throbber
US 20090062126A1
`
`(19) United States
`(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0062126 A1
`Knowles et al.
`(43) Pub. Date:
`Mar. 5, 2009
`
`
`(54) USE OF C3 TO C14 ALIPHATIC ALDEHYDES,
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Aug. 6, 2008
`
`KETONES AND PRIMARY AND SECONDARY
`C3 TO C7 ALIPHATIC ALCOHOLS TO
`
`Related U_S_ Application Data
`
`INHIBIT SPROUTING 0F POTATO TUBERS
`
`(76)
`
`Inventors:
`
`Norman Richard Knowles,
`Pullman, WA (US); Lisa O’Rear
`Knowles, Pullman, WA (US)
`
`Correspondence Address:
`351(1):??? CURTIS & CHRISTOFFERSON &
`11491 SUNSET HILLS ROAD, SUITE 340
`RESTON: VA 20190 (US)
`
`(21) Appl. No.:
`
`12/186,861
`
`3000
`
`(60)
`
`Il’govziggnal application No. 60/955,156, filed on Aug.
`Publication Classification
`
`(51)
`
`Int Cl
`A01N '35/02
`(2006 01)
`A01N 31/02
`(200601)
`G01N 33/64
`(2006.01)
`G01N 33/98
`(2006.01)
`A 01p 21/00
`(2006.01)
`(52) US. Cl. .......... 504/348; 504/353; 436/128; 436/131
`(57)
`ABSTRACT
`Compositions and methods for inhibiting the sprouting of
`potato tubers are provided. The compositions comprise C3 to
`C14 aliphatic aldehydes and ketones, and/or C3 to C7 pri-
`mary and secondary aliphatic alcohols.
`
`2500
`
`2000
`
`.4; 01 C)O
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`freshwt)
`
`
`TuberResidue(ng/g
`
`+ 2-nonanone
`
`—V— 2-nonanol
`—l—~ 3~nonen-2—one
`
`-5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Days after application
`
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`Exhibit 1006
`Exhibit 1006
`Page 0001
`Page 0001
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Mar. 5, 2009 Sheet 1 0f 4
`
`US 2009/0062126 A1
`
`Figure1
`
`(D
`
`COC(
`
`UC0 gN
`
`—I-—3-nonen-2-0ne
`
`—‘F—2-nonanol
`
`
`
`
`
`Daysafterapplication
`
`3000
`
`2500
`
`1500
`
`2000
`1000
`(W LISGJJ B/Bu) anpgseg JeqnJ.
`
`500
`
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`Exhibit 1006
`Exhibit 1006
`Page 0002
`Page 0002
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Mar. 5, 2009 Sheet 2 0f 4
`
`US 2009/0062126 A1
`
`Figure2
`
`6I
`‘—
`
`I C Q
`
`)COCI
`
`+5..
`
`1-nonanol+t-2—nonenal
`—-I—-—
`
`
`
`—‘F-nonanal
`
`
`
`
`
`Daysafterapplication
`
`1600
`
`1400
`
`1200
`
`1000
`
`800
`
`400
`
`400
`
`200
`
`(MA use-u; B/Bu) enpgsaa JeqnJ.
`
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`Exhibit 1006
`Exhibit 1006
`Page 0003
`Page 0003
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Mar. 5, 2009 Sheet 3 0f 4
`
`US 2009/0062126 A1
`
`m
`C (D C
`(D o c o
`c c o c:
`0 cu c:
`cu
`: c: m C
`co 0 c o
`C q o 1:
`C I
`ON I N
`:5 Lo N L0
`N N L0. "2
`O O O O
`
`L0
`E\.
`0
`
`5
`
`H
`
`.
`
`A
`
`g
`
`u A
`
`“’-
`
`3’
`
`: 3
`
` a.)
`
`C) 2
`G)
`0
`E K
`E 3
`m v (33
`mm L0 % .I‘— C\! :0 LL
`
`
`
`0
`
`QIQEQEXQIQESQEZ‘KQXKXQZQQI!
`WIIIIIIJMMII 8
`mmmm 0'
`
`O
`N
`v-
`
`O
`O
`r“-
`
`O
`CD
`
`O
`(0
`
`O
`‘3‘
`
`O
`N
`
`C)
`
`(JOJlUOO i0 %) 1M qseu; mmds
`
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`Exhibit 1006
`Exhibit 1006
`Page 0004
`Page 0004
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Mar. 5, 2009 Sheet 4 of 4
`
`US 2009/0062126 A1
`
`
`
`UwzqamgmeEfimt.
`
`#3
`
`v:
`
`mmvmmmo
`
`EmEummbREEEtaQED
`
`w$39k
`
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`Exhibit 1006
`Exhibit 1006
`Page 0005
`Page 0005
`
`ooeovm
`
`C)
`
`Or
`
`.
`
`V'N1--1--
`
`(D
`r-
`
`(Jeqm/B) 1M useJ; moms
`
`{OI «mmwfim
`
`_oé-cmxmr_-m-wcm:
`
`
`
`_ocmfimc-m-.b-.
`
`
`
`m:ocmomn-m......l
`
`
`
`_O.3.COU+.mcmomoIOI
`
`Lm_E®.__n_
`
`

`

`US 2009/0062126 A1
`
`Mar. 5, 2009
`
`USE OF C3 TO C14 ALIPHATIC ALDEHYDES,
`KETONES AND PRIMARY AND SECONDARY
`C3 TO C7 ALIPHATIC ALCOHOLS TO
`INHIBIT SPROUTING OF POTATO TUBERS
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`[0001] This application claims benefit of US. provisional
`patent application 60/955,156, filed Aug. 10, 2007, the com-
`plete contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`[0002]
`[0003] The invention generally relates to using C3 to C14
`aliphatic aldehydes and ketones, and C3 to C7 aliphatic pri-
`mary and secondary alcohols to inhibit sprouting when
`applied to potato tubers.
`[0004]
`2. Background of the Invention
`[0005]
`Following harvest, potato tubers undergo a natural
`period of dormancy during which sprout growth is inhibited
`by endogenous hormones. As tubers emerge from dormancy
`and begin to sprout, respiration increases, starch is catabo-
`lized to sugars, and weight loss increases. The result is a
`decrease in quality oftubers destined for fresh and processing
`markets. Hence, inhibition of sprouting through chemical or
`physical means preserves quality and prolongs the duration of
`storage.
`[0006] The sprout inhibitors registered for use on potatoes
`in the United States are CIPC (also known as chlorpropham,
`Sprout Nip®, etc.), maleic hydrazide (MH), DMN (also
`known as dimethylnaphthalene, 1,4SIGHT®, 1,4SEED®,
`1,4SHIP®), DIPN (diisopropylnaphthalene, Amplify®), and
`clove oil (Biox-C®; Sprout TorchTM). Except for MH, which
`is applied pre-harvest to actively growing plants, all inhibitors
`are applied post harvest when tubers are in the storage bin.
`[0007] CIPC is the most effective and most widely used
`potato sprout inhibitor. The chemical is most often applied as
`a thermal aerosol fog into potato storages after wound-heal-
`ing and prior to sprouting. In the Pacific Northwest, this is
`usually in November or December, before dormancy has
`ended. The chemical is fogged into storage at the recom-
`mended rate of 1 lb chlorpropham/600 cwt. One gallon of
`CIPC aerosol grade will treat 4200 cwt (210 tons) ofpotatoes.
`CIPC can inhibit sprouting and extend the storage life of
`table-stock and processing potatoes for up to 1 year with two
`applications.
`[0008] CIPC is an effective sprout suppressant that has
`been used in the potato industry for about 40 years and the
`EPA considers it as a group E chemical (non-carcinogenic).
`CIPC was originally registered in the United States as a pre-
`and post-emergence herbicide in 1962 and the EPA has set
`residue limits for potato tubers. Notwithstanding its safety
`record, the trend today is to reduce the use of synthetic pes-
`ticides in agriculture in order to reduce residues in the world’s
`food supply. The chemical is continually being scrutinized by
`the EPA as it is among the three pesticides found in the highest
`concentrations in the average American diet (Gartrell, M. J .,
`J. C. Craun, D. S. Podrebarac, and E. L. Gunderson. 1986.
`Pesticides, selected elements, and other chemicals in adult
`total diet samples October 1980-March 1982. J. Assoc. Off.
`Anal. Chem. 69:146-161). CIPC constitutes over 90% of the
`total synthetic residues found in US. potatoes (Gartrell et al.,
`1986). The EPA recently issued a re-registration eligibility
`
`decision for CIPC and dropped the tolerance level for resi-
`dues on potatoes. The economic importance of this chemical
`as a sprout inhibitor to the potato industry is illustrated by the
`fact that the registrants spent over $6,000,000 in this re-
`registration process. While other potential sprout suppres-
`sants have been identified (e. g. aromatic aldehydes and alco-
`hols, methylesters ofrape oil, carvone, jasmonates, spearmint
`and peppermint oils), none appear as effective as CIPC. A
`need thus exists to identify and develop the most benign
`chemicals possible (ideally natural, phytochemicals) that are
`effective as sprout inhibitors.
`[0009]
`1,4SIGHT® (94.7% DMN:1,4-dimethylnaphtha-
`lene) is one such natural chemical that is also registered for
`sprout control, but it tends to be less effective than CIPC.
`DMN is naturally produced in potatoes. It is more volatile
`than CIPC and thus dissipates from tubers more rapidly than
`CIPC. Multiple applications ofDMN are required to maintain
`season-long sprout inhibition. DMN is vaporized and applied
`as an aerosol into bulk storages. It can be applied any time
`after tubers are placed in the bin but is usually applied later in
`the fall or early winter when sprouting potential begins to
`increase. DMN is registered for use at a rate of 1 lb DMN/500
`cwt (:20 ppm on a DMN to potato weight basis). Because of
`the need for multiple applications of DMN to achieve pro-
`longed inhibition of sprouting, DMN is more costly to use
`than CIPC.
`
`[0010] Other natural volatile sprout inhibitors have been
`identified. Carvone (derived from caraway seed) is commer-
`cially available for use on potatoes in the Netherlands (Hart-
`mans, K. J., P. Diepenhorst, W. Bakker and L. G. M. Gorris.
`1995. The use of carvone in agricultureisprout suppression
`of potatoes and antifungal activity against potato-tuber and
`other plant-diseases. Industrial Crops and Products 423-13).
`The following US patents describe the use of various com-
`pounds for the inhibition ofpotato sprout formation: US. Pat.
`No. 5,436,226 to Lulai, et al. (Jul. 25, 1995) describes the use
`ofjasmonates; US. Pat. No. 5,580,596 to Winkelmann et al.
`(Dec. 3, 1996) describes the use of rape oil and certain long-
`chain alcohols, either alone or in combination; US. Pat. No.
`5,139,562 to Vaughn et al., (Aug. 16, 1992) describes the use
`of volatile monoterpenes (e. g. from eucalyptus, peppermint,
`spearmint, etc.), and US. Pat. No. 5,129,951 to Vaughn et al.,
`(Jul. 14, 1992) describes the use of aromatic aldehydes and
`alcohols. In addition, Vokou et al. (1993) have demonstrated
`that the essential oils from a multitude of herbs (e. g. sage and
`rosemary) possess sprout inhibiting activity in potatoes.
`[0011] There remains an ongoing need to provide altema-
`tive sprout inhibitors that are safe and effective, particularly
`sprout inhibitors that are natural compounds, and that do not
`pose a threat to the environment or to the health of humans
`and other species.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`[0012] A novel method for inhibiting (e.g. preventing, fore-
`stalling, slowing, reversing, or otherwise hindering) the
`development of sprouts in potato tubers is provided. The
`method includes the step of exposing potato tubers to one or
`more C3 to C14 aliphatic aldehydes or ketones, and/or to C3
`to C7 aliphatic primary or secondary alcohols to inhibit
`sprouting ofthe tubers. Examples of such compounds include
`2-nonanone, nonanal, 2-heptanol, and trans-2-hepten-1-ol
`and analogous aliphatic compounds of 3 to 14-carbons in the
`case of aldehydes and ketones, or 3 to 7 carbons in the case of
`primary or secondary alcohols.
`
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`Exhibit 1006
`Exhibit 1006
`Page 0006
`Page 0006
`
`

`

`US 2009/0062126 A1
`
`Mar. 5, 2009
`
`[0020] Aliphatic C3 to C14 aldehydes that may be used in
`the practice of the invention generally have the chemical
`formula
`
`0 C
`
`Rl/ \H
`
`[0021] where R1 is a C2 to C13 branched or unbranched,
`substituted or unsubstituted saturated alkyl or a C2 to C13
`branched or unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted unsat-
`urated alkenyl. In some embodiments of the invention, the
`aldehyde is nonanal,
`
`0 f
`
`l
`VVW \ H
`
`[0013] The compounds may be applied directly to potato
`tubers. Alternatively, the compounds may be derived from the
`breakdown of C3 to C14 (x,[3-unsaturated aldehydes and
`ketones such as those described in US. Pat. No. 6,855,699 to
`Knowles et al. (Feb. 15, 2005). US. Pat. No. 6,855,699
`describes the use of C3 to C14 (x,[3-unsaturated aldehydes and
`ketones, many of which are naturally produced in fruits and
`vegetables, to inhibit the sprouting ofpotato tubers. However,
`it has been discovered that the breakdown products of these
`C3 to C14 (x,[3-unsaturated aldehydes and ketones, including
`the compounds described herein, are also useful for this pur-
`pose.
`
`the invention provides methods for
`In addition,
`[0014]
`detecting the appearance of the metabolites of C3 to C14
`(x,[3-unsaturated aldehydes and ketones in or on potato tubers
`to which they have been applied. Such methods involve mea-
`suring an amount or level of C3 to C14 aliphatic aldehydes or
`ketones, and/or C3 to C14 aliphatic primary or secondary
`alcohols,
`in order to track or monitor the breakdown or
`catabolism of the C3 to C14 (x,[3-unsaturated aldehydes and
`ketones.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`or decanal,
`
`FIG. 1. Levels of 3-nonen-2-one, 2-nonanone, and
`[0015]
`2-nonanol
`in tubers initially treated with 0.75 mmol/kg
`3-nonen-2-one and stored at 9° C. Content of residues in the
`outer 20 mm of tuber.
`
`FIG. 2. Levels of trans-2-nonenal, nonanal, trans -2-
`[0016]
`nonen-1 -ol and 1-nonanol in tubers initially treated with 0.75
`mmol/kg trans-2-nonenal and stored at 9° C. Content of resi-
`dues in the outer 20 mm of tuber.
`
`FIG. 3. Effects of 3-nonen-2-one (3N2) in various
`[0017]
`combinations with 2-nonanone on sprouting of Russet Bur-
`bank tubers. The compounds were applied as described in
`Example 1. Tubers were treated for 24 h, removed from
`treatment chambers, and placed at 22° C. to sprout for 3
`weeks. Sprout fresh weight is expressed as a percentage of
`control (non-treated), which were 100% sprouted.
`[0018]
`FIG. 4. Effect of trans-2-hexen-1-ol, 2-heptanol,
`decanal and 3-decanone on sprouting in Premier Russet
`tubers during long term storage at 9° C. Compounds were
`initially applied 98 days after harvest to tubers which had
`emerged from dormancy and displayed small
`(<3 mm)
`sprouts.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
`
`[0019] The present invention is based on the discovery that
`C3 to C14 aliphatic aldehydes and ketones, and/or C3 to C7
`aliphatic primary and secondary alcohols, function to inhibit
`the development of potato sprouts. These compounds have
`been identified as metabolites ofthe previously known potato
`tuber sprout inhibitors C3 to C14 (x,[3-unsaturated aldehydes
`and ketones, and have certain advantages in terms of produc-
`tion, use and performance. Many of the compounds offer the
`advantage of being naturally occurring and thus relatively
`safe and nontoxic to use. These compounds may be used
`alone or in combination with each other, or in combination
`with other known tuber sprout inhibitors, pesticides and
`growth regulators.
`
`WVWO'
`
`[0022] Aliphatic C3 to C14 ketones that may be used in the
`practice ofthe invention generally have the chemical formula
`
`where R2 is a C1 to C12 branched or unbranched, substituted
`or unsubstituted saturated alkyl or a C1 to C12 branched or
`unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted unsaturated alkenyl,
`and R3 is a C1 to C12 branched or unbranched, substituted or
`unsubstituted saturated alkyl or a C1 to C12 branched or
`unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted unsaturated alkenyl.
`R2 and R3 may be the same or different. In some embodiments
`of the invention, the ketone is 2-nonanone,
`
`War
`
`3
`
`or 3 -decanone,
`
`W'
`
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`Exhibit 1006
`Exhibit 1006
`Page 0007
`Page 0007
`
`

`

`US 2009/0062126 A1
`
`Mar. 5, 2009
`
`[0023] Aliphatic C3 to C7 primary alcohols that may be
`used in the practice ofthe invention generally have the chemi-
`cal formula
`
`OH
`
`A.
`
`R4
`
`where R4 is a C2 to C6 branched or unbranched, substituted or
`unsubstituted saturated alkyl or a C2 to C6 branched or
`unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted unsaturated alkenyl.
`In various embodiments of the invention, the unsaturated C3
`to C7 primary alcohol is
`[0024]
`l-hexanol,
`
`\/\/\/OH
`
`[0025]
`
`l-heptanol,
`
`/\/\/\/OH
`
`[0026]
`
`trans -2 -hexen-l -ol,
`
`\/\/\/OH °r
`
`[0027]
`
`trans -2 -hepten- 1 -ol,
`
`/\/\/\/0H'
`
`[0028] The aliphatic C3 to C7 secondary alcohols that may
`be used in the practice ofthe present invention generally have
`the chemical formula
`
`where R5 is a C1 to C5 branched or unbranched, substituted or
`unsubstituted saturated alkyl or a C1 to C5 branched or
`unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted unsaturated alkenyl.
`R6 is a C1 to C5 branched or unbranched, substituted or
`unsubstituted saturated alkyl or a C1 to C5 branched or
`unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted unsaturated alkenyl.
`R5 and R6 may be the same or different. In one embodiment of
`the invention, the saturated C3 to C7 secondary alcohol is
`2-heptanol,
`
`OH
`
`W.
`
`[0029] Examples of additional compounds that may be
`used in the practice ofthe invention include but are not limited
`to the following:
`[0030] Aliphatic C3 to C14 aldehydes that may be used in
`the practice of the present invention include but are not lim-
`ited to: propanal, butanal, pentanal, hexanal, heptanal, octa-
`nal, 4-nonenal, 6-nonenal, decanal, undecanal, dodecanal,
`tridecanal, and tetradecanal.
`[0031] Aliphatic C3 to C14 ketones that may be used in the
`practice ofthe present invention include but are not limited to:
`propanone, 2-butanone, 2-pentanone, 2-hexanone, 2-hep-
`tanone, 2-octanone, 3-octanone, 3-nonanone, 2-decanone,
`3-decanone, 2-undecanone, 2-dodecanone, 2-tridecanone,
`and 2-tetradecanone.
`
`[0032] Aliphatic C3 to C7 primary alcohols that may be
`used in the practice of the present invention include but are
`not limited to: l-propanol, l-butanol, 2-buten-l-ol, l-pen-
`tanol, 2-penten-l-ol,
`l-hexanol, 2-hexen-l-ol, and l-hep-
`tanol.
`
`[0033] Aliphatic C3 to C7 secondary alcohols that may be
`used in the practice of the present invention include but are
`not limited to: 2-propanol, 2-butanol, 2-pentanol, and 2-hex-
`anol.
`
`[0034] By “substituted” we mean the replacement of
`hydrogen with a monovalent or divalent radical. Suitable
`substitution groups include but are not
`limited to,
`for
`example, hydroxyl, nitro, amino, imino, cyano, halo, thio,
`thioamido, amidino, imidino, oxo, oxamidino, methoxami-
`dino, guanidino, sulfonamido, carboxyl, formyl, lower alkyl,
`halo-lower alkyl,
`lower alkoxy, halo-lower alkoxy,
`lower
`alkoxyalkyl, alkylcarbonyl, cycloalkyl, heterocycloalkyl,
`alkylthio, aminoalkyl, cyanoalkyl, and the like.
`[0035] The application of sprout inhibiting compounds to
`potato tubers is generally known to those of skill in the art.
`The treatment of potato tubers is described, for example, in
`US. Pat. No. 6,855,669 (Knowles et al.), the complete con-
`tents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Appli-
`cation is typically to bulk potatoes in storage bins, although
`this need not be the case as the compounds may be applied to
`potatoes stored or sorted in any manner, so long as sufficient
`contact is made between the compounds and the potato tubers
`to inhibit sprouting. Application of the compounds to the
`potatoes may be carried out by any of several methods. Gen-
`erally, the compound(s) will be volatilized, e. g. by cold fog-
`ging, or at high temperature to create a thermal fog, or by
`atomization, and introduced into storage bins e.g. via the
`ventilation system. This introduction may be a discrete event
`that is carried out once or multiple times throughout the
`storage period. Alternatively, a slow-release mechanism or
`formulation may be employed in which the compound gradu-
`ally enters the storage area over a longer period of time, for
`example by evaporation from a source impregnated with the
`compound(s). Further, the compounds may also be advanta-
`geously applied by spraying or misting a liquid form of the
`compound onto the potatoes, or by dipping or otherwise
`coating the potatoes with the compound, either prior to, dur-
`ing, or after the potatoes are stored (e.g. between storage and
`boxing or bagging for commercial purposes). Such com-
`pounds can also be used to coat or impregnate consumer
`containers (such as cardboardboxes, burlap bags, plastic bags
`etc) which typically hold potatoes coming out of storage
`sheds or bins for the express purpose of making available the
`precursor or metabolite compounds to delay sprouting in
`transit and at final destinations (e.g. homes, grocery stores,
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`Exhibit 1006
`Exhibit 1006
`Page 0008
`Page 0008
`
`

`

`US 2009/0062126 A1
`
`Mar. 5, 2009
`
`restaurants and other food establishments). For such applica-
`tions, the compounds may also be mixed with various other
`agents known to facilitate the delivery of gases. liquids, or
`gels as appropriate (e.g. emulsifiers, slow release agents or
`matrices and the like).
`[0036] The timing of exposure of the potatoes to the com-
`pounds of the invention can be prior to or after emergence
`from dormancy.
`[0037] The application of the compounds may be carried
`out only once as described above (i.e. early in the storage of
`the potatoes). Alternatively, depending on the factors such as
`the cultivar, the time of harvest of the potatoes, the length of
`storage of the potatoes, the fate of the potatoes, etc. multiple
`applications of the compounds may be made. For example, if
`the potatoes are to be used as seed potatoes, only one appli-
`cation may be necessary as the eventual sprouting of the
`potatoes will be desirable. However, if the potatoes are to be
`stored long term (e. g. over the entire winter for distribution in
`the spring or the following summer) multiple applications
`may be made. In this case, the first application will generally
`be made early in the storage process (e. g. at between 4 and 32
`weeks following harvest), and subsequent applications may
`also be made at roughly 4 to 12 week intervals as needed, until
`the potatoes are retrieved for use.
`[0038] The amount of compound (or compounds) that is
`applied is sufficient to terminate, slow, prevent, and/or inhibit
`sprout growth on the potato tubers. The development of
`sprouts may thus be prevented altogether, or the onset of
`sprouting may be delayed, or existing sprouts may be killed,
`or the development of sprouts may be slowed compared to
`untreated tubers, etc. In any case, the process of sprouting is,
`in general, inhibited by treating the potato tubers with the
`compounds as described herein, or with their precursor com-
`pounds (e.g. see U.S. Pat. No. 6,855,669, for examples of
`precursor (x,[3-unsaturated aldehydes and ketones which can
`be used to make the ketones and aldehydes and alcohols of
`this invention), in comparison to potato tubers that are not
`exposed to or contacted by the compounds in a similar man-
`ner. In general, such inhibition will result in a decrease in the
`number, length, or fresh weight of sprouts developing on the
`tubers, and/or a decrease in the rate of growth (as determined
`by length, number, and/or weight) of sprouts that develop on
`the treated tubers, in comparison to potato tubers that are not
`exposed to or contacted by the compounds. The decrease will
`be in the range of at least about 10 to 100%, preferably in the
`range of about 50 to 100%, and most preferably in the range
`of about 75 to 100%. Thus, the treated tubers will display a
`decrease in sprout development of about 10, 20, 30, 40, 50,
`60, 70, 80 90, or 100%, compared to untreated tubers.
`[0039] The amount of a compound (or mixture of com-
`pounds) that is used to inhibit sprouting according to the
`invention may vary from situation to situation. However, the
`amount will generally be in the range of from about 0.1
`mmol/kg tuber fresh weight to about 3 .0 mmol/kg tuber fresh
`wt
`
`[0040] According to the present invention, the compounds
`of the invention may be applied directly, or they may arise
`indirectly as metabolites from the application of precursor
`compounds such as, but not limited to, those described herein
`and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,855,669. The compounds ofthe inven-
`tion may also be derived from the application ofa formulation
`of an inactive chemically related species which is released as
`an active form upon application to tubers. Examples of this
`chemistry are an acetal or hemiacetal ofthe active aldehyde or
`
`the ketal or hemiketal of the active ketone. The compounds
`may be applied in combination with other agents used to treat
`potatoes, examples of which include but are not limited to
`other substances that also inhibit sprouting. In this case, the
`use of the compounds of the present invention may allow the
`use of less of another substance whose use is less desirable
`
`is more
`(e.g. a substance that is not naturally occurring,
`expensive, toxic, etc). Such combinations may also allow the
`use of lower doses ofthe compounds ofthe present invention.
`[0041] The preparation of the compounds for use in the
`practice of the present invention is known to those of skill in
`the art. Many of the compounds are commercially available.
`Others may be synthesized by well-known methods. Still
`others may be isolated from natural sources, e.g. from pota-
`toes or other plants in which they are naturally produced, or in
`which their precursors are produced. Alternatively, the com-
`pounds may be produced in plants or other organisms that
`have been genetically engineered to overproduce the com-
`pounds. One advantage ofthe method ofthe present invention
`is that some of the compounds that are used in the method
`may be relatively inexpensive to procure, or can be expected
`to arise from the metabolism of relatively inexpensive 0t,[3-
`unsaturated carbonyls that have been applied to potato tubers,
`and thus may offer an advantage when compared to more
`costly alternatives.
`[0042] The invention includes methods for determining
`whether potato tubers have been previously exposed to C3 to
`C14 (x,[3-unsaturated aldehydes or ketones. The detection of
`prior exposure is important in identifying tubers treated with
`unregistered or illegally applied 0t,[3 unsaturated carbonyls
`that yield metabolites (for example C8-C14 alcohols). Such
`methods generally involve monitoring the conversion of C3
`to C14 (x,[3-unsaturated aldehydes and C4 to C14 (x,[3-unsat-
`urated ketones by detecting metabolites produced by the
`breakdown ofthese sub stances. The precursor compounds for
`which metabolites are of interest include those disclosed in
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,855,699. Such breakdown products occur
`regardless of the method of application of the precursor (e.g.
`cold fogging, thermal fogging, direct spray, slow release
`matrices, etc.). The precursors are applied in an amount suf-
`ficient to achieve or generate an inhibitory amount ofmetabo-
`lites.
`
`[0043] Representative precursor C3 to C14 unsaturated ali-
`phatic aldehyde parent molecules may be represented by the
`formula:
`
`R7W0
`
`and the C4 to C14 unsaturated aliphatic ketone parent mol-
`ecules may be represented by the formula
`
`MAXR
`
`9
`
`where R7 is H2 or a branched or unbranched, substituted or
`unsubstituted C1 to C11 lower alkyl, or branched or
`unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted C1 to C11 lower
`alkenyl. R8 is H2 or branched or unbranched, substituted or
`unsubstituted C1 to C10 lower alkyl, or branched or
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`Exhibit 1006
`Exhibit 1006
`Page 0009
`Page 0009
`
`

`

`US 2009/0062126 A1
`
`Mar. 5, 2009
`
`where R5 is a C1 to C12 branched or unbranched, substituted
`or unsubstituted saturated alkyl or a C1 to C12 branched or
`unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted unsaturated alkenyl;
`and R6 is a C1 to C12 branched or unbranched, substituted or
`unsubstituted saturated alkyl or a C1 to C12 branched or
`unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted unsaturated alkenyl.
`R5 and R6 may be the same or different.
`[0049]
`In a preferred embodiment, the metabolites of C3 to
`C14 (x,[3-unsaturated aldehydes include but are not limited to
`the primary alcohols, the aldehydes, and the ot,[3-unsaturated
`primary alcohols having the same carbon number as the par-
`ent compound. For example, trans-2-nonenal is expected to
`be metabolized to nonanal, 1-nonanol and trans-2-nonen—1-
`01.
`
`In other preferred embodiments, the metabolites of
`[0050]
`C4 to C14 (x,[3-unsaturated ketones include but are not limited
`to the saturated ketone or secondary alcohol having the same
`carbon number as the parent compound, and having the
`hydroxyl bound to the (former) carbonyl carbon of the parent
`compound. For example, trans-3 -nonen-2-one is expected to
`be metabolized to 2-nonanone and 2-nonanol.
`
`Preferred methods of detecting these metabolites
`[0051]
`include but are not limited to solvent extraction or solid phase
`microextraction of tuber tissue and analysis of the extract by,
`for example, high performance liquid chromatography-mass
`spectrometry or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
`Levels of breakdown products in potato tuber tissue will be
`dependent upon cultivar, length of exposure to the parent
`compound(s), storage time and storage temperature, etc.
`Generally, detection of the presence of one or more of the
`breakdown products at a level in the range of from about 14
`ng/g fresh weight to about 1000 ng/g fresh weight, and pref-
`erably at least about twice the level present in non-treated
`potatoes, is sufficient to establish that potato tubers have
`previously been exposed to C3 to C14 (x,[3-unsaturated alde-
`hydes and ketones. Those of skill in the art will recognize that
`control potatoes are typically potatoes that have not been
`exposed to C3 to C14 (x,[3-unsaturated aldehydes and ketones
`from exogenous sources, but which may naturally contain
`background levels of the metabolites of interest, which do
`occur naturally in potato tubers.
`[0052] The following non-limiting examples serve to fur-
`ther illustrate the practice of the invention.
`
`EXAMPLES
`
`Example 1
`Determination of the Metabolites of 3-nonen—2-one
`
`(3N2) and trans-2-nonenal (T2N)
`
`[0053] The objective of this study was to determine the
`metabolites of 3-nonen-2-one (3N2) and trans-2-nonenal
`(T2N), which are two examples of(x,[3-unsaturated aldehydes
`and ketones that inhibit sprouting in potatoes as described in
`US. Pat. No. 6,855,669. Potato tubers were treated with 3N2
`or T2N (0.75 mmol/kg tuber) for 24 h in a closed chamber.
`The chemicals were volatilized from filter paper inside the
`chamber. The tubers were removed from the treatment cham-
`
`ber and placed at 9° C. for up to 28 days.
`[0054]
`Samples were taken for analysis of residues and
`metabolite identification over the 28-day storage period. FIG.
`1 shows that the tubers metabolized the 3N2 to 2-nonanone
`
`and 2-nonanol. 2-Nonanol was the mo st persistent, maintain-
`ing a 1.2 ppm residue in the outermost 20 mm of tubers
`through 28 days following treatment with 3N2 (FIG. 1).
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`1,4 GROUP, INC.
`Exhibit 1006
`Exhibit 1006
`Page 0010
`Page 0010
`
`unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted C1 to C10 lower
`alkenyl. R9 is branched or unbranched, substituted or unsub-
`stituted C1 to C11 lower alkyl, or branched or unbranched,
`substituted or unsubstituted C1 to C11 lower alkenyl. Pre-
`ferred aliphatic aldehydes for which breakdown products are
`traced include trans-2-pentenal;
`trans-2-hexenal;
`trans-2-
`heptenal; trans-2-octenal; trans-2-nonenal; trans-2-decenal;
`trans-2-undecenal;
`trans-2-dodecenal;
`trans,
`trans-2,4,
`-nonadienal; and trans-2, cis-6-nonadienal. Preferred ali-
`phatic ketones for which breakdown products are traced
`include trans-3-hepten-2-one, trans-3-octen-2-one, trans-3-
`nonen-2-one, and trans-3-decen-2-one.
`[0044] The breakdown products that are detected by the
`methods ofthe invention include, for example, aliphatic alde-
`hydes having the chemical formula
`
`0 |
`
`|c
`Rl/ \H
`
`[0045] where R1 is a C2 to C13 branched or unbranched,
`substituted or unsubstituted saturated alkyl or a C2 to C13
`branched or unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted unsat-
`urated alkenyl.
`[0046] Ketones that may be detected in the practice of the
`invention generally have the chemical formula
`
`where R2 is a C1 to C12 branched or unbranched, substituted
`or unsubstituted saturated alkyl or a C1 to C12 branched or
`unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted unsaturated alkenyl.
`R3 is a C1 to C12 branched or unbranched, substituted or
`unsubstituted saturated alkyl, or a C1 to C12 branched or
`unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted unsaturated alkenyl.
`R2 and R3 may be the same or different.
`[0047] Aliphatic C3 to C14 primary alcohols that may be
`detected in the practice of the invention generally have the
`chemical formula
`
`OH
`
`AR4
`
`H
`
`where R4 is a C2 to C13 branched or unbranched, substituted
`or unsubstituted saturated alkyl or a C2 to C13 branched or
`unbranched, substituted or unsubstituted unsaturated alkenyl.
`[0048] Aliphatic C3 to C14 secondary alcohols that may be
`detected in the practice of the present invention generally
`have the chemical formula
`
`

`

`US 2009/0062126 A1
`
`Mar. 5, 2009
`
`When tubers were treated similarly with T2N, the metabolites
`were trans-2-nonen-1-ol, nonanal and 1-nonanol (FIG. 2).
`The trends in residue levels were similar to that of3N2 and the
`
`most persistent metabolite was trans-2-nonen-1-ol.
`
`Example 4
`Use of Mixtures of 3N2 and 2-nonanone as Inhibi-
`
`tors of Sprouting of Potato Tubers
`
`Example 2
`
`Use of Nonanal, 1-nonanol, and trans-2-nonen-1-ol
`as Inhibitors of Sprouting of Potato Tubers
`
`[0055] The objective of this study was to determine the
`extent to which nonanal, 1-nonanol, and trans -2 -nonene-1 -ol
`(metabolites of T2N) inhibit sprouting of potato tubers rela-
`tive to T2N. Tubers were treated separately with 0.25, 0.5 and
`0.75 mmol/kg of T2N, nonanal, 1-nonanol, and trans-2-non-
`ene-1-ol for 24 h as described in Example 1. The treated
`tubers were placed at 19° C. and sprout fresh weights were
`measured 21 days after treatment. The percentage inhibition
`of sprouting relative to untreated control tubers is shown in
`Table 1. T2N inhibited sprouting (100%) at all concentra-
`tions. Nonanal and 1-nonanol inhibited sprouting by 13 to
`51%, depending on the compound and the concentration that
`was used.
`
`TABLE 1
`
`Effects of 9-carbon aliphatic aldehydes and primary
`alcohols on sprouting of potato tubers.
`
`Inhibitor
`
`trans-2-nonenal
`nonanal
`l-nonanol
`trans-2-nonen-1-ol
`
`mmol/kg tubers
`0.5
`% Inhibition
`
`100
`32.1
`24.5
`62.8
`
`0.25
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket