throbber
FURTHER
`
`ON THE DETOXICATION
`STUDIES
`PHENYLACETIC
`ACID
`
`OF
`
`BY ANTHONY
`
`M.
`
`W. POWER,
`
`AND
`
`FRANCIS
`AMBROSE,
`CARL
`P. SHERWIN
`the Chemical Research Laboratory,
`Fordham University, New York)
`
`(From
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on February 10, 2016
`
`(Received
`
`for
`
`publication,
`
`May
`
`4, 1933)
`
`In the previous work done on the detoxication of phenylacetic
`acid in t.his laboratory, we have never been able to account for
`more than half of it as the glutamine conjugate in the human
`urine. We ascribed this to either (a) conjugation with other
`substances besides glutamine, (b) an incomplete detoxication, or
`(c) the met.hods of analysis.
`
`Conjugation
`
`with Glucuronic
`
`Acid
`
`Quick (1) believed t,hat glucuronic acid may arise not from
`glucose itself, but from glycogen and sugar-forming amino acids
`In his experi-
`when glucuronic acid is needed for detoxicat,ion.
`ments depancreatized dogs were able to produce glucuronic acid
`the same as normal dogs, but under these conditions glucuronic
`acid is produced at the expense of glucose which would otherwise
`appear in the urine.
`The ratio between the conjugation of benzoic acid with glu-
`curonic acid and glycine in the case of animals was also deter-
`mined by Quick (2). The results show that
`the amount com-
`bined with glucuronic acid in these cases was by far larger than
`had previously been suspected.
`Brakefield (3) finds only traces of or no glucuronic acid after
`feeding benzoic acid to humans while Quick (4) under the same
`conditions reports 11 per cent conjugation. However, when
`phenylacetic acid is fed to dogs (a),
`it is detoxicated in a manner
`similar to benzoic acid.
`
`669
`
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`Owner Ex. 2027
`Par Pharm. v. Horizon
`IPR2015-01117,-01127
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on February 10, 2016
`
`670
`
`Detoxication
`
`of Phenylacetic Acid
`
`Incomplete Detoxication
`subjects were
`fed phenylacetic
`acid; the urine was acidi-
`Human
`fied and extracted
`with
`various
`organic
`solvents,
`but no
`free
`phcnylacetic
`acid was
`found.
`to determine
`~~~e~irne~,t
`I-The
`object of our experiment, was
`to what extent,
`if any, glucuronic
`acid is employed by the human
`
`Rate of Glucuronic
`
`Acid
`
`TABLE
`Excretion
`of Phenylacetic
`
`I
`after
`
`Feeding
`Acid
`
`Varying
`
`Phenylacetic
`aid
`eliminated
`
`Amounts
`-
`
`8 Phenylacetio
`acid eliminated
`
`Date
`
`Date
`
`l-4
`4, 5
`
`Nov.
`“
`Dec.
`Jan.
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`‘I
`“
`“
`
`19, 23
`30, Dec.
`5-8,
`Jan.
`6, 7, 10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`16
`17
`18
`20
`21
`23
`25
`26
`
`gm.
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`5
`6
`6
`6
`7
`7
`
`-
`
`93.0
`97.5
`98.0
`97.9
`97.0
`98.2
`98.5
`98.4
`98.2
`98.4
`98.4
`98.2
`98.6
`97.9
`98.9
`99.0
`
`i
`
`0.0 0.0
`
`1.0
`4.0
`4.9
`4.6
`3.5
`6.4
`7.1
`4.9
`4.9
`5.6
`5.7
`6.6
`5.7
`5.4
`
`Jan.
`“
`Feb.
`(‘
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`“
`
`27
`30
`1
`2
`3
`6
`8
`9
`10
`11
`13
`15
`16
`17
`23
`24
`
`CJm.
`7
`8
`8
`8
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`8
`8
`7
`7
`6
`6
`
`99.1
`99.1
`98.4
`97.4
`98.8
`98.7
`99.5
`98.4
`98.9
`99.0
`98.5
`98.5
`98.5
`98.0
`98.7
`99.3
`
`4.5
`6.8
`5.7
`5.0
`5.3
`5.2
`5.3
`5.3
`5.2
`5.6
`5.6
`5.2
`5.1
`5.5
`6.5
`6.8
`
`of phenylacetic
`for detoxication
`subject
`take place.
`under which
`this might
`to human sub-
`fed
`acid was
`phenylacetic
`In these experiments
`in increasing daily doses in order
`to place
`jects as the sodium salt
`a continual
`and ever
`increasing
`strain on the defense mechanism
`of the body,
`in the hope
`that
`in this way we might overtax
`the
`
`the conditions
`
`acid and
`
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`Owner Ex. 2027
`Par Pharm. v. Horizon
`IPR2015-01117,-01127
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on February 10, 2016
`
`Ambrose, Power, and Sherwin
`
`671
`
`to a
`to produce glutamine and force it to resort
`power of the body
`glucuronic
`acid detoxication.
`Table
`I shows
`the results obtained.
`Experiment
`,%-Small
`doses of phenylacetic
`acid, 3 gm ., were
`fed
`to thirty-four
`normal
`students
`and
`the urine was
`collected
`hourly over a period of 5 hours.
`It was
`thought
`that
`the small
`dose might be detoxicated
`by means of glucuronic
`acid and if so
`we wished
`to ascertain
`the rate at which
`this combination
`took
`place.
`It seemed quite possible
`to us
`that
`small amounts
`of
`phenylacetic
`acid excreted during
`the early stage of detoxication
`
`Glucuronic
`5 gm. were
`given
`
`Acid
`every
`
`Excretion
`8 hours,
`
`TABLE
`after
`a total
`
`II
`Acid
`Phenylacetic
`Feeding
`of 45 gm.
`in 72 hours.
`
`Time
`
`of
`
`feeding
`
`Phenylaoetio
`
`acid
`-
`
`9 a.m.
`5 p.m.
`12
`“
`9 a.m.
`5 p.m.
`12
`“
`9 a.m.
`5 p.m.
`12
`“
`
`Total
`
`gm.
`1.84
`4.74
`4.33
`2.68
`3.40
`3.89
`3.34
`4.36
`6.10
`
`Total................
`
`34.68
`
`I
`
`eliminated
`
`Combined
`
`wivii
`
`glucuronio
`
`gm.
`0.0
`0.807
`0.252
`0.602
`1.515
`0.384
`0.301
`1.566
`0.231
`
`5.658
`
`79.29
`cent
`per
`12.40 per
`
`per
`of
`cent
`
`acid
`phenylacetic
`total
`the
`of
`cent
`conjugated
`eliminated
`was
`total
`the
`of the
`total
`fed was conjugated
`with
`
`fed was
`with
`glucuronic
`
`recovered.
`glucuronic
`acid.
`
`16.00
`acid.
`
`large volumes of urine were
`when
`might have been overlooked,
`collected over a period of 24 hours.
`The results
`of the experi-
`ment, however, may be considered
`entirely negative
`as five sub-
`jects of the thirty-four
`showed
`less than 1 per cent of glucuronic
`acid conjugation
`at one time or another, and the others
`showed
`less or none at all.
`the
`in much
`was undert,aken
`experiment
`Experiment S-This
`same fashion, except, that
`the subject was
`fed 5 gm. of phenyl-
`acetic acid every 8 hours
`for a period of 72 hours, a total
`feeding of
`
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`Owner Ex. 2027
`Par Pharm. v. Horizon
`IPR2015-01117,-01127
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on February 10, 2016
`
`672
`
`Detoxication
`
`of Phenylacetic Acid
`
`acid
`
`acid and phenylacetic
`45 gm., and the amount of glucuronic
`(See Table
`II.)
`determined at the end of each 8 hour period.
`Methods-Phenylacetylglutamine
`was prepared
`by
`the usual
`method
`(5).
`Total phenylacetic
`acid was determined
`by
`the
`method of Kingsbury
`and Swanson
`(6) as used by
`them
`for
`the
`determination
`of total benzoic acid, except
`that,
`instead of using
`quant.ities
`of urine as described
`in their method,
`the quantity
`varied
`inversely with
`the amount of phenylacetic
`acid ingested.
`Glucuronic
`acid was determined
`by
`its
`reducing
`power
`towards
`Somogyi’s
`reagent
`(7).
`acid plays a
`From
`this work
`it is clearly seen that glucuronic
`acid
`in the
`rather
`small
`role
`in the detoxication
`of phenylacetic
`human as compared with
`similar work
`on animals except when
`excessive
`amounts
`are
`ingested.
`Thus Quick
`(2) showed
`t.hat
`phenylacetic
`acid
`is excreted by
`the dog, conjugated with
`glu-
`curonic acid to the extent of about 34 per cent,
`the other 66 per
`cent appearing as the glycine conjugate.
`Table I shows
`that after
`repeated
`ingestions of phenylacetic
`acid at 24 hour
`intervals
`the
`body
`is still capable of furnishing
`glutamine
`for detoxication
`pur-
`poses and
`that
`the amount of glucuronic
`acid produced
`rarely
`exceeds a 5 per cent conjugation.
`However,
`the same or smaller doses, but ingested at 8 hour inter-
`vals,
`required
`considerable
`amounts of this substance,
`as Experi-
`ment 3 (Ta,ble
`II)
`shows,
`but we were unable
`to complete
`the
`series as the subject became nauseated on account, of t,he repeated
`ingestions.
`During
`the second period we obtained
`greater glu-
`curonic acid conjugation,
`indicating
`the body’s
`inability
`to synthe-
`size sufficient glutamine,
`thus
`resorting
`to glucuronic
`acid conju-
`gation.
`Phenylacetic
`acid retention was also observed.
`
`of Phenylacetylglutamine
`Methods of Analysis
`acid in the
`Folin and Flanders
`(8) have noticed
`that hippuric
`on a water
`urine
`is appreciably
`hydrolyzed
`while evaporating
`which
`is
`bath, so it is to be expected
`that phenylacetylglutamine,
`extent.
`quite unstable, would also be destroyed
`to a considerable
`In a series of four experiments,
`assuming
`that all the phenylacetic
`acid ingested should appear as a glutamine
`conjugate, an average
`of 51 per cent of phenylacetylglutamine
`was
`recovered
`from
`the
`urine.
`To check
`this by a recovery
`experiment,,
`16.4 gm. of
`
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`Owner Ex. 2027
`Par Pharm. v. Horizon
`IPR2015-01117,-01127
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on February 10, 2016
`
`Ambrose, Power, and Sherwin
`
`in 2 liters of normal urine
`were dissolved
`phenylacetylglut,amine
`treated
`in the usual way
`(5). Only 47.4 per
`and the urine was
`cent of the original amount was
`recovered.
`Therefore,
`it seems
`t,hat the large amount of phenylacetylglutamine
`unaccounted
`for
`is not to be ascribed
`to any extensive
`conjugation with any other
`substances,
`but rather
`to t’he losses inherent
`in the evaporation,
`as
`the extraction
`itself
`seems
`to give quantitative
`removal
`of the
`phenylacetylglutamine
`once it is in the apparatus.
`In connection with
`this work we were able to get an approxi-
`mate estimate
`of the
`time
`required
`for
`the body
`to detoxicate
`phenylacetic
`acid.
`A total of 20 gm. (in four portions)
`was
`in-
`gested by two
`subjects, each taking 5 gm. in two doses 12 hours
`apart ; 12 hour volumes of the urine, each including both night and
`day specimens, were evaporated
`and extracted;
`and the
`first 12
`hour sample was compared with
`the following
`12 hour sample.
`It
`was
`found
`that
`in the urine excreted
`during
`the
`first 12 hours
`following
`ingestion
`of the acid, 53.8 per cent of the
`theoretical
`phenylacetylglutamine
`was
`recovered,
`and in the second 12 hour
`period only 1.4 per cent.
`Thus over 95 per cent of the phenyl-
`acetic acid is taken care of by the body during
`the first 12 hours
`and less than 5 per cent remains
`to be detoxicated
`in the second 12
`hours.
`Hence, whether
`we approach
`this detoxication
`problem
`from
`the glutamine
`conjugate or from
`that of glucuronic
`acid, the
`ratio of one to the other
`is very nearly
`the same, that
`is about 18: 1.
`In aqueous solution, pure phenylacetylglutamine
`shows a fairly
`strong
`acidity.
`Its hydrogen
`ion concentration,
`measured
`by
`indicators
`and checked approximately
`electrometrically,
`for 0.1 N
`solution
`is 6.9 X 10-3, corresponding
`to an ionization
`of about
`7 per cent, and for 0.01 N solution, 2.6 X 10-3, corresponding
`to an
`ionization of about 25 per cent.
`Its warm 0.1 N solution decom-
`poses
`the carbonates
`of alkalies and alkaline earths, also those of
`lead and copper.
`Its
`salts
`thus
`far studied’ are all soluble
`in
`water, making
`separation
`by precipitation
`thus
`far
`impossible.
`The
`insolubility
`of the barium
`salt
`in absolute alcohol
`(0.87 gm.
`per liter)
`is used to separate
`it from urea; the presence of 5 per cent
`of water
`in the alcohol raises
`its solubility
`over 400 per cent.
`in
`Decomposition
`by Evaporation-Two
`samples were dissolved
`in
`25 cc. of water
`in small Kjeldahl
`flasks which were
`immersed
`boiling water and a slow
`current
`of air passed
`through
`(over 2%
`
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`Owner Ex. 2027
`Par Pharm. v. Horizon
`IPR2015-01117,-01127
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on February 10, 2016
`
`674
`
`Detoxication
`
`of Phenylacetic Acid
`
`and run
`hours),
`were as follows:
`
`into hydrochloric
`
`acid 0.5024 N.
`
`The
`
`results
`
`Substance
`
`om.
`0.1632
`0.1625
`
`Acid
`
`neutralized
`
`cc.
`0.26
`0.32
`
`Decomposition
`per cent
`21.1
`26.1
`
`that
`is based on t,he assumption
`decomposition
`This percentage
`the phenylacetylglutamine
`lost 1 molecule of ammonia and was
`converted
`into phenylacetylglutamic
`acid.
`A similar experiment
`run at 60” showed only one-fourth
`as much decomposition.
`with
`Decomposition
`of Phenylacetylglutamine
`on Evaporation
`in one
`Alkaline Solutions-Experiments
`were conducted as above;
`case 50 cc. of saturated
`barium hydroxide
`solution were
`taken and
`boiled off slowly during 1 hour
`into standard
`acid kept
`in an ice
`bath;
`in the other case N KOH
`solution was used.
`The results
`were as follows:
`
`Substance
`
`om.
`0.2002
`0.2015
`
`I
`
`Acid
`
`neutralized
`
`I
`
`Decomposition
`
`cc.
`(0.0894
`(0.1014N)
`
`N)
`
`8.80
`7.48
`
`per cent
`104.0
`99.5
`
`caused 71
`for 15 minutes
`solution
`Boiling with barium hydroxide
`per cent decomposition,
`and even in the cold there
`is a slight
`loss
`of ammonia on standing.
`by Means of Its Amino
`Determination
`of Phenylacetylglutamine
`Nitrogen-Small
`samples
`of phenylacetylglutamine
`(0.1266 gm.
`in each case) were boiled 2 hours under a reflux with 10 cc. of 62
`per cent sulfuric
`acid.
`The mixture was cooled, diluted, made
`alkaline with sodium hydroxide,
`and boiled until all the ammonia
`was
`liberated,
`then evaporated
`to dryness on the steam bath, and
`the residue dried
`in a vacuum
`oven overnight
`at 55-60”.
`The
`dry residue was ground up and extracted wit,h 95 per cent alcohol
`made faintly acid with
`sulfuric
`acid.
`This alcoholic solution was
`concentrated
`to small volume,
`run
`into
`the Van Slyke apparatus,
`and the amino nitrogen
`determined,
`after 10 minutes
`shaking.
`
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`Owner Ex. 2027
`Par Pharm. v. Horizon
`IPR2015-01117,-01127
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on February 10, 2016
`
`Ambrose, Power, and Sherwin
`
`675
`
`1 cc. of Nz = 0.0118 gm. of phenylacetylglutamine.
`were as follows:
`
`The results
`
`N*
`cc.
`10.52
`10.12
`11.79
`11.70
`and
`
`pressure
`
`Yield
`per cent
`98.0
`94.4
`109.9
`109.0
`corrected
`for blank.
`
`* Normal
`
`temperature
`
`figures give an average yield of 102.8 per cent. Using
`These
`phenylacetylglutamine
`without
`previous hydrolysis,
`we observed
`on two
`samples 2.17 and 3.20 per cent decomposition,
`average
`2.69 per cent, after 10 minutes shaking.
`
`SUMMARY
`acid
`of phenylacetic
`incomplete
`conjugation
`1. The apparently
`in
`it
`is
`ingested
`by
`the human
`subject
`with
`glutamine when
`moderate doses may best be ascribed
`to the hydrolysis
`of phenyl-
`acetylglutamine
`when
`the urine containing
`it is evaporated
`on the
`water bath.
`in moder-
`acid ingested
`2. About 95 per cent of the phenylacetic
`glutamine,
`ate doses by
`the human
`subject
`is detoxicated with
`inges-
`acid. On continued
`and about 5 per cent with glucuronic
`tion the ratio
`is shifted
`in favor of the latter.
`3. Some properties
`of phenylacetylglutamine
`
`are enumerated.
`
`BIBLIOGRAPHY
`
`physiological
`
`chemistry,
`
`1. Quick,
`(1926).
`70,59,397
`Chem.,
`A. J., J. Biol.
`(1928).
`77,581
`Chem.,
`A. J., J. Biol.
`2. Quick,
`(1927).
`74, 783
`3. Brakefield,
`J. L.,
`J. Biol.
`Chem.,
`4. Quick,
`A. J., J. Biol.
`Chem.,
`92, 65
`(1931).
`5. Hawk,
`P. B.,
`and
`Bergeim,
`O.,
`Practical
`Philadelphia,
`9th
`edition,
`304
`(1926).
`J. Biol.
`Kingsbury,
`F. B., and Swanson,
`W. W.,
`Somogyi,
`J. BioZ. Chem.,
`70, 599
`(1926).
`M.,
`Folin,
`O., and Flanders,
`F. F., J. BioZ. Chem.,
`
`6.
`7.
`8.
`
`Chem.,
`
`48, 13 (1921).
`
`11,257
`
`(1912).
`
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`Owner Ex. 2027
`Par Pharm. v. Horizon
`IPR2015-01117,-01127
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://www.jbc.org/
`
` by guest on February 10, 2016
`
`FURTHER STUDIES ON THE
`DETOXICATION OF PHENYLACETIC
`ACID
`Anthony M. Ambrose, Francis W. Power and
`Carl P. Sherwin
`1933, 101:669-675.
`
`J. Biol. Chem.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Access the most updated version of this article at
`
` http://www.jbc.org/content/101/3/669.citation
`
`
`
`Alerts:
`When this article is cited
`•(cid:160)
`
` When a correction for this article is posted
`•(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`Click here
`alerts
`
` to choose from all of JBC's e-mail
`
`This article cites 0 references, 0 of which can be
`accessed free at
`http://www.jbc.org/content/101/3/669.citation.full.h
`
`tml#ref-list-1
`(cid:160)
`
`
`Page 8 of 8
`
`Owner Ex. 2027
`Par Pharm. v. Horizon
`IPR2015-01117,-01127
`
`(cid:160)
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket