throbber
Molecular Sieves of Chabazite Structure
`
`343
`
`EFFECT OF FRAMEWORK CHARGE DENSITY ON CATALYTIC
`ACTIVITY OF COPPER LOADED MOLECULAR SIEVES OF CHABAZITE
`STRUCTURE IN NITROGEN(II) OXIDE DECOMPOSITION
`
`Jiří DĚDEČEK1,*, Alena VONDROVÁ2 and Jiří ČEJKA3
`J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic,
`182 23 Prague 8, Czech Republic; e-mail: 1 dedecek@jh-inst.cas.cz, 2 vondrova@jh-inst.cas.cz,
`3 cejka@jh-inst.cas.cz
`
`Received December 15, 1999
`Accepted February 23, 2000
`
`NO decomposition over Cu-loaded molecular sieves of chabazite structure with different
`framework negative charge density was investigated. Cu-ZnAlPO-34 with framework charge
`density (Al + P)/Zn = 15 exhibited high and stable catalytic activity in NO decomposition
`while Cu-chabazite with Si/Al = 2.7 was inactive. This evidences that the number of alumi-
`num atoms balancing Cu ions in cationic sites controls the catalytic activity of Cu ion. Ions
`balanced by single framework aluminum atoms exhibit high activity in NO decomposition
`while ions balanced by two framework aluminum atoms are inactive. Topology of cationic
`sites is not the limiting parameter for NO decomposition over Cu ions located in molecular
`sieves.
`Key words: NO decomposition; Cu ion; Chabazite; ZnAlPO-34; Molecular sieve; Zeolites;
`Heterogeneous catalysis.
`
`Nitrogen oxides (NOx) produced in high-temperature combustion processes
`are major air pollutants at present. Decomposition of NO into molecular ni-
`trogen and oxygen seems to be a very attractive approach to control the
`NOx pollution. Despite the substantial effort being currently devoted to de-
`velopment of a suitable catalyst exhibiting high and stable activity in NO
`decomposition, this challenge has not yet been solved. High catalytic activ-
`ity has been found only for Cu ions implanted at the cationic sites of zeo-
`lite matrices, namely with Cu-ZSM-5 (refs1–6). Nevertheless, for industrial
`application of this process, the conversion is still low; moreover, Cu-ZSM-5
`activity is sensitive to the presence of water vapor and SOx. Despite this
`fact, Cu-loaded zeolites attract high attention as the most important model
`system for the investigation of NO decomposition.
`Isolated Cu+ ions, adjacent Cu and O centers and two neighboring Cu
`ions (Cu pairs), were suggested to be active in NO decomposition7–22. By a
`
`Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. (Vol. 65) (2000)
`
`Exhibit 2015.001
`
`

`
`344
`
`Dědeček, Vondrová, Čejka:
`
`detailed spectral analysis, we have shown19–21 that the Cu site active in NO
`decomposition possesses a low positive charge on the divalent Cu cation, is
`easily reduced, exhibits open, close to planar coordination sphere and is ad-
`jacent to a single Al framework atom. Recently, we have suggested one type
`of six-member ring, located in the straight channel of ZSM-5, to accommo-
`date Cu ions responsible for NO decomposition over Cu-loaded ZSM-5
`(ref.22). Nevertheless, the framework topology and Al distribution in ZSM-5
`do not allow to distinguish between the effect of local framework topology
`of the cationic site and its local framework charge density (the number of
`framework aluminum atoms forming the cationic site) on the catalytic ac-
`tivity of the Cu ion. Also, investigation of new systems active in NO de-
`composition, based on Cu-containing MeAlPO-5 and -11 materials23,24, did
`not lead to elucidation of this problem. Detailed investigation of these cata-
`lysts is complicated by a lack of detailed knowledge on cationic sites in
`these molecular sieves and their low thermal stability. Nevertheless, high
`catalytic activity of Cu-MeAlPO matrices indicated that high and stable cat-
`alytic activity in NO decomposition is not restricted only to aluminosilicate
`matrices and one type of framework topology.
`This contribution presents identification of parameters of cationic sites,
`necessary for catalytic activity of Cu ions in NO decomposition. Catalytic
`activity of Cu-loaded molecular sieves of chabazite structure with different
`framework charge density is reported. Only Cu ions located in matrix with
`a low density of the framework negative charge (Zn(Al)PO-34) exhibited an
`activity in NO decomposition while Cu-chabazites (Si/Al = 2.7) were inac-
`tive. Thus, the vicinity of only one framework negative charge is substantial
`for the activity of Cu ion. On the other hand, local topology of the Cu
`cationic site is not a limiting factor for the Cu ion activity, as follows from
`different framework topologies of chabazite and ZSM-5.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`
`Molecular Sieve Preparation
`
`Synthesis of chabazite was performed using the procedure of Gaffney25. Zeolite Y (Si/Al =
`2.7) in the ammonium form was used as a source material after calcination at 550 °C and
`was mixed with a solution of potassium hydroxide. The batch composition was 0.17 Na2O :
`2.0 K2O : Al2O3 : 5.4 SiO2 : 224 H2O. The synthesis took place in a polypropylene bottle
`with a screw-top lid at temperature of 368 K for 96 h without agitation.
`Synthesis of ZnAlPO-34 was performed in the following way. First of phosphoric acid
`(20.17 g) and pseudoboehmite (11.87 g) (Catapal B, Vista) were added to water (50.5 g) and
`stirred for 2 h. Then triethylamine (32.4 g) used as organic template was added and stirred
`for another 2 h. Finally, zinc acetate (1.26 g) in water (7.0 g) was added and the final mix-
`
`Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. (Vol. 65) (2000)
`
`Exhibit 2015.002
`
`

`
`Molecular Sieves of Chabazite Structure
`
`345
`
`ture was thoroughly stirred for another 2 h. The synthesis was carried out in Teflon-lined
`stainless steel autoclaves at 155 °C for 22 h under agitation.
`In both syntheses, the products were recovered by filtration, washed repeatedly with
`deionized water and dried at ambient temperature. The crystallinity and phase purity were
`determined using X-ray powder diffraction. The diffraction pattern of chabazite is depicted
`in Fig. 1a, for ZnAlPO-34 in Fig. 1b.
`Isostructural chabazite and ZnAlPO-34 (structural code CHAB) were equilibrated
`four times with 0.5 M NaCl (20 ml of solution per 1 g of azeolite) for 12 h. After ion ex-
`change, Na-CHAB sieves were washed with distilled water and dried at room tempera-
`ture. Cu2+-CHAB sieves with Cu concentration varying from 0.4 to 12.5 wt.% were
`prepared by ion exchange of Na-CHAB sieves with aqueous solution of Cu acetate. pH of
`Cu acetate–CHAB solutions varied during the ion exchange procedure from 5.1 to 5.6. Sam-
`ples were carefully washed with distilled water, dried at ambient temperature and grained.
`Detailed conditions of the sample preparation and chemical composition of Cu-CHAB sam-
`ples are given in Table I.
`
`Characterization
`
`Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of synthesized molecular sieves were recorded on a
`Siemens D5005 diffractometer in the Bragg–Brentano geometry arrangement, using CuKα ra-
`diation with a graphite monochromator and scintillation counter. To verify that the treat-
`ment of as-synthesized MeAlPO material did not change the crystallinity of the molecular
`sieves, XRD patterns were recorded after synthesis and drying of the sample at room temper-
`ature, after calcination, and after ion exchange.
`
`Catalytic Activity
`
`Catalytic activity of Cu-exchanged molecular sieves was tested in a down-flow glass
`microreactor with inner diameter 5 mm, introducing 4 000 ppm of NO in He, total feed of
`
`3 000
`
`Intensity
`
`2 000
`
`1 000
`
`0
`
`0
`
`a
`
`b
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`2Θ, °
`
`50
`
`FIG. 1
`XRD patterns for chabazite (a), ZnAlPO-34 (b)
`
`Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. (Vol. 65) (2000)
`
`Exhibit 2015.003
`
`

`
`346
`
`Dědeček, Vondrová, Čejka:
`
`100 ml/min, a catalyst weight of 300 mg and in the temperature range 620–750 K. The cata-
`lysts were activated in a He stream (99.996%) with a temperature increase of 5 K/min up to
`680 or 720 K, held for 1 h, and cooled down to the reaction temperature. To achieve the
`temperature of the next measurement, the catalyst was heated in a NO/He stream with a
`temperature increase of 5 K/min. The temperature step between two temperatures of mea-
`surements was 30 K. The NO conversion reached in 30–60 min after stabilization of the
`working temperature was taken as a characteristic value. NO and NO2 were analyzed with an
`accuracy of 0.5% at the inlet and outlet of the reactor with a chemiluminescence analyser
`Vamet 138 (Czech Republic). No NO2 was detected in the products (detection limit 5 ppm).
`Only traces of N2O were observed by mass spectrometry (Hewlett–Packard, 5971A).
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Cu-ZnAlPO-34 molecular sieves activated at 680 K exhibited catalytic activ-
`ity in NO decomposition in the temperature range 620–700 K while
`Cu-ZnAlPOs-34 activated at 720 K exhibited significantly lower activity
`(maximum 50% of the activity of samples activated at 680 K, not shown in
`figures) and Cu-chabazites were inactive. Figure 2a depicts the dependence
`of NO concentration at the reactor outlet on the reaction time-on-stream.
`At first a sharp decrease in NO concentration was observed, followed at
`lower reaction temperature by leveling off to a constant conversion,
`reached within 30 min. This dependence of the NO conversion on
`time-on-stream evidences that the initial behavior of the NO conversion
`over Cu-MeAlPO-34 is similar to the well-known transient behavior of NO
`
`TABLE I
`Chemical composition and conditions of preparation of Cu-CHAB molecular sieves
`
`Molecular
`sieve
`
`Cu/Al
`or
`Cu/Zn
`
`Si/Al
`or
`(Al+P)/Zn
`
`Na/Al
`or
`Na/Zn
`
`Cu concentra-
`tion in solution
`(M)
`
`Solution/
`zeolite, ml/g
`
`Time of
`exchange, h
`
`Cu-CHAB
`
`Cu-CHAB
`
`Cu-CHAB
`
`Cu-CHAB
`
`Cu-ZnAlPO-34
`
`Cu-ZnAlPO-34
`
`0.08
`
`0.15
`
`0.22
`
`0.32
`
`0.13
`
`0.97
`
`Cu-ZnAlPO-34
`
`4.5
`
`2.7
`
`2.7
`
`2.7
`
`2.7
`
`15
`
`15
`
`15
`
`0.84
`
`0.68
`
`0.51
`
`0.26
`
`0.82
`
`<0.05
`
`<0.05
`
`0.005
`
`0.01
`
`0.01
`
`0.01
`
`0.01
`
`0.10
`
`0.10
`
`65
`
`60
`
`110
`
`1
`
`3
`
`12
`
`110 + 110
`
`3 + 15
`
`50
`
`90
`
`16
`
`16
`
`100 + 100
`
`12 + 24
`
`Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. (Vol. 65) (2000)
`
`Exhibit 2015.004
`
`

`
`Molecular Sieves of Chabazite Structure
`
`347
`
`decomposition observed on reduced Cu-ZSM-5 or Cu-MeAlPO-5 and -11
`molecular sieves23,24,26. Thus, the nature of reaction centers in these matri-
`ces is similar. At reaction temperatures lower than 670 K, the catalyst activ-
`ity was stable for hours, as it is documented in Fig. 2b. At reaction
`temperatures higher than 680 K, the catalyst activity significantly decreased
`with time and samples became inactive, as it is shown in Fig. 2a. This deac-
`tivation at higher temperatures was also observed for other Cu-alumino-
`phosphate catalysts (Cu-MeAlPO-5 and -11) and should be associated with
`lower thermal stability of MeAlPO molecular sieves23,24. This suggestion is
`supported by observed lower catalytic activity of samples activated at 720 K
`because the dispersion of Cu ions in molecular sieves is not usually affected
`by the treatment at this temperature18–20.
`In Fig. 3, the temperature dependence of stabilized conversion of NO
`over Cu-ZnAlPO-34 is depicted. The activity increased with temperature,
`but this increase was cut after reaching the temperature of catalyst deactiva-
`tion at 680 K. The maximum values of the stable conversion of NO were
`taken as characteristic values of NO conversion over these catalysts and are
`summarized, together with corresponding turn-over frequency (TOF), in Table II.
`T-O-S, min
`80
`100
`
`4 000
`
`NOppm
`
`3 000
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`2 000
`
`1 000
`4 000
`
`3 000
`
`2 000
`
`FIG. 2
`Dependence of NO concentration at
`the reactor outlet on the reaction
`time-on-stream (T-O-S) (N Cu--chaba-
`zite Cu/Al 0.32, Cu-ZnAlPO-34, Cu/Zn 4.5
`650 K, ❒
`700 K)
`
`Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. (Vol. 65) (2000)
`
`a
`
`b
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`T-O-S, h
`
`5
`
`Exhibit 2015.005
`
`❍
`

`
`348
`
`Dědeček, Vondrová, Čejka:
`
`Cationic sites in chabazite are well known25–32. Cations in site I (for nota-
`tion see refs26–32) are located in the chabazite cavity and coordinated to
`three framework oxygens of the regular six-member ring above the
`six-member ring plane. Site II of the chabazite cavity is occupied only in
`partially hydrated chabazites. Site III is inside the hexagonal prism. Ions at
`this site can hardly play the role of catalytic center as their coordination
`sphere is fully occupied. Site IV corresponds to the cations located in the
`eight-member ring connecting chabazite cavities. Cu+ ions in dehydrated
`form occupy only sites I and IV (ref.33) and only these sites are shown in
`
`TABLE II
`Catalytic activity of Cu-CHAB molecular sieves
`
`Catalyst
`
`Cu, wt%
`
`Cu/Al or Cu/Zn
`
`Conversion, %
`
`TOF ⋅ 10–4, s–1
`
`Cu-ZnAlPO-34
`
`Cu-ZnAlPO-34
`
`Cu-ZnAlPO-34
`
`Cu-CHAB
`
`Cu-CHAB
`
`Cu-CHAB
`
`Cu-CHAB
`
`12.5
`
`2.4
`
`0.4
`
`7.6
`
`5.2
`
`3.6
`
`1.9
`
`4.5
`
`0.97
`
`0.13
`
`0.32
`
`0.22
`
`0.15
`
`0.08
`
`14.2
`
`6.5
`
`2.4
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0.9
`
`2.0
`
`4.5
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`630
`
`660
`
`690
`
`720
`
`750
`
`T, K
`
`780
`
`FIG. 3
`Temperature dependence of NO de-
`composition over Cu-ZnAlPO-34 cata-
`lyst (Cu/Zn 4.5, 0.30 g of catalyst)
`
`Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. (Vol. 65) (2000)
`
`16
`
`NO,%
`
`12
`
`8
`
`4
`
`0
`
`Exhibit 2015.006
`
`

`
`Molecular Sieves of Chabazite Structure
`
`349
`
`Fig. 4. MeAlPO-34 is isostructural with chabazite structure34 and the local
`topology of the cationic sites of Cu-ZnAlPO-34 structure is identical. Thus,
`Cu species active in NO decomposition in Zn-AlPO-34 are coordinated to
`the regular six-member or eight-member rings. However, these types of
`rings are not present in the ZSM-5 or MeAlPO-5 and -11 structures, in
`which ions are assumed to be coordinated to various deformed six-member
`rings22,24,35. This indicates that the local topology of cationic site is not a
`crucial parameter controlling the catalytic activity of Cu ions in NO decom-
`position.
`The only possible difference in Cu siting between chabazite and
`ZnAlPO-34 has to be associated with the change in the framework negative
`charge density, reflected in the Si/Al ratio of chabazite and the (Al + P)/Zn
`ratio of ZnAlPO-34. In the case of chabazite with Si/Al ≈ 2.7, at least 93% of
`cationic sites contain two aluminum atoms, as follows from simple statistic
`calculation. This assumption is supported by full ion exchange of divalent
`in chabazite (Me2+/Al
`ions
`ratio 0.5) observed for Co-, Mn- and
`Ca-chabazites26–32. On the other hand, in the case of ZnAlPO-34 with a sig-
`nificantly lower density of framework negative charge ((Al + P)/Zn = 15),
`the probability of the presence of two framework aluminum atoms at
`cationic sites formed by six- or eight-member rings is significantly lower.
`Thus, we can suppose that sites containing only one Al atom are negligible
`in chabazite and, in contrast, they prevail in ZnAlPO-34. The low density of
`the framework negative charge can also affect the relative number of
`cationic sites formed by six- or eight-member rings. In the chabazite frame-
`work, all rings contain aluminum atoms forming cationic sites and the ra-
`
`FIG. 4
`Cu sites occupied in ion-exchanged dehydrated chabazite and their notation according to
`refs26–32
`
`Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. (Vol. 65) (2000)
`
`Exhibit 2015.007
`
`

`
`350
`
`Dědeček, Vondrová, Čejka:
`
`tio of sites formed by six- and eight-member rings is given by their
`frequency in the framework. In ZnAlPO-34 with low density of negative
`charge, rings without Al atom can be present. In this case, the ratio of sites
`formed by six- and eight-member rings is given by the Al distribution in the
`framework.
`Because all Cu-chabazites contain Cu ions located both in six- and
`eight-member rings, as reported in our previous study33, the inactivity of
`Cu-chabazites in NO decomposition is caused by the presence of two frame-
`work aluminum atoms in every cationic site of the matrix. The difference
`in the turn-over frequency values in NO decomposition by Cu-ZnAlPO-34
`samples with different Cu loading can be explained by the difference in the
`occupation of sites with different catalytic activity or by formation of
`CuxOy species in highly loaded Cu-ZnAlPO-34. The presence of these spe-
`cies is reflected in high Cu exchange level (Cu/Al = 1.4); these species do
`not exhibit catalytic activity36.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`Cu ions exchanged to ZnAlPO-34 molecular sieves exhibit high and stable
`catalytic activity in NO decomposition, while Cu ions exchanged to chaba-
`zite are inactive.
`The density of the framework negative charge has been found to be the
`crucial parameter controlling the activity in NO decomposition of Cu ions
`located in molecular sieves. Cu ions balanced by two framework negative
`charges (two framework aluminum atoms) are inactive; however, Cu ions
`balanced by a single framework negative charge exhibit catalytic activity.
`Catalytic activity of Cu ions is not restricted to only one type of local to-
`pology of the cationic site. Both Cu ions located in regular six-member or
`eight-member rings (CHAB structure) and in elongated or deformed
`six-member rings (ZSM-5, MeAlPO-5 and -11) exhibit catalytic activity in
`NO decomposition.
`
`This work was supported by VW Stiftung project No. I/72937. The authors thank Dr T. Grygar for
`chemical analysis of zeolites.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Iwamoto M., Yokoo S., Sakai K., Kagawa S.: J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1981, 77, 1692.
`2. Iwamoto M., Yahiro H., Tanda K., Mizuno N., Mine Y.: J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 3727.
`3. Iwamoto M.: Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1994, 84, 1395.
`
`Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. (Vol. 65) (2000)
`
`Exhibit 2015.008
`
`

`
`Molecular Sieves of Chabazite Structure
`
`351
`
`4. Li Y., Hall W. K.: J. Catal. 1991, 129, 202.
`5.IwamotoM.,YahiroH.:Catal.Today1994,22,5.
`6.CentiG.,PeranthonerS.:Appl.Catal.,A1995,132,179.
`7. Liu D.-J., Robota H. J.: Catal. Lett. 1993, 21, 291.
`8.SchneiderW.F.,HaasK.C.,RamprasadR.,AdamsJ.B.:J.Phys.Chem.1996,100,6032.
`9.HaasK.C.,SchneiderW.F.:J.Phys.Chem.1996,100,9292.
`J.Phys.Chem.B1997,101,1940.
`10.RamprasadR.,SchneiderW.F.,HaasK.C.,AdamsJ.B.:
`11.YokomichiY.,YamabeT.,OtsukaH.,KakumotoT.:J.Phys.Chem.1996,100,14424.
`12.BlintR.J.:J.Phys.Chem.1996,100,19518.
`13.TroutB.L.,ChakrabortyA.K.,BellA.T.:J.Phys.Chem.1996,100,4173.
`14.TroutB.L.,ChakrabortyA.K.,BellA.T.:J.Phys.Chem.1996,100,17582.
`15.SpotoG.,ZecchinaA.,BordigaS.,RicchiardiG.,MartraG.,LeofantiG.,PetriniG.:Appl.
`Catal.,B1994,3,151.
`16. Anpo M., Matsuoka M., Shioya Y., Yamashita H., Giamello E., Morterra C., Che M.,
`Patterson H. H., Weber S., Oullette S., Fox M. A.: J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 5744.
`17. Teraishi K., Ishida M., Irisawa J., Kume M., Takahashi Y., Nakano T., Nakamura H.,
`MiyamotoA.:J.Phys.Chem.B1997,101,8079.
`18. Wichterlová B., Dědeček J., Vondrová A.: J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 1065.
`19. Dědeček J., Sobalík Z., Tvarůžková Z., Kaucký D., Wichterlová B.: J. Phys. Chem. 1995,
`99, 16327.
`20.WichterlováB.,DědečekJ.,SobalíkZ.,VondrováA.,KlierK.:J.Catal.1997,169,194.
`21.DědečekJ.,WichterlováB.:J.Phys.Chem.B1997,101,10233.
`22. Dědeček J., Wichterlová B.: Chem. Phys. Phys. Chem. 1999, 1, 629.
`23.DědečekJ.,ČejkaJ.,WichterlováB.:Appl.Catal.,B1998,15,233.
`24.DědečekJ.,VondrováA.,ČejkaJ.:Collect.Czech.Chem.Commun.1998,63,1755.
`25. Gaffney T. R.: Micropor. Mater. 1998, 22, 551.
`26. Dědeček J., Wichterlová B.: Unpublished results.
`27.PluthJ.J.,SmithJ.V.,MortierW.J.:Mater.Res.Bull.1977,12,1001.
`28. Calligaris M., Nardin G., Randaccio L.: Zeolites 1984, 4, 251.
`29.MortierW.J.,PluthJ.J.,SmithJ.V.:Mater.Res.Bull.1977,12,103.
`30. Calligaris M., Mezzetti A., Nardin G., Randaccio L.: Zeolites 1986, 6, 137.
`31. Calligaris M., Mezzetti A., Nardin G., Randaccio L.: Zeolites 1984, 4, 323.
`32. Calligaris M., Mezzetti A., Nardin G., Randaccio L.: Zeolites 1985, 5, 317.
`33.DědečekJ.,WichterlováB.,KubátP.:Micropor.Mesopor.Mater.1999,32,63.
`34. Lok B. M., Messina C. A., Patton R. L., Gajek R. T., Cannan T. R., Flanigen E. M.: J. Am.
`Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6092.
`35. Dědeček J., Kaucký D., Wichterlová B.: Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., in press.
`36. Dědeček J., Bortnovski O., Vondrová A., Wichterlová B.: Appl. Catal., B, submitted.
`
`Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. (Vol. 65) (2000)
`
`Exhibit 2015.009

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket