throbber
British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91, 1624 – 1631
`& 2004 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved 0007 – 0920/04 $30.00
`
`www.bjcancer.com
`
`Dietary induction of NQO1 increases the antitumour activity of
`mitomycin C in human colon tumours in vivo
`
`A Begleiter*,1,2, MK Leith1, JA Thliveris3 and T Digby2
`1Department of Internal Medicine, Manitoba Institute of Cell Biology, CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg,
`Manitoba, Canada R3E 0V9; 2Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Manitoba Institute of Cell Biology, CancerCare Manitoba, University of
`Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 0V9; 3Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, University of Manitoba,
`730 William Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3J7
`
`The bioreductive antitumour agent, mitomycin C (MMC), requires activation by reductive enzymes like NAD(P)H:quinone
`oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1). We used a novel approach to increase MMC efficacy by selectively inducing NQO1 in tumour cells in
`vivo. CD-1 nude mice were implanted with HCT116 cells, and fed control diet or diet containing 0.3% of the NQO1 inducer,
`1 MMC and dicoumarol, an NQO1 inhibitor.
`dimethyl fumarate (DMF). The mice were then treated with saline, 2.0, 3.5 or 2.0 mg kg
`The DMF diet increased NQO1 activity by 2.5-fold in the tumours, but had no effect in marrow cells. Mice given control diet/
`
`1 MMC had tumours with the same volume as control mice; however, mice given DMF diet/2.0 mg kg1 MMC had
`2.0 mg kg
`1 MMC were similar to those in mice given control diet/
`significantly smaller tumours. Tumour volumes in mice given DMF/2.0 mg kg
`1 MMC. Tumour inhibition was partially reversed in mice given DMF/2.0 mg kg
`1 MMC and dicoumarol. DMF diet/
`3.5 mg kg
`1 MMC treatment did not increase myelosuppression and did not produce any organ toxicity. These results provide strong
`2.0 mg kg
`evidence that dietary inducers of NQO1 can increase the antitumour activity of bioreductive agents like MMC without increasing
`toxicity.
`British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91, 1624 – 1631. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602171 www.bjcancer.com
`Published online 5 October 2004
`& 2004 Cancer Research UK
`
`Keywords: mitomycin C; antitumour activity; NQO1; diet; induction
`
`

`
`

`
`Bioreductive agents are a class of anticancer drugs that must be
`activated in cells by reduction. These agents are preferentially
`active in solid tumours, which represent the majority of cancers
`and the highest mortality. The clinical potential (Workman and
`Stratford, 1993) and mode of action (Rauth et al, 1993; Rockwell
`et al, 1993) of these agents have been actively studied, and the use
`of the prototype drug mitomycin C (MMC) in the clinic was
`recently reviewed (Begleiter, 2000). Bioreductive agents are
`generally activated by one-electron reducing enzymes
`like
`NADPH:cytochrome P450 reductase (RED) (Pan et al, 1984;
`Rockwell et al, 1993) or two-electron reducing enzymes like
`NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1; DT-diaphorase)
`(Riley and Workman, 1992; Ross et al, 1993). RED and NQO1
`are the major activators for current agents (Begleiter et al, 1989,
`1992; Hoban et al, 1990; Riley and Workman, 1992; Begleiter and
`Leith, 1993; Ross et al, 1993; Patterson et al, 1995), but their role
`varies with the agent, enzyme, oxygen level (Marshall et al, 1989;
`Hoban et al, 1990; Begleiter et al, 1992) and pH (Siegel et al, 1990;
`Begleiter and Leith, 1993). Reduction of MMC activates alkylating
`
`*Correspondence: Dr A Begleiter, Departments of Internal Medicine and
`Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Manitoba Institute of Cell Biology,
`CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue,
`Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 0V9; E-mail: begleit@cc.umanitoba.ca
`Received 11 June 2004; revised 28 July 2004; accepted 29 July 2004;
`published online 5 October 2004
`
`groups that form DNA crosslinks, and this is the most important
`cytotoxic mechanism for this agent (Lown et al, 1976; Pan et al,
`1986; Tomasz et al, 1987; Riley and Workman, 1992). However,
`in the presence of oxygen, redox cycling occurs to form reactive
`oxygen species, which can also contribute to cytotoxic activity
`(Lown et al, 1976; Dusre et al, 1989; Riley and Workman, 1992).
`NQO1 catalyses
`two-electron reduction of quinones and
`nitrogen-oxides (Ernster, 1987; Riley and Workman, 1992). Several
`human diaphorases are known (Jaiswal et al, 1990, 1991; Riley and
`Workman, 1992), but NQO1 is most important for activating
`bioreductive agents (Jaiswal, 1991; Riley and Workman, 1992;
`Belinsky and Jaiswal, 1993). NQO1 is a homodimer that uses
`NAD(P)H as an electron donor (Riley and Workman, 1992). The
`enzyme is mainly cytosolic, but 5 – 10% is membrane bound (Riley
`and Workman, 1992). It is ubiquitous in eukaryotes but levels vary
`in different tissues (Schlager and Powis, 1990; Riley and Workman,
`1992; Belinsky and Jaiswal, 1993), with low levels in haematopoetic
`cells (Schlager and Powis, 1990; Siegel et al, 2001). NQO1 activity is
`usually higher in tumour than normal cells, but is lower in vivo
`than in vitro (Schlager and Powis, 1990; Riley and Workman, 1992;
`Belinsky and Jaiswal, 1993; Ross et al, 1994; Collard et al, 1995).
`Expression of NQO1 is transcriptionally regulated (Riley and
`Workman, 1992), and the enzyme is highly inducible by a wide
`variety of inducers (Prestera et al, 1993). The induction pathway is
`unknown but may involve a cytosolic redox signal that alters
`expression and/or interaction of transcriptional factors like Jun,
`
`Experimental Therapeutics
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`

`
`ExperimentalTherapeutics
`
`1625
`
`Increasing mitomycin C activity by inducing NQO1 in vivo
`A Begleiter et al
`
`Cell lines and clonogenic assays
`
`HCT116 cells were grown in DMEM/Hams F12 media and 10%
`foetal bovine sera. Clonogenic assays were performed as previously
`described (Begleiter and Leith, 1993). Cloning efficiency ranged
`from 51 to 90%. Cells were incubated at 371C for 48 h in the
`presence or absence of 5 mM DMF and then were treated with
`various concentrations of MMC for 1 h. Cells were plated and
`colonies were counted 6 days later. A linear regression analysis of
`each concentration – survival curve was obtained and the D10 was
`derived from the negative reciprocal of
`the regression slope
`(Begleiter et al, 1992). The cytotoxicities were compared statisti-
`cally by a t-test comparing the significance of the differences of the
`slopes of the concentration – survival curves.
`For implantation into CD-1 nude mice, the HCT116 cells were
`counted, washed three times in HBSS, assessed for viability with
`trypan blue and resuspended at a concentration of 5 107 viable
`cells per ml in HBSS; 100 ml of the cell suspension was injected
`subcutaneously into the right flank of each mouse.
`
`NQO1 activity measurements
`
`NQO1 activity was measured as described previously (Doherty
`et al, 1998) using menadione as electron acceptor and is reported
`1 mg protein
`1. Protein was deter-
`as nmol MTT reduced min
`mined with the Bio-Rad DC kit using gamma-globulin as protein
`standard. NQO1 activity was measured in 0.25 M sucrose sonicates
`of HCT116 cells, mouse marrow cells and in sonicates of
`homogenised mouse tissue. Mouse organs were excised and stored
`frozen at 801C in sucrose until analysis. Marrow was obtained by
`flushing the mouse femurs with HBSS and pooled from several
`mice. The marrow cells were layered over NycoPrep 1.077A and
`spun at 600 g for 15 min; the resulting layer of cells was washed and
`frozen at 801C in sucrose until analysis. NQO1 activities in
`HCT116 cells in vitro were compared statistically by t-test. In
`mouse organs, the NQO1 activities were compared statistically by
`Mann – Whitney rank sum test.
`
`Effect of dose and schedule of DMF on induction of NQO1
`in vivo
`
`To determine the optimal concentration of DMF in the diet for
`NQO1 induction, CD-1 mice were fed experimental diet containing
`0, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4% DMF for 2 weeks. The mice were then killed and
`the liver, forestomach and kidney were removed and stored frozen
`at 801C in 0.25 M sucrose until analysis for NQO1 activity.
`To determine the optimal length of DMF feeding for induction
`of NQO1 activity, CD-1 nude mice were implanted subcutaneously
`in the right flanks with 5 106 HCT116 cells and the mice were fed
`custom experimental diet containing no DMF for 18, 15, 11 or 4
`days. The mice were then fed experimental diet containing 0.3%
`DMF for 0, 3, 7 or 14 days, respectively, prior to killing 18 days
`following tumour implantation. The HCT116 xenografts were
`approximately 100 – 250 mm3 at this time. The mice were killed, the
`organs (kidney,
`liver,
`lung, heart and forestomach) and the
`HCT116 xenografts were removed and marrow was obtained. All
`tissues were frozen at 801C prior to measurement of NQO1
`activity.
`
`In vivo combination treatment studies
`
`For the in vivo combination treatment studies, CD-1 nude mice
`were implanted with 5 106 HCT116 cells subcutaneously in the
`right flank of each mouse. The mice were fed a standard irradiated
`mouse diet for the first 7 – 10 days following tumour implantation
`and then randomly switched to the experimental diet containing 0
`or 0.3% DMF for a further 7 – 10 days. At this time, day 0, mice
`with tumours measuring approximately 100 – 250 mm3 were
`
`Nrf, Maf, Fos and Fra with the xenobiotic response element and the
`antioxidant response element (Belinsky and Jaiswal, 1993; Favreau
`and Pickett, 1993; Venugopal and Jaiswal, 1996, 1998; Yao et al,
`1996; Kepa and Ross, 1999; Nguyen et al, 2000). An NF-kB element
`may also be involved in induction (Yao and O’Dwyer, 1995). NQO1
`is induced by a wide variety of dietary and synthetic agents
`including: dithiolethiones like Oltipraz, an antiparasitic agent;
`isothiocyanates like sulforaphane, found in cruciferous vegetables,
`and dietary metabolites
`like dimethyl
`fumarate (DMF), a
`metabolite of fumaric acid which is found in fruits and vegetables
`(Talalay et al, 1988; Prestera et al, 1993). NQO1 is a member of the
`phase II detoxifying enzymes that help to remove xenobiotics from
`cells and are important in early defence against carcinogenesis
`(Prestera et al, 1993). Inducers of NQO1 like Oltipraz have been
`tested as cancer preventive agents in animals and humans (Egner
`et al, 1994; Hecht, 1998; Kensler et al, 1998).
`Activation of MMC by NQO1 has been extensively studied (Riley
`and Workman, 1992; Ross et al, 1993). Cells with elevated NQO1
`levels are more sensitive to MMC and drug activity is decreased by
`the NQO1 inhibitor, dicoumarol (DIC) (Begleiter et al, 1989;
`Marshall et al, 1989; Siegel et al, 1990). NQO1 is a major activating
`enzyme for MMC and other bioreductive agents including, RH1
`and MeDZQ (Workman and Stratford, 1993; Riley and Workman,
`1992; Beall et al, 1995; Winski et al, 1998). Thus, selectively
`increasing the level of NQO1 in tumour cells by gene transfer
`(Rauth et al, 1998) or by selective induction of NQO1 in tumours
`may be useful for enhancing the efficacy of bioreductive agents.
`We showed previously that we could selectively increase NQO1
`activity in tumour cells compared with normal cells and that this
`enhanced MMC antitumour activity in vitro (Doherty et al, 1998;
`Wang et al, 1999). In this study we investigated whether we could
`selectively induce NQO1 activity in human tumours implanted in a
`nude mouse model, and if this would increase the antitumour
`activity of bioreductive agents without increasing the toxicity of
`these agents.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials
`
`The human colon carcinoma HCT116 cell line was obtained from
`ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and DMEM/Hams F12 media, foetal
`bovine sera and Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) were
`obtained from Invitrogen (Burlington, ON, Canada). The
`HCT116 cells tested negative for mycoplasma contamination.
`DMF, MMC and DIC were from Sigma-Aldrich Canada (Oakville,
`ON, Canada) as were all reagents for the NQO1 activity assay.
`NycoPrep 1.077A was from Cedarlane (Hornby, ON, Canada). Bio-
`Rad DC Protein kit was from Bio-Rad (Canada) Ltd (Mississauga,
`ON, Canada).
`Female CD-1 and CD-1 nude mice (6 – 8 weeks of age) were
`obtained from Charles River Canada (Montreal, QC, Canada) and
`were maintained according to institutional regulations. The mice
`were
`fed standard irradiated rodent
`chow except during
`the experimental diet period. The experimental diet for the mice
`was a custom powdered autoclavable, semipurified diet with
`antioxidant free corn oil and vitamin K instead of menadione
`from ICN Biochemical Division (Aurora, OH, USA). Diets with
`different concentrations of DMF in the diet were made by the
`addition of finely ground DMF to the custom diet followed by
`autoclaving.
`Microvettes CB 300 with potassium EDTA, used for blood
`collection, were obtained from Sarstedt (St Leonard, QC, Canada).
`Zap-oglobin II lytic reagent and Isoton II were obtained from
`Beckman Coulter
`(Mississauga, ON, Canada). Ketalean and
`Rompum were obtained from Central Animal Care, University of
`Manitoba (Winnipeg, MB, Canada).
`
`& 2004 Cancer Research UK
`
`British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91(8), 1624 – 1631
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`
`1
`1 protein
`1 mg
`94.073.0 nmol min
`cells
`control
`in
`to
`1
`1 mg protein
`194.075.3 nmol min
`in DMF
`treated
`cells
`(Po0.001) (Figure 1). Cells that had been pretreated with DMF
`and then were treated with MMC were more sensitive to MMC than
`cells that did not receive DMF (Figure 1). The D10 for cells treated
`with MMC alone was 2.1270.13 mM while that for cells treated with
`DMF and MMC was 1.5570.43 mM, and this difference was
`statistically significant (Po0.001).
`
`Effect of dose and schedule of DMF on induction of NQO1
`in HCT116 cells in vivo
`
`CD-1 mice were fed a diet containing 0, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4% DMF for 14
`days. NQO1 activities in the kidney, liver and forestomach were
`increased in mice fed a diet containing DMF compared to mice
`receiving a control diet; however, enzyme activities in mice fed diet
`containing 0.3 or 0.4% DMF were not significantly different.
`CD-1 nude mice implanted with HCT116 cells
`received
`experimental diet containing 0.3% DMF for 0, 3, 7 or 14 days.
`NQO1 activity increased in the implanted tumours and reached a
`plateau level at approximately 7 days on the DMF diet (Figure 2).
`In contrast, enzyme levels in forestomach, kidney, lung and liver
`tissues continued to increase to 14 days on the DMF diet, while
`NQO1 activity in heart tissue remained unchanged. NQO1 activity
`
`* P < 0.001
`
`*
`
`Control
`
`DMF
`
`200
`
`100
`
`0
`
`(nmol min−1 mg protein−1)
` NQO1 activity
`
`1
`
`0.1
`
`0.01
`
`Surviving cell fraction
`
`MMC
`MMC + DMF
`
`0.001
`
`0
`
`2
`MMC (♯M)
`
`4
`
`Figure 1 Effect of DMF on cytotoxic activity of MMC in HCT116 cells in
`vitro. Cells were incubated at 371C for 48 h in the absence or presence of
`5 mM DMF. NQO1 activity was measured in some of the cells, and the
`remaining cells were treated with MMC for 1 h. Cells were plated and
`surviving cell
`fraction was determined by clonogenic assay. The points
`represent the mean surviving cell fraction7s.e. of 5 – 15 determinations.
`The lines are linear regression lines. Inset:
`level of NQO1 activity in cells
`incubated in the absence or presence of DMF. The bars represent the
`mean NQO1 activity7s.e. of 8 determinations. The means were
`compared by a t-test evaluating the significance of the difference of the
`NQO1 activity in control and DMF incubated cells.
`
`Increasing mitomycin C activity by inducing NQO1 in vivo
`A Begleiter et al
`
`1626
`
`randomly assigned to treatment groups. The mice were weighed
`and received a single tail-vein injection of saline (control diet and
`1 MMC (control diet and 0.3% DMF
`0.3% DMF diet), 2.0 mg kg
`1 MMC (control diet only). In addition, some
`diet) or 3.5 mg kg
`mice on the 0.3% DMF diet received a single i.p injection of
`1 DIC 1 h prior to the 2.0 mg kg
`1 MMC injection. Some
`34 mg kg
`mice with tumours were killed at day 0 and organs, marrow and
`xenografts were removed for measurement of NQO1 activity. On
`day 1, the diet for all the mice was switched to the standard
`irradiated diet. On days 0, 3, 7, 10, 15 and 18, tumour diameters in
`three dimensions were measured using digital calipers, and
`tumour volume was calculated by the formula (l w d 0.5236)
`(Rockwell et al, 1972). Mouse body weights were also recorded on
`these same days. Differences in tumour volumes were analysed
`statistically by a t-test comparing the slopes of the regression lines
`for plots of tumour volume vs days after MMC treatment in mice
`receiving different treatments.
`
`White blood cell (WBC) and platelet counts
`On days 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15, approximately 20 ml of blood was
`collected from the saphenous veins of some of the mice from each
`treatment group (Hem et al, 1998). The blood was collected into a
`microvette CB 300 with potassium EDTA and 10 ml aliquots were
`used for the determination of WBC or platelet counts. The counts
`were determined with a Coulter Z2 particle count and cell analyser
`(Beckman Coulter, Mississauga, ON, Canada). The Coulter Z2
`counter was optimised for mouse white blood cells and platelets
`according to the manufacturer’s protocols and all counts were
`analysed with the Coulter AccuComp software program. WBC were
`counted with a 100 mm aperture tube (set for a lower threshold of
`3 mm) following the addition of Zap-oglobin II lytic reagent to the
`coulter counter vial (50 ml per 10 ml Isoton II). For counting of
`platelets, 10 ml of mouse blood was diluted in 240 ml Isoton II and
`spun at 83 g for 3 min to remove the red blood cells. In total,
`100 ml of supernatant was then diluted in Isoton II and the platelets
`were counted using a 50 or 70 mm aperture tube with a lower
`threshold of 1.4 fl and an upper threshold of 24.4 fl. Differences in
`the WBC and platelet counts in different treatment groups were
`analysed statistically by ANOVA for each time point.
`
`MMC toxicity in vivo
`CD-1 nude mice (n¼ 3) without tumours were fed a 0 or 0.3%
`DMF diet for 7 – 10 days and then were treated with a single tail-
`1 MMC (control
`vein injection of saline (control diet), 2.0 mg kg
`diet and 0.3% DMF diet). After 7 days, the mice were anesthetised
`with Ketalean/Rompum and blood was obtained by cardiac
`puncture. The mice were then euthanised with carbon dioxide
`and organs were removed and fixed in neutral buffered formalin.
`The blood was allowed to clot and the serum was collected
`following centrifugation at 1500 g for 15 min. The serum was
`stored frozen at 801C until analysed. The serum was analysed in a
`Roche Hitachi 917 (Health Sciences Centre, Department of Clinical
`Chemistry, Winnipeg, MB, Canada) for the following parameters:
`Na, K, Cl, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, alkaline
`phophatase, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, gam-
`ma-glutamyl transpeptidase,
`lactate dehydrogenase. The organs
`were sectioned, stained with haematoxalin and eosin and examined
`histologically.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Effect of induction of NQO1 on cytotoxic activity of MMC
`in vitro
`
`When HCT116 cells were incubated in vitro with, or without,
`DMF,
`the
`level
`of NQO1
`activity
`increased
`from
`
`Experimental Therapeutics
`
`British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91(8), 1624 – 1631
`
`& 2004 Cancer Research UK
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`
`Increasing mitomycin C activity by inducing NQO1 in vivo
`A Begleiter et al
`
`1627
`
`Table 1 Effect of DMF diet on NQO1 activity in tumours and normal
`tissues
`
`NQO1 activity (nmol min
`
`1 mg protein
`
`1)
`
`Tissue
`
`Control diet
`
`DMF diet
`
`Ratio
`DMF/control
`
`Tumour
`Marrow
`Kidney
`Liver
`Lung
`Heart
`Forestomach
`
`5975
`1372
`13578
`3972
`3375
`9175
`362728
`
`145710
`1773
`329713
`5472
`4374
`8677
`952754
`
`2.5*
`1.4
`2.4*
`1.4*
`1.3
`0.9
`2.6*
`
`CD-1 nude mice implanted with HCT116 tumours were fed a 0 or 0.3% DMF diet
`for 7 – 10 days. Mice were euthanised and NQO1 activity was measured in different
`tissues. Data are mean7s.e. of 9 – 17 mice. NQO1 activity in mice fed control diet
`and diet containing DMF were compared by Mann – Whitney rank sum test.
`*Po0.05.
`
`Control
`MMC (2.0 mg kg−1)
`MMC (3.5 mg kg−1)
`DMF + MMC (2.0 mg kg−1)
`DMF + MMC (2.0 mg kg−1) + DIC
`
`600
`
`400
`
`200
`
`Tumour volume (mm3)
`
`ExperimentalTherapeutics
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`Days post MMC
`
`15
`
`Figure 3 Effect of DMF diet on MMC antitumour activity in HCT116
`xenografts in CD-1 nude mice. Mice were implanted with tumour cells
`subcutaneously in the right flank of each mouse. After 7 – 10 days the mice
`were fed a diet containing 0 or 0.3% DMF for 7 – 10 days. The mice were
`weighed and received a single tail-vein injection of saline (control diet and
`1 MMC (control diet and 0.3% DMF diet) or
`0.3% DMF diet), 2.0 mg kg
`1 MMC (control diet only). In addition, some mice on the 0.3%
`3.5 mg kg
`1 DIC 1 h prior to the
`DMF diet received a single i.p. injection of 34 mg kg
`1 MMC injection. On days 0, 3, 7, 10, 15 and 18, tumour volumes
`2.0 mg kg
`were measured using digital calipers. The points represent the mean
`tumour volume7s.d. of 6 – 14 mice. The lines are linear regression lines.
`
`1
`that observed in mice fed control diet and treated with 3.5 mg kg
`MMC. DMF diet alone did not inhibit the increase in tumour
`volume (data not shown).
`
`Tumour
`Liver
`Forestomach
`Kidney
`Lung
`Marrow
`Heart
`
`500
`
`400
`
`300
`
`200
`
`100
`
`NQO1 activity (as % of control)
`
`0
`
`3
`
`9
`6
`Days on DMF diet
`
`12
`
`Figure 2 Effect of time on DMF diet on NQO1 activity in human
`tumour xenografts and normal tissues in CD-1 nude mice. CD-1 nude mice
`were implanted subcutaneously in the right flank with HCT116 cells and
`the mice received diet containing 0.3% DMF for 0, 3, 7 or 14 days. The
`mice were killed, the organs (kidney, liver, lung, heart, forestomach) and the
`HCT116 xenografts were removed and marrow was obtained. For each
`tissue, NQO1 activity was measured and is reported as the NQO1 activity
`in that tissue as a percent of NQO1 activity in the same tissue in mice fed
`diet containing no DMF. The points represent the means of values obtained
`from three mice.
`
`in bone marrow reached a peak at 3 days on the DMF diet, and
`decreased after that time.
`
`Effect of induction of NQO1 on MMC antitumour activity
`and toxicity in vivo
`
`CD-1 nude mice implanted with HCT116 cells were fed either
`control experimental diet or diet containing 0.3% DMF for 7 – 10
`days. Some mice were euthanised at that time and tumours and
`tissues were excised. The remaining mice were weighed, tumour
`volumes were measured and blood samples were obtained from
`some mice for WBC and platelet counts. The mice were then
`1
`treated with saline or DIC, and then with saline, 2.0 or 3.5 mg kg
`MMC. On various days, tumour volumes were measured and blood
`samples were obtained for WBC and platelet counts. Average
`tumour volumes on the day of MMC treatment ranged from 132 to
`163 mm3 for the different treatment groups and these differences
`were not statistically significant. The level of NQO1 increased by
`2.5-fold in the tumours and to a similar extent in the kidneys and
`forestomach (Po0.001) in mice fed diet containing DMF (Table 1).
`In contrast, NQO1 activity increased by 1.4-fold in liver (Po0.02),
`but did not
`increase significantly in bone marrow,
`lung or
`heart.
`The tumour volumes increased in all the mice, with the tumour
`volume in control mice (mice fed control diet and treated with
`saline) increasing by four-fold 18 days after treatment (Figure 3).
`1 MMC showed
`Mice fed control diet and treated with 2.0 mg kg
`the same rate of increase in tumour volume as control mice. In
`contrast, the rate of tumour growth in mice fed DMF diet and
`1 MMC was approximately 15% lower than
`treated with 2.0 mg kg
`the rate of tumour growth in control mice or in mice fed control
`1 MMC, and this difference was
`diet and treated with 2.0 mg kg
`statistically significant (Po0.01). Mice fed DMF diet that received
`1 MMC showed a partial reversal of the
`DIC prior to 2.0 mg kg
`enhanced antitumour effect observed in mice fed DMF diet and
`1 MMC. The antitumour effect seen in mice
`treated with 2.0 mg kg
`1 MMC was equivalent to
`fed DMF diet and treated with 2.0 mg kg
`
`& 2004 Cancer Research UK
`
`British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91(8), 1624 – 1631
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`
`Table 2 Effect of DMF diet and MMC on blood chemistry
`
`Tissue
`
`Test
`
`MMC
`
`DMF+MMC
`
`Liver
`
`Kidney
`
`Dehydration
`
`Alkaline phosphatase
`Alanine transaminase
`Aspartate transaminase
`Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase
`Lactate dehydrogenase
`Serum creatinine
`Blood urea nitrogen
`Sodium
`Potassium
`Chloride
`
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`
`CD-1 nude mice without tumours were fed a 0 or 0.3% DMF diet for 7 – 10 days and
`1
`then were treated with a single tail-vein injection of saline (control diet), 2.0 mg kg
`MMC (control diet and 0.3% DMF diet). After 7 days, three mice/group were
`anaesthetised and blood was obtained by cardiac puncture. The blood was allowed
`to clot and the serum was collected and analysed.
`
`1 MMC.
`counts as mice fed control diet and treated with 2.0 mg kg
`DMF diet without MMC treatment had no effect on WBC count
`(data not shown).
`No significant decreases in platelet counts were observed in any
`of the groups of mice in the 15 days following MMC treatment
`(Figure 5). DMF diet without MMC treatment had no effect on
`platelet count (data not shown). There were no significant
`differences in body weight in the different treatment groups at
`18 days after MMC treatment (data not shown).
`In another experiment, CD-1 nude mice received either control
`experimental diet or diet containing 0.3% DMF for 7 – 10 days. The
`1 MMC and the
`mice were then treated with saline or 2.0 mg kg
`animals were euthanised 7 days later. Histological analysis of
`tissues from these mice showed no evidence of damage to kidney,
`liver, lung, heart, colon or forestomach tissues in the MMC treated
`mice fed either control or DMF. Furthermore, treatment with
`1 MMC did not produce any significant changes in
`2.0 mg kg
`blood chemistry in mice fed control or DMF diet (Table 2).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`MMC is an anticancer agent that has proved to be most effective in
`the front line treatment of a small number of solid tumours, such
`as superficial bladder, gastric, pancreatic, anal, oesophageal and
`non-small-cell cancer (Remers, 1979, pp 27 – 32; Doll et al, 1985;
`Begleiter, 2000). It is also used in palliative treatment of advanced
`or resistant cancers, generally in combination regimens (Begleiter,
`2000). There has been continued interest
`in increasing the
`effectiveness of this agent because of its activity in solid tumours
`and its enhanced effectiveness against hypoxic cells that are
`resistant to radiation (Workman and Stratford, 1993).
`Use of MMC in the clinic has been severely restricted by its
`toxicity (Hortobagyi, 1993; Begleiter, 2000). The usual dose-
`limiting toxicity is myelosuppression, which occurs 3 – 4 weeks
`after drug administration, with recovery within 8 weeks (Begleiter,
`2000). Generally, thrombocytopenia or leukopenia is most severe,
`but anemia is also common. Less common, but potentially serious
`or fatal
`toxicities associated with MMC use include severe
`pulmonary toxicity that occurs in 5% of patients (Doll et al,
`1985; Begleiter, 2000), and cancer-associated haemolytic – uremic
`syndrome, which can occur in 4 – 15% of patients (Doll et al, 1985;
`Begleiter, 2000). In addition, some cases of severe congestive heart
`failure have been reported after MMC treatment
`in patients
`previously treated with doxorubicin (Doll et al, 1985).
`MMC requires intracellular activation by reductive enzymes like
`NQO1 and NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase (Rockwell et al,
`
`Increasing mitomycin C activity by inducing NQO1 in vivo
`A Begleiter et al
`
`1628
`
`Control
`MMC (2.0 mg kg−1)
`MMC (3.5 mg kg−1)
`DMF + MMC (2.0 mg kg−1)
`
`0
`
`3
`
`9
`6
`Days post-MMC
`
`12
`
`15
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`(10−9 × WBC count)/ l
`
`Figure 4 Effect of DMF diet on MMC toxicity to WBC in CD-1 nude
`mice. CD-1 nude mice were implanted with HCT116 cells subcutaneously
`in the right flank of each mouse. After 7 – 10 days the mice were fed diet
`containing 0 or 0.3% DMF for 7 – 10 days. The mice were weighed and
`1
`received a single tail-vein injection of saline (control diet only), 2.0 mg kg
`1 MMC (control dietMMC (control diet and 0.3% DMF diet) or 3.5 mg kg
`
`only). On various days, approximately 20 ml of blood was collected from
`the saphenous vein of some of the mice in each treatment group. The
`WBC counts were determined with a Coulter Z2 particle counter and cell
`analyser. The points represent the mean WBC count7s.e. of 5 – 16 mice.
`Differences in the WBC counts in different
`treatment groups were
`analysed statistically by ANOVA for each time point.
`
`Control
`MMC (2.0 mg kg−1)
`MMC (3.5 mg kg−1)
`DMF + MMC (2.0 mg kg−1)
`
`0
`
`3
`
`9
`6
`Days post-MMC
`
`12
`
`15
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`(10−11 × platelet count)/l
`
`Figure 5 Effect of DMF diet on MMC toxicity to platelets in CD-1 nude
`mice. CD-1 nude mice were implanted with HCT116 cells subcutaneously
`in the right flank of each mouse. After 7 – 10 days the mice were fed a diet
`containing 0 or 0.3% DMF for 7 – 10 days. The mice were weighed and
`1
`received a single tail-vein injection of saline (control diet only), 2.0 mg kg
`1 MMC (control dietMMC (control diet and 0.3% DMF diet) or 3.5 mg kg
`
`only). On various days approximately 20 ml of blood was collected from the
`saphenous vein of some of the mice in each treatment group. The platelet
`counts were determined with a Coulter Z2 particle counter and cell
`analyser. The points represent the mean platelet counts7s.e. of 2 – 14
`mice. Differences in the platelet counts in different treatment groups were
`analysed statistically by ANOVA for each time point.
`
`Mice fed control diet and treated with MMC showed a dose-
`dependent decrease in WBC counts with the nadir occurring 3 days
`after MMC treatment (Figure 4). WBC counts recovered to control
`levels by 6 days after drug treatment. Mice fed DMF diet and
`1 MMC showed a similar decrease in WBC
`treated with 2.0 mg kg
`
`Experimental Therapeutics
`
`British Journal of Cancer (2004) 91(8), 1624 – 1631
`
`& 2004 Cancer Research UK
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`
`Increasing mitomycin C activity by inducing NQO1 in vivo
`A Begleiter et al
`
`1629
`
`ExperimentalTherapeutics
`
`1993; Workman and Stratford, 1993). Cells with elevated NQO1
`levels are generally more sensitive to MMC (Begleiter et al, 1989;
`Marshall et al, 1989; Siegel et al, 1990), and NQO1 can be induced
`by a wide variety of dietary and synthetic agents (Talalay et al,
`1988; Prestera et al, 1993). We have previously shown that NQO1
`activity can be selectively increased in tumour cells compared with
`normal cells, and that this enhances MMC cytotoxicity in human
`and murine cell lines in vitro (Doherty et al, 1998; Wang et al,
`1999). In this study we investigated a novel approach to increasing
`the antitumour activity of MMC by using a dietary component to
`selectively induce NQO1 activity in tumour cells compared with
`normal cells. We used DMF, a metabolite of fumaric acid that is
`found in fruits and vegetables (Talalay et al, 1988), as the inducer
`of NQO1 and HCT116 cells, which have a moderate level of NQO1
`activity, as a tumour model. This approach could be used with any
`bioreductive agent that is activated by NQO1, but we used MMC
`because it is the prototype bioreductive agent and is the only
`bioreductive agent in widespread clinical use.
`Treatment of HCT116 cells in vitro with DMF for 48 h increased
`NQO1 activity in these cells by two-fold (Po0.001), and cells that
`were pretreated with DMF were 1.4-fold more sensitive to MMC
`than cells that were not pretreated (Po0.001). This result was
`similar to our previous findings in murine lymphoma cells
`(Begleiter et al, 1996) and human breast, lung and colon cancer
`cells (Doherty et al, 1998; Wang et al, 1999) using synthetic
`inducers of NQO1.
`To evaluate the clinical potential of this approach to increasing
`the efficacy of MMC, we used a human tumour xenograft mouse
`model to investigate whether we could obtain a similar enhance-
`ment of antitumour activity in vivo. This model also made it
`possible to evaluate any enhanced toxicity that might result from
`the NQO1 induction. In addition, the NQO1 inducer, DMF, was
`added to the diet of the mice to test the feasibility of this route of
`administration. In preliminary studies we found that adding DMF
`to the diet of mice resulted in a dose-dependent increase in NQO1
`activity in various tissues; however, the increase in enzyme activity
`was similar with 0.3 and 0.4% DMF. Thus, 0.3% DMF was used for
`subsequent experiments. We also found that NQO1 activity in
`HCT116 tumours implanted in CD-1 nude mice reached a plateau
`after 7 days on the DMF diet while enzyme activities in other
`tissues including kidney, liver, lung and forestomach showed a
`further increase at 14 days. Interestingly, there was a very small
`increase

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket