throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`
`LUPIN LTD. and LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
`Patent Owner.
`
`__________________
`
`IPR2015-01097 (US Patent No. 8,754,131)
`IPR2015-01099 (US Patent No. 8,669,290)
`IPR2015-01100 (US Patent No. 8,927,606)
`IPR2015-01105 (US Patent No. 8,871,813)*
`__________________
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT LIST OF OBJECTIONS TO DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`
`* IPR2016-00089 has been joined with IPR2015-01097; IPR2016-00091
`
`has been joined with IPR2015-01100; and IPR2016-00090 has been joined with
`
`IPR2015-01105. Each of these joined proceedings includes Petitioners
`
`InnoPharma Licensing, Inc., InnoPharma Licensing LLC, InnoPharma Inc., Mylan
`
`Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Mylan Inc. (collectively, “InnoPharma”) in addition to
`
`the parties identified above.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01097; IPR2015-01099
`IPR2015-01100; IPR2015-01105
`
`Patent Owner’s Objections: Patent Owner objects to the following slides.
`
`
`
`Slides 14 and 38-39 contain arguments not supported by the citations listed on
`
`each slide or elsewhere in the record. Slide 15 mischaracterizes the cited
`
`references and uses them in a manner that is entirely unsupported by the record.
`
`Slides 26-27 improperly reference new arguments on the slides and reflect new
`
`grounds of motivation to combine that exceed the proper scope of a Reply and
`
`could have been made in the Petition, see IPR2015-01097, -01100, -01105, Paper
`
`46, IPR2015-01099, Paper 45, and should be struck, under Dell Inc. v. Acceleron,
`
`LLC, 818 F.3d 1293, 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
`
`Petitioner’s Objections: Petitioners’ object to the following slides. Slides
`
`6, 10, 12, 15-18, 25-29, 34, 35, and 58 contain arguments that are misleading
`
`and/or mischaracterize the record. Slides 16, 19, 25, and 27 contain arguments or
`
`statements that are not supported by the record. Accordingly, slides 6, 10, 12, 15-
`
`19, 25-29, 34, 35 and 58 should be struck.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON,
`FARABOW, GARRETT &
`DUNNER LLP
`
`By: /Bryan C. Diner/
`
`Bryan C. Diner, Lead Counsel
`Reg. No. 32,409
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`2
`
`Date: June 6, 2016
`
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`
`
`
`By: /Deborah Yellin/
`
`Deborah Yellin, Lead Counsel
`Reg. No. 45,904
`Counsel for Petitioners
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Joint List of
`
`Objections to Demonstratives was served on June 6, 2016, via email directed to
`
`counsel of record for the Petitioner at the following:
`
`Deborah Yellin
`dyellin@crowell.com
`
`Jonathan Lindsay
`jlindsay@crowell.com
`
`Teresa Stanek Rea
`TRea@crowell.com
`
`Chiemi Suzuki
`CSuzuki@crowell.com
`
`Shannon Lentz
`slentz@crowell.com
`
`Jitendra Malik
`jitty.malik@alston.com
`
`Bryan Skelton, Ph.D.
`Bryan.skelton@alston.com
`
`Lance Soderstrom
`Lance.soderstrom@alston.com
`
`Hitetada James Abe
`James.abe@alston.com
`
`Joseph M. Janusz
`Joe.janusz@alston.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Date: June 6, 2016
`
`
`
`/Bradley J. Moore/
`Bradley J. Moore
`Litigation Legal Assistant
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &
`Dunner, LLP

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket