throbber
Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 66 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:4526
`
`Ryan E. Hatch (SBN 235577)
`rhatch@linerlaw.com
`Jason L. Haas (SBN 217290)
`jhaas@linerlaw.com
`LINER LLP
`1100 Glendon Avenue, 14th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90024.3518
`Telephone: (310) 500-3500
`Facsimile:
`(310) 500-3501
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Signal IP, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`SIGNAL IP, INC., a California
`corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO.,
`INC., a California corporation;
`HONDA OF AMERICA MRG, INC.,
`an Ohio corporation,
`Defendants.
`
`AND RELATED CASES
`
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`(Related to 2:14-cv-02962-JAK
`(JEMx); CV14-00497-JAK (JEMx);
`8:14-cv-00491-JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-
`02963 JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-02457-
`JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-03111-JAK
`(JEMx); LA CV14-03109 JAK (JEMx);
`2:14-cv-03107-JAK (JEMx);)
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR
`ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL
`JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`The Hon. John A. Kronstadt
`Trial Date:
`TBD
`
`Plaintiff Signal IP, Inc., (“Plaintiff” or “Signal”) and defendants American Honda
`Motor Co., Inc. and Honda of America Mfg., Inc. (collectively “Honda”), Nissan North
`America, Inc. (“Nissan”), Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. (“Mitsubishi”),
`Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (“Mazda”), Subaru of America, Inc. (“Subaru”), Kia
`Motors America, Inc. (“KMA”), BMW of North America, LLC (“BMWNA”),
`Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“Mercedes”), and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and
`Bentley Motors, Inc. (together, “Volkswagen/Bentley”) (collectively, “Defendants”)
`Volkswagen v. Signal IP IPR2015-01116
`Signal IP Ex. 2002
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`41406.001-2343734
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 66 Filed 05/20/15 Page 2 of 6 Page ID #:4527
`
`hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:
`1.
`In 2014, Plaintiff filed suit against Mercedes, Subaru, KMA, Nissan,
`Volkswagen/Bentley, BMWNA, and Honda alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No.
`6,775,601 (“the ’601 patent”).
`2.
`In 2014, Plaintiff filed suit against Mercedes, Mazda, Subaru, KMA,
`Nissan, Mitsubishi, Volkswagen/Bentley, BMWNA, and Honda alleging infringement
`of U.S. Patent No. 6,012,007 (“the ’007 patent”)
`3.
`In 2014, Plaintiff filed suit against Mazda, KMA, Nissan, Mitsubishi,
`Volkswagen/Bentley, BMWNA, and Honda alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No.
`5,732,375 (“the ’375 patent”).
`4.
`Plaintiff asserted that certain Defendants infringed claims 8, 9, 10, 11, 13,
`15, and 17 of the ‘601 patent; claims 1 and 7 of the ’375 patent; and claims 1, 8, 9, 17,
`18, 19, 20, 21, and 22 of the ’007 patent (collectively, the “Asserted Claims”).
`5.
`Defendants denied Plaintiff’s claims of infringement and asserted various
`affirmative defenses or counterclaims, including that the Asserted Claims were invalid
`under 35 U.S.C. § 112.
`6.
`On April 17, 2015, the Court issued its claim construction order (Docket
`No. 77) holding, inter alia, that (i) certain terms in claims 8, 15, and 17 of the ’601
`patent are indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 2; (ii) certain terms in claims 1,
`17, and 20 of the ’007 patent are indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 2; and (iii)
`a term in claim 1 of the ’375 patent is indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 2.
`7.
`In light of the Court’s claim construction order, Plaintiff and Defendants
`stipulate to entry of a partial final judgment that the following claims are invalid due to
`indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 2: (i) claims 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, and 17
`of the ‘601 patent; (ii) claims 1 and 7 of the ’375 patent; and (iii) claims 1, 8, 9, 17, 18,
`19, and 20 of the ’007 patent.
`8.
`Plaintiff and Defendants reserve all appellate rights, including, but not
`limited to, the right to appeal the Court’s April 17, 2015 claim construction order to the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.001-2343734
`
`1
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 66 Filed 05/20/15 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:4528
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Plaintiff reserves all rights as to
`claims not addressed by the Court’s claim construction order, or any new claims that
`may be issued by the United States Patent Office.
`9.
`A partial final judgment reflecting the parties’ stipulation is submitted
`herewith.
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`LINER LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Ryan E. Hatch
`Ryan E. Hatch
`Jason L. Haas
`Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGNAL IP, INC.
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Ralph A. Phillips
`Ralph A. Phillips (Pro Hac Vice)
`Ahmed J. Davis (Pro Hac Vice)
`Attorneys for Defendants
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC:
`and HONDA OF AMERICA MFG., INC.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.001-2343734
`
`2
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 66 Filed 05/20/15 Page 4 of 6 Page ID #:4529
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Patrick A. Lujin
`Patrick A. Lujin
`B. Trent Webb
`Richard D. Eiszner
`Gabriel S. Spooner
`Douglas W. Robinson
`Jamie H. Kitano
`Attorneys for Defendant NISSAN NORTH
`AMERICA, INC.
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`CHRISTA & JACKSON
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Laura K. Christa
`Laura K. Christa
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH
`AMERICA, INC.
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`DLA PIPER, LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Matthew D. Satchwell
`Matthew D. Satchwell
`Clive McClintock
`Attorneys for MAZDA MOTOR OF
`AMERICA, INC. and SUBARU OF
`AMERICA, INC.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.001-2343734
`
`3
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 66 Filed 05/20/15 Page 5 of 6 Page ID #:4530
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Stephen Shahida
`Stephen Shahida
`Attorneys for Defendant
`KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC.
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`DLA PIPER LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Joseph P. Lavelle
`Joseph P. Lavelle
`Andrew N. Stein
`Clive McClintock
`Attorneys for BMW of North America, LLC
`
`Dated: May 2020, 2015
`
`GONZALEZ SAGGIO & HARLAN LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Don A. Hernandez
`Don A. Hernandez
`Christina D. Hernandez
`
`FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER &
`JACOBSON LLP
`Scott W. Doyle (pro hac vice)
`Jonathan DeFosse (pro hac vice)
`Attorneys for Defendant Mercedes-Benz
`USA, LLC
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.001-2343734
`
`4
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 66 Filed 05/20/15 Page 6 of 6 Page ID #:4531
`
`Dated: May 2020, 2015
`
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Ryan K. Yagura
`Ryan K. Yagura
`Kevin Murray
`
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`Michael J. Lennon (pro hac vice)
`Michael N. Zachary
`Susan A. Smith
`Attorneys for Defendant VOLKSWAGEN
`GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. and
`BENTLEY MOTORS, INC.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.001-2343734
`
`5
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket