throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 34
`Entered: May 2, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`UMICORE AG & CO. KG,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BASF CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-011251
`Patents 7,601,662 and 8,404,203
`____________
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY, JO-ANNE M. KOKOSKI, and
`JEFFREY W. ABRAHAM, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ABRAHAM, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5, 42.123(b)
`
`
`1 This order addresses similar topics in four cases. We exercise our
`discretion to issue a single Order, to be filed in each case. The parties are
`not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125
`Patents 7,601,662 and 8,404,203
`
`
`On April 29, 2016, a conference call was held between counsel for the
`parties and Judges Crumbley, Kokoski, and Abraham. The purpose of the
`call was to discuss Patent Owner’s request for authorization to file a motion
`to submit supplemental information pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.123(b),
`which pertains to the submission of supplemental information more than one
`month after the date trial is instituted.2 Specifically, Patent Owner seeks to
`submit a copy of U.S. Patent Application No. 2016/0038875 (“the ’875
`application”), published February 11, 2016, the day before Patent Owner’s
`response to the Petition was due. Patent Owner argues that the ’875
`application, filed by Petitioner, contains information that is inconsistent with
`positions taken by Petitioner in these proceedings.
`Petitioner opposes Patent Owner’s request. Specifically, during the
`conference call, Petitioner questioned the relevance of the ’875 application
`and argued that Patent Owner reasonably could have obtained the
`supplemental information earlier. Petitioner also argued that it would be
`prejudiced by allowing Patent Owner to file its motion to submit
`supplemental information at this stage of the proceedings, because, inter
`alia, depositions are over and Petitioner’s Reply is due on May 13, 2016.
`After considering the parties’ arguments, we authorize Patent Owner
`to file an eight-page motion to submit supplemental information by Friday,
`May 13, 2016. Petitioner is authorized to file an eight-page opposition by
`Tuesday, May 24, 2016. No reply is authorized at this time.
`
`
`2 In IPR2015-01121 and IPR2015-01125, we instituted trial on October 29,
`2015. In IPR2015-01123 and IPR2015-01124, we instituted trial on
`November 2, 2015.
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125
`Patents 7,601,662 and 8,404,203
`
`
`Pursuant to section 42.123(b) of our Rules, Patent Owner’s motion
`“must show why the supplemental information reasonably could not have
`been obtained earlier, and that consideration of the supplemental information
`would be in the interests-of-justice.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.123(b). Furthermore,
`with regard to Petitioner’s arguments regarding prejudice, because the ’875
`application is currently not part of the record, Petitioner need not address it
`in its Reply, which is currently due May 13, 2016. The Board may, if
`appropriate, permit the parties to submit further briefing addressing the ’875
`application if Patent Owner’s motion to submit supplemental information is
`granted.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s request for authorization to file a
`motion to submit supplemental information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.123(b) is
`granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion shall be no more
`than eight (8) pages and filed no later than May 13, 2016;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is authorized to file an
`opposition to Patent Owner’s motion, which shall be no more than eight (8)
`pages and filed no later than May 24, 2016; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that no reply is authorized at this time.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01121, IPR2015-01123, IPR2015-01124, IPR2015-01125
`Patents 7,601,662 and 8,404,203
`
`PETITIONER:
`Elizabeth Gardener
`E1APTABDocket@orrick.com
`Richard DeLucia
`rdelucia@orrick.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Brian Ferguson
`brian.ferguson@weil.com
`Anish Desai
`anish.desai@weil.com
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket