`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`________________
`
`APPLE INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, and
`TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`GLOBAL TOUCH SOLUTIONS, LLC
`Patent Owner
`________________
`
`Case IPR2015-01173
`Patent 7,329,970 B2
`________________
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s authorization via email of July 28, 2016, Patent
`
`Owner Global Touch Solutions, LLC, respectfully submits this Patent Owner’s
`
`Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Motion to Exclude (Paper 34) in accordance with
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.22.
`
`I. STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS (37 C.F.R. §42.22(a)(2))
`
`On June 30, 2016, the Board held a conference call with Patent Owner and
`
`Petitioners regarding Petitioners’ seeking permission to correct Petitioners’ Expert
`
`Declarations (Exhibit 1003 and 1035). During the call, Judge Shaw ruled that
`
`Petitioners would be allowed to file corrected expert declarations, adding only the
`
`inadvertently omitted penalty of perjury acknowledgement. Exhibit 1038 at 18:19-
`
`19:2. On July 3, 2016, Petitioner filed corrected Declarations of Paul Beard,
`
`Exhibit 1003 (Corrected) and Exhibit 1035 (Corrected).
`
`On July 11, 2016, Patent Owner filed a Motion to Exclude Exhibit 1003,
`
`Exhibit 1003 (Corrected), Exhibit 1035, and Exhibit 1035 (Corrected). (Paper 34).
`
`On July 13, 2016, Patent Owner filed with the Board a Patent Owner’s
`
`Request for Rehearing (Paper 35). On July 25, 2016, Patent Owner filed an
`
`Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Request for Rehearing (Paper 39), which was
`
`granted on July 26, 2016. (Paper 40).
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`II. STATEMENT OF RELIEF REQUESTED (37 C.F.R. §42.22(a)(1))
`
`Patent Owner hereby requests that the Motion to Exclude (Paper 34) filed in
`
`this matter on July 11, 2016, be withdrawn from consideration by the Board.
`
`The relief requested is warranted at least because Patent Owner does not
`
`wish to dedicate time for argument to or burden the Board with this issue. No harm
`
`to Petitioners will come from the Board’s granting of this unopposed Motion. And,
`
`Petitioners indicated that they do not oppose filing of this Motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/nathan cristler/
`Nathan Cristler
`Reg. No: 61,736
`Cristler IP, PLLC
`1801 21st Road North
`Arlington, Virginia 22209
`E-Mail: ncristler@cristlerip.com
`Tel: (512) 576-5166
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: July 29, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, I hereby certify that on this 29th Day of July,
`2016, the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
`WITHDRAW MOTION TO EXCLUDE, was served by e-mail on counsel for
`Petitioner:
`
`
`Robert Steinberg
`bob.steinberg@lw.com
`
`Matthew Moore
`matthew.moore@lw.com
`
`Gabriel Gross
`gabe.gross@lw.com
`
`James Bender
`james.bender@lw.com
`
`Doris Hines
`dori.hines@finnegan.com
`
`Luke McCammon
`luke.mccammon@finnegan.com
`
`DeAnna Allen
`dallen@cooley.com
`
`Phillip Morton
`pmorton@cooley.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/nathan cristler/
`Nathan Cristler
`Reg. No: 61,736
`
`
`
`4
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
