throbber
I|||||Illlllll||l|l|||l|||||l|||||||||||||IlllllllllllllllllllllllIllllllll
`US0055l6497A
`
`United States Patent
`
`[191
`
`5,516,497
`May 14, 1996
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Speronello et al.
`
`[11]
`
`Patent Number:
`
`[54]
`
`[75]
`
`[73]
`
`[21]
`
`[22]
`
`[62]
`
`[51]
`[52]
`[53]
`
`[56]
`
`STAGED 1\/IETAL-PROMOTED ZEOLITE
`CATALYSTS AND METHOD FOR
`CATALYTIC REDUCTION OF NITROGEN
`OXIDES USING THE SAME
`
`Inventors: Barry K. Speronello, Belle Mead;
`John W. Byme, Edison; James M.
`Chen, Edison, all of N.J.
`
`Assignee: Engelhard Corporation, lselin, N.J.
`
`Appl. No.: 678,777
`
`Filed:
`
`Apr. 1, 1991
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`Division of Ser. No. 340,992, Apr. 20, 1989, Pat. No.
`5,024,981.
`
`Int. Cl.5 ............................ B01D 53/56; B0lD 53/58
`U.S. Cl.
`...................... .. 423/235; 423/237; 423/239.2
`Field of Search .............................. 423/213.2, 213.5,
`423/213.7, 235, 237, 239, 246, 239.2; 502/43
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 5
`
`3,970,739
`4,297,328
`4,961,917
`5,041,270
`
`7/1976 Shiraishi et al. ................... .. 423/235 S
`10/1981 Ritscher et al.
`. 423/213.2
`10/1990 Byme .............
`423/239
`B/1991 Fujitaniet al.
`...................... 423/213.2
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2133271
`2208190
`51-69476
`62-97629
`2-4453
`
`423/2112
`1/1973 Germany
`8/1973 Germany ............................ 423l213.7
`6/1976
`Japan .
`5/1987
`Iapan ..................................... 423/237
`1/1990
`Japan ..................................... 423/237
`
`Primary Exam:'ner—Ga1y P. Straub
`Assistant Examiner—Tirnothy C. Vanoy
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A zeolite catalyst composition is provided in which a first or
`upstream zone of the catalyst has a lower metal (e.g., iron or
`copper) promoter loading than the metal promoter rnoter
`loading of the second or downstream zone of the catalyst.
`The first zone may contain from none up to about 1 percent
`by weight of the promoter and the second zone may contain
`from about 1 to 30 percent by weight promoter. The zeolite
`may be any suitable zeolite, especially one having a silica-
`to-alumina ratio of about 10 or more, and a kinetic pore size
`of about 7 to about 8 Angstrorns with such pores being
`interconnected in all three crystallographic dimensions. The
`method -of the invention provides for passing a gaseous
`stream containing oxygen, nitrogen oxides and ammonia
`sequentially through first and second catalysts as described
`above,
`the first catalyst favoring reduction of nitrogen
`oxides and the second catalyst favoring the oxidation or
`other decomposition of excess ammonia.
`
`12 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets
`
`so
`
`so
`
`40
`
`20
`
`
`
`CONVERSION(°/o)
`
`/3‘.
`
`,4/'
`
`g
`
`,4"
`
`
`
`
`
`. .
`
`.
`
`.
`
`. ..+
`
`____t3\
`
`D
`
`REACTION/REAGENT
`D SCR/NOx
`+ SCR/NH3
`
`as NH3 Ox./NH3
`
`0.1
`I
`I0
`
`Cu LOADING ON ZEOLITE (wf.°/cl
`
`JM 1008
`
`1
`
`JM 1008
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 14, 1996
`
`Sheet 1 of 3
`
`5,516,497
`
`mxzxxoMIZum
`
`m.._z\momIT
`
`xozkomUezmoqmmxzoioqmm
`
`-.noan
`
`(°/o) NOISHEANOO
`
`_.0_..._
`
`
`
`Ao\o.t.>Vn.:._._omN2002540:.:0.__.O
`
`_0.0
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 14, 1996
`
`Sheet 2 of 3
`
`5,516,497
`
`1:;
`
`X
`
`0
`
`C!
`
`X
`
`<>
`
`D
`
`X
`0
`
`Cl)‘:
`_
`‘E
`:3
`
`*3 D
`x
`
`0 D
`
`% D
`
`D
`
`0
`
`D
`
`u 2.8 FE BETA
`
`o 2.5 cu BETA
`
`90
`so
`
`'
`
`2 Q
`
`E 70
`{$1
`60
`
`2 50
`
`O 0
`
`40
`3 so
`
`$ 20
`
`'0
`x 4.4 FE BETA
`
`250
`300
`350
`400
`450
`500
`550
`600
`
`INLET GAS TEMPERATURE-°C
`
`3
`
`Z O 50
`
`:
`Lu
`
`> §0 0Z 5
`
`250
`
`300
`
`350 _
`
`400
`
`450
`
`500
`
`550
`
`lNLET GAS TEMPERATURE'°C
`
`F|G.Z’A
`
`3
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 14, 1996
`
`Sheet 3 of 3
`
`5,516,497
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`TO
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`HOURS OF
`
`
`
`300
`
`350
`
`400
`
`450
`
`500
`
`INLET GAS TEM PERATURE‘°C
`
`FIG. 4
`
`°/oNOCONVERSION
`
`
`
`°/.NH3CONVERSION
`
`0 4.4 FE BETA
`
`13 NH4 BETA
`
`300
`550
`600
`250
`350
`400
`450
`500
`
`INLET GAS TEMPERATURE'°C
`
`FIG. 5
`
`4
`
`

`
`5,516,497
`
`1
`STAGED METALPROMOTED ZEOLITE
`CATALYSTS AND METHOD FOR
`CATALYTIC REDUCTION OF NITROGEN
`OXIDES USING THE SAIVIE.
`
`This is a divisional of application Ser. No. 07/340,992
`filed on Apr. 20, 1989, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,024,981.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. The present invention is concerned with mcta.l-pro-
`moted zeolite catalysts and a method for the catalytic
`reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia using the cata-
`lysts, including carrying out such catalytic reduction selec-
`tively ‘in the presence of oxygen. 2. The Related Art
`Both synthetic and natural zeolites and their use in
`promoting certain reactions, including the selective reduc-
`tion of nitrogen oxides with ammonia in the presence of
`oxygen, are well known in the art. Zeolites are aluminosili—
`cate crystalline materials having rather uniform pore sizes
`which, depending upon the type of zeolite and the type and
`amount of cations included in the zeolite lattice, range from
`about 3 to 10 Angstroms in diameter.
`Japanese Patent Publication (Kokai) No. 51-69476, pub-
`lished Jun. 16, 1976 on Application No. 49-142463, filed
`Dec. 13, 1974, discloses a method for reducing nitrogen
`oxides in waste gases by reaction with ammonia in the
`presence of a metal-promoted, dealuminizcd synthetic or
`natural mordenite zeolite. The resistance of the catalyst to
`sulfurous poisons, particularly sulfur trioxide and sulfuric
`acid mist, is said to be enhanced by dealuminizing the
`mordenite to increase the silica to alumina ratio to more than
`12, preferably to more than 15. The zeolite is promoted with
`0.5 to 30 weight percent of at least one of a number of metals
`including copper, vanadium, chromium,
`iron, cobalt or
`nickel, and is used at a reaction temperature of 200° to 500°
`C. with from 0.5 to three times the stoiehiometric amount of
`ammonia reductant. Example 1 of the Publication illustrates
`an iron-promoted mordenite ore as being effective for the
`reduction of nitrogen oxides. In connection with Example 2
`of the Publication, it is stated that a slight decrease of the
`activity of a dealuminizcd, i.e., high silica to alumina ratio,
`copper-promoted mordenite catalyst
`is recognized when
`sulfur trioxide is included in the gas stream. However, an
`“extreme improvement” of resistance to sulfur trioxide
`poisoning is noted in comparison with a copper mordenite
`which has not been dealuminizcd to increase its silica to
`alumina ratio.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`UK Patent Application 2,193,655A discloses a catalyst
`containing a low surface area titania and a copper-promoted
`zeolite for use in the reduction of nitrogen oxides with ,
`ammonia. The zeolite has an average pore diameter of 10
`Angstroms or less, preferably 8 Angstrorns or less, and a
`silica to alumina molar ratio of 10 or more, preferably 20 or
`more; the resultant titania/promoted zeolite catalysts having
`these characteristics are stated to be resistant to volatile
`catalyst poisons such as arsenic, selenium, tellurium, etc.,
`contained in exhaust gases. Examples of suitable zeolites are
`mordenite, ZSM-5 and ferrierite.
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,297,328 discloses a “three way conver-
`sion” catalytic process for the simultaneous catalytic oxida-
`tion of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons and reduction of
`nitrogen oxides for purifying the exhaust gas of automobile
`engines operated within a prescribed range of air to fuel ratio
`(column 4, lines 63-68). The disclosed catalyst is stated to
`be a copper-promoted zeolite having a silica to alumina ratio
`
`2
`greater than 10, preferably greater than 20 (column 6, lines
`2348). Representative high-silica zeolites are described at
`columns 6-8 of the patent and include (column 6, lines
`29-33) silicalite (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,061,724),
`ZSM—5, ZSM-8, ZSM-ll, ZSM-12, hyper Y, ultrastabilized
`Y, Beta, mordenite and erionite. Ultrastabilized Y is
`described (column 7, lines 22-25) as “a form of zeolite Y
`which has been treated to give it the organophilic charac-
`teristic of the adsorbents of the present invention.” Example
`6 of the patent is stated to show no measureable loss in
`combustion activity of the copper-promoted zeolite catalyst
`due to sulfer poisoning (exposure of the catalyst to meth-
`ylmereaptan in the gaseous stream). The patent thus dis-
`closes the utility of the copper-promoted specified zeolites
`for three-way conversion in an exhaust gas generated by a
`lean air to fuel ratio combustion mixture.
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,302,431 discloses method and apparatus
`for controlling the content of nitrogen oxides in gases,
`including a first stage of high temperature, uncatalyzed
`reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia, followed by a
`second, catalyzed stage in which decomposition of residual
`nitrogen oxides and ammonia (column 4, lines 44-49) is
`carried out. Example 1 discloses the use of calcium silicate
`plates impregnated with ferric sulfate as the catalyst, and the
`patentee notes (column 6, lines 36-42) that other catalysts
`having denitrifying capacity, such as chromium and vana-
`dium, may also be utilized.
`U.S. Pat. No. 3,970,739 discloses (colunm 3, lines 32-46)
`mixing gases obtained from an ammonia synthesis plant
`waste water stream with flue gases so as to provide about 0.3
`to 10 moles of ammonia per mole of nitrogen oxides. The
`resultant gaseous mixture is contacted in a first stage with a
`metal catalyst to reduce nitrogen oxides and any unreacted
`ammonia is then decomposed in a second stage in the
`presence of a suitable catalyst; the process is carried out at
`a temperature of from 150° to 700° C. The first stage catalyst
`may be platinum or palladium, or oxides of copper, vana-
`dium, molybdenum or nmgsten, or a metal complex oxide
`such as an iron-chromium complex oxide (column 5, line 53
`et seq). The second stage catalyst may be any suitable
`catalyst (colunm 7,
`lines 1-7) such as iron-chromium,
`chromium-mangnesia, and chromium plus one or more of
`tin, antimony vanadium, cobalt phosphorus zinc, nickel,
`titanium, molydbenum and tungsten (column 6, line 59).
`Separate catalytic reactors or a single reactor containing the
`first and second stage catalysts in sequence, may be used.
`The art thus shows an awareness of the utility of metal-
`promoted zeolite catalysts including, among others, iron-
`promoted and copper-promoted zeolite catalysts, for the
`selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammo-
`nia. The art also shows an awareness of providing a two-
`stage process in which, in a first stage, a thermal or catalyzed
`process may be used for the reduction of nitrogen oxides
`with ammonia and, in a second stage, residual ammonia is
`decomposed to nitrogen.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`Generally, the present invention provides a metal-pro-
`moted zeolite catalyst and a method for using the same in the
`selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammo-
`nia, in which the promoter loading on the catalyst is staged
`so that the promoter loading in a first or upstream zone of the
`catalyst is lower than the promoter loading in a second or
`downstream zone of the catalyst. It has been found that by
`‘thus staging the promoter loading on a suitable zeolite
`
`5
`
`

`
`5,516,497
`
`3
`
`catalyst, the first zone catalyst favors the selective catalytic
`reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia whereas the
`second catalyst zone favors the oxidation of (excess or
`residual) ammonia to nitrogen.
`More specifically, in accordance with the present inven-
`tion there is provided a method for reacting nitrogen oxides
`with ammonia in a gaseous stream, the method comprising
`the following steps. A gaseous stream containing nitrogen
`oxides and ammonia is passed through a first catalyst zone
`containing a first zeolite catalyst which is optionally pro-
`moted with not more than about 1% by weight of an iron
`and/or copper promoter, calculated as the metal and based on
`the weight of metal plus the first zeolite. The gaseous stream
`is contacted within the first zone with the first catalyst under
`conditions etfective to reduce nitrogen oxides with ammonia
`and leave residual ammonia in the gaseous stream. The
`nitrogen oxides-depleted gaseous stream containing residual
`ammonia obtained as above is then passed through a second
`catalyst zone containing a second zeolite catalyst which is
`promoted with more than about 1% by weight of an iron
`andlor copper promoter, calculated as the metal and based on
`the weight of metal plus the second zeolite. The nitrogen
`oxides-depleted gaseous stream is contacted within the
`second zone with the second catalyst in the presence of
`oxygen and under conditions effective to oxidize ammonia
`to nitrogen, and the resultant ammonia-depleted gaseous
`stream is then withdrawn.
`
`In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the
`first zeolite catalyst may contain, for example, from about
`0.1 to about 1% by weight of the promoter, e.g., iron; the
`second zeolite catalyst may contain from more than about
`1% to 30% by weight of the promoter, e.g., iron, preferably
`from about 2% to 5% by weight promoter, both calculated
`as the metal and based on the weight of promoter (as metal)
`plus the respective zeolite.
`Other aspects of the invention include introducing ammo-
`nia into the gaseous stream, for example, in an amount to
`provide from about 0.7 to 2 moles of anmionia per mole of
`nitrogen oxides. In another aspect of the invention, the
`reaction is carried out at a temperature of from about 200°
`C. to 600" C., e.g., from about 300° C. to 550° C.
`Still other aspects of the invention include utilizing cata-
`lysts as described below in the methods described above.
`
`Compositional aspects of the present invention provide a
`catalyst composition effective for reducing nitrogen oxides
`with ammonia in a gaseous stream. The composition has a
`first catalyst and a second catalyst, as sensed relative to the
`sequence of flow of the gaseous stream through the com-
`position, and comprises the following components. A first
`catalyst comprises a first zeolite which is optionally pro-
`moted with not more than about 1%»by weight of an iron
`and/or copper promoter dispersed therein, calculated as the
`metal and based on the weight of metal plus the first zeolite.
`A second catalyst comprises a second zeolite promoted with
`more than about 1% by weightof an iron and/or copper
`promoter dispersed therein, calculated as the metal and
`based on the weight of metal plus second zeolite.
`In another aspect of the invention, the first zeolite catalyst
`comprises an iron and/or copper-promoted zeolite catalyst,
`preferably an iron-promoted zeolite catalyst.
`In yet another aspect of the invention, at least one, and
`preferably both, of the first zeolite catalyst and the second
`zeolite catalyst have a silica to alumina ratio of 0 or higher
`and an average pore kinetic diameter of from about 7 to
`about 8 Angstroms. The zeolite pore structure may be
`interconnected in all three crystallographic dimensions by
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`pores having a kinetic diameter of about 7 to about 8
`Angstroms.
`As used herein and in the claims, reference to a “first”
`catalyst or catalyst zone and a “second” catalyst or catalyst
`zone is made with reference to the sequence of introduction
`therein of a gaseous stream to be treated. Thus, the “first”
`catalyst is the upstream catalyst and the “second” catalyst is
`the downstream catalyst, with “upstream" and “down-
`stream” being as sensed in the direction of flow of the treated
`gaseous steam therethrough.
`References herein and in the claims to a zeolite catalyst
`containing a percent “by weight” promoter means a percent-
`age calculated as the weight of promoter, as the metal,
`divided by the combined weights of promoter (as the metal)
`plus the zeolite.
`Reference herein and in the claims to “metal", “iron” and
`“copper” with respect to the promoters should not be taken
`to imply that the promoter is necessarily in the elemental or
`zero.valence state; the terms enclosed in quotes should be
`understood to include the presence of promoters as they
`exist in the catalyst compositions, e.g., as exchanged ions
`andlor impregnated ionic or other species.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 of the drawings is a plot showing the percent
`conversion of nitrogen oxides and ammonia in a treated
`gaseous stream, versus the copper loading of a zeolite
`catalyst;
`FIG. 2 is a plot showing the percent conversion of NO
`versus inlet temperature for various metal-promoted zeolite
`catalysts;
`FIG. 3 is a plot showing the percent conversion of NO
`versus the inlet temperature of a gaseous stream to be treated
`for aged and fresh copper-promoted zeolite catalysts;
`FIG. 4 is a plot showing the percent conversion of N0
`versus inlet temperature of a gas stream passed through aged
`and fresh iron promoted beta zeolite catalysts; and
`FIG. 5 is a plot showing the percent conversion of
`anunonia versus inlet temperature of a gas stream fed to
`different beta zeolite catalysts.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION AND PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS ‘THEREOF
`
`In order to reduce the emissions of nitrogen oxides from
`flue and exhaust gases, such as the exhaust generated by gas
`turbine engines, anunonia is added to the gaseous stream
`containing the nitrogen oxides and the gaseous stream is
`then contacted with a suitable catalyst at elevated tempera-
`tures in order to catalyze the reduction of nitrogen oxdes
`with ammonia. Such gaseous streams, for example,
`the
`products of combustion of an internal combustion engine or
`of a gas-fueled or oil-fueled turbine engine, often inherently
`also contain substantial amounts of oxygen. A typical
`exhaust gas of a turbine engine contains from about 2 to 15
`volume percent oxygen and from about 20 to 500 volume
`parts per million nitrogen oxides, the latter normally com-
`prising a mixture of NO and N02. Usually, there is suflicient
`oxygen present in the gaseous stream to oxidize residual
`ammonia, even when an excess over the stoichiometric
`amount of anunonia required to reduce all
`the nitrogen
`oxides present is employed. However, in cases where a very
`large excess over the stoichiometric amount of ammonia is
`utilized, or wherein the gaseous stream to be treated is
`
`6
`
`

`
`5,516,497
`
`5
`
`lacking or low in oxygen content, an oxygen-containing gas,
`usually air, may be introduced between the first catalyst zone
`and the second catalyst zone, in order to insure that adequate
`oxygen is present in the second catalyst zone for the oxi-
`dation of residual or excess ammonia. Metal-promoted zeo-
`lites can be used to promote the reaction of ammonia with
`nitrogen oxides (“NO,,”) to form nitrogen and H20 selec-
`tively over the‘ competing reaction of oxygen and ammonia.
`The catalyzed reaction of ammonia and nitrogen oxides is
`therefore sometimes referred to as the selective catalytic
`reduction (“SCR”) of nitrogen oxides or, as sometimes
`herein, simply as the “SCR process”.
`Theoretically, it would be desirable in the SCR process to
`provide ammonia in excess of the stoiehiometric amount
`required to react completely with the nitrogen oxides
`present, both to favor driving the reaction to completion and
`to help overcome inadequate mixing of the ammonia in the
`gaseous stream. However, in practice, significant excess
`ammonia over such stoichiometric amount is normally not
`provided because the discharge of unreacted ammonia from
`the catalyst to the atmosphere would itself engender an air
`pollution problem. Such discharge of unreacted ammonia
`can occur even in cases where ammonia is present only in a
`stoichiometric or sub-stoichiomettic amount, as a result of
`incomplete reaction and/or poor mixing of the ammonia in
`the gaseous stream, resulting in the formation therein of
`channels of high ammonia concentration. Such channeling is
`of particular concern when utilizing catalysts comprising
`monolithic honeycomb-type carriers comprising refractory
`bodies having a plurality of fine, parallel gas flow paths
`extending therethrough because, unlike the case of beds of
`particulate catalyst, there is no opportunity for gas mixing
`between channels.
`
`The present invention is predicated on the surprising
`discovery that the selectivity of a zeolite catalyst can be
`tailored to favor either (1) the SCR process, i.e., the reduc-
`tion of nitrogen oxides with ammonia to form nitrogen and
`H20, or (2) the oxidation of ammonia with oxygen to form
`nitrogen and H20, the selectivity being tailored by control-
`ling the promoting metal content of the zeolite. More
`specifically, it has been found that at metal loading levels,
`e.g., iron or copper, on zeolites which do not exceed about
`1 percent by weight metal, calculated as the metal and based
`on the combined weight of metal plus the zeolite, selectivity
`for the SCR reaction, even in the presence of oxygen, is
`significantly favored over the oxidation of ammonia by
`oxygen. It has also been discovered that at metal loadings on
`the zeolite above about 1 percent by weight metal, same
`basis as above, selectivity of the catalyst is shifted towards
`the oxidation of ammonia by oxygen at the expense of the
`SCR process, thereby improving ammonia removal.
`The above principles are utilized by providing a staged or
`two-zone catalyst in which a first catalyst zone with no or a
`low metal promoter (iron or copper) loading on a zeolite,
`that is, fiom 0 to not more than about 1 percent by weight
`metal, is followed by a second catalyst zone comprising a
`zeolite having thereon a metal loading in excess of about 1
`percent by weight. The resultant catalyst composition thus
`has a first (upstream) zone which favors the reduction of
`nitrogen oxides with ammonia, and a second (downstream)
`zone which favors the oxidation of ammonia. In this way,
`when ammonia is present in excess of the stoichiometric
`amount, whether throughout the fiow cross section of the
`gaseous stream being treated or in localized channels of high
`ammonia concentration, the oxidation of residual ammonia
`by oxygen is favored by the downstream or second catalyst
`zone. The quantity of ammonia in the gaseous stream
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`discharged from the catalyst is thereby reduced or elimi-
`nated.
`'
`
`Generally, any suitable zeolite material may be utilized in
`the catalyst compositions of the invention. Many zeolites
`demonstrate good thermal stability and so stand up well to
`high temperatures, thereby enabling the treatment of rela-
`tively high temperature gaseous streams without precooling.
`For example, turbine engine exhausts typically have a tem-
`perature in the range of about 450° to 600° C. This tem-
`perature range is too high for selective catalytic reduction
`catalysts such as those based on the anatase form of titania
`because, at such elevated temperatures, the -anatase converts
`to a less catalytically active rutile form. It thus becomes
`necessary, when using such temperature-sensitive catalysts,
`to invest in heat exchange equipment to cool the gaseous
`stream before treating it catalytically to reduce the nitrogen
`oxides. However, by utilizing suitable zeolite catalysts in
`accordance with the teachings of the present invention, high
`temperature gaseous streams, for example, gaseous streams
`at temperatures up to about 600° C., may be treated without
`seriously adversely affecting the life or efiiciency of the
`catalyst. Suitable promoted zeolite materials demonstrate
`sufiicient
`thermal and hydrothermal stability to survive
`turbine exhaust conditions and provide an acceptably long
`life and efliciency of the catalysts. The zeolite materials
`employed should have a silica to alumina molecular ratio of
`greater than loin order to enhance their resistance to acidic
`conditions, as discussed in more detail below. Preferably, the
`zeolite materials are medium to large pore zeolites having
`pore openings of at least about 4 Angstroms in diameter.
`Such openings are large enough to admit the reactants and
`products and to catalyze or otherwise facilitate the desired
`reactions.
`
`The gaseous streams containing nitrogen oxides may also
`contain sulfur oxides, especially sulfur dioxide. For
`example, the exhaust of a turbine engine which is operating
`on a liquid fuel, such as a number 2 fuel oil, may contain
`from about 10 to 150 parts per million of sulfur dioxide. The
`tolerance of the catalyst material for such sulfurous con-
`taminants is increased, i.e., the catalyst is rendered more
`resistant to sulfur poisoning, by selecting a zeolite of a larger
`average pore size than that which is necessary to admit the
`reactants and products. Specifically, an average pore size of
`about 7 Angstroms or more, e.g., about 7 to about 8
`Angstroms is preferred for enhanced resistance to sulfur
`poisoning. The most preferred types of zeolite for resistance
`to sulfur poisoning are those which have a pore system in
`which the 7 to 8 Angstrom diameter pores are interconnected
`in all three crystallographic dimensions. Such zeolite mate-
`rials are described in detail in co-pending and commonly
`owned patent application Ser. No. 341,405, filed Apr. 20,
`1989, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,961,917, of John W. Byme,
`entitled “Zeolite Catalysts and Method For Reduction of
`Nitrogen Oxides VV1th Ammonia Using the Same”,
`the
`disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein and made
`part hereof. As disclosed in the aforesaid co-pending patent
`application, a particularly suitable class of such sulfur-
`resistant zeolite materials is comprised of Beta zeolites,
`ultrastable Y (“USY”) zeolites and ZSM-20 zeolites. Gen-
`erally, silica to alumina ratios well in excess of the minimum
`of 10 may be employed. Conversion eflieiencies of 90 to
`93% for NO, reduction with ammonia have been attained
`with fresh copper promoted zeolite having silica to alumina
`ratios of 20, 26, 28, 37 and 62. A conversion efficiency of
`77% was attained by a fresh copper promoted ZSM-5 zeolite
`having a silica to alumina ratio of 50. However, fresh copper
`promoted USY zeolites with silica to alumina ratios of,
`
`7
`
`

`
`5,516,497 .
`
`7
`respectively, 8 and 30 provided 85% and 39% conversions
`of NO,,, suggesting that at least for USY, silica to alumina
`ratios should be significantly less than 30.
`The catalysts of the present invention comprise one or
`more suitable zeolite materials arranged in at least a first and
`second zone in which the first zone is either not promoted
`with a metal or has a promoter loading not in excess of 1
`percent by weight metal, and the second zone has a greater
`promoter loading than the first zone, the second zone con-
`taining more than about 1 percent by weight metal. Any
`suitable physical form of the catalyst may be utilized, such
`as a monolithic honeycomb-type body containing a plurality
`of fine, parallel gas flow passages extending therethrough,
`the walls of which are coated with the zeolite catalytic
`material. Typically, such monolithic bodies are made of a
`refractory ceramic material such as cordierite, mullite or
`alumina, and the catalytic material coating the fine gas flow
`passages is contacted by the gaseous stream as it flows
`through the gas flow passages. The first or inlet section or
`zone of such a monolith body will be prepared with a lower
`copper loading than the second or downstream zone of the
`same monolith body. This can be readily accomplished by
`dipping one end if the monolith into a slurry of a low- or
`no-copper containing zeolite, and the other end of the
`monolith into a slurry of a more heavily copper-loaded
`zeolite. Alternatively, separate monolith bodies may be used
`for the first and second zones.
`'
`
`The catalyst may also take the form of a packed bed of
`pellets,
`tablets, extrudates or other particles or shaped
`pieces, such as plates, saddles, tubes or the like. The physical
`configuration of the catalyst used in a given case will depend
`on a number of factors such as the space available for the
`catalytic reactor, the activity of the catalyst material utilized,
`and the permitted or desired amount of pressure drop across
`the catalyst bed. When catalysts are used to treat engine
`exhausts, such as the exhaust gas of a turbine engine, it is
`usually desired to minimize pressure drop in order to
`enhance the efliciency of the engine. In such cases, the
`preferred physical configuration of the catalyst is one which
`provides parallel flow passageways for the gas, such as those
`found in the above-described honey—comb-type catalysts.
`Other arrangements providing such parallel flow passage-
`ways include the use of parallel plates or stacked tubes.
`Because of its ease of handling and installation as well as
`good mass transfer characteristics relative to other parallel
`passage configurations, a highly preferred physical configu-
`ration of the catalysts of the invention is a monolithic
`honeycomb member having a relatively high cell (flow
`passageway) density of approximately 60 cells or more per
`square inch of end face of the honeycomb member. The
`walls defining the gas flow passages (or cells) are desirably
`as thin as possible consistent with the requisite mechanical
`strength of the honeycomb. Thus, the catalysts of the inven-
`tion may take the form of a monolithic honeycomb canier,
`the gas flow passages of which comprise or are coated with
`a zeolitic catalyst material with staged copper loadings as
`described above. For example, a catalytically inert honey-
`comb carrier member, such as a cordierite carrier, may be
`coated with a washcoat of fine particles of copper-promoted
`zeolite. Alternatively, a powder of copper-promoted zeolite
`may be mixed with a binder and extruded into the honey-
`comb configuration. In another approach, the catalytic mate-
`rial may be formed in situ by preparing the honeycomb
`structure from a zeolitic precursor raw material which is
`then treated to form the zeolitic material as part of the
`honeycomb structure, followed by copper impregnation. In
`this regard, see U.S. Pat. No. 4,157,375, assigned to the
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`'
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`the disclosure of which is
`
`8
`assignee of this application,
`hereby incorporated herein.
`Reference is made below to the weights of solids being on
`a “vf basis”. The term in quotes means a volatiles-free basis,
`and is used to indicate the weight that the solid in question
`would have if it were calcined at 1000° C. to drive off
`volatiles. Thus, if 10.1 grams of a substance contains 0.1
`gram of such volatiles, the 10.1 grams is reported as “l0
`grams (vf basis)”. Unless specifically otherwise stated, all
`weight percents herein and in the claims are stated on a vf
`basis.
`
`The following examples demonstrate the efficacy of cer-
`tain embodiments of the present invention.
`
`Example 1
`
`In order to demonstrate the effect of the promoter loading
`on zeolite catalyst selectivity as between (1) selective cata-
`lytic reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia and (ii)
`ammonia oxidation with oxygen, a series of catalysts were
`prepared as follows.
`I. A catalyst consisting of a honeycomb ceramic support
`coated with a washcoat of synthetic mordenite zeolite con-
`taining 0.12% by weight Cu (expressed as the metal), was
`prepared as follows:
`1. 100 g (vf basis) of Linde LZM-8 mordenite zeolite
`powder was added to 200 g of an aqueous Cu(S04)
`solution containing 0.6 g of Cu.
`2. This slurry was heated to 82° C. with stirring to suspend
`the solids, and maintained at 82° C. for about 30
`minutes.
`
`3. It was then vacuum (filtered to separate the solids from
`the liquid.
`4. The solid was washed with an equal volume of water,
`and then dried at 100° C.
`
`5. Chemical analysis showed the solid to contain 0.12%
`by weight Cu.
`6. 48.5 g (vi) of the dried powder was added to 81 g of
`deionized water and milled for 1 hour at about 50 rpm
`in a 500 ml polyethylene jar filled 1/2 full of alumina
`cylinders (ca. 0.5 in. diax0.5 in. long).
`7. 3.5 ml of glacial acetic acid was then added to the mill,
`and milling was continued for another 15 hours.
`8. The milled slurry was coated on to a cordierite mono-
`lithic support comprising a one inch (2.5 cm) diameter
`by three inches (7.6 cm) long cylindrical core drilled
`from a cell/in: cordierite support purchased from
`Applied Ceramics Co. The coating was carried out by
`immersing the weighed support into the slurry, gently
`agitating the support to remove entrapped air from the
`channels, removing the saturated support from the
`slurry, and removing excess slurry from the channels by
`blowing with compressed air.
`9. After drying at 110° C. and calcining for 1 hour at 450°
`C., the coated support was weighed, and the washcoat
`loading was calculated to be about 1.6 g/ina. The
`resultant catalyst is designated Catalyst I.
`II. A catalyst consisting of a honeycomb ceramic support
`coated with a washcoat of pentasil zeolite having the ZSM—5
`crystal structure, a silica to alumina molar ratio of 46/1 (by
`chemical analysis), and containing 0.27% by weight Cu
`(expressed as the metal) was prepared as follows:
`1. 168 g (vf basis) of the pentasil zeolite powder was first
`calcined for 2 hours at 316° C. followed by 2 hours at
`
`8
`
`

`
`5,516,497
`
`9
`
`593° C. then added to 504 g of an aqueous Cu(SO4)
`solution containing 15.1 g of Cu.
`2. This slurry was heated to 82° C. with stirring to suspend
`the solids then maintained at 82° C. for 1 hour.
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket