`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Attachments:
`
`Hails, Robert L. <rhails@bakerlaw.com>
`Wednesday, February 17, 2016 5:14 PM
`Fryer, Jennifer; melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com; aharoon@kenyon.com;
`jhutchins@kenyon.com; Apple-Raytheon@kenyon.com; jyoon@wsgr.com;
`ashih@wsgr.com; aburrowbridge@wsgr.com; Ramos, Antonio (ARamos@wsgr.com);
`WSGR - OmniVision/Raytheon; davisma@gtlaw.com; shahidas@gtlaw.com;
`kimmin@gtlaw.com; mccarthyp@gtlaw.com; pabisr@gtlaw.com; edlinr@gtlaw.com;
`spharc@gtlaw.com; ddacus@dacusfirm.com; Walker, T. Cy; zbillah@kenyon.com; Sony-
`Raytheon@kenyon.com
`Steptoe Raytheon 678 Litigation; Bo Davis (bdavis@bdavisfirm.com); Sue Mellinger
`RE: Raytheon v. Samsung, et al., Lead Case No. 2:15-cv-00341-JRG-RSP
`Joint Claim Construction Chart_Appx A (updated) w_ Sony revisions.DOCX
`
`Counsel:
`
`Thanks for sending. Here are Sony’s revisions to the Appendix.
`
`Sony proposes to list “etching” as an agreed term using Raytheon’s alternate construction – removing material
`with an etchant. I believe all Defendants agree to this but I would ask them to confirm. Please let me know if
`this is acceptable.
`
`Regards,
`
`Bob
`
`
`Robert Hails | BakerHostetler
`Washington Square | 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1100 | Washington, D.C. 20036-5304
`T 202.861.1692 | F 202.861.1783
`rhails@bakerlaw.com
`
`
`
`From: Fryer, Jennifer [mailto:jfryer@steptoe.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 5:33 PM
`To: melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com; aharoon@kenyon.com; jhutchins@kenyon.com; Apple-Raytheon@kenyon.com;
`jyoon@wsgr.com; ashih@wsgr.com; aburrowbridge@wsgr.com; Ramos, Antonio (ARamos@wsgr.com); WSGR -
`OmniVision/Raytheon; davisma@gtlaw.com; shahidas@gtlaw.com; kimmin@gtlaw.com; mccarthyp@gtlaw.com;
`pabisr@gtlaw.com; edlinr@gtlaw.com; spharc@gtlaw.com; ddacus@dacusfirm.com; Walker, T. Cy; zbillah@kenyon.com;
`Hails, Robert L.; Sony-Raytheon@kenyon.com
`Cc: Steptoe Raytheon 678 Litigation; Bo Davis (bdavis@bdavisfirm.com); Sue Mellinger
`Subject: RE: Raytheon v. Samsung, et al., Lead Case No. 2:15-cv-00341-JRG-RSP
`
`In light of Defendants’ suggestions we believe this new form is cleaner and easier to read. Please let us know if
`you have any objections.
`
`Jenn Fryer
`IP Paralegal Specialist
`312-577-1305
`
`From: Fryer, Jennifer
`Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 9:53 AM
`
`1
`
`Raytheon2039-0001
`
`Sony Corp. v. Raytheon Co.
`IPR2015-01201
`
`
`
`To: 'melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com'; 'aharoon@kenyon.com'; 'jhutchins@kenyon.com'; 'Apple-Raytheon@kenyon.com';
`'jyoon@wsgr.com'; 'ashih@wsgr.com'; 'aburrowbridge@wsgr.com'; Ramos, Antonio (ARamos@wsgr.com); WSGR -
`OmniVision/Raytheon; 'davisma@gtlaw.com'; 'shahidas@gtlaw.com'; 'kimmin@gtlaw.com'; 'mccarthyp@gtlaw.com';
`'pabisr@gtlaw.com'; 'edlinr@gtlaw.com'; spharc@gtlaw.com; 'ddacus@dacusfirm.com'; 'cwalker@bakerlaw.com';
`'zbillah@kenyon.com'; 'rhails@bakerlaw.com'; 'Sony-Raytheon@kenyon.com'
`Cc: Steptoe Raytheon 678 Litigation; Bo Davis (bdavis@bdavisfirm.com); Sue Mellinger
`Subject: Raytheon v. Samsung, et al., Lead Case No. 2:15-cv-00341-JRG-RSP
`
`Please see attached.
`
`Jennifer K. Fryer
`IP Paralegal Specialist
`JFryer@steptoe.com
`
`Steptoe & Johnson LLP
`115 South LaSalle Street
`Suite 3100
`Chicago, IL 60603
`www.steptoe.com
`
`
`Steptoe
`
`
`+1 312 577 1305 direct
`+1 312 577 1370 fax
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`This email is intended only for the use of the party to which it is
`addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
`confidential, or protected by law. If you are not the intended
`recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying
`or distribution of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited.
`If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately
`by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
`
`Any tax advice in this email is for information purposes only. The content
`of this email is limited to the matters specifically addressed herein
`and may not contain a full description of all relevant facts or a
`complete analysis of all relevant issues or authorities.
`
`Internet communications are not assured to be secure or clear of
`inaccuracies as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
`destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore,
`we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are
`present in this email, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result
`of e-mail transmission.
`
`Raytheon2039-0002
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
