throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`UMICORE AG & CO. KG,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`BASF CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2015-01124
`Patent No.8,404,203
`
`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION UNDER
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01124
`U.S. Patent No. 8,404,203
`Patent Owner’s Motion for PHV Admission
`
`
`Patent Owner BASF Corporation (“Patent Owner”) files this motion for pro
`
`hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), as authorized in the Notice of
`
`Filing Date Accorded, Paper No. 3. The Board requires that such motions be filed
`
`in accordance with the “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission”
`
`in Case IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (“Order”).
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board recognize Mr. Gary A.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Coad as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`1.
`
`Time for Filing
`
`This motion for pro hac vice admission is filed no sooner than twenty-one
`
`(21) days after service of the petition, as required by the Order.
`
`2.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`The following statement of fact shows that there is good cause for the Board
`
`to recognize Mr. Coad pro hac vice.
`
`Mr. Coad is an experienced litigation attorney, and has been involved in
`
`numerous litigations involving patent infringement in District Courts across the
`
`country. Mr. Coad’s biography is attached hereto as Ex. BASF-2016.
`
`Further, counsel for Petitioner does not oppose Mr. Coad appearing pro hac
`
`vice during this proceeding.
`
`Therefore, Patent Owner respectfully submits that there is good cause for the
`
`Board to recognize Mr. Coad as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01124
`U.S. Patent No. 8,404,203
`Patent Owner’s Motion for PHV Admission
`
`
`3.
`
`Affidavit or Declaration of Individual Seeking to Appear
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by the declaration
`
`of Mr. Gary A. Coad, as required by authorization of the Board.
`
`Dated: January 11, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Brian E. Ferguson / e
`Brian E. Ferguson (Reg. 36,801)
`Anish R. Desai (Reg. 73,760)
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW
`Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: 202-682-7000
`Fax: 202-857-0940
`
`


`
`


`
`


`
`


`
`


`
`


`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`


`
`

`
`IPR2015-01124
`U.S. Patent No. 8,404,203
`Patent Owner’s Motion for PHV Admission
`
`
`DECLARATION OF MR. GARY A. COAD IN SUPPORT OF
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`
`
`I, Gary A. Coad, am over eighteen years of age and would be competent
`
`to testify as to the matters set forth herein if called upon to do so.
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney in the law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP. I
`
`have over 3 years of experience as a patent litigator and have represented clients
`
`in numerous patent litigation cases in various United States District Courts, the
`
`International Trade Commission, and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
`
`2. My educational and professional backgrounds make me familiar
`
`with the subject matter at hand. See Exhibit 2016. I am comfortable and
`
`experienced with technically and legally complex matters such as will be present
`
`in this proceeding.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the state bar of Virginia and the
`
`bar of the District of Columbia, as well as the United States District Court for the
`
`Eastern District of Virginia.
`
`4.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body denied.
`
`6.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by
`
`any court or administrative body.
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01124
`U.S. Patent No. 8,404,203
`Patent Owner’s Motion for PHV Admission
`
`
`7.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice in any proceedings before
`
`the USPTO in the last three years.
`
`8.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37
`
`C.F.R.
`
`9.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 11.19(a).
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Declaration is true and
`
`
`
`/ Gary A. Coad /
`Gary A. Coad
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: 202-682-7146
`Fax: 202-857-0940
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`correct.
`
`Date: January 11, 2016
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01124
`U.S. Patent No. 8,404,203
`Patent Owner’s Motion for PHV Admission
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of MOTION FOR PRO HAC
`
`VICE ADMISSION UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, a copy of the Declaration of
`
`Gary A. Coad in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Exhibit 2016
`
`was served via email on the date below, upon the following:
`
`Elizabeth Gardner
`Richard L. DeLucia
`K. Patrick Herman
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
`51 West 52nd Street
`New York, NY 10019-6142
`egardner@orrick.com
`rdelucia@orrick.com
`pherman@orrick.com
`
`
`Dated: January 11, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`/ Timothy J. Andersen /
`Timothy J. Andersen
`Paralegal
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street NW
`Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: 202-682-7075
`timothy.andersen@weil.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket