throbber
Plasma
`
`Physics
`and
`Engineering
`
`second edition
`
`Alexander Fridman
`
`Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA
`
`Lawrence A. Kennedy
`
`University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
`
`@ CRC Press
`
`Ta
`Boca
`
`& Francis Group
`on London NewYork
`
`ress is an imprint of the
`a or & Francis Group, an informa business
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 1 - |PR2015-01279
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 1 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`CRC Press
`Taylor & Francis Group
`6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
`Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
`© 2011 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
`CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business
`
`No claim to original U.S. Government works
`
`Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper
`10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
`
`International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4398-1229-7 (Ebook-PDF)
`
`This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been
`made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the
`validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the
`copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to
`publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let
`us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
`
`Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted,
`or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, includ-
`ing photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written
`permission from the publishers.
`
`For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com
`(http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers,
`MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety
`of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment
`has been arranged.
`Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
`identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
`Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
`http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
`and the CRC Press Web site at
`http://www.crcpress.com
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 2 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`Electrostatics, Electrodynamics, and Fluid Mechanics of Plasma
`
`409
`
`(cid:8).
`
`(6.6.42)
`
`1
`− ωBωBi
`
`ω2
`

`
`be derived taking into account the ion motion
`(cid:7)
`
`k2c2
`ω2
`
`= 1 − ω2
`
`p
`ω2
`
`1 ± ωB
`#
`If the electromagnetic wave frequency exceeds ion-cyclotron frequency
`(ω (cid:5) ωB), influence of the term ωBωBi
`ω2 in the denominator is negligible
`#
`and the dispersion equation 6.6.42 coincides with Equation 6.6.39. Conversely,
`if the wave frequency is low (ω (cid:10) ωB), then the term ωBωBi
`ω2 becomes dom-
`inant in the dispersion equation. In this case, the dispersion equation 6.6.42
`can be rewritten as
`
`#
`c2
`k)2
`(ω
`
`= 1 + ω2
`p
`ωBωBi
`
`= 1 + μ0ρ
`B2
`
`≈ c2
`v2
`A
`
`.
`
`(6.6.43)
`
`This introduces again the Alfven wave velocity vA (Equation 6.5.17); here,
`ρ = ne M is the mass density in completely ionized plasma (see Ginsburg,1960;
`Ginsburg and Rukhadze, 1970).
`
`6.7 Emission and Absorption of Radiation in Plasma,
`Continuous Spectrum
`6.7.1 Classification of Radiation Transitions
`Radiation occurs due to transitions between different energy levels of a quan-
`tum system: transition up corresponds to absorption of a quantum Ef − Ei =
`ω, transition down the spectrum corresponds to emission Ei − Ef = ω (see
`Section 6.7.2). From the point of classical electrodynamics, radiation is related
`to the nonlinear change of dipole momentum, actually with the second deriva-
`tive of dipole momentum. Neither emission nor absorption of radiation is
`possible for free electrons. Electron collisions are necessary in this case. It will
`be shown in Section 6.7.4 that electron interaction with a heavy particle, ion, or
`neutral is able to provide emission or absorption, but electron–electron inter-
`action cannot. It is convenient to classify different types of radiation according
`to the different types of electron transition from one state to another. Electron
`energy levels in the field of an ion as well as transitions between the energy
`levels are illustrated in Figure 6.32. The case when both initial and final elec-
`tron states are in continuum is called the free–free transition. A free electron
`in this transition loses part of its kinetic energy in the Coulomb field of a pos-
`itive ion or in interaction with neutrals. The emitted energy in this case is a
`continuum, usually infrared and called bremsstrahlung (direct translation—
`stopping radiation). The reverse process is the bremsstrahlung absorption.
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 3 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`410
`
`Plasma Physics and Engineering
`
`Free–free
`
`Bound–free
`
`Bound–bound
`
`FIGURE 6.32
`Energy levels and electron transitions induced by ion field.
`
`Electron transition between a free state in continuum and a bound state in
`atom (see Figure 6.32) is usually referred to as the free–bound transition. The
`free–bound transitions correspond to processes of the radiative electron–ion
`recombination (see Section 2.3.5) and the reverse one of photoionization (see
`Section 2.2.6). Such kinds of transitions also could take place in electron-
`neutral collisions. In this case, these are related to photo-attachment and
`photo-detachment processes of formation and destruction of negative ions
`(see Section 2.4). The free-bound transitions correspond to continuum radia-
`tion. Finally, the bound–bound transitions mean transition between discrete
`atomic levels (see Figure 6.32) and result in emission and absorption of spec-
`tral lines. Molecular spectra are obviously much more complex than that of
`single atoms because of possible transitions between different vibrational and
`rotational levels.
`
`6.7.2 Spontaneous and Stimulated Emission: Einstein Coefficients
`Consider transitions between two states (upper “u” and ground “0”) of an
`atom or molecule with emission and absorption of a photon ω, which is
`illustrated in Figure 6.33. The probability of a photon absorption by an atom
`per unit time (and, hence, atom transition “0” → “u”) can be expressed as
`P(“0”, nω → “u”, nω − 1) = Anω.
`(6.7.1)
`Here, nω is the number of photons; A is the Einstein coefficient, which
`depends on atomic parameters and does not depend on electromagnetic wave
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 4 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`Electrostatics, Electrodynamics, and Fluid Mechanics of Plasma
`
`411
`
`hω
`
`Absorption
`
`Upper level
`
`Emission L
`
`ower level
`
`FIGURE 6.33
`Radiative transition between two energy levels.
`
`characteristics. Similarly, the probability of atomic transition with a photon
`emission is
`
`P(“u”, nω → “0”, nω + 1) = 1
`

`
`+ Bnω.
`
`(6.7.2)
`
`Here, 1/τ is the frequency of spontaneous emission, which takes place without
`direct relation to external fields; Einstein coefficient B characterizes emission
`induced by an external electromagnetic field. The factors B and τ as well
`as A depend only on atomic parameters. If the first right-hand side term
`in Equation 6.7.2 corresponds to spontaneous emission, the second term is
`related to the stimulated emission. To find relations between the Einstein
`coefficients A, B and the spontaneous emission frequency 1/τ, analyze the
`thermodynamic equilibrium of radiation with the atomic system. In this case,
`the densities of atoms in lower and upper states (Figure 6.33) are related in
`accordance with the Boltzmann law (Equation 4.1.9) as
`(cid:3)
`(cid:4)
`nu = gu
`g0
`
`n0 exp
`
`− ω
`T
`
`,
`
`(6.7.3)
`
`where ω is energy difference between the two states, gu, g0 are their statistical
`weights. According to the Planck distribution, the average number of photons
`¯nω in one state can be determined as
`3(cid:3)
`(cid:4)
`¯nω = 1
`
`exp
`
`ω
`T
`
`− 1
`
`.
`
`(6.7.4)
`
`Taking into account, the balance of photon emission and absorption (see
`Figure 6.33)
`n0P(“0”, nω → “u”, nω − 1) = nuP(“u”, nω → “0”, nω + 1),
`
`(6.7.5)
`
`(6.7.6)
`
`which can be rewritten based on Equations 6.7.1 and 6.7.2 as
`(cid:3)
`(cid:4)
`n0A ¯nω = nu
`+ B¯nω
`
`.
`
`1 τ
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 5 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`412
`
`Plasma Physics and Engineering
`
`The relations between the Einstein coefficients A, B, and the spontaneous
`emission frequency 1/τ can be expressed based on Equations 6.7.3, 6.7.4, and
`6.7.6 as
`, B = 1
`A = gu
`τ .
`g0
`
`(6.7.7)
`
`1 τ
`
`The emission probability can be rewritten from Equations 6.7.2 and 6.7.7 as
`+ nω
`P(“u”, nω → “0”, nω + 1) = 1
`
`(6.7.8)
`
`.
`
`1 τ
`

`
`The contribution of the stimulated emission nω times exceeds the spon-
`taneous one. Although the expressions (Equation 6.7.7) for the Einstein
`coefficients were derived from equilibrium thermodynamics, the final Equa-
`tion 6.7.8 can be applied for the nonequilibrium number of photons nω.
`
`6.7.3 General Approach to Bremsstrahlung Spontaneous Emission:
`Coefficients of Radiation Absorption and Stimulated Emission during
`Electron Collisions with Heavy Particles
`The bremsstrahlung emission is related to the free–free electron transitions,
`and does not depend on external radiation like the spontaneous emission.
`An electron slows down in a collision with a heavy particle, ion, or neu-
`tral and loses kinetic energy, which then partially goes to radiation. A free
`electron cannot absorb or emit a photon because of the requirements of
`momentum conservation. Describe the bremsstrahlung emission at a specific
`frequency ω in terms of the differential spontaneous emission cross section:
`dσω(ve) = dσω/dωdω, which is a function of electron velocity ve. The emis-
`sion probability per electron of quanta with energies ω/ω + d(ω) can be
`given by the conventional definition:
`
`dPω = 1ωdQω = ven0dσω(ve) = ven0
`dσω
`dω dω.
`Here, dQω is the emission power per electron in the frequency inter-
`#
`val dω; n0 is density of heavy particles. The differential cross section of
`dω(ve) characterizes the spontaneous emis-
`bremsstrahlung emission dσω
`sion of plasma electrons during their collisions with heavy particles in the
`same way as the frequency 1/τ characterizes spontaneous emission of an atom
`(Equation 6.7.2). Also, similar to the Einstein coefficients A and B for atomic
`systems (see relations (Equations 6.7.1 and 6.7.2)), introduce coefficients aω(ve)
`and bω(ve) for radiation absorption and stimulated emission during the elec-
`tron collision with heavy particles. To introduce the coefficients aω(ve) and
`bω(ve), first define the radiation intensity I(ω) as the emission power in
`spectral interval ω/(ω + dω) per unit area and within the unit solid angle
`
`(6.7.9)
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 6 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`Electrostatics, Electrodynamics, and Fluid Mechanics of Plasma
`
`413
`
`(Ω, measured in steradians). The product Iωdω dΩ actually describes the den-
`sity of the radiation energy flux. Then the radiation energy from the interval
`dω dΩ absorbed by electrons with velocities ve/ve + dve in unit volume per
`unit time can be presented as
`(Iωdω dΩ)n0[ f (ve)dve] ×a ω(ve).
`This is the definition of the absorption coefficient aω(ve), which is actu-
`ally calculated with respect to one electron and one atom. In its definition in
`Equation 6.7.10, n0 is the density of heavy particles and f (ve) is the electron
`distribution function. Similar to Equation 6.7.10, the stimulated emission of
`quanta related to electron collisions with heavy particles can be expressed as
`(Iωdω dΩ)n0[f (v
`] ×b ω(v
`) is introduced with
`Here, the coefficient of stimulated emission bω(v
`respect to one electron and one atom. In accordance with the energy con-
`servation for absorption (Equation 6.7.10) and stimulated emission (Equa-
`tion 6.7.11), the electron velocities ve and v
`are related to each other as
`= mv2
`+ ω.
`2
`
`).
`
`(cid:2)e
`
`(cid:2)e
`
`(cid:2)e
`
`)dv
`
`(cid:2)e
`
`(cid:2)e
`
`e
`
`)2
`
`(cid:2)e
`
`m(v
`2
`
`(6.7.10)
`
`(6.7.11)
`
`(6.7.12)
`
`Similar to Equation 6.7.7, the coefficients of absorption aω(ve) and stimulated
`) of an electron during its collision with a heavy particle are
`emission bω(v
`related through the Einstein formula:
`(cid:3)
`(cid:4)
`aω(ve) =
`) = ve
`ε + ω
`v(cid:2)
`(6.7.13)
`aω(ve).
`bω(v
`Here, ε is the electron energy (as well as ε + ω). The stimulated emis-
`sion coefficient is related to the spontaneous bremsstrahlung emission cross
`section as
`

`
`1/2
`
`e
`
`(cid:2)e
`
`(cid:2)e
`
`(6.7.14)
`
`(cid:2)e
`
`)
`
`dσω(v
`dω .
`
`(cid:2)e
`
`) = π2c2v
`
`ω2
`
`(cid:2)e
`
`bω(v
`
`6.7.4 Bremsstrahlung Emission due to Electron Collisions
`with Plasma Ions and Neutrals
`According to classical electrodynamics, emission of a system of electric
`charges is determined by the second derivative of its dipole momentum
`
`¨(cid:20)d. In the case of an electron (characterized by a radius vector (cid:20)r) scattering
`¨(cid:20)d = −e¨(cid:20)r. In the case of electron–electron colli-
`¨(cid:20)d = −e¨(cid:20)r1 − e¨(cid:20)r2 = (−e/m) d/dt(m(cid:20)v1 + m(cid:20)v2) = 0 because of momentum
`
`by a heavy particle at rest:
`sions,
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 7 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`414
`
`Plasma Physics and Engineering
`
`conservation. This relation explains the absence of bremsstrahlung emission
`in the electron–electron collisions. Total energy, emitted by an electron during
`interaction with a heavy particle, can be expressed by (Landau, 1982):
`+∞(cid:2)
`
`dt.
`
`(6.7.15)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)2
`(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)¨(cid:20)r(t)
`E = e2
`6πε0c3
`−∞
`The Fourier expansion of electron acceleration ¨(cid:20)r(t) in Equation 6.7.15 gives
`the emission spectrum of the bremsstrahlung, the electron energy emitted per
`one collision in the frequency interval ω/(ω + dω):
`+∞(cid:2)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)
`
`−∞
`
`dEω = e2
`3πε0c3
`
`¨(cid:20)r(t) exp(−iωt)dt
`
`2
`
`(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)
`
`dω.
`
`(6.7.16)
`
`Taking into account that the time of effective electron interaction with heavy
`a particle is shorter than the electromagnetic field oscillation time, the integral
`in Equation 6.7.16 can be estimated as the electron velocity change Δ(cid:20)ve during
`scattering. This allows simplification of Equation 6.7.16:
`dEω =
`
`e2
`6π2ε0c3 (Δv2
`e) dω.
`Averaging Equation 6.7.18 over all electron collisions with heavy particles
`(frequency νm, electron velocity ve), yields the formula for dQω (see Equa-
`tion 6.7.9), which is the bremsstrahlung emission power per electron in the
`frequency interval dω:
`
`(6.7.17)
`
`e
`
`(6.7.18)
`
`dQω = e2v2
`νm
`3π2ε0c3 dω.
`Obviously, this formula of classical electrodynamics can only be used at rel-
`atively low frequencies ω < mv2
`e/2, when the electron energy exceeds the
`emitted quantum of radiation. At higher frequencies ω > mv2
`e/2, we should
`assume dQω = 0 to avoid the “ultra-violet catastrophe.” Based on Equations
`6.7.18 and 6.7.9, the cross section of the spontaneous bremsstrahlung emission
`of a quantum ω by an electron with velocity ve can be expressed as
`dσω = e2v2
`σm
`3π2ε0c3ω dω,
`Bremsstrahlung emission is related to an electron interaction with heavy
`particles; therefore its cross section (Equation 6.7.19) is proportional to the
`cross section σm of electron–heavy particle collisions. Equations 6.7.13 and
`
`e
`
`ω ≤ mv2
`2
`
`e
`
`.
`
`(6.7.19)
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 8 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`Electrostatics, Electrodynamics, and Fluid Mechanics of Plasma
`
`415
`
`6.7.14 then permit the derivation of formulas for the quantum coefficients
`of stimulated emission bω and absorption aω. For example, the absorption
`coefficient aω(ve) can be presented in this way at ω (cid:5) νm as
`(ε + ω)2
`
`aω(ve) = 2
`3εo
`
`e2ve
`mcω2
`
`σm(ε + ω),
`
`εω
`
`(6.7.20)
`
`where ε is electron energy before the absorption. Absorption and stimu-
`lated emission coefficients per one electron and one atom of Ar and He as
`a function of electron energy at a frequency of a ruby laser are presented in
`Figure 6.34. Plasma radiation is more significant in thermal plasma, where
`the major contribution in νm and σm is provided by electron–ion collisions.
`Taking into account the Coulomb nature of the collisions, the cross section of
`the bremsstrahlung emission Equation 6.7.19 is
`
`dσω =
`
`√
`
`16π
`3(4πε0)3
`
`3
`
`Z2e6
`m2c3v2ω.
`
`(6.7.21)
`
`Here, Z is the charge of an ion; in most of our systems under consideration
`Z = 1, but relation (Equation 6.7.21) in general can be applied to multicharged
`ions as well. Based on Equation 6.7.21, the total energy emitted in unit volume
`
`aω, bω, 10–39cm5
`
`aω
`
`bω
`
`Ar
`
`hω=1.78 eV
`
`aω
`
`bω
`
`He
`
`10
`
`20
`
`ε, eV
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`FIGURE 6.34
`Absorption coefficients per electron and per one Ar and one He atom.
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 9 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`416
`
`Plasma Physics and Engineering
`
`per unit time by the bremsstrahlung mechanism in the spectral interval dω is
`∞(cid:2)
`
`Jbrems
`

`
`dω =
`
`ωninef (ve)vedvedσω(ve).
`
`(6.7.22)
`
`vmin
`
`Here, ni and ne are concentrations of ions and electrons; f (ve) is the electron
`velocity distribution function, which can be taken here as Maxwellian; vmin =
`√
`2ω/m is the minimum electron velocity sufficient to emit a quantum ω.
`After integration the spectral density of bremsstrahlung emission (Z = 1) per
`unit volume, Equation 6.7.23 finally gives
`(cid:3)
`(cid:4)
`(cid:4)
`(cid:3)
`dω = 16
`e6neni
`2π
`m3/2c3(4πε0)3T1/2 exp
`(cid:4)
`3
`3
`= C
`− ω
`nine
`T1/2 exp
`T
`−45W cm3 K1/2 × ni(1/cm3)ne(1/cm3)
`= 1.08 × 10
`(T, K)1/2
`
`Jbrems
`

`
`1/2
`
`(cid:3)
`
`dω
`
`− ω
`T
`
`dω
`
`(cid:3)
`
`exp
`
`(cid:4)
`
`dω.
`
`(6.7.23)
`
`− ω
`T
`
`6.7.5 Recombination Emission
`This emission occurs during the radiative electron–ion recombination.
`According to the classification of emission in plasma, the recombination emis-
`sion is related to free-bound transitions because as a result of this process, a
`free plasma electron becomes trapped in a bound atomic state with negative
`discrete energy En. This recombination leads to emission of a quantum
`ω = |En| + mv2
`2
`Correct quantum mechanical derivation of the recombination emission
`cross section is complicated, but an approximate formula can be derived using
`the quasi-classical approach. Equation 6.7.21 was derived for bremsstrahlung
`emission when the final electron is still free and has positive energy. To cal-
`culate the cross section σRE of the recombination emission, generalize the
`quasi-classical relation (Equation 6.7.21) for electron transitions into discrete
`bound states. It can be done because the energy distance between high elec-
`tronic levels is quite small and hence quasi-classical. The electronic levels of
`bound atomic states are discrete; so here the spectral density of the recombi-
`nation cross section should be redefined taking into account number of levels
`Δn per small energy interval ΔE = Δω (around En):
`Δω = σREΔn,
`σRE = dσω
`dσω
`ΔE
`dω
`dω
`Δn
`
`(6.7.25)
`
`.
`
`1 
`
`e
`
`.
`
`(6.7.24)
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 10 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`Electrostatics, Electrodynamics, and Fluid Mechanics of Plasma
`
`417
`
`Consider the hydrogen like atoms (where an electron moves in the field of a
`charge Ze), then En = −IHZ2/n2. Here, IH = me4/22(4πε0)2 ≈ 13.6 eV is the
`hydrogen atom ionization potential, n is the principal quantum number. The
`ratio ΔE/Δn characterizing the density of energy levels is
`(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)dEn
`(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:17) = 2IHZ2
`
`≈
`
`ΔE
`Δn
`
`dn
`
`.
`
`n3
`
`(6.7.26)
`
`Based on Equation 6.7.22 and taking into account Equations 6.7.25 and
`6.7.26, the formula for the cross section of the recombination emission in an
`electron–ion collision with formation of an atom in an excited state with the
`principal quantum number n is obtained:
`
`(6.7.27)
`
`= 2.1 × 10
`
`−22cm2 (IHZ2)2
`εωn3 .
`
`1 n
`
`3
`
`e10Z4
`(4πε0)5c34mv2
`e
`

`
`σRE = 4
`√
`3
`
`3
`
`Here, ε is the initial electron energy. The total energy Jωndω, emitted as a
`result of photo-recombination of electrons with velocities in interval ve/ve +
`dve and ions with Z = 1, leading to formation of an excited atom with the
`principal quantum number n, per unit time and per unit volume is
`(cid:3)
`(cid:4)
`
`Jrecomb
`

`
`dω =
`
`Jωn.
`
`(ω)
`
`(6.7.29)
`
`Each of the individual terms in Equation 6.7.29 is related to the different
`principal quantum number n but giving the same frequency ω, and each is
`proportional to exp(−ω/T). The lowest possible principal quantum number
`(ω) can be defined from the condition |En∗| < ω < |En∗−1|. The spec-
`∗
`n
`trum of recombination emission corresponding to the sum Equation 6.7.29
`is illustrated in Figure 6.35.
`
`Jωndω = ωnineσREf (ve)vedve = C
`
`dω.
`
`(6.7.28)
`
`− ω
`2IH
`nine
`IH
`Tn3 exp
`T1/2
`Tn2
`T
`The parameter C = 1.08 × 10
`−45 W cm3 K1/2 is the same factor as in Equa-
`tion 6.7.23; f (ve) is the electron velocity distribution, which was taken as
`Maxwellian; the relation between electron velocity and radiation frequency
`from Equation 6.7.24 was written as: mvedve = dω. Emission of quanta with
`the same energy ω can be provided by trapping electrons on different exci-
`tation levels with different principal quantum numbers n (obviously, the
`electron velocities should be relevant and determined by Equation 6.7.24).
`The total spectrum of recombination emission is the sum of similar but shifted
`terms:
`∞(cid:10)
`n∗
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 11 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`418
`
`Plasma Physics and Engineering
`
`Jωrec
`
`Jωn
`

`
`ωn
`
`ωn–1
`
`FIGURE 6.35
`Recombination emission spectrum.
`

`
`dω.
`
`(6.7.30)
`
`,
`
`(6.7.31a)
`
`6.7.6 Total Emission in Continuous Spectrum
`The total spectral density of plasma emission in continuous spectrum consists
`of the bremsstrahlung and recombination components (Equations 6.7.23 and
`6.7.29). These two emission components can be combined in one approximate
`but reasonably accurate general formula for the total continuous emission:
`(cid:4)
`(cid:3)
`Jωdω = C
`nine
`ω
`T1/2
`T
`The parameter C = 1.08 × 10
`−45W cm3 K1/2 is the same factor as in Equa-
`tions 6.7.23 and 6.7.29; Ψ(x) is the dimensionless function, which can be
`approximated as
`(cid:17)(cid:17)
`(cid:17)(cid:17)Eg
`Ψ(x) = 1,
`if x = ω
`< xg =
`T
`T
`Ψ(x) = exp[−(x − xg)],
`if xg < x < x1
`(6.7.31b)
`Ψ(x) = exp[−(x − xg)] +2x 1 exp[−(x − x1)],
`if x = ω
`> x1 = I
`.
`T
`T
`(6.7.31c)
`(cid:17)(cid:17)Eg
`(cid:17)(cid:17) is the energy of the first (lowest) excited state of atom calcu-
`Here,
`lated with respect to transition to continuum; I is the ionization potential.
`When the radiation quanta and hence frequencies are not very large (ω <
`|Eg|), the contributions of free-free transitions (bremsstrahlung) and free-
`bound transitions (recombination) in the total continuous emission are related
`to each other as
`− 1.
`= exp
`
`Jrecomb
`

`
`/Jbrems
`

`
`ω
`T
`
`(6.7.32)
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 12 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`Electrostatics, Electrodynamics, and Fluid Mechanics of Plasma
`
`419
`
`According to Equation 6.7.32, emission ω < 0.7T is mostly due to the
`bremsstrahlung mechanism, while emission of larger quanta ω > 0.7T
`is mostly due to recombination mechanism. At plasma temperatures of
`10,000 K, this means that only infrared radiation (λ > 2μm) is provided
`by bremsstrahlung, all other emission spectrum is due to the electron–ion
`recombination. To obtain the total radiation losses, integrate the spectral den-
`sity (Equation 6.7.30) over all the emission spectrum (contribution of quanta
`ω > I can be neglected because of their intensive reabsorption). These total
`plasma energy losses per unit time and unit volume can be expressed after
`integration by the following numerical formula:
`(cid:11)
`(cid:12)
`(cid:13)
`1 +
`
`J,
`
`kW
`cm3
`
`= 1.42 × 10
`
`−37
`
`T, K neni(cm
`
`−3)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:17)
`
`(cid:17)(cid:17)Eg
`
`T
`
`.
`
`(6.7.33)
`
`6.7.7 Plasma Absorption of Radiation in Continuous Spectrum:
`The Kramers and Unsold-Kramers Formulas
`The differential cross section of bremsstrahlung emission (Equation 6.7.21)
`with Equations 6.7.13 and 6.7.14 permits determining the coefficient of
`bremsstrahlung absorption of a quantum ω calculated per electron having
`velocity ve and one ion:
`
`aω(ve) = 16π3
`√
`3
`3
`
`Z2e6
`m2c(4πε0ω)3ve
`
`.
`
`(6.7.34)
`
`This is the so-called Kramers formula of the quasi-classical theory of
`plasma continuous radiation. Multiplying the Kramers formula by neni and
`integrating over the Maxwellian distribution f (ve), yields the coefficient of
`bremsstrahlung absorption in plasma (the reverse length of absorption):
`(cid:3)
`(cid:4)
`
`2
`3π
`
`1/2
`
`e6
`(4πε0)3m3/2c
`
`.
`
`(6.7.35)
`
`3
`
`κbrems

`
`= C1
`
`neni
`
`T1/2ν3 , C1 = 2
`
`To use Equation 6.7.35 for numerical calculations of the absorption
`−1), the coefficient C1can be taken as: C1 = 3.69 ×
`coefficient κbrems
`(cm
`108cm5/s3 K1/2; here the frequency ν = ω/2π, and Z = 1. Another mechanism

`of plasma absorption of radiation in continuous spectrum is photoion-
`ization. The photoionization cross section can be easily calculated, taking
`into account that it is a reverse process with respect to recombination
`emission. Based on a detailed balance of the photoionization and recom-
`bination emission, Saha equations 4.1.15 and 6.7.27, the expression for the
`photoionization cross section for a photon ω and an atom with principal
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 13 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`420
`
`Plasma Physics and Engineering
`
`(cid:8)
`
`3
`

`
`neni
`
`quantum number n is
`(cid:7) ωn
`= 7.9 × 10
`σωn = 8π
`√
`−18cm2 n
`e10mZ4
`.
`(6.7.36)
`Z2
`(4πε0)5c6ω3n5
`3
`3
`Here, ωn = |En| / is the minimum frequency sufficient for photoionization
`from the electronic energy level with energy En and principal quantum
`number n. As seen from Equation 6.7.36, the photoionization cross sec-
`tion decreases with frequency as 1/ω3 at ω > ωn. To calculate the total
`(cid:18)
`plasma absorption coefficient in a continuum it is necessary to add to the
`bremsstrahlung absorption Equation 6.7.34, the sum
`n0nσωn related to
`the photoionization of atoms in different states of excitation (n) with con-
`centrations n0n. Replacing the summation by integration, the total plasma
`absorption coefficient in continuum can be calculated for Z = 1 as
`−3)
`κω = C1
`T1/2ν3 exΨ(x) = 4.05 × 10
`−1 neni(cm
`−23cm
`exΨ(x)
`.
`(6.7.37)
`(T, K)7/2
`x3
`Here, factor C1 is the same as in Equation 6.7.35; parameter x = ω/T;
`and the function Ψ(x) is defined by Equation 6.7.31. Obviously, the replace-
`ment of summation over discrete levels by integration makes the resulting
`approximate dependence κω(ν) smoother than in reality; this is illustrated
`in Figure 6.36 (Biberman and Norman, 1967). The relative contribution of
`photoionization and bremsstrahlung mechanisms in total plasma absorption
`of radiation in continuum at the relatively low frequencies ω < |Egs| (|Eg| is
`energy of the lowest excited state with respect to continuum) can be charac-
`terized by the same ratio as in case of emission (Equation 6.7.32). The product
`neni in Equation 6.7.37 can be replaced at not very high temperatures by the
`gas density n0using the Saha equation 4.1.15. At the relatively low frequencies
`ω < |Eg| the total plasma absorption coefficient in continuum is
`(cid:4)
`(cid:3)
`ω − I
`κω = 16π
`√
`e6Tn0
`gi
`exp
`4cω3(4πε0)3
`ga
`T
`3
`3
`−3)
`−(x1−x)
`= 1.95 × 10
`−7cm
`−1 n0(cm
`(T, K)2
`x3
`
`e
`
`gi
`ga
`
`.
`
`(6.7.38)
`
`This relation for the absorption coefficient is usually referred to as the
`Unsold–Kramers formula, where ga, gi are statistical weights of an atom and
`an ion, x = ω/T, x1 = I/T and I is the ionization potential. As an example,
`ω of red light λ = 0.65μm in an atmospheric pres-
`the absorption length κ−1
`sure hydrogen plasma at 10,000 K can be calculated from Equation 6.7.38 as
`ω ≈ 180 m. Thus, this plasma is fairly transparent in continuum at such con-
`κ−1
`ditions. It is interesting to note that the Unsold–Kramers formula can be used
`only for quasi-equilibrium conditions, while Equation 6.7.37 can be applied
`for nonequilibrium plasma as well.
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 14 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`Electrostatics, Electrodynamics, and Fluid Mechanics of Plasma
`
`421
`
`xωϕ/N, cm2
`10–17
`
`Xe
`
`20,000 K
`
`10,000 K
`
`v, 103 cm–1
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`7 5 3
`
`2
`
`10–20
`
`7 5 3
`
`FIGURE 6.36
`Absorption coefficient per one Xe atom, related to photoionization. Dashed line—summation
`over actual energy levels. Solid line—replacement of the summation by integration.
`
`6.7.8 Radiation Transfer in Plasma
`The intensity of radiation Iω decreases along its path “s” due to absorption
`(scattering in plasma neglected) and increases because of spontaneous and
`stimulated emission. The radiation transfer equation in quasi-equilibrium
`plasma can be then given as
`(cid:3)
`(cid:5)
`(cid:4)(cid:6)
`
`ω = κω
`κ(cid:2)
`
`1 − exp
`
`− ω
`T
`
`ω(Iωe − Iω),
`= κ(cid:2)
`
`dIω
`ds
`
`.
`
`(6.7.39)
`
`Here, the factor Iωe is the quasi-equilibrium radiation intensity
`
`Iωe = ω3
`4π3c2
`
`1
`exp(ω/T) − 1
`
`,
`
`(6.7.40)
`
`which can be obtained from the Planck formula for the spectral density
`(Equation 4.1.21). Introduce the optical coordinate ξ, calculated from the
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 15 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`422
`
`Plasma Physics and Engineering
`
`plasma surface x = 0 (with positive x directed into the plasma):
`ξ = x(cid:2)
`
`ω(x) dx, dξ =κ(cid:2)ω(x) dx.
`κ(cid:2)
`
`
`
`(6.7.41)
`
`0
`
`Then the radiation transfer equation can be rewritten in terms of the optical
`coordinate as
`− Iω(ξ) = −Iωe.
`dIω(ξ)
`(6.7.42)
`dξ
`Assuming that in direction of a fixed ray, the plasma thickness is “d”; x = 0
`corresponds to the plasma surface; and there is no source of radiation at
`x > d, then the radiation intensity on the plasma surface Iω0 can be expressed
`by solution of the radiation transfer equation as
`τω(cid:2)
`
`Iω0 =
`
`Iωe[T(ξ)] exp(−ξ) dξ,
`
`κ(cid:2)
`ωdx.
`
`(6.7.43)
`
`τω = d(cid:2)
`The quasi-equilibrium radiation intensity Iωe[T(ξ)] is shown here as a
`function of temperature and therefore an indirect function of the optical coor-
`dinate. In Equation 6.7.43, another radiation transfer parameter is introduced:
`τω is the optical thickness of plasma.
`
`0
`
`0
`
`6.7.9 Optically Thin Plasmas and Optically Thick Systems: Blackbody
`Radiation
`First assume that optical thickness is small τω (cid:10) 1; this is usually referred to
`as transparent or optically thin plasma. In this case, the radiation intensity on
`the plasma surface Iω0 (Equation 6.7.43) is
`τω(cid:2)
`τω(cid:2)
`
`Iω0 =
`
`Iωe[T(ξ)] dξ =
`
`ωdx = d(cid:2)
`Iωeκ(cid:2)
`
`jωdx.
`
`(6.7.44)
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Here, the emissivity term jω = Iωeκ(cid:2)
`ω corresponds to spontaneous emission.
`Equation 6.7.44 shows that radiation of optically thin plasma is the result of
`summation of independent emission from different intervals dx along the
`ray. In this case, all radiation generated in plasma volume is able to leave it.
`If plasma parameters are uniform, then the radiation intensity on the plasma
`surface can be expressed as
`
`
`Iω0 = jωd = Iωeκ(cid:2)ωd = Iωeτω (cid:10) Iωe.
`
`(6.7.45)
`
`Energetiq Ex. 2046, page 16 - IPR2015-01279
`
`

`
`Electrostatics, Electrodynamics, and Fluid Mechanics of Plasma
`
`423
`
`From Equation 6.7.45, the radiation intensity of the optically thin plasma is
`seen to be much less (τω (cid:10) 1) than equilibrium value (Equation 6.7.40) cor-
`responding to the Planck formula. The opposite case takes place when the
`optical thickness is high τω (cid:5) 1. This is usually referred to as the nontrans-
`parent or optically thick systems. If the quasi-equilibrium temperature can be
`considered constant in the emitting body, then for the optically thick systems
`(Equation 6.7.43) gives: Iω0 = Iωe(T). The emission density of the entire sur-
`face in all directions is the same and is equal to the equilibrium Planck value
`(Equation 6.7.40). This is the case of the quasi-equilibrium blackbody emis-
`sion, discussed in Section 4.1.5. Unfortunately, it cannot be directly applied
`to continuous plasma radiation (where the plasma is usually optically thin).
`The total black body emission per unit surface and unit time can be found
`by integration of the quasi-equilibrium radiation intensity (Equation 6.7.40)
`over all frequencies and all directions of hemispherical solid angle (2π)
`(cid:2)
`(cid:2)
`(cid:2)
`Je =
`Iωe cos ϑdΩ =
`πIωe(ω, T)dω = σT4.
`
`(6.7.46)
`
`dω
`
`2π
`
`This is the Stefan–Boltzmann law of blackbody emission. σ is the Stephan–
`Boltzmann coefficient (Equation 4.1.25); ϑ is the angle between the ray (Ω)
`and normal vector to the emitting surface.
`
`6.7.10 Reabsorption of Radiation, Emission of Plasma as Gray
`Body: The Total Emissivity Coefficient
`Plasmas are usually optically thin for radiation in the continuous spectrum,
`and the Stephan–Boltzmann law cannot be applied without special correc-
`tions. However, plasma is not absolutely transparent; the total emission can be
`affected by reabsorption of radiation. This can be illustrated by Equation 6.7.43
`for the radiation intensity Iω0 assuming fixed values of the quasi-equilibrium
`temperature and absorption coefficient (Equation 6.7.37)
`
`Iω0 = Iωe[1 − exp(−τω)] =I ωe[1 − exp(−κ(cid:2)ωd)] = Iωeε.
`Here, ε is the total emissivity coefficient, which characterizes the plasma

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket