throbber
United States Patent 1191
`Goesele et al.
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`5,024,723
`Jun. 18, 1991
`
`[54] METHOD OF PRODUCING A THIN
`SILICON 0N INSULATOR LAYER BY
`WAFER BONDING AND CHEMICAL
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`MEN-l
`' U'S' PATENT DOCU
`S
`
`t
`
`THm-NmG
`.
`7
`I
`E banks
`3
`M
`: Ulri h . Goesel , 008
`[ 6] nven ors Rd_’cDurham N21 27707_uv°lker E_
`Lehmann, Zweitorstr. 91 D406,
`vlersen 1’ Fed' Rep' of Germany
`[21] Appl. No.: 519,941
`.
`_
`May 7’ 1990
`[22] Flled'
`[51] Int. Cl.5 ................... ..'. H01L 21/306; B44C 1/22;
`C03C 15/00; CO3C 25/06
`[52] U.S. Cl. .................................. .. 156/628; 156/630;
`156/633; 156/645; 156/657; 156/662; 252/793;
`252/794; 252/795
`[58] Field of Search ............. .. 156/628, 630, 632, 633,
`156/645, 657, 662; 252/791, 79.2, 79.3, 79.4,
`79.5
`
`3,721,593 3/1973 Hays et al. . . . . . .
`. . . . . . .. 156/628
`4,601,779 7/ 1986 Abemathey .................. .. 156/630 X
`,
`,
`Primary Examiner-William A. Powell
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`A method for forming a thin crystal layer of silicon on
`top of a insulating layer that is supported by a silicon
`wafer used for electronic device applications. Carbon
`ions are implanted in a silicon wafer in order to form an
`etch stop. Said wafer is bonded to a supporting wafer
`that has an insulating surface layer of silicon oxide or
`silicon nitride. The silicon substrate of the implanted
`wafer is removed using an alkaline etching solution or
`grinding and alkaline etching. The remaining carbon
`implanted layer forms the thin silicon layer.
`
`17 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`17/ M k
`
`4/2
`
`V / //”i
`// A.
`
`\\\\\\\\\>
`
`L
`
`14 a”
`
`Raytheon2060-0001
`
`Sony Corp. v. Raytheon Co.
`IPR2015-01201
`
`

`
`I US. Patent
`
`June 18, 1991
`
`Sheet 1 of 2
`
`5,024,723
`
`/ I55
`
`J l
`
`3
`
`4
`
`T
`
`##5157
`
`'
`\\\\\\\\\\ 4
`
`l\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\
`
`Raytheon2060-0002
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`June 18, 1991
`
`Sheet 2 of 2
`
`5,024,723
`
`1
`
`/:755*
`
`5k
`
`\‘\‘C““‘C‘\“‘\\‘\\\\‘
`
`T /
`
`/5.5
`
` /
`
`/E_'7
`
`3n
`
`\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"‘.~ 4
`'{////////I/I/////////A 5
`
`. CC\‘\“.‘\\€‘\\‘\\\\\\\‘
`
`Raythe0n2060-0003
`
`Raytheon2060-0003
`
`

`
`METHOD OF PRODUCING A THIN SILICON ON
`INSULATOR LAYER BY WAFER BONDING AND
`'
`CHEMICAL THINNING
`
`10
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`4-0
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`1. Field of the Invention '
`The present invention relates to a method of forming
`a silicon-on-insulator structure.
`2. Description of the Prior Art
`The rapid development of many semiconductor de
`vices requires the use of a thin layer of silicon upon an
`insulating layer, such as silicon dioxide. For the present
`device technology a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate
`would have several advantages over bulk silicon sub
`strates. For example devices made on these substrates
`will be radiation-hard and will show no latch-up effect.
`There has been a substantial effort made to_ produce
`such SOI substrates by a variety of methods including
`silicon on sapphire, recrystallization of a thin poly sili
`con layer and implantation of a buried silicon oxide
`layer. Wafer bonding and subsequent mechanical or
`chemical thinning is a promising technique to obtain
`SOI substrates. Since ?rst reports of this technique, for
`example by J. B. Lasky, “Wafer bonding for silicon-on
`insulator technologies”, Applied Physics Letters, Vol
`ume 48, (1986) pages 78-80 there has been intensive
`effort to improve this procedure. An overview on re
`cent methods to fabricate a $01 substrate by bonding
`and thinning is given by J. Haisma, G. A. C. M. Spie
`rungs, U. K. P. Biermann and J. A. Pals in “Silicon-on
`Insulator Bonding-Wafer Thinning Technological
`Evaluations”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics,
`Volume 28, No. 8, (1989) pages 1426-1443. Many diffi
`culties have been found in the development of a satisfac
`tory bonding process. However, the problems of bub
`ble-free and homogeneous bonding at room tempera
`ture have now been virtually solved. For example U.S.
`Pat. No. 4,883,215 ?led Dec. 19, 1988, by U. M. Goesele
`and R. J. Stengl discloses and claims a method of bub
`ble-free wafer bonding in a non-cleanroom environment
`using a micro-cleanroom set-up. However, the thinning
`procedure, necessary to produce the thin semiconduc
`tor layer, still suffers from several drawbacks when
`such process is attempted by prior-art techniques.
`45
`A speci?c method for obtaining a $01 substrate using
`a bonding and thinning technique is described in U.S.
`Pat. No. 4,601,779, filed June 24, 1985, entitled
`“Method of producing a thin silicon-on-insulator
`layer”, by J. R. Abernathey, J. B. Lasky, I... A. Nesbit,
`T. O. Sedwick, and S. Stif?er. As described in this
`patent an epitaxial layer is formed on a silicon wafer
`before any implantation process is carried out. Said
`wafer is highly doped whereas the epitaxial layer has a
`low doping density. Then the wafer is implanted in
`order to create a thin buried etch-stop layer in the epi
`taxial silicon. After oxidizing this wafer it is bonded to
`a supporting silicon wafer. By grinding and using an
`acidic etch the substrate and part of the epitaxial silicon
`is removed. A second alkaline etching procedure is
`necessary to remove part of the epitaxial layer and stop
`on the implanted etch stop. The etch stop layer is re—
`moved by yet a third etching step. The remaining part
`of the epitaxial layer forms the thin silicon layer.
`A drawback of the process described by U.S. Pat.
`No. 4,601,779 is the use of a epitaxial silicon layer.
`Forming a epitaxial silicon layer is not only expensive
`and time consuming, it may also create crystal defects
`
`55
`
`65
`
`1
`
`5,024,723
`
`2
`(dislocations) in the epitaxial silicon if it is grown on a
`highly doped substrate. In addition several etching steps
`are necessary to obtain the SCI-substrate. No prior-art
`teaches the production of SCI-substrates by wafer
`bonding without using an epitaxial layer. Furthermore
`all techniques use a multiplicity of etches and etch stops
`to produce the‘ SDI-structure.
`
`OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
`It is an object of the present invention to provide an
`improved process for producing silicon-on-insulator
`(SOI) substrates.
`It is another object of the invention to provide a
`process that does not necessarily require an epitaxial
`silicon layer.
`It is another object of the invention to provide a
`process that requires only one etching step.
`It is another object of the invention to provide a
`process that requires only low concentrations of carbon
`in solid solution in the silicon substrate to form an etch
`stop instead of the high concentrations necessary to
`form a continuous silicon carbide layer as an etch stop.
`It is yet another object of the invention to provide a
`process that produces thin silicon-on-insulator layers
`with low dislocation density.
`These objects of the invention are realized in a pro
`cess of implanting carbon ions into a silicon wafer then
`bonding said wafer to a supporting wafer that is
`equipped with a thin insulating layer. After bonding, the
`substrate of the implanted wafer is removed by etching.
`The carbon implanted layer remains and thereby forms
`a silicon-on-insulator layer.
`It is another object of the invention‘ to provide a
`process that produces thicker silicon-on-insulator lay
`
`ers.
`
`_
`
`This object of the invention is realized in a process of
`implanting carbon ions into a silicon wafer, then grow
`ing an epitaxial layer of the desired thickness, then
`bonding said wafer to a supporting wafer that is
`equipped with a thin insulating layer. After bonding, the
`substrate of the implanted wafer and the carbon im
`planted layer are removed by etching. The remaining
`epitaxial layer forms a silicon-on-insulator layer.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`Other objects, features and advantages of the inven
`tion will be best understood from the following detailed
`description along with the accompanying drawings, for
`
`which
`.
`FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a silicon substrate
`having an implanted etch stop layer;
`FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the substrate of
`FIG. 1 bonded to a mechanical substrate which is
`equipped with an insulating surface layer; and
`FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the silicon-on
`insulator structure with the unimplanted region of the
`substrate of FIG. I removed.
`FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of a silicon substrate
`having an implanted etch stop layer;
`FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional ,view of a silicon substrate
`having an epitaxial layer grown on top of the implanted
`etch stop layer;
`FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of the substrate of
`FIG. 4 bonded to a mechanical substrate which is
`equipped with an insulating surface layer; and
`
`Raytheon2060-0004
`
`

`
`3
`FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of the silicon-on
`insulator structure with the unimplanted region of the
`substrate of FIG. 4 removed.
`
`15
`
`BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE
`INVENTION
`An etchstop layer is created by implanting carbon
`ions into the polished side of a silicon substrate (wafer)
`1. Using an implantation energy of 35 keV and a carbon
`dose of 1.5 X l016/cm2 the peak concentration of carbon
`in the carbon implanted layer 2 will be approximately
`l.5><l021/cm3 in a depth of 100 nm. A temperature of
`about 500° C. during implantation will lower the rate of
`implantation caused crystal damage in the substrate 1.
`Note that the boron doping density of the substrate 1
`should be below 5X lO13/cm3; this concentration is
`necessary for a substrate to be effectively etched in
`alkaline solutions such as ethylene-diamine-pyrocate
`chol (EDP), ethylene-piperidine-pyrocatechol (EEP)
`or potassium hydroxide (KOH). This implanted wafer 1
`is bonded to a mechanical support 3 that is equipped
`with an insulating layer 4 of silicon oxide or silicon
`nitride in order to form a bonded wafer pair. Good
`results were obtained using a thermal oxide of 320 nm.
`The bonding (the polished sides adjacent to each other)
`was carried out in a non-cleanroom environment using
`a micro-cleanroom setup described in said U.S. Pat. No.
`4,883,215. But any one of a number of known bonding
`techniques are applicable. The bonded wafer pair is
`annealed in order to increase the bonding strength
`(preferably below 850° C. for 30 minutes). Then the
`substrate of the implanted wafer 1 is removed by grind
`ing to a distance of approximately 30 pm or less to the
`bonded surface. By this procedure the amount of etch
`ing solution per wafer can be minimized. The remaining
`35
`part of the substrate is removed by etching in an EDP
`solution (1000 ml ethylene-diamine, 133 ml water, 160 g
`pyrocatechol) at 90° C. for approximately 1 hour. In the
`resulting thin silicon layer 2 of about 150 nm electronic
`devices may be constructed. Surprisingly, we have now
`found that the etch rate ratio between silicon and car
`bon implanted silicon in EDP is about 1:1000 for carbon
`concentrations as low as 1.5 X 1021/ cm3 (=3 atom % C
`in Si). This high etch rate ratio makes carbon a very
`effective etch stop and allows to use only one etch stop
`layer. We have discovered that for the used carbon
`concentrations (1.5X l0zl/cm3) and temperatures
`below 850° C. carbon is mainly in solid solution in sili
`con and hardly any silicon carbide precipitates are
`formed. Even more, we found that silicon carbide pre
`cipitates, that will form in an appreciable number at
`annealing temperatures greater than 850° C., will actu
`ally prevent an effective etch stop as long as the carbon
`concentration is too low to form a continuous silicon
`carbide layer.
`If the carbon concentration of the thin layer 2 is
`found to be too high for the desired application it can be
`lowered by an annealing procedure. This annealing
`should be carried out at about 1200° C. to 1300’ C. for
`30 minutes in an inert gas like argon. Based on the avail
`able information on the microstructure of carbon
`implanted silicon layers up to a dose of 2X l0‘6/cm2 it
`can be expected that the carbon-implanted layer has a
`very low dislocation density, which is favorable for S01
`device applications.
`65
`If a silicon-on-insulator layer thicker than about 1000
`nm is required for speci?c device applications the car
`bon implantation dose has to be about 1X l017/cm2 and
`
`5,024,723
`4
`the energy about 450 keV. These high doses and high
`energies make the implantation process time consuming
`and expensive. In this special case the formation of a
`epitaxial silicon layer 5 on the silicon substrate 1 after a
`low energy (35 kev) low dose (l.5>< l0l6/cm2) carbon
`implantation (implanted layer 2) is a sufficient way for
`producing such layers more effectively. All subsequent
`steps like bonding, thinning and annealing are the same
`as described for the case with no epitaxial layer. The
`implanted carbon rich etchstop layer can be removed
`by etching in solution consisting of hydro?uoric acid,
`nitric acid and acetic acid or by thermal oxidation and
`subsequent etching in hydro?uoric acid.
`We claim:
`1. A method of forming a thin silicon layer upon
`which semiconductor devices can subsequently be
`formed, comprising the steps of:
`implanting carbon ions into a silicon substrate, to
`form an implanted layer;
`bonding said silicon substrate to a mechanical sup
`port, to form a bonded wafer pair, such that the
`said implanted layer is adjacent said mechanical
`support;
`annealing of said bonded wafer pair at such low tem
`peratures that carbon remains in solid solution in
`silicon and no buried layer of silicon carbide is
`formed;
`removing said silicon substrate without removing the
`implanted layer;
`whereby said underlaying implanted layer remain on
`said mechanical support to form the thin silicon
`layer.
`2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein said step
`of bonding said silicon substrate is carried out in a mi
`cro-cleanroom set-up.
`'
`3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein said
`silicon substrate and said mechanical support are an
`nealed at approximately 850° C. after bonding.
`4.'The method as recited in claim 1, wherein said
`mechanical support is made of silicon and is oxidized
`prior to bonding.
`5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein said step
`of removing the silicon substrate comprises the steps of:
`mechanically removing a portion of said silicon sub
`strate;
`etching the remaining part of said silicon substrate
`with an etchant that does not appreciably attack
`said implanted layer.
`6. The method as recited in claim 5, wherein said
`etchant comprises a solution selected from the group
`consisting of ethylene-diamine-pyrocatecol, ethelene
`piperidine-pyrocatechol, and potassium hydroxide.
`7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein said
`carbon ions are implanted at doses and energies that will
`produce a maximum carbon concentration of about
`1.5x l021/cm3 in said silicon substrate.
`8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein said thin
`silicon layerlayer is subsequently annealed at a temper
`ature in the range of 900° C. to l300° C.
`9. A method of forming a thin silicon layer upon
`which semiconductor devices can subsequently be
`formed, comprising the steps of:
`implanting carbon ions into a silicon substrate, to
`form an implanted layer;
`growing of an epitaxial silicon layer on said silicon
`substrate;
`bonding said silicon substrate to a mechanical sup
`port, to form a bonded wafer pair, such that the
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`Raytheon2060-0005
`
`

`
`5
`said epitaxial layer is adjacent said mechanical
`Support;
`annealing of the bonded wafers at such low tempera
`tures that carbon remains in solid solution in silicon
`and no buried layer of silicon carbide is formed;
`removing said silicon substrate without removing the
`implanted layer;
`removing said carbon implanted layer without re
`moving the epitaxial layer;
`whereby said underlaying epitaxial layer remains on
`said mechanical support to form a thin silicon
`layer.
`-
`10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein said
`step of bonding said silicon substrate is carried out in a
`micro-cleanroom set-up.
`11. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein said
`silicon substrate and said mechanical support are an
`nealed at approximately 850° C. after bonding.
`12. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein said
`mechanical support is made of silicon and is oxidized
`prior to bonding.
`
`15
`
`20
`
`5,024,723
`6
`13. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein said
`step of removing the silicon substrate comprises the
`steps of:
`mechanically removing a portion of said silicon sub
`strate;
`etching the remaining part of said silicon substrate
`with an etchant that does not appreciably attack
`said implanted layer.
`‘
`14. The method as recited in claim 13, wherein said
`etchant comprises a solution selected from the group
`consisting of ethelene-diamine-pyrocatecol, ethelene
`piperidine-pyrocatechol, and potassium hydroxide.
`15. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein said
`carbon ions are implanted at doses and energies that will
`produce a maximum carbon concentration of abou
`l.5XlO21/cm3 in said silicon substrate.
`‘v
`16. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein said
`carbon implanted layer is removed by an etchant con
`sisting of hydro?uoric acid, nitric acid and acetic acid.
`17. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein said
`carbon implanted layer is removed by oxidizing the
`carbon implanted layer at a temperature in the range of
`900° C. to 1300° C. and subsequent etching in hydro?u
`oric acid.
`.
`
`it
`
`‘I
`
`it
`
`t It
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Raytheon2060-0006

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket