throbber
EXHIBIT 1014
`
`US. PATENT NO. 5,215,886 TO PATEL ET AL.
`
`lnfopia Ex. 1014 pg. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`,
`United States Patent
`'
`Patel et al.
`
`[19]
`
`'
`
`[54] HDL DETERMINATION IN WHOLE BLOOD
`[76]
`Inventors: P. Jivan Patel, 1235 Wildwood Ave.
`,
`.
`.
`(#102), Sunnyvale, Cale. 94089,
`.
`Mchael P. Allen, 677 W. Garland
`.
`.
`Tet" sunnyvale’ Cal1f. 94°86;
`Prithipal Singh, 25627 Elena Rd.,
`'
`Los Altos Hills, Calif. 94022
`The portion of the term of this patent
`Silbsefiluem t9 SeP- 25. 2007 has been
`disclaimed.
`-
`_
`121] APPL N03 516,528
`[22] Filed:
`Nov. 21’ 1990
`
`[ "' ] Notice:
`
`.
`
`[63]
`
`Related US. Application Data
`.
`‘
`.
`'
`~
`fiz’gm‘gt’z’mngm £215.“- No‘ 95713451 ;May 24}
`' a a" one . w c
`‘5 3 ”mm“ lon'm'pm °
`Ser. No. 353,910, May 18, 1989, Pat» No. 4,959,324,
`which is a continuation-in-part of 851. No. 195,881,
`May 19, 1988, Pat. No. 4,999,237, and a continuation.
`in-part of Ser. No. 64,883, Jun. 22, 1987, Pat. No.
`4,973,549.
`
`lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIllllllll'
`.
`U5005215886A
`.
`[11] Patent Number:
`5,215,886
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Jun. 1, 1993
`.
`
`:1:
`
`.
`
`[51]
`
`‘
`
`[56]
`
`Int. Cl.5 ......................... C12Q 1/60; C12Q 1/26;
`,
`Cle 1/28; GOIN 21/00
`[52] US. Cl. ........................................ 435/11; 422/56;
`435/25; 435/28; 436/71; 436/169; 436/170
`.
`[58] Field of Search ....................... 435/11, 19, 25, 28;
`436/71 824 169 170- 422/551
`’
`’
`’
`’
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,959,324 9/1990 Ramel et 11.1.
`........................ 436/169
`Pr:
`Ex
`M h
`l G W h
`‘mary
`aminer— ic ae
`.*
`itys yn
`Assistant Examiner—Ralph Gitomer
`, Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Bertram I, Rowland
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`
`High density lipoprotein-cholesterol determination is
`made'employing a device which allows for removal of
`red blood cells measurement of sample‘volume re-
`’
`.
`.
`’
`3:10:31 Of II’DL and VLD..L’ and. quantitation 0f HDL'
`0 0 we“? 0'1 a quantitatlon SmP‘
`'
`17 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`10
`
`lnfopia Ex. 1014 pg. 2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`June 1, 1993
`
`Sheet 1 of 2
`
`5,215,886
`
`—-—>
`
`,
`
`
`
`D.”
`
`
`
`an.mm.mm
`
`-—-—>
`
`K
`
`-——>
`
`Infopia Ex. 1014 pg. 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`June 1, 1993'
`
`Sheet ~2 of 2
`
`5,215,886
`
`F
`
`Iii/1931?;
`
`‘
`
`’E
`
`lnfopia Ex. 1014 pg. 4
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`5,215,886
`
`- 2
`
`I-IDL DETERMINATION IN WHOLE BLOOD
`
`RELEVANT LITERATURE
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`This application is a continuation-in-part of applica-
`tion Ser. No. 357,045 filed May 24, 1990, now aban~
`doned, which is a continuation-in-part of application
`Ser. No. 353,910, filed May 18, 1989 now US Pat. No.
`4,959,324, which in turn was a continuation-in-part of
`application Ser. No. 195,881 filed May 19, 1988', now_
`US Pat. Nos. 4,999,287, and 64,883 Jun. 22, 1987, now
`US. Pat. No. 4,973,549.
`‘
`‘
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1. TechnicalField
`The field of this invention is noninstrumented quanti-
`tative determination of high-density lipoprotein—choles-
`terol in whole blood;
`2. Background
`High-density lipoprotein (HDL) consists of a number
`of heterogeneous particles that vary with respect to
`size, content of lipid, and apolipoprotein. The major
`apolipoproteins found in HDL are A0) and A01) and
`these proteins constitute about 90% of total HDL pro-
`tein. The roles of HDL in lipid transport are (l) to act
`as a reservoir of C apoprotein required for triglyceride
`transport; (2) to act as a “scavenger” of surplus choles-
`terol and phospholipids liberated from lipolysed tri-
`glyceride-rich lipoproteins; and (3) to transport surplus
`cholesterol from peripheral tissues to the liver for ex-
`cretion and catabolism, both directly and indirectly, via
`other lipoproteins and the lipid transfer proteins.
`HDL concentration has been feund to correlate in-
`versely with coronary heart disease. Epidemiologic
`studies have emphasized the importance of HDL as a
`negative risk factor. There is,
`therefore, substantial
`demand for an easy method for quantitation of this
`lipoprotein. Currently,
`the determination of HDL—
`cholesterol
`is extremely difficult and impractical
`to
`‘quantitate directly. The primary methods depend on the
`measurement of the plasma content of HDL.-cholesterol
`after selective separation. Several methods are available
`for separation, such as ultra-centrifugation, electropho-
`resis, precipitation as in soluble complexes between
`lipoproteins, polyanions and divalent cations,- gel or
`membrane filtration;.and precipitation with antibodies
`to the apolipoproteins.
`Ultracentrifugation, followed by precipitation with
`heparin and manganese chloride is the most commonly
`used reference method. Ultraeentrifugation separates
`VLDL on the basis of differential density, while hepa-
`rin-manganese chloride removes LDL by precipitation.
`HDL is estimated as cholesterol in the plasma fraction
`of a density greater than 1.063 g/ml. Ultra-centrifuga-
`tion requires expensive instrumentation and significant
`technical skill and has therefore found limited applica-
`tion. Electrophoretic techniques lack precision and
`' accuracy in the range of 20—40 mg/dL, where the great-
`est clinical interest lies. Gelpermeation chromatogra-
`phy is too complex and time consuming for routine
`analysis. There is, therefore, a clear interest in the de-
`velopment of techniques having relatively simple proto-
`cols and equipment for the quantitative determination
`of cholesterol in high-density lipoprotein.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`2O
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`-
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65.
`
`See also Allen, M. P., Delizza, A., Raine], U., Jeong,
`H., and Singh, P. A Non-instrumented Quantitative Teri
`System and its Application for Determining Cholesterol
`Concentration in Whole Blood, Clin. Chem. 1990; 36(9)
`1591—1597; and 'Rarnel, U., Allen, M. P., 'and Singh, P.
`Sample Pad Assay Initiation Device and Method ofMak-
`ing U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,324, issued Sep. 25, 1990.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`is quantitated
`High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol
`from blood by removal of apoB containing lipoproteins
`with a membrane, followed by enzymatic reaction of
`cholesterol and cholesterol esters to produce hydrogen
`peroxide. The hydrogen peroxide is then quantitated on
`a quantitation strip to which a~coupling dye is bound,
`which reacts with the product of the peroxidase to
`produce a detectable colored product.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`FIGS. la and lb are diagrammatic side views of a
`separation device and the quantitation strips, respec-
`tively; and
`FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic plan view of a base plate
`and slide of an alternative quantitation device. .
`DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIFIC
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`Method and devices are provided for the determina-
`tion of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol
`(HDL-
`cholesterol) from blood. The methodand device pro-
`vide for initial removal of a substantial proportion of the
`red blood cells present in the blood, removal of substan-
`tially all of the very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)
`and «low density lipoprotein (LDL), which lipoproteins
`contain apo B lipoprotein. The resulting HDL-choles~
`terol concentrated plasma fraction is then treated with
`enzymes which react with cholesterol and cholesterol
`esters to produce hydrogen peroxide. Preferably, the
`hydrogen peroxide is then measured by transport of the
`hydrogen peroxide on a quantitation strip in conjunc-
`tion with a peroxidase, where a compound is conju-
`gated to the strip. The reaction of the peroxidase with a
`coupling compound results in the coupling compound
`reacting with another compound bound to the strip
`with production of a highly colored product. The dis-
`tance of the colored front from the sample site or other
`designated position is quantitatively related to the
`amount of HDL-cholesterol in the blood sample.
`. A series of membranes are provided which allow for
`a number of functions in producing the desired sample,
`which is free of red blood cells and free of cholesterol
`associated with lipoproteins other than HDL. The first
`stage is the application of the blood sample to one or
`more membranes, desirably having diminishing pore
`size. The membranes are selected to efficiently remove
`red blood cells without lysis. Significant lysis of. red
`blood cells results in the discoloration of the sample,
`which discoloration interferes with the measurement
`for the determination of 'HDL—cholesterol and more
`importantly hemoglobin may chemically interfere with
`the assay system. Generally, the pore size will be in the
`range of 0.5 to 50 um, whereas with two filters, the first
`filter will have a pore size in the range of about 5 to 50
`um, while the second filter will have a pore size in the
`range of about 0.5 to 10 pm. The filters are selected to
`minimize the sample holdup in the filter and should
`
`lnfopia Ex. 1014 pg. 5
`
`

`

`5,215,886
`
`.
`3
`substantially reduce the red blood cells (RBC) which
`are transferred to the next membrane layer.
`The next membrane layer nonnally serves to remove
`VLDL and LDL, which'include apolipoproteins B, C
`and E and various techniques may be employed for the
`removal of the cholesterol associated with VLDL and
`LDL. Alternatively one may use two treated glass fibre
`membranes for removal of LDL and VLDL at the same
`time as the RBC are being removed.
`Another‘ possibility is the use of either one or more
`filters (filter 1 and/or 2) to remove VLDL and LDL,
`while at the same time separating the red blood cells
`(see FIG. 1a).
`~
`In a preferred embodiment, a membrane comprising a.
`divalent cation containing anionic polymer, which min-
`imizes red blood cell lysis and efficiently separates the
`VLDL and LDL from the HDL, is employed. Illustra-
`tive of such polyanion products are dextran sulfate
`having magnesium as the counterion, or sodium heparin
`having divalent manganese as the counterion. Of partic-
`ular interest, therefore, are polymers of at least about
`5,000 molecular weight, usually at least about 50,000
`molecular weight, particularly heparin (5—20 kDal) or
`dextran (25—500 kDal) which are sulfuric acid deriva-
`tives, sulfonates or sulfates, in conjunction with divalent
`cations, particularly magnesium and manganese. The
`polymers may be covalently or non-covalently bound
`to a porous substrate, so long as the polymers are re-
`tained by the porous substrate during the subject proce-
`dure. Various substrates may be employed, such as glass
`fiber, paper, synthetic membranes, or the like. The vari-
`ous substrates may be activated for covalent bonding by
`a variety of conventional agents, such as silane, e.g.,
`aminopropyltriethoxysilane, with glass fiber, activated,
`e.g., carbodiimide-activated, paper or synthetic mem-
`branes, or the like. The amount of polymer bound to the
`membrane may be readily determined by determining
`the efficiency with which the HDL is separated from
`the VLDL and LDL and the loss of HDL on the mem-
`brane. The polymers may be bound to any or all of the
`porous filtration substrates. That is in a preferred em-
`bodiment, the VLDL and LDL precipitating reagent
`may be bound to polymeric membrane, filter 1, filter 2,
`membrane 3 or it may be bound to the sample receiving
`pad. The precipitating reagents may be bound onto any
`combinations of 2 or 3 or all porous substrates. (See
`FIG. 1)
`Usually, the amount of polymer will be about 0.001 g
`to 0.5 g per cmz. The membrane will generally have a
`thickness in the range of about 10 um to 1000 pm and a
`pore size in the range of about 0.1 to 50 um.
`‘
`Instead of using precipitating reagents, affinity rea-
`gents may be employed, such as monoclonal or poly- ‘
`clonal antibodies specific for apolipoproteins B, C, and
`E. The use of the antibodies also allows the determina~
`tion of LDL uncontaminated with HDL, by employing
`antibodies specific for the apo A protein on the LDL,
`which will allow passage of the HDL through the mem-
`brane.
`,
`The antibodies may be bound to the membranes de-
`scribed above by analogous techniques, using carbodi-
`imide, cyanogen bromide, diazo compounds, activated
`olefins for reaction with thiol' groups, or the like. The
`amount of antibodies bound to the membrane will vary
`with the affinity of the antibody, the number of active
`sites, the molecular weight of the antibody, e.g., IgM or
`IgG, or the like. Usually, the amount of antibody will be
`in the range of about 0.1 ug to 100 pg per cmz. These
`
`10
`
`l5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`4
`antibodies may be immobilized on the polymeric mem-
`brane, filters 1 or 2 or membrane 3 or on the sample
`receiving pad (FIG. 1). The polymeric membrane may,
`be positioned above, or in between filters 1 and 2, or
`membrane 3.
`There may be one or more additional membranes to
`separate the sample receiving pad from the LDL re-
`moving membrane, to control flow, to further remove
`particulate matter, or for other purposes. These mem-
`branes will not be reactive, generally having pore sizes
`in the range of about 0.5 pm to 1.0,p.m.
`Illustrative membranes which may find use for re-
`moval of red blood cells include 8&8 Glass 30, What-
`man GFD, S&S 3662, Pall glass fiber membranes, Sar-
`torius cellulose acetate, Filterite polysulfone asymmet—
`ric membrane, Ultrabind 450, Nucleopore, etc. Mem-
`branes which find use for removal of LDL are illus-
`trated by Whatman GFD, Whatman 31ET or Ultrabind
`450.
`.
`The sample is received by a sample pad. The sample
`pad may serve a number of functions. The sample pad,
`in conjunction with other components, may serve to
`measure the volume of the sample. The sample pad will
`usually have a volume ofabout 1 to 60 ill and a thick-
`ness of about 0.1 to 5 mm, In addition, the sample pad
`may have one or more reactants, particularly enzyme
`reactants bound to the pad. The sample pad will initially
`be protected from contact with the quantitation strip.
`Various mechanisms may be employed to provide a
`barrier for contact between the sample pad and the
`quantitation strip, which barrier may be moved to allow
`for contact between the sample pad and the quantitation
`strip.
`7
`~
`The sample pad may conveniently be a bibulous
`membrane, which will absorb the plasma sample and
`serve as a bridge for transport of eluent from an eluent
`source through the sample pad to conversion pad and
`subsequently to the quantitation strip and allow for
`substantially quantitative transport of cholesterol (in-
`cluding cholesterol precursors) or an enzymatic reac-
`tion product of cholesterol from the reaction pad to the
`quantitation strip.
`While it is preferred that one or more of the mem-
`branes serve to remove VLDL and LDL, the reagent
`may be present solely on the sample pad, solely on the
`membrane for removing RBCs, combinations thereof,
`or on all or some of the components of the device in.
`which the plasma contacts before undergoing substan-
`tial enzymatic reaction. Where the enzymes are on the
`pad, the reagent for removing the VLDL and LDL will
`not be restricted to the sample pad.
`The cholesterol is measured by reaction with a com-
`bination of enzymes, cholesterol esterase and choles-
`terol oxidase. The es'terase provides for hydrolysis of
`cholesterol esters to cholesterol,'while cholesterol oxi-
`dase provides for oxidation of cholesterol with oxygen
`to hydrogen peroxide. The enzyme may be present on
`the pad, may be upstream from the pad in a reaction
`zone prior to the quantitation region of the quantitation
`strip, or a'combination thereof. The enzymes may but
`are not required to be non-diffusively bound to the
`surface, so that the enzymes will substantially remain at
`the site where they are positioned prior to the beginning
`of the assay.
`‘
`The sample pad may be protected from acting as a
`bridge and contacting the quantitation strip in a variety
`of ways. In one embodiment, a removable plastic bar-
`rier may be inserted between the sample pad, the quanti-
`
`~
`
`Infopia Ex. 1014 pg. 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`5
`tation strip, and the strip providing the source of eluent.
`The plastic barrier may include a mesh strip, e.g., Ni-
`tex ®, 100—50011, for wiping the pad of excess sample.
`In another embodiment, the pad may be at a site distant
`from the quantitation strip and the eluent providing
`strip, where after receiving the sample, the sample pad
`is moved into contact with the two strips. In both of
`these cases, various wiping means may be employed to
`remove excess sample from the pad, so that a substan—
`tially reproducible amount of sample will be absbrbed
`by the pad.
`The eluent-supplying strip may be of any convenient
`bibulous material which can be dipped into an eluent
`and wick the eluent up to the sample pad, when the '
`15
`sample pad is in contact with the eluent source strip
`Various papers may find use, such as cellulose strips,
`e.g.., chromatography paper, silica on a support, alu-
`mina on a support, polymeric membranes, such as nitro-
`cellulose and nylon Generally, the eluent source strip
`will be not less than about 0.5 cm and not more than
`about 25 cm
`
`5
`
`10
`
`.
`
`20
`
`The quantitation strip may serve, as already indi-
`cated, in providing a reaction zone, where the choles-
`terol esters and enzymes are present which will react
`with the cholesterol to produce the reactant, hydrogen
`peroxide Thus, a zone may be provided where the
`cholesterol will react to produce hydrogen peroxide,
`which will then be transported by the eluent to the
`‘ quantitation region. The quantitation region is charac-
`terized by having one member of a dye couple bound to
`the region at a Concentration which allows for a reason-
`able dynamic range associated with the concentration
`range of interest of HDL. For the most part, the con-
`centration range of' interest is from about 20 to 100
`mg/dL of HDL-cholesterol, so that one wishes to have
`at least about 10 mm, per 25 mg/dL change in conCen-
`tration, preferably. at least about 7 mm per 25 mg/dL
`and not more than about 20 mm,,usually not more than
`about 15 mm per 25 mg/dL.
`'
`‘
`The quantitation strip will generally have dimensions
`of about 5 mm to 130 mm and may be of the same or
`different material from the eluent source strip. Passively
`adsorbed to the strip will be one member of a dye cou-
`ple, such as MBTH or AAP. The coupling member may
`be any of a variety of substrates for horseradish peroxi-
`dase, which can couple with the other member bound to
`the strip. Illustrative coupling members include N,N-
`dimethylaniline; 5-(N-methylanilino pentanoyl ethylene
`diamine; N-ethylaniline; N-ethylmeta-toluidine; 2-(N-
`ethyl-meta-toluidino)ethanol; N-ethyl-N-(Z-hydroxy-S-
`sulfopropyl)-meta-toluidine sodium salt; N-ethyl, N—sul-
`fopropyl-meta-toluidine
`sodium salt; 2-(Nethyl-m;
`toluidino)ethanol, N-ethyl meta-toluidine; 1,8-dihy-
`droxy-3,6-dimethoxynaphthalene' or analogs thereof.
`These compounds are characterized by being capable of
`reacting in the presence of a peroxidase with hydrogen
`peroxide to form a compound which may be coupled
`with MBTH to form an indamine dye, which allows for
`detection of a color front in relation to the amount of
`hydrogen peroxide produced from the cholesterol in
`the sample.
`The eluent will comprise the horseradish peroxidase,
`the cdupling member, usually buffers, andgother miscel-
`laneous additives as appropriate, e.g., PVP, non-inter-
`fering proteins, detergents, particularly‘nonionic deter-
`gents, antifungal agents, etc. The concentration of the
`horseradish peroxidase will generally be in the range of
`about 0.2911/1111 to 1.611/ml, usually about 2—14 rig/ml.
`
`25
`
`3D
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`5,215,886
`
`6
`Buffers will generally provide a pH in the range of
`about 4 to 9, with a buffer concentration that will be
`sufficient to provide the necessary‘buffering, generally»
`being in the range of about 10 to 500 mM. Illustrative
`buffers include phosphate, Tris, MOPSO, MOPS, bo-
`rate, carbonate, etc.
`In carrying out the assay, a blood sample may be
`placed on the topmost membrane and gravity and capil-
`lary action provide the transport force. The blood will
`migrate through the red blood cell separating mem-
`brane(s), so that the sample is substantially free of red
`blood cells when it contacts the membrane for removal
`of cholesterol present as other than HDL. The plasma
`sample will pass through the reactant membrane, so as
`to remove LDL and VLDL and leave HDL as the only
`protein-bound cholesterol. In a second embodiment the
`red blood cell separating membranes and the treated or
`reactant membranes, which removes VLDL and LDL,
`are the same. The sample receiving pad may also be
`used as a reactant membrane, The sample will then
`migrate to the sample pad and be absorbed by the sam-
`ple pad. When the sample pad is at least saturated, the
`excess fluid will be removed as described above by
`moving the pad or other instrumentality, which serves
`to wipe the pad of the excess fluid. The pad will now be
`incontact with the eluent source strip and the quantita-
`tion strip The eluent will move through the eluent
`source strip, using the pad as a bridge and carry choles-
`terol, cholesterol esters, and/or enzymatic products of
`cholesterol up to be quantitation region, where the
`hydrogen peroxide will react with the coupling agent to
`activate the coupling agent
`to react with the other
`member of the dye bound to the Quantitation strip in the
`quantitation region. The extent of the color produced
`from an arbitrary point at the beginning of or prior to
`the quantitation region may be related to the amount of
`HDL—cholesterol1n the sample. By using known stan-
`dards, the distance of the color front from some origin,
`can be directly related to the amount of HDL-choles-
`terol1n the samplein a quantitative manner.
`Turning now to FIGS. la and 1b and 2, the subject
`invention will be further described. The separation
`device 10 of FIG. 1:: has a well~12 in which is situated
`in the direction of flow, polymeric membrane 14, filter
`1, 16, filter 2,18 membrane 3, 20 and polycarbonate
`membrane 22 The separation and well sit over sample
`pad 24
`The polymeric membrane 14 serves to remove red
`blood cells without lysis, while filters 1 and 2, 16 and 18,
`respectively, are activated to remove VLDL and LDL,
`while allowing I-IDL to pass through To further1m-
`prove filtering, membrane 20 is provided to further
`ensure removal of VLDL and LDL, where membrane
`3 may be activated1n the same or different way. from
`filters 1 and 2.
`A polycarbonate membrane 22 serves to 'prevent
`contact between membrane 3, 20 and sample pad 24.
`As depicted in FIG. 2 sample pad 24 is moved from a
`first position as shown1n the FIG. 2 to a second posi-
`tion, as shownin FIG. 1b, where the sample pad 24
`comes into contact with the conversion area 28 and
`wicking strip 26 to act as bridge to allow flow of fluid
`from the Wieldng strip 26 through the sample pad 24,
`conversion area 28, to the quantitation strip 30
`The sample on sample pad 24 is carried by wicking
`buffer from wicking strip 26 into conversion area 28'in
`which enzymes are presentto convert cholesterol and
`cholesterol esters to hydrogen peroxide. The Wicking
`
`lnfopia Ex. 1014 pg. 7
`
`
`
`
`
`1‘1
`
`
`
`

`

`7
`buffer then carries the hydrogen peroxide into the quan-
`titation area 30, where the hydrogen peroxide reacts
`with dyes under catalysis with by horseradish peroxi-
`dase. The extent of color formation is related to the
`amount of HDL present as indicated by the amount of 5
`cholesterol present in the HDL.
`The measurement device may be fabricated from
`three injection molded parts or by any other convenient
`process. The parts comprise a base plate 40, a slide 42
`and a clear cover plate, not shown. The base plate 40
`consists of a cutout to accept the slide 42, a slot 46 with
`locating pins 48 into which the conversion area 28,
`quantitation strip 30 and wicking strip 26 are precisely
`positioned, maintaining about a 2 mm gap 44 between
`them, and a well 50 designed to capture the released
`transport solution, e.g., wicking buffer.
`The slide 42 consists of a vented receptor site 52 into
`which the reagent 24 pad is inserted and over which the
`separation device 10 is placed. An arm 54 with dual
`shearing designed to facilitate the release of the trans-
`port solution from a pouch which is housed in a well of
`the cover plate, and asnap 56 to lock the slide in place,
`once pulled are provided. The cover plate consists of a
`well 32, which houses a sealed foil pouch (not shown)
`containing the transport solution. The cover plate has
`an orifice for placement of the separation device 10 for
`the introduction of the sample. The cover plate also
`comprises a squeegee metering bar which serves to
`control the volume of sample absorbed by the sample
`pad 24.
`The following examples are offered by way of illus-
`tration and not by way of limitation.
`EXPERIMENTAL
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Experimental Details
`Standard Curve
`
`- 1. An assay is performed by using mylar laminated
`chromatography strips containing the quantitation re-
`gion (70X 5 mm), conversion region (7X 5 mm), sample
`pad (7 x5 mm) and wicking strip (12X5 mm). The
`wicking reagent is (0.1M) MOPSO buffered (pH 7.0)
`' protein solution containing HRP (5 pg/ml). The paper
`employed for the quantitation region is 0.1 mg/ml
`MBTH paper and human serum samples equivalent to
`25, 50, 75 and 100 mg/dL of HDL were employed.
`The assay is carried out as follows:
`(a) 0.01 ml of plasma or serum is deposited on the
`sample pad; (b) wicking is initiated by allowing the
`lower portion of the assay strip to contact 0.5 ml
`wicking reagent contained in a test tube. The assay
`is complete when the wicking solution reaches the
`end of the measurement region. The strips are then
`removed and the height to which the colored band
`is formed is plotted against cholesterol concentra-
`tion. A substantially linear plot was obtained, with
`the migration height varying from about 15 mm to
`about 40 mm.
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`The assay was also performed with hydrogen perox-
`ide calibrators equivalent to 25, 50, 75 and mo mg/dL.
`The plot of migration height versus hydrogen peroxide
`incubation was substantially linear with migration
`height varying from about 22 mm to about 48 mm
`2. Gel Electrophoresis
`AccuMeter ® cassettes A (FIG. 2) (see U.S. applica-
`tion Ser. No. 353,910 filed May 18, 1989, now U.S. Pat.
`No. 4,959,) with treated and untreated membranes are
`used for this study. Filters 1, 2, membrane 3 and/or a
`
`65
`
`5,215,886
`
`8
`combination of 1, 2, 3 or all may be treated with the
`precipitating reagents.
`The assay involves the application of whole blood or
`its plasma (0.04 ml) to the sample site on the cassette.
`Following a two minute incubation the sample pad is
`removed from the cassette and its plasma contents
`squeezed out (0.005 ml) and applied to an Agarose gel.
`After the last sample has been applied to the gel, 10
`mins. are allowed for diffusion. The gel is placed into a
`Paragon electrophoresis cell and electrophoresed for 50
`ruins. at 100 volts. Upon completiOn of electrophoresis,
`the gel is removed from the Paragon electrophoresis
`cell and placed into a fixative solution for 5 mins.
`The gel is removed frbm the'fixative solution and
`dried until completely dry. The dried gel is processed in
`the following sequence:
`——-——____.___________
`Lipoprotein working stain
`5 minutes
`Dwain Solution I
`3 dips
`Desmin Solution 11
`3 dips
`Denim Solution III
`5 minutes
`——-—_____.__.___—_
`
`The gel is finally rinsed in a deionized water and then
`completely dried. Eight samples were electrophoresedr
`1 whole blood (cassette with untreated membranes; 2
`and 3 whole blood (cassette with treatedmembranes); 4
`plasma (cassette with untreated membranes); 5 and 6
`plasma (cassette with treated membranes); 7 and 8 su-
`pernatant of plasma following LDL and VLDL precip-
`itation using phosphotungstate/Mg2+. With the excep-
`tion of sample 1 and 4, using untreated cassettes which
`showed the presence of pre-B and [3 subunits, all of the
`samples only showed the presence of the a subunit.
`
`Cholesterol Analyses
`
`Cholesterol concentrations are determined following
`in situ precipitation in AccuMeter ® cassettes (FIG. 2).
`AccuMeter cassettes with treated and untreated mem-
`branes are used for this study. Filters 1, 2, membrane 3
`and/or a combination of 1, 2, 3 or all may be treated
`with the precipitating reagents. Boehringer Mannheim
`Diagnostic high performance reagent (BMDHP) is used
`to measure the plasma cholesterol collected on the sam- .
`pie pad. BMD Preciset aqueous based cholesterol cali-
`brators equivalent to 50, 100, 150, 200, and 300 mg/dL
`are used for this study.
`Whatman glass fibers GF/D(6.0 um and/or What-
`man 31ET chromatography paper were used to prepare
`treated membranes. The precipitating reagent solutions
`were prepared as follows: (1) Into deionized water (50
`ml) was dissolved 0.5 g dextran sulfate (Na salt, Mw 500
`kD), followed by the slow addition of 4.26 g anhydrous
`Mng with stirring, (2) Into 30 ml deionized water was
`dissolved 0.421 g heparin (Na salt, 176 USP units/mg)
`and 2.97 g MnClz.
`,
`The precipitating reagent (12 ml) was poured into a
`lasagne dish tilted at 45°. The membrane material (10
`cmX7 cm)’was slowly and uniformly passed through
`the reagent solution. (The GFD membrane was sup-
`ported by Nitex nylon screen of the same dimension.)
`The membrane was then dried in an oven at 80° C. for
`about 15 min being inverted occasionally for unifor-
`mity. Discs (5 mm dia.) were then cut.
`For solution phase precipitation, the dextran sulfate
`solution was prepared as described above, the heparin
`solution was twice as concentrated, and the phos-'
`photungstate/Mg2+ solution was prepared by diluting _
`
`I
`
`lnfopia Ex. 1014 pg. 8 ‘
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`$215,886
`
`10
`departing from the spirit or scope of the appended
`claims.
`
`9
`4:1 BMD-HDL-cholesterol reagent (0.55M phospho-
`tungstic acid; 25 mM MgC12) in deionized‘water.
`The assay involves the application or plasma or serum
`(0.04 ml) to the sample site on the cassette. Following a
`two minute incubation, the slide is pulled and the sam-
`pie receiving pad removed and placed in the BMDHP
`reagent (1 ml). The plasma or serum sample on the pad
`(0.005 ml) isextracted for one hour at room tempera-
`ture. The-solution is then measured at A500 nm. A
`standard curve is generated by pipetting BMD choles-
`terol calibrators (0.005 ml) into the BMDHP reagent (1
`ml), incubating for 15 mins. and then measuring the
`absorbance at 500 nm.
`
`5
`
`10'
`
`LDL and VLDL precipitation was also performed in
`test tubes using the precipitating reagents and assay 15
`protocol listed below:
`—-———g————-——_—_______
`Ppt Reagent
`.
`' Ppt Reagent Vol.
`Sample Vol.
`Phosphotungstate/
`0.5 ml
`0.2 ml
`M3011 (diluted 4:1
`in H20)
`Dextran SOMMgClz
`0.05 ml
`‘
`0.5 ml
`Heparin/MnClz
`0.05 ml
`0.5 ml
`
`
`20
`
`What is claimed is:
`l. A method of determining the amount of high den-
`sity lipoprotein-cholesterol (“HDL-cholesterol”) in a
`blood sample, said method comprising:
`passing a blood sample through a first membrane to
`remove substantially all red blood cells without
`significant lysis of said red blood cells to provide
`plasma free of red blood cells and red blood cell
`components at an assay determination interfering
`level;
`passing said plasma through a membrane system com—
`prising at least one porous filtration membrane;
`collecting and measuring said plasma on a sample
`Pad;
`bringing said sample pad in fluid transferring relation~
`ship with an eluent source strip and a quantitation
`strip, wherein at least one of said sample pad and a
`region of said quantitation strip proximal to said
`sample pad comprises non-diffusibly bound choles-
`terol esterase and cholesterol oxidase, wherein said
`quantitation strip comprises a dye forming com-
`pound capable oi‘ reacting with an oxidized cou-
`' pling compound to produce an intensely colored
`dye evenly distributed along said quantitation strip
`downstream from said cholesterol esterase and
`cholesterol oxidase;
`eluting said sample and any enzymatic reaction prod-
`uct with an eluent comprising a peroxidase and said
`coupling compound, by contacting said eluent
`source strip with said eluent;
`wherein a reagent for selectively removing very low
`density and low density lipoprotein is bound to at
`least one of said first membrane, a membrane of
`said membrane system or said sample pad, while
`_ allowing said HDL-chlolesterol
`to substantially
`quantitatively pass through said second membrane
`whereby any cholesterol in said blood is oxidized to _
`hydrogen peroxide and said coupling compound is
`enzymatically oxidized to couple with said dye
`_ forming compound to form a colored region along
`said quantitation strip of a length proportional to
`the amount of HDL-cholesterol in said blood.
`‘
`2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said mem»
`brane system comprises dextran sulfate or heparin with
`a divalent cation salt wherein said cation is magnesium
`or manganese.
`.
`y
`,
`3. A method according to claim 2, wherein said diva-
`lent cation salt is manganese chloride.
`‘
`4. A method according to claim 2, wherein said diva-
`lent cation salt is manganese chloride together with
`heparin.
`'
`‘ 5. A method according to claim 1, wherein said mem-
`brane system comprises antibodies to very

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket