Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`Federal Circuit Has Held Obvious To Combine
`Features From Two Microchips Into One Microchip
`
`MCM Portfolio LLC
`
`Federal circuit affirms Board’s conclusion “that one
`of ordinary skill in the art would have had both the
`knowledge and the inclination to place the functionality
`taught by Kobayashi and Kikuchi on a single chip.”
`
`MCM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company, 812 F.3d 1284, 1294 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 3
`
`59
`
`Ex. 1042-0059
`
`
`
`IV. (2)
`
`Federal Circuit Has Held Obvious To Combine
`Features From Two Microchips Into One Microchip
`
`MCM Portfolio LLC
`
`Federal circuit affirms Board’s conclusion “that one
`of ordinary skill in the art would have had both the
`knowledge and the inclination to place the functionality
`taught by Kobayashi and Kikuchi on a single chip.”
`
`MCM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company, 812 F.3d 1284, 1294 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 3
`
`59
`
`Ex. 1042-0059
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`60
`
`Ex. 1042-0060
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (3)
`
`Claims Require Activating and Deactivating a Function
`
`’726 Patent
`
`1
`
`2
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 6
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 33, 40-44, Rep. at 13-14; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 29-32, Rep. at 18-19; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 32-39, 42-44, Rep. at 10-11;
`IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 32-36, 40-42, Rep. at 14-15; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 32, 36-42, 52-54 Rep. at 14-16; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 35-39, Rep. at 19-20
`
`61
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 9
`
`Ex. 1042-0061
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (3)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Whether Beard ’290’s Display of Remaining Battery
`Capacity is a Visible Indication
`
`Whether Beard ’290’s Disclosure of Remaining Time
`Estimates for Remaining Battery Life is a Function
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 13-14; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 18-19; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 14-15; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 14-16; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 19-20
`
`62
`
`Ex. 1042-0062
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (3)
`
`PO Contends Remaining Battery Capacity And Time Estimates
`Are A Single Function
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 43
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Resp. at 43; IPR2015-01172 Resp. at 14; IPR2015-01173 Resp. at 21; IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 47; IPR2015-01175 Resp. at 50;
`IPR2015-01603 Resp. at 14
`
`63
`
`Ex. 1042-0063
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`IV. (3)
`Beard ’290 Repeatedly Describes Calculating And Displaying Battery Capacity As
`A Different Function From Calculating And Displaying A Remaining Time Estimate
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`1
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 11:45-48 (see also Abstract, 10:37-40, 12:59-65)
`
`See, e.g.,
`
`IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 12-13, 40-44, Rep. at 13-14; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 12, 32, Rep. at 18-19; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 13, 42-44, Rep. at 10-11;
`IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 12-13, 32-33, Rep. at 14-15; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 11-12, 33-34, 41-42, 53 Rep. at 14-16; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 14, Rep. at 19-20
`
`64
`
`Ex. 1042-0064
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (3)
`
`PO’s Expert Concedes That Each Of These Are Different “Functions”
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`12
`
`Q. Determining remaining time in a battery
`is
`a
`different
`function
`than
`just
`determining battery capacity, right?
`
`A. Correct. The -- determining the time, you
`would need to know what the draw is, and if
`you know the capacity and the draw, you can
`estimate the time until it's discharged.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 126:16-22
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 14; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 18-19; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 14-15;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 15
`
`65
`
`Ex. 1042-0065
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`66
`
`Ex. 1042-0066
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (4)
`
`Claims Require “An Activation Signal”
`
`’726 Patent
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 6
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 19
`
`PO argues repeated references to “an activation signal”
`must refer to different signals
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Resp. at 22-23; IPR2015-01173 Resp. at 22-23; IPR2015-01175 Resp. at 28-29
`
`67
`
`Ex. 1042-0067
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (4)
`
`PO Argues Repeated References To “An Activation Signal”
`Must Refer To Different Signals
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 22
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Resp. at 22-23; IPR2015-01173 Resp. at 22-23; IPR2015-01175 Resp. at 28-29
`
`68
`
`Ex. 1042-0068
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (4)
`
`“An Activation Signal” Means One Or More Activation Signals
`
`• Indefinite article “an” means only
`each signal may be the same
`or different
`
`• Nothing in the claims or
`specification requires these
`activation signals to be different
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 6
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 19
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 18; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 18-19
`
`69
`
`Ex. 1042-0069
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (4)
`
`“An Activation Signal” (’970 Patent)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 14-15
`
`70
`
`Ex. 1042-0070
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (4)
`
`The Claims Of The ’970 Patent Simply Define
`The Signal In A More Specific Way In Each Claim
`
`’970 Patent
`
`• All three are “activation signals”
`
`• Dependent claims narrow to
`specific types of activation signals
`
`• Indefinite article means
`each signal could be the same
`or different
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001, (’970 patent) Claim 1 (excerpt)
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001, (’970 patent) Claim 12
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001, (’970 patent) Claim 19
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 14-15
`
`71
`
`Ex. 1042-0071
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`72
`
`Ex. 1042-0072
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (5)
`
`Beard ’290 Discloses That The Power Source
`Is Enclosed In The Product Housing
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 3
`
`PO’s Response
`
`Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 40
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Resp. at 40; IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 43; IPR2015-01175 Resp. at 52
`
`73
`
`Ex. 1042-0073
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (5)
`
`Beard ’290 Discloses That The Power Source
`Is Enclosed In The Product Housing
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 9:15-16
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 38-39, Rep. at 23-25; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 36-38, Rep. at 22-24; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 42-43, Rep. at 20-22
`
`74
`
`Ex. 1042-0074
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (5)
`
`Beard ’290 Discloses That The Power Source
`Is Enclosed In The Product Housing
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 9:15-16
`
`product
`housing
`
`(annotated)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 38-39, Rep. at 23-25; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 36-38, Rep. at 22-24; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 42-43, Rep. at 20-22
`
`75
`
`Ex. 1042-0075
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`76
`
`Ex. 1042-0076
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (6)
`
`PO Seeks To Create Another New Limitation,
`The Single User Interface, Where None Exists
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 (‘726 Patent) Claim 4
`
`PO’s Response
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Resp. at 47; IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 49
`
`77
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 47
`
`Ex. 1042-0077
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`The “User Interface” Is Not Limited To A Single Component—It Can Have
`Multiple Parts, One Of Which Must Be A Touch Sensor According To The Claims
`
`IV. (6)
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 (‘726 Patent) Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 (‘726 Patent) Claim 4
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 50-51, Rep. at 19-21
`
`78
`
`Ex. 1042-0078
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (6)
`
`Beard ’290 Discloses A Touch Sensor Used To Activate Visible Indications And
`Danielson Discloses An “On/Off Switch” Used To Activate Or Deactivate The Product
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at Fig. 11
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 50-51, Rep. at 19-21; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 39-42, Rep. at 17-19
`
`79
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1007 (Danielson) at 22:65-66
`
`Ex. 1042-0079
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (6)
`
`PO’s Expert Confirmed That A User Interface Is Simply “An Interface
`On A Device That Allows A User To Interact With The Device”
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`A. To me, a user interface is what it says in the plain
`use of the language. It's an interface on a device
`that allows a user to interact with the device. So
`it's something that a user interacts with on a
`product, user interface.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1036 (Morley Microsoft Tr.) at 151:24-152:3
`
`Q. So you wouldn't consider a desktop computer that had
`
`both a keyboard and a mouse to have a single user
`
`interface? You'd consider those multiple interfaces?
`
`A. Those might be combined into one, and the mouse
`might even be plugged into the keyboard in that
`case.
`
`Q. How about the on/off switch above a keyboard on a
`
`laptop? Would that be part of the user interface?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 136:16-137:4
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 20; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 17-18
`
`80
`
`Ex. 1042-0080
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (6)
`
`’980 Patent
`
`81
`
`Ex. 1042-0081
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (6)
`
`The “ON/OFF” Switch In Danielson Meets This Limitation
`
`’980 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex.1001 (‘980 Patent) Claim 4
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1007 (Danielson) at 22:65-66
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 39-42, Rep. at 17-19
`
`82
`
`Ex. 1042-0082
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`IV. (6)
`Beard ’290’s Disclosure Of Activating And Deactivating Display Of Battery
`Capacity And Remaining Time Estimates Also Meets This Limitation
`
`’980 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex.1001 (‘980 Patent) Claim 4
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 39-42, Rep. at 17-19
`
`83
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 10:37-40
`
`Ex. 1042-0083
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`84
`
`Ex. 1042-0084
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`Claims Require A
`“Location Indicator”
`
`’970 Patent, Claim 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 32-35, Rep. at 5-9
`
`85
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001 (‘970 Patent), Claim 1
`
`Ex. 1042-0085
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`Beard ’290 Discloses A
`“Location Indicator”
`
`’970 Patent, Claim 1 (excerpt)
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001 (‘970 Patent), Claim 1 (excerpt)
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 32-35, Rep. at 5-9
`
`86
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1005 (Beard), 4:59-67
`
`Ex. 1042-0086
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`PO Would Interpret “Location Indicator”
`To Preclude Activation by User Interface
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Resp. at 13
`
`87
`
`Ex. 1042-0087
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`PO Would Interpret “Location Indicator”
`To Preclude Activation by User Interface
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01173 Paper 19 (PO Resp.) at 13
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 2003 (Morley Decl.) at ¶69
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Resp. at 13, 16
`
`88
`
`Ex. 1042-0088
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`’970 Patent Claims Expressly Contradict PO’s
`Narrow Interpretation Of A Location Indicator
`
`’970 Patent, Claim 1
`
`Claims state
`that the “location
`indicator” can
`be activated by
`user interface
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001 (‘970 Patent), Claim 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 6-7
`
`89
`
`Ex. 1042-0089
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`’970 Patent Specification Discloses
`Indicator Being Activated By Touch Sensor
`
`’970 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001, (’970 patent), 9:49-58
`
`Specification describes
`“location indicator” can be
`activated by user interface
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Reply 7-8
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001, (’970 patent), Fig 11
`
`90
`
`Ex. 1042-0090
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`’970 Patent Specification Discloses
`Indicator Being Activated By Touch Sensor
`
`’970 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001 (’970 patent), 9:49-58
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 32-35, Rep. at 7-8
`
`91
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1005 (Beard), 4:63-67
`
`Ex. 1042-0091
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`PO’s Expert Admits Beard ’290’s LEDs Are A Location Indicator
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`Q. Let me give you a hypothetical. Let’s suppose you and
`I were in this room and it was totally dark and we
`couldn’t see each other. And in your hand was a battery
`pack as described in the Beard prior art reference. And
`in the dark, you touched the contacts and illuminated the
`LEDs. Are you with me so far?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. And let’s say they stayed on for a period of ten seconds.
`If I looked at you in the dark and my view was
`unobstructed, wouldn’t it tell me the location of the
`battery pack that was in your hand?
`
`A. It would.
`
`Q. And I didn’t need to touch it for that to happen, did I?
`
`A. No, you didn’t.
`
`Q. Or to know where the device was beforehand, right?
`
`A. Correct.
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1036 (Morley Tr.) at 160:15-161:12
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 9
`
`92
`
`Ex. 1042-0092
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`93
`
`Ex. 1042-0093
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (8)
`
`Prior Art Discloses Activation Of
`A Visual Indication Without Activating Load
`
`The issue is whether Beard ’290 describes controlling a
`“visible indicator . . . when the load is not activated by the user”
`
`’980 Patent
`
`1
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1001 (‘980 Patent), Claim 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 32-36, Rep. at 19-22
`
`94
`
`Ex. 1042-0094
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (8)
`
`Prior Art Discloses Activation Of A Visual Indication On Battery
`Pack Even When Battery Pack Not Connected To Load
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`1
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 9:16-33
`
`Because the visible indication can be displayed when
`the battery pack is removed, the indication can also be
`displayed when inserted but the load is not activated
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1005 (Beard), Fig. 8
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 34-37, Rep. at 19-20
`
`95
`
`Ex. 1042-0095
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`Beard ’290 Expressly States That The Device Is Not Always On—
`It Is Only Operational “When The Operator So Desires”
`
`IV. (8)
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01174 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 38
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 38, Rep. at 20
`
`96
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 12:2-4
`
`Ex. 1042-0096
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`PO Argues That Visible Indication Only Activated When Load Is Active
`In Beard ’290 Because Every Component Of The Beard ’290 Device Is Always On
`
`IV. (8)
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01174 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 38
`
`’980 Patent
`
`Nothing in
`the claim
`requires terminal
`device in an
`operational state
`
`1
`
`2
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 38, Rep. at 20-21
`
`97
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1001 (‘980 Patent), Claim 1
`
`Ex. 1042-0097
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`98
`
`Ex. 1042-0098
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`The Board Should Decline To Construe “User Interface”
`(’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 22; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 20
`
`99
`
`Ex. 1042-0099
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`The Board Should Decline To Construe “User Interface”
`
`Term
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“user interface”
`
`“an interface between a
`device and its operator
`to receive and manage
`an input command from
`the operator”
`
`PO never applies this construction in its analysis and never explains why this
`construction could be relevant to any issue in this proceeding
`
`Only terms which are in controversy need to be construed and only to the extent
`necessary to resolve the controversy
`
`Vivid Techs., Inc. v. Am. Sci. & Eng’g, Inc., 200 F.3d 795, 803 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 22; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 20
`
`100
`
`Ex. 1042-0100
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`The Board Should Decline To Construe
`“Touch Sens[or/ing] Functions” (’952)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 19
`
`101
`
`Ex. 1042-0101
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`The Board Should Decline To Construe
`“Touch Sens[or/ing] Functions”
`
`Term
`
`“touch sens[or/ing]
`functions”
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“functions of the device
`that are activated or
`controlled in response
`to touch sensor inputs”
`
`PO never applies this construction in its analysis and never explains why this
`construction could be relevant to any issue in this proceeding
`
`Only terms which are in controversy need to be construed and only to the extent
`necessary to resolve the controversy
`
`Vivid Techs., Inc. v. Am. Sci. & Eng’g, Inc., 200 F.3d 795, 803 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 19
`
`102
`
`Ex. 1042-0102
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Construction of “Function”
`
`103
`
`Ex. 1042-0103
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`PO’s Proposed Construction Should Be Rejected
`
`Term
`
`Petitioner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`plain meaning
`
`“A function
`that was activated in
`response to an activation
`signal, received from said
`user interface”
`
`(Claims 6 and 19)
`
`“a function, different from
`activation of a visible
`indication, that was
`activated in response to
`an activation signal,
`different from an
`activation signal for
`activating the visible
`indication, received from
`the same user interface
`as the activation signal
`for activating the visible
`indication”
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 15-16; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 15-16; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 12-13; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 15-16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 15-16
`
`104
`
`Ex. 1042-0104
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`The Specification Uses “Function” Very Broadly
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent) at 8:58-63
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent) at 1:55-58
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 13-14; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 18; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 18
`
`105
`
`Ex. 1042-0105
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`PO Reads In Negative Limitations Without Justification
`
`Term
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“A Function
`
`“a function,
`
`That Was Activated In Response
`To An Activation Signal,
`
`that was activated in response
`to an activation signal,
`
`different from activation of a visible
`indication,
`
`different from an activation signal for
`activating the visible indication,
`
`Received From Said User Interface”
`
`received from the same user interface
`
`(Claims 6 and 19)
`
`as the activation signal for activating the
`visible indication”
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 15-16; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 15-16; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 12-13; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 15-16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 15-16
`
`106
`
`Ex. 1042-0106
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Patent Owner Argues “Function” Must Have
`A Different Meaning From Activation Of The Visible Indication
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 19 (PO Resp.) at 22
`
`Petitioners Agree “Function” Is Broader Than
`“Activation Of A Visible Indication”
`
`Function
`
`activation of the
`visible indication
`
`Car
`
`sedan
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 16; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 16; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 12-13; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 15-16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 17
`
`107
`
`Ex. 1042-0107
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`PO’s Own Expert Acknowledges
`Activation Of The Indicator Is A Function
`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`Q. So indicating a condition of the battery,
`whether it’s good or bad, is another example
`of a function according to the Global Touch
`patents, right?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 118:21-119:3
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 16; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 13; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 17-18; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 17
`
`108
`
`Ex. 1042-0108
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`PO’s Own Expert Acknowledges
`Activation Of The Indicator Is A Function
`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`IPR2015-01172 Ex. 2002 (Morley Decl.) at ¶50
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 16-17; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 13; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 18; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 17-18
`
`109
`
`Ex. 1042-0109
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`When PO Intended To Claim Only
`“Other Functions,” It Did So Expressly
`
`’749 Patent
`
`U.S. Patent Application No. 09/169,395
`
`IPR2015-01172 Ex. 1001 ('749 Patent), Claim 21
`
`IPR2015-01172 Ex. 1038 (395 Application), Claim 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 18
`
`110
`
`Ex. 1042-0110
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Beard ’290’s Timing Circuit
`
`111
`
`Ex. 1042-0111
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Beard ’290 Discloses A Timing Circuit
`To Time How Long The Display Is Active
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 10:51-56
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 15; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 20; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 11; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 16
`
`112
`
`Ex. 1042-0112
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Use Of This Timing Circuit Is A Function
`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`Q. At line 50, the specification of the Beard patent
`describes that, quote, A timing circuit prevents
`the contact 155 from holding the display 157 and
`associated circuitry in an active state for more
`than a ten-second interval. After the ten-second
`display period, deactivation occurs whether or not
`the contact 155 is being touched, close quote. Did
`I read that correctly?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`in
`discussed
`we
`as
`function
`timing
`a
`Q. Using
`reference to the Global Touch patents is another
`example of a function according to those Global
`Touch patents, right?
`
`A. That was cited as a function there, yes.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 125:4-18
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 15; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 20; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 11; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 15
`
`113
`
`Ex. 1042-0113
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Beard ’290’s Timing Circuit Meets the Other Claim Limitations
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 6
`
`Beard, Petitioners’ Expert
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 15; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 20; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 12; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 16; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 20-21
`
`114
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1034 (Beard Suppl. Decl.) at ¶¶9-10
`
`Ex. 1042-0114
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Rathmann Discloses Activating A Visual Indication
`Without Activating Load
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 34-36, Rep. at 21-22
`
`115
`
`Ex. 1042-0115
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`PO Argues Rathmann Does Not Disclose Visible Indicator
`Activated “When The Load Is Not Activated By The User”
`
`PO’s Response
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`IPR2015-01174 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 37-41
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 37, 41
`
`116
`
`Ex. 1042-0116
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Rathmann Displays The Visible Indication
`When The Load Is Not Activated By The User
`
`Rathmann ’869 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1006 (Rathmann) at 16:24-29
`
`Because the visible indication can be displayed when
`the battery module is removed, the indication can also
`be displayed when inserted but the load is not activated
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 34-36, Rep. at 21-22
`
`117
`
`Ex. 1042-0117
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
