`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`
`
`SONY CORPORATION,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`RAYTHEON COMPANY,
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2015-01201
`
`Patent 5,591,678
`_______________
`
`JOINT NOTICE OF STIPULATION TO SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As permitted by the Scheduling Order, the Patent Owner and Petitioner have
`
`stipulated to revised dates for DUE DATES 1 and 2. The details of the stipulated
`
`schedule are included below:
`
`
`
`CURRENT SCHEDULE
`
`STIPULATED SCHEDULE
`
`DUE DATE 1
`
`March 7, 2016
`
`March 11, 2016
`
`DUE DATE 2
`
`June 9, 2016
`
`June 17, 2016
`
`A marked-up copy of the stipulated schedule is included as the next page.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Thomas J. Filarski, Reg. No. 31612/
`Thomas J. Filarski, Reg. No. 31,612
`
`
`
`
`Date: February 26, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Customer Number: 27890
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`115 S. LaSalle Street
`Chicago, IL 60603
`Telephone: (312) 577-1252
`Facsimile: (312) 577-1370
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01201
`Patent 5,591,678
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`INITIAL CONFERENCE CALL ..................................... UPON REQUEST
`
`DUE DATE 1 ..................................................................... February 24, 2016
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`March 7, 2016
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 ............................................................................ May 16, 2016
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`June 9, 2016
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 ............................................................................ June 15, 2016
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 ............................................................................... July 6, 2016
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`Motion to exclude evidence
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 ............................................................................. July 20, 2016
`Response to observation
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ............................................................................. July 27, 2016
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 ........................................................................ August 11, 2016
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned herby certifie s that a co py of the foregoing JOINT NOTICE OF
`
`STIPULATION TO SCHEDULING ORDE R was served in its entirety on
`
`February 26, 2016 by filing th is document through the Patent Review Processing
`
`System as well as by deliveri ng a copy vi a electronic email to the attorneys of
`
`record for the Patent Owner’s as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: February 26, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Matthew A. Smith
`Zhuanjia Gu
`TURNER BOYD LLP
`702 Marshall St., Ste. 640
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`smith@turnerboyd.com
`gu@turnerboyd.com
`
`Robert Hails
`BAKERHOSTETLER
`1050 Connecticut Ave., N.W.
`Suite 1100
`Washington, DC 20036-5304
`rhails@bakerlaw.com
`
`By:
`
`
`/Thomas J. Filarski, Reg. No. 31612/
`Thomas J. Filarski
`Registration No. 31,612
`Steptoe & Johnson, LLP
`115 S. LaSalle Street
`Chicago, IL 60603
`Telephone: 312-577-1252
`Facsimile: 312-577-1370
`
`Counsel for Raytheon Company
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
