`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 28
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`SONY CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`RAYTHEON COMPANY,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01201
`Patent 5,591,678
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF JACOB
`ZWEIG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01201
`
`
`I. Relief Requested
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, Petitioner Sony Corporation requests
`
`that the Board admit Jacob Zweig pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`II. Statement of Facts Showing Good Cause for the Board to
`Recognize Counsel Pro Hac Vice During the Proceeding
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize
`
`counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding, subject to the conditions set forth
`
`therein, and any others that the Board may impose. Petitioner sets forth
`
`these facts in support of this motion:
`
`1.
`
`The undersigned contacted counsel for patent owner Raytheon
`
`Company, Tom Filarski, who indicated that Patent Owner did not plan to
`
`oppose Mr. Zweig’s admission pro hac vice.
`
`2.
`
`Lead counsel for the proceeding, Matthew A. Smith (counsel
`
`for Sony Corporation) is a registered practitioner.
`
`3.
`
`Jacob Zweig is an experienced litigator and has established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. Accompanying
`
`this motion as Ex. 1025 is the Declaration of Jacob Zweig in Support of this
`
`Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (“Zweig Dec.”). In his declaration, Mr.
`
`Zweig attests, among other things, that he is a member in good standing of
`
`the State Bar of California. Zweig Dec. ¶ 2. Mr. Zweig further attests that
`
`he is a member in good standing of the Northern District of California, the
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01201
`
`
`
`Eastern District of Texas, and the United States Court of Appeals for the
`
`Ninth Circuit. Id. Mr. Zweig has 1 ½ years of experience in patent
`
`litigation. Id. ¶¶ 1-3. In addition, Mr. Zweig’s familiarity with the subject
`
`matter at issue in this proceeding is demonstrated by his review of the ’678
`
`patent and the cited prior art and his assistance in drafting the petition for
`
`inter partes review. Id. ¶ 8.
`
`4.
`
`In his declaration, Mr. Zweig also attests as to his admission to
`
`practice in other courts, and also to each of the required items set forth by 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c). See Zweig Dec. ¶¶ 2, 4-8.
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the
`
`Board admit Mr. Zweig pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 12, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` By: /Matthew A. Smith/
`Matthew A. Smith
`Registration No. 49,003
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01201
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing
`
`Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jacob Zweig was served
`
`on April 12, 2016 by electronic mail on the Patent Owner’s counsel:
`
`tfilarski@steptoe.com, sschlitter@steptoe.com, dstringfield@steptoe.com,
`
`and 678IPR@steptoe.com.
`
`
`
`By: /Matthew A. Smith/
`Matthew A. Smith
`Registration No. 49,003
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`4