throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UMICORE AG & CO. KG,
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`BASF CORPORATION
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case No. IPR2015-01124
`U.S. Patent No. 8,404,203
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER COMBINED MOTION TO SEAL AND MOTION FOR
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01124
`Patent No. 8,404,203
`Patent Owner Motion to Seal and Motion for Protective Order
`
`
`
`Patent Owner BASF Corporation (“Patent Owner”) hereby moves for entry
`
`of the Protective Order appended below as Addendum A and further moves to seal
`
`certain highly confidential and competitively sensitive exhibits submitted with its
`
`Patent Owner Response, as described herein. Petitioner Umicore AG &Co. KG
`
`(“Petitioner”) has not provided its position on the motion to file under seal or the
`
`motion for entry of the Protective Order, however Petitioner indicated that it will
`
`provide its position after reviewing the exhibits. Petitioner has agreed that until the
`
`present combined motion is decided, the confidential exhibits will be treated as
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner submits its Response concurrently with the filing of this
`
`combined motion. In support of its Response, Patent Owner submits certain
`
`documents designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`
`ONLY by Patent Owner. Patent Owner submits that these supporting exhibits are
`
`confidential and competitively sensitive and must be properly sealed in order to
`
`protect its highly confidential business information from disclosure to its direct
`
`competitor’s employees and the general public.
`
`I. MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`Patent Owner moves to seal portions of the declaration of Dr. Ahmad Moini
`
`(Exhibit 2019) and the declaration of Olivia Schmidt (Exhibit 2034) submitted
`
`with this motion. Patent Owner has concurrently filed a redacted declaration of Dr.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01124
`Patent No. 8,404,203
`Patent Owner Motion to Seal and Motion for Protective Order
`
`Ahmad Moini and a redacted declaration of Olivia Schmidt. Patent Owner has
`
`served Petitioner with both confidential and redacted versions of the Response and
`
`supporting exhibits.
`
`
`
`These declarations include competitively sensitive business information of
`
`Patent Owner. This highly confidential business information includes non-public
`
`technical information regarding the composition of Patent Owner’s commercial
`
`products (in Exhibit 2019) and confidential market share information regarding the
`
`relevant market for such products (in Exhibit 2034).
`
`
`
`The record of an inter partes review proceeding, including documents and
`
`things, is made available to the public, except as otherwise ordered. 37 C.F.R. §
`
`2.14. But despite the default rule of public availability, the Board will seal
`
`confidential information for “good cause,” because it is necessary to “strike a
`
`balance between the public’s interest in maintaining a complete and
`
`understandable file history and the parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive
`
`information.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.54(a); 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`As laid out in the Office Trial Practice Guide, the Board treats confidential
`
`information “consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which
`
`provides for protective orders for trade secret or other confidential research,
`
`development, or commercial information.” Id. at 48760. Patent Owner submits
`
`that good cause to seal Exhibits 2019 and 2034 exists.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01124
`Patent No. 8,404,203
`Patent Owner Motion to Seal and Motion for Protective Order
`
`
`
`Petitioner in this proceeding is a direct competitor. In fact, Petitioner is one
`
`of only three major companies in the relevant market, including Patent Owner. If
`
`the highly confidential composition of its products and the related market share
`
`information were disclosed publicly or to the Petitioner’s employees, this
`
`disclosure would cause competitive business harm to Patent Owner.
`
`In other inter partes review proceedings, the Board has found good cause to
`
`seal sensitive and confidential trade secret information like that contained in
`
`Exhibit 2019. See, e.g., First Quality Baby Products, LLC v. Kimberly-Clark
`
`Worldwide, Inc., IPR2014-01024, Paper 56, at 32 (PTAB December 14,
`
`2015). Exhibit 2019 discusses the composition of Patent Owner’s commercially
`
`available product and its contents are competitively sensitive information that
`
`would cause competitive harm to Patent Owner if its contents were disclosed to
`
`employees of Petitioner, who is a direct competitor, or the general public. The
`
`sealing of Exhibit 2019 will not inhibit the general public from understanding the
`
`underlying arguments and evidence that Patent Owner is relying upon in the public
`
`versions of its filings.
`
`Further, as evidenced by other inter partes review proceedings, the Board
`
`has held that confidential information such as the confidential market share
`
`information can be sealed. See, e.g., Baby Trend, Inc. v. Wonderland
`
`Nurserygoods Co., Ltd., IPR2015-00841, Paper 35, at 3 (PTAB November 17,
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01124
`Patent No. 8,404,203
`Patent Owner Motion to Seal and Motion for Protective Order
`
`2015). In Baby Trend, the Board held that market share information that was not
`
`otherwise public was evidence that good cause existed for sealing this
`
`information. Id. The sealing of this competitively sensitive and confidential
`
`market share information will not inhibit the general public from understanding the
`
`underlying arguments and evidence that Patent Owner is relying upon in the public
`
`versions of its filings.
`
`
`
`As stated above, Patent Owner’s undersigned counsel certifies that Patent
`
`Owner has in good faith attempted to confer with Petitioner as to the entry of the
`
`Proposed Protective Order, but Petitioner has elected to review the confidential
`
`exhibits prior to providing its position.
`
`II. MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`The parties have met and conferred regarding the entry of a protective order,
`
`which is appended as Addendum A. The proposed Protective Order is consistent
`
`with the Default Protective Order of this Board with certain edits applicable to this
`
`case. A redline of these edits is appended as Addendum B.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s undersigned counsel certifies that Patent Owner has in good
`
`faith attempted to confer with Petitioner regarding the entry of a Protective Order
`
`however counsel for Petitioner has stated that it would state its position on the
`
`Protective Order until after having reviewed the present motion.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01124
`Patent No. 8,404,203
`Patent Owner Motion to Seal and Motion for Protective Order
`
`III. CERTIFICATION OF NON-PUBLICATION
`
`
`
`On behalf of Patent Owner, the undersigned counsel certifies that the
`
`information sought to be sealed by this Motion has not, to their knowledge, been
`
`published or otherwise made public.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`grant the combined motion to seal Exhibits 2019 and 2034 as HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY and for entry of the protective
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /
`
` Anish R. Desai /
`Brian E. Ferguson (Reg. No. 36,801)
`Anish R. Desai (Reg. No. 73,760)
`Gary A. Coad (Pro Hac Vice)
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`T: 202-682-7000
`brian.ferguson@weil.com
`anish.desai@weil.com
`
`6
`
`order appended as Addendum A.
`
`
`
`Dated: February 12, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01124
`Patent No. 8,404,203
`Patent Owner Motion to Seal and Motion for Protective Order
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on February 12, 2016, the foregoing
`
`PATENT OWNER MOTION TO SEAL AND MOTION FOR
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER was served via electronic mail, upon the following:
`
`Elizabeth Gardner
`Richard L. DeLucia
`K. Patrick Herman
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
`51 West 52nd Street
`New York, NY 10019-6142
`egardner@orrick.com
`rdelucia@orrick.com
`pherman@orrick.com
`
`
`/ Timothy J. Andersen / c
`Timothy J. Andersen
`Case Manager
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`T: 202-682-7075
`timothy.andersen@weil.com
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`ADDENDUM A
`
`ADDENDUM A
`
`

`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UMICORE AG & CO. KG,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`BASF CORPORATION
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01121
`IPR2015-01125
`U.S. Patent 7,601,662
`
`IPR2015-01123
`IPR2015-01124
`U.S. Patent 8,404,203
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`WHEREAS, Patent Owner BASF Corporation Inc. is a private entity that
`
`desires to keep confidential, in good faith, information that is not reasonably
`
`believed to be in the public domain;
`
`WHEREAS, Petitioner Umicore AG & Co. KG is a direct competitor of
`
`Patent Owner in the market for goods covered by the challenged patents, U.S.
`
`Patent Nos. 7,601,662 and 8,404,203; and
`
`WHEREAS, to promote fairness and efficiency in this proceeding without
`
`the need to seek a separate protective order for each competitively sensitive
`
`document and/or any competitively sensitive information requested or exchanged,
`
`including, but not limited to, trade secrets or other confidential research,
`
`development or other commercial information;
`
`Patent Owner HEREBY RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS that the parties be
`
`ordered to conduct their activities related to IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123,
`
`IPR2015-01124, and IPR2015-01125 in accordance with the following:
`
`
`
`1.
`
`Confidential Information shall be clearly marked “CONFIDENTIAL -
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”' Confidential Information is information disclosed
`
`by one party to the other, which, if in written, graphic, machine-readable or other
`
`

`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`
`tangible form is marked as “CONFIDENTIAL - PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`MATERIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or
`
`which, if disclosed orally or by demonstration, is identified at the time of initial
`
`disclosure as confidential. Confidential Information shall not include any
`
`information which (i) the parties agree, or the Board rules, is already public
`
`knowledge, (ii) the parties agree, or the Board rules, has become public knowledge
`
`other than as a result of disclosure by the receiving party, (iii) is in the receiving
`
`party's legitimate possession independently of the producing party, or (iv) is
`
`deemed by the Board not to meet standards necessary for filing under seal, or
`
`otherwise is not entitled to protection.
`
`2.
`
`Unless otherwise provided herein, redacted copies of documents may
`
`be produced where the redacted portions contain privileged matter. Any redacting
`
`must be done such that the redacting is conspicuous.
`
`3.
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`Information may be disclosed only to:
`
`(A)
`
`Outside counsel of record for a party in the proceeding.
`
`All in-house counsel and other representatives of the parties (other than outside
`
`counsel of record) shall not be allowed to view HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Information.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`(B)
`
`Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding
`
`who are not employed by any party, not a competitor to any party, and not a
`
`consultant for, or employed by, such a competitor with respect to the subject matter
`
`of the proceeding and certify in accordance with and sign the Standard
`
`Acknowledgment for Access to Protective Order Material ("Acknowledgment"),
`
`which is attached to this Protective Order as Exhibit A.
`
`(C)
`
`The Office. Employees and representatives of the U.S.
`
`Patent and Trademark Office and Patent and Trademark Appeals Board who have
`
`a need for access to the information shall have such access without the requirement
`
`to sign the Acknowledgement. Such employees and representatives shall include
`
`the Director, members of the Board and their clerical staff, other support personnel,
`
`court reporters, and other persons acting on behalf of the Office.
`
`(D)
`
`Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical
`
`staff, court reporters, outside copying and exhibit preparation services and other
`
`support personnel of the foregoing persons who are reasonably necessary to assist
`
`those persons in the proceeding and who execute the Acknowledgement.
`
`4.
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL may be
`
`disclosed only to the following individuals:
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`(A)
`
`Above Personnel. Those persons or entities identified in
`
`paragraph 3 of this Protective Order under the conditions set forth in that
`
`paragraph.
`
`(B)
`
`Parties to the Present Proceeding. Persons who are
`
`owners of a patent involved in the proceeding and other persons who are named
`
`parties to the proceeding, who sign the Acknowledgment.
`
`(C)
`
`In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party who signs
`
`the Acknowledgement.
`
`(D)
`
`Other Employees of a Party. No more than two (2)
`
`employees of each party who have been designated to assist with this matter who
`
`sign the Acknowledgement.
`
`5.
`
`Persons receiving Confidential Information shall use reasonable
`
`efforts to maintain the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
`(A)
`
`Maintaining such information in a secure location to
`
`which persons not authorized to receive the information shall not have access;
`
`(B)
`
`Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the
`
`confidentiality of the information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those
`
`the receiving party uses to maintain the confidentiality of information not received
`
`from the disclosing party;
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`(C)
`
`Ensuring that support personnel of the receiving party
`
`who have access to the Confidential Information understand and abide by the
`
`obligation to maintain the confidentiality of information received that is designated
`
`as confidential; and
`
`(D)
`
`Limiting the copying of Confidential Information to a
`
`reasonable number of copies needed for conduct of the proceeding and maintaining
`
`a record of the locations of such copies.
`
`6.
`
`Persons receiving Confidential Information shall use the following
`
`procedures to maintain the confidentiality of the information:
`
`(A)
`
`Documents and Information Filed with the Board by the
`
`party that designated the Documents and Information as Confidential Information.
`
`(i) A party may file its documents or information with the
`
`Board under seal, together with a non-confidential description of the nature
`
`of the Confidential Information that is under seal and the reasons why the
`
`documents or information is being filed under seal. The documents or
`
`information shall be treated as confidential and remain under seal until the
`
`Board determines that the documents or information do not qualify for
`
`confidential treatment.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`(ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of
`
`the information submitted to the Board, the submitting party shall file
`
`confidential and non-confidential versions of its submission, together with a
`
`Motion to Seal the confidential version setting forth the reasons why the
`
`information redacted from the non-confidential version is confidential and
`
`should not be made publicly available. The non-confidential version of the
`
`submission shall clearly indicate the locations of information that has been
`
`redacted. The confidential version of the submission shall be filed under
`
`seal. The confidential version of the submission shall remain under seal until
`
`the Board determines that some or all of the redacted information does not
`
`qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(B)
`
`Documents and Information Filed with the Board by a
`
`party that received Documents and Information ("receiving party") from another
`
`party that designated the Documents and Information as Confidential Information
`
`("designating party").
`
`(i) Where confidentiality is alleged as to all of the
`
`information to be submitted to the board: The receiving party shall, to the
`
`extent practicable, provide 7 days’ notice to the designating party of its
`
`intent to file Confidential Information with the Board and specifically
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`identify such Confidential Information. The parties agree that this 7 day
`
`notice requirement is intended to facilitate an orderly process for addressing
`
`legitimate confidentiality concerns and apportion responsibility such that the
`
`designating party is responsible for establishing that its Confidential
`
`Information is entitled to protection from disclosure and for providing non-
`
`confidential descriptions of its Confidential Information, and that the
`
`receiving party is responsible for redacting Confidential Information from its
`
`public filings and for filing under seal any documents that contain a
`
`designating party’s Confidential Information . This notice requirement is not
`
`intended as any limitation on what information may be included in any
`
`submission to the Board by a receiving party. Nothing in this paragraph shall
`
`be understood or interpreted to preclude a receiving party from identifying to
`
`the designating party other information to be submitted to the board after the
`
`7 day notice point, but the receiving party shall use best efforts so as to not
`
`provide any notice less than 2 days. The designating party shall provide the
`
`receiving party with a non-confidential description of the nature of the
`
`Confidential Information 1 day before the date that the receiving party
`
`intends to file the Confidential Information with the Board. The designating
`
`party shall also prepare the reasons why it believes the information is
`
`confidential and should not be made available to the public. The designating
`
`7
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`party shall file such reasons with the Board on the day that the receiving
`
`party files the Confidential with the Board on the day that Information with
`
`the Board. The receiving party must file the designating party's non-
`
`confidential description of the nature of the Confidential Information that is
`
`under seal. Any Confidential Information or submissions containing
`
`Confidential Information filed under seal shall be treated as confidential and
`
`remain under seal until the Board determines that the documents or
`
`information do not qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of
`
`the information submitted to the Board: The receiving party shall provide 7
`
`days’ notice to the designating party of its intent to file Confidential
`
`Information with the Board and specifically identify such Confidential
`
`Information. The parties agree that this seven day notice requirement is
`
`intended to facilitate an Orderly process for addressing legitimate
`
`confidentiality concerns and apportion responsibility such that the
`
`designating party is responsible for establishing that its Confidential
`
`Information is entitled to protection from disclosure, and for redacting
`
`Confidential Information from its documents to create non-confidential
`
`versions of such documents, and that the receiving party is responsible for
`
`redacting Confidential Information from its public filings and for filing
`
`8
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`under seal any documents that contain a designating party's Confidential
`
`Information. This notice requirement is not intended as any limitation of
`
`what information may be included in any submission to the Board by a
`
`receiving party. Nothing in this paragraph shall be understood or interpreted
`
`to preclude a receiving party from identifying to the designating party other
`
`information to be submitted to the board after the seven day notice point, but
`
`the receiving party shall use best efforts so as to not provide notice of less
`
`than 2 days. The designating party shall prepare non-confidential versions of
`
`its documents containing Confidential Information that the receiving party
`
`intends to file with the Board as well as a Motion to Seal the confidential
`
`versions setting forth the reasons why the information redacted from the
`
`non-confidential versions is confidential and should not be made publicly
`
`available. The non-confidential version shall clearly indicate the locations of
`
`information that has been redacted. The designating party shall send the non-
`
`confidential versions of its documents to the receiving party 1 day before the
`
`receiving party intends to submit the Confidential Information to the Board.
`
`The receiving party shall file the confidential and non-confidential versions.
`
`The designating party shall file the Motion to Seal on the day that the
`
`Confidential Information is filed with the Board by the receiving party. The
`
`redacted information shall remain under seal until the Board determines that
`
`9
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`some or all of the redacted information does not qualify for confidential
`
`treatment.
`
`(C)
`
`Documents and Information Exchanged Among the
`
`Parties. Information designated as Confidential Information that is disclosed to
`
`another party during discovery or other proceedings before the Board shall be
`
`clearly marked as “CONFIDENTIAL - PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL” or
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” respectively, and
`
`shall be exchanged in a manner that maintains its confidentiality.
`
`(D)
`
`Adherence to Code of Federal Regulations and Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide. Nothing in this paragraph 6 is intended to alter the
`
`standards applicable to a determination of whether any information is entitled to be
`
`maintained in confidence, without a public right of access. In addition, nothing in
`
`this paragraph 6 is intended to alter the procedural obligations of a party to move to
`
`seal and otherwise make a showing that the information is entitled to remain under
`
`seal, as those obligations are set forth in the Board's Rules. The parties specifically
`
`acknowledge and do not intend to alter the standards and obligations imposed by
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.54 and the Office Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760
`
`(Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`7.
`
`All Confidential Information, whether marked as “CONFIDENTIAL -
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” shall be used only for this proceeding and shall not
`
`be used for any other purpose.
`
`8.
`
`Nothing in this Order shall be construed as an agreement by a
`
`receiving party that any information designated by a producing party as
`
`Confidential Information meets any standards for filing materials under seal. The
`
`parties acknowledge that any party may challenge the designation of any
`
`information as Confidential Information, and agreement to this order shall not be
`
`used to oppose any challenge to the designation or opposition to any request to seal
`
`papers containing information designated by a party as Confidential Information.
`
`All parties shall adhere to the requirements of this Order until such a time as relief
`
`from the Order is granted by the Board or a court of competent jurisdiction.
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`EXHIBIT A
`UMICORE AG & CO. KG, v. BASF CORPORATION
`IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01125
`U.S. Patent 7,601,662
`IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124
`U.S. Patent 8,404,203
`
`Standard Acknowledgment for Access to Protective Order Material
`
`I ______________________________________, affirm that I have read the
`
`Protective Order; that I will abide by its terms; that I will use the confidential
`
`information only in connection with this proceeding and for no other purpose; that
`
`I will only allow access to support staff who are reasonably necessary to assist me
`
`in this proceeding; that prior to any disclosure to such support staff I informed or
`
`will inform them of the requirements of the Protective Order; that I am personally
`
`responsible for the requirements of the terms of the Protective Order and I agree to
`
`submit to the jurisdiction of the Office and the United States District Court for the
`
`Eastern District of Virginia for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective
`
`Order and providing remedies for its breach.
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`ADDENDUM B
`
`ADDENDUM B
`
`

`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UMICORE AG & CO. KG,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`BASF CORPORATION
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01121
`IPR2015-01125
`U.S. Patent 7,601,662
`
`IPR2015-01123
`IPR2015-01124
`U.S. Patent 8,404,203
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Protective Order
`(IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125)
`
`WHEREAS, Patent Owner BASF Corporation Inc. is a private entity that
`
`desires to keep confidential, in good faith, information that is not reasonably
`
`believed to be in the public domain;
`
`WHEREAS, Petitioner Umicore AG & Co. KG is a direct competitor of
`
`Patent Owner in the market for goods covered by the challenged patents, U.S.
`
`Patent Nos. 7,601,662 and 8,404,203; and
`
`WHEREAS, to promote fairness and efficiency in this proceeding without
`
`the need to seek a separate protective order for each competitively sensitive
`
`document and/or any competitively sensitive information requested or exchanged,
`
`including, but not limited to, trade secrets or other confidential research,
`
`development or other commercial information;
`
`Patent Owner HEREBY RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS that the parties be
`
`ordered to conduct their activities related to IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123,
`
`IPR2015-01124, and IPR2015-01125 in accordance with the following:
`
`
`
`1.
`
`Confidential Information shall be clearly marked “CONFIDENTIAL -
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”' Confidential Information is information disclosed
`
`by one party to the other, which, if in written, graphic, machine-readable or other
`
`

`
`
`
`tangible form is marked as “CONFIDENTIAL - PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`MATERIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or
`
`which, if disclosed orally or by demonstration, is identified at the time of initial
`
`disclosure as confidential. Confidential Information shall not include any
`
`information which (i) the parties agree, or the Board rules, is already public
`
`knowledge, (ii) the parties agree, or the Board rules, has become public knowledge
`
`other than as a result of disclosure by the receiving party, (iii) is in the receiving
`
`party's legitimate possession independently of the producing party, or (iv) is
`
`deemed by the Board not to meet standards necessary for filing under seal, or
`
`otherwise is not entitled to protection.
`
`2.
`
`Unless otherwise provided herein, redacted copies of documents may
`
`be produced where the redacted portions contain privileged matter. Any redacting
`
`must be done such that the redacting is conspicuous.
`
`3.
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`Information may be disclosed only to:
`
`(A)
`
`Outside counsel of record for a party in the proceeding.
`
`All in-house counsel and other representatives of the parties (other than outside
`
`counsel of record) shall not be allowed to view HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Information.
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`1. Confidential information shall be clearly marked “PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`MATERIAL.”
`
`2. Access to confidential information is limited to the following individuals who
`
`have executed the acknowledgment appended to this order:
`
`(A) Parties. Persons who are owners of a patent involved in the proceeding and
`
`other persons who are named parties to the proceeding.
`
`(B) Party Representatives. Representatives of record for a party in the proceeding.
`
`(B)
`
`(C) Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding
`
`who further certify in the Acknowledgement that they areare not employed by any
`
`party, not a competitor to any party, orand not a consultant for, or employed by,
`
`such a competitor with respect to the subject matter of the proceeding and certify
`
`in accordance with and sign the Standard Acknowledgment for Access to
`
`Protective Order Material ("Acknowledgment"), which is attached to this
`
`Protective Order as Exhibit A.
`
`(D) In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
`(E) Other Employees of a Party. Employees, consultants or other persons
`
`performing work for a party, other than in-house counsel and in-house counsel’s
`
`support staff, who sign the Acknowledgement shall be extended access to
`
`confidential information only upon agreement of the parties or by order of the
`
`3
`
`

`
`
`
`Board upon a motion brought by the party seeking to disclose confidential
`
`information to that person. The party opposing disclosure to that person shall have
`
`the burden of proving that such person should be restricted from access to
`
`confidential information.
`
`(C)
`
`(F) The Office. Employees and representatives of the
`
`OfficeU.S. Patent and Trademark Office and Patent and Trademark Appeals Board
`
`who have a need for access to the confidential information shall have such access
`
`without the requirement to sign anthe Acknowledgement. Such employees and
`
`representatives shall include the Director, members of the Board and their clerical
`
`staff, other support personnel, court reporters, and other persons acting on behalf of
`
`the Office.
`
`(D)
`
`(G) Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical
`
`staff, court reporters, outside copying and exhibit preparation services and other
`
`support personnel of the foregoing persons who are reasonably necessary to assist
`
`those persons in the proceeding shall not be required to sign anand who execute the
`
`Acknowledgement, but shall be informed of the terms and requirements of the
`
`Protective Order by the person they are supporting who receives confidential
`
`information.
`
`4
`
`

`
`
`
`4.
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL may be
`
`disclosed only to the following individuals:
`
`(A)
`
`Above Personnel. Those persons or entities identified in
`
`paragraph 3 of this Protective Order under the conditions set forth in that
`
`paragraph.
`
`(B)
`
`Parties to the Present Proceeding. Persons who are
`
`owners of a patent involved in the proceeding and other persons who are named
`
`parties to the proceeding, who sign the Acknowledgment.
`
`(C)
`
`In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party who signs
`
`the Acknowledgement.
`
`(D)
`
`Other Employees of a Party. No more than two (2)
`
`employees of each party who have been designated to assist with this matter who
`
`sign the Acknowledgement.
`
`5.
`
`3. Persons receiving cConfidential iInformation shall use reasonable
`
`efforts to maintain the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
`(A)
`
`Maintaining such information in a secure location to
`
`which persons not authorized to receive the information shall not have access;
`
`(B)
`
`Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the
`
`confidentiality of the information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those
`
`5
`
`

`
`
`
`the recipientreceiving party uses to maintain the confidentiality of information not
`
`received from the disclosing party;
`
`(C)
`
`Ensuring that support personnel of the recipientreceiving
`
`party who have access to the cConfidential iInformation understand and abide by
`
`the obligation to maintain the confidentiality of information received that is
`
`designated as confidential; and
`
`(D)
`
`Limiting the copying of cConfidential iInformation to a
`
`reason

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket