throbber
EXHIBIT 1020
`
`‘ U.S. PATENT NO. 5,762,871 TO NEYER
`
`
`
`Infopié Ex. 1020 pg. 1
`
`

`

`H||||||l||||||||||||l||l|lIlllHlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllliiV
`
`USOOS76287 1A
`
`United States Patent
`
`[191
`
`Neyer
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`5,762,871
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Jun. 9, 1998
`
`[54] MULTI-LAYER TEST DEVICE FOR
`ANALYZING THE CONCENTRATION OF
`ANALYTE IN A BLOOD SAMPLE
`
`[75]
`
`Inventor: Gebhard Neyer. Los Angeles. Calif.
`
`[73] Assignee: LXN Corp.. San Diego. Calif.
`
`[21] App]. No.: 892,697
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Jul. 15, 1997
`
`Related US. Application Data
`
`[62] Division of Ser. No. 418,523, Apr. 7, 1995, Pat. No. 5,725,
`774.
`
`[51]
`
`Int. Cl.6 .......................... G01N 33/50; GOIN 33/52;
`C12Q 1/00; C12Q 1/54
`............................ 422/57; 210/483; 210/488;
`[52] US. Cl.
`210/489; 210/490; 210/496; 210/503; 210/504;
`210/505; 210/506; 210/508; 422/55; 422/56;
`422/60; 422/101; 436/169; 436/170
`[58] Field of Search ..................................... 210/483. 488.
`210/489. 490. 496. 503. 504. 505. 506.
`508; 422/55. 56. S7. 60. 73. 101. 102; 436/16.
`69. 169. 170. 177. 178; 530/412. 415
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`1/1971 Fetter ........................................ 23/230
`3,552,925
`1/1971 Fetter .......
`23/253
`3,552,928
`
`9/1975 Greenspan
`...... 195/1
`3,902,964
`3/1981 Kondo el al.
`.
`4,256,693
`
`..
`4,477,575 10/1984 Vogel et a1.
`9/1985 Chen ............
`4.543.338
`
`7/1987 Rapkill et 31.
`4,678,757'
`
`4,933,092
`6/1990 Aunet a].
`.
`5,064,541
`11/1991 Ieng et al.
`
`1/1992 Nitadoti e! a].
`5,084,173
`
`5,166,051
`........................... '435/7.1
`11/1992 Killeen et a].
`435/792
`5,169,757
`1271992 Yamazaki et a1.
`..
`
`436/169
`5,169,787 1211992 Knappe eta].
`
`210/767
`2/1993 Baumgardner et al
`5,186,843
`435fl.1
`
`5/1993 Maddox ..............
`5,212,060
`. 435/14
`5,306,623
`4/1994 Kiser et al.
`.
`...... 435/10
`5,366,868
`11/1994 Sakamoto
`
`..
`5,397,479
`3/1995 Kass et a1.
`210/728
`
`.....
`5.423.989
`6/1995 Alla: cl al.
`210/650
`................................ 436/87
`5,470,752
`11/1995 Burd et a1.
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2104976
`0 194 502
`O 436 897
`
`3/1994 Canada .
`.
`9/1986 European Pat. OE.
`.
`7/1991 , European Pat. Ofi.
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Dialog Database Abstract of EPA 0 194 502 to Limbach and
`Helger. EPA published Sep. 17. 1986.
`
`Primary Examiner—John Kim
`Anomey, Agent, or Firm—Campbell & Flores LLP
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`The present invention relates to a method and to a device for
`separating plasma from whole blood. The method and
`device utilize a permeable mmglass fiber matrix containing
`a polyol which is capable of clumping red blood cells. The
`matrix. in the absence of such a polyol, would otherwise be
`porous to red blood cells. The polyol-containing matrix has
`a first surface and a second surface such that a whole blood
`sample which is applied to the first surface flows direction-
`ally toward the second surface. Plasma separated from
`whole blood becomes available at the second surface of the
`matrix and can be tested for the presence of a particular
`analyte. such as glucose or fructosamine. as provided by
`multl-layer test devices of the present invention.
`
`1 3 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet
`
`.17
`
`
`
`IS
`
`18
`
`Infopia Ex. 1020 pg. 2
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jun. 9, 1998
`
`5,762,871
`
`
`
`l6
`
`18
`
`
`

`
`FIG.2
`
`Infopia Ex. 1020 pg. 3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`5.762.871
`
`1
`MULTI-LAYER TEST DEVICE FOR
`ANALYZING THE CONCENTRATION OF
`ANALYTE IN A BLOOD SAMPLE
`
`This application is a divisional of application Ser. No.
`‘ 08/418523. filed Apr. 7. 1995. U.S. Pat. No. 5.725.774.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`The present invention relates generally to the chemical
`analysis of analytes present in whole blood and more
`specifically.
`to a method and to a device for separating
`plasma or serum from whole blood. thus providing a con-
`venient and accurate means for such chemical analysis.
`2. Background Information
`Presently. numerous test devices are available for the
`analysis of body fluids in order to determine the presence or
`concentration of a particular analyte. For example. tests are
`available for detecting glucose.
`fructosamine. albumin.
`calcium. urea. uric acid. bilirubin. cholesterol. and other
`soluble analytes present in whole blood or the fluid part of
`blood. namely the plasma or serum. after whole blood has
`been separated.
`Many of these test devices utilize chromogenic or other
`visual responses to indicate the presence or absence. or the
`concentration. of an analyte being detected. Cellular com-
`ponents of whole blood. and in particular the redblood cells.
`have a deep red color which substantially interferes with
`chromogenic or other visual tests. Therefore. the highly-
`colored red blood cells as well as other interfering sub-
`stances present in blood including hemoglobin and white
`blood cells are separated from the plasma or serum before a
`blood sample is assayed for a particular analyte.
`Conventionally. the plasma or serum is separated from the
`cellular material of whole blood by centrifugan'ou. The
`cellular material collects at the bottom of the centrifuge tube
`and the supernatant plasma or serum is decanted and tested
`for a particular analyte. Centrifugation. however. is time
`consuming. involves extra manipulative steps and requires
`equipment that is generally not present outside of the clinical
`laboratory. Thus. reliance on eenuifugation makes field
`testing. such as testing at the doctor’s office or at the
`patient’s home. difficult.
`‘
`Certain methods other than centrifugation have been
`developed to separate the cellular components of whole
`blood from plasma or serum. Some of the earlier methods.
`such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 4.543.338 to Chen.
`involve the use of a carrier membrane impregnated with a
`test reagent and coated with a semipermeable membrane.
`The semipermeable membrane effectively acts as a means
`for filtering out cells or
`large molecules. such as
`hemoglobin. but allows the passage of smaller molecules
`and ions which then contact the testing reagents impregnated
`in the bibulous matrix. These methods. however. typically
`require an extra manipulative step. such as rinsing with
`water or wiping off the test device so as to remove cellular
`material retained on the semipermeable membrane. Such
`techniques can be cumbersome and laborious. Moreover. if
`the red blood cells. are not completely removed or rinsed
`from the semipermeable barrier.
`terference with the assay
`remains a problem.
`Another method for separating whole blood is described
`in U.S. Pat. No. 4.477.575 to Vogel et al. which describes
`separating plasma or serum from whole blood using a layer
`of glass fibers having a defined average diameter and
`
`2
`in U.S. Pat No.
`density. As well. Baumgardner et al.
`5.186.843 describe the use of glass fibers in a single sepa-
`ration layer. Blood separation devices utilizing glass fiber
`filters. however. tend to separate serum at a relatively slow
`speed and tend to retain significant quantities of serum or
`plasma in the interstices of the glass fiber matrix.
`Alternative approaches to blood separation involve incor-
`porating agglutinating reagents or other separation reagents
`in a matrix. For example. Aunet et al. in U.S. Pat. No.
`4.933.092. Daubney et al.
`in published Canadian Patent
`Application No. 2.104.976. and Limbach in European Patent
`Application 0 194 502 all describe the use of polymeric
`agglutinating agents. such as cationic polymers. which. for
`example. in Daubney and in Limbach are combined with
`additional agglutinating agents. such as lectins. As well.
`Barkes et al. in European Patent Application No. 0 436 897.
`describe the use of lectins and thrombin incorporated into a
`suitable carrier matrix. However. such matrices incorporated
`with these types of agglutinating agents exhibit problems
`similar to those associated with glass fiber matrices. For
`example. the separation may occur at a relatively slow speed
`and the amount of plasma or serum separated may be limited
`to 50% of the absorption volume of the matrix. often
`requiring the use of external pressure. such as in European
`Patent Application 0 194 502. in order to obtain the maxi-
`mum efiiciency and quantity of plasma or serum._
`Other separating agents. such as water-soluble salts.
`amino acids. carbohydrates and large polymers. such as
`polyethylene glycol. polyvinyl alcohol and the like. have
`been incorporated into single matrix test strips. Fetter in U.S.
`Pat. Nos. 3.552.925 and 3.552.928 describes a test device
`having a bibulous matrix impregnated with an inorganic salt
`or amino acid at a first region on the matrix and test reagents
`impregnated at an adjacent second region. While the salts or
`amino acids used in this process can separate the cellular
`components from the whole blood.
`they also introduce
`contaminating ions or molecules into the plasma or serum
`and precipitate a portion of the soluble plasma or serum
`constituents. thus rendering a quantitative assay for the
`soluble constituent unreliable. Rapkin et al. in U.S. Pat. No.
`4.678.757 describe the use of carbohydrates. such as
`mannitol. impregnated or coated onto a carrier. preferably
`coated onto an impermeable carrier. The described device.
`whether having a permeable or impermeable carrier.
`however. only.provides for capillary and longitudinal trans-
`port of the blood. Therefore. the blood separation matrices
`of Raplrin et al. are not described as being useful in test
`devices that operate primarily by gravitational force. as do
`many of the multi—layer test devices currently used by
`doctors or patients. While Kiser et al. in U.S. Pat. No.
`5.306.623 describe separation matrices which can operate by
`wicking gravity flow. Kiser et al. use large polymeric
`separating reagents. such as polyethylene glycol. polysty-
`rene sulfonic acid. hydroxypropyl cellulose. polyvinyl
`alcohol. polyvinylpyrrolidone. and polyacrylic acid. Upon
`application of a whole blood sample. such large polymers
`contained within a matrix would be solubilized. potentially
`blocking the pores of the matrix and most certainly render-
`ing the sample more viscous. thereby slowing the separation
`process and decreasing the yield of plasma.
`Based on the shortcomings of these methods. there exists
`a need for a device that provides rapid and eflicient methods
`for the separation of plasma or serum from whole blood. In
`particular. there is an increasing awareness of the impor-
`tance of. and accordingly a need for. being able to carry out
`diagnostic assays at the doctor‘s oflice or. better yet. at
`home. Therefore. there exists a need to minimize any extra
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`lnfopia Ex. 1020 pg. 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`5,762,871
`
`3
`manipulative steps. such as the rinsing or wiping of test
`devices or the application of external pressure. Moreover.
`there is a need for rapid separation which is reliable and does
`not contain interfering substances. The present invention
`satisfies these needs and provides related advantages as well.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates to a method and to a device
`for separating plasma from whole blood. The method and
`device utilize a permeable non-glass fiber matrix containing
`a polyol which is capable of clumping red blood cells. The
`matrix. in the absence of such a polyol. would otherwise be
`porous to red blood cells. The polyol-containing mau'ix has
`a first surface and a second surface such that a whole blood
`sample which is applied to the first surface flows direction‘
`ally toward the second surface. Plasma separated from
`whole blood becomes available at the second surface of the
`matrix and can be tested for the presence of a particular
`analyte. such as glucose or fructosamine. as provided by
`multi-layer test devices of the present invention.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 depicts one embodiment of a multi—layer fruc«
`tosamine test device which can be used for separating
`plasma from a whole blood sample and measuring the
`concentration of fructosamine.
`
`10
`
`l5
`
`2O
`
`25
`
`FIG. 2 exemplifies one embodiment of a glucose test
`device which is useful for separating plasma from whole
`blood and measuring the concentration of glucose.
`
`30
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`There is an increasing awareness of the importance of
`being able to carry out diagnostic assays at the doctor’s
`oflice or. better yet. at home. For example. a diabetic’s blood
`glucose level fluctuates significantly throughout a given day.
`being influenced by diet. activity. and treatment. Depending
`on the nature and severity of the individual case. some
`diabetic patients measure their blood glucose levels up to
`seven times a day. Clearly. the results of these tests should
`be available to the patient immediately.
`Because of the frequent fluctuation of glucose levels in a
`given day. tests which are independent of a patient's diet.
`activity. and/or treatment and which provide longer term
`indications of blood glucose levels have been developed.
`These tests measure the concentration of glycated proteins
`or “frucosamines.” Proteins. such as those present in whole
`blood. plaSma. serum and other biological fluids react with
`glucose. under non-enzymatic conditions. to produce gly-
`cated proteins. The extent of the reaction is directly depen-
`dent upon the glucose concentration of the blood. Measure-y
`ment of serum or plasma fructosarnine levels is useful for
`monitoring diabetic control because fructosamine concen—
`trations in serum or plasma reflect an average of blood
`glucose level over approximately a half month period
`Scandinavian investigators recently showed that doctors
`and patients who were made aware of their glycated protein
`test results had better glycemic control than those who were
`unaware of such results. Moreover. it is now believed that
`glycated proteins can be the causative agents of complica-
`tions associated with diabetes. which include retinopathy.
`nephropathy. neuropathy and cardiovascular disease.
`Therefore. any delay in information transfer. such as a
`doctor's delay in reporting clinical test results to a patient.
`decreases the value of the test result. Again. this emphasizes
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`4
`the importance in being able to perform diagnostic assays at
`the doctor‘s office or at home.
`
`For an assay to be useful in the doctor’s office or home.
`the test should be relatively free of sensitivity to small
`changes in the conditions under which the assayis carried
`out and the measurements should be accurate and reliable.
`Equally as important. if not more so. the assay must have a
`simple and convenient protocol which does not involve extra
`manipulative steps. To enhance the simplicity and conve-
`nience of such tests. the preferable body fluid for testing
`such analytes as glucose and fructosamine is whole blood
`which can simply be taken from a finger or earlobe puncture.
`Such simple and rapid determinations of an analyte in blood
`is especially desirable in the case of an emergency.
`As described above. the simplicity and accuracy of such
`tests depends to a large extent on the whole blood separation
`layer contained within the test device and the ability of the
`blood separation matrix to provide uncontaminated plasma
`or serum. The present invention provides a method and
`device. namely a blood separation-matrix. which is capable
`of such simple and accurate blood separation. Of particular
`importance. the matrix contains a polyol which causes red
`blood cells contained in whole blood to clump. The clumped
`red blood cells either can be retained in the matrix or can be
`filtered by a filter material. The method and matrix can be
`used in various test devices which analyze whole blood for
`a particular analyte. such as. the fructosamine and glucose
`test devices provided by the present invention.
`As used herein. the term “plasma” means the substantially
`colorless fluid obtained from a whole blood sample after red
`blood cells have been removed by the separation process and
`device of the present invention. Because plasma is serum
`plus the clotting protein fibrinogen. the term “plasma" is
`used broadly herein to include both plasma and serum.
`In order to obtain plasma from whole blood. the present
`invention provides a permeable non-glass fiber matrix con-
`taining a polyol which is capable of clumping red blood
`cells. The matrix is porous to red blood cells in the absence
`of such a polyol. The matrix has a first surface for sample
`application and a second surface where plasma is received or
`becomes available. If desired. the matrix additionally can
`contain a polycationic polymer. Also useful. though not
`required. is a permeable filter material or membrane sup-
`porting the separation matrix which serves as a final filter to
`red blood cells and/or provides a reagent layer for effecting
`an assay. Each of these components of the invention. as well
`as test devices which use the blood separation method and
`matrix of the present invention are disclosed in detail.
`MATRIX
`
`The separation matrix of the present invention is a per—
`meable matrix which does not contain glass fibers and;
`therefore. is termed “a permeable non-glass fiber matrix.”
`The term “permeable” means liquid-permeable. such as
`permeable to plasma. as well as permeable or porous to red
`blood cells when the matrix is provided in the absence of a
`polyol. As used herein. the phrase “matrix being porous to
`red blood cells in the absence of a polyo " means that
`without the polyol contained in or on the matrix the red
`blood cells would simply pass through the matrix. virtually
`immediately. In the absence of the polyol. red blood cells are
`not retained. by filtration or otherwise. in die matrix.
`The polyol contained within or on the matrix chemically
`reacts with the whole blood sample so as to clump the red
`blood cells. As used herein. “clump” or “clumping” means
`the collection into a mass or group. red blood cells distrib-
`
`lnfopia Ex. 1020 pg. 5
`
`

`

` Ill
`
`l
`
`5,762,871
`
`5
`uted in a whole blood sample. While not wishing to be
`bound by any theory or mechanism the clumping can be the
`result of agglutination. coagulation. or the like. or some
`other chemical interaction between the polyol and the red
`blood cells. Thus. the present invention. is not strictly a
`filtration process. for example. based on the pore size of the
`matrix. as described. for example. in U.S. Pat No. 4.543.338
`to Chen. or as used in a glass fiber prefilter. such as that
`described in U.S. Pat. No. 4.477.575 to Vogel et al. Rather.
`it is the presence of a polyol which provides the matrix with
`its ability to separate plasma from whole blood by clumping
`the red blood cells.
`
`Surprisingly. the clumping of the red blood cells by the
`polyol does not substantially block the flow of the whole
`blood sample or plasma through the matrix. Thus. sufficient
`amounts of plasma become available at the second surface
`of the matrix. Sufficient quantities of plasma can rapidly be
`obtained for the specific applications exemplified herein.
`namely analyzing the concentration of frucotosamine or
`glucose in drops of whole blood. The present invention can
`be used with other applications and diagnostic assays as
`well. including ones which use a larger volume of blood or
`which require more plasma. With as small as a 3/15" diameter
`circle of a polyol-containing matrix of the present invention.
`as much as 10 ul of plasma can be obtained from a drop of
`blood. Therefore. a matrix of the present invention can be
`used for separating larger volumes of blood than a drop of
`blood. Accordingly. the matrix can be used in diagnostic
`applications which analyze larger quantifies of blood. such
`as for example. some known cholesterol tests.
`A useful permeable matrix can be a woven or non-woven
`material and can be an absorbent or a non-absorbent material
`which may or may not be hydrophilic. Especially suitable
`materials for the matrix include. for example. woven or
`non-woven. absorbent or non-absorbent. nylon. rayon.
`cotton. and polyester. In one embodiment of the invention.
`the matrix is a non-woven. non-absorbent polyester. The
`polyester is preferably a poly(paraphenylene terephthalate).
`such as that used in a preferred polyester sold as Sontara®
`(DuPont. Inc.. Wilmington. Del.). Another preferred matrix
`is the woven. absorbent nylon Tetex® 3-3710 (Tetko. Inc..
`Lancaster. N.Y.).
`Depending upon the porosity or other properties of the
`matrix. the clumped red blood cells either are retained in the
`matrix or are filtered out by the filter material as described
`below. Some of the above-described matrix materials. such
`as the non-woven. non-absorbent polyesters. do not have
`“pores" in the traditional sense. i.e.. that can be measured.
`for example. by pore size (microns). In the absence of a
`polyol of the present invention such materials essentially
`have no limit as the porosity and are porous to red blood
`cells. which have an average size of 5 pm. With such
`macroporous materials. if the polyol is not present the red
`blood cells pass through the matrix almost immediately. For
`those matrix materials which can be characterized based on
`pore size. the matrices used in the present invention can have
`a pore size generally of from about 2 pm to about 10 um.
`Such pores sizes can be useful for retaining the clumped red
`blood cells. Depending upon the porosity. thickness. which
`is generally 200 to 1100 um. and other properties of the
`matrix. such as absorbency. the clumped red blood cells are
`either retained in the matrix or captured in a final filter
`material as described below.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`The polyol-containing matrix has a first surface for
`sample application and a second surface where plasma is
`received or becomes available for testing or additional
`separation. Generally.
`the first 'and second surfaces are
`
`65
`
`6
`
`presented as opposite sides of the matrix. The whole blood
`sample flows in a direction from the first surface toward the
`second surface. under conditions which provide such direc~
`tional flow. such as. gravitation. vacuum. or external pres-
`sure. To enhance the simplicity of the method. if desired.
`separation can be performed by gravity alone. Preferably.
`the separation matrix provides for flow in a vertical
`direction. preferably by gravitation.
`Rapkin et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 4.678.757. describe the use
`of carbohydrates. such as mannitol. impregnated or coated
`onto a carrier. preferably coated onto an impenneable car-
`rier. HoweVer. the described device of Rapkin et al.. whether
`having a permeable or impermeable carrier. only provides
`for capillary and lateral transport of the blood. There can be
`divergent contact times provided by vertical flow. a rela-
`tively short period of contact. versus lateral flow. a slow
`process which can involve continuous interaction between a
`whole blood sample and a matrix. Because of these variable
`contact times. it is not predictable that what works by lateral
`flow would similarly work under vertical
`flow.
`Unexpectedly. with the present invention. even with matri-
`ces which are porous to red blood cells in the absence of a
`polyol. a matrix containing a polyol can efiectively separate
`plasma from whole blood even when the blood sample flows
`vertically through the matrix.
`
`POLYOL
`
`The separation method and devich include a permeable
`non-glass fiber matrix containing a polyol. As used herein.
`the terms “matrix containing a polyol” and “polyol-
`containing man-ix” mean that the polyol is separately added ‘
`to the matrix and is not a component originally found in the
`composition or make up of the matrix. such as cellulose filter
`paper. Further. “matrix containing a polyo ” means a polyol
`can be impregnated into the matrix or coated into or onto the
`matrix or covalently or non-covalently bound to the matrix.
`In a preferred embodiment. the polyol is impregnated into
`the man-ix.
`
`As used herein. the term "polyol" means a polyhydroxy
`alcohol which is an alkyl or aromatic containing more than
`one hydroxyl group. The term “poly” as used in “polyol"
`does not infer that the alkyl or aromatic compound is a large
`polymer made up of repeating monomeric units. but.
`instead. means that more than one hydroxyl group is present
`in the compound. As discussed more fully below. with the
`exception of polysaccharides. the polyols used in the present
`invention are simple sugars or sugar alcohols.
`oligosaccharides. or other naturally or non~naturally occur~
`ring non-polymeric alkyl or aromatic compounds.
`Therefore. the term “polyol" encompasses sugars. alcohol
`derivatives of sugars. herein termed “sugar alcohols." and
`other naturally or non-naturallyvoccurring non-polymeric
`polyols.
`‘
`As used herein. “sugar" includes monosaccharides.
`oligosaccha‘rides. and polysaccharides. A monosaccharide is
`a simple sugar which is as a linear. branched. or cyclic
`polyhydroxy alcohol containing either an aldehyde or a
`ketone group. Exemplary monosaccharides include. but are
`not limited to. mannose. glucose. talose. galactose. xylose.
`arabinose. lyxose. ribose and fructose. An oiigosaccharide is
`a linear or branched carbohydrate that consists from two to
`ten mouosaccharide units joined by means of glycosidic
`bonds. Oligosaccharides which can be used in the present
`invention include. but are not limited to disaccharides such
`as sucrose.
`trehalose. lactose and maltose. Examples of
`larger oligosaccharides which can be used in the invention
`
`lnfopia Ex. 1020 pg. 6
`
`

`

`5 ,762,871
`
`7
`include the cyclodextrins. such as alpha-cyclohexylamylose.
`beta-cycloheptaamylose. and gamma—cyclooctoamylose. as
`well as other oligosaccharides well known in the art. A
`polysaccharide is any linear or branched polymer having
`more than ten monosaccharides linked together by glyco-
`sidic bonds. Exemplary polysaccharides include. but are not
`limited to. ficoll. polysucrose. and hydroxyethyl starch.
`Encompassed within “sugar” are those sugars which are
`naturally occurring as well as those which are known but
`which have not yet been identified as occurring naturally in
`plants or animals. For example. there are five known natu-
`rally occurring aldohexoses.
`including D-glucose.
`D-mannose. D-talose. D-galactose. and L-galactose.
`However. the aldohexose structure has four chiral carbons
`and thus. sixteen possible stereoisomers. all of which are
`known. although only the five listed above have been
`identified as occurring naturally in plantsor animals. Thus.
`“sugar” encompasses enantiomers in either the D or L forms
`of a sugar as well as racemic mixtures thereof.
`A polyol of the present invention also can be a “sugar
`alcohol.” A “sugar alcohol" is an alcohol derivative of a
`mono- or an oligosaccharide which is generally formed by
`reduction of the aldehyde or ketone moiety on the mono- or
`oligosaccharide. Exemplary sugar alcohols include. but are
`not
`limited to. mannitol. sorbitol. arabitol.
`inositol.
`galactitol. erythritol. and threitol. Also included within the
`definition of “sugar alcoho ” are the alcohol derivatives of
`those mono- and oligosaocharides described above.
`Where chiral carbons are present in the sugar alcohol. the
`sugar alcohol may be in the D or L form. such as D-threitol
`or L-threitol. or in a racemic mixture of both the D and L
`forms. The sugar alcohol can. but does not have to. be
`naturally occurring. That is.
`the sugar alcohol can be a
`derivative of a knOWn. naturally occurring sugar. or.
`alternatively. it can have a D or L configuration known to
`exist but not necessarily identified as occurring in nature.
`The sugar alcohol also can be a sugar which is found
`naturally in its reduced alcohol form or it can be an alcohol
`derivative of a sugar which derivative is not known to exist
`in nature.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`8
`polyvinyl alcohol. polyvinylpyrrolidone. and polyacrylic
`acid. Upon application of a whole blood sample. such large
`polymers contained within a matrix would be solubilized.
`potentially blocking the pores of the matrix and most
`certainly rendering the sample more viscous. thereby slow-
`ing the separation process and decreasing the yield of
`plasma. Therefore. with the exception of the above-
`described' polysaccharides. the invention does not involve
`the use of large alkyl polymers as the primary separating
`agent. The matrix described in US. Pat. No. 5.306.623 is
`different from the instant invention in a number of other
`aspects as well. For instance. the Examples given in US.
`Pat. No. 5.306.623 involve the use of matrices which have
`a very small pore size. less than 1 pm. which would act as
`a filter to red blood cells in the absence of the disclosed
`polymers. As discussed above. the present invention is not
`strictly a filtration process.‘rather it involves the use of
`polyols which clump red blood cells and in the absence of
`such red blood cells the matrix would be porous to red blood
`cells. Moreover. the matrices taught by Kiser et al.. in
`addition to a polymer. also contain the test reagents. which
`reagents may substantially influence the separation and test
`results. The separation matrix of the present invention does
`not contain the test reagents. The test reagents. as disclosed
`in greater detail below. are either on the filter material or
`additional test reagent layers and the like.
`In one embodiment. to apply the polyol to the matrix. the
`polyol can simply be dissolved in an aqueous solution
`generally. at a concentration of about 20% when used alone.
`and at about 10% concentration when combined with a
`polycationic polymer. which is generally present in a con-
`centration of about 0.5% to 5% as diswssed more fully
`below. If desired. multiple layers of matrices containing
`polyol at lower concentrations. such as four layers of matrix
`containing 5% polyol. also can be used. The polyol and. if
`present. the polycationic polymer can alternatively be dis-
`solved in physiological saline (0.85% NaCl). phosphate
`buffered saline (PBS). an organic solvent. or the like.
`
`POLYCATIONIC POLYMER
`
`45
`
`In addition to sugar or sugar alcohols. the polyol can be
`a non-polymeric naturally occurring or non—naturally occur-
`ring polyol. which includes linear. branched. or cyclic alkyl
`or aromatic compounds containing more than one hydroxyl
`group. As used herein the term“non—polymeric” means the
`alkyl or aromatic compounds are not polymers. Polymers
`are defined as high molecular weight compounds consisting
`of long chains that may be open. closed. linear. branched. or
`crosslinked. which chains are composed of repeating units.
`called monomers. which may be either identical or different.
`As used herein. those polyols which are “naturally occur-
`ring" are ones which occur in nature and those which are
`“non-nattn'ally occurring" are notfound in nature. Generally.
`these naturally occurring or non-naturally occurring alkyl or 55
`aromatic compounds range in size from three to twenty
`carbons (C3 to C20). and more preferably. from three to ten
`carbons (C3 to Cm)- Examples of such naturally occurring.
`non-polymeric polyols are glycerol. a three-carbon trihy—
`droxy alcohol that occurs in many lipids. and quinic acid. a 60
`1.3.4.5-Tetrahydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid. which
`acid can be in the salt form. Examples of non-naturally
`occurring. non—polymeric polyols include pentaerythritol
`and dipentaerythritol.
`Kiser et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5.306.623 describe the use of 65
`large polymeric separating reagents. such as polyethylene
`glycol. polystyrene sulfonic acid. hydroxypropyl cellulose.
`
`In addition to the polyol. a polycationic polymer can. but
`does not have to. be added to the matrix. Similar to the
`addition of a polyol to the matrix. the polycationic polymer
`can also be physically impregnated. coated into or onto. or
`covalently or non—covalently bound to the matrix. The
`polycationic polymer is also useful for clumping. as well as
`stabilizing clumped. red blood cells. the latter of which is
`described for example. in the published Canadian Patent
`Application No. 2.104.976 to Daubney et al.. which is
`incorporated herein by reference.
`The polycationic polymer component can be any polymer
`having more than one cationic site and are generally based
`on monomers which contain an amine group.
`Suitable polycationic polymers include. for example.
`hex‘adimethrine
`bromide.
`trimethylenehexamethylenediammoniumbromide.
`polylysine. polyallylamine. polyarginine. poly(N.N—
`dimethylaminoethylmethacrylate. copolymers of N.N-
`dimethylaminoethyhnethacrylate and methylmethacrylale.
`polyethyleneimine. poly(diallyldimethylammonium
`chloride). poly(1.1-dimethyl—3.S-dimethylenepiperidinium
`chloride). and mixtures thereof. The polymerized positively
`charged amino acids. such as polylysine. can have the amino
`acids in either the D or L forms. such as poly-L-lysine or
`poly-D-lysine. or a racemic mixture thereof. such as poly-
`D.L-lysine.
`.
`
`Infopia Ex. 1020 pg. 7
`
`

`

`5,762,371
`
`9
`As described above. in one

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket