throbber
Covidien isjoining Medtronic
`
`LEAF-'*« r'~‘~<7RE
`
`Surgical Solutions
`
`‘}r”:!vlCL'—S
`'zZdm;.,‘=7.ir:i‘: 8 Tr.3in:n«_:
`Prnmiu-:23
`surgical Solutions > Products > Vessel sealing
`
`C(Zlll‘ir'_‘\)l
`
`Contact Us | share This
`
`
`
` Vessel Sealing /j
`
`3, ‘<
`
`Consistent, Reliable, Trusted Vessel Sealing
`
`Since irsinrioouciion tolhe martrelin 1993, Ligasure" technologyhassetlhe industry
`standard brvesel sealing. 1'hetechnology hasbeen used in more than 10 million
`research.
`procedures worldwide. and issupporhd by an ever-growing bodyotevidence-based
`
`5"?’10"'1—lU"5""<”’
`Ioclrnology 5t(i(-ks up against
`
`the Comlmnrn-on
`
`The clinical ellicacy, consistency and reliability orLigaSure"' pmduds is delivered through
`a variety of instruments for use in both laparoscopir: and open procedures.
`
`‘I
`
`3, ’ '
`,__ _
`
`Products
`
`Technology
`
`4
`
`133‘ '-
`Watch Video
`
`-"
`
`'
`
`
`
`'
`.-1
`
`Ligasure" Technology - Delivering Pertomrance Beyond Expectations
`Across the range ofproducts and procedures, LigaSure"'
`technology delivers a unique corrbination of pressure and
`energylo create a consistent seal with each application.
`
`Get M079 '"f°"“ati°"
`
`C ontact A Rep
`
`- Provides a combination otpressure and energy It create
`
`_.___
`
`4
`nrrrirrrrl ls
`
`-Z A
`-|
`vessel lusion
`_"'
`I"
`I I
`o Pemranentty luses vessels up to and including 7 mm in
`diameterand tissue bundles withoutdissection or isolation " ]
`- Average seal cycle is 2 to 4 seconds, when used with the
`_
`ForceTn‘ad"' energy platform
`
`'
`
`- sealswithstandlhreetimesnormalsystoliclnood pressure
`. Feedback-controlled response system aubmatically dlscontinues energy delivery when the seal
`cycle is complete, eliminating the guesswork
`
`1
`-
`J.
`l
`.
`__
`__
`m -—r--------~--—--—
`
`Ligasurem instruments have been found to:
`
`. Have the highest burst pressure, tasuast sealing time and were highest rated overall compared b
`Gyms PK""', Hamronic AcE"" and ENSFJL ""‘
`_ U
`. Reduce blood loss compared to sutures and clips
`
`Access 3 dmica. Wblicamn mat compares
`Ligasure" technology to three other vessel sealing
`technologies.
`
`. Reduce procedure ime compared to sutures”
`. Reduce patient length otstay compared b sutures 3
`
`[ Learn More 1
`
`compared 10 mechanical ligation techniques, Ligasure“ IGCIIIIOIOQY has been shown
`10:
`
`. significantly reduce operative blood loss in coloiectal, gynecologic and urologic surgery “
`0 Significantly reduce perioperative N000 ll3fISlIlSlOfl5 in gynecologic, urologic and general surgery ‘
`II II
`
`. significantly reduce procedure time in coloredal, gynecologic and urologic surgery '~°~’-9- '1 '3
`. significantly reduce length of hospital stay in gynecologic and urologic surgery ‘* ”
`
`compared to other energy-based modalities, Ligasure“ technology has been shown
`to:
`
`o significantly reduce operative blood loss in colorectal and gynecologic surgery ‘“7
`
`. Significantly reduce procedure lime in colorectal and gynecologic surgery “- "
`
`What is ‘I'issueFect“‘ sensing IOCIIIIOIOIIV?
`Page 1 of3
`
`Cflvldlfln
`
`V.
`IPR20l5—0l275
`
`

`

`

`

`

`
`TissueFect™ sensing technology is the control system for the ForceTriad™ energy platform, designed to
`precisely manage energy delivery, creating a range of options for desired tissue effect. TissueFect™ sensing
`technology monitors changes in tissue impedance 3,333 times a second, and adjusts energy output
`accordingly to deliver the appropriate amount of energy for the desired tissue effect.
`What is LigaSure™ tissue fusion?
`
`LigaSure™ vessel sealing technology has been updated and improved in the ForceTriad™ energy platform,
`controlled by TissueFect™ sensing technology. LigaSure™ tissue fusion, like LigaSure™ vessel sealing, uses
`the body’s own collagen and elastin to create a permanent fusion zone. This technology can fuse vessels up to
`and including 7 mm, lymphatics, tissue bundles and pulmonary vasculature, and has an average seal cycle of
`two to four seconds in most surgical situations.
`
`1 Lamberton GR, Hsi RS, Jin DH, Lindler TU, JellisonFC, Baldwin DD. Prospective comparison of four laparoscopic vessel ligation
`devices. J Endourol. 2008;22(10):2307­2312.
`
`2 Ding Z, Wable G, Rane A. Use of LigaSure bipolar diathermy system in vaginal hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25(1):
`49­51.
`
`3 Levy B, Emery L. Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet
`Gynecol. 2003;102(1):147­151.
`
`4 Targarona, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, biopolar computer­controlled
`electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative Outcome and Cost analysis. Surgical Innovation. 2005 Dec;12(4):339­344.
`
`5 Manouras, et al. Sutureless open low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with the use of the
`electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system. 2007. Med Sci Monit; 13(5): CR224­230.
`
`6 Ding Z, et al. Use of LigaSure bipolar diathermy system in vaginal hysterectomy. Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology. 2005
`Jan;25(1):49­51.
`
`7 Levy B, Emery L. Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy. Obstetrics
`and Gynecology. 2003 Jul;102(1):147­151.
`
`8 Tamussino K, et al. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing for radical abdominal hysterectomy. Gynecologic Oncology. 2005 Feb;
`96(2):320­322.
`
`9 Leonardo C, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy using LigaSure system: preliminary experience. Journal of Endourology. 2005
`Oct;19(8):976­8.
`
`10 Daskalopoulos G et al. Electrothermal bipolar coagulation for radical prostatectomies and cystectomies: a preliminary case­
`controlled study. International Urology and Nephrology. 2004;36(2):181­185.
`
`11 Romano F, et al. Laparoscopic Splenectomy: LigaSure versus EndoGIA: A Comparative Study. J Laparoendoscopic & Adv
`Surg Techniques. 2007. Vol. 17, No. 6.
`
`12 Cronje HS, et al. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Dec;91(3):243­
`5.
`
`13 Metzelder ML, et al. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in children: a prospective study on LigaSure versus Clip/Ligation. Eur J
`Pediatr Surg. 2006 Aug;16(4):241­4.
`
`14 Araki Y, et al. Clipless hand­assisted laparoscopic total colectomy using LigaSure Atlas. Kurume Medical Journal.
`2004;51(2):105­8.
`
`15 Campagnacci R, et al. Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic
`colectomies: a comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2007 Feb 8.
`
`16 Takada et al. Comparative study of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic
`colectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2005;19:226­228.
`
`17 Demirturk F, et al. Comparison of the use of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer with harmonic scalpel in total laparoscopic
`hysterectomy. J Obst Gynaecol Res. 2007; 33 (3):341­345.
`

`
`Service Centers Site Map
`
`© 2015 Covidien. All rights reserved.
`
`About Us
`
`Careers
`
`Surgical Products
`Surgical Stapling
`
`Vessel Sealing
`
`Ultrasonic Dissection
`

`
`Education & Training
`BioMed Connect™
`
`PACE Clinical Education
`
`Services
`

`

`

`

`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`
`Contact Us
`
`Legal Information
`
`Privacy Policy
`
`Compliance
`
`Hernia Repair
`
`Valleylab™ Exchange Software Update System
`
`Hand Instruments & Ligation Devices
`
`Medtronic Health Systems Advantage
`
`Electrosurgical Hardware & Accessories
`
`Medtronic Payer & Employer Solutions
`
`Electrosurgical Instruments & Accessories
`
`Smoke Evacuation Systems & Accessories
`
`Trocars & Access Instruments
`
`Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery
`
`Wound Closure
`
`Ablation Systems
`
`Sports Surgery
`
`Connect
`Events
`
`Sharing Healthcare Solutions
`
`Page 3 of 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket