`
`Term
`No.
`1
`
`Proposed Term or
`Phrase
`Fuelling rate
`(1, 2)
`
`Construction
`
`Support1
`
`mass of fuel per cylinder per cycle.
`
`‘365 Patent Specification
` Abstract
` Col. 2:3-6
` Col. 2:6-10
` Col. 3:10-12
` Col. 3:48-52
` Col. 4:6-11
` Col. 5:50-57
`
`Start of injection for at least one
`cylinder is before top-dead-center.
`
`2
`
`the timing of the
`introduction of fuel
`into the at least one
`cylinder being
`maintained at before
`top dead centre
`(BTDC)
`(1)
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony may be provided regarding the proposed construction
`of this claim term in the context of the ordinary skill in the art as of
`the priority date of this patent.
`
`
`‘365 Patent Specification
` Fig. 1 and Fig. 2
` Col. 2: 9-10, 12-14, 59-63
` Col. 3: 1-3, 5-8
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony may be provided regarding the proposed construction
`of this claim term in the context of the ordinary skill in the art as of
`the priority date of this patent.
`
`
`
`
`1 References to figures include the corresponding description in the specification, and references to the specification include the figures associated with the
`reference.
`
`-1-
`
`BOSCH-DAIMLER EXHIBIT 1009
`
`Page 1 of 7
`
`
`
`3
`
`up to about 30° ATDC
`(5)
`
`within a window from 0 to 30 degrees
`after top dead center.
`
`‘365 Patent Specification
` Claim 6
` Fig. 2
` Col. 1:65 – Col.2:3
` Col. 3:1-9
` Col. 3:41-44
`
`4
`
`fuel is introduced at
`between 60° to 80°
`BTDC.
` (9)
`
`the start of injection occurs in the
`window between 80 to 60 degrees
`before top dead center.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony may be provided regarding the proposed construction
`of this claim term in the context of the ordinary skill in the art as of
`the priority date of this patent.
`
`
`‘365 Patent Specification
` Col. 2: 9-12
` Figs. 1-2
` Col. 3:1-9
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony may be provided regarding the proposed construction
`of this claim term in the context of the ordinary skill in the art as of
`the priority date of this patent.
`
`-2-
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`
`
`5
`
`catalytic treatment
`means
`(10, 12)
`
`Structure:
`a device that contains a catalyst and
`treats the exhaust gases from the
`engine to decrease the undesirable
`contaminants therein.
`
`Function:
`contains a catalyst and treats the
`exhaust gases from the engine to
`decrease the undesirable contaminants
`therein
`
`6
`
`a level higher that that
`required when the
`engine is operating
`normally
`(1)
`
`a value greater than that demanded
`when the catalytic converter is above
`its light-off temperature and ignition
`timing is before top-dead-center.
`
`‘365 Patent Specification
` Fig. 3
` Col.1: 4-9; 10-15
` Col 2: 15-17, 23-25
` Col 3: 13-16, 52-59
` Col 4: 56-61
` Col 5: 13-18
` Col 6: 1-3
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony may be provided regarding the proposed construction
`of this claim term in the context of the ordinary skill in the art as of
`the priority date of this patent.
`
`
`Heywood, J.B., Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-
`Hill, 1988, at 649-657.
`365 Patent Specification
` Fig. 1
` Abstract
` Col. 1: 11-15; 19-21; 61-64
` Col. 5: 24-29; 41-46
`
`EP365- 94904919 File History
`Letter to European Patent Office Boards of Appeal, Dated 26-May-
`1998, Page 3
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony may be provided regarding the proposed construction
`of this claim term in the context of the ordinary skill in the art as of
`the priority date of this patent.
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`
`
`7
`
`maximum load
`(2)
`
`Engine peak torque output.
`
`
`
`365 Patent Specification
` Col. 2: 3-6
` Col. 3: 10-12
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony may be provided regarding the proposed construction
`of this claim term in the context of the ordinary skill in the art as of
`the priority date of this patent.
`
`
`Heywood, J.B., Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-
`Hill, 1988, at 46, 824-27, 873, and 883.
`
`8
`
`9
`
`additional air is
`introduced upstream
`(12)
`
`supplemental air is
`added into the exhaust system before
`the inlet
`
`
`365 Patent Specification
` Col. 2: 22-23
` Col. 4: 1-6
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony may be provided regarding the proposed construction
`of this claim term in the context of the ordinary skill in the art as of
`the priority date of this patent.
`
`required operating
`temperature
`(14)
`
`light off temperature, taken as the
`temperature at which the catalyst
`is 50% efficient.
`
`
`365 Patent Specification
` Col. 1:11-17; 19-21
` Col. 5:15-18
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony may be provided regarding the proposed construction
`of this claim term in the context of the ordinary skill in the art as of
`the priority date of this patent.
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`
`
`10
`
`sensed or determined
`(14)
`
`measured or identified
`
`365 Patent Specification
` Col. 2: 28-29
` Col. 5: 8-12, 41-46
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony may be provided regarding the proposed construction
`of this claim term in the context of the ordinary skill in the art as of
`the priority date of this patent.
`
`11
`
`predetermined
`operating condition
`(18)
`
`temperature of the catalytic treatment
`means is determined to be above
`the light-off temperature of the
`catalytic material.
`
`
`365 Patent Specification
` Col. 4: 62-67
` Col. 5: 1-5; 24 -29
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony may be provided regarding the proposed construction
`of this claim term in the context of the ordinary skill in the art as of
`the priority date of this patent.
`
`12
`
`normal operation
`(18)
`
`functioning as when the catalytic
`convertor is above its light-off
`temperature and ignition timing is
`before top-dead-center
`
`
`365 Patent Specification
` Fig. 1
` Abstract
` Col. 1: 11-15
` Col. 1: 19-21
` Col. 1: 61-64
` Col. 5: 24-29; 41-46
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Expert testimony may be provided regarding the proposed construction
`of this claim term in the context of the ordinary skill in the art as of
`the priority date of this patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-5-
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`
`
`
`Orbital Australia PTY LTD et al v. Daimler AG et al.
`3:14-cv-808-REP
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
` I, Ashley McDonough, hereby certify that on May 8, 2015 true and correct copies of the
`foregoing document were served upon all counsel of record via electronic mail.
`
`Jeff Gerchick
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`777 6th Street, NW, 11th Floor
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`
`Dabney Jefferson Carr, IV
`Troutman Sanders LLP (Richmond)
`1001 Haxall Point
`Richmond, VA 23219
`804-697-1238
`
`Robert Armistead Angle
`Troutman Sanders LLP
`Troutman Sanders Bldg
`1001 Haxall Point
`PO Box 1122
`Richmond, VA 23219
`(804) 697-1246
`
`Edward DeFranco
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Flr.,
`New York, NY 10010
`212.849.7106
`
`Brett Watkins
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`777 6th Street, NW, 11th Floor
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`202 538 8000
`
`Counsel for Daimler AG, Mercedes-Benz US
`International Inc. and Mercedes-Benz USA,
`LLC
`
`Elizabeth Diane Ferrill
`Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett &
`Dunner LLP
`901 New York Ave NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`202-408-4445
`
`
`
` Electronic Mail
`elizabeth.ferrill@finnegan.com
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
` Electronic Mail
`jeffgerchick@quinnemanuel.com
`dabney.carr@troutmansanders.com
`robert.angle@troutmansanders.com
`eddefranco@quinnemanuel.com
`brettwatkins@quinnemanuel.com
`MB_Orbital@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`
`
`
`Orbital Australia PTY LTD et al v. Daimler AG et al.
`3:14-cv-808-REP
`202-408-4400 (fax)
`
`Lionel Marks Lavenue
`Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett &
`Dunner LLP
`11955 Freedom Dr
`Reston, VA 20190
`571-203-2700
`202-408-4400 (fax)
`
`
`Counsel for Robert Bosch, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/Ashley McDonough__
`Ashley McDonough
`Pepper Hamilton LLP
`19th Floor, High Street Tower
`125 High Street
`Boston, MA 02110-2736
`617.204.5174
`
`
`Page 7 of 7
`
`