throbber
126
`
`PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
`EX. 1021
`(Part 2 of 6)
`
`

`
`wo 20o6m5a79-4
`
`PCTlGB2005.='00-£539
`
`30
`
`Figure 16 shows an alternative by which OIP may act is through a reduction in
`
`the ammoniagenic amino acid, Glycine. Substantial reduction in Glycine is observed
`
`only in the OIP group.
`
`Figure 17 shows the isoleucine levels are very low to start with in each of the
`
`5
`
`groups but increases to twice normal values in the Isoleucine treated groups. The
`
`concentration in the Placebo group remains low and unchanged.
`
`Figure 18 shows the changes in the Omithine levels hi the patients over the
`
`course of treatment showing marked sustained increase in the concentrations of
`
`Ornithine which are significantly reduced to basal values on stopping the drug
`
`10
`
`indicating uptake in the different tissues.
`
`Example 13: The effect of ornithine and Qhenylbutyrate in the bile duct ligated
`
`l'_=i.t.
`
`15 Methods
`
`Induction of cirrhosis by bile duct ligation (BDL)
`
`Male Sprague—Dawley rats (200-250g) were used for this procedure. Following
`
`anaesthetisation, a rnid-line laparotarny was performed, the bile duct was exposed, triply
`
`ligated with 4.0 silk suture, and severed between the second and third ligature. The
`wound was closed in layers with absorb able suture, and the animal allowed to recover in
`
`20
`
`a quiet room before being returned to the animal storage facility. Animals were kept at a
`
`constant temperature (20°C) in a 12 hour lightfdark cycle with access to water and
`
`standard rodent chow ad libitum.
`
`After five weeks post BDL (or sham procedure) the animals were switched from
`
`25
`
`rodent chow to a complete liquid diet (Liquidiet, Bio—Serv, Frenchtown NJ, USA) to
`
`which was added an amino acid mixture mimicking the composition of haemoglobin
`
`(2.8g/Kg/day, Nutricia Cuijk, The Netherlands,Produ'ct No. 24143). At six weeks, under
`
`anaesthesia a right carotid arterial catheter was inserted and used to collect repeated
`
`blood samples. Following this procedure a baseline sample was collected prior to
`
`30
`
`administration of the study formulations by IP injection. The study groups were: BDL
`
`control + Saline (n=5), BDL + ornithine (0.22g/Kg, n=6) in saline IP, BDL +
`
`phenylbutyrate (0.3 g/Kg, n=7) in saline ]P, BDL + OP (0.22g/Kg 2’ 0.3 g/Kg, n=7) in
`
`saline IP.
`
`127
`
`127
`
`

`
`W0 200 GIDSG794
`
`PC TIC BZOOSIO 04539
`
`31
`
`Blood samples were collected into pre-cooled heparinsed tubes and stored on ice
`
`prior to processing. Plasma was collected following centrifugation (3,000rpm, 10 mins)
`
`and stored at -80°C prior to analyses.
`
`Ammonia, glucose, lactate and urea were measured using a COBAS Mira S
`
`according to manufacturers instructions. Amino acids were quantified by HPLC with
`
`fluorescence detection.
`
`Results
`
`In the cirrhotic bile duct ligated rat model there is a substantial increase in the
`
`10
`
`arterial plasma ammonia level (205 i 11 umolesr’L, mean :f: SEM) compared with
`
`healthy controls (25.6 :1: 2 p.mo1esfL, p<0.00l data, not shown). In this model we found
`
`that there was no change in the arterial ammonia levels over three hours in the saline
`
`treated placebo group.
`Figure 19 shows the change iI1 arterial plasma ammonia levels in BDL cirrhotic
`
`15
`
`rats following IP injections of saline (BDL control, n=5), omithine (Om, 0.22g/Kg,
`n=6), phenylbutyrate (PB, 0.3g/Kg, n=7) and ornithine phenylbutyrate (OP, 0.22g/Kg +
`0.3g/Kg, n='}'). * signifies p<0.05 for OP vs Om at 3 hours (2 way ANOVA).
`This figure shows that in the ornithine treated animals a slight decrease in
`
`ammonia concentration was detected, though this was not found to be different from
`
`20
`
`placebo. In the phenylbutyrate treated group a significant increase in plasma ammonia
`was found after 1 hour (p<0.01 vs all other groups), though this difference was found to
`
`be smaller at the three hour time point. This finding fits with the hypothesis that
`phenylbutyrate (phenylacetate) is only effective in subjects with raised glutamine
`concentrations. In the animals without ornithine supplementation which can be
`
`25
`
`metabolised to form glutamine the effects of P alone are undesirable and are potentially
`
`harmful. A significantly lower ammonia level was observed in the ornithine plus
`
`phenylbutyrate (OP) treated group. In these animals a sustained lowering of amrnonia
`was measured over the three hour duration of the study the levels of which were found
`
`to be significantly less than those in the ornithine only group at the end of the study
`
`30
`
`(P-<0.05).
`This clearly demonstrates that the combination of OP has greater efficacy in
`
`reducing plasma ammonia than either 0 or P alone. Furthermore, the increased plasma
`
`levels of ammonia may be detrimental in the P alone treated animals.
`
`128
`
`128
`
`

`
`W0 20o6m5s79-4
`
`PCTlGB2005.='00-£539
`
`32
`
`In a sub set of samples we examined the uptake of ornithine into the blood stream
`
`following I? injection of O or OP. Figure 20 shows the arterial ornithine concentration
`
`in the supplemented groups. It can be clearly seen that in both groups the plasma
`
`omithine concentration is markedly increased at 1 hour following the [P inj ection,
`
`which is subsequently reduced at 3 hours as this ornithine is rnetabolised in the body.
`
`No significant difference was found in plasma omithine concentration between these
`
`groups at any time point.
`
`This finding is important as it demonstrates that the chosen method of
`
`administration is effective in delivering ornithine in these animals. Furthermore, the
`
`10
`
`rapid uptake and observed decrease in plasma levels indicate that active metabolism of
`
`this amino acid is occurring.
`
`Example 14: The effect of ornithine, Qhenylbutyrate and isoleucine in the bile
`
`duct ligated rat
`
`15
`
`20
`
`Methods
`
`I
`
`Male Sprague-Dawley rats (200—250g) were used for this procedure. For the 48
`hrs prior to sacrifice the animals were switched from standard rodent chow to a
`complete liquid diet (Liquidiet, Bio-Serv, Frenchtown NJ, USA) to which was added an
`amino acid mixture mimicking the composition of haemoglobin (2.8g/Kg, Nutricia
`
`Cuijk, The Nether1ands,Product No. 24143). Acute liver failure (ALF) was induced 24
`hours prior to sacrifice by [P injection of galactosamine (1 g/Kg, Sigma, Poole UK) in
`
`saline (n=5 ir1 each group). Three hours prior to sacrifice animals were treated with
`
`either a formulation of OIP (ornithine 0.22g/Kg, isoleucine 0.25 g!Kg, phenylbutyrate
`
`25
`
`0.3g,:'Kg, in saline IP) or saline control. At the termination of the experiment arterial
`
`blood was collected into pre-cooled heparinised tubes and stored on ice until processing.
`
`Plasma was collected and stored as above. Ammonia was determined as above.
`
`Results
`
`30
`
`Arterial ammonia levels were found to be significantly reduced in acute liver
`
`failure rats treated with OIP compared with placebo controls (Pig. 21). This study was
`
`designed to test whether isoleucine in combination with omithine and phenylbutyrate
`
`(phenylacetate) would be able to effectively lower plasma ammonia. It has been
`
`129
`
`129
`
`

`
`W0 200 GIDSG794
`
`PC TIC BZOOSIO 04539
`
`33
`
`previously demonstrated that isoleucine alone does not effect amrnonia levels in human
`studies, though its efficacy in combination with O and P has not been previously tested.
`
`Figure 21 shows arterial plasma ammonia levels in a hyperammonaemic acute
`
`liver failure model for saline placebo (ALF) and 011’ treated (ALF + OIP). A
`
`significance level ofp<0.01 was found between these two groups (T—Test).
`This finding supports the hypothesis that isoleucine in combination with
`
`ornithine and phenylbutyrate is effective in reducing ammonia levels. These are in
`
`addition to the beneficial efiects of isoleucine previously described for protein
`
`synthesis.
`
`10
`
`Example 15: The effect of ornithine and pl: en1lbug_r1_-ate in the devascularized pig
`model
`
`Methods
`
`15
`
`Five pigs were randomised into four groups: acute liver failure
`
`(ALF)+p1acebo+placebo (n=2); ALF+Omithine-I-placebo; ALF+ Phenylbutyrate
`+placebo; ALF+OInithine and Phenylbutyrate. Pigs had catheters inserted into the
`femoral artery and vein, portal vein, renal vein and pulmonary artery. The experiment
`
`started at time= -lhr, when placebo or treatment infusions were started.
`
`20
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Placebo: 5% Dextrose over 3 hours, oral water placebo
`
`Ornithine alone: 0.3 g/Kg, 5% dextrose over 3hours intravascular drip
`
`Phenylbutyrate: 0.3g/Kg, 5% dextrose over 3hours intragastric feed
`
`Omithine + Phenylbutyrate: 0.3 g/Kg, 5% dextrose over 3houIs intravascular drip,
`
`0.3g/Kg, 5% dextrose over 3hoursi11tragastric feed.
`ALF was induced by portal vein anastamosis to the inferior vena cava and
`
`25
`
`subsequent hepatic artery ligation (devascularisation) at time= Ohr; infusions were
`stopped at t= +2hr and the experiment was terminated at time=8hr. Blood and urine
`samples were collected at time= O, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9hr for the measurement of regional
`annnonia and amino acid changes. At the end of the experiment a section of frontal
`
`30
`
`cortex was removed for brain water measurements.
`
`130
`
`130
`
`

`
`W0 2006i'056'?94
`
`PC TIC B2005l0 04539
`
`34
`
`Results
`
`Following ornithine infusion generating intracellular glutamate and the
`
`intragasuic supply of conjugating phenylacetate results suggest profound alteration in
`
`overall ammonia levels and glutamine utilization in this catastrophic model of liver
`
`failure.
`
`There is a consistent rise in the arterial ammonia concentration with time from
`
`devascularisation in the placebo treated animal (Figure 22), with some muscle
`
`production (Figure 23) and a large amount of ammonia coming from the gut (Figure
`
`24). This animal shows a modest muscle glutamine release (Figure 25) and appreciable
`
`10
`
`gut glutamine uptake (Figure 26).
`
`In the case ofthe omithine alone treated animal, the early ammonia rise is
`
`initially blunted, but rises thereafter to be the highest at termination of the experiment
`
`(Figure 22). There is a net uptake of ammonia by the muscle in this animal (Figure 24),
`
`with a comparable amount of glutamine being released from muscle — compared to the
`
`15
`
`placebo treated animal (Figure 25) with an increased gut uptake of glutamine (Figure
`
`26).
`
`Phenylbutyrate alone also shows an initial blunting of arterial ammonia levels,
`
`which quickly rises to levels comparable with ornithine alone at experiment termination
`
`(Figure 22) with little change in muscle ammonia uptake (Figure 23), but appreciable
`
`2.0
`
`gut production of ammonia (Figure 24). Interestingly, there is a net removal of
`
`glutamine by muscle with Phenylbutyrate alone treatment (Figure 25) with little overt
`
`effect on gut glutamine uptake, compared to placebo treated animal (Figure 26).
`
`The combination of ornithine and Phenylbutyrate has the greatest impact on
`
`arterial ammonia levels with an impressive reduction in circulating levels at the end of
`
`25
`
`the experiment compared to all the other animals (Figure 22). Ammonia is actively
`
`removed from the blood by muscle in this animal (Figure 23) with a greatly reduced gut
`
`ammonia production (Figure 24). It is interesting to note that the muscle glutamine
`release is increased compared to both the placebo and omithine alone treated animals
`
`(Figure 25). Despite this increased glutamine production i.n the muscle the gut
`
`30
`
`glutamine uptake is substantially reduced (Figure 26).
`
`A demonstration of increased circulating levels of ornithine in the ornithine
`
`treated animals is shown in Figure 27.
`
`131
`
`131
`
`

`
`W0 2006i'056'?94
`
`PC TIC B2005l0 04539
`
`The impact of the devascularisation and treatment interventions on arterial
`
`glutamine are shown in Figure 28. There is an increase in the circulating level of
`
`glutamine in the ornithine treated animal, which is ameliorated by the co-administration
`of phenylacetate. An interesting finding was the substantial amelioration of the arterial
`
`glycine levels that was found in the animal treated with both omithine and
`
`phenylbutyrate (Figure 29).
`
`At the end of the experiment the frontal cortex of the brain was removed and
`
`brain water content measured (Figure 30).
`
`An independent pathologist reported on the cellular anatomy of the brain in
`
`10
`
`these experimental animals. His report is summarized below.
`
`ALF: Microvessels with perivascular oedema with surrounding vesicles. Neuron
`
`with necrotic changes surrounded by vesicles.
`
`ALF + O+P: Microvessels with perivascular oedema with surrounding vesicles
`
`(less than from ALF without any treatment). Intracellular edema.
`
`15
`
`Sham: Brain tissue with minimal ultrastructural changes=normal brain tissue.
`
`Conclusions
`
`The inventors have found that simulation of some of the symptoms of an acute
`
`attack associated with chronic liver disease, such as increasing the concentration of
`
`20
`
`ammonia or simulating a gastrointestinal bleed, results in reduction of neutrophil
`
`function and this reduction can be partially reversed by ornithine or isoleucine. Rescue
`
`of neutrophil function by both omithine and isoleucine plays an important role in the
`
`prevention of sepsis which is a common precipitating factor ii: the progression of liver
`
`decompensation.
`
`25
`
`Furthennore, the inventors have found that isoleucine does not affect the rise in
`
`concentration of ammonia following a simulated gastrointestinal bleed. Therefore,
`
`contrary to the hypothesis that ammonia levels will decrease upon administration of
`
`isoleucine because of stimulation of protein synthesis, ammonia levels are unaffected.
`
`Thus, use of isoleucine in combination with ornithine, which is known to lower
`
`30
`
`ammonia levels, is particularly advantageous.
`
`Therefore, administration of ornithine and isoleucine prevent the metabolic
`
`consequences of a gastrointestinal bleed. Rising ammonia levels are blunted, the
`
`deficiency in isoleucine is corrected and neutrophil fiinction is rescued. The combined
`
`132
`
`132
`
`

`
`W0 200 GIDSG794
`
`PC TIC BZOOSIO 04539
`
`36
`
`use of ornithine and isoleucine therefore provides a new treatment for patients following
`
`a precipitating event to prevent liver decompensation fi-om occurring.
`The inventors have also found that L-ornithine L-aspartate (LOLA), which is
`
`used to reduce ammonia in patients with hepatic encephalopathy, does not reverse the
`
`effect of ammonia on neutrophil function. Thus, use of ornithine alone is more
`
`advantageous than use of LOLA, since omithine can both reduce ammonia and rescue
`neutrophil function. Also, the aspartate component of LOLA accumulates in the body.
`This accumulation of aspartate may actually by harmful to patients since aspartate
`
`worsens the effect of ammonia on neutrophil function, further reducing neutrophil
`
`10
`
`function. Accordingly, preventing or delaying the onset of liver decompensation can be
`
`achieved using ornithine in combination with isoleucine, preferably in the absence of
`
`aspartate.
`Furthennore, the inventors have found that treatment of patients with hepatic
`encephalopathy (I-IE) with L—o1nithine L-aspartate (LOLA) reduces ammonia levels and
`as a consequence, increases glutamine levels. However, glutamine is only a temporary
`ammonia buffer as it can recycle and regenerate ammonia in the kidney and the small
`
`15
`
`intestine. Therefore, treatment with LOLA alone can lead to a secondary rise in
`
`ammonia levels, further contributing to the pathology of hepatic encephalopathy.
`
`Use of phenylacetate or phenylbutyrate in children with urea cycle disorders
`reduces_ the abnormally high levels of glutamine. In contrast, patients suffering from HE
`
`20
`
`have normal levels of glutamine unless, as shown in Example 1, they are being treated
`
`with LOLA which reduces levels of ammonia but increases levels of glutamine.
`Therefore, use ofphenylacetate andfor phenylbutyrate allows for the removal of
`glutamine to prevent the secondary rise in ammonia levels in patients with HE.
`Accordingly, an improved treatment for hepatic encephalopathy can be achieved
`by administration of ornithine in combination with at least one of phenylacetate and
`
`25
`
`phenylbutyrate, preferably in the absence of aspartate.
`Our extensive investigations in animal models and also in humans with cirrhosis
`
`support the view that the major organ removing ammonia in patients with cirrhosis is
`the muscle, converting ammonia to glutamine, a reaction in which glutamate is utilised.
`
`30
`
`In liver failure, the enzyme responsible for this reaction, glutamine synthetase is
`
`induced and the provision of glutamate would increase ammonia detoxification.
`
`133
`
`133
`
`

`
`W0 20o6m5a79-4
`
`PCTlGB2005.='00-L539
`
`37
`
`Ornithine, a precursor of glutamate, detoxifies ammonia by transformation to
`
`glutamine. However, our preliminary studies have shown that this glutamine,
`
`recirculates and regenerates ammonia. Our invention provides a novel method of not
`
`only detoxifying ammonia into glutamine but also eliminating the excess glutamine that
`
`is generated. Thus, OP reduces ammonia concentration in patients with cirrhosis and
`
`hyperamrnonemia significantly more markedly than either alone. The effect is clearly
`
`synergistic rather than additive. In addition, postprandial increase in ammonia is
`
`abolished by administration of OP. This may allow for feeding of patients with
`
`decompensated cirrhosis with protein-rich diets without the risk of hyperammonemia.
`The reduction in ammonia was associated with improvement in the mental state.
`
`10
`
`It achieves reduction in ammonia concentration by preventing an increase in glutamine.
`
`This is consistent with the hypothesis that Ornithine is driving glutamine production in
`
`the muscle (thereby trapping 1 molecule of ammonia) but this glutamine is excreted
`
`(possibly as an adduct of phenylacetate) preventing a rise in systemic glutamine,
`
`15
`
`thereby preventing rebound hyperannnonemia.
`
`The established wisdom that phenylacetate reduces ammonia in the
`
`hyperammcnaemic infant presenting with urea cycle disorders is that the ammonia is
`trapped into glutamine and that the glutamine is shuttled to the kidneys for excretion as
`the phenylacetateglutamine adduct. These infants present with high ammonia and,
`importantly, high glutamine. Conversely the cirrhotic patient presents with high
`ammonia and normal to low glutamine. The pig model described above does not have a
`
`20
`
`raised glutamine and the ammonia levels increase dramatically after the liver is isolated.
`Treatment with omithine alone increases blood glutamine whereas ammonia
`
`levels are unaffected. Phenylbutyrate alone marginally increases glutamine and again
`
`25
`
`has insignificant effects on ammonia levels. In dramatic contrast, in this catastrophic
`
`model of escalating hyperammonaemia the combination of both ornithine and
`
`phenylbutyrate (OP) brings about an appreciable reduction in the circulating annnonia
`and ameliorates the increase in glutamine seen with ornithine alone. Glycine, an
`
`ammonia generating amino acid increased in all the animals, however, the rise in this
`
`30
`
`amino acid was substantially blunted only in the OP treated animal, suggesting
`
`additional benefit for this form of intervention. An established consequence of elevated
`
`amrnonia is brain swelling as water content of the brain increases. The brain from
`
`ornithine alone treated pig shows considerable increase in water content while the
`
`134
`
`134
`
`

`
`wo zoosm-56794
`
`PCTfGB2005.='00-L539
`
`3s
`
`onfithjne and phenylbutyrate combined reduces brain water content. I-Iistologically,
`
`there is less apparent injury in the microstructure of the brain of the ornithine and
`
`phenylbutyrate combined treatment animal compared to the placebo treated animal.
`
`135
`
`135
`
`

`
`W0 2006i'056'?94
`
`PCTlGB2005.='00-L539
`
`39
`
`CLAIMS
`
`1.
`
`Use of ornithine in the manufacture of a medicament for use in combination
`
`with at least one of phenylacetate and phenylbutyrate for preventing or treating liver
`
`decompensation or hepatic encephalopathy.
`
`2.
`
`Use of at least one of phenylacetate and phenylbutyrate in the manufacture of a
`
`medicament for use in combination with ornithine for preventing or treating liver
`
`decompensation or hepatic encephalopathy.
`
`10
`
`3.
`
`Use of ornithine and at least one of phenylacetate and phenylbutyrate in the
`
`manufacture of a medicament for preventing or treating liver decompensation or hepatic
`
`encephalopathy.
`
`15
`
`4.
`
`Use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said liver
`
`decompensation is in a patient with chronic liver disease.
`
`5.
`
`Use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said prevention or
`
`treatment involves delaying the onset of liver decompensation.
`
`20
`
`6.
`
`Use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the patient has had or
`
`is suspected of having had a precipitating event.
`
`7.
`
`Use according to claim 6, wherein said precipitating event is gastrointestinal
`
`25
`
`bleeding, infection, portal vein thrombosis or dehydration.
`
`8.
`
`Use according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the medicament is administered within 6
`
`hours of the sy1nptom(s) of a said precipitating event or suspected precipitating event
`
`having been detected.
`
`30
`
`9.
`
`Use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein hepatic
`
`encephalopathy is treated in a patient with chronic liver disease or acute liver failure.
`
`136
`
`136
`
`

`
`W0 200GIDSG794
`
`40
`
`PCTICBZOOSIO04539
`
`10.
`
`Use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said ornithine is
`
`present as a flee monomeric amino acid or physiologically acceptable salt.
`
`11.
`
`Use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the at least one of
`
`5
`
`phenylacetate and phenylbutyrate is present as sodium phenylacetate or sodium
`
`phenylbutyrate.
`
`12.
`
`Use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said medicament
`
`further comprises isoleucine.
`
`1 0
`
`13.
`
`Use according to claim 12 wherein said isoleucine is present as a free
`
`monomeric amino acid or physiologically acceptable salt.
`
`14.
`
`Use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said medicament
`
`15
`
`contains substantially no other amino acid.
`
`15.
`
`Use according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the medicament is
`
`formulated for intravenous, intraperitoneal, intragastric, intravascular or oral
`
`administration.
`
`20
`
`16.
`
`Products containing ornithine and at least one of phenylacetate and
`
`phenylbutyrate as a combined preparation for simultaneous, separate or sequential use
`for preventing or treating liver decompensation or hepatic encephalopathy.
`
`25
`
`17.
`
`Products according to claim 16 which further comprise isoleucine.
`
`18.
`
`Products according to claim 16 or 17 which comprises substantially no other
`
`amino acid.
`
`30
`
`19.
`
`A pharmaceutical composition comprising ornitliine and at least one of
`
`phenylacetate and phenylbutyrate.
`
`137
`
`137
`
`

`
`W0 zoosm-56794
`
`PCTfGB2005.='00-£539
`
`41
`
`20.
`
`A pharmaceutical composition according to claiIn 19 which further comprises
`
`isoleucine.
`
`21.
`
`A pharmaceutical composition according to claim 19 or 20 which comprises
`
`substantially no other amino acid.
`
`22.
`
`A pharmaceutical composition as defined in any one of claims 19 to 21 for use
`
`in a method of preventing or treating liver decompensation or hepatic encephalopathy.
`
`10
`
`23.
`
`An agent for preventing or treating liver decompensation or hepatic
`
`encephalopathy, comprising ornithine and at least one of phenylacetate and
`
`phenylbutyrate.
`
`24.
`
`An agent according to claim 23 which further comprises isoleucine.
`
`15
`
`25.
`
`A method of treating a patient having or at risk of having liver decompensation
`
`or hepatic encephalopathy, which method comprises administering an effective amount
`
`of ornithine and at least one ofphenylacetate and phenylbutyrate to said patient.
`
`20
`
`26.
`
`A method according to claim 25 which further comprises administering an
`
`effective amount of isoleucine to said patient.
`
`27.
`
`A method according to claim 26 wherein said patient has an isoleucine
`
`deficiency attributable to gastrointestinal bleeding.
`
`138
`
`138
`
`

`
`W0 2‘""”'“5“794
`
`PCT/GB2005m04539
`
`1115
`
`Figure 1
`
`.1. D 0
`
` N U1 %IncreaseInOxidativeBurst
`
`NI 0'!
`
`U1 0
`
`
`
`AH+
`
`Decomp
`
`Comp
`
`Normal
`
`phagocytosis
`%Neutrophil
`
`Norm
`
`40-so
`
`59-190
`
`>1 on
`
`Ammonia (pM)
`
`139
`
`139
`
`

`
`W0 2"‘W"5“7'94
`
`PCT/GB2ousmo4539
`
`2:15
`
`Figure 3
`
`25
`
`
`
`
`
`NeutrophilChemotaxis(hpf)
`
`Normal
`
`40-60
`
`60-100
`
`>1 OD
`
`Ammonia (mm)
`
`Figure 4
`
`*p=0.1 vs NH3
`
`p<0.001 vs NH3
`
`P<0.05 vs NH3
`
`
`
`Contra!
`
`NH3, 500
`NH3.5OCI NH3.5U0 NH3.50D_ NH3. 500
`+ LOLA
`+ Glulamme + Aspartate + Ornithine
`
`
`
`%neutrophilsphagocytosing
`
`140
`
`140
`
`

`
`W0 2(l(l6;"056?94
`
`PCT/GB2l)05mI)4539
`
`ms
`
`Figure5
`
`
`
`Pre
`
`Placebo
`
`Sim Bleed
`
`Sim B|eecl+lsoIeucine
`
`Figurefi
`
`Q 40
`.C
`--'
`35
`
`30
`25
`
`20
`15
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`lg
`><
`G
`‘I-5
`O
`
`E_
`
`:
`2
`
`‘E
`2..
`:3
`g
`
`500 I-
`
`400 -
`
`
`
`(nmollkgbwlmin)
`
`300
`
`200 r
`
`100 L
`
`Wb Ra
`
`Oxidation
`
`141
`
`141
`
`

`
`W0 2006l056'?94
`
`PCT;GB2005m04539
`
`4:15
`
`Figure 7
`
`—— lsoleucine
`"""“' Placebo
`
`
`
`150
`
`,...
`
`E E
`
`:
`
`,9 100
`
`:c E E
`
`‘E
`
`50
`
`0
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Time
`
`Figure 8
`
`0A: 40g!day
`over 12 hr
`
`515°” 0A
`
`1600
`
`140
`
`E 1200
`_§
`300
`‘g
`
`400
`
`6
`
`I
`
`Arnmony xx"
`I
`
`80
`
`130 --
`
`120 %
`110 -E
`100 E
`
`90
`
`__
`
`142
`
`142
`
`

`
`wo 2006l056794
`
`PCT;GB2o05mu4539
`
`sns
`
`Figure 9
`
`0A: 40g!day
`over 12 hr
`
`1200
`
`Stop OA
`
`Y
`
`120
`
`110 _
`5
`
`CE
`
`100 3
`S
`E
`q
`
`an
`
`30
`
`70
`
`360
`
`320
`
`230
`
`240
`
`200
`
`160
`
`__
`E
`_g
`5
`E
`E
`-at
`
`
`
`Figure 10
`
`l.V. Phenylacetate
`
`OA: 40g!day over 12 hr
`
`—--~
`
`"""
`
`E 900
`.3
`E
`3
`(3
`
`000
`
`300
`
`2100
`
`1800
`
`1500
`
`E
`--
`g
`E
`55
`.2
`(D
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`Days
`
`143
`
`

`
`W0 2006:'056794
`
`PC TIC B2005l0 0-I-539
`
`—u— Placebo
`
`
`
`
`
`-0- Ornithine
`
`-#~ Phenylbutyrate
`
`
`
`‘F Ornithine-
`
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6i'15
`
`Figure 11
`
`L Post prandial samples
`
`Treatments
`
`E 18
`
`
`
`3a
`
`o E E
`
`<
`
`s
`-E 15
`
`12
`
`9
`
`6
`
`O
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`100
`
`120
`
`Time (hr)
`
`Figure 12
`
`—n— Placebo
`
`-0- Ornithine
`
`—A+ Phenylbutyrate
`-‘F Omithine-
`
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`l Post prandial samples
`
`Treatments
`
`
`
`7:)
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`E0
`
`E E £
`
`53
`
`(D
`
`100
`
`120
`
`144
`
`144
`
`

`
`W0 2006l056'?94
`
`PCT;‘GB2005.='00-L539
`
`‘H15
`
`Figure 13
`
`Placebo
`
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`4
`
`:
`
`9
`
`"
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Days
`
`.
`.
`Ormthme
`
`i
`
`0
`
`T1 T?
`1
`2
`Days
`
`-IT IT
`3
`4
`
`3
`
`UJ
`:1:
`fl:
`1%
`5 1
`
`2
`
`0
`
`4
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Days
`
`Ornithine
`Phonylbutyrate
`
`Lu
`:1:
`‘*5
`-g
`E
`0
`
`3
`
`2
`
`
`
`Figure 14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`—~o— OIP
`-0- OIP
`
`
`
`—“‘“ Placebo
`"*7" ‘ Placebo
`—--69-- -~
`lsoleucine
`<-‘--
`Isoleucine
`
`Lu
`:1:
`3
`E
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`0
`
`4
`
`3
`
`Lu
`I
`‘*5
`% 2
`E
`(3
`1
`
`0
`
`fl"|I-
`
`E ‘
`
`*3
`.9:
`
`o E
`
`IX)45
`
`NI 0
`
`16
`
`12
`
`
`
`E
`-cl:
`
`3
`
`4
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`Hours
`
`40
`
`so
`
`60
`
`145
`
`145
`
`

`
`W0 2006l056794
`
`PC TIGBZOOSIU 0-I-539
`
`8i'15
`
`Figure 15
`
`43" Placebo
`"“"" Placebo
`--6
`lsoleucine
`.......o_
`
`—o—- OIP
`-9- OIF’
`
`
`
`120
`
`E105
`3:
`
`75
`
`E 33
`
`(D
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`“"“*—"' Placebo
`-'-‘B’-F Isoleucine
`-43- -
`Isoleucine
`
`-4- OIP
`
`50
`
`
`
`Glycine(pllll)83
`
`20
`
`Hours
`
`146
`
`146
`
`

`
`W0 200 61056794
`
`PC TIGBZOOSIU 0-I-539
`
`'3' Piacebo
`"““"“ Placebo
`lsoleuoine
`lsoleucine
`
`-ow ou=
`
`+ OIP
`
`_|. N
`
`{D
`
`
`
`lsoleucine(pM}
`
`9:1 5
`
`Figure 17
`
`Figure 18
`
`Placebo
`"F1
`'““*'*"“"' Placebo
`~?=
`[soleucine
`
`lsoleucine
`—'<%“'
`—o— OIP
`
`.
`
`To
`
`—9-" OIP
`
`
`
`15
`
`_\. N5
`
`_|. D
`
`
`
`Ornithine(uM)
`
`Hours
`
`147
`
`147
`
`

`
`W0 200 GIOSG794
`
`PC TIC B2005l0 04539
`
`10:" 1 5
`
`Figure 19
`
`Arterial ammonia in BDL rats
`
`--I— OP
`
`-' 1%“ °' Om
`- =W- - PB
`"<>'- BDL control
`
`
`
`360
`
`____
`E
`lg
`5 260
`
`E E
`
`<32
`
`160
`
`Time (hours)
`
`Figure 20
`
`Plasma Ornithine (|.IM)
`
`
`
`Ornithine(pm)
`
`1000
`
`03O388
`
`400
`200
`
`0
`
`_
`
`T
`
`D
`
`0.5
`
`1
`
`‘l .5
`
`2
`
`2.5
`
`3
`
`3.5
`
`Time (hr)
`
`148
`
`148
`
`

`
`W0 2006!056794
`
`PC TIGBZOOSIOU-I-539
`
`1 H15
`
`Figure 21
`
`(pM)
`
`Ammonia
`
`ALF
`
`(W-'5)
`
`ALF + DIP
`
`(|'I=5)
`
`Figure 22
`
`
`
`Treatment
`
`t_,_____-—
`
`_
`_
`-0- Ormthlne
`
`
`
`—A— Phenyfbutyrate
`
`
`
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`"'* 0rnithine—
`
`149
`
`149
`
`700
`
`600
`500
`
`400
`
`300
`
`200
`
`100
`
`
`
`Ammonia(pM)
`
`

`
`W0 200 61056794
`
`PC TIC B2005l0 04539
`
`1 2!] 5
`
`Figure 23
`
` —-— Placebo
`
`Ornithine
`
`Femoral Vein - Artery
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`Ornith ine-
`
`
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`
`
`
`SD
`
`40
`
`20
`
`uhO
`
`-40
`
`-so
`
`-80
`
`
`
`Ammonia(pm)
`
`I
`0
`
`r
`
`r
`2
`
`**-"
`
`'1
`4
`
`I
`6
`
`=
`
`a ——-
`3
`
`Time (hr)
`
`Figure 24
`
`—u— Placebo
`
`
`
`-0- Ornithine
`
`
`
`
`
`—A— Phenylbutyrate
`
`
`—"'— Ornithine-
`
`
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`
`
`
`
`0
`
`-
`
`T
`
`,
`
`8
`
`
`
`250 Portal drained viscera - Artery
`
`-I
`
`‘
`
`I
`
` #“”f
`
`O
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`Time (hr)
`
`150
`
`150
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`O
`
`E‘
`E
`-E
`
`E E
`
`;
`
`

`
`W0 200 61056794
`
`PC TIGBZOOSIU 0-I-539
`
`13.-"15
`
`Figure 25
`
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`uction!ReIease
`MuscieGlutamineProd
`
`
`
`Placebo Ornithine
`
`I
`
`5-
`
`Ornithine -
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`Figure 26
`
`Placebo Ornithine
`
`Phanyl-
`butyrate
`
`Ornithine -
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`
`GutUptakeofGlutamine(_uM) E
`
`
`
`151
`
`151
`
`

`
`W0 2006l056'?94
`
`PC TIC B2005!!! 04539
`
`14:" 1 5
`
`Figure 27
`
`1 800
`
`1500
`
`‘I20
`
`
`Ornithine
`
`
`Phenylbutyrate
`Ornithine-
`
`Placebo
`
`
`
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`900
`
`sun
`
`300
`
`D
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`Time (hr)
`
`Figure 28
`
`
`
`Ornithine(pM)
`
`
`
`
`
`ArterialGlutamine(M1)
`
`600
`
`400
`
`200
`
`Placebo
`Omithine
`
`Phenylbutyrate
`Ornithine—
`
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`152
`
`152
`
`

`
`W0 200 6J'l)56 794
`
`PC TIC B2005r'00-I-539
`
`153' 15
`
`Figure 29
`
`2500-‘
`
`2000“
`
`
`
`
`
`1 500-
`
`1000"
`
`50%
`
`(pm) ArterialGlycine
`
`—1-- Placebo
`
`—I— Ornithine
`
`-A~ Phenylbutyrate
`
`—o— Ornilhine-
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`flg&Ml
`
`%differenceinbrainwater
`
`_-
`Ornithlne -
`.
`Pm‘-‘flY'bUtY|'flt9
`-
`'
`Ornithine
`
`\
`
`relativetocontrol
`
`Phenylbutyrate
`
`153
`
`153
`
`

`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
`A. CLASSIFICATION OF UBJECT MATIEFI
`A61P1 16
`A61K31/192
`
`A61K31/198
`
`Inter
`tai application No
`PC” ‘$2005/004539
`
`According to international Patent Classification (I530) orto both national classification and IF-‘C
`
`a HELDSSEAHCHED
`Minimum documentation searched (oiassiiication system followed by clasailicalicn symbols)
`A61K A61?
`
`'
`
`Documentation searched other than minimum documentation to the extent that such documents are included In the Fields searched
`
`Electronic data base consulted during the tntemattonal search (name of data base and. where practical, search terms used)
`
`EPO-Internai, CHEM ABS Data, NPI Data
`
`'3. DOCUMENTS CONSIDEFIED TO BE RELEVANT
`
`Category‘
`
`Citation of document, with indication. where approprlale, ofthe relevant passages
`
`Fieievani to claim No.
`
`(BURZYNSKI STANISLAW R)
`Us 2005/182064 Al
`18 August 2005 (2005-08-18)
`paragraph ‘U056!
`ciaims
`
`US 4 228 099 A CWALSER ET AL)
`14 October 1930 (1980-10-14)
`abstract
`
`DATABASE NPI
`Section Ch, Meek 200331
`Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB;
`Ciass B05, AN 2003-314385
`XP002364873
`
`& CN 1 383 815 A (LIU M)
`11 December 2002 (2002-12-11)
`abstract
`
`'
`
`Further documents are listed in the continuation of Box C.
`‘l
`'
`f
`1
`cl
`1
`:
`Spec” cmegoneso med acumen S
`'A' document defining the general state orttie art wttiott is not
`considered to be 01 particular relevance
`‘E’ earlier document but published on or after the international
`"mg dam
`'L' document which may throw doubts on priority ciatrnts) or
`which is cited to establish the publication date or another
`or (as specmau:
`‘0‘ document reterrtng to an oral disclosure. use. exhibition or
`other means
`'P" document published prior to the International
`later than the priority date claimed
`Date of the actual completion oftlte inlemational search
`
`filing dole out
`
`See potent family annex.
`
`.
`
`'T‘ later document published attertire intemationai filing date
`gi::éi?;flgn%:tr:‘:'::é 11?; I3rfi%?g|1gIa‘:jm;2:, ififlgabflfig $1‘:
`“wanna”
`.x. document of pamcmar relevance; me claimed invention
`cannot be considered novel or cannot be considered to
`irwotve an inventhre step when the document is taken alone
`.
`.
`Y “£2223?=tt°;3::c::::,::*?,r:.i3:-gitflztrrs LT'r§S‘1lIE2r.
`document is combined with one or more other such docu-
`meow. such combination being obvious to a person skilled
`In "'9 3"-
`'8.’ document member of the same patent family
`Date or mailing of the lntematlonal search report
`
`27 January 2006
`Name and mailing address of the ISA!‘
`European Patent Office. FEEL 581 B Patettiiean 2
`NL - 2280 HV Fiijawiik
`E::f:3;:3§’3,°:fafs°:PeT“' 3‘ 65‘ °"° ""
`
`03/02/2006
`Authorized oiiicer
`
`skafii demand, c
`
`154
`
`154
`
`

`
`H§TEFUWATK)NA1.SEAJH3HIREPCMQT
`
`Inter
`
`nal application No
`
`PCn;uB2UU5/004539
`
`Clcontinuationi.
`
`DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED TO BE RELEVANT
`
`Category‘
`
`Cilailon of document. with Indication. where appropriate. of the relevant passages
`
`Flelevant to claim No.
`
`(SUMMAR MARSHALL L ET
`us 2004/229948 Al
`AL) 18 November 2004 (2004-11-18)
`the M1019 document
`
`155
`
`155
`
`

`
`
`
`ationai application No.
`PCT/932005/004539
`
`iNTEFtNATt0NAL SEARCH REPORT
`
`Box No. It Observations where certain claims were tound unsearchable (continuation or item 2 of first sheet)
`
`This international search report has not been established in respect of certain claims under Article 1?'{2)la) for the iollowing reasons:
`
`
`
`
`Claims Nos.:
`because they relate to subject matter not required to be searched by this Authority, namely:
`
`Although claims 25-27 are directed to a method of treatment of the
`human/animal body,
`the Search has been carried out and based on the alleged
`effects of the compound/composition.
`
`
`
`
`2. D Claims Nos.:
`because they relate to parts of the international applica

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket