows) exhibited chroma-
`tin condensation and peripheral
`aggregation of compacted chroma-
`tin. (B) Higher magnification TEM of
`bulbar conjunctiva epithelial cell
`showing chromatin condensation and
`peripheral aggregation of nuclear ma-
`terial, suggesting apoptotic cell death.
`
`Specifically, active caspase 3 activity was localized to the cen-
`tral corneal epithelium, peripheral corneal epithelium, super-
`ficial conjunctival epithelium, and lid margins of the mouse
`with induced dry eye. This staining was not observed in the
`negative control for which secondary antibody alone was used
`(data not shown).
`
`Anti-PARP p85 Fragment Immunostaining
`
`PARP p85 fragment staining revealed positive cells in the cen-
`tral and peripheral corneal and the bulbar and tarsal conjunc-
`tival epithelia and stroma in the treated mice. The punctate and
`diffuse pattern of PARP staining was similar to that observed in
`apoptotic liver epithelial cells.13 The cells showing the stron-
`gest staining for PARP in the tarsal conjunctival and central
`corneal epithelia of treated mice (Fig. 3). In contrast, only
`nonspecific staining of the conjunctival epithelial basement
`membrane and weak diffuse cytoplasmic staining was noted in
`untreated control mice (Fig. 3). No staining was observed in
`the secondary antibody alone control (data not shown).
`
`Hoechst 33342 Nuclear Staining
`Nuclear staining of the cornea and conjunctiva with Hoechst
`33342 revealed dysmorphic nuclear architecture and frag-
`mented nuclear material in the treated mice compared with
`control animals (Fig. 4).
`
`Transmission Electron Microscopy
`Ultrastructural nuclear changes consistent with apoptosis were
`observed in the cornea and conjunctiva of treated mice. Nu-
`clear chromatin condensation and peripheral migration of
`chromatin, as shown in a representative section in Figure 5,
`were noted in many conjunctival epithelial cells. These nuclear
`changes were rarely observed in the conjunctival stromal cells.
`Fewer apoptotic cells were noted in the corneal epithelium
`than in the conjunctiva. Although some nuclear condensation
`and peripheral margination of chromatin were observed in
`occasional corneal epithelial cells, nuclear fragmentation to the
`extent of that in the conjunctival epithelium was not observed.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Although apoptosis of ocular surface cells has been detected in
`chronic dry eye in dogs and humans, our experiments indicate
`that apoptosis is an acutely inducible event that accompanies
`the development of KCS in our experimental mouse model of
`dry eye. Apoptosis on the ocular surface was demonstrated by
`several markers and by characteristic nuclear morphologic
`changes. The TUNEL assay revealed DNA fragmentation sug-
`gestive of apoptosis in multiple ocular surface tissues, includ-
`ing the central and peripheral corneal epithelium, bulbar and
`tarsal conjunctival epithelia, tarsal conjunctival stroma, and lid
`margin in mice with induced dry eye. Immunohistochemistry
`for caspase 3 and PARP and ultrastructural studies using trans-
`mission electron microscopy suggest that the most marked
`apoptosis occurred in the superficial bulbar conjunctival epi-
`thelium. Although TUNEL staining was observed in the periph-
`eral and central corneal epithelium, less ultrastructural evi-
`dence of apoptosis was observed at these sites than in the
`conjunctival epithelial tissues. It is possible that the TUNEL
`assay may detect cells entering the apoptotic pathway before
`dissolving into irreversible nuclear fragmentation or it may
`detect other nonspecific DNA changes induced by ocular sur-
`face dryness.
`Apoptosis occurs through two pathways, an extrinsic path-
`way involving the interaction of death ligands (e.g., TNF-␣, Fas
`ligand) with their respective cell surface receptors and an
`intrinsic pathway that is initiated by insults that damage the
`DNA, such as ultraviolet light and chemotherapeutic agents.
`Both pathways eventually result in mitochondrial damage with
`release of cytochrome c and downstream activation of caspases,
`such as caspase 3. Activation of other downstream caspases
`results in cleavage of cellular proteins, such as PARP, cytoker-
`atin 18, and other caspases, that lead to the morphologic and
`biochemical changes of apoptosis (Fig. 6).14,15
`Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is a nuclear DNA-bind-
`ing protein that functions in DNA base excision repair.16 PARP
`cleavage results in a decreased enzymatic repair function and
`contributes to the progression of apoptosis, although PARP
`
`APOTEX 1035, pg. 5
`
`

`

`IOVS, January 2003, Vol. 44, No. 1
`
`Apoptosis in Dry Eye
`
`129
`
`References
`
`1. Stern ME, Beuerman RW, Fox RI, Gao J, Mircheff AK, Pflugfelder
`SC. The pathology of dry eye: the interaction between the ocular
`surface and lacrimal glands. Cornea. 1998;17:584 –589.
`2. Pflugfelder SC, Tseng SCG, Sanabria O, et al. Evaluation of subjec-
`tive assessments and objective diagnostic tests for diagnosing tear-film
`disorders known to cause ocular irritation. Cornea. 1998;17:38–56.
`3. Jones DT, Monroy D, Zi J, Pflugfelder SC. Alterations of ocular
`surface gene expression in Sjo¨gren’s syndrome. Adv Exp Med Biol.
`1998;438:533–536.
`4. Pflugfelder SC, Jones D, Ji Z, Afonso A, Monroy D. Altered cytokine
`balance in the tear fluid and conjunctiva of patients with Sjo¨gren’s
`syndrome keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Curr Eye Res. 1999;19:201–211.
`5. Barton K, Monroy DC, Nava A, Pflugfelder SC. Inflammatory cyto-
`kines in tears of patients with ocular rosacea. Ophthalmology.
`1997;104:1868 –1874.
`6. Brignole F, De Saint-Jean M, Goldschild M, Becquet F, Goguel A,
`Baudouin C. Expression of fas-fas ligand antigens and apoptotic
`marker APO2.7 by the human conjunctival epithelium: positive
`correlation with class II HLA-DR expression in inflammatory ocular
`surface disorders. Exp Eye Res. 1998;67:687– 697.
`7. Brignole F, Pisella PJ, Goldschild M, De Saint Jean M, Goguel A,
`Baudouin C. Flow cytometric analysis of inflammatory markers in
`conjunctival epithelial cells of patients with dry eyes. Invest Oph-
`thalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1356 –1363.
`8. Brignole F, Pisella PJ, De Saint Jean M, Goldschild M, Goguel A,
`Baudouin C. Flow cytometric analysis of inflammatory markers in
`KCS: 6-month treatment with topical cyclosporin A. Invest Oph-
`thalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:90 –95.
`9. Gao J, Schwalb TA, Addeo JV, Ghosn CR, Stern ME. The role of
`apoptosis in the pathogenesis of canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca: the
`effect of topical cyclosporin A therapy. Cornea. 1998;17:654–663.
`10. Dursun D, Wang M, Monroy D, et al. A mouse model of kerato-
`conjunctivitis sicca. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:632– 638.
`11. Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson SA.
`Identification of pro-
`grammed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA
`fragmentation. J Cell Biol. 1992;119:493–501.
`12. Schmitz GG, Walter T, Seibl R, Kessler C. Nonradioactive labeling
`of oligonucleotides in vitro with hapten digoxigenin by tailing
`with terminal transferase. Anal Biochem. 1991;192:222–231.
`13. Zhang H, Cook J, Nickel J, et al. Reduction of liver Fas expression
`by an antisense oligonucleotide protects mice from fulminant
`hepatitis. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:862– 867.
`14. Barrett KL, Willingham JM, Garvin JA, Willingham MC. Advances in
`cytochemical methods for detection of apoptosis. J Histochem
`Cytochem. 2001;49:821– 832.
`15. Nunez G, Benedict MA, Hu Y, Inohara N. Caspases: the proteases
`of the apoptotic pathway. Oncogene. 1998;17:3237–3245.
`16. Trucco C, Oliver FJ, de Murcia G, Menissier-de Murcia J. DNA
`repair defect in poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-deficient cell lines.
`Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:2644 –2649.
`17. Smulson ME, Pang D, Jung M, et al. Irreversible binding of poly-
`(ADP) ribose polymerase cleavage product to DNA ends revealed
`by atomic force microscopy: possible role in apoptosis. Cancer
`Res. 1998;58:3495–3498.
`18. Smyth PG, Berman SA, Bursztajn S. Markers of apoptosis: methods
`for elucidating the mechanism of apoptotic cell death from the
`nervous system. Biotechniques. 2002;32:648 – 665.
`19. Solomon A, Dursun D, Liu Z, Xie Y, Macri A, Pflugfelder SC. Pro-
`and anti-inflammatory forms of interleukin-1 in the tear fluid and
`conjunctiva of patients with dry-eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol
`Vis Sci. 2001;42:2283–2292.
`20. Pflugfelder SC, Jones D, Ji Z, Afonso A, Monroy D. Altered cytokine
`balance in the tear fluid and conjunctiva of patients with Sjo¨gren’s
`syndrome keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Curr Eye Res. 1999;19:201–222.
`21. Zamzami N, Marchetti P, Castedo M, et al. Inhibitors of permeabil-
`ity transition interfere with the disruption of the mitochondrial
`transmembrane potential during apoptosis. FEBS Lett. 1996;384:
`53–57.
`22. Kowaltowski AJ, Castilho RF, Vercesi AE. Mitochondrial perme-
`ability transition and oxidative stress. FEBS Lett. 2001;495:12–15.
`
`FIGURE 6. Mechanisms and markers of apoptosis. Summary of current
`knowledge of the mediators of apoptosis.14,15
`
`cleavage is not absolutely necessary for apoptosis to proceed.17
`Caspase 3, a downstream effector caspase, is responsible for
`cleavage of several critical nuclear targets in the apoptotic
`cascade. These include the inhibitor of caspase-activated de-
`oxynuclease (ICAD), which results in nuclear fragmentation,
`and PARP, which results in a defective DNA repair function.18
`Detection of the activated caspase 3 and PARP p85 fragment in
`the bulbar and tarsal conjunctival epithelium and in the central
`and peripheral corneal epithelium of the treated mice in our
`study suggests that these apoptotic mediators may be involved
`in the pathogenesis of dry eye.
`Although the precise pathway by which apoptosis occurs in
`dry eye has not yet been elucidated, we believe that this
`phenomenon may play a crucial role in its pathogenesis and in
`the clinical manifestations of KCS. The proinflammatory ocular
`surface milieu that develops in dry eye could certainly activate
`extrinsic pathways of apoptosis. For example, increased ex-
`pression of the proapoptotic cytokines, TNF-␣ and IL-1, have
`been detected in the conjunctival epithelium and tear fluid of
`patients with KCS.19,20
`Whether the occurrence of apoptosis is a physiologic re-
`sponse to an ocular surface insult or a critical element in the
`pathogenesis of the ocular surface disease in dry eye may be
`delineated by further natural history studies correlating apo-
`ptosis with clinical progression of dry eye. However, the death
`of cells responsible for ocular surface health and protection,
`such as the conjunctival goblet cells, could contribute to pro-
`gression of KCS. Furthermore, the punctate epithelial erosions
`that are observed in the cornea and conjunctiva of patients
`with KCS could be attributed to sloughing of apoptotic epithe-
`lial cells.
`Our studies suggest that apoptosis may play a key role in the
`pathogenesis of KCS. Characterization of apoptotic pathways
`may provide therapeutic targets for the treatment of KCS. As
`previously reported, one of the therapeutic mechanisms of
`cyclosporin A in dry eye could be inhibition of mitochondrial
`pathways of apoptosis.9 Cyclosporin A has been reported to
`prevent the mitochondrial permeability transition that pro-
`ceeds apoptotic cell death.21,22
`
`APOTEX 1035, pg. 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket