throbber
Volume 10
`Number 6
`June, 1984
`
`Carcinoma associated with radioactive gold
`
`4. Boggs RF, Schmidt GD, Williams KD: Radiological
`health aspects of spent radon seeds. DREW, Radiological
`Health Data and Reports 10:185-190, 1969.
`5. Lever WF, Schaumburg-Lever G: Histopathology of the
`skin, ed. 6. Philadelphia, 1983, J. B. Lippincott Co., pp.
`214-215.
`6. Jones D, Bjamgard B, Simon N, Harley J: The application
`
`of phosphor-Teflon thermoluminescent dosimeters to the
`measurement of the dose-rate from radioactive jewelry. Br
`J Radio! 41:944-946, 1968.
`7. Baptiste MS, Rothenberg R, Nasca PC, et al: Health effects
`associated with exposure to radioactively contaminated
`gold rings. JAM ACAD DERMATOL 10:1019-1023, 1984.
`
`Adverse reactions to sulfites in drugs
`and foods
`
`Sulfites are antioxidants that are used as preser(cid:173)
`vatives in drugs and foods. Six sulfites have been
`listed as Generally Recognized and Safe (GRAS)
`by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for
`use in foods, and they are as follows: sulfur diox(cid:173)
`ide, sodium sulfite, sodium and potassium bisulfite
`and sodium and potassium metabisulfite. These
`antioxidants keep fruits and vegetables fresh look(cid:173)
`ing, and because of this feature and the current
`increased popularity of salad bars in restaurants,
`increased ingestion of sulfites has occurred.
`Metabisulfite reactions are important to der(cid:173)
`matologists because of symptoms that involve the
`skin. The predominant skin lesion is severe flush(cid:173)
`ing, but urticaria/angioedema, tingling, and pruri(cid:173)
`tus have been reported. Besides flushing, the other
`major symptoms are acute bronchospasm and hy(cid:173)
`potension-one death has been reported to the
`FDA. The onset of these symptoms after an en(cid:173)
`counter with a particular substance is critical for
`the diagnosis to be suspected. The onset is ex(cid:173)
`tremely rapid, occurring between 2 to 15 minutes,
`depending on whether the sulfite is in the form of
`an inhaler, solution, capsule, or solid food parti(cid:173)
`cle. The first two forms result in a reaction within
`2 minutes. Adverse reactions to aspirin, tartrazine,
`monosodium glutamate, and most food allergy
`occur at a significantly longer period of time,
`about 1 hour or more after ingestion.
`The recognition and acceptance of metabisulfite
`reaction appears to be taking the slow course as in
`
`the early days of discovering and accepting the
`entity of tartrazine sensitivity, which was first dis(cid:173)
`covered in 19591 and began to be accepted in
`1967. 2
`4 Similar to tartrazine, early manuscripts
`-
`dealing with metabisulfite were not accepted for
`publication in many medical journals. Finally,
`they were accepted for publication in Annals of
`Allergy, presenting a strong case for preserving
`specialty publications.
`When dissolved in an aqueous solution, sulfites
`generate so2, which may be the cause of, at least,
`some of the adverse reactions attributed to sulfi tes.
`Asthmatic patients are extremely sensitive to small
`concentrations of S02 gas and will respond with
`acute bronchospasm. 5 ' 6 The first reported case7 of
`an asthmatic patient dying of acute bronchospasm
`from S02 sensitivity probably occurred in 79 A.D.,
`at the time of the eruption of Vesuvius. It seems
`that Pliny the Elder, a known asthmatic, was in(cid:173)
`vestigating this eruption when the smell of sulfur
`in the air caused him to stand in distress, and while
`leaning on two slaves, he suddenly collapsed and
`died. The two slaves with him survived. Report(cid:173)
`edly, sulfur dioxide exceeds 20% of total active
`gases in most volcanic samples.
`The frequency of sulfite sensitivity in an asth(cid:173)
`matic population is estimated to be about 10%.
`These figures were approximated by obtaining data
`from Freedman7 and using known information
`from epidemiology studies of aspirin and tartra(cid:173)
`zine. Freedman investigated 272 asthmatic patients
`1077
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2322
`LUPIN v. SENJU
`IPR2015-01105
`
`

`
`1078 Settipane
`
`Journal of the
`American Academy of
`Dermatology
`
`Table I. Reports of bisulfite reactions (adults)*
`
`Investigators
`
`Prenner and Stevens9
`Freedman7
`Stevenson and
`Simonw
`Werth11
`Twarog and Leung12
`Schwartz13
`Habenicht et aF4
`
`Year
`
`1976
`1977
`1981
`
`1982
`1982
`1983
`1983
`
`Patients
`
`Type
`
`No. I
`1
`Normal
`Asthmatics
`8
`Asthmatics
`4
`
`1
`1
`2
`2
`
`Asthmatic
`Asthmatic
`Asthmatics
`Normals
`
`Positive
`bisulfite
`oral challenge
`
`Symptom
`onset
`(min)
`
`Positive
`bisulfite
`skin test
`
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes
`Yes (1)
`
`Few
`1-2
`10-15
`
`2
`2
`10
`15
`
`Yes
`ND
`Neg
`
`ND
`Yes
`Neg
`ND
`
`Remarks
`
`Pas P-K
`Pas smog
`Pas smog
`
`Pos smog
`Neg P-K
`
`ND: Not done; P-K: Prausnitz-Kiistner reaction.
`*From Settipane GA: N Eng! Reg Allergy Proc 4:304, 1983.
`
`and reported that thirty had adverse reactions to a
`soft drink that contained both tartrazine and sul(cid:173)
`fi tes. Since approximately 10% of asthmatics have
`aspirin intolerance and about 10% of this subgroup
`also have tartrazine sensitivity, the extrapolation of
`these figures results in the approximation that
`twenty-seven ( 10%) of Freedman's 272 asthmatics
`had adverse reactions to sulfites. A recent report8
`stated that 8.2% of asthmatic patients without a
`suggestive history had positive metabisulfite chal(cid:173)
`lenges.
`In the modern literature in which a positive
`challenge was used to establish the diagnosis,
`Prenner and Stevensu were the first to report, in
`1976, that bisulfite caused a severe adverse reac(cid:173)
`tion in an asthmatic patient. In 1977, Freedman7
`reported that eight asthmatic patients had severe
`reactions to bisulfites. In 1981, Stevenson and
`Simon10 reported four bisulfite cases, followed by
`other reports in rapid succession: Werth, 11 Twarog
`and Leung, 12 Schwartz, 1a and Habenicht et al 14
`(Table I).
`Although the FDA has received reports of over
`ninety cases of adverse reactions, only about one
`third of these cases have been published in the
`medical literature. Most of the patients reported in
`the medical literature had a prior history of
`asthma. All had a positive oral challenge to bisul(cid:173)
`fite, and all had reactions within 15 minutes from
`challenge. In only two of these reports, positive
`skin tests to bisulfite were found.
`One of these reports also demonstrated a posi-
`
`tive Prausnitz-Kustner (P-K) reaction, while the
`other report stated that the P-K reaction was nega(cid:173)
`tive. In four reports, asthmatic patients not only
`reacted to bisulfites in foods, but also reacted to
`inhaled bisulfites or to smog (S02 ), demonstrating
`the strong relationship between bisulfites and so2.
`It is apparent that a significant number of these
`asthmatics with bisulfite sensitivity have negative
`allergy skin tests and, therefore, are nonatopic in
`nature. 10•12 The lack of IgE mechanism is con(cid:173)
`firmed by the finding that normal IgE, total eosin(cid:173)
`ophil count, and histamine levels were observed
`during acute reactions. 12
`The pathogenic mechanism of bisulfite reaction
`appears to be through neural reflex actions, involv(cid:173)
`ing the irritant receptors in the nose and upper
`airways, with the vagus nerve being the main ef(cid:173)
`ferent pathway. Atropine inhibits the broncho(cid:173)
`spasm induced by S02 •5•6 Stimulation of the
`parasympathetic system may also account for
`pruritus, urticaria/angioedema, as well as gastro(cid:173)
`intestinal and cardiovascular complaints. The
`rapid onset of symptoms and absent allergic
`markers add credence to this neurogenic theory.
`Freedman/ Stevenson and Simon, 10 and Werth"
`also have mentioned this reflex action as a possible
`mechanism among other theories. An overall view
`of all reports appears to make the neurogenic
`theory the most likely mechanism.
`A major aim of this editorial is to list medica(cid:173)
`tions that contain the preservative bisulfite (Table
`II). Most of these medications were obtained by
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`
`Volume 10
`Number 6
`June, 1984
`
`Table II. Drugs that contain sulfites
`
`I. Bronchodilator inhalant solutions
`Alupent (metaproterenol sulfate)
`Bronkephrine (ethylnorepinephrine HCl)
`Bronkosol (isoetharine HCl)
`Isuprel hydrochloride solution (isoproterenol HCl)
`Metaprel (metaproterenol sulfate)
`Micronefrin (racemic epinephrine)
`Il. Tablets
`Isuprel HCl Glossets (isoproterenol HCI)
`ill. Injectables
`A. Adrenalin II 1 , 000 (epinephrine)
`Aldomet Esther HCl injection (methyldopate
`HCl, MSD)
`Aramine (metaraminol bitartrate)
`Celestone phosphate (brand of metamethasone
`sodium)
`Compazine (prochlorperazine)
`Decadron-LA suspension (dexamethasone
`acetate)
`Decadron phosphate injection (dexamethasone
`sodium phosphate)
`Decadron phosphate with Xylocaine (dexa(cid:173)
`methasone sodium phosphate and lidocaine
`HCl)
`Dopastat (dopamine HCl)
`Intropin (dopamine HCl)
`Isuprel HCI sterile injection 1 :5,000 (isopro-
`terenol HCl)
`Largon (propiomazine HCl)
`Levophed bitartrate (norepinephrine bitartrate)
`Levoprome (methotrimeprazine)
`Lidocaine HCl with epinephrine
`Marcaine HCl with epinephrine (bupivacaine

`HCl and epinephrine)
`Mepergan (meperidine and promethazine HCl)
`Nesacaine (chloroprocaine HCl)
`Nesacaine-CE (chloroprocaine HCl)
`Novocaine (procaine HCl injection '[U.S.P.])
`
`Adverse reactions to suljites 1079
`
`Nubain (nalbuphine HCl)
`Phenergan (promethazine HCl)
`Pronestyl (procainamide HCl)
`Reglan (metoclopramide HCl)
`Serpasil (reserpine USP)
`Thorazine (chlorpromazine HCl)
`Tofranil (imipramine HCl [U.S.P.])
`Torecan (brand of thiethylperazine [U.S.P.])
`10% Travasol (amino acid) injection without
`electrolytes
`Trilafon (brand of perphenazine [U.S.P.])
`Tubocurarine chloride injection (U.S.P.)
`Yutopar (ritodrine HCl)
`B. Antibiotics
`Amikin ( amikacin sulfate)
`Bactrim IV infusion (trimethoprim and sulfa-
`methoxazole)
`Bristagen (gentamicin sulfate)
`Gantrisin (sulfisoxazole)
`Garamycin injectable (gentamicin sulfate)
`Kantrex injection (kanamycin sulfate injec-
`tion)
`Nebcin (tobramycin sulfate)
`Septra IV infusion
`IV. Miscellaneous
`Cortisporin otic solution (polymyxin B-neomycin(cid:173)
`hydrocortisone)
`Decadron in ocumeter (dexamethasone sodium
`phosphate)
`Decadron phosphate-0.1% sterile ophthalmic
`solution (dexamethasone sodium phosphate)
`Neodecadron sterile ophthalmic solution (neomy-
`cin sulfate-dexamethasone sodium phosphate)
`Otocort ear drops
`Pred-forte ophthalmic suspension
`Pred-mild ophthalmic suspension
`Propine ophthalmic solution (dipivefrin HCl)
`
`our review of Physicians' Desk Reference, and
`some were obtained from published reports. *· 12
`•15
`These medications should be used with caution in
`asthmatic patients and should not be used in those
`with a known history of sulfite or S02 sensitivity.
`Foods that contain bisulfite have been ade(cid:173)
`quately described by Twarog16 and others .10-
`14
`•17
`These foods are listed in Table III. It has been
`estimated that the average U.S. diet contains about
`2 to 3 mg of sulfite daily. However, a restaurant
`
`*Washington Drug Letter, April 4, 1983.
`
`meal may contain 20 to 200 mg of sulfites as pre(cid:173)
`servatives.
`Besides avoidance, preventive treatment for
`these sulfite-sensitive patients is based on a recent
`report by Jacobsen, Simon, and Singh. 18 They
`demonstrated that these patients have a deficiency
`of the enzyme sulfite oxidase. Also, they reported
`that cyanocobalamin (vitamin B 12) can serve as an
`extracellular, nonenzymatic catalyst for the oxi(cid:173)
`dation of sulfites in these deficient individuals.
`When given as an oral dose of 1 to 5 mg preceding
`sulfite challenge, vitamin B12 offers excellent pro-
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`
`1080 Settipane
`
`Table Ill. Sulfites in foods
`
`Restaurant salads and fresh fruits
`Vegetables wrapped in cellophane
`Dried fruits (e.g. , apricots)
`Potato (e.g., French fries and potato chips)
`Avocados
`Wine and vinegar
`Beer
`Cider
`Some fruit drinks (especially outside U.S.A.)
`Baked products
`Gelatin
`Beet sugar
`Com sweeteners
`Food starches
`Shrimp
`Sausage meats (outside U.S.A.)
`
`tection to these patients. Other drugs that are able
`to prevent clinical sulfite reactions as shown in
`challenge studies are atropine, cromolyn, and
`d<Yx.epin .w
`The FDA and state health departments have ini(cid:173)
`tiated steps in alerting consumers to the possible
`dangers of bisulfites and in getting producers to
`identify these chemicals in their packages. How(cid:173)
`ever, bureaucratic processes are slow, and it is up
`to the physician to demonstrate leadership in pre(cid:173)
`scribing medications and educating patients. 20
`
`Guy A. Settipane, M.D.
`Clinical Associate Professor, Brown University
`and the Department of Medicine,
`Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rl
`
`REFERENCES
`I. Lockey SD: Allergic reactions due to FD and C yellow
`No. 5, tartrazine, and aniline dye used as a coloring and
`identify1ng agent in various steroids. Ann Allergy 17:
`719-721, 1959.
`2. Chafee FH, Settipane GA: Asthma caused by FD & C
`approved dyes. J Allergy 40:65-72, 1967.
`
`Journal of the
`American Academy of
`Dermatology
`
`3. Samter M, Beers RE Jr: Concerning the nature of intoler(cid:173)
`ance to aspirin. J Allergy 40:281-293, 1967.
`4. Settipane GA, editor: National Symposium on Aspirin
`and Endogenous Mediators of Disease. Proceedings of
`the New England Society of Allergy, vol. 2, pp. 54-107,
`1981.
`5. Boushey HA: Bronchial hyperreactivity to sulfur diox(cid:173)
`ide: Physiologic and political implications. J Allergy
`Clin Immunol 69:335-338, 1982.
`6. Sheppard D, Wong WS, Vehara CF, et al: Lower
`threshold and greater bronchomotor responsiveness of
`asthmatic subjects to sulfur dioxide. Am Rev Respir Dis
`122:873-878, 1980.
`7. Freedman BJ: Asthma induced by sulfur dioxide, ben(cid:173)
`zoate and tartrazine contained in orange drinks. CJin Al(cid:173)
`lergy 7:407-415, 1977.
`8. Simon RA, Green L, Stevenson DD: The incidence of
`ingested metabisulfite sensitivity in an asthmatic popula(cid:173)
`tion. J Allergy Clin Immunol 69:118, 1982. (Abst.)
`9. Prenner BM, Stevens JJ: Anaphylaxis after ingestion of
`sodium bisulfite. Ann Allergy 37:180-182, 1976.
`10. Stevenson DD, Simon RA: Sensitivity
`to
`ingested
`metabisulfites in asthma subjects. J Allergy Clin lmmu(cid:173)
`nol 68:26-32, 1981.
`11. Werth GR: Inhaled metabisulfite sensitivity. J Allergy
`Clin Immunol 70:143, 1982. (Letter to Editor.)
`12. Twarog FJ, Leung DYM: Anaphylaxis to a component of
`isoetharine (sodium bisulfite). JAMA 248:2030-2031,
`1982.
`to
`13. Schwartz HF: Sensitivity
`ingested metabisultlte:
`Variations in clinical presentation. J Allergy Clin lmmu(cid:173)
`nol 71:487-489, 1983.
`14. Habenicht HA, Preuss L, Lovell RG: Sensitivity to in(cid:173)
`gested metabisulfites: Cause of bronchospasm and ur(cid:173)
`ticaria. Immunol Allergy Pract 5:243-245, 1983.
`15. Keopke JW, Selner JC, Dunhill AL: Presence of sulfur
`dioxide in commonly used bronchodilator solutions. J
`Allergy Clin Immunol 72:504-508, 1983.
`16. Twarog FJ: Metabisulfite sensitivity in asthma: A re(cid:173)
`view. N Eng! Reg Allergy Proc 4: 100-103, 1983.
`17. Editorial. Sulfites in foods and drugs. FDA Drug Bull
`13(2):11-12, 1983.
`18. Jacobsen DW, Simon RA, Singh M: Sulfite oxidase
`deficiency and cobalamin protection in sulfite-sensitive
`asthmatics (SSA). J Allergy Clin Immunol 73:135,
`1984. (Abst.)
`19. Simon R. Goldfarb G, Jacobsen D: Blocking studies in
`sulfite sensitive asthmatics (SSA). J Allergy Clin Immu(cid:173)
`nol 73:136, 1984. (Abst.)
`20. Settipane GA: Metabisulfite in drugs. N Eng! Reg Al(cid:173)
`lergy Proc 4:304-306, 1983.
`
`Page 4 of 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket