throbber
Infrared‐absorption spectroscopy of Si(100) and Si(111) surfaces after
`chemomechanical polishing
`G. J. Pietsch, Y. J. Chabal, and G. S. Higashi
`
`Citation: Journal of Applied Physics 78, 1650 (1995); doi: 10.1063/1.360721
`View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.360721
`View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jap/78/3?ver=pdfcov
`Published by the AIP Publishing
`
`Articles you may be interested in
`Interaction of hydrogen-terminated Si(100), (110), and (111) surfaces with hydrogen plasma investigated
`by in situ real-time infrared absorption spectroscopy
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 21, 25 (2003); 10.1116/1.1524146
`
`Characterization of SiC whiskers through infrared‐absorption spectroscopy
`J. Appl. Phys. 73, 8506 (1993); 10.1063/1.353403
`
`Infrared spectroscopy of Si(111) and Si(100) surfaces after HF treatment: Hydrogen termination and
`surface morphology
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7, 2104 (1989); 10.1116/1.575980
`
`The surface state of Si (100) and (111) wafers after treatment with hydrofluoric acid
`AIP Conf. Proc. 167, 329 (1988); 10.1063/1.37163
`
`Infrared spectroscopy of Si(111) surfaces after HF treatment: Hydrogen termination and surface
`morphology
`Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 998 (1988); 10.1063/1.100053
`
`
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. IP: 104.129.194.129 On: Tue, 01 Mar 2016
`23:12:15
`
`Raytheon2033-0001
`
`Sony Corp. v. Raytheon Co.
`IPR2015-01201
`
`

`
`) surfaces
`
`of Si(1 00) and Si(lll
`
`spectroscopy
`Infrared-absorption
`after che~omechanical
`polishing
`G. J. Pietsch,‘) Y. J. ChabaLb) and G. S. Higashi@
`AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
`(Received 3 February 1995; accepted for publication 13 April 1995)
`is studied by
`(CMP)
`The mechanism of silicon stock removal
`in chemomechanical polishing
`characterizing
`surface chemical
`species with
`infrared-absorption measurements and
`the
`corresponding degree of hydrophobic@ with contact angle measurements immediately after CMP.
`Surface properties and stock removal rates are found to depend strongly on the pH of the silica
`slurry used in this “syton polishing”
`technique. At the peak of the removal rate [pH-11
`for both
`Si(100) and Si(1 ll)],
`the surfaces have the highest hydrophobicity and the highest hydrogen
`coverage. Si(ll1) has an ideal monohydride termination, while Si(100) is characterized by a variety
`of hydrides
`(mono-, di-, and trihydrides), suggesting different morphologies
`for
`the surfaces:
`atomically
`flat domains on Si( 111) and rougher areas on Si( 100). Away from the optimum slurry pH
`(at lower stock removal rates), a higher concentration of hydroxyl groups is observed, increasing the
`surface hydrophilicity. At all pH, some oxidation occurs beneath the H-terminated Si surface, as
`evidenced by a characteristic frequency shift of oxygen-backbonded hydrides. The mechanisms of
`stock removal are considered in view of these observations for the different ranges of slurry pH. In
`particular, at the highest removal rates, an interplay of surface oxidation,
`removal of oxidized
`silicon, and subsequent H termination
`is suggested. Based on the spectroscopic characterization of
`surface morphologies,
`the relevance of CMP to prepare atomically smooth silicon surfaces is
`Institute of Physics.
`discussed. 0
`I995 American
`
`1. INTRODUCTION
`Since
`the
`late 196Os, chemomechanical polishing*
`(CMP) has been used to prepare smooth, defect-free starting
`surfaces for the patterning of microelectronic devices.’ CMP
`uses an alkaline suspension of colloidal silica (“syton”) and
`combines a mechanical grinding action with a chemical etch-
`ing action. It is the last and, thus, most critical step in a series
`of surface-shaping processes3 (slice cutting from the crystal
`ingot; grinding/lapping; wet-chemical etching
`for
`the re-
`moval of the surface layers damaged by the preceding me
`chanically abrasive steps) designed to obtain
`the surface
`smoothness and integrity required by the state-of-the-art pat-
`terning technologies;4 CMP is also the surface planarization
`process of choice to produce the extremely
`low local and
`total
`thickness variations
`that the new
`low-depth-of-field
`photolithography
`techniques demand; CMP yields surface
`morphologies appropriate for further deposition of thin “ac-
`tive” epitaxial
`layers; finally, CMP is used to prepare thin-
`film Si devices
`for silicon-on-insulator
`(SOI) structures5
`formed by wafer direct bonding. In all these important appli-
`cations chemomechanical polishing
`is a precise, well-
`controllable, and cost-effective
`technology to create silicon
`surfaces with superior flatness (see upper portion of Fig. 1)
`and specific properties required by technology.
`Most recently, CMP has become even more important as
`a method to remove excess interlevel dielectric SiO, over the
`connection studs
`in very
`large scale integrated
`(VLSI)
`
`%resent address: FB Physik, Philipps-Uaiversit%t Marburg, 35032 Marburg,
`Germany.
`b)Electronic mail: yves@physics.att.com
`‘)Present address: AT&T Microelectronics, 9333 South John Young Park-
`way, Orlando, FL 32819.
`
`interlayer
`multilayer chips after device patterning to allow
`connection and to produce a planar surface for the next level
`of wiring6 (see lower portion of Fig. 1). Here, CMP forms a
`low-cost and low-damage alternative to plasma etch-backs
`with an even better resulting surface planarity. In this post-
`patterning application, silicon dioxide is removed during pol-
`ishing (lower portion of Fig. l), in contrast to the prepattern-
`ing applications listed above where silicon is removed (see
`upper portion of Fig. 1). In the future, it is expected that
`CMP will become even more
`important, with shrinking
`device dimensions and demands for defect-free, ultrathin
`(-50 A) gate oxides.
`the
`Technology has motivated extensive studies of
`chemomechanical polishing process. Properties such as stock
`removal
`rate, macroscopic
`removal homogeneity, and
`selectivityZV7 have been studied in great detail. However, it is
`becoming more urgent to understand the microscopic
`re-
`moval mechanisms and surface processes as the device prop-
`erties begin to depend on the atomic scale properties (rough-
`ness, etc.). The molecular origin of the observed hydro-
`phobicity of silicon surfaces immediately after CMP, for in-
`stance, has only recently been addressed. Schnegg et al. have
`suggested that the hydrophobicity was predominantly due to
`hydrogen surface termination.879 Such a hypothesis has just
`been verified for the case of Si(ll1) surfaces’0 and there is a
`clear need to generalize the study to the technologically more
`important Si(100) surfaces.
`In this article we use infrared (IR) absorption spectros-
`copy, in addition
`to stock removal rates and contact angle
`measurements,
`to study
`the surface properties of both
`Si(100) and Si(ll1)
`after chemomechanical polishing. This
`work is an extension of the more limited study on Si(ll1)
`surfaces,” and attempts to uncover
`the chemical etching
`
`1650
`
`J. Appl. Phys. 78 (3), 1 August 1995
`
`0021-8979/95/76(3)11650l9/$6.00
`
`Q 1995 American Institute of Physics
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. IP: 104.129.194.129 On: Tue, 01 Mar 2016
`23:12:15
`
`Raytheon2033-0002
`
`

`
`surf. level
`after CMP
`
`f
`
`I
`
`1
`
`after CMP
`and metalit.
`
`FIG. 1. Schematics of various applications of chemomechanical polishing:
`(top) silicon surface planarization prior to device patterning; (bottom) re-
`moval of interlevel silicon dioxide for interlayer connection and planariza-
`tion of the oxide surface for the next layer of wiring.
`
`the concentra-
`
`mechanisms relevant to CMP by monitoring
`tion of various species at the surface.
`Infrared spectroscopy is particularly well suited to detect
`surface species such as Si-H, Si-O-H, and water,” expected
`as a result of colloidal silica polishing chemistry. Using a
`multiple
`internal reflection (MIR) geometry,‘” good sensitiv-
`ity can be achieved for vibrational modes higher than 1450
`this optical technique does not require
`cm-‘. Furthermore,
`introduction
`into a vacuum chamber as does electron energy
`loss spectroscopy,‘3”4 making
`it much more convenient
`to
`investigate
`the silicon surfaces immediately after CMP. In
`Sec. II we describe
`the experimental configuration and
`sample preparation.
`In Sec. III we summarize
`the depen-
`dence of the stock removal rate and contact angle (degree of
`hydrophobicity) on the solution pH.
`In the discussion (Sec.
`IV), we relate the observations to atomic processes at sur-
`faces and propose microscopic models for the various sur-
`face reactions taking place in CMP.
`
`II. EXPERIMENT
`for chemomechanical polishing experi-
`The samples
`ments are prepared from n-type Si(ll1)
`and Si(100) wafers
`with a moderate resistivity
`(p-150 Q cm) and a well-
`oriented cut bolar angle of cut A@, versus (111) and (100) is
`IAq<O.Ol”]
`to provide a low initial step density. Rectangular
`plates (38X 15X0.45 mm3) are cut and their short end bev-
`eled at 45” to let the IR radiation in and out (see bottom part
`
`pressure
`
`45”-beveled
`Si samje
`
`slurry feed
`hing
`pad
`
`/otating
`polishing plate
`
`v
`
`&-beveled sample
`
`the rectangular, beveled
`FIG. 2. (Top) experimental setup for polishing
`samples used for
`the IR measurements: The vacuum chuck holds the
`samples that are moved back and forth over the rotating polishing pad,
`(bottom) schematic of the beveled sample showing the IR beam path (with
`multiple internal reflections) and definitions of the polarizations (s polariza-
`tion is strictly parallel to the surface).
`
`of Fig. 2). Once in the plate, the IR beam is totally internally
`reflected, with a total of -75
`reflections
`{both sides are
`probed). This
`internal
`reflection geometry gives
`roughly
`equal sensitivity
`to all components of the measured surface
`(E, , E, , and E, are equal to within 10%). The
`absorption”
`sharp edges formed by the 45” bevels are slightly rounded to
`avoid scratching of the polished surface by chipped-off sili-
`con during polishing. The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
`spectrometer is a Nicolet 6OSX, operated with a 1 cm-’
`reso-
`lution and equipped with a Nx-purged
`load
`lock and a
`N,-cooled
`InSb detector.
`Prior
`to polishing
`the samples are thoroughly cleaned
`using repeated cycles of chemical oxidation,
`the RCA-SC1
`standard clean producing hydrophilic surfaces’6V’7 (10 min in
`NH40H:H,0,:Hz0=1:1:5
`at 80 “C), and a HF dip in dilute
`HF, resulting
`in hydrophobic surfaces.17 This alternating
`growth17 and removal of a thin hydrophilic wet-chemical ox-
`ide results
`in hydrocarbon-, metal-, and particle-free sur-
`faces.17-19 The process ends with a chemical oxidation, leav-
`ing a thin oxide layer on the surface prior to chemomechani-
`cal polishing.
`The solution used for chemomechanical polishing con-
`sists of dilute suspension of colloidal silica (10% syton)2*4
`(*pH-
`11). Potassium hydroxide (KOH) and/or phosphoric
`acid (H,PO,) can be added to adjust the pH.
`For
`the chemomechanical polishing,
`the samples are
`held at their circumference by a Teflon gasket on a small
`vacuum chuck. This arrangement makes it possible to polish
`both surfaces, with a fast turnover and minimum contamina-
`tion of the side just polished (see upper portion of Fig. 2).
`The vacuum chuck can pivot freely about a tip which pro-
`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 78, No. 3, 1 August 1995
`
`Pietsch, Chabal, and Higashi
`
`1651
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. IP: 104.129.194.129 On: Tue, 01 Mar 2016
`23:12:15
`
`Raytheon2033-0003
`
`

`
`Si(lil):-
`Si(iOO):---
`
`g100
`-iz
`
`=
`v
`2
`
`80
`
`60
`
`oL.“‘a’a”‘*‘*“’
`0
`2
`4
`6
`8
`IO 12 14 16
`POLISHING SLURRY pH
`
`FIG. 3. Stock removal rate during chemomechanical polishing as a function
`of slung pH: The open circles and solid squares are for the Si(100) and
`Si( 111) surfaces, respectively.
`
`absolute oxygen concentration on Si(lOO), for instance, has
`been established, varying from -70”
`for no detectable sur-
`face oxygen to -25”
`for 4 at. %.‘O In our experiments, the
`contact angles measured immediately after chemomechanical
`polishing show a dependence on the polishing slurry pH that
`strongly resembles that of the stock removal rate (Fig. 3)
`both for Si(100) and Si( 111). It peaks at pH-I 1 and drops
`for acid and highly alkaline pH values.
`The magnitude of the effects is reversed between Si( 111)
`and Si(100). While the highest removal rates are observed
`for Si(lOO), the highest degree of hydrophobicity is recorded
`for Si(lll).
`The contact angle dependence on pH
`is much
`less pronounced for Si(100) samples (30”-55”)
`than for
`Si(ll1) samples (30”-70”). The most extreme contact angles
`achievable by wet-chemical means, i.e., those of the most
`
`. I - I - I . *N&l
`
`. I * I
`
`90”
`5 80”
`
`
`
`
`
`g :;;I :y;;y* , , RCA;-SC,B ,I .
`
`
`
`vides an adjustable polishing pressure (-lo4 Pa was used for
`compatibility with commercial polishing procedures”*4). Dur-
`ing polishing the tip moves the chuck with the sample peri-
`odically back and forth over the rotating polishing plate car-
`rying
`the polishing pad, thus providing a uniform stock
`removal of the sample. The resilient, poromeric polishing
`pad made from black polyurethane velours (pad size -100
`cm”) rotates about three times a second resulting in a polish-
`ing speed -100 cm/s. The polishing slurry is fed constantly
`via a wick onto the rotating pad at a rate of about 0.2 ml/s,
`providing a thin homogeneous film between the pad and the
`sample surface without allowing the slurry to wet-and
`thus
`corrode-the
`optically smooth beveled faces. Each side of
`the sample is polished for -5 min and subsequently repol-
`ished for an additional <l min to limit
`the risk of contami-
`nation of the polished surfaces by exposure to the ambient
`during the polish of the other side. Within a few minutes
`after polishing, the samples are inserted into the HZ-purged
`loadlock and transferred to the IR bench; the IR beam is
`adjusted and focused onto the beveled edges in a couple of
`minutes and data are then collected.
`The IR spectra obtained on polished samples are ratioed
`to spectra of either RCA-treated (oxidized samples) to study
`the Si-H stretch
`region, or NH&etched
`samples (H-
`terminated surfaces) to study the hydrocarbon and hydroxyl
`regions. These reference spectra are taken immediately be-
`fore or after the spectra of polished wafers so as to eliminate
`bulk absorption and to limit artifacts in the spectra base line.
`Since measurements in the O-H stretch absorption area (V
`=3000-4000 cm-‘) are very sensitive to residual water ad-
`sorbed on the windows, mirror surfaces, and detector, as well
`as the homogeneity of N, purge, the reference sample is
`mounted together on the same sample holder so that the IR
`beam can probe alternatively
`the chemomechanically pol-
`ished and reference samples by a rapid, remotely controlled
`translation.
`
`III. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION
`A. Removal
`rate and degree of hydrophobicity
`While the polishing speed, pressure, and syton concen-
`tration are important parameters for the mechanical polish-
`ing, the pH of the polishing slurry is the most important
`parameter for
`the chemical polishing. Figure 3 shows the
`strong dependence on the slurry pH of the resulting stock
`removal rate during CMP for both Si(111) and Si(100). The
`main observation is the peak in removal rate at pH- 11 for
`both Si(100) and Si(lll), with a sharp drop at higher pH. At
`lower pH,
`the rate drops but displays a small increase for
`slightly acid slurry pH @H-4). Another important observa-
`tion is the consistently higher removal rates on Si( loo), par-
`ticularly at the peaks of the curves.
`Figure 4 shows the results of contact angle measure-
`ments (using 5 ,~l water droplets) of chemomechanically pol-
`ished Si(ll1) and Si( 100). Contact angle measurements” are
`an indirect probe of surface oxygen with submonolayer sen-
`sitivity, which has been calibrated by x-ray photoelectron
`spectroscopy (XI’S) measurements carried out on the same
`surfaces.20 A linear dependence of the contact angle on the
`
`0
`
`10 12 14
`8
`6
`4
`2
`POLISHING SLURRY ,uH
`
`FIG. 4. Surface contact angles (obtained with a 5 ~1 water droplet) for
`chemomechanically polished Si(lll)
`(solid circles) and Si(100) (open
`circles) as a function of polishing slurry pH. The reference points are the
`most hydrophobic Si(ll1) surface (solid square labeled NH4F to reflect the
`preparation conditions), an intermediate surface obtained by HF etching of
`Si(100) (labeled cont. HF), and the most hydrophilic surfaces [solid and
`open squares for Si( 111) and Si(lOO), respectively, labeled RCA-SCl].
`
`1652
`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 78, No. 3, 1 August 1995
`
`Pietsch, Chabal, and Higashi
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. IP: 104.129.194.129 On: Tue, 01 Mar 2016
`23:12:15
`
`Raytheon2033-0004
`
`

`
`hydrogen-
`[“ideally”
`surface preparable
`hydrophobic
`terminated Si(ll1)
`surface obtained after etching with 40%
`NH,F solution,“r labeled NHJF] and those of the most hy-
`drophilic surfaces (after wet-chemical growth of an ultrathin
`hydrophilic
`oxide by
`the RCA-SC1 Hz02:NH,0H:Hz0
`process, l6 labeled RCA-SCl) are given as a reference. The
`measured contact angles obtained after CMP are always well
`within
`these values, indicating
`that the surfaces are never
`completely H terminated nor oxidized at any given pH dur-
`ing the CMP process.
`
`B. Infrared-absorption data
`1. Hydrogen termination
`Figure 5 shows infrared-absorption spectra of chemome-
`chanically polished Si(ll1)
`(upper portion of Fig. 5) and
`Si(100)
`(lower portion)
`in the range of
`the Si-H stretch
`vibrations”“5”8.22-24 (2000-2200 cm-‘). The spectra of
`both Si(ll1) and Si(lO0) are characterized by a strong ab-
`sorption band around 2100 cm-‘,
`indicating that a substan-
`tial part of the surface is covered with hydrogen after chemo-
`mechanical polishing @H-11). Similar spectra taken for
`different slurry pH confirm
`that the highest H coverage is
`correlated with the highest hydrophobicity, The shape of the
`absorption bands is different on Si(ll1) and Si(lOO), as de-
`scribed below.
`The most prominent feature on Si( 111) immediately after
`CMP at pH- 11 is a single sharp absorption
`line at
`v-2082.4 cm-*
`(upper portion of Fig. 5), strictly polarized
`perpendicular to the surface.” This is the spectral signature
`(polarization and frequency) of
`ideally monohydride-ter-
`minated Si(111),21*B obtained,
`for
`instance, by etching
`Si(ll1)
`in a 40% ammonium
`fluoride solution. While
`the
`CMP and NH,F-etched surfaces have a similar spectrum,
`important differences exist, as shown in the center portion of
`Fig. 5: The surface etched in ammonium fluoride has a mode
`at 2083.8 cm-’
`instead of 2082.4 cm-‘, a 1.1 cm-’
`linewidth
`instead of 2.1 cm-‘, and twice the integrated area. The lower
`intensity of the StH mode on the CMP surface indicates that
`the hydrogen coverage is roughly half of a monolayer.
`Changes in effective surface dielectric constant (due to the
`presence of other species such as OH) cannot account for the
`different intensity ratio. The broader mode with a 1.4 cm-’
`downshift is consistent with the presence of small H/Si(ll
`l)-
`(1X 1) domains. In the absence of chemical shifts arising
`from neighboring impurities such as OH, the average size of
`such domains is estimated at 8 StH units.2”-28 This estimate
`would change if part of the shift arises from chemical shift
`and cannot therefore be taken as an accurate measure. The
`qualitative picture of small, predominantly 1 monohydride-
`terminated Si(ll1) domains separated by steps is coafirmed
`by the observation of a “defect mode” at v=2072 cm-’
`(arrow in upper portion of Fig. 5), assigned to the asymmet-
`ric stretch vibration of coupled monohydrides associated
`with a step along the (0 11) direction. This corresponds to the
`predominant step type expected on Si(ll1)
`(miscuttoward
`[~1~])~W9”0
`The Si(100) surface after CMP exhibits a much broader
`spectrum (bottom of Fig. 5) which cannot be assigned in as
`
`2000
`
`2050
`
`2100
`
`2150
`
`2200
`
`FIG. 5. IR-absorption spectra (silicon hydrogen stretch region) of chemo-
`mechanically polished Si(ll1)
`(top, slurry pH= 12.5) and Si(100) (bottom,
`slurry pH=12),
`referenced to RCA-cleaned surfaces. The center panel
`shows the spectrum of the same Si(ll1) surface as in the top panel, but
`etched instead in a 40% solution of ammonium fluoride.
`
`much detail. The featureless absorption ranges from 2050 to
`2150 cm-* . This region encompasses the frequencies of vari-
`ous monohydride structures (2070-2090 cm-‘), dihydride
`structures (2090-2120 cm-‘), and the modes of the trihy-
`dride (2120-2150 cm-‘). These assignments are based on
`exhaustive studies, including
`isotopic mixture experiments,
`of h-etched
`silicon surfaces and ab
`cluster cal-
`initio
`culations.2’*223*-34 Since the spectrum peaks at -2110 cm-‘,
`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 78, No. 3, 1 August 1995
`
`Pietsch, Chabal, and Higashi
`
`1653
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. IP: 104.129.194.129 On: Tue, 01 Mar 2016
`23:12:15
`
`Raytheon2033-0005
`
`

`
`‘
`
`we conclude that the Si(100) surface is predominantly cov-
`ered by dihydrides. The surface, however,
`is atomically
`rough as evidenced by the presence of other hydrides and the
`lack of a strong polarization dependence. Comparison to the
`broad spectrum measured on the atomically rough HF-etched
`Si( 1 11),33 which has the same overall width but peaks around
`2085 cm-‘, highlights the ability of IR spectra to differenti-
`ate a predominant monohydride
`from a predominant dihy-
`dride termination on rough surfaces.
`Although the Si(100) spectrum is broad, we can rule out
`the predominance of an ideally dihydride-terminated
`flat
`Si(100). Such dihydride
`termination has been observed in
`UHV
`to coexist with monohydride
`to
`form a 3X 1
`periodicity.35 The dihydride modes are at 2091 and 2103
`cm-’
`for the symmetric and asymmetric stretch, respectively,
`with a strong polarization dependence:“’ The symmetric
`stretch is perpendicular to the surface and the asymmetric
`stretch parallel to the surface. The peak position and polar-
`ization dependence of the spectrum at the bottom of Fig. 5
`are inconsistent with such structure. On HF-etched Si(100)
`[i.e., atomically rough, H-terminated Si(100) surfaces], the
`position of the dihydride symmetric/asymmetric modes has
`been recorded at 210412115 cm-’
`for one type of dihydride
`and at 2108/2121 cm-’
`for another.32 These peak positions
`are much more consistent with the CMP data. Finally, the
`overall
`intensity of the broad absorption band is stronger
`than expected for an atomically smooth surface,31 providing
`further support for an atomically rough surface. The overall
`strength, however, is lower than that measured on the micro-
`scopically rough HF-etched Si( 100),22,33 suggesting that the
`surface is not completely terminated by hydrogen.
`
`2. Other species
`In this subsection we concentrate on the chemical spe-
`cies that make up the rest of the imperfectly H-terminated
`CMP Si surfaces. Figure 6 shows the full range of the spectra
`from 2000 to 4000 cm-’
`for Si(100) after CMP, obtained by
`using
`the spectrum of
`the NH4F-etched,
`ideally mono-
`hydride-terminated Si(ll1) as a reference. This reference sur-
`face is chosen because its spectrum is remarkably simple
`(strong band at 2083.8 cm-’ polarized perpendicular to the
`surface). In particular, the hydrocarbon and hydroxyl con-
`tamination is negligible on this surface. By switching quickly
`between this reference sample and the CMP sample, contri-
`butions from mirrors and windows are effectively eliminated.
`Using this reference, a sharp “negative” absorption peak at
`2083.8 cm-’
`(labeled A) appears in all CMP spectra taken
`with p polarization. The spectra associated with Si(100) are
`shown in the main figure, while those of the Si(ll1)
`are
`shown as insets. The upper figure portion summarizes the IR
`spectra of Si(ll1) and Si(100) polished at the optimum pol-
`ishing slurry pH of -11 while the lower figure portion sum-
`marizes the spectra obtained at _pH values where significantly
`lower polishing removal rate and more hydrophilic surfaces
`are obtained.
`first,
`Several absorption features can be distinguished:
`the features labeled B, a broad absorption centered around
`2110 cm-’
`for Si(100) and a sharp absorption at 2082.5
`cm-’
`for Si(ll1). These are assigned to the predominance of
`
`1654
`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 78, No. 3, 1 August 1995
`
`qii$ijG$ijr
`
`s-pol
`
`LWoo
`2000
`
`2200
`WAVENUMBER
`
`[cm-‘]
`
`2
`
`0
`
`WAVENUMBER
`
`[cm-l]
`
`FIG. 6. IR-absorption spectra of chemomechanically polished Si(100) (main
`figures) and Si(ll1)
`(insets), referenced to Si(ll1) surfaces etched in a 40%
`solution of NH.,F. The sharp “negative” feature, labeled A, corresponds to
`the Si-H stretch absorption of this reference surface. The features labeled B
`and C correspond to SiH, vibration and O,SiH,
`(oxygen backbonded hy-
`drides), respectively. The dashed arrows around label C in the insets point to
`different types of oxygen backbonded hydrides. D and E correspond to the
`fingerprint regions of hydrocarbons and hydroxyls, respectively.
`
`dihydride termination on the Si(100) and to ideal monohy-
`dride termination on Si(lll)
`as discussed above. Second,
`there is a weak absorption, labeled C at -2250 cm-’ with
`contributions
`in both s and p polarizations for Si(100) and
`predominantly in p polarization for Si(ll1). Next, the region
`labeled D corresponds to the hydrocarbon absorption. The
`negative peaks indicate that slightly more hydrocarbons have
`adsorbed on the reference surface than on the sample surface
`during
`transport. Finally,
`the broad feature labeled E at
`-3100 cm-’
`is indicative of hydroxyl termination or possi-
`bly water adsorption. This region has already been discussed
`for the Si(ll1)
`surface,” so that it is not presented here.
`
`Pietsch, Chabal, and Higashi
`
`e
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. IP: 104.129.194.129 On: Tue, 01 Mar 2016
`23:12:15
`
`Raytheon2033-0006
`
`

`
`Since the presence of hydrocarbon contamination’3 (fea-
`ture D) may have important implications
`for processing, we
`review our measurement method here. By ratioing the spec-
`tra
`to
`the spectrum of
`the
`ideally monohydride-ter-
`minated Si(lll),
`the large contribution
`from hydrocarbons
`adsorbed on mirrors, windows, and detector is made negli-
`gible. However, the reference surface itself does adsorb hy-
`drocarbons after processing, as evidenced by the “negative”
`absorption peaks. We therefore cannot obtain an absolute
`measure of hydrocarbon contamination but a relative one to
`compare different CMP conditions. The expected features
`due to CH, in this IR region are the asymmetric “methyl”
`stretch mode, -CtiH3,
`at 2970 cm-‘,
`indicating
`the pres-
`ence of CH,, and the CH,-related modes at 2930 cm-’ and
`2855 cm-”
`(asymmetric, -CFtH2, and symmetric, -C=tH2,
`“ethylene” stretch, respectively). Thus, it is evident that both
`CHs and CH, groups are present. The main conclusion, how-
`ever, is that the overall hydrocarbon contamination is mini-
`mal, as evidenced by the fact that these features are some-
`times positive, sometimes negative.
`The absorption features around 2250 cm-’ are interest-
`ing because they provide information on the oxidation of the
`silicon during CMP A single broad, unpolarized feature at
`2250 cm-’
`is observed on CMP Si(lOO), while sharper, po-
`larized features are noted at 2113, 2250, 2285, and possibly
`2162 cm-’
`on CMP Si(ll1). Early model calculations,36
`electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) studies in UHV of
`H adsorption on oxygen-exposed silicon,37 and IR studies of
`the wet-chemica138-40 or UV/ozone-promoted41’42 oxidation
`of H-terminated silicon have assigned these features to sili-
`con hydrides with oxygen backbonding: 2250 cm-i corre-
`sponds to the stretch frequency of both dihydride and mono-
`hydride backbonded to two oxygens atoms, i.e., dihydrides,
`Hz+Si=(O-),,
`and monohydrides, H+Si=[(O-)2,(Si=j],
`both at -2250 cm-r . The mode at 2283 cm-’ corresponds to
`the stretch mode of monohydride backbonded to three oxy-
`gen atoms, H+--Si=[(O-),I,
`while
`the modes at 2113 and
`2162 cm-’ are assigned to mono and dihydrides backbonded
`to a single oxygen atom, i.e., HtSi=[(O-),,(Si=)J
`and
`HztSi=[(O-)r
`,(Si=),],
`respectively.37 For Si( loo), the ob-
`served band points to the dominance of hydrides backbonded
`to two oxygen atoms, although it is not possible to rule out
`hydrides backbonded to one oxygen atom because of the
`broad band centered at 2110 cm-“. For the Si( 11 l), a variety
`of oxidation states can be seen, as indicated with the solid
`and dashed arrows in the inset of Fig. 6.
`None of these oxygen-backbonded hydride features are
`observed on
`freshly HF-etched silicon surfaces.21’2Z3234
`They therefore are produced during or after the chemome-
`chanical polishing. If the oxygen is produced during the pol-
`ishing, then it is suggestive that a partial oxidation may play
`a role in the removal mechanism during CMP. There is, how-
`ever, no measurable change in the oxygen-backbonded hy-
`dride features with different slurry pH (i.e., removal rate), as
`seeninFig.6[pH=ll
`and>14forSi(lOO),andpH=ll
`and
`7 for Si( 1 ll)].
`It is therefore not possible to show that partial
`oxidation plays a role. The data do not rule out such a
`mechanism, because it is believed that a partial oxidation is
`the rate-limiting process in Si etching when- HF is present,21
`
`with a very fast removal of the oxide and subsequent H ter-
`mination. As a result, the interpretation of the data remains
`ambiguous.
`In the region labeled E, the broad absorption feature ap-
`pearing in some spectra is characteristic of hydroxyl or water
`species.34 It has been observed on hydrophilic Si surfaces or
`for OH or H20 in or on silica surfaces.43 It is difficult
`to
`measure reliably because of adsorption of water on the mir-
`rors, windows, and detector. Once again, the sandwich tech-
`nique, not used in earlier studies,‘e is crucial to obtain reli-
`able data. On Si(lOO), a band at -3100
`cm-”
`is only
`observed at high pH, e.g. >14 (or also for low pH<7; not
`shown here). This frequency is lower
`than most forms of
`hydroxyls at surfaces: Isolated OH obtained on annealed
`glasses peaks at -3750 cm-‘,43 while water on hydrophilic
`oxide layers shows a maximum around 3400 cm-‘.a4 Shifts
`to
`lower
`frequencies are possible
`for H-bonded OH
`groups, ‘3,34 however, the position of the absorption band is
`also consistent with the presence of ammonium fluoride. If
`this band observed at very high pH (and also very low pH
`C7; not shown here) is correlated to oxide formation
`then
`the findings of contact angle measurements2’ can be ex-
`plained in a consistent manner.
`
`IV. DISCUSSION
`
`To arrive at a microscopic model for the removal mecha-
`nism, we first summarize the observations. The main conclu-
`sion from the above studies is that the surfaces, obtained by
`CMP at a pH yielding
`the highest removal rates, are very
`similar
`to
`those obtained
`by
`etching
`in
`buffered
`
`HF21*22*25*29-34 or hot water with dissolved oxygen.3Qv44*45 The
`Si( 111) surfaces have flat, -monohydride-terminated
`(111)
`planes separated mostly by [21 l]-type atomic steps; Si(100)
`surfaces are atomically rough with a predominance of dihy-
`dride termination. The stock removal rate is also higher for
`Si(100) than for Si(ll
`l), just as observed in chemical etch-
`ing. These simple observations point to a dominant chemical
`action of CMP under usual conditions, that is, after any thin
`oxide is mechanically removed, at a slurry pH around 11.
`Next, there is evidence that OH- plays an active role in
`the removal mechanism, since the removal rate increases
`with pH, i.e., with OH- concentration. Furthermore, the con-
`centration of OH- decreases during CMP’”
`if the syton is not
`pH stabilized by buffering
`the slurry pH. The depletion of
`OH- and its detection at higher pH suggest that it partici-
`pates directl

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket