throbber
Inter Partes Reexamination No. 95/001 ,453
`Declaration of A.hmad Moini, Ph,D,
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Examiner: DIAMOND, ALAN D
`
`Group Art lfnjt: 3991
`
`Confinnation No: 2755
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`In Inter Partes Reexa1nination of:
`
`BULLET AL.
`
`Reexamination Control No. 95/001,453
`
`PatentNo, 7,601,662
`
`Issued: October 13, 2009
`
`For: COPPER CHA
`ZEOLITE CATALYSTS
`Mail Stop Inter Partes Reexa:m
`Central Reexamination Unit
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`DECLARATION OF AHMAD MOINI. PH.D.~ UNDER 37 C.KR. § 1.132
`
`1, Ahmad Moini, do declare and say as follows:
`
`1. I am a Senior Research Associate for BASF Corporation, the successor in interest to
`Engelhard Corporation and BASF Catalysts LLC (BASF), the mvner of United States patent number
`7,601,662 (11the '662 patent'} I received a RS. in Chemistry from Eastern Washington University in
`1982 and a Ph.D. in Chemistry from Texas A&M University in 1986. I have been a scientist at
`BASF Corporation. I am a co-inventor of the subject matter described and claimed in the 1662
`patent
`
`l have been involved in heterogeneous catalyst research fi.1r rnore than 20 years. first as a
`2,
`researcher at Mobjl Research and Development Corporation, and later at BASF Corporation. I am a
`nmned inventor on 30 granted United States patents, some of which pertain to zeolites for use as
`automotive catalysts.
`
`3. As part of the research team that discovered the copper chabazite catalysts of the '662 patent,
`we were tasked with the challenge to provide a material for selective catal)iic reduction that would
`have tv,ro main properties: (1) excellent NOx conversion over a 1.:vide ten1perature range, including
`the low temperature range of 200° C to 350° C; and (2) hydrothennal stability-meaning that the
`NOx conversion would not degrade significantly upon hydrothermal ag1ng at temperatm·es in excess
`of 650° C. Befr)re begjnning research, I initially believed that a metal promoted zeolite v.rou1d not
`have both of these properties. Prior to the invention of the subject matter of the '662 patent, it was
`believed that Fe zeolites had better hydxothermal stability than Cu zeolites.
`
`4. Our initial studies included a sn1al1 scale rapid screening test that we d(wdoped and used to
`initially scre~~n over 900 zeolite materials indud1ng over twelve different structure types, different
`
`Exhibit 2003.001
`
`

`
`Inter Partes Reexamination No, 95/001 ,453
`Declaration of Ahrnad Moini, Ph.D.
`
`silica to alumina ratios, different meta! ions, and different metal ion/aluminum ratios. After initial
`studies were completed, selected samples were screened further on the basis ofNOx conversion, low
`degradation ofNOx conversion after hydrothermal aging at 800° C in l 0% H20, and low generation
`ofN20. The materials claimed in the t662 patent emerged as the lead rnaterial, and we fi.mnd that
`zeo1Hes having the CH.A structure type and a sifa~a to aJumina ratio greater than 15 and \'.~opper to
`aluminum ratios exceeding 0.25 mei. the requirements stated above. I believe the properties of these
`materials were highly unexpected.
`
`5. It is my understanding that the invention is not limited to zeolites containing free or non(cid:173)
`exchanged copper. Examples l, lA, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 16, 17 and 18 all show the unexpected results
`achieved by zeolites that have the CHA structure type and silica to alumina ratio greater than 15 and
`copper to aluminum ratio exceeding 0.25. The properties of the exarnples tested were quite
`unexpected in that the literature had reported that Cu zeolites exhibited poor hydrothermal stability.
`Then.~ had been a longstanding need for a metal promoted zeolite that exhibited both low
`temperature conversion in the range of 200° to 350° C and hydrothermal stability. The Examples in
`the '662 patent include various copper loadings, variations in ion exchange techniques (e.g.,
`concentration of exchange solution, temperature, time, munher of exchanges, exchange
`prior/during/after fonnation/appHcation of slurry, etc). A person of ordinary skill in the art wiU
`readily understand that these variations vv1.11 affect NOx conversion. Aside from th(~se variations in
`preparation, the Examples shmv that when additional steps were taken beyond a traditional ion
`excfo.=mge, enhanced NOx conversion was obtained. Cornparing Examples 1A and I, it is believed
`that the level of NOx conversion for Example IA \Vas higher than Example I for the aged samples;
`because Example IA included the addition of copper to the coating slurry after traditional ion
`~~xchange to provide additional copper. Example 3, which involved. traditional ion exchange plus
`impregnation also showed enhanced NOx conversion performance for aged samples compared to
`other aged samples.
`
`6. Example 18 shows the effoc:t of using different ion exchange conditions (e.g., copper acetate
`versus copper sulfate) on the perforrmmce of the catalyst. ln Example 18, a relatively high
`concentration of copper acetate was used and the ion exchange \Vas conducted at 70'' C for one hour.
`Example 18 is a unique preparation.
`
`7. A person of ordinary skill in the rut could determine the presence of free or non--exchanged
`copper in each Example of the '662 patent from available techniques such as X-ra.Y Ahsmvfam Near(cid:173)
`Edgc Structure spectroscopy.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my ow11 kno>vvledge are tme and that an
`statements made herein on information and belief are believed to be true; and further that these
`statements were made with the knowledge that wlllful false statements and the like so made are
`punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States
`Code, and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the above-identified
`patent
`
`Dated: February 9, 2011
`
`RespecHhlly submitted,
`/t ,/'0?7
`,,.,.,, /
`/
`// ,,,., (~~:? 1
`./·/(/·/A rY1,.,-1.:'h,._u.'.\,.~···{
`Ahrnad Moini, Ph.D.
`
`By:
`
`>
`
`i;......,..,,.
`
`2
`
`Exhibit 2003.002

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket