`
`Apple Inc., et al.,
`Petitioners
`v.
`Global Touch Solutions, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`IPR2015-01171 (U.S. Patent No. 7,994,726 B2)*
`IPR2015-01172 (U.S. Patent No. 7,498,749 B2)**
`IPR2015-01603 (U.S. Patent No. 7,498,749 B2)***
`IPR2015-01173 (U.S. Patent No. 7,329,970 B2)**
`IPR2015-01174 (U.S. Patent No. 7,781,980 B2)*
`IPR2015-01175 (U.S. Patent No. 8,288,952 B2)*
`
`Trial Hearing
`August 3, 2016
`
`* Petitioners Apple Inc.; Motorola Mobility, LLC
`** Petitioners Apple Inc.; Motorola Mobility, LLC; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
`*** Petitioners Apple Inc.; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
`
`1
`
`Ex. 1040-0001
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Overview
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`III. Undisputed Issues
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`2
`
`Ex. 1040-0002
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`The Patents Are Directed To Portable Electronic
`Devices With Touch Sensors And Exhaustible Power Sources
`
`Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 4
`
`3
`
`Ex. 1040-0003
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`The Patents Are Directed To Portable Electronic
`Devices With Touch Sensors And Exhaustible Power Sources
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Abstract
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Fig. 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Fig. 12
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 5-6, 29
`
`4
`
`Ex. 1040-0004
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`The Patents Are Directed To Portable Electronic
`Devices With Touch Sensors And Exhaustible Power Sources
`
`US 6,249,089
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001
`Continuation-in-part
`
`IPR2015-01172,
`IPR2015-01603 Ex. 1001
`
`US 7,443,101
`
`US 6,621,225
`
`US 6,650,066
`
`US 6,952,084
`
`US 7,336,037
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001
`US 6,984,900
`
`US 7,084,531
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1001
`
`IPR2015-01175 Ex. 1001
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 1
`
`5
`
`Continuation
`
`Continuation-in-part
`
`Ex. 1040-0005
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`The Patents Are Directed To Portable Electronic
`Devices With Touch Sensors And Exhaustible Power Sources
`
`US 6,249,089
`
`Continuation-in-part
`
`US 6,621,225
`
`US 6,650,066
`
`US 6,952,084
`
`US 7,336,037
`
`US 7,443,101
`
`US 6,984,900
`
`US 7,084,531
`
`Continuation
`
`Continuation-in-part
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 1; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 1
`
`6
`
`Ex. 1040-0006
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`The Patents Are Directed To Portable Electronic
`Devices With Touch Sensors And Exhaustible Power Sources
`
`’726 Patent Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 28-36
`
`7
`
`Ex. 1040-0007
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Overview
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`III. Undisputed Issues
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`8
`
`Ex. 1040-0008
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`The Prior Art References
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`Beard ’290 Patent; IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent; IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1007
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`Rathmann ’869 Patent; IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1006
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 4; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 4; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 4; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 4; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 4; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 5
`
`9
`
`Ex. 1040-0009
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Beard ’290 Patent Discloses A Battery Pack And Terminal
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`battery pack
`
`battery powered
`electronic device
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 11, 31; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 10, 26; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 11, 29; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 11, 30;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 10, 29; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 13, 33
`
`10
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard), Fig. 8
`
`Ex. 1040-0010
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Beard ’290 Patent Discloses A Battery Pack And Terminal
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 9:16-33
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 12-13; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 11-12; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 12-13; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 12-13;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 11-12; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 14-15
`
`11
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard), Fig. 8
`
`Ex. 1040-0011
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Beard ’290 Patent Discloses A Battery Pack And Terminal
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`battery pack
`
`device
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard), Fig. 11
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 17, 31; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 19, 26; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 17, 29; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 17, 30;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 16, 29; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 18, 33
`
`12
`
`Ex. 1040-0012
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Beard ’290 Patent Discloses A Battery Pack And Terminal
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 12:59-65
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 11:45-48
`
`battery pack
`
`device
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard), Fig. 11
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 17, 31, Rep. at 15; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 19, 26, Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 17, 29, Rep. at 11;
`IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 17, 30, Rep. at 15; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 16, 29, Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 18, 33, Rep. at 20
`
`13
`
`Ex. 1040-0013
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Beard ’290 Patent Discloses A Battery Pack And Terminal
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171, Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 11:10-12
`
`IPR2015-01171, Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 11:67-12:4
`
`battery pack
`
`device
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard), Fig. 11
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 12, 30; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 11, 25; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 12, 30; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 12, 30;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 11, 28; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 14, 33
`
`14
`
`Ex. 1040-0014
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent Discloses More Detail About The Terminal
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1007 (Danielson), Fig. 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 17; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 17; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 17; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 16; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 17
`
`15
`
`Ex. 1040-0015
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`Rathmann ’869 Patent Discloses The Duracell Battery Operating System
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`Rathmann ’869 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1006 (Rathmann) at 5:48-58
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 16; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 16; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 16; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 16; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 15;
`IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 16
`
`16
`
`Ex. 1040-0016
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Overview
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`III. Undisputed Issues
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`17
`
`Ex. 1040-0017
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`III. Undisputed Issues
`
`No Dispute Re Prior Art Priority Dates
`
`No dispute Beard ’290 is prior art under at least
`35 U.S.C. § 102(e)
`
`No dispute Rathmann is prior art under at least
`35 U.S.C. § 102(e)
`
`No dispute Danielson is prior art under at least
`35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a) and 102(e)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 11, 14, 17; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 10, 13; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 13, 15, 17; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 11, 14, 17;
`IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 11, 14, 17; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 10, 13, 16
`
`18
`
`Ex. 1040-0018
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`III. Undisputed Issues
`
`Unrebutted Testimony Re Motivation To Combine
`
`Beard, Petitioners’ Expert
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`NO
`REBUTTAL
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1003 (Beard Decl.) at ¶¶95, 103
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 19-28; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 17-22; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 19-27; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 19-27; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 17-26;
`IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 21-28
`
`19
`
`Ex. 1040-0019
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Overview
`
`I. Brief Overview of the Patents
`
`II. Brief Overview of the Prior Art References
`
`III. Undisputed Issues
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`20
`
`Ex. 1040-0020
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`21
`
`Ex. 1040-0021
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`Argument
`
`’726 Patent
`IPR2015-01171
`
`’749 Patent
`IPR2015-01172
`
`’749 Patent
`IPR2015-01603
`
`’970 Patent
`IPR2015-01173
`
`’980 Patent
`IPR2015-01174
`
`’952 Patent
`IPR2015-01175
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`(4)
`
`(5)
`
`(6)
`
`(7)
`
`(8)
`
`Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not
`Disclose The Claimed “Energy
`Consuming Load”
`
`Beard And Rathmann In View Of
`Danielson Does Not Disclose Microchip
`Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming
`Load” And The Indicator
`
`Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not
`Disclose Deactivation Of A “Function”
`In Addition To The Visible Indicator
`
`Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not
`Disclose A Different Activation Signal For
`The Function
`
`Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not
`Disclose A Power Source Enclosed In The
`Product Housing
`
`Beard And Rathmann In View Of
`Danielson Does Not Disclose A Touch
`Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same
`User Interface
`
`Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not
`Disclose The Claimed “Location
`Indicator”
`
`Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not
`Disclose Activation Of A Visible
`Indication Without Activating Load
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`22
`
`Ex. 1040-0022
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`Patent Owner’s Consistent Errors
`
`Patent Owner impermissibly reads limitations from
`embodiments in the specification into the claims
`
`Patent Owner misreads the claim language to
`add new limitations not required by the claims
`
`Patent Owner misreads the plain disclosure of
`the prior art
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 2-10, 13-15, 18-25; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 2-12, 14-20; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 5-15; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 2-10, 13-24;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 2-10, 13-19, 20-22; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 2-12, 14-21
`
`23
`
`Ex. 1040-0023
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`24
`
`Ex. 1040-0024
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Claims Require “Energy Consuming Load”
`
`’726 Patent Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 28, Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 23, Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 31, Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 29, Rep. at 3;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 27, Rep. at 3
`
`25
`
`Ex. 1040-0025
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Plain Meaning Of “Energy Consuming Load” Undisputed
`
`Beard, Petitioners’ Expert
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1003 (Beard Decl.) at ¶116
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`A. Okay. So I believe that something could be
`an
`energy-consuming
`load
`whether,
`in
`general, whether it's under control of a
`micro or not. If it's a load and it consumes
`energy,
`it's
`an
`energy-consuming
`load,
`generically speaking, yes.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1036 (Morley Microsoft Tr.) at 102:1-5
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 8, Rep. at 3-4; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 9, Rep. at 4; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 9; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 8, Rep. at 3-4;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 8, Rep. at 4; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 10, Rep. at 4
`
`26
`
`Ex. 1040-0026
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO Argues Petitioners’ Construction Is Improperly Broad
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 25
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Resp. at 25; IPR2015-01172 Resp. at 12; IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 23; IPR2015-01175 Resp. at 31; IPR2015-01603 Resp. at 12
`
`27
`
`Ex. 1040-0027
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Patent Owner Admits That Beard ’290 Discloses
`“Energy Consuming Load” Under Plain And Ordinary Meaning
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`Q. So if the board does not adopt your
`construction of
`energy consuming
`load, but it views it as energy
`consuming component of the device,
`Beard would disclose that claim
`limitation, correct?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 170:2-7
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 12-13; -IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 10-12;
`IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 12-13
`
`28
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at Fig. 11
`
`Ex. 1040-0028
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Proposed Construction Should Be Rejected
`
`Term
`
`Petitioner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“Energy Consuming
`Load”
`
`plain meaning;
`
`(“any part of the product
`that consumes energy
`when the product is used”)
`
`“an energy-consuming
`component that receives
`power from the power
`source under the control
`of the microchip”
`
`The issue is whether the specification
`disclaims or deviates from the plain and ordinary meaning
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 8, Resp. at 20; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 9, Resp. at 12; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 9; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 8, Resp. at 20;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 8, Resp. at 31; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 10, Resp. at 11
`
`29
`
`Ex. 1040-0029
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Board Declined To Construe “Energy Consuming Load”
`
`Petition
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 3 (Petition) at 8
`
`Institution Decision
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 8, Inst. Dec. at 4; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 9, Inst. Dec. at 4; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 9, Inst. Dec. at 5;
`IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 8, Inst. Dec. at 5; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 8, Inst. Dec. at 4-5; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 10, Inst. Dec. at 5
`
`30
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper No. 8 (Inst. Dec.) at 4
`
`Ex. 1040-0030
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Claims Do Not Require Microchip To Control Power To The Load
`
`’726 Patent, Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`
`The claims do not require microchip to control power to the load
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 28, Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 23, Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 31, Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 29, Rep. at 3;
`IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 27, Rep. at 3
`
`31
`
`Ex. 1040-0031
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Claims Do Not Require Microchip To Control Power To The Load
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`Q. There’s nothing in the language of claim 1
`that requires the energy consuming load to
`receive
`power
`under
`the
`control
`of
`the
`microchip, is there?
`
`THE WITNESS: There is no specific mention of
`controlling that.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 91:22-93:7 (objection omitted)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 3
`
`32
`
`Ex. 1040-0032
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Features Found In Every Embodiment
`Should Still Not Be Read Into The Claims
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 19
`
`Thorner:
`
`“It is not enough for a patentee to simply disclose a single
`embodiment or use a word in the same manner
`in all
`embodiments, the patentee must ‘clearly express an intent’ to
`redefine the term.”
`
`Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, 669 F.3d 1362, 1365 (2012)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 6-7; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 5-6; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 5-6; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 6-7; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 6-7
`
`33
`
`Ex. 1040-0033
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO Attempts To Limit Claims To Specific Embodiments
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 16
`
`1) No mention
`nor definition
`of “energy
`consuming load”
`
`2) Does not
`say microchip
`controls power
`to load
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at 3:61-66
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 4-5; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 6; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 6; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 4-5; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 5
`
`34
`
`Ex. 1040-0034
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`’726 Patent Summary Of The Invention
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at 5:6
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at 3:61
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 4-5; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 6; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 6; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 4-5; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 5
`
`35
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at 4:47
`
`Ex. 1040-0035
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Support Does Not Describe
`Microchip Control Of Power To The Load
`
`PO’s Response
`
`This passage
`does not require
`the microchip to
`control power
`to the load
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 18
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 5; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 5; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 6
`
`36
`
`Ex. 1040-0036
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Support Describes Exemplary Embodiment In Fig. 2
`
`’726 Patent
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at 5:57-59
`
`This is not the
`“very character”
`of the invention
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at 7:12-31
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 5; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 5; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 6
`
`37
`
`Ex. 1040-0037
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Expert Testimony Should Be Given No Weight
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`1
`
`2 3 4
`
`A. To paraphrase that because, as you read it, it
`looked a little bit on the clumsy side, I
`would say that back to my -- I think I said
`this earlier -- what I think the patent
`teaches is an energy consuming load is a load
`whose
`power
`supply
`is
`controlled
`by
`the
`microchip. So there has to be a switch in
`series
`between
`the
`power
`supply,
`or
`exhaustible power supply if it's a battery --
`there's the switch that is controlled by the
`microchip,
`and
`then
`there's
`the
`load
`downstream so that in order for power to come
`from the power source and get to the load, it
`has
`to
`go
`through
`that
`switch
`that
`is
`controlled by the microchip.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035, “Morley Tr.” at 88:4-19
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 5-6; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 6; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 6
`
`38
`
`Ex. 1040-0038
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Applying PO’s Construction Consistently Would
`Add A Microchip To Claims That Do Not Require One
`
`Claim requires a microchip:
`
`Claim DOES NOT require a microchip:
`
`’726 Patent
`
`’749 Patent (sibling of the ’726 Patent)
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1041 ('749 Patent), Claim 21
`
`Applying PO’s construction to this
`claim would add a microchip that is
`nowhere in the claim language
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 10; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 3; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 10; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 10
`
`39
`
`Ex. 1040-0039
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`When Patentee Wished To Include A Requirement That
`The Microchip Control Power To The Load, It Did So
`
`’726 Patent
`
`’970 Patent (CIP sibling of the ’726 Patent)
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1037 ('970 Patent), Claim 52
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 7-8; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 9-10; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 9-10; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 7-8; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 8
`
`40
`
`Ex. 1040-0040
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Construction Contradicts Controlling Law
`
`’726 Patent
`
`’970 Patent (CIP sibling of the ’726 Patent)
`
`In re Rambus Inc.:
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`
`“[U]nless otherwise compelled the same
`claim term in the same patent or related patents
`carries the same construed meaning.”
`
`Ex. 1037 ('970 Patent), Claim 52
`
`In re Rambus Inc., 694 F.3d 42, 48 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (internal quotations and alterations omitted)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 8; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 9
`
`41
`
`Ex. 1040-0041
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO Avoids Construing
`“Energy Consuming Load” For The ’970 Patent
`
`’726 Patent
`
`’970 Patent (CIP sibling of the ’726 Patent)
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent), Claim 1
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“an energy-consuming component
`that receives power from the
`power source under the control
`of the microchip”
`
`Ex. 1037 ('970 Patent), Claim 52
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 20
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1039 (IPR2015-01173 PO Resp.)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 11; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 8-9
`
`42
`
`Ex. 1040-0042
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Applying PO’s Construction
`Consistently Would Make Claim 52 Redundant
`
`’970 Patent (CIP sibling of the ’726 Patent)
`
`component
`under
`the
`
`[energy-consuming
`that receives power from the power source
`control of the microchip]
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1037 ('970 Patent), Claim 52
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 9-10; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 11-12; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 11; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 9; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 9-10
`
`43
`
`Ex. 1040-0043
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Reliance On Alloc Is Misplaced
`
`Alloc:
`
`is impermissible to read the one and only
`“[I]t
`disclosed embodiment into a claim without other indicia
`that the patentee so intended to limit the invention.”
`
`Alloc, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, 342 F.3d 1361, 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
`
`Here:
`
`There is no ‘other indicia’ needed to limit the claims
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 7
`
`44
`
`Ex. 1040-0044
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Reliance On Alloc Is Misplaced
`
`Alloc:
`
`“The applicant expressly disavowed systems without
`play
`during
`prosecution
`of
`the
`parent
`’621
`application. See Middleton, 311 F.3d at 1388.”
`
`Alloc, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, 342 F.3d 1361, 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
`
`Here:
`
`PO points to no express disavowal during prosecution
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 7
`
`45
`
`Ex. 1040-0045
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Reliance On Alloc Is Misplaced
`
`Alloc:
`
`“Moreover, unlike the patent-at-issue in Sunrace, the
`'907 specification also distinguished the prior art on the
`basis of play. Id.”
`
`Alloc, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, 342 F.3d 1369IPR2015-01171 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
`
`Here:
`
`’726 Patent distinguishes the prior art based on
`“activating switch 102 does not conduct current to the load 105,”
`not based on the microchip controlling power to the load
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 7
`
`46
`
`Ex. 1040-0046
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`PO’s Reliance On Alloc Is Misplaced
`
`Alloc:
`
`the
`the ’907 specification indicates that
`“Here,
`invention is indeed exclusively directed toward flooring
`products including play.”
`
`Alloc, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, 342 F.3d 1369IPR2015-01171 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
`
`Here:
`
`’726 Patent indicates that the disclosure
`is only exemplary embodiments
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) at Abstract; 3:61-66; 4:12, 20, 30, 47, 56, 63;
`5:6, 16, 25, 34-35, 44-49, 57-59; 7:14, 18-23; 12:21-25
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 8-9; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 7; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 7
`
`47
`
`Ex. 1040-0047
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Even Under PO’s Incorrect Construction,
`Beard ’290 Discloses An “Energy Consuming Load”
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 11-12; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 12-14; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 12-14; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 11-12; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 10-12
`
`48
`
`Ex. 1040-0048
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Even Under PO’s Incorrect Construction,
`Beard ’290 Discloses An “Energy Consuming Load”
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“an energy-consuming
`component that receives
`power from the power
`source under the control
`of the microchip”
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 20
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 11-12; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 12-14; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 12-14; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 11-12; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 10-12
`
`49
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at Fig. 11
`
`Ex. 1040-0049
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Even Under PO’s Incorrect Construction,
`Beard ’290 Discloses An “Energy Consuming Load”
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`diagram,
`the
`along
`Continuing
`Q. Okay.
`there's
`beneath
`the
`control
`circuitry
`infrared
`interface
`circuitry
`and
`an
`Beard ’290 Patent
`transceiver that you mentioned a moment
`ago, right?
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“an energy-consuming
`component that receives
`power from the power
`source under the control
`of the microchip”
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 20
`
`those
`
`also
`
`consume
`
`energy,
`
`A. Yes.
`of
`Q. Both
`correct?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And then the interface circuitry would
`receive that power from the batteries,
`right?
`A. Correct.
`another
`is
`transceiver
`Q. The
`infrared
`component that would receive energy from
`the batteries?
`A. Yes.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 143:19-144:11
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 13; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 14; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 13-14; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 13; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 13
`
`50
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at Fig. 11
`
`Ex. 1040-0050
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (1)
`
`Even Under PO’s Incorrect Construction,
`Beard ’290 Discloses An “Energy Consuming Load”
`
`Beard, Petitioners’ Expert
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“an energy-consuming
`component that receives
`power from the power
`source under the control
`of the microchip”
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 20
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1034 (Beard Suppl. Decl.) at ¶6
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 13; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 14; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 14; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 13; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 13
`
`51
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at Fig. 11
`
`Ex. 1040-0051
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`52
`
`Ex. 1040-0052
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`’970 Patent Claim 52 Expressly Requires
`Microchip Control Of Power To Load In Addition To Indicator
`
`’970 Patent, Claim 52
`
`1
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001 ('970 Patent), Claim 52
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 48-58, Rep. at 2
`
`53
`
`Ex. 1040-0053
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`No Dispute Danielson Discloses Using
`Microchip To Control Power To The Load
`
`1
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1007 (Danielson) at 23:18-25
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`NO
`DISPUTE
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1007 (Danielson), Fig. 22 (excerpt)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 54-56, Resp. at 7-12
`
`54
`
`Ex. 1040-0054
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`No Dispute Beard ’290 Discloses Using
`Microchip To Control Activation Of The Indicator
`
`2
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 11:45-48
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`NO
`DISPUTE
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at Fig. 11
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 56, Resp. at 7-12
`
`55
`
`Ex. 1040-0055
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`PO Contends It Would Not Have Been Obvious
`To Combine These Features In The Same Microchip
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Resp. at 10-12
`
`56
`
`Ex. 1040-0056
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`Beard ’290 And Danielson Both Describe Starting Device Only If
`Sufficient Power Is Available, But Danielson Provides More Detail
`
`POSITA needed only to use more detailed startup procedures from Danielson
`in the control circuit 223 of Beard ’290
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1003 (Beard Decl.) at ¶250-254
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 11:67-12:4
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 53-56, Rep. at 2-3
`
`57
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1007 (Danielson), Fig. 22 (excerpt)
`
`Ex. 1040-0057
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (2)
`
`Obvious To Combine Features
`From Two Microchips Into One Microchip
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 7:44-48
`
`Beard, Petitioners’ Expert
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 49, 55-56, Rep. at 2-3
`
`58
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1003 (Beard Decl.) at ¶255
`
`Ex. 1040-0058