throbber
G. a U R TO N
`
`'
`'
`
`- laboratory of the Agricufl'ura! Research Council, Larkfield,
`.. .
`I 4 one. Kent. Engfand
`
`
`
`I. --_
`
`:- ‘T : I edit-ion
`
`. .
`
`'__'
`
`. lately rat-15:51}
`
`I
`
`:
`
`'VEENMAN & ZONEN N.v., WAGENINGEN, HOLLAND
`
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`Exhibit 1013
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 0001
`Page 0001
`
`

`

`ItJ-DEI kg pt-zatocs
`sprout control may he achieved with as little as lti g ClPt“ .-
`lil' growth.
`tSawyer. 1959]. Too low a concentration can lead to intern-.-
`Ifl' C
`t'. growth at
`3-5-5 rrt'nieri'rt-iftevun-l-ot' vapour will completely prevent
`at a concentration oi {Ll tttg perl ofair. an ctcht discovered and .. _I,t-'tied cotttittereially
`by Burton .. see e.g. Burton t'l'ilfiha. l958a. ct. The substance. :1 liquid sold as "nona-
`not" with .t E.P. ol‘c.
`I‘Jsl-"CT. specific gravity [Ill "4'! 0.323. cannot he introduced
`among the potatoes and allowed to evaporate slowly as can the solids described
`above. The concentration needed is
`tnttch higher. and the necessary high initial
`concentration of nonaitol vt ould he tosie to the tuhers.The method usually adopted
`is to ventilate the potatoes. after the t'fltial period of wound healing. with air contai-
`ning the required concentration of nonanol vapour. the liquid heittg usually vaporized
`hy causing it to drip on to a ltot plate in the air stream. though towelling soaked with
`it. or the'o'thtatcd hatits of it. have ttlso been used as a ntearts of introduction- in
`connecti
`'il‘t the last-mentioned methodofintroduction. the following approsimate
`figures to
`: tapour pressure of nonanol tmm Hg: at various temperatures may he
`of use:— Illtl a. EU: 12ft". ht): HIT. Hill;
`lol'l'. 23H:
`IHll'. fiIitl: Pill)". 1’20. The latent
`heat of vupnrisation. at Tot] mm Hg.
`is 112.5 calsg. Because the vapour tn the air
`stream blows to 1waste after passing through the potatoes.
`the rate of ventilation
`should he as low as possible to avoid tltis waste hetng esccsstve. but at very low
`rates the nonnnol that he diluted below the effective concentration hy air drawn into
`the stack by convection. The hest rate of ventilation itt practice is therefore about
`3—9 mi't-hr. hlttelt above this is wasteful and therefore cspensive: much below can
`he inctl‘ective. Honanot does not prevent the hfL‘i'lh. of dormancy. httt kills the young
`sprouts as soon as they appear. There is tlten a period of two or more weeks before
`growth starts again. it is therefore possible to use nonanol fumigation intermittently.
`allowing a period of two weeks or so between tlte end of one period offttotigation and
`the beginning of tltc nest. The duration ol‘cach period of fumigation should he suffi-
`cient to kill any young sprouts. In practice a period of two weeks is often adopted.
`and a simple regime of treatment is therefore to allow a period to elapse after harvest
`for wound healing. and the It commence fumigation for equal periods of two weeks
`on and two weeks oi’t' until the potatoes are removed front store. the cost heing thtts
`related to the duration of storage. 1|t’tr'ith such a regime the consumption of nonanol
`is at a rate of about sec g per ltJCtl ltg potatoes for every ntonth of storage after the
`start of treatment. There is neither necessity nor advantage in starting the treatment
`hefore sprouting starts. hat the ahove routine avoids the need of determining when
`sprouting has started. which is not always easy in a bulk store. ll. through failure to
`observe the earliest stages of growth. sprouting has become well advanced before the
`application of nonanoi.
`the lstlletl sprouts may die hack into the tuher flesh. with
`resultant hicntisltcs and possibly rotting.
`Nonanol has been used successfully as a sprout suppressant for potatoes stored in
`crates. .fits soon as the lirst signs of sprout growth are visible ti.c. sprouts up to 2 ntm
`long]. the alcohol is evaporated into the store air. which is continuously rc-cireulated
`at the normal rate ofc. tore mi’ltfhr. front a commercial unit delivering c. it maitihr
`of air containing 0.] g nonanolh‘n”. The concentration of nonanol is at first much less
`than that necessary to control sprouting. hut in a closed state in which the air is
`
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1.4 Giétfup, INC.
`Exhibit 1013
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 0002
`Page 0002
`
`

`

`re-eiretitated it builds-up to the required level. Treatment is discontinued when the
`tips of the sprouts are seen to be dead, and re-eommeneed when growth re-starts.
`Man-fie hydra-cafe provides an exception to the other chemical inhibitors in that it is
`the only one. which has been accepted on the commercial scale. tshiveh is applied to
`the Foliage before harvest. It is Usually applied. in the form of the water soluble
`diethanolamine- or sodium-salt. at a rate ot‘ 2.5 kgfha by means of a high volume
`sprayer delivering {0004500 llr'ha. if applied less than 3 weeks before the death of
`the Foliage. inhibition may not be completely.r effective; if more than 5 weeks before.
`yield may be adversely affected and some of the tubers be mis-shapen — though
`this depends upon the bulking behaviour of the 1variety.
`In some varieties. which
`bulk late in the foliage lil'e. it
`is difficult to avoid some loss of yield iF sprouting is
`to be inhibited. Nevertheless. with other varieties. and in localities where Fairly.r eritieal
`timing of a spraying programme is possible. maleie hydrazide is eapabie of giving
`very good control of sprout growth.
`
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`Exhibit 1013
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 0003
`Page 0003
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket