throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 40
`
` Entered: June 17, 2016
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`HORIZON THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01117 (Patent 8,642,012 B2)
`Case IPR2015-01127 (Patent 8,404,215 B1)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DEBORAH KATZ, and
`GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in both cases. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent
`papers.
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2015-01117 (Patent 8,642,012 B2)
`Case IPR2015-01127 (Patent 8,404,215 B1)
`
`With respect to the “first” matter discussed in the attached email from
`
`Patent Owner, Patent Owner is authorized to file, within five (5) business
`days of the date of this Order, corrected Patent Owner Responses in
`IPR2015-01117 and IPR2015-01127, for the sole purpose of correcting the
`citations to Exhibit 2012 in each case.
`Petitioner is authorized to file, within five (5) business days of the
`date of Patent Owner’s corrected Patent Owner Responses, a reply, not to
`exceed three (3) pages, for the sole purpose of responding to Patent Owner’s
`arguments based on the correct citations to Exhibit 2012. Arguments not
`directed to Patent Owner’s corrected citations will not be considered. No
`other briefing on Petitioner’s part is authorized. No other briefing on Patent
`Owner’s part is authorized.
`With respect to the “second” matter discussed in Patent Owner’s
`email, Patent Owner is not authorized to file any other papers. The Board
`will determine what arguments, if any, are improper.
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to file, within five (5)
`
`business days of the date of this Order, corrected Patent Owner Responses in
`IPR2015-01117 and IPR2015-01127, for the sole purpose of correcting
`citations to Exhibit 2012;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is authorized to file, within five
`(5) days of the date of Patent Owner’s corrected Patent Owner Responses, a
`reply, not to exceed three (3) pages, for the sole purpose of responding to
`Patent Owner’s arguments based on the correct citations to Exhibit 2012;
`and
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that no other briefing is authorized.
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2015-01117 (Patent 8,642,012 B2)
`Case IPR2015-01127 (Patent 8,404,215 B1)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`David H. Silverstein
`Aziz Burgy
`AXINN, VELTROP & HARKRIDER LLP
`dsilverstein@axinn.com
`aburgy@axinn.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Robert Green
`Emer L. Simic
`Jessica Tyrus
`GREEN, GRIFFITH & BORG-BREEN, LLP
`rgreen@greengriffith.com
`esimic@greengriffith.com
`jtyrus@greengriffith.com
`Lauren Stevens
`HORIZON PHARMA USA, INC.
`lstevens@horizonpharma.com
`Dennis Bennett
`GLOBAL PATENT GROUP, LLC
`dennisbennett@globalpatentgroup.com
`Matthew C. Phillips
`RENAISSANCE IP LAW GROUP LLP
`matthew.phillips@renaissanceiplaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2015-01117 (Patent 8,642,012 B2)
`Case IPR2015-01127 (Patent 8,404,215 B1)
`
`
`ATTACHMENT
`
`From: Emer Simic [mailto:esimic@greengriffith.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 3:02 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Robert Green <rgreen@greengriffith.com>; Dennis Bennett
`<dennisbennett@globalpatentgroup.com>; Lauren Stevens <LStevens@horizonpharma.com>;
`Matt Phillips <matthew.phillips@renaissanceiplaw.com>; Burgy, Aziz <aburgy@axinn.com>;
`Silverstein, David H. <DSilverstein@axinn.com>; Holland, Elizabeth J.
`<EHolland@goodwinprocter.com>; Hardman, Cynthia <CHardman@goodwinprocter.com>;
`Jessica Tyrus <jtyrus@greengriffith.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01117 (joined with IPR2016-00283) and IPR2015-01127 (joined with
`IPR2016-00284)
`
`To the Board:
`
`I write on behalf of Patent Owner to respectfully request a teleconference with the Board to
`address two separate matters.
`
`First, it has come to our attention upon receipt of Petitioner’s Reply that the Patent Owner
`Responses submitted in IPR2015-01117 and IPR2015-01127 inadvertently cite to an earlier
`version of Petitioner’s expert, Dr. Sondheimer’s transcript (Sondheimer Transcript 3.10.16) and
`not his final transcript, Exhibit 2012. However, the earlier version of Dr. Sondheimer’s transcript
`and the final version were provided to Petitioner prior to filing of the Patent Owner
`Response. In its Reply, Petitioner indicates that it was aware of a global problem with citation to
`Exhibit 2012 in the Patent Owner Response (see Petitioner’s Reply in IPR2015-01127 at pp. 1-2,
`4) but did not seek clarification on this issue from Patent Owner or the Board. To clarify the
`record, Patent Owner requests leave from the Board to file corrected Patent Owner Responses
`for the sole purpose of correcting the citation to Exhibit 2012. Attached to this email are Patent
`Owner’s corrected Responses that have been redlined to indicate the corrected citations. In
`addition, we attach the earlier version of the Sondheimer transcript, to which the Patent Owner
`Responses currently cite and Exhibit 2012, to which the corrected Patent Owner Responses cite,
`both of which have been highlighted to show the corresponding citations in the original and
`corrected responses. Patent Owner does not believe Petitioner will be prejudiced by the filing
`of the corrected Patent Owner Responses; however, Petitioner has objected to filing of the
`attached corrected responses on grounds of prejudice. Patent Owner apologizes for the
`additional burden placed on the Board in addressing this issue.
`
`The second matter Patent Owner seeks to raise with the Board relates to Petitioner’s Reply in
`IPR2015-01117 (Paper No. 30, filed May 27, 2016), which includes multiple arguments (listed
`below) that exceed the proper scope of the Reply and/or are improperly raised for the first time
`in Reply:
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case IPR2015-01117 (Patent 8,642,012 B2)
`Case IPR2015-01127 (Patent 8,404,215 B1)
`
`
`• Petitioner improperly relies on the Simell reference (Ex. 1005) for its alleged teaching
`of incomplete conversion of PAA to UPAGN in violation of 37 C.F.R. § 43.23(b). See
`Reply at 1, 6-7.
`• Petitioner improperly introduces new and previously undisclosed arguments in support
`of its claim construction position in violation of 37 C.F.R. § 43.23(b). See Reply at 3-4.
`• Petitioner improperly introduces a new and previously undisclosed argument relating
`to the coefficient of variation in support of its argument that a POSA would have been
`motivated to combine Brusilow ’91 with other prior art references in violation of 37
`C.F.R. § 43.23(b). See Reply at 20.
`
` In view of Petitioner’s violation of 37 C.F.R. § 42.23(b), Patent Owner requests leave from the
`Board to file a Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Reply. In the alternative, Patent Owner seeks leave
`from the Board to file a document identifying with particularity the improper arguments raised
`in Petitioner’s Reply and/or seeks leave to file a Sur-reply to respond to the new subject matter
`in the Reply.
`
`The Parties have met and conferred regarding the aforementioned matter but have been unable
`to reach agreement. The Parties are available for a teleconference with the Board the afternoon
`of June 10, 2016. Please let us know the Board’s availability for a teleconference.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Emer L. Simic
`Member
`
`Green, Griffith & Borg-Breen LLP
`esimic@greengriffith.com
`Main: 312.883.8000 | Direct: 312.883.8017
`NBC Tower, 455 North Cityfront Plaza Drive, Suite 3100
`Chicago, Illinois 60611
`greengriffith.com
`
`This email transmission is confidential and intended solely for the person or
`organization to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential
`information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take
`any action in reliance on the information contained in this email. If you have received
`this email in error, please notify the sender as soon as possible and delete the email and
`any attachments from your system. Thank you.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket