throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`HYPERION THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`_____________________
`
`Case IPR2015-01117
`Patent 8,642,012
`_____________________
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION
`OF DECISION TO INSTITUTE INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
` IPR2015-01117
`Patent No. 8,642,012
`Petitioner’s Request For Clarification
`
`On November 4, 2015, the Board issued a Decision under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.108 (the “Decision”) inter alia authorizing inter partes review of claims 1–12
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 8,642,012 (“the ’012 patent”).
`
`In Section F, the Decision states that “Petitioner has demonstrated a
`
`reasonable likelihood of showing that claims 6 and 11 would have been obvious
`
`over Brusilow ’91, Sherwin, Shiple, Kasumov, and the ’979 patent.” See id. at 19
`
`(emphasis added). On page 21, however, the Decision states that under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103, claims 6 and 11 are unpatentable over Brusilow ’91, Sherwin, Shiple, and
`
`Kasumov. See Decision at 21 (Paper 13). The Decision has an apparent
`
`typographical error on page 21 because it omits the ’979 patent as part of the
`
`instituted ground for claims 6 and 11.
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board clarify its Decision so that the
`
`Granted grounds correspond to the Decision, specifically that claims 6 and 11 are
`
`obvious in view of Brusilow ’91, Sherwin, Shiple, Kasumov, and the ’979 patent,
`
`as reflected in Section F of the Decision.
`
`Date: May 13, 2016
`Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
`950 F Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20004
`Tel: (202) 912-4700
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`Aziz Burgy
`Registration No. 51,514
`Attorney for Petitioner
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
`
`
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e), 42.105(a))
`
` IPR2015-01117
`Patent No. 8,642,012
`Certificate of Service
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the above-captioned “Petitioner’s
`
`Request for Clarification of Decision to Institute Inter Partes Review” was served
`
`in its entirety on May 13, 2016 through the Patent Review Processing System, and
`
`additionally upon the following parties via Electronic Mail:
`
`
`
`Lauren Stevens: lstevens@horizonpharma.com
`Matthew C. Phillips: matthew.phillips@renaissanceiplaw.com
`Dennis Bennett: dennisbennett@globalpatentgroup.com
`
`Robert Green: rgreen@greengriffith.com
`Emer Simic: esimic@greengriffith.com
`Jessica Tyrus: jtyrus@greengriffith.com
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`Aziz Burgy
`Registration No. 51,514
`Attorney for Petitioner
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
`
`
`Date: May 13, 2016
`Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
`950 F Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20004
`Tel: (202) 912-4700

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket