throbber
Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Apple Inc., et al.,
`Petitioners
`v.
`Global Touch Solutions, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`IPR2015-01171 (U.S. Patent No. 7,994,726 B2)*
`IPR2015-01172 (U.S. Patent No. 7,498,749 B2)**
`IPR2015-01603 (U.S. Patent No. 7,498,749 B2)***
`IPR2015-01173 (U.S. Patent No. 7,329,970 B2)**
`IPR2015-01174 (U.S. Patent No. 7,781,980 B2)*
`IPR2015-01175 (U.S. Patent No. 8,288,952 B2)*
`
`Trial Hearing
`August 3, 2016
`
`* Petitioners Apple Inc.; Motorola Mobility, LLC
`** Petitioners Apple Inc.; Motorola Mobility, LLC; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
`*** Petitioners Apple Inc.; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
`
`1
`
`Ex. 1042-0001
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Overview
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`III. Undisputed Issues
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`2
`
`Ex. 1042-0002
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`The Patents Are Directed To Portable Electronic
`Devices With Touch Sensors And Exhaustible Power Sources
`
`Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 4
`
`3
`
`Ex. 1042-0003
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`The Patents Are Directed To Portable Electronic
`Devices With Touch Sensors And Exhaustible Power Sources
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Abstract
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Fig. 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Fig. 12
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 5-6, 29
`
`4
`
`Ex. 1042-0004
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`The Patents Are Directed To Portable Electronic
`Devices With Touch Sensors And Exhaustible Power Sources
`
`US 6,249,089
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001
`Continuation-in-part
`
`IPR2015-01172,
`IPR2015-01603 Ex. 1001
`
`US 7,443,101
`
`US 6,621,225
`
`US 6,650,066
`
`US 6,952,084
`
`US 7,336,037
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001
`US 6,984,900
`
`US 7,084,531
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1001
`
`IPR2015-01175 Ex. 1001
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 1
`
`5
`
`Continuation
`
`Continuation-in-part
`
`Ex. 1042-0005
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`The Patents Are Directed To Portable Electronic
`Devices With Touch Sensors And Exhaustible Power Sources
`
`US 6,249,089
`
`Continuation-in-part
`
`US 6,621,225
`
`US 6,650,066
`
`US 6,952,084
`
`US 7,336,037
`
`US 7,443,101
`
`US 6,984,900
`
`US 7,084,531
`
`Continuation
`
`Continuation-in-part
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 1
`
`6
`
`Ex. 1042-0006
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`The Patents Are Directed To Portable Electronic
`Devices With Touch Sensors And Exhaustible Power Sources
`
`’726 Patent Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 28-36
`
`7
`
`Ex. 1042-0007
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Overview
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`III. Undisputed Issues
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`8
`
`Ex. 1042-0008
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`The Prior Art References
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`Beard ’290 Patent; IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent; IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1007
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`Rathmann ’869 Patent; IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1006
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 4; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 4; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 4; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 4; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 4; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 5
`
`9
`
`Ex. 1042-0009
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Beard ’290 Patent Discloses A Battery Pack And Terminal
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`battery pack
`
`battery powered
`electronic device
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 11, 31; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 10, 26; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 11, 29; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 11, 30;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 10, 29; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 13, 33
`
`10
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard), Fig. 8
`
`Ex. 1042-0010
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Beard ’290 Patent Discloses A Battery Pack And Terminal
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 9:16-33
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 12-13; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 11-12; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 12-13; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 12-13;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 11-12; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 14-15
`
`11
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard), Fig. 8
`
`Ex. 1042-0011
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Beard ’290 Patent Discloses A Battery Pack And Terminal
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`battery pack
`
`device
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard), Fig. 11
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 17, 31; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 19, 26; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 17, 29; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 17, 30;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 16, 29; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 18, 33
`
`12
`
`Ex. 1042-0012
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Beard ’290 Patent Discloses A Battery Pack And Terminal
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 12:59-65
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 11:45-48
`
`battery pack
`
`device
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard), Fig. 11
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 17, 31, Rep. at 15; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 19, 26, Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 17, 29, Rep. at 11;
`IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 17, 30, Rep. at 15; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 16, 29, Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 18, 33, Rep. at 20
`
`13
`
`Ex. 1042-0013
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Beard ’290 Patent Discloses A Battery Pack And Terminal
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171, Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 11:10-12
`
`IPR2015-01171, Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 11:67-12:4
`
`battery pack
`
`device
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard), Fig. 11
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 12, 30; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 11, 25; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 12, 30; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 12, 30;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 11, 28; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 14, 33
`
`14
`
`Ex. 1042-0014
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent Discloses More Detail About The Terminal
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1007 (Danielson), Fig. 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 17; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 17; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 17; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 16; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 17
`
`15
`
`Ex. 1042-0015
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Rathmann ’869 Patent Discloses The Duracell Battery Operating System
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`Rathmann ’869 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1006 (Rathmann) at 5:48-58
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 16; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 16; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 16; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 16; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 15;
`IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 16
`
`16
`
`Ex. 1042-0016
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Overview
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`III. Undisputed Issues
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`17
`
`Ex. 1042-0017
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`III. Undisputed Issues
`
`No Dispute Re Prior Art Priority Dates
`
`No dispute Beard ’290 is prior art under at least
`35 U.S.C. § 102(e)
`
`No dispute Rathmann is prior art under at least
`35 U.S.C. § 102(e)
`
`No dispute Danielson is prior art under at least
`35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a) and 102(e)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 11, 14, 17; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 10, 13; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 13, 15, 17; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 11, 14, 17;
`IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 11, 14, 17; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 10, 13, 16
`
`18
`
`Ex. 1042-0018
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`III. Undisputed Issues
`
`Unrebutted Testimony Re Motivation To Combine
`
`Beard, Petitioners’ Expert
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`NO
`REBUTTAL
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1003 (Beard Decl.) at ¶¶95, 103
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 19-28; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 17-22; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 19-27; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 19-27; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 17-26;
`IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 21-28
`
`19
`
`Ex. 1042-0019
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Overview
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`III. Undisputed Issues
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`20
`
`Ex. 1042-0020
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`21
`
`Ex. 1042-0021
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`Argument
`
`’726 Patent
`IPR2015-01171
`
`’749 Patent
`IPR2015-01172
`
`’749 Patent
`IPR2015-01603
`
`’970 Patent
`IPR2015-01173
`
`’980 Patent
`IPR2015-01174
`
`’952 Patent
`IPR2015-01175
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`(4)
`
`(5)
`
`(6)
`
`(7)
`
`(8)
`
`Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not
`Disclose The Claimed “Energy
`Consuming Load”
`
`Beard And Rathmann In View Of
`Danielson Does Not Disclose Microchip
`Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming
`Load” And The Indicator
`
`Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not
`Disclose Deactivation Of A “Function”
`In Addition To The Visible Indicator
`
`Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not
`Disclose A Different Activation Signal For
`The Function
`
`Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not
`Disclose A Power Source Enclosed In The
`Product Housing
`
`Beard And Rathmann In View Of
`Danielson Does Not Disclose A Touch
`Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same
`User Interface
`
`Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not
`Disclose The Claimed “Location
`Indicator”
`
`Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not
`Disclose Activation Of A Visible
`Indication Without Activating Load
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`22
`
`Ex. 1042-0022
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`Patent Owner’s Consistent Errors
`
`Patent Owner impermissibly reads limitations from
`embodiments in the specification into the claims
`
`Patent Owner misreads the claim language to
`add new limitations not required by the claims
`
`Patent Owner misreads the plain disclosure of
`the prior art
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 2-10, 13-15, 18-25; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 2-12, 14-20; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 5-15; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 2-10, 13-24;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 2-10, 13-19, 20-22; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 2-12, 14-21
`
`23
`
`Ex. 1042-0023
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`24
`
`Ex. 1042-0024
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Claims Require “Energy Consuming Load”
`
`’726 Patent Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 28, Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 23, Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 31, Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 29, Rep. at 3;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 27, Rep. at 3
`
`25
`
`Ex. 1042-0025
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Plain Meaning Of “Energy Consuming Load” Undisputed
`
`Beard, Petitioners’ Expert
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1003 (Beard Decl.) at ¶116
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`A. Okay. So I believe that something could be
`an
`energy-consuming
`load
`whether,
`in
`general, whether it's under control of a
`micro or not. If it's a load and it consumes
`energy,
`it's
`an
`energy-consuming
`load,
`generically speaking, yes.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1036 (Morley Microsoft Tr.) at 102:1-5
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 8, Rep. at 3-4; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 9, Rep. at 4; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 9; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 8, Rep. at 3-4;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 8, Rep. at 4; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 10, Rep. at 4
`
`26
`
`Ex. 1042-0026
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO Argues Petitioners’ Construction Is Improperly Broad
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 25
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Resp. at 25; IPR2015-01172 Resp. at 12; IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 23; IPR2015-01175 Resp. at 31; IPR2015-01603 Resp. at 12
`
`27
`
`Ex. 1042-0027
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Patent Owner Admits That Beard ’290 Discloses
`“Energy Consuming Load” Under Plain And Ordinary Meaning
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`Q. So if the board does not adopt your
`construction of
`energy consuming
`load, but it views it as energy
`consuming component of the device,
`Beard would disclose that claim
`limitation, correct?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 170:2-7
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 12-13; -IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 10-12;
`IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 12-13
`
`28
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at Fig. 11
`
`Ex. 1042-0028
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Proposed Construction Should Be Rejected
`
`Term
`
`Petitioner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“Energy Consuming
`Load”
`
`plain meaning;
`
`(“any part of the product
`that consumes energy
`when the product is used”)
`
`“an energy-consuming
`component that receives
`power from the power
`source under the control
`of the microchip”
`
`The issue is whether the specification
`disclaims or deviates from the plain and ordinary meaning
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 8, Resp. at 20; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 9, Resp. at 12; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 9; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 8, Resp. at 20;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 8, Resp. at 31; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 10, Resp. at 11
`
`29
`
`Ex. 1042-0029
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Board Declined To Construe “Energy Consuming Load”
`
`Petition
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 3 (Petition) at 8
`
`Institution Decision
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 8, Inst. Dec. at 4; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 9, Inst. Dec. at 4; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 9, Inst. Dec. at 5;
`IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 8, Inst. Dec. at 5; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 8, Inst. Dec. at 4-5; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 10, Inst. Dec. at 5
`
`30
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper No. 8 (Inst. Dec.) at 4
`
`Ex. 1042-0030
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Claims Do Not Require Microchip To Control Power To The Load
`
`’726 Patent, Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`
`The claims do not require microchip to control power to the load
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 28, Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 23, Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 31, Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 29, Rep. at 3;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 27, Rep. at 3
`
`31
`
`Ex. 1042-0031
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Claims Do Not Require Microchip To Control Power To The Load
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`Q. There’s nothing in the language of claim 1
`that requires the energy consuming load to
`receive
`power
`under
`the
`control
`of
`the
`microchip, is there?
`
`THE WITNESS: There is no specific mention of
`controlling that.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 91:22-93:7 (objection omitted)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 3
`
`32
`
`Ex. 1042-0032
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Features Found In Every Embodiment
`Should Still Not Be Read Into The Claims
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 19
`
`Thorner:
`
`“It is not enough for a patentee to simply disclose a single
`embodiment or use a word in the same manner
`in all
`embodiments, the patentee must ‘clearly express an intent’ to
`redefine the term.”
`
`Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, 669 F.3d 1362, 1365 (2012)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 6-7; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 5-6; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 5-6; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 6-7; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 6-7
`
`33
`
`Ex. 1042-0033
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO Attempts To Limit Claims To Specific Embodiments
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 16
`
`1) No mention
`nor definition
`of “energy
`consuming load”
`
`2) Does not
`say microchip
`controls power
`to load
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at 3:61-66
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 4-5; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 6; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 6; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 4-5; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 5
`
`34
`
`Ex. 1042-0034
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`’726 Patent Summary Of The Invention
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at 5:6
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at 3:61
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 4-5; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 6; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 6; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 4-5; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 5
`
`35
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at 4:47
`
`Ex. 1042-0035
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Support Does Not Describe
`Microchip Control Of Power To The Load
`
`PO’s Response
`
`This passage
`does not require
`the microchip to
`control power
`to the load
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 18
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 5; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 5; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 6
`
`36
`
`Ex. 1042-0036
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Support Describes Exemplary Embodiment In Fig. 2
`
`’726 Patent
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at 5:57-59
`
`This is not the
`“very character”
`of the invention
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at 7:12-31
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 5; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 5; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 6
`
`37
`
`Ex. 1042-0037
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Expert Testimony Should Be Given No Weight
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`1
`
`2 3 4
`
`A. To paraphrase that because, as you read it, it
`looked a little bit on the clumsy side, I
`would say that back to my -- I think I said
`this earlier -- what I think the patent
`teaches is an energy consuming load is a load
`whose
`power
`supply
`is
`controlled
`by
`the
`microchip. So there has to be a switch in
`series
`between
`the
`power
`supply,
`or
`exhaustible power supply if it's a battery --
`there's the switch that is controlled by the
`microchip,
`and
`then
`there's
`the
`load
`downstream so that in order for power to come
`from the power source and get to the load, it
`has
`to
`go
`through
`that
`switch
`that
`is
`controlled by the microchip.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035, “Morley Tr.” at 88:4-19
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 5-6; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 6; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 6
`
`38
`
`Ex. 1042-0038
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Applying PO’s Construction Consistently Would
`Add A Microchip To Claims That Do Not Require One
`
`Claim requires a microchip:
`
`Claim DOES NOT require a microchip:
`
`’726 Patent
`
`’749 Patent (sibling of the ’726 Patent)
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1041 ('749 Patent), Claim 21
`
`Applying PO’s construction to this
`claim would add a microchip that is
`nowhere in the claim language
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 10; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 10; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 10
`
`39
`
`Ex. 1042-0039
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`When Patentee Wished To Include A Requirement That
`The Microchip Control Power To The Load, It Did So
`
`’726 Patent
`
`’970 Patent (CIP sibling of the ’726 Patent)
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1037 ('970 Patent), Claim 52
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 7-8; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 9-10; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 9-10; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 7-8; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 8
`
`40
`
`Ex. 1042-0040
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Construction Contradicts Controlling Law
`
`’726 Patent
`
`’970 Patent (CIP sibling of the ’726 Patent)
`
`In re Rambus Inc.:
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`
`“[U]nless otherwise compelled the same
`claim term in the same patent or related patents
`carries the same construed meaning.”
`
`Ex. 1037 ('970 Patent), Claim 52
`
`In re Rambus Inc., 694 F.3d 42, 48 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (internal quotations and alterations omitted)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 8; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 9
`
`41
`
`Ex. 1042-0041
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO Avoids Construing
`“Energy Consuming Load” For The ’970 Patent
`
`’726 Patent
`
`’970 Patent (CIP sibling of the ’726 Patent)
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“an energy-consuming component
`that receives power from the
`power source under the control
`of the microchip”
`
`Ex. 1037 ('970 Patent), Claim 52
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 20
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1039 (IPR2015-01173 PO Resp.)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 11; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 8-9
`
`42
`
`Ex. 1042-0042
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Applying PO’s Construction
`Consistently Would Make Claim 52 Redundant
`
`’970 Patent (CIP sibling of the ’726 Patent)
`
`component
`under
`the
`
`[energy-consuming
`that receives power from the power source
`control of the microchip]
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1037 ('970 Patent), Claim 52
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 9-10; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 11-12; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 11; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 9; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 9-10
`
`43
`
`Ex. 1042-0043
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Reliance On Alloc Is Misplaced
`
`Alloc:
`
`is impermissible to read the one and only
`“[I]t
`disclosed embodiment into a claim without other indicia
`that the patentee so intended to limit the invention.”
`
`Alloc, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, 342 F.3d 1361, 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
`
`Here:
`
`There is no ‘other indicia’ needed to limit the claims
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 7
`
`44
`
`Ex. 1042-0044
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Reliance On Alloc Is Misplaced
`
`Alloc:
`
`“The applicant expressly disavowed systems without
`play
`during
`prosecution
`of
`the
`parent
`’621
`application. See Middleton, 311 F.3d at 1388.”
`
`Alloc, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, 342 F.3d 1361, 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
`
`Here:
`
`PO points to no express disavowal during prosecution
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 7
`
`45
`
`Ex. 1042-0045
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Reliance On Alloc Is Misplaced
`
`Alloc:
`
`“Moreover, unlike the patent-at-issue in Sunrace, the
`'907 specification also distinguished the prior art on the
`basis of play. Id.”
`
`Alloc, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, 342 F.3d 1369IPR2015-01171 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
`
`Here:
`
`’726 Patent distinguishes the prior art based on
`“activating switch 102 does not conduct current to the load 105,”
`not based on the microchip controlling power to the load
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 7
`
`46
`
`Ex. 1042-0046
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Reliance On Alloc Is Misplaced
`
`Alloc:
`
`the
`the ’907 specification indicates that
`“Here,
`invention is indeed exclusively directed toward flooring
`products including play.”
`
`Alloc, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, 342 F.3d 1369IPR2015-01171 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
`
`Here:
`
`’726 Patent indicates that the disclosure
`is only exemplary embodiments
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at Abstract; 3:61-66; 4:12, 20, 30, 47, 56, 63;
`5:6, 16, 25, 34-35, 44-49, 57-59; 7:14, 18-23; 12:21-25
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 7
`
`47
`
`Ex. 1042-0047
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Even Under PO’s Incorrect Construction,
`Beard ’290 Discloses An “Energy Consuming Load”
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 11-12; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 12-14; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 12-14; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 11-12; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 10-12
`
`48
`
`Ex. 1042-0048
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Even Under PO’s Incorrect Construction,
`Beard ’290 Discloses An “Energy Consuming Load”
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“an energy-consuming
`component that receives
`power from the power
`source under the control
`of the microchip”
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 20
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 11-12; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 12-14; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 12-14; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 11-12; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 10-12
`
`49
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at Fig. 11
`
`Ex. 1042-0049
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Even Under PO’s Incorrect Construction,
`Beard ’290 Discloses An “Energy Consuming Load”
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`diagram,
`the
`along
`Continuing
`Q. Okay.
`there's
`beneath
`the
`control
`circuitry
`infrared
`interface
`circuitry
`and
`an
`Beard ’290 Patent
`transceiver that you mentioned a moment
`ago, right?
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“an energy-consuming
`component that receives
`power from the power
`source under the control
`of the microchip”
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 20
`
`those
`
`also
`
`consume
`
`energy,
`
`A. Yes.
`of
`Q. Both
`correct?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And then the interface circuitry would
`receive that power from the batteries,
`right?
`A. Correct.
`another
`is
`transceiver
`Q. The
`infrared
`component that would receive energy from
`the batteries?
`A. Yes.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 143:19-144:11
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 13; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 14; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 13-14; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 13; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 13
`
`50
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at Fig. 11
`
`Ex. 1042-0050
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Even Under PO’s Incorrect Construction,
`Beard ’290 Discloses An “Energy Consuming Load”
`
`Beard, Petitioners’ Expert
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“an energy-consuming
`component that receives
`power from the power
`source under the control
`of the microchip”
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 20
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1034 (Beard Suppl. Decl.) at ¶6
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 13; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 14; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 14; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 13; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 13
`
`51
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at Fig. 11
`
`Ex. 1042-0051
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`52
`
`Ex. 1042-0052
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`’970 Patent Claim 52 Expressly Requires
`Microchip Control Of Power To Load In Addition To Indicator
`
`’970 Patent, Claim 52
`
`1
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001 ('970 Patent), Claim 52
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 48-58, Rep. at 2
`
`53
`
`Ex. 1042-0053
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`No Dispute Danielson Discloses Using
`Microchip To Control Power To The Load
`
`1
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1007 (Danielson) at 23:18-25
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`NO
`DISPUTE
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1007 (Danielson), Fig. 22 (excerpt)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 54-56, Resp. at 7-12
`
`54
`
`Ex. 1042-0054
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`No Dispute Beard ’290 Discloses Using
`Microchip To Control Activation Of The Indicator
`
`2
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 11:45-48
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`NO
`DISPUTE
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at Fig. 11
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 56, Resp. at 7-12
`
`55
`
`Ex. 1042-0055
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`PO Contends It Would Not Have Been Obvious
`To Combine These Features In The Same Microchip
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Resp. at 10-12
`
`56
`
`Ex. 1042-0056
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`Beard ’290 And Danielson Both Describe Starting Device Only If
`Sufficient Power Is Available, But Danielson Provides More Detail
`
`POSITA needed only to use more detailed startup procedures from Danielson
`in the control circuit 223 of Beard ’290
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1003 (Beard Decl.) at ¶250-254
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 11:67-12:4
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 53-56, Rep. at 2-3
`
`57
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1007 (Danielson), Fig. 22 (excerpt)
`
`Ex. 1042-0057
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`Obvious To Combine Features
`From Two Microchips Into One Microchip
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 7:44-48
`
`Beard, Petitioners’ Expert
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 49, 55-56, Rep. at 2-3
`
`58
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1003 (Beard Decl.) at ¶255
`
`Ex. 1042-0058

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket