throbber
Rapid #: -9319873
`
`CROSS REF ID:
`
`574208
`
`LENDER:
`
`HUA :: Main Library
`
`BORROWER:
`
`NJR :: Main Library
`
`TYPE:
`
`Article CC:CCL
`
`JOURNAL TITLE:
`
`European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
`
`USER JOURNAL TITLE: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
`
`ARTICLE TITLE:
`
`Intragastric pH and serum gastrin during administration of different doses of pantoprazole in
`healthy subjects.
`
`ARTICLE AUTHOR:
`
`Koop, Koop
`
`VOLUME:
`
`ISSUE:
`
`MONTH:
`
`YEAR:
`
`PAGES:
`
`ISSN:
`
`OCLC #:
`
`8
`
`9
`
`9
`
`1996
`
`915-918
`
`0954-691X
`
`Processed by RapidX:
`
`5/19/2015 9:44:19 PM
`
`This material may be protected by copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`

`
`Unfilled
`-
`‘
`Pending
`Batch'Printed
`
`l
`
`AZU ,
`HUA
`HUA
`
`Main Library
`Main Library
`Main Librar
`
`5/20/2015 5:53:33 AM-
`5/20/2015 5:58:54 AM
`5 20/2015 6:02:04 AM
`
`CALL #:
`
`616.3 E89 J8 G25
`
`LOCATION:
`TypE;
`
`HUA :: Main Library :: medse
`Article CC:CCL
`:
`.
`
`JOURNAL TITLE;
`
`European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
`
`USER JOURNAL TITLE;
`l HUA‘ CATALOG TITLE;
`ARTICLE TITLE;
`‘
`
`ARTICLE AUTHOR:
`VOLUME:
`ISSUE:
`
`MONTH:
`YEAR:
`
`5 European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
`European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
`Intragastric pH and serum gastrin during administration of different doses of
`pantoprazole in healthy subjects.
`KooP: KOOD
`8
`9
`
`
`
`9
`1996
`
`PAGES:
`
`‘
`
`_
`
`915-918
`
`ISSN:
`
`om; #;
`
`0954-691X
`
`HUA OCLC #: 20609040
`
`CROSS REFERENCE 1:);
`VERIFIED:
`
`[TN:574208][ODYSSEY:128.6.218.9’l/RULILL] '
`
`BORROWER:
`
`.
`
`V
`
`H
`
`:
`
`_
`.
`111.
`
`’ NJR :: Main Library
`
`This material may be protected by copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`5/20/2015 8:33:06 AM
`
`https://rapid2library.colostate.edu/I11/ViewQueue?ViewType=AgingUnder24HrsOldBySit... 5/20/2015
`
`

`
`satisfactorily.
`
`University of Hong Kong Liloraries
`© The copy is for purposes of private
`study or scholarly research only,
`H
`
`You should delete the file as soon as a
`single paper copy has been printed out
`
`

`
`Jig
`
`
`
`
`
`gastric pH and serum gastrin were performed on the 7th day of treatment by continuous pH
`recording and radioimmunoassay in blood samples obtained in 1—h intervals, respectively.
`Results: Pantoprazole significantly increased gastric pH above basal at all pantoprazole
`doses studied: median 24-h pH rose from 1.2 without therapy to 3.4, 3.3 and 3.6 at 40, 80
`and 120 mg daily, respectively. The corresponding integrated 24-h gastrin output was 1632,
`2338 and 2248 pg/ml><24h compared to 575 pg/ml><24h without pantoprazole. There was
`no interindividual correlation between values of 24-h median pH and 24-h gastrin output at
`any pantoprazole dose studied. However, fasting gastrin levels closely correlated with 24-h
`gastrin output (r=O.789; P< 0.0001). The acid inhibitory effect was significantly (P< 0.01)
`augmented in Helicobacter pylori positive subjects.
`
`is concluded that pantoprazole is an effective inhibitor of gastric acid secre-
`Conclusion: It
`tion. lncreasing a single pantoprazole dose above 40 mg does not lead to increased median
`pH elevation. The individual extent of acid inhibition does not predict the magnitude of
`gastrin elevation. Acid inhibition appears more efficient in Helicobacter pylori positive
`subjects.
`
`European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 1996, 82915-918
`Keywords: acid secretion, gastrin, healthy subjects, Helicobacter pylori,
`intragastric pH, pantoprazole
`
`Introduction
`
`Gastric acid exerts a constant inhibitory influence on the
`antral gastrin—produeing G-cell (‘acid brake’)
`In
`conditions with low gastric acidity or achlorhydria [2],
`gastrin levels markedly increase, often exceeding levels of
`1000 pg/ml whereas hypergastrinaemia is only of slight or
`moderate magnitude during treatment with potent antise-
`cretory drugs such as proton pump inhibitors [3—5] despite
`profound and long—lasting suppression of acid secretion at
`least in some individuals [3,4]. In the present study, the
`interrelationship between intragastric pH and changes in
`the 24-h profile of serum gastrin was investigated using
`various doses of the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole.
`Pantoprazole is a new substituted benzimidazole with
`
`potent acid inhibitory efficacy which is devoid of interac—
`tion with the cytochrome P450 system at therapeutic
`dosages
`After activation within the acidic compart-
`ment pantoprazole binds covalently to the Ht/K*-ATPase
`of the gastric parietal cell thus inhibiting the final step of
`acid secretion [7]. In clinical studies, pantoprazole
`markedly suppressed basal and stimulated acid secretion [8]
`to an extent comparable to omeprazole [9].
`
`Methods
`
`Subjects
`In this randomized, prospective, double—blind crossover
`trial, 15 healthy subjects (5 females, 10 males; age 22-31
`
`From the Department of internal Medicine ll, Klinikum Buch, Berlin, *Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine,
`Philipps—University, Marburg and *Byk Gulden, Konstanz, Germany.
`Requests for reprints to Prof. Dr Herbert Koop, Department of Internal Medicine ll, Klinikum Buch, Karower Strasse 11, D-
`13122 Berlin, Germany.
`Date received: 30 April 1996; accepted: 6 June 1996.
`
`© Rapid Science Publishers ISSN 0954-691X
`
`
`
`

`
`ment were started in an identical manner with further pH
`recordings and gastrin measurements on the seventh day
`of therapy. Treatment was with 40, 80 and 120 mg daily,
`and the different doses were studied i11 random order
`using a double-blind crossover design.
`
`pH recordings and gastrin profiles
`Continuous 24-h pH recordings were performed on an
`in—patient basis. A glass electrode (Ingold 440 M 4, Ingold,
`Urdorf, Switzerland) connected to a solid state recorder
`(Mark II; Synectics, Frankfurt, Germany) previously cali-
`brated with buffcrs ofpH 1 and 7.4 was placed transnasally
`into the proximal stomach 5cm below the cardia;
`the
`cardia was identified by a drop in pH below pH 4. After
`successful placement of the electrode, the length from the
`nasal
`tip was documented during the primary pH
`recording without therapy and identically placed in subse-
`quent recordings. The proper placement of the electrode
`during pantoprazole treatment was additionally checked
`fluoroscopically. Intragastric pH was recorded for a
`complete 24-h period in 6-s intervals. After completion of
`the recordings, data were evaluated using an established
`computer program (Esophogram, Gastrosoft). For each
`course of treatment,
`the median 24-h pH and the
`percentage of time with pH above 4 were determined;
`additionally,
`these parameters were calculated separately
`for the time frames of 7.00 am to 7.00 pm and 7.00 pm to
`7.00 am.
`
`Mann—Whitney U test. Differences at the 5% level were
`considered significant. The study was approved by the
`Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Philipps—
`University 0fMarburg.
`
`Results
`
`The pH profile under basal condition showed a typical
`circadian pattern with increases in intragastric pH in
`response to meals. Treatment with 40 mg of pantoprazole
`given for 7 days markedly increased 24-h pH from a
`median of 1.2 (basal) to 3.4 (Fig. 1, Table 1). The
`profound inhibition of acid secretion is also exemplified
`by the increase in time with pH above 4 (Table 1).
`Administration of pantoprazole doses exceeding 40 mg
`did not result in a further increase in median pH or time
`with pH above 4 (Table 1); however, subjects showing
`only moderate increases in intragastric pH with the lower
`pantoprazole dose (e.g. median pH 1.3 to 2.2 at the 40
`mg dose) exhibited further elevations of median pH
`reaching values above 2.3 in all cases and above 3.0 in 13
`out of 15 cases at the highest pantoprazole dose studied
`(Fig. 1).
`to profound suppression of acid secretion,
`Parallel
`serum gastrin levels increased in response to 40mg panto-
`7
`
`MedianpH
`
`0
`
`80 mg
`40 mg
`Daily Dose
`
`120 mg
`
`Three milllilitres of blood were obtained from an
`indwelling catheter placed in an antecubital vein at 1—h
`intervals (apart from 2—h intervals between 12.00 am and
`6.00 am). Blood samples were centrifuged and stored at
`—20°C until assayed. Gastrin concentration was deter-
`mined by means of a sensitive and specific radioi1n—
`munoassay previously described in detail [10]. Serum
`samples from all four courses were run in the same assay
`in order to reduce the influence of interassay variation. In
`addition to blood samples taken at regular intervals for
`gastrin determination, routine laboratory values were
`measured on each final day of treatment. IgG and IgA
`antibodies to Helicobacrer pylori (H.p.) were determined by
`enzyme—linked immunosorbent assay using whole cell
`lysate antigen (Pyloristat [11]; Helicobacter pylori ELISA®,
`Serva, Heidelberg, Germany). Only individuals with IgG
`
`Fig. 1. Median 24-h intragastric pH in response to increasing doses
`of pantoprazole in 15 healthy volunteers. Closed symbols and solid
`lines indicate Helicobacter pyIori—negative subjects, open symbols
`and dotted line H. pylori positive subjects.
`
`
`
`

`
`*95% confidence intervals in brackets; * P< 0.05 or less vs. Control without therapy; “P < 0.05 vs. 40 mg pantoprazole.
`
`respectively; P< 0.005) and 120 mg (5.3 versus 3.4,
`respectively; P<0.005). No differences in median 24-h
`pH without antisecretory treatment, nor in 24-h gastrin
`both without therapy and during treatment with panto-
`prazole, were detected between volunteers positive and
`negative for H. pylori antibodies.
`Pantoprazole doses up to 120mg daily were well toler-
`ated. The volunteers did not report any adverse events
`during the whole study period. There were no changes in
`any of the standard laboratory parameters at any dose of
`pantoprazole.
`
`Discussion
`
`Data from the present study confirm that pantoprazole is
`an effective and well-tolerated acid inhibitory drug
`comparable to omeprazole. This matches well with results
`from clinical trials in which pantoprazole exerted healing
`rates in acid peptic diseases also comparable to omeprazole
`[13—16]. Pantoprazole doses exceeding 40mg did not
`induce a further progressive increase in intragastric pH
`though the 24-h median pH further rose in those subjects
`responding less markedly at the lowest dose studied. It
`seems reasonable to assume that divided doses should
`result in further inhibition of acid secretion when panto-
`prazole is administered in higher amounts than 40 mg
`daily, as with other proton pump inhibitors [17]. This
`assumption is presently under investigation.
`The profound and long—lasting increase in intragastric
`pH in response to the proton pump inhibitor resulted in
`an enhanced secretory activity of the gastrin producing G-
`cell. Unlike its effect on gastric acidity, there was a dose
`relationship between the pantoprazole dose and the eleva-
`tion of gastrin secretion. The progressive increase in 24-h
`integrated gastrin output is probably due to enhanced
`antisecretory activity of higher pantoprazole doses in those
`subjects who revealed only moderate suppression of acid
`secretion at the 40 mg dose. Based upon the close correla-
`tion between a single fasting serum gastrin level obtained
`24h post dose and 24-h integrated gastrin output, the
`gastrin concentration in a fasting serum sample offers a
`
`
`
`prazole compared to gastrin levels without therapy.
`However, in contrast to pantoprazole effects on gastric
`acidity, integrated gastrin responses further increased
`during administration of 80mg and 120mg pantoprazole
`reaching the level of significance at the highest dose
`studied (Table 1).
`In the basal state without any antisecretory treatment,
`there was a significant correlation between median 24-h
`pH and integrated serum gastrin (r: 0.72; P< 0.002).
`However, no correlation was observed during pantopra-
`zole therapy at any dose: coefficients of correlation varied
`between 0.187 and 0.266 (P> 0.1). Fasting gastrin levels
`(obtained at 7.00 am prior to repeat dosing and breakfast)
`showed a highly significant correlation (r=0.798; P<
`0.0001) with 24-h integrated gastrin output (Fig. 2).
`The effect of H. pylori status on the acid inhibitory
`effect and on serum gastrin levels was studied retrospec-
`tively (Fig. 1). In three subjects positive for H. pylori IgG
`antibodies, acid inhibition was more pronounced at 40 mg
`pantoprazole (median 24-h pH 5.5; 11:3) than in those 12
`subjects negative for H. pylori antibodies (median 24-h pH
`3.2; P<0.01). Similar differences were observed at panto—
`prazole doses of 80 mg (median 24-h pH 5.0 versus 3.1,
`
`E 12
`VN
`X
`
`10
`
`8
`
`5
`4
`
`2
`0
`
`c
`
`.
`
`.
`° ‘
`
`.
`0'
`.,'
`u 0 '
`-
`r
`50
`
`.
`,5-'
`
`0
`
`.
`
`0
`
`I‘—
`100
`
`I
`150
`
`I
`200
`
`E
`an
`
`5.
`
`5 5
`
`ca
`0
`E
`E
`.3
`5
`
`Basal Gastrin (pg/ml)
`
`Fig. 2. Correlation between basal gastrin levels obtained before
`dosing and 24-h integrated gastrin in the basal state and after
`1-week continuous therapy with 40-120 mg pantoprazole daily.
`All determinations available irrespective of treatment were plotted.
`r=O.798; P<0.0001.
`
`
`
`

`
`though this
`pump inhibitors and gastrin release [18—19]
`has not been observed in a preliminary study using panto-
`prazole [20]. In the present study IgG antibodies were
`used as a marker for H. pylori infection because this para-
`meter has been found to be as reliable as the urea breath
`
`test [11], which is regarded the gold standard for the diag-
`nosis of H. pylori infection. Subjects positive for IgG anti-
`bodies against H. pylorl revealed a more pronounced anti-
`secrctory effect in response to pantoprazole than those
`who were negative. These data — though obtained in a
`small number of volunteers and therefore preliminary —
`are in agreement with previous reports of higher acid
`suppressing activity of omeprazole in H. pylori positive
`subjects [18,19]. The mechanism underlying the enhanced
`acid inhibitory activity of proton pump inhibitors is spec-
`ulative at present; gastritis related phenomena and
`increased buffer production by H. pylori have been
`suggested as major factors [18].
`In conclusion, pantoprazole is an effective inhibitor of
`gastric acid secretion. Increasing a single dose above 40mg
`does not lead to increased acid secretion. The individual
`
`extent of acid secretion does not predict the magnitude of
`gastrin release; however, determination of the basal gastrin
`level 24 h post close enables a very close estimate of
`changes occurring during the 24-h period. Infection with
`H. pylori seems to augment the acid inhibitory effect of
`pantoprazole in healthy subjects.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`This study was supported by grants from Byk Gulden,
`Konstanz, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft,
`Bonn—Bad Godesberg, grant K0 847/2-1. The skilful
`technical assistance of Mrs E. Bothe—Sandfort is gratefully
`acknowledged, The authors are indebted to Dr Mehl and
`D02. Dr Scholz, Dept of Microbiology, Klinikum Buch,
`Berlin, for determination of antibody titres to H. pylori.
`
`pantoprazole in the gastric H+/K+-ATPase. Biochim Biopliys
`Acta Bio—A/tembr 1993, 114B:223—233.
`Simon B, Muller P, Marinis E, Liihmann R, Huber R, Hartmann
`M, et al.: Effect of repeated oral administration of BY
`1023/SK&F 96022 — a new substituted benzimidazole derivative
`— on pentagastrin stimulated gastric acid secretion and pharma-
`cokinetic in man. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1990, 41:373-379.
`Hartmann M, Theilé U, Bliesath H, Kuhn I, Ltihmann R, Huber R,
`et al.: 24-h intragastric pH following oral intake of pantoprazole
`and omeprazole. HelleniC]Ga5tr0enter0l1992, 5(supp|. 21:113.
`Mayer 6, Arnold R, Feurle G, Ketterer H, Fuchs K, Track NS, et
`al.: Influence of feeding and sham feeding upon serum gastrin
`and gastric acid secretion in control subjects and duodenal
`ulcer patients. 5candlGa5troenterol1973, 9:703—710.
`Glupczinski Y: Methodological aspects of serology for the diag-
`nosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Eur] Gastroenterol
`Hepat0l1993, 5(suppl. 2):S50—S53.
`Cutler AF, Havstad S, Ma CK, Blaser MJ, Perez—Perez GI, Schubert
`TT: Accuracy of invasive and noninvasive tests to diagnose
`Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterology 1995, 109:1 3&1 41 .
`Mtjssner J, Holscher AH, Herz R, Schneider A: A double-blind
`study of pantoprazole and omeprazole in the treatment of
`reflux oesophagitis: a multi-centre trial. Aliment Pharmacol
`Tl1er1995, 9:321—326.
`Witzel L, Giitz H, Htittemann W, Schepp W: Pantoprazole
`versus omeprazole in the treatment of acute gastric ulcers.
`Aliment Pliarmacol Ther 1995, 9:19—24.
`Beker JA, Bianchi Porro G, Bigard MA, Delle Fave G, Devis G,
`Gouerou H, et al.: Double-blind comparison of pantoprazole
`and omeprazole in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. Eur]
`Castroenterol Hepatol 1995, 71407-410.
`Corinaldesi R, Valentini M, Belaiche J, Colin R, Geldof H, Maier
`C, et a/.: Pantoprazole and omeprazole in the treatment of
`reflux oesophagitis: a European multicentre study. Aliment
`Pharmacol Ther1995, 9:667—671.
`Kuo B, Castell DO: Omeprazole 20 mg BID provides better acid
`suppression than a single dose of 40 mg [abstract].
`Gastroenterology 1994, 106:A1034.
`Verdi] E, Armstrong D, Idstrom JP, Labenz J, Stolte M, Dorla G, et
`al.: Effect of curing Helicobacter pylori infection on intragastric pH
`during treatment with omeprazole. Gut1995, 36:743-748.
`Labenz J, Tillenburg B, Peitz U, Verdti E, Stolte M, Tillenburg G,
`et al.: Helicobacter pylori augments the pH-increasing effect of
`omeprazole in patients with duodenal ulcer. Gastroenterology
`1996,110Z725—732.
`McC0l| KEL, El NAM, Dorrian CA, MacDonald AM, Fullarton,
`Harwood J: Helicobacter pylori and hypergastrinaemia during
`proton pump inhibitor therapy. Scandj Gastroenterol 1992,
`27:93—98.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket