throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`
`
`ASML NETHERLANDS B.V., EXCELITAS TECHNOLOGIES CORP., AND QIOPTIQ
`PHOTONICS GMBH & CO. KG,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`ENERGETIQ TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01277
`Patent 8,309,943
`_____________
`
`
`
`
`MAIL STOP PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Post Office Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`
`DECLARATION OF SAFRAZ W. ISHMAEL
`IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`
`
`Energetiq
`Exhibit 2001, Page 1
`Case IPR2015-01277
`
`

`
`I, Safraz W. Ishmael, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of
`
`Massachusetts. I am also admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court for
`
`the District of Massachusetts, the Eastern District of Texas, and the Western
`
`District of Wisconsin, as well as in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First and
`
`Federal Circuits.
`
`2.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the Commonwealth of
`
`Massachusetts.
`
`3.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`4.
`
`I have never been denied admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have never been subject to sanctions or contempt citations imposed
`
`by any court or administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`I have read and will comply with Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in title 37, part 42 of
`
`the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.).
`
`Energetiq
`Exhibit 2001, Page 2
`Case IPR2015-01277
`
`
`
`

`
`7.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Rules of Professional Responsibility set forth in parts 10 and 11 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`and to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`8.
`
`I have not appeared pro hac vice in any proceedings before the United
`
`States Patent and Trademark Office in the past three (3) years.
`
`9.
`
`I am Senior Counsel at the law firm of Proskauer Rose LLP
`
`(“Proskauer”). I joined Proskauer as an associate in 2011. I previously
`
`practiced law as an attorney at the law firms of Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault LLP
`
`from 2003 – 2005 and at Goodwin Procter LLP from 2005 – 2011.
`
`10.
`
`I am an experienced litigating attorney and have specific experience in
`
`patent law and patent law litigation. I have represented clients in numerous
`
`patent infringement actions across the country in various technical fields,
`
`including actions concerning optical transmitter devices, applied physics
`
`devices, semiconductor manufacturing devices, mechanical devices, electronics,
`
`and computer software, among other technologies.
`
`11.
`
`I have an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in
`
`IPR2015-01277. Specifically, I have reviewed the challenged patent, the
`
`Petition, and the accompanying exhibits. I represent Energetiq Technology,
`
`Inc. (“Energetiq”) in matters relating to its patents, including U.S. Patent No.
`Energetiq
`Exhibit 2001, Page 3
`Case IPR2015-01277
`
`
`
`

`
`8,309,943, which is the patent at issue in this IPR. For example, I represent
`
`Energetiq in Energetiq Technology, Inc. v. ASML Netherlands B.V., Excelitas
`
`Technologies Corp. and Qioptiq Photonics GMBH & Co. KG, 1:15-cv-10240-
`
`LTS, (the, “Litigation”) filed on January 30, 2015 and pending in the U.S.
`
`District Court for the District of Massachusetts, which involves the patent at
`
`issue in this IPR. I have been involved in preparing Energetiq’s patent
`
`infringement arguments and patent validity arguments, including such
`
`arguments as they relate to U.S. Patent No. 8,309,943, in the Litigation. I have
`
`been involved in the preliminary injunction proceedings in the Litigation, and
`
`as a result, I have reviewed and am familiar with the invalidity positions and
`
`prior art raised therein, and raised in this proceeding.
`
`12. Through my representation of Energetiq for at least over the last six
`
`months, and by working with Energetiq during that time to understand the
`
`technologies at issue, I have acquired substantial understanding of the
`
`technology at issue in this IPR, which pertains to laser-driven light sources and
`
`applied physics. My knowledge of this technology has been enhanced by my
`
`educational background: in addition to holding a juris doctor degree, I hold
`
`bachelor of science degrees in physics and computer science, and a master of
`
`science degree in physics.
`
`Energetiq
`Exhibit 2001, Page 4
`Case IPR2015-01277
`
`
`
`

`
`13.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my knowledge are true
`
`and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements were made with full knowledge that willful
`
`false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment,
`
`or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Proskauer Rose LLP
`
`/ Safraz W. Ishmael /
` Safraz W. Ishmael, Esq.
`
`Energetiq
`Exhibit 2001, Page 5
`Case IPR2015-01277
`
`
`
`
`Executed on July 9, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
`One International Place
`Boston, Massachusetts 02110
`sishmael@proskauer.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket