throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`
`
`PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`HYPERION THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`_____________________
`
`Case IPR2015-01117
`Patent 8,642,012
`_____________________
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.62
`TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY PATENT OWNER
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1034
`Par v. Hyperion, IPR2015-01117
`Page 1 of 7
`
`

`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.64(b)(1), Petitioner Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
`
` IPR2015-01117
`Patent No. 8,642,012
`Par’s Objections to Evidence
`
`
`objects as follows to the admissibility of evidence submitted by the Patent Owner
`
`on March 28, 2016.
`
`In this paper, a reference to “FRE” means the Federal Rules of Evidence, a
`
`reference to “CFR” means the Code of Federal Regulations, and “’012 patent”
`
`means U.S. Patent No. 8,642,012. All objections under FRE 802 (hearsay) apply
`
`to the extent Patent Owner relies on the exhibits identified in connection with that
`
`objection for the truth of the matter asserted therein.
`
`Exhibit descriptions provided in this table are Patent Owner’s exhibit list and
`
`are used for identification purposes only. The use of the description does not
`
`indicate that Petitioner agrees with the descriptions or characterizations of the
`
`documents.
`
`Exhibit
`
`Description
`
`2012 Transcript of Deposition of Dr. Neal Sondheimer,
`March 10-11, 2016
`
`2013 Gerard Berry & Robert Steiner, "Long-term
`management of patients with urea cycle disorders," J.
`Ped., 138(1):S56-61 (2001)
`
`Objection
`A, G, H, K, L1
`
`A, B, K, L, N,
`O
`
`
`1 Par also maintains each of its objections as stated in the March 10-11, 2016
`Deposition of Dr. Neal Sondheimer.
`
`
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1034
`Par v. Hyperion, IPR2015-01117
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`
` IPR2015-01117
`Patent No. 8,642,012
`Par’s Objections to Evidence
`
`
`2014
`
`Summar et al., “Unmasked Adult-Onset Urea Cycle
`Disorders in the Critical Care Setting,” Crit. Care Clin.,
`S1-S8 (2005)
`
`A, B, K, L, N,
`O
`
`2015 Geraghty, M.T. and Brusilow, S.W., “Disorders of the
`Urea Cycle,” in Liver Disease in Children, 827-842
`(2001)
`
`2016 Endo, F. et al., “Clinical Manifestations of Inborn
`Errors of the Urea Cycle and Related Metabolic
`Disorders During Childhood,” J. Nutrition, 134, 1605S-
`1069S (2004)
`
`2017 Maestri et al., “Long-term survival of patients with
`argininosuccinate synthetase deficiency,” J. Ped., 929-
`35 (1995)
`
`2018 Lichter-Konecki et al., “Ammonia control in children
`with urea cycle disorders (UCDs): Phase 2 comparison
`of sodium phenylbutyrate and glycerol phenylbutyrate,”
`Mol. Gen. & Metab., 103:323-29 (2011)
`
`2020
`
`Singh et al., “Nutritional Management of Urea Cycle
`Disorders,” in Presentation and Management of Urea
`Cycle Disorders Outside the Newborn Period, Critical
`Care Clinics, 21:S27-35 (2005)
`
`2023 The Urea Cycle Disorders Conference Group,
`Consensus Statement from a Conference for the
`Management of Patients with Urea Cycle Disorders, J.
`Ped. (Supplement) S1-S5 (2001)
`
`2025 BUPHENYL® Prescribing Information (2003)
`
`2026
`
`James et al., “The Conjugation of phenylacetic acid in
`man, subhuman primates and some non-primate
`species,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 182, 25-35 (1972)
`
`A, B, G, K, L,
`N, O
`
`A, B, K, L, N,
`O
`
`A, B, K, L, N,
`O
`
`A, B, C, D, E,
`F, K, L, N, O
`
`A, B, K, L, N,
`O
`
`A, B, G, K, L,
`N, O
`
`A, B, K, L, N,
`O
`
`A, B, K, L, N,
`O
`
`
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1034
`Par v. Hyperion, IPR2015-01117
`Page 3 of 7
`
`

`
` IPR2015-01117
`Patent No. 8,642,012
`Par’s Objections to Evidence
`
`
`2027 Ambrose, Power & Sherwin, “Further Studies on the
`Detoxication of Phenylacetic Acid,” J. Biol. Chem.,
`101, 669-675 (1933)
`
`2028 Horizon Therapeutics, Inc. v. Par Pharma., Inc., 14-cv-
`384 (E.D. Tex.), Joint Claim Construction Charts, D.I.
`80
`
`A, B, K, L, N,
`O
`
`A, K, L, O
`
`
`
`Objection Key:
`
`A: FRE 802 (hearsay).
`
`B:
`
`C:
`
`FRE 901 (lacking authentication).
`
`FRE 402 (relevance) the document is not relevant to any issue in this IPR
`
`proceeding because the purported date of the document is after the filing
`
`date of the ’012 patent or the prior art status is not clear.
`
`D: FRE 402 (relevance) to the extent the document is relied upon for secondary
`
`considerations of nonobviousness, there is no nexus to the claimed
`
`compositions and methods.
`
`E:
`
`FRE 403 (confusing, waste of time) the document is not relevant to any
`
`issue in this IPR proceeding because the purported date of the document is
`
`after the filing date of the ’012 patent or the prior art status is not clear.
`
`
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1034
`Par v. Hyperion, IPR2015-01117
`Page 4 of 7
`
`

`
` IPR2015-01117
`Patent No. 8,642,012
`Par’s Objections to Evidence
`
`FRE 403 (confusing, waste of time) to the extent the document is relied
`
`F:
`
`upon for secondary considerations of nonobviousness, there is no nexus to
`
`the claimed compositions and methods.
`
`G: FRE 106 (completeness) the document is incomplete and includes only a
`
`select portion of a larger document that in fairness should be considered
`
`along with this document.
`
`H: FRE 1001-1003 (best evidence).
`
`I:
`
`J:
`
`FRE 403, 901 (improper compilation).
`
`FRE 403 (cumulative).
`
`K: FRE 402 (relevance) the document is not relevant to any issue in the IPR
`
`proceeding.
`
`L:
`
`FRE 403 (confusing, waste of time) the document is not relevant to any
`
`issue in the IPR proceeding.
`
`M: No exhibit filed.
`
`N: FRE 602 (lack of personal knowledge).
`
`O: FRE 702/703 to the extent that the patent owner seeks to rely on statements
`
`made in an exhibit as improper expert opinion, the exhibit is objected to on
`
`the grounds that it: (i) is not based on sufficient facts or data; and/or (ii) is
`
`not the product of reliable principles and methods; and/or (iii) is unreliable
`
`
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1034
`Par v. Hyperion, IPR2015-01117
`Page 5 of 7
`
`

`
` IPR2015-01117
`Patent No. 8,642,012
`Par’s Objections to Evidence
`
`because the exhibit is not of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the
`
`field.
`
`P:
`
`FRE 1006 (improper summary).
`
`Date: April 4, 2016
`Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
`950 F Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20004
`Tel: (202) 912-4700
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`Aziz Burgy
`Registration No. 51,514
`Attorney for Petitioner
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1034
`Par v. Hyperion, IPR2015-01117
`Page 6 of 7
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e), 42.105(a))
`
` IPR2015-01117
`Patent No. 8,642,012
`Certificate of Service
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the above-captioned “Petitioner’s
`
`Objections Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.62 to Evidence Submitted by Patent Owner” was
`
`served in its entirety on April 4, 2016 upon the following parties via Electronic
`
`Mail:
`
`
`
`Lauren Stevens: lstevens@horizonpharma.com
`Matthew C. Phillips: matthew.phillips@renaissanceiplaw.com
`Dennis Bennett: dennisbennett@globalpatentgroup.com
`
`Robert Green: rgreen@greengriffith.com
`Emer Simic: esimic@greengriffith.com
`Jessica Tyrus: jtyrus@greengriffith.com
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`Aziz Burgy
`Registration No. 51,514
`Attorney for Petitioner
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
`
`
`Date: April 4, 2016
`Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
`950 F Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20004
`Tel: (202) 912-4700
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ex. 1034
`Par v. Hyperion, IPR2015-01117
`Page 7 of 7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket