throbber
EXHIBITS TO DECLARATJONOF STANLEY ROTH, PH.D. UNDER 37 C.F.R. § U32
`
`Enhanced Durability of a Cu/Zeolite Based SCR Catalyst
`
`Giovanni Cavataio~ Hung-Wen Jen, James R Warner, James W. Girard,
`Jeong Y. Kim and Christine K. Lambert
`Ford Motor Company
`
`Copyright© 2008 SAE International
`
`2008-01-1025
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Passenger and light duty diesel vehicles will require up to
`90°/o NOx conversion over the Federal Test Procedure
`(FTP) to meet future Tier 2 Bin 5 standards. This
`accomplishment is especially challenging for low exhaust
`temperature applications that mostly operate in the 200 -
`350°C temperature regime. Selective catalytic reduction
`(SCR) catalysts formulated with Cu/zeolites have shown
`the potential to deliver this level of performance fresh,
`but their periormance can easily deteriorate over time as
`a result of higt1 temperature thermal deactivation. These
`high
`temperature SCR deactivation modes are
`unavoidable due to
`the requirements necessary to
`actively regenerate diesel particulate fiiters and purge
`SCRs
`irom sulfur and hydrocarbon contamination.
`Careful vehicle temperature control of these events is
`necessary to prevent unintentional thermal damage but
`not always possible. As a result, there is a need to
`develop thermally robust SCR catalysts.
`Fe/zeolite
`formulations are known to exhibit superior hydrothermal
`stability over Cu/zeolite formulations. However, current
`Fe/zeolite forrnulations are not very active for NOx
`conversion in the desired 200 -- 350°C temperature
`regime under conditions having low N02/NOx ratios.
`From previous studies, Cu/zeolite formulations have
`demonstrated never-to-exceed
`temperatures up
`to
`In this work, a laboratory flow reactor was
`775°C.
`utilized to hydrothermally age and evaluate tl1e latest
`state-of-the-art Cu/zeolite formulations. Results confirm
`remarkable high temperature hydrothermal stability up to
`950°C while maintaining stable low temperature NOx
`activity.
`A broad
`range of
`time-at-temperature
`hydrothermal aging was carried out to clearly define the
`full durability range. n1e aging time was varied from 1
`hour to 256 hours while the aging temperature was
`varied from 670 °C to i 100 °C. The catalyst performance
`was evaluated under a synthetic exhaust gas mixture
`commonly known as the "Standard" SCR reaction.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`the Federal Test
`The operating conditions over
`Procedure (FTP) results in high NOx emissions in the
`200 --· 350°C temperature range. From current ligl1t·duty
`
`diesel applications, the future Tier :?. Bin 5 em1smon
`standards will require up to 90"/o reduction in the tailpipe
`NOx emissions.
`
`Implementation of zeolite based components has been
`extensively studied for application in gasoline and diesel
`aftertreatment devices.
`However,
`the harsh high
`exhaust
`temperatures observed
`in
`typical gasoline
`vehicles have limited their widespread use. On the other
`hand, the relatively milder diesel exhaust temperatures
`have encouraged continued development of zeolites as a
`major component in aftertreatment devices.
`
`tecl1nology
`aftertreatrnent
`diesel
`prom1smg
`One
`containing zeolite is the Selective Catalytic Reduction
`(SCR) of NOx with an ammonia-based reductant such as
`aqueous urea. As stated in equation ( i), NOx reduction
`is possible due to the high selectivity of the ammonia
`(NHa) and nitrogen oxide (NO) reaction to form elemental
`In the absence of nitrogen dioxide (NO;:), this
`N2•
`reaction is referred to as the ''Standard" SCR reaction
`[i ]. Additionally, the SCR reaction containing 50% NO
`and 50% N02 is referred to as the "Fast" SCR reaction
`(equation 2).
`
`"Standard"
`
`( 1)
`
`"Fast"
`
`(2)
`
`Vanadium, Fe/zeolite, and Cu/zeolite based SCR
`formulations are very active for the "Standard" SCR
`reactions. However, vanadium based formulations have
`been shown to easily deactivate when exposed to
`temperatures necessary to actively regenerate Diesel
`particulate filters (DPFs) with oxygen [2]. This cannot be
`avoided since a DPF is currently required to meet Tier 2
`Bin 5 particulate matter (PM} emission standards.
`Fe/zeolites have been shown to be much more durable
`to high temperature exposure. However, in the absence
`of N02, Fe/zeolites lack the low temperature (200 ·
`35ocq NOx activity necessary for high FTP efficiency.
`In this critical temperature range, Cu/zeolite formulations
`have been reported to have much lower s;::nsitlvity to the
`N02/NOx ratio. As a result, Cu/zeolite formulations have
`been shown to achieve hiqh NOx conversion at the
`desired
`low operating tem-peratures.
`Their lack of
`hydrothermal stability above T75 °C has drawn questions
`
`SAE Int. J. Fueis Lu!Jr. I Voiume 1 I Issue 1
`
`4"77
`
`Exhibit 2002.001
`
`

`
`EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF STANLEY ROTH, PH,D, UNDER 37 C.F.R. § U32
`
`14%0i
`5"/a H20
`5%1C02
`Balance N~
`€L44 nters/min
`
`4 i:::::::
`
`Cordierite
`
`DIAGRAM 1. Sample configuration during hydrotherrnai aging.
`
`A wide range of time-at-temperature hydrothermal aging
`was carried out to clearly define tile full durability range
`of a promising Cu/zeolite SCR
`formulation.
`The
`hydrothermal aging duration was varied from 1 hour to
`256 hours while the aging temperature was varied from
`670"C to 1100"C. Totaling ii 16 aging hours, Table i
`defines the 24 different aging conditions utilized in this
`study. Special attention was considered to determine
`the shoti-term never-to-exceed (NTE) temperature and
`the long··term SCR durability necessary to withstand the
`temperature resulting frorn DPF regeneration events.
`For a given aging duration, the NTE is defined as the
`temperature at which
`the NOx conversion decay
`accelerates significantly.
`
`about their long-term in-use durability and robustness to
`occasional oveHemperature events.
`
`Improvements in the thermal durability of Cu/zeo!ite
`based SCR formulations has been higt1!y desirable and
`pursued by many research
`institutes and catalyst
`suppliers.
`
`This paper discusses the performance and hydrothermal
`durability of an enhanced Cu/zeolite based SCR
`low temperature NOx
`formulation exhibiting durable
`activity under a wide matrix of time-at-temperature aging
`conditions.
`On key aged samples, surface area
`measurements and Cu reduction measurements are
`performed to investigate changes in the zeolite and Cu
`state, respectively.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`
`SAMPLE PREPARATION
`
`A full size monolith washcoated with a state-of-the-mi
`Cu/zeolite based SCR formulation was obtained from a
`catalyst supplier in 2007. The cordierite-based monolith
`measured 20.3cm diameter x 15.2cm length with 400
`cells per square inch (CPSI) and 4.5 mil wall thickness.
`The SCR monolith was completely cored and cut into
`i60 round samples measuring c:54cm diameter x
`2.54cm length. From this, a normal distribution was
`observed where the 95'% confidence interval around the
`mean mass was determined to be ± 0.4%. Older
`formulations mentioned in this paper did not necessarily
`exhibit the same distribution in mass.
`
`HYDROTHERMAL AGING
`
`i, sample cores were
`in Diagram
`As configured
`hydrothermally aged in flowing gas from an automated
`fiow reactor system. The total flow rate utilized was 6A4
`liters/min. The synthetic gas composition consisted ol
`14% 0 2 , 5% H~,o, 5% C02, and balance N2. For each
`aging,
`three samples rneasuring 2.54cm diameter x
`2.54cm length were placed in a quartz reactor tube and
`labeled A, 8, and C. The three SCR samples were
`separated by 30mm to ensure weli distributed gas flow in
`all channels. An uncoated cordierite monolith was
`placed upstream to serve as a gas heat exchanger. The
`an
`isothermal gas
`uncoa!ed monolith ensured
`temperature across each sample. Samples positioned in
`location "A" were used for surface area measurements.
`Samples positioned
`in
`location "B" were used
`for
`temperature-programmed
`reduction measurements
`(TPR). Samples positioned in location "C" were used for
`the NOx conversion evaluation tests.
`
`478 SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. i Volume 1 I Issue 1
`
`Mydrotherma! Aging Duration (hours}
`i 4
`8 ! 16
`··---~~~---- -······ ·······--·t-·-_ ....... J..
`
`Temp.
`
`("C)
`
`2
`
`7001X
`
`32
`
`64
`
`140 256
`
`t--x--+---+----1
`
`jX XX
`
`/X i
`
`_;t~-~~.~=L~~~
`
`...... 950jx···· .... x x ! .. x.
`,
`i
`x
`x
`
`1000
`1100
`'----!.........-.1.........-..<........-.J.---'----'--------- ~- -~-------.. -~~ .....
`
`I
`i
`I
`,
`~-----~
`I
`:
`
`TABLE 1. Time-at-temperature hydrothermal aging matrix.
`
`Exhibit 2002.002
`
`

`
`EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF STANLEY ROTH, PH,D, UNDER 37 C.F.R. § U32
`
`LABORATORY CATALYST EVALUATION
`
`Fundamental catalyst activity data were obtained using
`an automated
`laboratory-scale flow reactor system.
`Custom .. written labVIEW based software with National
`Instruments data acquisition hardware controlled MKS
`mass flow controllers and Lindberg Mini··Mite tubular
`furnaces. A computer controlled evaluation protocol was
`developed and run ior each sample to decrease the test(cid:173)
`to-test variations commonly observed by manual
`operation. Table 2 shows the simulated diesel exhaust
`gas composition flowed through each sample core to
`study the "Standard" SCR reaction.
`
`-----~-:~--~~~-~~~;~~---------- ------------------;~~~~~~;~~~~----------------1
`------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------i
`-I
`NO (ppm)
`350
`N02 (ppm)
`0

`·--------------NH~-(p·j;;)·--------------- --------------------------···35()·-------------·-··----------1
`
`!
`02 (%)
`14
`-----------------------------------------------------------------····------------------------j
`!
`5
`C02 (%)
`I
`s
`r----------------H~------------.
`[---------------~-~!~_n_c_~ _______________ J ___ -_---_______________
`-N_~_---_---_----------=---------_---~--J
`
`TABLE 2. Simulated gas composition used to study performance for
`the "Standard"' SCR reaction.
`
`For all evaluations, the total gas flow rate was held
`constant at 6.44 liters/min while the sample size was
`held constant at 2.54cm diameter x 2.54cm length. As a
`result, a space velocity equal to 30,000ihr was used in
`this study.
`For the typical light-duty diesel vehicle
`operating over the FTP drive cycle, this space velocity
`corresponds to a SCR monolith size between 100% -
`150% ol the engine swept volume.
`
`The SCR inlet gas temperature was maintained with one
`preheat tubular furnace followed by a second tubular
`furnace. SCR samples were loaded in quartz tubing and
`placed in the second tubular furnace. A Tl1ermo Electron
`Antaris IGS FT!R Oas Analyzer with a heated sample
`cell was used at the outlet of the reactor to measure NO,
`N02, N20, NH:3, C02, and H,.o levels. To cover the fuli
`exhaust ternperatures expected on diesel vehicles, data
`were
`taken at SCR
`inlet gas
`temperatures
`from
`approximately i50'C to 700°C in 25-50°C steps. Tl1e
`computer-controlled evaluation protocol stepped
`the
`reaction temperature setting from a high temperature to
`low temperature for a prescribed duration. At each
`temperature setting, the duration was chosen so that
`post SCR gas composition was allowed enough time to
`completely equilibrate.
`
`The fiow reactor used in this study was examined to
`determine
`the
`test-to-test variability of
`the entire
`measurement system. Among nurnerous variables, the
`
`FTIR measurement, the thermocouple measurement,
`and precision of
`the mass
`flow controllers may
`collectively contribute large discrepancies in the data.
`This may make it difficuit to conclude with confidence
`that one ·result is statistically diiferent than another result.
`Repeated evaluation runs were made on a single pre(cid:173)
`aged (64hr/670°C) SCR sample to determine the 95%
`confidence
`intervaL
`Five evaluation
`runs were
`pe1iormed over the entire temperature range.
`
`SURFACE AREA MEASUREMENTS
`
`A Micromeritics ASAP 2400 instrument in conjunction
`witri the well-known Brunauer, Emmet, and Teller (BET)
`equation was employed to determine the surface area of
`each SCR sample. The BET equation determines the
`surface area by establishing the relationship between the
`volurne adsorbed at a given partial pressure and the
`volume adsorbed at monolayer coverage [3].
`
`TEMPERATURE PROGRAMMED REDUCTION (TPR)
`
`The Cu state within zeolite lorrnulations changes during
`the SCR reaction and after tiydrothermal aging. These
`physical-chemical changes yield different
`reduction
`temperatures. The TPR results reveal direct evidence of
`changing Cu-species
`in
`the catalyst and rnay be
`correlated to the deactivation of SCR activity after aging.
`
`was
`(TPR)
`Temperature-Programmed-Reduction
`Ii 2920
`conducted on a Microrneritics AutoChem
`instrument. Part of a catalyst sample (location "B") was
`sliced off and cut into small pieces, about 3 mm long.
`These small pieces were then loaded into a quartz
`reactor for TPR. Typically, 0.5 ~iram oi sample was used
`in the experiment. The temperature was measured with
`a thermocouple in the catalyst bed. Prior to TPR, the
`catalyst sample was pretreated in 10%02/He at 600°C
`for 30 minutes and
`then cooled down
`to
`room
`temperature in 10°/o02/He. After the pretreatment, the
`gas fiow was changed to 9%H2iAr at :?.O ml/min. During
`TPR, the catalyst bed was heated to 600CC at a linearly
`rate of 1 o °C/min. The change
`increasing
`in H2
`concentration was monitored
`using
`Thermal(cid:173)
`Conductivity·Detector (TCD). The consumption of H2
`indicated the reduction of oxidized Cu.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`FLOW REACTOR VARIABILITY
`
`The variability of
`flow reactor was
`the evaluation
`determined by running a pre-aged SCR sample five
`times. The steady state "Standard" SCR reaction results
`for each of the five runs are overlaid in Figure 1.
`In
`addition, the 95% confidence interval around the mean
`
`SAE Int. J Fuels Lubr. i Volume 1 I Issue ·t
`
`479
`
`Exhibit 2002.003
`
`

`
`EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF STANLEY ROTH, PH,D, UNDER 37 C.F.R. § U32
`
`RECENT SCR DURABILITY IMPROVEMENTS
`
`Since current and future diesei aftertreatment systems
`formulations are
`required
`to
`contain DPFs, SCR
`withstand the high temperature process of regenerating
`soot-loaded particulate filters. A robust engine controi
`strategy
`that
`lessens
`the variability of
`the actual
`regeneration temperature is critical to the durability of the
`SCR. For this study, the target active DPF temperature
`has been determined to be 670"C. Also, the total
`cumulative duration for the full vel1icle useful life has
`been determined to be 64 hours. Therefore, the long(cid:173)
`term hydrothermal stabHiiy of base rnetal-zeolite SCR
`catalysts for typical light-duty diesel applications must be
`able to endure, at minimum, 670"C for 64 hours.
`
`Figure 3 shows the recent progress that has been made
`in Cu/zeo!ite SCR development. Many Cu/zeo!ite
`iorrnulations have been aged and evaluated betvveen
`Steady
`improvements of NOx
`2005 and 2007.
`conversion have been made in the low temperature
`range (200 - 350°C). For example, at 200°C, the NOx
`!n
`conversion has been enhanced from 70"/,, to 90%.
`addition, the 200"7 state·of-the··art SCR maintained 90%+
`NOx conversion over a much larger temperature range.
`However, note
`that
`the enhanced
`iow
`temperature
`activity came with a trade-off in the performance above
`400"C.
`
`1ll0
`
`SD
`
`80
`
`-~ ?()
`i:
`60
`0
`·~
`"' 50
`> c:
`0 u 40.
`x
`0
`z
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`NOx conversion is shown in Figure 2. From Figure 1,
`the NOx conversion traces are virtually line on line for
`operating temperatures beiow 600"C. Above 600"C, the
`NOx conversion drops slightly after each subsequent
`evaluation run. For this particular SCR formulation, the
`explanation for this slight deactivation has to do with the
`additional aging the sample experiences during high
`temperature performance evaluations.
`This
`trend
`becomes more apparent with data presented later in this
`paper. Figure 2 more clearly defines the variability in the
`overall now reactor system. The data from Figure 1 was
`manipulated in Minitab to yield the 95% confidence
`interval at each evaluation temperature. For evaluation
`temperatures below 600°C, the 95% confidence interval
`around the mean NOx conversion was better than ±2'?/c.
`Due to catalyst deactivation with testing, the higher
`temperature points showed variability up to ±6%.
`
`100
`
`90
`so
`7t1
`~
`60
`ao
`40
`
`" 0 '° '" >
`
`i::
`
`0 u
`"' 0 z
`
`30
`w
`1C ·
`O·
`
`-10
`
`·20
`
`-30
`100
`
`1 :SO WO
`
`250
`
`500
`450
`400
`350
`300
`Inlet Gas Temperature FC)
`
`550
`
`SOO
`
`SSO
`
`JOO
`
`FIGURE 1. NOx conversion results for the STANDARD SCR
`REACTION. Five consecutive evaluation runs on a single sample
`aged 64 hours at 6 70 "C.
`
`100
`
`150
`
`200
`
`350
`300
`250
`450
`~00
`ln!el Gas T empernlme (•C)
`
`500
`
`S50
`
`GOO
`
`Mean
`
`FIGURE 3. NOx conversion results for the STANDARD SCR
`REACTION. Best in class SCR ca1alys! formulations fmm 2005 --
`2007 after hydrothermal aging for 54 hours at 670"G.
`
`95% Confidence Lower Umil
`
`;7 ·!-. __________________ __ ,
`
`100
`
`150
`
`200
`
`250
`300
`350
`4'}0
`450
`500
`550
`Ave•age !rile! Gas Temperature (•C)
`
`600
`
`650
`
`?{}0
`
`FIGURE 2. Calculated from Figure ·1, the differential NOx conversion
`variability around the mean as determined by !he 95% confidence
`interval.
`
`480 SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. j Volume 1 I Issue 1
`
`formulations
`As shown in Figure 4, the three SCR
`generate measurable levels of N20 as a by-product.
`The N20 formation has a bi-modal profile as a function of
`low temperature N20
`temperature.
`The
`formation
`is a result of NH a oxidation by NO
`around 200 "C
`whereas the high temperature N20
`formation around
`525'C is mainly from the oxidation of NH3 by 0 2 . The
`latest SCR formulation generates much less N20. At
`200"C, the 200-7 SCR formulation yielded up to 3 fanes
`less N20 compared to the tvvo older iorrnulations.
`
`Exhibit 2002.004
`
`

`
`EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF STANLEY ROTH, PH,D, UNDER 37 C.F.R. § U32
`
`45
`
`40
`E' 35.
`"' "' -; 3!)
`" ~ 25
`E
`~ 20
`~ .. 15
`10.
`
`100
`
`1 SI)
`
`200
`
`250
`300
`'.J.50
`4.?0
`¢00
`Inlet G;;s Tempera!ure (•C)
`
`500
`
`55-0
`
`Q(U'J
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`'IS'
`"" 70
`s
`" 60
`" ~ 5(.1

`" 40.
`I.<.
`" 0 z 30.
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0 ·.
`100
`
`"!5(1
`
`:!00
`
`3fiV
`350
`400
`450
`250
`Inlet Gas Tempem!um ("C)
`
`500
`
`550
`
`GOV
`
`FIGURE 4. N20 iormalion resu!ls for the STANDARD SCR
`REACTION in Figure 1. Best in class SCR catalyst formulations from
`200E) - 2007 after hydrothermal aging for 64 hours at 670 "C.
`
`FIGURE 6. NOx formation (ppm) results for the ammonia oxidation
`reaction in the absence of NOx (FIGURE 5). Best in class SCR
`catalyst 1ormuiations from 2005 - 2007 alter hydrothermal aging for 64
`hours at 670"C.
`
`Durable low temperature NOx performance ls desirable
`ior
`light-duty diesel applications.
`However, a
`considerable amount of NOx
`is emitted at high
`temperature during the time when the vehicle undergoes
`an active DPF regeneration. This added NOx emission
`must be compensated by additional NOx conversion
`during
`low
`temperature operation.
`As mentioned
`previously, the high temperature NOx performance of the
`2007 SCR catalyst drops sharply as the temperature
`increases beyond 400"C (Figure 3). Figure 5 plots the
`NHs oxidation of the three catalysts in the absence of
`NOx. Ammonia is more strongly oxidized by the c~007
`SCR catalyst.
`In addition, a clear inflection point at
`400"C is observed which corresponds to the formation of
`NOx (Figure 6). As a result, the NOx performance in
`Figure 3 declines rapidly due to, in part, the remake of
`NOx from NH3 oxidation (Figure 6}.
`
`100.
`
`~~KKK~K~KK
`
`90
`
`so
`
`70
`
`f~
`" £!)
`.S!
`'iii
`·o
`·;;:
`0
`£ z
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`Unrefined engine exhaust temperature control during
`DPF
`regeneration events
`coupled with
`inexact
`temperature measurement may expose SCR catalysts to
`an occasional unexpected oveHernperature.
`As a
`result,
`the SCR
`formulations are screened with a
`robustness
`test protocol consisting of hydrothermal
`exposure at 900 °t~ for i hour. These types of data are
`used to define the short-term never-to-exceed (NTE)
`temperature. The NTE testinhl provides a higher degree
`of discrimination among similar performing formulations
`compared to the less severe 64hri670 "C standard aging.
`
`Figure 7 iilustrates the remarkable progress that has
`been made in the past year with tl1e durability of the 2007
`Cu/zeolite based SGR formulation. Among the dozens
`of Cuizeolite formulations tested
`in past years, no
`formulation has been able to withstanding exposure up
`to 900"C while maintaining stable NOx performance at
`200"C. Under the 1 hour/900"C aging condition, the
`2007 SCR catalyst retained 90°/,, NOx conversion at
`200 "C. Ali older SCR formulations have achieved no
`better than 20% NOx conversion.
`The enhanced
`durabHity of the 2007 SCR formulations has been mainly
`to advances
`in
`the zeolite
`type and
`attributed
`composition.
`
`...
`
`(-
`
`:I
`
`20
`
`10
`
`FIGURE 5. NH3 conversion results ior the ammonia oxidation
`reaction in the absence of NOx. Best in class SCR cataiyst
`formulalions from 2005 - 2007 alter hydrothermal aging for 64 hours
`al 670"C.
`
`SAE In/. J Fuels Lubr. I Volume 1 I Issue 1
`
`481
`
`Exhibit 2002.005
`
`

`
`EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF STANLEY ROTH, PH.D. UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.132
`
`100
`
`so
`eo
`c 70
`" 0
`~
`" 50
`> " 0
`" 0
`<:
`
`(.) 40
`aa
`
`60
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0 -
`100
`
`1.?t'l
`
`WO
`
`3{.V
`4SO
`250
`&00
`3SC
`inlet Gas Temperature !'C)
`
`500
`
`.?50
`
`500
`
`FIGURE 7. NOx conversion of bes! in class SCR catalyst
`formulations from 2005 - 2007 after hydrothermal aging for 1 hour at
`900"C.
`
`Based on these encouraging results, a more severe
`time-at-temperature aging study was undertaken with the
`2007 SCR iorrnulation defined in Figure 7. The aging
`and evaluation helped determine the full robustness map
`of this promising Cuizeoiite based SCR formulation.
`
`TIME-AT-TEMPERATURE PERFORMANCE
`
`Current diesel engines require a DPF to meet the Tier 2
`particulate matter standards. As a result, the SCR must
`be abie to tolerate extreme temperature swings due to
`typica! and non-typical active DPF regenerations. Aiso,
`the durability requirement of the SCR formulation will
`hinge largely on the location of the SCR relative to the
`DPF. SCR formulations placed directly upstream must
`withstand high exhaust temperatures generated from the
`engine or over a DOC. SCR formulations placed directly
`downstream of the DPF wi!i need to withstand extended
`temperatures coming from soot regeneration. However,
`the most severe conditions will likely arise from future
`combination systems where the DPF filter is coated with
`a SCR
`formulation.
`Clearly,
`for promising SCR
`lorrnulatioris in close relationship to the DPF, there is a
`need to determine the full temperature based durability
`map to better assess the thermal robustness.
`
`time-at-temperature hydrothermal
`A broad range of
`aging was carried out to clearly define the full durability
`range: The aging time was varied frorn i hour to 256
`hours while the aging temperature was varied from
`670"C to i 100'C. The catalyst NOx performance was
`based on the "Standard" SCR reaction, the "Fast" SCR
`reaction
`(in
`the
`reaction, and ammonia oxidation
`absence of NOx).
`
`the
`For
`the
`light-duty driving conditions,
`typical
`"Standard" SCR reaction is considered to be the most
`
`48.2 SAE Int. J. Fuels Lul1r. I Volume 1 I Issue 1
`
`chalienging since little or no N02
`250"C.
`
`is expected below
`
`The effect of long-term hydrothermal aging at 700'C
`versus duration was carried out in the laboratory. The
`duration was varied from 1 hour to 256 hours while the
`aging temperature was held constant at 700'C, NOx
`conversion as a function of temperature was measured
`on each individual sample. Results show that the 2007
`Cu/zeoiite SCR catalyst demonstrated outstanding
`stability (Figure 8). Recall that tile 64 hour aging
`duration has been calculated to be an equivalent of
`120,000 miles for a typical ligtlt-duty diesel. As long as
`the SCR catalyst temperature does not exceed 700"C,
`these results heighten the industry's confidence for
`successfully implementing a Cu/zeolite SCR formulation
`into production.
`
`10!i
`so
`BO
`
`70 -
`~ eo -
`c
`so
`0
`"(;)
`40 -
`~
`,,
`" "'
`;;o
`u w
`"' 0
`10
`z
`
`l)
`
`-1!i-
`
`n21)
`
`~30
`100
`
`r+-;;;;--100-c----1
`i .~ ... tGh-; ?fJOC i
`! -llB-64h,.7uOC i
`b-2%h~_?OOC !
`
`""i 50
`
`200
`
`25!)
`
`400
`350
`300
`fHH}
`~sn
`Inlet Gas Tempern!ure (2C)
`
`!iStl
`
`SfJO
`
`650
`
`700
`
`FIGURE 8. NOx conversion results tor the ST AND ARD SCR
`REACTION. SCR samples hydrothermally aged at ?OO''C tor-; hour -
`256 hours.
`
`For configurations where the SCR catalyst is piaced
`upstream ol the DPF, temperatures greater than 700"C
`are not expected normally.
`However, higher
`temperatures may be apparent for SCR catalysts placed
`for SCR
`immediately downstream of a DPF and
`formulations coated on the DPF itself. Therefore, the
`effect of long-term hydrothermal aging for up to 256
`The results
`hours at 800"C was also conducted.
`showing
`the NOx conversion as a
`function of
`temperature are plotted in Figure 9. The Cu/zeoiite SCR
`catalyst proved to demonstrate durable NOx conversion
`up to 64 hours. Further aging out to 140 hours and then
`out to 256 hours resulted in a continual decline in the low
`temperature NOx conversion. The high temperature
`f\JOx conversion declines steadily from i hour to 64
`hours but then mildly improves from 64 !lours to 256
`the higll NOx conversion becomes
`hours. Recall,
`negative due to aggressive oxidation of NH3 with 0 2 to
`yield NOx.
`
`Exhibit 2002.006
`
`

`
`EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF STANLEY ROTH, PH,D, UNDER 37 C.F.R. § U32
`
`Given the observed hydrothermal aging !imitation oi 64
`hours at 800'C, these data provide encouragement for
`the potential development of a single combined
`SCR/DPF substrate where
`the SCR
`formulation
`is
`coated within the DPF substrate. This consolidation
`would provide smaller vehicle packaging and lower cost
`possibilities.
`
`Figure 11 shows the NOx conversion results for samples
`hydrothermally aged at 950"C for 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours.
`The Cu/zeolite formulation can only tolerate i hour
`exposure to 950'C. Tl1ere is a significant drop in
`performance af1er 2 hours and complete deactivation
`after only 4 hours of exposure.
`
`00
`
`lGQ r---==:a=~!§::'.~-------;-.:===::::;i
`-11>-1 h~ __ 950C i
`go .
`-~~!
`-111-4hr ___ S50C i
`~~~_r.,.~5_0('.: __ j
`
`70
`
`100
`
`90
`
`BO
`
`70
`
`60.
`
`50
`
`4Q
`
`30
`
`20
`10.
`
`0.
`
`l
`" " -~
`"' "' §
`" 0 z
`
`(.)
`
`·10
`
`.2()
`
`-30
`100
`
`r+·.;;;;-·e;;r;c;··1
`1-$-iBh~ __ EOOC
`·:
`I ·0· 32h•· BOOC !
`-lll-o4hr~eooc i
`
`1 ,50
`
`200
`
`:.:sv
`
`500
`450
`400
`350
`:JOO
`iniel Gas Temperature (~C)
`
`5SV
`
`tiM
`
`650
`
`700
`
`-30 -~---------------------!
`
`soo
`300
`350
`400
`450
`lnlet Gas Temperature ('C)
`
`550
`
`GOO
`
`fiStl
`
`700
`
`10-fJ
`
`~so
`
`200
`
`250
`
`FIGURE 9. NOx conversion results for the STANDARD SCR
`REACTION. SCR samples hydrothermal!y aged at 80Q~ for i hour -
`256 hours.
`
`FIGURE 11. NOx conversion resuits for the STANDARD SCR
`REACTION. SCR samples hydroti1ermaliy aged at -~~Q_".Q. for i hour -
`8 hours.
`
`For a i hour exposure, the sllorHerm never-to-exceed
`(NTE)
`temperature
`is defined as
`the maximum
`temperature the SCR formulation can tolerate without
`showing signs of significant deactivation. This
`is
`particularly helpful for use by engine control calibration
`engineers., Figure ·12 sllows the NOx conversion results
`for samples hydrothermally aged
`ior
`i hour wHh
`temperatures ranging from 700 °C to 1100 °C. The results
`indicated that the NTE temperature was 950°C but
`without much margin for error. For example, at 250"C,
`increasing the aging temperature from 950 ''C to 1000 "C
`decreased the NOx conversion from 95% to 18%. At
`1 "lOO'C, the NOx conversion was further reduced to 0"1o.
`It was clear tl1at structural damage occurred and further
`work to understand the deactivation will be carried out in
`the near future.
`
`Figure 10 shows the NOx conversion results for samples
`hydrothermally aged at 900'C for durations from 1 hour
`to 64 hours. Durable NOx conversion is observed up to 4
`hours. The Cu/zeolite cannot tolerate 8 hours and the
`performance is completely destroyed with the individual
`samples aged out to 16 hours and beyond.
`
`H}{}
`so.
`so
`70
`
`GO
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`-IO
`
`-20
`
`! -$-16!·n_9fJ>JC i
`• -lli-S4hr__B00~j
`
`l
`c
`0
`·~
`
`"' > "' ,,
`"' 0 :z
`
`0
`
`.,30
`IC>ll
`
`153
`
`2fi0
`
`250
`
`300
`lSO
`400
`453
`500
`lnlel Gas Tempernlure (•C)
`
`550
`
`GOO
`
`fiSO
`
`700
`
`FIGURE 10. NOx conversion results for the STANDARD SCR
`REACTION. SCR samples hydrothermally aged at 900"C ior i hour-·
`64 hours.
`
`SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. I Volume 1 I issue 1
`
`Exhibit 2002.007
`
`

`
`EXHIBITS TO DECLARATION OF STANLEY ROTH, PH.D. UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 1.132
`
`"Standard'' SCR Reaction but with slightly better activity
`at the low to moderate temperatures.
`
`1C!l.
`
`SO
`
`83
`
`70
`~
`" 0
`·~
`" ,.
`g
`"' 0 z
`
`40
`
`30
`w
`10
`
`(.)
`
`-~04hr_700C
`
`...,64hr_800C
`
`.....,64hr __ 850C
`
`15-0
`
`2M
`
`2SO
`
`.500
`400
`400
`350
`300
`inlet Gas Temperature (2C)
`
`?50
`
`GGn
`
`f).>0
`
`100
`
`t:
`
`mu
`so.
`eo ·
`::o.
`SQ
`~
`50.
`" ]?
`40.
`:;o.
`"' >
`20
`i:; "' u
`10
`"' 0 :z
`0
`-10
`-20
`-30
`-40
`-50 .
`10V
`
`FlGUF!E 12. Short-term Never-To-Exceed (NTE) Temperature: NOx
`conversion results for the STANDARD SCR REACTION. SCR
`samples hydroihermally aged at i hour from 700"C -110occ.
`
`100
`
`150
`
`200
`
`253
`
`500
`450
`4t>J
`350
`300
`Inlet Gas Temperature !'Ci
`
`550
`
`500
`
`GSiJ
`
`700
`
`FIGURE ·14. NOx conversion results for the FAST SCR REACTION.
`SCR samples hydrothermally aged at 64 hours from fJ70"C -- 900"C.
`
`Figure 13 shows the NOx conversion results for samples
`hydrothermally aged for 64 hours and temperature
`exoosure from 670"C to 900"C. For the baselirn~. 64
`ho'urs at 670"C aging (120k mi equivalent), the Cu/zeolite
`activity data clearly shows > 90°/o NOx conversion in the
`200"C - 350"C temperature window. However, the
`maximum temperature for tilis extended duration is
`800"C. An additional 50"C, corresponding to 850"C, had
`a severe impact on the catalyst durability.
`
`100
`su ·
`80
`·m
`
`-1>-S'iiir _70GC
`
`-111-64hr_800C
`
`~u.
`
`~ 60.
`c
`SC
`0 -ra
`lo
`>
`"' ()
`3l)
`() 20.
`x
`0
`z
`
`10
`
`-10
`
`-20.
`
`Inlet Gas Temperature ("C)
`
`FlGURE 13. NOx conversion results tor the STANDARD SCR
`REACTION. SCR samples hydrothermally aged at 64 hours from
`6?0"C --- 900'C.
`
`The same identical samples presented in Figures 8 - 13
`were further evaluated under two other SCR reactions.
`These reactions were the "Fast" SCR Reaction and
`"Ammonia Oxidation" Reaction in the absence of NOx.
`Comparison of Figure 13 and Figure 14, the data
`resulting from the "Fast" SCR Reaction experiments
`yielded the same trends in NOx performance as the
`
`484 SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. I Volume 1 l Issue 1
`
`illustrated in Figure 15, the ammonia oxidation
`As
`evaluation in tt1e absence of NOx yielded curves showing
`the deactivation of the catalyst with respect to time-at(cid:173)
`temperature. The results show a similar deactivation
`trend as the NOx performance.
`
`~~l;i{f:(,. 6'iOC
`
`#+~fNhr _ _7cnc
`
`-11!-64hr_SGOC
`
`"*"S4hr __ 850C
`
`.....64hr_900C
`
`mo
`
`~c
`
`80
`
`fi3 -
`
`~ ..
`"' 70
`i:;
`"'
`'§
`"' SC
`> " 0

`z
`
`(.)
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`rn.
`o .L. ~lE1!iia:~~--~=-;:d::::::".:......,_~--1
`HiO
`HiO
`24!0
`250
`300
`3S!l
`400
`4511
`Sfl3
`StiO
`600
`f.50
`700
`Inlet Gas Temperature (2C)
`
`FlGURE 15. NH3 conversion results !or the AMMONIA OXiDATION
`REACTION in the absence of NCk SCR samples hydrothermally
`aged a1 64 hours from 670 "C - 900 "C.
`
`The results just described were for samples aged for 64
`hours but at varying temperatures, Furthermore, the
`corresponding samples aged at the various other aging
`conditions showed a similar deactivation trend as the
`corresponding NOx perrormance. As a result, these
`data sets of NOx conversion and NH3 oxidation have
`been excluded from this paper for brevity.
`
`Exhibit 2002.008
`
`

`
`~ 0.7 ---"lc---·+--·+--++-H1~,•H-·--------+----+·+--l--+L\'-l+-----·---1------~----'--'--1--U-i.I
`\
`~
`:;a O.G
`\
`1\\900· ....
`w
`1- o.5 ---·\t-----r--Tt:t-t-H--'1:--t--t--f-C-H-H-\--,;e~.-+--+++H+l
`w
`\
`\<IUUC
`"' .. ..
`\
`MD'•----------f+-f--+-t-+-H-l+----~+---+---i--++-H+l~------f----•!---+·-l--f-4-4-1-!
`~
`, .. L--4--4--H+L-\~------H!l!l-----1----i---'--L-1-Hl
`ill
`950'i
`""'
`~ 0.3
`---
`_____ ,,,,0
`. I
`0.1 !---t----+---~!-'i><H-i--H---+---+--+4+H1Hi·+-----i-l--+--!-l~
`ii I\ 1111
`ii
`~ii
`
`\
`
`\
`
`'
`
`•
`
`0 0.2
`
`; ; : :
`
`! \ .
`
`BET SURFACE AREA MEASUREMENTS
`
`The BET surface area of samples located in

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket