throbber
EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF STANLEY ROTH, PH.D. UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.132
`
`Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
`
`journal of Catalysis
`
`journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jcat
`
`Priority Communication
`Excellent activity and selectivity of Cu-SSZ-13 in the selective catalytic reduction
`of NOx with NH3
`]a Hun Kwak, Russell G. Tonkyn, Do Heui Kim, Janos Szanyi, Charles H.F. Peden*
`
`Institute for Interfacial Catalysis, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, United States
`
`ARTICLE INFO
`
`A B S T R A C T
`
`Superior activity and selectivity of a Cu ion-exchanged SSZ-13 zeolite in the selective catalytic reduction
`(SCR) of NOx with NH 3 were observed, in comparison with Cu-beta and Cu-ZSM-5 zeolites. Cu-SSZ-13 was
`not only more active in the NOx SCR reaction over the entire temperature range studied (up to 550 °C),
`but also more selective toward nitrogen formation, resulting in significantly lower amounts of NOx by(cid:173)
`products (i.e., N02 and N20) than the other two zeolites. In addition, Cu-SSZ-13 demonstrated the highest
`activity and N2 formation selectivity in the oxidation of NH 3 . The results of this study strongly suggest
`that Cu-SSZ-13 is a promising candidate as a catalyst for NOx SCR with great potential in after-treatment
`systems for either mobile or stationary sources.
`
`© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
`
`Article history:
`Received 15 June 2010
`Revised 30 July 2010
`Accepted 30 July 2010
`Available online 15 September 2010
`
`Keywords:
`Cu-SSZ-13
`Zeolites
`Ammonia SCR
`N2 selectivity
`
`1. Introduction
`
`The abatement of environmentally harmful NOx compounds
`(NO, N0 2 , and N2 0) emitted from mobile or stationary power
`sources remains a challenging task for the catalysis community.
`In particular, conventional three-way catalysts used in the exhaust
`after treatment technologies of internal combustion engines prove
`ineffective when the engine is operated under highly oxidizing
`conditions (to achieve better fuel efficiency). The problem is daunt(cid:173)
`ing, since reduction chemistry (NOx to N2 ) has to be carried out un(cid:173)
`der highly oxidizing conditions. Several approaches have been
`proposed for lean-NOx abatement, each of them with its own spe(cid:173)
`cific sets of problems. The two technologies that seem to have clear
`advantages among the processes proposed are the selective cata(cid:173)
`lytic reduction either with hydrocarbons (HC-SCR) or with ammo(cid:173)
`nia (NHrSCR), and lean-NOx traps (LNT). For the NHrSCR
`technology, transition metal (in particular Fe and Cu) ion-ex(cid:173)
`changed zeolite catalysts have shown high activity and N2
`selectivity.
`The most extensive studies have been carried out on Cu2+ ion(cid:173)
`exchanged ZSM-5 (Cu-ZSM-5) zeolites, first shown to exhibit high
`NO decomposition rates and NOx SCR activities in the 1980s i .l --7].
`More recently, Cu2
`+ -exchanged beta zeolite (Cu-beta) has been
`shown to have excellent activity in the SCR of NOx with NH 3 , and
`metal-exchanged beta zeolites are generally found to have greater
`hydrothermal stability than similar ZSM-5 catalysts [8]. In the very
`recent patent literature, Cu2 + ion-exchanged SSZ-13 ( Cu-SSZ-13)
`
`* Corresponding author_ Fax: + 1 509 3 76 283 7.
`E-mail address: chuckpeden@pnLgov (CH_f_ Peden).
`
`0021-9517 /$ - see front matter© 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
`doi:10.101 G/j .jcdt.2010.07.031
`
`has been reported to exhibit NOx conversions of 90-100% over a
`wide temperature range in the NHrSCR process, and its activity
`exceeded 80% even after extensive high-temperature hydrother(cid:173)
`mal aging [9]. The SSZ-13 zeolite has chabazite (CHA) structure
`with a relatively small pore radius (~3.8 A) in an eight-membered
`ring [10]. The enhanced thermal stability of the Cu-SSZ-13 catalyst
`has been attributed to the location of copper ions within the cage;
`i.e., just outside the six-membered rings of the zeolite framework,
`as evidenced by XRD analysis I 11 ]. Although, high catalytic activity
`has been reported in the patent literature for the Cu-SSZ-13 cata(cid:173)
`lyst under a specific set of reaction conditions, no comparisons
`have been made with other, widely studied NHrSCR catalysts
`(i.e., Cu-ZSM-5 and Cu-beta) under the same reaction conditions.
`Here, we report on the performance of a Cu-SSZ-13 catalyst in
`the SCR of NOx with NH3 , particularly focusing on the activity
`and N2 selectivity in comparison with those of Cu-beta and Cu(cid:173)
`ZSM-5. We also compare the NH 3 oxidation activities/selectivities
`of these catalysts under highly oxidizing conditions. Our results
`confirm that the activity and selectivity of the Cu-SSZ-13 catalyst
`for both NOx SCR with NH 3 and NH3 oxidation are superior to those
`of both Cu-beta and Cu-ZSM-5.
`
`2. Experimental
`
`The SSZ-13 zeolite was synthesized using the methods recently
`published by Fickel and Lobo [11 I. reported to give a material with
`a Si/Al2 ratio of~ 12. The structure-directing agent used in the syn(cid:173)
`thesis, N,N,N-trimethyl-1-adamantanamine iodide, was synthe(cid:173)
`sized using the procedure reported by Zones [ 10]. After synthesis,
`
`Exhibit 2014.001
`
`

`
`188
`
`j.H. Kwak et al./joumal of Catalysis 275 (2010) 187-190
`
`EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF STANLEY ROTH, PH.D. UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.132
`
`the SSZ-13 was calcined at 550 °C for 5 h in air before ion exchange
`in order to remove the zeolite framework structure-directing
`agent. Copper ions were exchanged into the zeolite in an aqueous
`ion-exchange process, using 0.1 M Cu(N03 )2 solutions; solution
`volumes were such that they contained twice the amount of Cu2+
`needed for complete ion exchange. After ion exchange over 1 day
`at room temperature, the catalysts were filtered, thoroughly
`washed with distilled water, and dried overnight at 100 °C. To
`ensure complete ion exchange, this process was carried out a sec(cid:173)
`ond time with an aqueous solution of Cu2+ of the same initial con(cid:173)
`centration. The dried catalysts were pre-calcined at 500 °C in
`laboratory air for 2 h before reaction tests. The CHA structure in
`Cu-SSZ-13 was confirmed with XRD measurement.
`For comparison purposes, Cu2+-exchanged ZSM-5 and beta zeo(cid:173)
`lites were prepared from commercially available zeolites (ZSM-5
`(CBV-3024, Si/Ah= 30) and beta (CP-814(, Si/Ah= 38), both from
`Zeolyst International Co.), using the same ion-exchange and calci(cid:173)
`nation procedures applied to the preparation of the Cu-SSZ-13
`sample, except for varying the Cu2+ concentration of the solution
`to match the Si/Al2 ratios of the particular zeolite.
`The NOx SCR activities were measured in a flow-through pow(cid:173)
`der reactor system using gas mixtures containing 350 ppm NO,
`350 ppm NH3 , 14% 0 2, and 2% H20 with a balance of N2. The total
`flow rate was held at 300 seem over the 120-130 mg catalyst pow(cid:173)
`
`der samples (SV ~ 30,000 h- 1 ). The temperature was varied from
`550 to 160 °C in approximately 50 °C steps, as measured by a small
`type K thermocouple inserted directly into the center of the cata(cid:173)
`lyst powder bed. The NH 3 oxidation reaction was carried out under
`similar reaction conditions in the absence of NO in the gas mixture.
`The reactant and product gas mixtures (NO, N02, N20, and NH3 )
`were analyzed using FTIR spectroscopy (Nicolet Magma 760 with
`OMNIC Series software) in a heated, 2-m path-length gas cell.
`Our reported NOx conversions (%) are defined as {NOiniet - (NO+
`N02 + 2 * NzO)outlet/NOinietl * 100.
`
`3. Results and discussion
`
`NOx conversions as a function of reaction temperatures be(cid:173)
`tween 150 and 550 °C are shown in fig. 1 over the three Cu-zeo(cid:173)
`lites studied. Both Cu-ZSM-5 and Cu-SSZ-13 catalysts exhibit
`maximum conversion (>95%) at temperatures somewhat above
`
`80
`
`~
`5 60
`'iii
`~
`8 40
`~ z
`
`250 °C, while the maximum conversion over Cu-beta in the same
`temperature range is slightly lower (90%). Note that the Cu-SSZ-
`13 catalyst maintains its high conversion (>90%) up to 500 °C,
`while the NOx conversion of Cu-ZSM-5 begins to decline above
`300 °C. Even at 550 °C, the highest temperature of this study, Cu(cid:173)
`SSZ-13 exhibits a respectably high conversion of 83%. The order
`of activity of these catalysts in the high-temperature region
`(350-550 °C) is as follows: Cu-SSZ-13 > Cu-ZSM-5 >Cu-beta.
`In addition to NOx conversion, significant differences in product
`selectivity were observed for the three zeolite catalysts studied.
`Fig. 2 displays the amounts of by-products N02 (a) and N20 (b)
`formed in the SCR reaction. At reaction temperatures above
`300 °C, Cu-ZSM-5 and Cu-beta produce significant amounts of
`N02, and at 500 °C the amounts of N02 produced over these two
`catalysts are 30 and 25 ppm, respectively, much higher than the
`<10 ppm measured over the Cu-SSZ-13. N20 formation profiles as
`a function of reaction temperature, shown in Fig. 2b, also exhibit
`large differences among the three Cu ion-exchanged zeolite cata(cid:173)
`lysts. The N20 level over the Cu-SSZ-13 is very low ( <5 ppm) over
`the entire temperature range studied, while the Cu-beta catalyst
`shows a double maxima in N20 concentrations at low and high
`
`a 4o-r-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
`Cu-Z5M-5 ~
`()
`i~s.s--,b~·~a
`Z\~ ... ~$:~ .. ,l~~ t:J
`
`'E 30
`D. .e
`c
`0
`-~ 20
`E ...
`.2
`0 z 10
`
`600
`
`500
`400
`300
`200
`Reaction temperature (0 C)
`b 40~----------~
`Cu-Z5M-5 ~
`~).~---b~t:..~ ()
`{;_~.,ss.s.-:-· 1~~ L:1
`
`30
`
`-
`E
`D. .e
`c
`0 -:g 20
`E ...
`.2
`q.
`z 10
`
`20
`
`8 Cu-ZSM-5
`t:~~ .. ·b~3ta
`•"'>
`\.,.}
`f""~
`~).~ .. §~~~ ,.. '3_~$
`~ ..... ,,,,.,:.
`O+-~.-----.-~""T""~-r---,~---.-~-.-~,----.~-1
`200
`300
`400
`500
`600
`100
`Reaction temperature (°C)
`
`Fig. 1. NOx conversion profiles for Cu-SSZ-13 (squares), Cu-beta (circles), and Cu(cid:173)
`ZSM-5 (triangles) at various temperatures in a gas mixture containing 350 ppm NO,
`350 ppm NH3 , 14% o,. and 2% H20 with a balance of N2•
`
`O+---,.--~~~~.-----.-~-.-~.-----.-~-r---t
`400
`100
`300
`200
`500
`600
`Reaction temperature {°C)
`
`Fig. 2. N0 2 (a) and N20 (b) formation profiles during NH3 SCR on Cu-SSZ-13
`(squares), Cu-beta (circles), and Cu-ZSM-5 (triangles) at various temperatures in a
`gas mixture containing 350 ppm NO, 350 ppm NH3 , 14% o,. and 2% H20 with a
`balance of N2.
`
`Exhibit 2014.002
`
`

`
`EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF STANLEY ROTH, PH.D. UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.132
`
`j.H. Kwak et al./joumal of Catalysis 275 (2010) 187-190
`
`189
`
`a 100
`
`80
`
`~
`'iii .. cu
`c 60
`0
`> c
`0 40
`u ...
`::c z
`
`zo
`
`fl. Cu-ZSM-5
`
`0
`100
`
`600
`
`400
`200
`500
`300
`Reaction temperature (0 C)
`b 60,....-~~~~~~~~~~~~--,
`Cu-ZSM-5 fl.
`E' 1:1.
`..!?; 50
`c
`0
`~ 40
`
`E .. .E
`
`0 30
`
`
`O{
`
`20
`
`~
`~ 10
`0 z
`
`O+---,~~Vi-..r-~~~~~~~~~~---1
`100
`200
`300
`400
`500
`600
`Reaction temperature (°C)
`
`Fig. 3. (a) NH3 conversion profiles and (b) NOx product distributions during the NH3
`oxidation reaction on Cu-SSZ-13 (squares), Cu-beta (circles), and Cu-ZSM-5
`(triangles) at various temperatures in a gas mixture containing 350 ppm NH3 ,
`14% 0 2 , and 2% H20 with a balance of N2.
`
`4. Conclusions
`
`Under the same reaction conditions for NOx SCR with NH 3 ,
`formation
`Cu-SSZ-13 demonstrates superior activity and N2
`selectivity in comparison with Cu-beta and Cu-ZSM-5 zeolites.
`We find that Cu-SSZ-13 is more active for N Ox conversion over
`the entire temperature range studied (160-550 °C). Moreover,
`the Cu-SSZ-13 is also more selective toward the formation of
`N2 , producing lower amounts of undesired by-products such
`as N0 2 and N20. Our results also demonstrate that Cu-SSZ-13
`has superior performance for NH 3 oxidation (lower light-off
`temperature) than Cu-beta and Cu-ZSM-5 zeolites, while also
`producing significantly lower amounts of (over-oxidized) NOx
`species. These results suggest that Cu-SSZ-13 is an excellent
`candidate catalyst for use in practical NH 3 SCR of NOx and/or
`NH3 oxidation applications (the after-treatment systems of var(cid:173)
`ious mobile or stationary sources). Detailed mechanistic studies
`are currently under way in our laboratory to understand the
`origin of the different activities and selectivities observed for
`these three catalysts in both the NOx SCR and NH 3 oxidation
`reactions.
`
`temperatures; i.e., 27 ppm at 200 °C and 24 ppm at 450 °C, respec(cid:173)
`tively. The Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst produced a similar N20 formation
`profile to Cu-beta, but the amounts of N20 formed were much
`smaller. These N2 0 formation profiles are likely related to the reac(cid:173)
`tion mechanisms of the NOx reduction reactions. For example, our
`results demonstrate that reaction intermediates (e.g., NOx-NH3 ad(cid:173)
`sorbed complexes) on Cu-SSZ-13 take a more selective reaction
`route toward the production of N2 than do the complexes on the
`Cu-beta and Cu-ZSM-5 catalysts.
`The differences in activity and selectivity of the three zeolites
`studied may be related to fundamental differences in the known
`structures of these zeolites, i.e., the pore sizes and locations of
`the copper ions. The order of high-temperature NH 3 SCR reactivity
`discussed earlier is the inverse of the order in pore size, i.e., SSZ-13
`having the smallest pores ( ~4 A, 8-membered ring) being the most
`active, ZSM-5 with medium size pore opening (~5.5 A, 10-mem(cid:173)
`bered ring) having medium activity, and beta with the largest
`pores (~7 A and ~s.s A, 12-membered ring) having the lowest
`activity and N2 selectivity. For these three catalysts, the smaller
`size pores seem to be preferred for the desirable reaction path(cid:173)
`ways; however, detailed mechanistic studies need to be conducted
`to substantiate the correlation between pore size and activity/
`selectivity. In summary, both the activity and selectivity of NOx
`SCR with NH 3 for Cu-SSZ-13 are superior to those of Cu-ZSM-5
`and Cu-beta over the entire temperature range studied (up to
`550 °C).
`The differences observed in the ammonia SCR reactivities and
`N2 formation selectivities for the three catalysts studied may also
`be related (at least in part) to their abilities to oxidize ammonia.
`Therefore, we performed NH 3 oxidation reactions over the three
`different Cu-zeolite catalysts in the absence of NO and the results
`are presented in Fig. 3. Ammonia conversions (Fig. 3a) reveal that
`the light-off temperature for NH3 oxidation is the lowest for Cu(cid:173)
`SSZ-13, indicating its superior intrinsic NH3 oxidation ability. For
`this catalyst, the NH3 oxidation reaction lights off at around
`200 °C and reaches a conversion level of more than 90% at
`~300 °C. The NH 3 conversion profiles for Cu-beta and Cu-ZSM-5
`are shifted to higher temperatures by ~so and ~ 100 °C, respec(cid:173)
`tively, relative to that of Cu-SSZ-13.
`The concentrations of NOx (NO+ N02 + N2 0) in the reaction
`effluent, which are regarded as by-products during NH3 oxida(cid:173)
`tion to N2 , are plotted in Fig. 3b. The Cu-beta catalyst produced
`relatively higher levels of these by-products, with a maximum of
`about 55 ppm at 350 °C, while the Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst produced
`significant amounts of by-products at 550 °C. The relative lack
`of NOx formation during ammonia oxidation on the Cu-SSZ-13
`catalyst implies that most of the NH3 is converted to N2 over
`a wide temperature range for this catalyst. The near absence
`of further oxidization to N20, NO, or N0 2 , as was the case for
`the Cu-beta and Cu-ZSM-5 catalysts, suggests again that the
`environment within the Cu-SSZ-13 catalyst may provide opti(cid:173)
`mum conditions for selective conversion of reaction intermedi(cid:173)
`ates to Nz.
`According to the results of previous studies, noble metal cata(cid:173)
`lysts, including Pt [12], have been found to be very active in
`ammonia oxidation, but rather non-selective to N2 formation,
`while transition metal oxides such as Mn02 and CuO 113] have
`higher N2 selectivity, but require significantly higher tempera(cid:173)
`tures. Cu-SSZ-13, on the other hand, can meet the two important
`requirements: excellent NH3 oxidation activity and N2 selectivity
`over a wide temperature range. Thus, for example, the use of Cu(cid:173)
`SSZ-13 as an NH 3 oxidation catalyst at the downstream end of a
`NOx SCR with NH3 unit might provide flexibility for controlling
`the dose of urea introduced before the SCR catalyst, since any ex(cid:173)
`cess of NH 3 can perhaps be removed more easily over the catalyst
`bed.
`
`Exhibit 2014.003
`
`

`
`EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF STANLEY ROTH, PH.D. UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.132
`
`190
`
`j.H. Kwak et al./joumal of Catalysis 275 (2010) 187-190
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`Financial support was provided by the US Department of Energy
`(DOE), Office of FreedomCar and Vehicle Technologies. Portions of
`this work were performed in the Environmental Molecular
`Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) at Pacific Northwest National Labora(cid:173)
`tory (PNNL). The EMSL is a national scientific user facility and sup(cid:173)
`ported by the US DOE, Office of Biological and Environmental
`Research. PNNL is a multi-program national laboratory operated
`for the US Department of Energy by Batte lie Memorial Institute un(cid:173)
`der Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830.
`
`References
`
`[1] M. Iwamoto, H. Furukawa, Y. Mine, F. Uemura, S. Mikuriya, S. Kagawa, j. Chem.
`Soc. Chem. Commun. (1986) 1272.
`
`[2] M. Iwamoto, H. Yahiro, Y. Torikai, T. Yoshioka, N. Mizuno, Chem. Lett. 19 (1990)
`1967.
`[3] j.Y. Yan, G.D. Lei, W.M.H. Sachtler, H.H. Kung, J. Cata!. 161 (1996) 43.
`[4] R.Q. Long, R.T. Yang, j. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999) 5595.
`[5] A. Grossale, I. Nova, E. Tronconi, D. Chatterjee, M. Weibel, j. Cata!. 256 (2008)
`312.
`[6] K. Rahkamaa-Tolonen, T. Maunula, M. Lomma, M. Huuhtanen, R.L. Keiski, Cata!.
`Today 100 (2005) 217.
`[7] T. Komatsu, M. Nunokawa, LS. Moon, T. Takahara, S. Namba, T. Yashima, j.
`Cata!. 148 (1994) 427.
`[8] S. Brandenberger, 0. Krocher, A. Tissler, R. Althoff, Cata!. Rev. - Sci. Eng. 50
`(2008) 492.
`[9] I. Bull, W.-M. Xue, P. Burk, R.S. Boorse, W.M. jaglowski, G.S. Koermer, A. Moini,
`j.A. Patchett, J.C. Dettling, M.T. Caudle, US Patent 7,610,662, 2009.
`[10] S.I. Zones, US Patent 4,544,538, 1985.
`[11] D.W. Fickel, R.F. Lobo,]. Phys. Chem. C 114(2010)1633.
`[12] j.J. Ostermaier, j.R. Katzer, W.H. Manogue, j. Cata!. 41 (1976) 277.
`[13] A. Wollner, F. Lange, H. Schmelz, H. Knozinger, Appl. Cata!. A 94 (1993)
`181.
`
`Exhibit 2014.004

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket