throbber
Tous droits de propriété htellecluelle reserves. Reproduction et
`
`representation interdites sans autorisation (code de la propriété intellectuelle).
`
`E L S E V I E R M i c r o p o r o u s a n d M e s o p o r o u s M a t e r i a l s
`
`3 2 ( 1 9 9 9 ) 6 3 - 7 4
`
`- n w i s a s s
`www.elsevicr.nl/locate/micmat
`
`Siting of the Cu^ ions in dehydrated ion exchanged synthetic
`and natural chabasites: a Cu^ photoluminescence study
`
`J. Dëdeéek*, B. Wichterlová, P. Kubát
`J. Heyrovsky Institute of Physical Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Dolejikova
`CZ-I8223 Prague
`8. Czech Republic
`
`3,
`
`Received 18 M a y 1998; received in revised f o r m 19 April 1999; accepted f o r publication 26 A p r i l 1999
`
`Abstract
`
`C u ^ emission spectra o f Cu^* ion exchanged and reduced natural a n d synthetic CuNa-, CuCa-, CuCs- and CuBa-
`chabasites were used to identify cationic sites o f the Cu"*^ luminescence centres in this zeolite. T w o different C u ^
`emission bands with maxima at 500 and 540 nm were observed; the emission at
`540 nm prevailed at higher Cu
`loadings. The concentration dependence o f the intensity o f 500 a n d 540 n m emission bands indicated that both bands
`correspond to the single C u ^ ions. T h e effect o f the presence o f co-cations in Cu-chabasites on the luminescence
`spectra w a s employed f o r the identification o f the cationic sites corresponding to the individual emission bands.
`Cu"^ emission a t 500 n m reflects the Cu"^ ion located at the cationic site in the eight-membered ring. C u ^ emission a t
`5 4 0 n m is attributed to the C u ^ ion coordinated to three oxygen atoms o f the regular six-membered ring. T h e Cu"*"
`ion in this site is suggested t o b e located a b o v e the six-ring plane, similar to the siting o f C u ^ ions in
`Y zeolite.
`© 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. A l l rights reserved.
`
`Keywords; C a l i o n siting; C u - c h a b a s i t e ; C u * emission; L u m i n e s c e n c e
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Zeolites containing Cu ions attract attention
`owing to their high catalytic activity in N O [1-5]
`and N j O decomposition [6] and selective catalytic
`reduction (SCR) of N O with ammonia [7-9] and
`hydrocarbons [10-12]. The Cu"*" ions were sug­
`gested [13] t o be catalytic centres in N O and
`N2O decompositions. The essential question is the
`structure of the reaction centres. Recently, a cat­
`ionic site of the Cu"^ ions active in the N O
`decomposition over C u ~ Z S M - 5 was proposed
`
`• C o r r e s p o n d i n g a u t h o r .
`E-mail address:
`dedecek@jh-inst.cas.cz ( J . D ¿ d e ¿ e k )
`
`[14,15]. But there is stUi a lack of general informa­
`tion on the siting and coordination of the C u ^
`ions in zeolites.
`With aluminium-rich zeolites, such as chabasite,
`faujasite and A-type zeolites, the cationic sites of
`the Cu^"*" ions are known [16-19]. This knowledge
`is based on the results of X-ray diffraction ( X R D )
`experiments, b u t this technique does not, in prin­
`ciple, allow
`the determination of the oxidation
`state of the cations (since they have similar electron
`density functions), thus bringing difficulties in the
`identification of the Cu^ ion siting. For zeolites
`with a low aluminium content, such as ZSM-5,
`ferrierite and beta, which are not suitable for X R D
`investigations, there is a complete lack of informa­
`tion on the cation siting in these structures.
`
`1 3 8 7 - 1 8 1 1 / 9 9 / $- s e e f r o n t m a t t e r © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. A l l rights reserved.
`Pll-. 8 1 3 8 7 - 1 8 1 1 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 0 9 0 - 6
`
`LRD4948088088
`
`Umicore AG & Co. KG
`Exhibit 1107
`Page 1 of 12
`
`

`

`Tous droits de propriété miellectueile reserves. Reproduction et
`
`representation interdites sans autorisation (code de la propriété intellectuelle}.
`
`6 4
`
`J. Dédeiek et ai
`
`/ Microporous and Mesoporous
`
`Maleriah
`
`32 ( ¡999) 63-74
`
`Emission spectroscopy has been found to be a
`powerful tool for characterisation of the C u ^ ions
`incorporated in zeolites
`[20-23], but the assign­
`ment of the observed Cu"*" emission bands to
`defined C u ^ species is not yet resolved. The main
`interest was focused o n the C u ions exhibiting a n
`emission band at 540 nm, which was suggested t o
`be a catalytic centre in N O decomposition in high-
`silica zeolites [14,23]. Recently, we reported that
`this 540 n m emission band can represent two
`different centres with different types of lumines­
`cence kinetics; one o f them exists in high-silica
`zeolites, and the other is connected with alumin­
`ium-rich zeolites [14,23]. Strome and Klier [21,24]
`attributed the Cu"*" emission a t 540 n m in faujasite
`t o the single Cu"*" ion located in the regular six-
`ring of site r . C u ^ ions located in this site exhibit
`^3v symmetry of the
`ligand field of framework
`oxygen atoms. This suggestion was based on the
`X R D data of the siting in
`Y zeolite [17j.
`On the other hand, Anpo and coworkers [25,26]
`attributed the C u ^ ion emission at 510 n m to the
`single C u ^ ion and the emission band at
`540 n m
`was ascribed t o bridging C u ^ " C u ^ species. Their
`suggestion was based o n the EXAFS study of
`Cu+—Y zeolites.
`Also, factors controlling the emission wave­
`length of the Cu"^ ions located in zeolite matrices
`are not well established. The model proposed by
`Texter et al. [27] explains the different wavelengths
`emitted by the C u * ion implanted in various
`matrices by the repulsion of the Cu* excited state
`by the surrounding lattice. But, with regard t o the
`zeolite structural and compositional features, this
`model does not allow identification of the mecha­
`nism controlling the repulsion of the C u * ions in
`zeolites. Both the changes of the symmetry and
`strength of the
`ligand field ( L F ) of the single
`C u * ion or induced changes of the L F by the
`formation of the Cu'^'-'-Cu^ species affect the
`repulsion of the C u * excited state, i.e. the C u *
`emission wavelength.
`In the present paper, the structure of chabasite
`is used
`t o elucidate the origin of the emission
`bands at 500 and 540 nm. Both the C u * emission
`bands are attributed t o the single C u * ions, the
`band a t 500 n m t o the C u * located in the eight-
`
`membered ring, and the band at 540 n m t o the C u
`* ion located in the regular six-membered ring.
`This assignment was based on a comparison of
`the observed dependence of the intensity of the
`individual emission bands on the C u concentration
`and o n the effect of the presence of non-transition
`metal co-cations with b l o w n siting on the C u *
`emission spectra.
`
`2. Experimental
`
`2.1. Zeolite preparation
`
`The synthesis of chabasite was performed
`according t o the procedure of Gaffney [28]. Zeolite
`Y (Si/Al = 2.7) in ammonium form was used as a
`source material and was mixed with a solution of
`potassium hydroxide. The batch composition was
`0.17Na20;2.0K20:Al203:5.4Si02:224H20. The
`synthesis took place in a polypropylene bottle with
`a screw-top lid at a temperature of 368 K for 96 h
`without agitation. After synthesis, the product was
`recovered by filtration, washed repeatedly with
`deionised water and dried at ambient temperature.
`The crystallinity and phase purity were determined
`using a Siemens D5005 X-ray powder diffracto-
`meter with C u K a radiation and N i filter in the
`range of 20 of 5-50°. The diffraction pattern is
`depicted in Fig. 1 (a).
`Synthetic chabasite and natural sedimentary
`chabasite from North Korea — chemical composi­
`tion (weight percent) 63.89% SÍO2, 17.48% AljOj,
`8.37% FeîOa, 5.15% K j O . 3.10% CaO, 1.21%
`MgO, 0.40% TÍO2 and 0.39% Na^O [the X R D
`pattern is given in Fig. 1(b)] — were equilibrated
`four times with 0.5 M NaCl (20 ml of solution per
`1 g of zeolite) for 12 h . After the ion exchange, the
`Na-chabasites were washed with distilled water
`and dried at room temperature.
`Ca-, Ba- and
`Cs-chabasites were prepared by the equilibration
`of Na-chabasite with 0.1 M Ca(N03)2, Ba(N03)2
`and CsCI solutions respectively. These zeolites
`were washed with distilled water and dried at
`ambient temperature. The conditions of Ca^*,
`Ba^* and Cs* ion exchanges are given in Table 1.
`Cu^*-chabasite samples with C u concentrations
`varying from 0.20 t o 7.60 wt% were prepared by
`
`Umicore AG & Co. KG
`Exhibit 1107
`Page 2 of 12
`
`

`

`Tous droits de propriété intellectuelle reseives. Reproductior) et
`
`representation interdites sans autorisation (code de la propriété intellectuelle).
`
`J. Dédeâek el ai f Microporous andMesoporous
`
`Malerials 32 (1999)63-74 6 5
`
`a
`
`rations and chemical compositions of
`Cu-chabasites are given in Tables 2 and 3.
`
`J Jjil jjLL
`
`b
`
`\ A illi
`
`i 1
`"1 '
`10 2 0 3 0 4 0 6 0
`
` '
`
`2 6
`
`1 '
`
`r
`
`F i g . 1. X R D p a t t e r n s o f ( a ) s y n t h e t i c ( b ) n a t u r a l se<ii}nentary
`chabasites.
`
`Table 1
`P r e p a r a t i o n c o n d i t i o n s f o r Cs*-, C a ^ * - a n d Ba^*-chabasites
`
`2 ^ o l i t e ' Solution/zeolite ( m l / g ) E x c h a n g e t i m e ( h )
`
`C s N a - C H A B / N
`
`B a N a - C H A B / N
`
`C a N a - C H A B / N
`
`C a N a - C H A B / S
`
`4 0
`6 0
`4 0
`6 0
`4 0
`8 0
`8 0
`8 0
`
`6
`12
`6
`12
`6
`10
`3
`12
`
`* N ; n a t u r a l s e d i m e n t a r y c h a b a s i t e ; S: synthetic chabasite.
`
`Na-, Ca-, Cs- and
`the ion exchange of
`Ba-chabasites with aqueous solutions of Cu ace­
`tate. The p H of Cu-acetate-chabasite solutions
`varied during the Ion exchange procedure from
`5.1 t o 5.6. Samples were carefully washed with
`distilled water, dried at ambient temperature and
`grained. Detailed conditions of the sample prepa­
`
`2.2. Cu* emission
`
`photolumin­
`Prior t o monitoring of the Cu*
`escence spectra, the Cu^"*" zeolites were calcined in
`an oxygen stream at 350®C for 3 h t o remove all
`traces of organic compounds from the zeolite, well
`known as C u * luminescence quenchers [21,24,28].
`Then, they were dehydrated at 450''C with subse­
`quent reduction in hydrogen of 4 x 10^ P a for 20 s
`u p t o 64 min at 450°C o r in carbon monoxide of
`5.3 X 10^ Pa for 40 min at 450''C. The intensity of
`the C u * emission depended not only on the Cu/Al
`zeolite composition, but also on the time of the
`reduction, as is described in Section 3. For determi­
`nation of the distribution of the C u * ions in
`chabasite, the samples were reduced in hydrogen
`at conditions yielding maximum concentrations of
`the monovalent copper. Under the chosen condi­
`tions, 90% of the copper in the zeolite was in a
`monovalent state and n o significant amounts were
`reduced t o the zero-valent copper, as was proven
`by D R UV~VIS spectra (not shown here). After
`the reduction of Cu^* zeolites, the samples were
`evacuated at the temperature of reduction for
`15 min, transferred under vacuum t o the silica cell
`and sealed. The details of the reduction procedure
`of divalent t o monovalent copper, which have been
`described in detail elsewhere
`[23,29-31], are dis­
`cussed below.
`C u * emission spectra were recorded using a
`nanosecond laser kinetic spectrometer (Applied
`Photophysics). Cu*-zeolites were excited by the
`laser beam of the XeCl excimer laser (Lambda
`Physik 205, emission wavelength 308 nm, pulse
`width 28 ns, pulse energy
`100 mJ). The 320 n m
`filter was situated between a
`2 m m thick silica
`cell and the monochromator. The emission signal
`was detected with a n R
`928 photomultiplier
`(Hamamatsu), recorded with a P M 3325 oscillo­
`scope and processed by computer. All the lumines­
`cence measurements were carried out at room
`temperature. The C u * emission spectra were con­
`structed from the values of luminescence intensity
`at the individual wavelengths of emission at
`selected times after excitation (2, 5,10,20, 50, 100
`
`Umicore AG & Co. KG
`Exhibit 1107
`Page 3 of 12
`
`

`

`Tous droits de propriété intellecluelie reserves. Reproduction et representation ir)terdHes sans autorisation (code de la propriété
`
`¡nleUeciuelle).
`
`66 J. Dédelek et al.
`
`/ Microporous and Mesoporous
`
`Malerials 32 (1999) 63-74
`
`T a b l e 2
`P r e p a r a t i o n c o n d i t i o n s f o r Cu^"^-chabasi$es
`
`Zeolite*
`
`C u / A I
`
`C u c o n c e n t r a t i o n in s o l u t i o n ( M )
`
`Solution/zeolite ( m i / g )
`
`E x c h a n g e t i m e ( h )
`
`C u N a - C H A B / N
`C u N a - C H A B / N
`C u N a - C H A B / N
`C u N a - C H A D / N
`C u N a - C H A B / N * -
`C u N a - C H A B / N * »
`C u N a - C H A B / S
`C u N a - C H A B / S
`C u N a - C H A B / S
`C u N a - C H A B / S
`C u N a - C H A B / S "
`C u C s - C H A B / N
`C u C a - C H A B / N
`C u B a - C H A B / N
`C u C a - C H A B / S
`
`O.OJ
`O . l l
`0 . 1 7
`0 . 2 8
`0 . 3 4
`0 . 3 8
`O.OJ
`0 . 0 8
`0 . 1 5
`0 . 2 2
`0 . 3 2
`0 . 0 5
`0 . 1 0
`0 . 0 9
`0 . 0 3
`
`O.OOJ
`0 . 0 0 5
`0.01
`0.01
`0.01
`0.1
`0 . 0 0 1
`0 . 0 0 5
`0.01
`O.OI
`0.01
`0.01
`0.01
`0.01
`0.01
`
`* N ; n a t u r a l s e d i m e n t a r y c b a b a s i t e ; S: s y n t h e t i c chabasite.
`'• TwO'Step i o n exchange.
`
`T a b l e 3
`C h e m i c a l c o m p o s i t i o n s o f Cu^'^^-chabasites
`
`Zeolite* C u / A I M e / A ! " C a / A l N a / A l K / A I M g / A l F e / A l T i / A l
`
`2 5
`2 5
`5 0
`100
`8 0 + 8 0
`1 2 + 2 0
`2 5
`6 5
`6 0
`110
`U O + I I O
`4 0
`4 0
`4 0
`4 5
`
`3
`3
`9
`17
`3 + 1 2
`3 + 1 4
`1
`1
`3
`12
`3 + 1 5
`1
`1

`1.5
`
`N a - C H A B / N
`N a - C H A B / S
`C u N a - C H A B / N
`C u N a - C H A B / N
`C u N a - C H A B / N
`C u N a - C H A B / N
`C u N a - C H A S / N
`C u N a - C H A B / N
`C u N a - C H A B / S
`C u N a - C H A B / S
`C u N a C H A B / S
`C u N a ^ H A B / S
`C u N a - C H A B / S
`C u O - C H A B / N
`C u B a - C H A B / N
`C u C a - C H A B / N
`C u C a - C H A B / S
`
`-
`0.01
`o.n
`0 . 1 7
`0 , 2 8
`0 . 3 4
`0 . 3 8
`0.01
`0 . 0 8
`0 . 1 5
`0 , 2 2
`0 . 3 2
`0 . 0 5
`0 . 0 9
`0 . 1 0
`0 . 0 3
`
`_
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`0 . 4 2
`0 . 2 5
`
`-
`
`-
`
`O.JI
`0.01
`0.11
`0 . 0 8
`0 . 0 9
`0 . 0 7
`0 . 0 5
`0.07
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`0
`0 . 0 4
`0 . 1 9
`0.41
`
`0 . 4 3
`0.94
`0 . 4 0
`0 . 2 5
`0 . 2 2
`0 . 1 7
`0 . 1 2
`0 . 0 8
`0 . 9 9
`0.84
`0 . 6 8
`0.51
`0 . 2 6
`0 . 0 3
`0.03
`0 . 0 8
`0 . 0 6
`
`OAS
`
`-
`0 . 1 5
`0 . J 3
`0 . 1 3
`0 . 1 3
`0 . 1 4
`0 . 1 4
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`0.11
`0 . 1 1
`0 . 1 1
`
`-
`
`0 . 0 6
`
`-
`0.06
`0 . 0 3
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`0 . 0 8
`0 . 0 2
`0
`
`-
`
`0 . 3 0
`0
`0 . 3 0
`0.30
`0 . 3 3
`0 . 3 3
`0 . 3 5
`0.31
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`0 . 2 9
`0 . 3 3
`0 . 3 0
`
`-
`
`0 . 0 2
`
`-
`0 . 0 2
`0.01
`0.01
`0 . 0 3
`0 . 0 2
`0 . 0 2
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`0 . 0 2
`0 . 0 2
`0 . 0 2
`
`-
`
`* N : n a t u r a l s e d i m e n t a r y c h a b a s i t e ; S : s y n t h e t i c chabasite.
`** Me/AJ is C s / A l f o r C u C s - c h a b a s i t e a n d B a / A I f o r C u B a - c h a b a s i t e .
`
`and 200 us) using the Applied Photophysics
`Kinetic Spectrometer software. Decomposition of
`the luminescence spectra to the Gaussian curves
`and final data processing was carried out using the
`Microcal Origin 4.1 software (Microcal Software).
`
`3. Results
`
`Typical emission spectra of the
`2. Both the
`Cu'^Na-chabasite are shown in Fig.
`asymmetry of the emission spectrum and its shift
`
`Umicore AG & Co. KG
`Exhibit 1107
`Page 4 of 12
`
`

`

`Tous droits de propriété intellectuelle reserves. Reproduction et
`
`representation interdites sans autorisation (code de la propriété intellectuelle).
`
`J. Dèdeiek et al.
`
`/ Microporous and Mesoporous Materials
`
`32 ( ¡999) 63-74 6 7
`
`vt c
`0>
`c
`c
`o
`
`e
`
`1 ff
`
`wavelength (nm)
`
`F i g . 3 . E>ecomposition o f t h e emission s p e c t r u m o f
`C u * - c h a b a s i t c ( C u / A i = 0 . 3 8 ) t o G a u s s i a n b a n d s : Cu"^ emission
`s p e c t r u m ( O ) ; resulting
`ñ t t o t h e G a u s s i a n c u r v e s
`( — ) ;
`G a u s s i a n c u r v e s c o m p o s i n g s p e c t r u m ( - - ) . Cu^'^-chabasite w a s
`r e d u c e d in h y d r o g e n o f 4 x 10^ P a f o r 2 m i n a t 450®C.
`
`The decay of the C u ^ emission intensity at
`500 n m is documented in Fig. 4, where the normal­
`ised luminescence decay is shown. The dependence
`of the luminescence intensity on time followed a
`double-exponential dependence, described by
`
`I = f o [ a i e x p ( - / / T j ) + a 2 e x p í - í / i a ) ] ,
`
`( 1 )
`
`where I is the luminescence intensity at time t(t~
`0 for time of excitation), 4 is the initial lumines­
`cence intensity, Ti and r j are luminescence decay
`times and Oj and ű2
`pre-exponential factors.
`The emission centre with an emission at
`500 nm,
`both for the natural and synthetic chabasite, was
`characterised by
`the decay times
`10+5 and
`80±10fts; the lower one represents the life time
`of the lowest excited state and is used as a charac­
`teristic of the C u ^ ion located in a zeolite (see
`Refs. [22,23,30]). Owing to the strong overlap of
`the emission band at
`540 n m by the band at
`500 nm, its decay time could not be estimated.
`However, the 540 nm luminescence prevails in the
`spectra recorded at a longer time after the excita­
`2 ^is; the
`tion compared with that recorded at
`decay time of the 540 nm emission is substantially
`longer than that of the 500 nm emission.
`In order t o determine the distribution of the
`two C u ^ species in chabasite, it was necessary t o
`
`350 4 0 0 4 5 0 6 0 0 5 5 0 600 6 5 0 7 0 0
`wavelength (nm)
`
`F i g . 2. (a) N o r m a l i s e d intensity o f t h e C u ' emission o f
`Cu'^-chabasitc ( C u / A l = 0 . 3 8 ) r e c o r d e d a t
`2 ( — ) a n d 100 p s
`( - - ) a f t e r excitation. C u ^ * - c h a b a s i l e w a s reduced i n h y d r o g e n
`o f 4 X 1 0 ' P a f o r 2 m i n a t 4 5 0 ° C . ( b ) Effect o f reduction t i m e
`o f t h e C u * - c h a b a s i t e { C u / A I = 0 . 3 8 ) o n t h e normalised C u *
`emission intensity. C u ^ ^ - c h a b a s i t e w a s r e d u c e d in h y d r o g e n o f
`4 X 1 0 ' P a f o r I ( — ) a n d 6 4 m i n ( - - ) a t 4 5 0 ° C .
`
`to a longer wavelength with increasing time after
`excitation indicated the presence of at least two
`emission bands with different luminescence decays
`(Fig. 2(a)J. This was also indicated by the maxi­
`mum shifts to shorter wavelengths with increasing
`reduction time [Fig. 2(b)]. These shifts reflected
`the presence of different Cu"*" luminescence centres
`exhibiting different reducibilities in the
`Cu^"*'-»Cu'*"-*Cu° process. Decomposition of the
`emission spectra of CuNa-chabasites t o the
`Gaussian bands and second derivative mode analy­
`sis (not shown in Fig. 2 ) showed the presence of
`two emission bands with maxima at 500 ± 5 and
`5 4 0 ± 5 nm, as illustrated in Fig. 3. The decomposi­
`tion of the C a * luminescence spectra to the
`Gaussian bands was discussed in detail elsewhere
`[22,23].
`
`Umicore AG & Co. KG
`Exhibit 1107
`Page 5 of 12
`
`

`

`Tous droits de prophete inteilecłuelle reserves. Reproduction et representation interdites sans autorisation (code de la propriété intellectuelle).
`
`6 8 J. Dédeiek ei al.
`
`Materials 32 (¡999) 63-74
`
`,0
`
`Ë 0,5-
`
`0,0-
`
`0 200 400
`
`t i m e ( ^ s )
`
`a l 5 0 0 nm o f
`decay of t h e e m i s s i o n
`F i g . 4.
`i^ormaUsed
`C u ' ^ - c h a b a s i t e ( C u / A l « 0 . 0 1 ) : e x p e r i m e n t a l d a l a ( — ) ; d o u b l e -
`e x p o n e n t i a l fit
`(—^). C u ' ^ - c h a b a s i t e w a s r e d u c c d in h y d r o g e n
`o f 4 x l O ' P a f o r 2 n i i n a t 4 5 0 »C.
`
`use conditions of the Cu^^-chabasite reduction,
`denoted here as optimum conditions, which en­
`abled us
`to achieve simultaneously a maximum
`concentration of monovalent Cu"*" ions in the
`zeolite. The dependence of the integrated intensity
`of the emission bands a t 500 and 540 n m on the
`reduction time for natural Cu-chabasite is shown
`in Fig. 5, and n o difference was found using syn­
`thetic Cu-chabasite. The reduction time at which
`the maximum in normalised intensities overlapped
`was taken as the optimum reduction time. As with
`the dependence of the emission intensity on the
`reduction time, the C\i* ions corresponding to the
`emission band at 540 n m are more easily reduced
`fromCu^^ to Cu^ and from C u ^ t o Cu® compared
`with those corresponding t o the 500 n m emission.
`The effect of C u loading on the normalised
`Cu"*^ emission
`spectrum of CuNa-chabasite
`reduced at optimum conditions is shown in Fig. 6.
`With increasing concentration of the C u ^ ions in
`zeolites, the emission spectrum was shifted t o
`longer wavelengths. A larger shift was observed
`with natural chabasite [shift of the maximum of
`the emission band from
`500 t o 515 nm, see
`Fig. 6(a)J than with the synthetic Cu-chabasite of
`similar C u loading [shift from 515 t o 525 nm, see
`Fig. 6(b)j. It showed an increasing relative popula­
`tion of the Cu * ions emitting a t 540 n m compared
`
`optimum reduction time
`
`1 — . — I — . — J — I — 1 — I — I — I — J — I — [ —
`0 10 20 30 40 60 60
`time (min)
`
`F i g . 5 . T h e effect o f r é d u c t i o n t i m e o f C u * - c h a b a s i t e ( C u / A I =
`0 . 3 8 ) o n t h e n o r m a l i s e d integrated intensity o f t h e emission
`b a n d s . C u * e m i s s i o n b a n d a t
`5 0 0 ( Ü ) a n d 5 4 0 n m ( O ) ,
`C u ^ * - c h a b a s i t e w a s r e d u c c d i n h y d r o g e n o f 4 x 10^ P a f o r 2 m i n
`a t 4 5 0 ' C .
`
`with those emitting at 500 nm. This is reflected in
`the dependence of the ratio of the integrated
`emission of the 540 and 500 n m bands on the Cu
`loading, which is given in Fig.
`7. This ratio
`increased with increasing Cu loadings with both
`the natural and synthetic Cu-chabasites. On the
`other band, the population of the centre emitting
`at 540 n m was significantly higher in synthetic
`chabasite than that in the natural chabasite with
`a comparable C u loading. A t low Cu loadings,
`only the emission band at 500 n m was present in
`the spectrum of the natural Cu-chabasite. The
`dependence of the integrated intensity of the indivi­
`dual luminescence bands on the Cu concentration
`is given in Fig. 8. The intensity of the 540 n m band
`increased with increasing Cu loadings in the whole
`C u concentration range for both natural and syn­
`thetic Cu«chabasites, whereas the intensity of the
`500 n m emission was saturated at high Cu
`loadings.
`The effect of the presence of co-cations on the
`emission spectrum of the Cu"^ ions in chabasite is
`documented in Fig. 9. When Ca^^ ions are present
`in Cu-chabasite, the emission spectrum is shifted
`to a shorter wavelength, compared with the emis­
`sion spectrum of CuNa-chabasite with a similar
`Cu loading. On the contrary, the presence of Cs"^
`
`Umicore AG & Co. KG
`Exhibit 1107
`Page 6 of 12
`
`

`

`Tous droits de propriété intellectuelle reserves. Reproduction et
`
`representation interdites sans autorisation (code de la propriété Intellectuelle).
`
`J. Dèdeiek et al.
`
`/ Microporous and Mesoporous
`
`Malerials 32 ( ¡999) 63-74 6 9
`
`M
`
`c I
`
`c
`o
`
`eOO
`350 4 0 0 4 5 0 500 5 5 0
`wavelength (nm)
`
`6 5 0 7 0 0
`
`- « — r
`
`C u / A l
`
`F i g . 6 . T h e effect o f C u l o a d i n g o n t h e n o r m a l i s e d emission o f
`a ) n a t u r a l C u * - c h a b a s i t c , C u / A I 0 . 0 1 ( — ) , O . i l ( - - ) , 0 . I 7 ( — )
`a n d 0 . 3 8 ( ) ;
`( b ) Synthetic C u - c h a b a s i t e , C u / A I 0.08 (-•• ) ,
`0 . 1 5 ( - - ) a n d 0 . 3 2 ( — ) . C u ^ * - c h a b a s i t e s w e r e r e d u c e d a t o p t i ­
`m u m c o n d i t i o n s (see F i g . 5 ) .
`
`F i g . 8 . T h e effect o f t h e C u l o a d i n g o n t h e integrated emission
`intensity o f n a t u r a l ( a ) a n d synthetic ( b ) C u - c h a b a s i t e . Cu*^
`emission b a n d s a t 5 0 0 ( • ) a n d 5 4 0 n m ( O ) . Cu^'^-chabasites
`w e r e r e d u c e d a t o p t i m u m c o n d i t i o n s (see F i g . 5 ) .
`
`and co-cations is accompanied by a spectra!
`shift t o longer wavelengths. Decomposition of the
`the Gaussian bands and the second
`spectra to
`derivative mode analysis did not indicate any new
`band in the emission spectrum, and only bands
`with maxima at 500 and 540 n m were found. Thus,
`the presence of Ca^^ ions increases the relative
`intensity of the 500 n m band in the spectrum. On
`the other hand, Ba^"*" and Cs^ co-cations increase
`the relative intensity of the 540 n m band.
`Identical results t o those reported in the previ­
`ous paragraph for Cu'^-chabasite reduced in
`hydrogen at optimum conditions were also
`observed with Cu'^'-chabasite reduced in carbon
`10, where a
`monoxide. This is illustrated in Fig.
`comparison of the C u ^ emission spectra of
`Cu-chabasite reduced in hydrogen at optimum
`conditions and in carbon monoxide for 40 min is
`given. As no difference in the normalised emission
`spectra of Cu-chabasite reduced in hydrogen and
`
`o
`
`y
`
`
`
`o\
`
`\o
`
`•
`
`\ • \
`
`•
`
`1.6-
`
`1.2-
`
`0,8'
`
`0,4-
`
`0.0-
`
`o '
`
`o
`
`0,0 0,1
`
`0.2
`Cu/AI
`
`0.3 0,4
`
`F i g . 7 . T h e effect o f C u l o a d i n g o n t h e r a t i o o f integrated inten­
`sity o f t h e C u * emission b a n d s a t 5 4 0 a n d 5 0 0 n m o f synthetic
`{ • ) a n d n a t u r a l ( O ) C u - c h a b a s i t e . C u ^ * - c h a b a s i l e s w e r e
`r e d u c e d a t o p t i m u m c o n d i t i o n s (see Fig. 5 ) .
`
`Umicore AG & Co. KG
`Exhibit 1107
`Page 7 of 12
`
`

`

`Tous droits de propriété intellecluelle reserves. Reproduction et
`
`representation interdites sans autorisation (code de la propriété intellectueile).
`
`70
`
`J. Dëdeiek et al.
`
`/ Microporous and Mesoporous
`
`Materials 32 ( 1999) 63-74
`
`«)
`e

`c
`c
`o
`M

`E
`c
`•o «
`«o
`
`3S0
`
`4 0 0
`
`4 5 0 5 0 0
`wavelength ( n m )
`
`7 0 0
`
`F i g . 9 . T h e effect o f t h e presence o f co-cacions o n t h e n o r m a h s e d
`emission s p e c t r u m o f C u ' ^ - c h a b a s i t e : ( a ) synthetic C u N a - {—)
`a n d C u C a - c h a b a s i t e ( • • • ) ; ( b ) n a t u r a l C u N a - ( — ) , C u B a -
`( — ) , C u C a - ( — ) a n d C u C s - c b a b a s i l e
`( ) .
`C u ^ ^ -
`c h a b a s i t e s w e r e r e d u c e d a t o p t i m u m c o n d i t i o n s (see F i g . 5 ) .
`
`400 450 600 650 600 650
`wavelength (nm)
`
`F i g . 10. T h e effect o f t h e r e d u c t i o n a t m o s p h e r e o n t h e n o r ­
`malised emission spectra o f Cu"^-chabasite ( C u / A l =
`0 . 3 4 ) . R e d u c t i o n i n h y d r o g e n o f
`4 x 1 0 ^ P a f o r 2 m i n a l
`450®C ( — ) , a n d in c a r b o n m o n o x i d e o f 5 . 3 x 1 0 ' P a f o r 4 0 m i n
`a t 4 5 0 ' C ( - - ) .
`
`carbon monoxide was observed, we conclude that
`the population of both C u ^ emission centres a t
`500 and 540 n m depends only on the C u loading
`in the zeolite a n d n o t o n the nature of the reduction
`atmosphere. T h e intensities of the Cu"^ emission
`spectra of the Cu^^-chabasites reduced in carbon
`monoxide were slightly higher ( 2 - 5 % of integrated
`emission intensity) than those of Cu^'^-chabasites
`reduced in hydrogen. This agrees with the reported
`quantitative reduction of Cu^"^ t o C u ^ in zeolites
`by carbon monoxide reported elsewhere [22].
`
`4. Discussion
`
`N o difference was found between the Cu"^ emis­
`sion centres and their behaviour in synthetic and
`natural Cu-chabasites. All the C u ions were
`reflected in the emission spectra of synthetic and
`natural Cu-chabasite, as follows f r o m the quantita­
`tive reduction o f the Cu^^ ions evidenced by the
`V I S - N I R D R spectra. This indicates, that C u ions
`were exchanged only t o the chabasite structure
`and not incorporated into the non-zeolitic concom­
`itants present in the sedimentary natural chabasite,
`evidenced b y the disproportion in the analysis of
`natural chabasite and by the X R D diffraction [see
`Fig. 1(b)]. I t follows that the Cu"*" emission of
`natural chabasite represents only the C u ^ ions a t
`cationic sites of the chabasite structure.
`T h e Cu"*" luminescence bands a t 500 and 540 n m
`can correspond t o two different emission centres,
`formed by (i) single Cu"^ ions in two different
`cationic sites
`o r (ii) single C u ^ ions a n d
`Cu"^ •••Cu'^ pairs, exhibiting different dependences
`on the C u concentration.
`Considering point ( i ) first, the intensity of two
`emission bands corresponding t o the C u ^ ions in
`two cationic sites in a zeolite should increase o r
`should be saturated. This concentration depen­
`dence o f the luminescence intensity is schematically
`depicted in Fig. 11(a).
`N o w considering point (ii), the intensity of the
`band corresponding t o the single ion should
`increase with the C u concentration, reach a maxi­
`m u m and, a t high C u loadings, when C u ^ " C u ^
`pairs are formed by localisation of the second
`C u ^ ion in the vicinity of the single Cu"*" ion, it
`
`Umicore AG & Co. KG
`Exhibit 1107
`Page 8 of 12
`
`

`

`Tous droits de propriété intellectuelle resen/es. Reproduction et
`
`representation interdites sans autorisation (code de la propriété intellectuelle).
`
`J. Dédefek el al.
`
`/ Microporous and Mesoporous Materials
`
`32 ( ¡999) 63-74
`
`71
`
`loading (see Fig. 8). This indicates that both bands
`correspond t o single Cu"*^ ions located in two
`different cationic sites. This assignment of the
`Cu^ emission bands t o the single Cu"^ ions is also
`supported by the effect of Ca^^, Cs^ and Ba^^
`co-cations on
`the emission spectra, as is dis­
`cussed below.
`The cationic sites in dehydrated chabasite are
`well known [19,32-36] and are shown schemati­
`cally in Fig. 12. Cations in site I (notation accord­
`ing t o Refs. [32-36]) are located in the chabasite
`cavity and coordinated t o three framework oxygen
`atoms of the regular six-membered ring above the
`six-membered ring plane. Their coordination
`exhibits C^y symmetry. Site II of the chabasite
`cavity is occupied only in partially hydrated cha-
`basites and is not given in Fig. 12. Site UI is inside
`the hexagonal prism, and metal ions are supposed
`to be coordinated to six framework oxygen atoms
`with pseudooctahedral symmetry (OiJ. Site IV
`corresponds t o the cations located in the eight-
`membered ring connecting the chabasite cavities.
`The cation position in the eight-membered ring
`and the number of the coordinated framework
`oxygen atoms depend on the nature of the cation.
`Large cations (Cs"^) are located in the ring centre
`and coordinated t o four oxygen atoms. Smaller
`cations (Ag"^, Mn^^) are assumed t o be coordi­
`nated to four or three oxygen atoms and located
`off the centre of the eight-membered ring (the
`position suggested for these small cations is indi­
`cated in Fig. 12).
`
`m
`
`F i g . 12. C a t i o n i c sites in d e h y d r a t e d c h a b a s i t e a n d t h e i r n o t a ­
`tion a c c o r d i n g t o R e f s . ( 3 2 - 3 6 j .
`
`0 50 100
`
`degree of Cu* exchange (%)
`
`F i g . 11. S c h e m a t i c d e p e n d e n c e o f t h e intensity o f C u emission
`o n t h e C u loading, ( a ) T w o emission c e n t r e s c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o
`t w o différent c a t í o n i c sites ( a . b ) w i t h different p r e f e r e n c e in
`site o c c u p a t i o n a n d n u m b e r o f individual sites
`A^bt A / , + A ' b = A ^ ) . TTie emission intensity o f preferentially
`f o r m e d emission c e n t r e s follows t h e e q u a t i o n
`\ —expi—p^n)\, t h e emission intensity o f t h e emission
`/ ,
`c e n t r e f o r m e d b y a l o w p r e f e r e n w follows t h e e q u a t i o n
`/»i«)]}» w h e r e t h e p a r a m e t e r a , i n c l u d e s
`4 = « i > { « — ^ » [ 1 —
`t h e q u a n t u m yield o f t h e radiative t r a n s i t i o n , p r o b a b i l i t y o f t h e
`a b s o r p t i o n a n d t h e t i m e d e p e n d e n c e o f t h e emission, a n d n is
`t h e n u m b e r o f t h e C u ' ^ i o n s in t h e zeolite, ( b ) T w o emission
`c e n t r e s c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o t h e single C u * Ion a n d Cu"^ p a i r . T h e
`e m i s s i o n intensity o f t h e single Cu*^ i o n s follows t h e e q u a t i o n
`/ , = « , ! A/{1—íA:p[-{l - } ^ flj)));
`t h e e m i s s i o n intensity c o r ­
`r e s p o n d i n g t o C u * p a i r s f o l l o w s t h e e q u a t i o n
`4
`i ^
`{
`1
`(
`1 — Ij ^—"!))}) w h e n n o difference
`i s s u p p o s e d f o r o c c u p a t i o n o f t h e site b y a single C u * i o n a n d
`f o r siting o f t h e C u * i o n s i n t h e vicinity o f a n o t h e r o n e .
`
`should decrease t o a level close t o zero. O n the
`other hand, the intensity of the band corresponding
`t o the Cu"^---Cu'^ pairs should increase in the
`whole concentration range. This model is
`illustrated in Fig. 11 (b).
`However, neither of the intensities of the emis­
`sion bands at 500 or 540 n m decrease with C u
`
`Umicore AG & Co. KG
`Exhibit 1107
`Page 9 of 12
`
`

`

`Tous droits de propriété intellectueile reserves. Reproduction et
`
`representation interdites sans autorisation (code de la propriété intellectuelle).
`
`7 2
`
`J. Dèd

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket