throbber
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS
`Committee on Drugs
`
`“Inactive” Ingredients in Pharmaceutical Products: Update
`(Subject Review)
`
`ABSTRACT. Because of an increasing number of re-
`ports of adverse reactions associated with pharmaceutical
`excipients, in 1985 the Committee on Drugs issued a
`position statement1 recommending that the Food and
`Drug Administration mandate labeling of over-the-
`counter and prescription formulations to include a qual-
`itative list of inactive ingredients. However, labeling of
`inactive ingredients remains voluntary. Adverse reac-
`tions continue to be reported, although some are no
`longer considered clinically significant, and other new
`reactions have emerged. The original statement, there-
`fore, has been updated and its information expanded.
`
`ABBREVIATIONS. FDA, Food and Drug Administration; MDIs,
`metered-dose inhalers
`
`Pharmaceutical products often contain agents that
`have a variety of purposes, including improvement
`of the appearance, bioavailability, stability, and pal-
`atability of
`the product. Excipients (substances
`added to confer a suitable consistency or form to a
`drug, such as the vehicle, preservatives, or stabiliz-
`ers) frequently make up the majority of the mass or
`volume of oral and parenteral drug products. These
`pharmaceutical adjuvants are usually considered to
`be inert and do not add to or affect the intended
`action of the therapeutically active ingredients.
`Some 773 chemical agents have been approved by
`the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as
`inactive ingredients in drug products.2 Inasmuch as
`these compounds are classified as “inactive,” no reg-
`ulatory statutes require listing on product labeling.
`Pharmacopeial guidelines, enforceable under the
`Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, do require labeling of
`inactive ingredients for topical, ophthalmic, and par-
`enteral preparations; orally administered products
`are currently exempt. Because of pressure from pro-
`fessional and consumer organizations asking the
`FDA to require complete disclosure of all ingredi-
`ents, voluntary labeling was adopted by the two
`major pharmaceutical
`industry trade associations.
`These voluntary guidelines contain an exemption for
`“trade secret” components and do not require com-
`plete disclosure of all fragrance and flavoring ingre-
`dients.
`Current problems encountered with “inactive” in-
`gredients include benzalkonium chloride-induced
`
`The recommendations in this statement do not indicate an exclusive course
`of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into
`account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.
`PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 1997 by the American Acad-
`emy of Pediatrics.
`
`bronchospasm from antiasthmatic drugs, aspartame-
`induced headache and seizures, saccharin-induced
`cross-sensitivity reactions in children with sulfon-
`amide allergy, benzyl alcohol toxicity in neonates
`receiving high-dose continuous infusion with pre-
`served medications, dye-related cross-reactions in
`children with aspirin intolerance, lactose-induced di-
`arrhea, and propylene glycol-induced hyperosmola-
`lity and lactic acidosis. Although many other excipi-
`ents have been implicated in causing adverse
`reactions, these are the most significant in the pedi-
`atric population.
`
`ANTIASTHMATIC MEDICATIONS
`It is readily appreciated that some percentage of
`asthmatic children will develop a “paradoxical”
`bronchospasm after they inhale their medication. Be-
`cause many of these reactions were attributed to
`sulfite, which had been highly publicized as a caus-
`ative agent, it was often first suspected. During the
`past 10 years, however, the active ingredient in sul-
`fite-containing preparations, the nonselective b
`2-ago-
`nists isoproterenol, isoetharine, and metaproterenol,
`have been replaced as drugs of choice by more se-
`lective agents, primarily albuterol, that do not con-
`tain sulfites. Paradoxical reactions continue to be
`reported, in some cases resulting in product refor-
`mulation because of excessive adverse reactions. In-
`active ingredients that have been implicated in caus-
`ing these reactions include benzalkonium chloride,
`oleic acid, chlorofluorocarbons, soya lecithin, and
`sorbitan trioleate.
`
`Sulfites
`Sulfiting agents are widely used as antioxidants.
`Six sulfite compounds (sulfur dioxide, sodium sul-
`fite, sodium bisulfite, potassium bisulfite, sodium
`metabisulfite, and potassium metabisulfite) have
`been categorized as “Generally Recognized as Safe”
`for use in foods and drugs. This status was revoked
`for raw fruits and vegetables (excluding potatoes) in
`1986 after the FDA received reports of more than 250
`cases of adverse reactions, including six deaths asso-
`ciated with the ingestion of sulfites in foods.3,4 Al-
`though primary exposure in children is through
`foods, serious reactions have also occurred after oral,
`inhalational, parenteral, and ophthalmic administra-
`tion of sulfite-containing drugs.
`Signs and symptoms most frequently reported in-
`clude wheezing, dyspnea, and chest tightness in pa-
`tients with known reactive airway disease.5–9 Nonim-
`munologic
`anaphylactoid reactions have
`also
`
`268
`
`PEDIATRICS Vol. 99 No. 2 February 1997
`Downloaded from
`pediatrics.aappublications.org
`
` by guest on May 11, 2015
`
`Page 1 of 13
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2320
`LUPIN v. SENJU
`IPR2015-01105
`
`

`
`occurred.7,8,10,11 Reactions to sulfites rarely occur in
`patients without reactive airway disease.12 Met-
`abisulfite hypersensitivity was demonstrated in 19
`(66%) of 29 children with a history of chronic mod-
`erately severe asthma.13 The incidence of sulfite sen-
`sitivity increases with age in severely asthmatic chil-
`dren (31% of children up to 10 years of age and 71%
`of older children).14
`The presence of sulfites in antiasthmatic medica-
`tions has been a concern, but many of these medica-
`tions have been reformulated or replaced in clinical
`practice by more b-selective agents, which do not
`contain sulfites. Metered-dose aerosol bronchodila-
`tors do not contain sulfites. Nonsulfite-containing
`products used to treat asthma are presented in Table
`1. Parenteral drugs, such as corticosteroids, amin-
`oglycosides, and epinephrine, may contain sulfites
`(Table 2) but rarely produce reactions because of the
`small amounts present. Patients who react to oral
`challenges with small amounts (5 to 10 mg) are at
`risk for similar reactions from these parenteral
`agents.15 Local dermal reactions accompanied by eo-
`
`Some Medications Used by Asthmatics That Do
`TABLE 1.
`Not Contain Sulfites
`Brand Name*
`
`Manufacturer
`
`Forest
`Aerobid inhaler
`Adams
`Airet solution
`Boehringer Ingelheim
`Alupent aerosol
`Boehringer Ingelheim
`Alupent solution 5%*
`Alupent solution Unit-dose 0.4, 0.6% Boehringer Ingelheim
`Alupent syrup
`Boehringer Ingelheim
`Alupent tablets
`Boehringer Ingelheim
`Atrovent aerosol
`Boehringer Ingelheim
`Azmacort
`Rhone-Poulenc Rorer
`Beclovent inhaler
`Glaxo
`Brethine injection
`Ciba-Geigy
`Brethine tablets
`Ciba-Geigy
`Bricanyl injection
`Marion Merrell Dow
`Bronkaid Mist aerosol
`Sterling-Winthrop
`Bronkometer aerosol
`Sterling-Winthrop
`Celestone injection*
`Schering
`Decadron respihaler
`Merck
`Duo-Medihaler aerosol
`3M
`Elixophyllin elixir
`Forest
`Intal capsules, solution, inhaler
`Fisons
`Isoetharine solution
`Astra
`Isoetharine solution
`Dey
`Isuprel Mistometer
`Winthrop-Breon
`Maxair autohaler
`3M
`Medihaler-Epi aerosol
`3M
`Medihaler-Iso aerosol
`3M
`Metaprel aerosol
`Sandoz
`Metaprel solution 5%*
`Sandoz
`Primatene Mist suspension aerosol
`Whitehall
`Primatene Mist solution aerosol
`Whitehall
`Proventil aerosol
`Schering
`Proventil solution 0.5%*
`Schering
`Quibron tablet, capsule
`Bristol-Myers Squibb
`Sus-Phrine injection
`Forest
`Theo-Dur sprinkle, tablets
`Key
`Tilade inhaler
`Fisons
`Tornalate inhaler
`Sterling Winthrop
`Tornalate solution
`Sterling Winthrop
`Vanceril inhaler
`Schering
`Ventolin aerosol
`Glaxo
`Ventolin nebules solution 0.083%
`Glaxo
`Ventolin solution 0.5%*
`Glaxo
`Ventolin rotacaps, syrup, tablets
`Glaxo
`* Contains benzalkonium chloride.
`
`TABLE 2.
`Asthmatics
`
`Some Sulfite-containing Medications Used by
`
`Brand Name
`
`Adrenalin Chloride 1:100
`Adrenalin injection 1:1000
`Amikin injection
`Arm-a-Med isoetharine solution
`AsthmaNefrin
`Beta 2 isoetharine solution
`Bronkosol solution
`Dey-dose epinephrine
`Dey-dose isoetharine solution
`Dispos-a-Med isoetharine
`Epipen/Epipen Jr
`Garamycin injection (all but intravenous
`piggyback and intrathecal)
`Isoetharine hydrochloride
`Isuprel injection
`Isuprel solution
`MicroNefrin
`Minocin syrup
`Nebcin injection
`Netromycin injection
`
`Manufacturer
`
`Parke-Davis
`Parke-Davis
`Apothecon
`Armour
`Menley & James
`Nephron
`Sanofi-Winthrop
`Dey
`Dey
`Parke-Davis
`Center
`Schering
`
`Roxane
`Sanofi-Winthrop
`Sanofi-Winthrop
`Bird
`Lederle
`Lilly
`Schering
`
`sinophilia have been reported after continuous infu-
`sion with dobutamine.16 Sulfite-preserved amino ac-
`ids contained in most mixtures of total parenteral
`nutrition are a less commonly appreciated source.
`Nevertheless,
`life-threatening situations requiring
`the administration of epinephrine should be treated
`with sulfite-preserved epinephrine if no preserva-
`tive-free product is available, even in very sensitive
`patients. The diagnosis of sulfite sensitivity is made
`by history and through challenge testing.7 Avoidance
`of foods containing sulfites through careful reading
`of packaged food labels and inquiry at restaurants as
`to the use of agents that contain sulfites may prevent
`reactions. A commercial sulfite-detection strip was
`found to be unreliable, especially when used on
`acidic foods or foods removed from their original
`containers.17 Drug manufacturers must disclose the
`presence of sulfites in product labeling.
`
`Benzalkonium Chloride
`Benzalkonium chloride is a commonly used bacte-
`ricidal preservative in albuterol and metaproterenol
`nebulizer solutions in the United States and in be-
`clomethasone and ipratropium bromide nebulizer
`solutions in other countries. Inhalation of pure ben-
`zalkonium chloride causes
`reproducible, dose-
`related, cumulative bronchoconstriction, with a
`rapid onset and prolonged duration compared with
`sulfites. It is frequently accompanied by a cough and
`burning sensation and, occasionally, by facial flush-
`ing and pruritus. Bronchoconstriction is inhibited by
`concurrent treatment or pretreatment with b
`2-ago-
`nists and cromolyn sodium and partially by hista-
`mine1 antagonists.18–20 The mechanism appears to be
`non-IgE-mediated release of mast cell mediators,
`with atopic patients being more susceptible.21
`Because the reaction is dose-related and cumula-
`tive and may be masked by the active agent in many
`patients, few clear-cut cases of paradoxical broncho-
`constriction have been attributed to benzalkonium,
`primarily in patients using more than one agent con-
`taining this excipient or in those receiving frequent
`
`Downloaded from
`
`AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS
`
` by guest on May 11, 2015pediatrics.aappublications.org
`
`269
`
`Page 2 of 13
`
`

`
`dosing.22–26 Unit-dose vials deliver five times as much
`benzalkonium as the same dose given from a multi-
`ple-dose vial, which resulted in one case of broncho-
`constriction.26 Other potential sources of benzalko-
`nium in children with asthma and concurrent
`sinusitis include nasal saline, nasal corticosteroid,
`and nasal decongestant solutions.
`In several studies of adult asthmatics, the lowest
`dose of pure benzalkonium chloride that produced a
`20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec-
`ond ranged from 124 to 159 mg. Albuterol (from a
`multidose vial) contains 50 mg per 0.5 mL of solu-
`tion18,19; thus, a single dose is unlikely to cause a
`reaction. Even in patients without overt deterioration
`after the use of benzalkonium-preserved antiasth-
`matic agents, some evidence exists that benzalkoni-
`um-free solutions may have improved efficacy.21,27
`Thus, although the presence of benzalkonium prob-
`ably has a minimal effect in most patients using
`single, infrequent doses of a preserved bronchodila-
`tor, development of a unit-dose, nonpreserved prep-
`aration may significantly benefit the severely ill,
`hospitalized patient in whom disease-related deteri-
`oration in pulmonary function may be difficult to
`distinguish from preservative toxicity.
`
`Metered-dose Inhalers (MDIs)
`Paradoxical bronchoconstriction has been reported
`in up to 6.9% of asthmatic patients after inhalation of
`pure MDI vehicle.28 When combined with an active
`ingredient, this incidence decreases to approximately
`1.5% to 4%.29 Most studies of MDI-related broncho-
`constriction have been confounded by the lack of
`testing of individual vehicle components, inherent
`irritability of some active ingredients (corticoste-
`roids), or concurrent use of potent active ingredients
`(bronchodilators).
`Inactive ingredients that have
`been implicated in the deterioration of pulmonary
`function attributable to hypersensitivity or irritant
`effects include chlorofluorocarbons,30–33 sorbitan tri-
`oleate,30,34 oleic acid,28,35 and soya lecithin (H. G.
`Wilms, written communication, October 27, 1989).28,36
`One metaproterenol product, reformulated to con-
`tain soya lecithin, was withdrawn from the market
`after 1 month because of escalating reports of cough-
`ing, gagging, and asthma exacerbation (H. G. Wilms,
`written communication, October 27, 1989).
`
`ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS
`
`Aspartame
`Aspartame, a dipeptide of aspartic acid and a
`methyl ester of phenylalanine, is approved for use in
`pharmaceutical products and is being used increas-
`ingly in chewable tablet and sugar-free formulations.
`Labels for both prescription and nonprescription
`products must include the phenylalanine content.
`The major consideration in the use of aspartame in
`children is in patients with autosomal recessive phe-
`nylketonuria. Although heterozygotes do not appear
`to have clinically significant increases in phenylala-
`nine after ingestion of even large amounts (equiva-
`lent to 24 12-oz cans of diet beverages), homozygotes
`with strict dietary restrictions should avoid aspar-
`
`tame. Children without dietary restrictions could
`safely ingest 10 mg/kg/d.37–40 Dietary consumption
`of aspartame is typically less than 5 mg/kg/d41;
`young children, however, could ingest considerably
`more. For example, a 2-year-old child weighing 12 kg
`consumes 17 mg/kg from drinking one 12-oz can of
`diet soda and one serving of a sweetened product
`(eg, cereal, pudding, gelatin, or frozen dessert).42
`Headache is the most common adverse effect at-
`tributed to aspartame but is seldom confirmed by
`single-dose double-blind challenge. Up to 11% of
`patients with chronic migraine headaches reported
`headaches triggered by aspartame43; however, a dou-
`ble-blind challenge with three doses of 10 mg/kg
`given every 2 hours triggered no more headaches
`than did placebos in patients with vascular head-
`aches believed to be exacerbated by aspartame.44 A
`small, double-blind 4-week trial showed an increase
`in frequency of headaches after ingestion of 1200
`mg/d, indicating that a longer challenge period may
`be necessary.45
`In anecdotal reports, aspartame has been linked to
`various neuropsychiatric disorders, including panic
`attacks, mood changes, visual hallucinations, manic
`episodes, and isolated dizziness.46–49 A small, dou-
`ble-blind crossover study of patients with major de-
`pression revealed a higher incidence of reactions in
`these patients compared with nondepressed volun-
`teers after administration of 30 mg/kg for 7 days;
`symptoms included headache, nervousness, dizzi-
`ness, memory impairment, nausea,
`temper out-
`bursts, and depression.50 None of these conditions
`has been rigorously proven to be caused by aspar-
`tame, but carefully conducted double-blind chal-
`lenges may be indicated in patients with histories
`that suggest aspartame as a cause. Patients with un-
`derlying mitral valve prolapse or affective disorders
`may be at increased risk for neuropsychiatric ef-
`fects51; several studies have shown that individuals
`without psychiatric or seizure disorders do not dem-
`onstrate these effects.50,52
`Seizures have been reported via passive surveil-
`lance data collected by the FDA and in a few case
`reports.47,48,53 A recent analysis of FDA reports
`showed 41 cases of rechallenge with a temporal re-
`lationship to aspartame consumption. Most seizures
`occurred in patients who had an acceptable dietary
`intake, except for a 16-year-old who ingested up to
`57 mg/kg of aspartame.54 Aspartame is generally
`considered safe for children with epilepsy. One
`study found increased spike-wave discharges in chil-
`dren with untreated absence seizures after a high
`dose of aspartame and suggested that children with
`poorly controlled absence seizures avoid aspar-
`tame.55
`Several studies have shown no relationship be-
`tween aspartame and aggressive or hyperactive be-
`haviors or cognitive function in children; thus, chil-
`dren with attention deficit disorder, with or without
`hyperactivity,56,57 do not need to avoid this sweet-
`ener.
`Isolated confirmed hypersensitivity reactions re-
`sulting from ingestion of aspartame have been re-
`ported, including two patients who developed sub-
`
`270
`
`“INACTIVE” INGREDIENTS IN PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
`Downloaded from
`pediatrics.aappublications.org
` by guest on May 11, 2015
`
`Page 3 of 13
`
`

`
`TABLE 3.
`
`Parenteral Medications That Contain Benzyl Alcohol
`Drug
`Benzyl Alcohol
`Content, %
`
`Estimated Average Daily Intake
`of Benzyl Alcohol in Infants
`
`Aminophylline
`Aquamephyton neonatal injection
`Ativan injection
`Bacteriostatic saline
`Bacteriostatic water
`Dexamethasone injection
`Dopram
`Folate sodium
`Heparin injection (1000 U/mL)
`Multivitamin infusion
`Netromycin injection*
`Norcuron with supplied diluent
`Pavulon injection
`Tracrium multidose vial
`Vasotec injection
`* Netromycin neonatal injection does not contain benzyl alcohol.
`
`2.0
`0.9
`2.0
`1.5
`1.5
`1.0
`0.9
`1.5
`1.0
`0.9
`1.0
`0.9
`1.0
`0.9
`0.9
`
`2–4 mg/kg
`4.5 mg
`0.4–1 mg/kg
`99–234 mg/kg
`99–234 mg/kg
`2.5 mg
`21.6–32.4 mg/kg
`0.6–0.9 mg
`1.2 mg
`45 mg
`0.4–0.65 mg/kg
`0.4 mg/kg
`2–3 mg/kg
`3.6 mg/kg
`0.1–0.5 mg/kg
`
`resembling
`cutaneous nodules or granulomas
`erythema nodosum.58,59 Other reported reactions in-
`clude orofacial granulomatosis, erythema, pruritus,
`urticaria, and angioedema.60–62 A meticulous workup
`with double-blind challenge usually fails to confirm
`the purported reaction; hypersensitivity reactions
`appear to be rare.63,64 These reactions may be related
`to breakdown products formed during the storage of
`liquid products, such as diketopiperazine deriva-
`tives, especially after exposures to higher tempera-
`tures.62 If so, rechallenge with fresh encapsulated
`powder could produce a false-negative reaction.
`
`Saccharin
`Many oral drugs, including both solid and liquid
`dosage forms, contain saccharin as a sweetening
`agent. Saccharin is not included in drug labeling. The
`most frequent use of saccharin is in foods and bev-
`erages, accounting for 70% of the total consumption.
`A British survey found that conventional soft drinks
`were the predominant source of saccharin in children
`aged 2 to 9 years, replaced by diet soft drinks in
`adolescents. The median intake of saccharin was 0.2
`to 0.9 mg/kg/d in the general population and 0.6 to
`2.3 mg/kg/d in diabetics.65 Foods containing saccha-
`rin must carry a label stating that the “use of this
`product may be hazardous to your health . . . con-
`tains saccharin which has been determined to cause
`cancer in laboratory animals.”
`Saccharin may be present in drugs in substantial
`amounts. Ingestion of the recommended daily dos-
`age of chewable aspirin or acetaminophen tablets in
`a school-age child would provide approximately the
`same amount of saccharin contained in one can of a
`diet soft drink. This amount, relative to the body
`weight of a child younger than 9 or 10 years, ingested
`for prolonged periods would be considered as
`“heavy use,” as defined in a major large-scale FDA/
`National Cancer Institute epidemiologic study.66 In
`this study, heavy use of artificial sweeteners was
`associated with a significantly increased risk for the
`development of bladder cancer. An independent re-
`view of this study concluded that there was no as-
`sociation.67 An investigation of saccharin performed
`by the American Medical Association in 1985 con-
`
`cluded that bladder changes were species-specific,
`were confined to the second generation of male rats,
`and occurred in association with large doses (equiv-
`alent to several hundred cans of diet soft drink per
`day). The no-effect level was equivalent to 500 mg/
`kg/d.68,69 Saccharin is not genotoxic; the presumed
`mechanism of toxicity is the binding of saccharin to
`urinary proteins (not normally found in humans),
`creating a nidus for the formation of silicate crystals,
`which are cytotoxic to bladder epithelium.70
`Saccharin is an o-toluene sulfonamide derivative
`and causes similar dermatologic reactions. Cross-
`sensitivity with sulfonamides has been demonstrat-
`ed; therefore, children with “sulfa” allergy should
`also avoid saccharin. Hypersensitivity can usually be
`confirmed by a radioallergosorbent test for saccha-
`rin.71 In a series of 42 patients with adverse effects
`resulting from consumption of saccharin in pharma-
`ceutical agents, pruritus and urticaria were the most
`common reactions, followed by eczema, photosensi-
`tivity, and prurigo.72 Other reactions include wheez-
`ing, nausea, diarrhea, tongue blisters, tachycardia,
`fixed eruptions, headache, diuresis, and sensory
`neuropathy.73–77
`Ingestion of saccharin-adulterated milk formula by
`infants was associated with irritability, hypertonia,
`insomnia, opisthotonos, and strabismus, which re-
`solved within 36 hours after ingestion. Two anec-
`dotal reports of an accidental overdose in an adult
`and a child discussed reactions of generalized
`edema, oliguria, and persistent albuminuria.75 Be-
`cause of the paucity of data on the toxicity of saccha-
`rin in children, the American Medical Association
`has recommended limiting the intake of saccharin in
`young children and pregnant women.68
`
`BENZYL ALCOHOL
`Benzyl alcohol is commonly used as a preservative
`in many injectable drugs and solutions. A number of
`neonatal deaths and severe respiratory and meta-
`bolic complications in low-birth-weight premature
`infants have been associated with use of this agent in
`bacteriostatic saline intravascular flush and endotra-
`cheal tube lavage solutions.78–80 In a controlled study,
`intraventricular hemorrhage, metabolic acidosis, and
`
`Downloaded from
`
`AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS
`
` by guest on May 11, 2015pediatrics.aappublications.org
`
`271
`
`Page 4 of 13
`
`

`
`TABLE 4.
`
`Examples of Dye-free Orally Administered Liquid Medications
`Classification and Product
`(Manufacturer)
`
`Active Ingredients (per 5 mL Unless
`Otherwise Indicated)
`
`Analgesics
`Demerol (Sanofi Winthrop)
`Indomethacin (Roxane)
`Meperidine* (Roxane)
`Methadone Intensol* (Roxane)
`Opium tincture (Lilly)
`Rescudose* (Roxane)
`Roxanol* (Roxane)
`Roxanol* (Roxane)
`Roxicodone Intensol* (Roxane)
`Antibiotics/anti-infective
`Furoxone (Roberts)
`Gantrisin syrup (Roche)
`Gantrisin pediatric suspension (Roche)
`Mandelamine 250 (Parke-Davis)
`Minocin (Lederle)
`Mintezol (Merck Sharp & Dohme)
`Nystatin (Roxane)
`Pediazole (Ross)
`Suprax (Lederle)
`Vancocin*1 (Lilly)
`Vantin (Upjohn)
`Antihistamine/decongestant/antitussive
`Atarax syrup (Roerig)
`Chlorafed (Hauck)
`Codiclear DH (Central)
`Deconamine syrup (Berlex)
`Entuss-D (Hauck)
`
`Iodinated glycerol (Roxane)
`Iodinated glycerol/Dextromethorphan (Roxane)
`Isoclor (Fisons)
`Tuss-Ornade (SmithKline Beecham)
`Cardiovascular agents
`Aldomet (Merck Sharp & Dohme)
`Colestid*1 (Upjohn)
`Digoxin elixir (Roxane)
`Hydrochlorothiazide (Roxane)
`Propranolol oral solution (Roxane)
`Propranolol Intensol (Roxane)
`Gastrointestinal
`AlternaGEL (Johnson & Johnson-Merck)
`Aluminum hydroxide gel (Roxane)
`Aluminum hydroxide concentrated (Roxane)
`Aromatic cascara fluid extract (Roxane)
`Castor oil*1 (Roxane)
`Citrocarbonate1 (Upjohn)
`Doxinate (Hoechst-Roussel)
`Effersyllium1 (Johnson & Johnson-Merck)
`Gaviscon ESRF (Marion Merrell Dow)
`
`Ipecac syrup (Roxane)
`Kaolin pectin (Roxane)
`Kaopectate regular flavor (Upjohn)
`Loperamide (Roxane)
`Maalox plus, extra strength (Rhone-Poulenc Rorer)
`
`Milk of Magnesia* (Roxane)
`Milk of Magnesia concentrated (Roxane)
`Mylanta double strength (Johnson & Johnson-
`Merck)
`Parapectolin (Rhone-Poulenc Rorer)
`Perdiem1 (Rhone-Poulenc Rorer)
`Hormonal agents
`Dexamethasone solution (Roxane)
`Dexamethasone Intensol* (Roxane)
`Prednisone solution (Roxane)
`Prednisone Intensol* (Roxane)
`Proglycem (Baker Cummins)
`
`Meperidine 50 mg
`Indomethacin 25 mg
`Meperidine 50 mg
`Methadone 50 mg
`Morphine 50 mg
`Morphine sulfate 20 mg
`Morphine sulfate 100 mg
`Morphine sulfate 20 mg
`Oxycodone 100 mg
`
`Furazolidone 50 mg
`Sulfisoxazole 500 mg
`Sulfisoxazole 500 mg
`Methenamine mandelate 250 mg
`Minocycline 50 mg
`Thiazbendazole 500 mg
`Nystatin 500,000 units
`Erythromycin 200 mg, sulfisoxazole 600 mg
`Cefixime 100 mg
`Vancomycin 250 or 417 mg
`Cefpodoxime axetil 50 mg
`
`Hydroxyzine 10 mg
`Chlorpheniramine 2 mg, pseudoephedrine 30 mg
`Hydrocodone 5 mg, guaifenesin 100 mg
`Chlorpheniramine 2 mg, pseudoephedrine 30 mg
`Hydrocodone 5 mg, pseudoephedrine 30 mg,
`guaifenesin 300 mg
`Iodinated glycerol 60 mg
`Iodinated glycerol 30 mg, dextromethorphan 10 mg
`Chlorpheniramine 2 mg, pseudoephedrine 30 mg
`Phenylpropanolamine 12.5 mg, caramiphen 6.7 mg
`
`Methyldopa 250 mg
`Colestipol 5 g per packet
`Digoxin 0.25 mg
`Hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg
`Propranolol 20 or 40 mg
`Propranolol 400 mg
`
`Aluminum hydroxide 600 mg
`Aluminum hydroxide 450 mg
`Aluminum hydroxide 675 mg
`Cascara sagrada extract equivalent to 1 g/mL
`Castor oil
`Sodium citrate 1.82 g, sodium bicarbonate 0.78 g
`Docusate 50 mg
`Psyllium hydrocolloid 3 g
`Aluminum hydroxide 254 mg, magnesium
`carbonate 237.5 mg
`Ipecac alkaloids 20 mg/15 mL
`Kaolin, pectin
`Attapulgite 200 mg
`Loperamide 1 mg
`Aluminum hydroxide 500 mg, magnesium
`hydroxide 450 mg, simethicone 40 mg
`Magnesium hydroxide 400 mg
`Magnesium hydroxide 1200 mg
`Aluminum hydroxide 400 mg, magnesium
`hydroxide 400 mg, simethicone 40 mg
`Attapulgite 200 mg
`Psyllium (82% w/v), senna (18% w/v)
`
`Dexamethasone 0.5 mg
`Dexamethasone 5 mg
`Prednisone 5 mg
`Prednisone 25 mg
`Diazoxide 250 mg
`
`272
`
`“INACTIVE” INGREDIENTS IN PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
`Downloaded from
`pediatrics.aappublications.org
` by guest on May 11, 2015
`
`Page 5 of 13
`
`

`
`TABLE 4.
`
`Continued
`
`Classification and Product
`(Manufacturer)
`
`Psychotropics
`Chlorpromazine Intensol (Roxane)
`Cibalith-S (Ciba-Geigy)
`Haldol* (McNeil)
`Haloperidol Intensol* (Roxane)
`Lithium citrate (Roxane)
`Navane (Roerig)
`Prozac (Lilly)
`Sinequan (Roerig)
`Thioridazine solution (Roxane)
`Thioridazine Intensol (Roxane)
`Thiothixene Intensol* (Roxane)
`Thorazine (SmithKline Beecham)
`Trilafon (Schering)
`Sedatives/hypnotics
`Chloral hydrate syrup (Roxane)
`Lorazepam Intensol*1 (Roxane)
`Spasmolytics/bronchodilators
`Aquaphylline (Ferndale)
`Elixophyllin GG (Forest)
`Marax DF (Roerig)
`Slo-Phyllin GG (Rhone-Poulenc Rorer)
`Somophyllin DF (Fisons)
`Theoclear-80 (Central)
`Theolair liquid (3M Riker)
`Theophylline solution (Roxane)
`Theostat 80 syrup (Laser)
`Vitamins
`DHT intensol (Roxane)
`Drisdol (Sanofi Winthrop)
`Theragran liquid (Apothecon)
`Miscellaneous
`Antiminth (Roerig)
`Glyoxide (Marion Merrell Dow)
`Klorvess (Sandoz)
`* Flavoring free.
`1 Preservative free.
`
`Active Ingredients (per 5 mL Unless
`Otherwise Indicated)
`
`Chlorpromazine 150, 500 mg
`Lithium 8 mEq
`Haloperidol 10 mg
`Haloperidol 10 mg
`Lithium 8 mEq
`Thiothixene 25 mg
`Fluoxetine 20 mg
`Doxepin 50 mg
`Thioridazine 80 mg/15 mL
`Thioridazine 150, 500 mg
`Thiothixene 25 mg
`Chlorpromazine 10 mg
`Perphenazine 16 mg
`
`Chloral hydrate 250, 500 mg
`Lorazepam 10 mg
`
`Theophylline 5.33 mg
`Theophylline 100 mg, guafenesin 100 mg,
`Ephedrine 6.25 mg, theophylline 32.5 mg, hydroxyzine 2.5 mg
`Theophylline 50 mg, guafenesin 30 mg
`Theophylline 90 mg
`Theophylline 26.66 mg
`Theophylline 26.66 mg
`Theophylline 26.66 mg
`Theophylline 26.66 mg
`
`Dihydrotachysterol 1 mg
`Ergocalciferol 8000 U/mL
`Multivitamins
`
`Pyrantel pamoate 250 mg
`Carbamide peroxide 100 mg/mL, anhydrous glycerol
`Potassium chloride 10%
`
`increased mortality were positively correlated with
`substantial benzoic acid and benzyl alcohol levels in
`neonates.81 The incidence of premature infant mor-
`tality, kernicterus, and intraventricular hemorrhage
`decreased markedly after discontinuation of pre-
`served flush solutions.82–84 In surviving infants, ex-
`posure to benzyl alcohol was also found to be asso-
`ciated with morbidity, including cerebral palsy and
`developmental delay.83
`Most therapeutic agents, other than large-volume
`fluids, contain amounts of benzyl alcohol smaller
`than those associated with neonatal death. The ef-
`fects of lower amounts, however, have not been ad-
`equately studied (Table 3). Toxicity has been de-
`scribed in one infant weighing 3350 g who received
`32 to 105 mg/kg/d.80 Continuous infusions of high
`doses of some medications containing benzyl alco-
`hol, such as doxapram, may reach the range of ben-
`zyl alcohol dosage associated with toxicity in this
`case report. Premature infants receiving low doses in
`medications were found to have peak benzoic acid
`levels 10 times higher than those in term infants but
`without evidence of toxicity.85 Two studies noting
`the striking decrease in kernicterus after removal of
`benzyl alcohol did not reveal a dose–response rela-
`tionship and could not exclude the possibility that
`other advances in therapy were responsible.84,86
`
`The US Pharmacopeia requires labeling of bacteri-
`ostatic water and saline for injection with the phrase,
`“Not for use in newborns.” The FDA declined similar
`labeling for multidose parenteral medications, be-
`cause serious toxic effects from benzyl alcohol had
`virtually disappeared.87 The toxic effects in newborns
`relate primarily to the use of preservative-containing
`flush solutions, which clearly are to be avoided in
`newborns. At low doses, such as those present when
`medications preserved with benzyl alcohol are ad-
`ministered, benzyl alcohol is safe for newborns.
`Bacteriostatic saline solution containing benzyl al-
`cohol was associated with severe bronchitis and he-
`moptysis when used to dilute albuterol for nebuliza-
`tion in an adult man.88 Nonpreserved saline solution
`should be used in children to dilute nebulized bron-
`chodilators.
`Benzyl alcohol may also rarely cause hypersensi-
`tivity reactions. Contact dermatitis,89 as well as more
`generalized allergic symptoms including nausea, fa-
`tigue, fever, maculopapular rash, or angioedema,
`may occur after parenteral administration of prod-
`ucts containing benzyl alcohol as a preservative.90–92
`
`COLORING AGENTS
`Numerous dyes are used in pharmaceutical man-
`ufacturing. These dyes give products a distinctive,
`
`Downloaded from
`
`AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS
`
` by guest on May 11, 2015pediatrics.aappublications.org
`
`273
`
`Page 6 of 13
`
`

`
`identifiable appearance, and they impart a uniform
`and attractive color to products that might otherwise
`be drab and unappealing or exhibit color variation
`among batches.
`Several groups of dyes have been associated with
`serious adverse effects. The azo dye tartrazine
`(FD&C Yellow No. 5) is known to be potentially
`dangerous in aspirin-intolerant individuals. Approx-
`imately 2% to 20% of asthmatics are sensitive to
`aspirin. The incidence of cross-reaction to tartrazine
`was previously believed to be as high as 10%,93,94 but
`more recent carefully blinded studies have shown
`the incidence to be less than 2.4%.95–98 Unlike aspirin,
`tartrazine does not alter prostaglandin synthesis and
`does not, therefore, exert anti-inflammatory actions.
`Nonetheless, reactions to tartrazine are similar to
`those produced by aspirin, occur in patients both
`with and without a history of aspirin intolerance,
`and include acute bronchospasm, nonimmunologic
`urticaria,
`eosinophilia,
`and angioedema.94,99–107
`Rarely, nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions oc-
`cur.108,109 The most likely mechanism for these reac-
`tions is dose-related histamine release from mast
`cells.110,111 Patients with recurrent allergic vascular
`purpura may experience exacerbations after expo-
`sure to azo dyes, such as tartrazine, sunset yellow,
`and new coccine.112–114 Because of both the serious-
`ness of these reactions and the widespread use of
`tartrazine in foods and over-the-counter and pre-
`scription drugs, since 1980 the FDA has required that
`all products containing tartrazine be labeled so that
`these substances can be avoided.115
`Patients with the classic aspirin triad reaction
`(asthma, urticaria, and rhinitis) or anaphylactoid re-
`actions may also develop similar reactions from dyes
`other
`than tartrazine,
`including amaranth,116–118
`erythrosine,118,119 indigo carmine (FD&C Blue No.
`2),103 ponceau,106,116,118 new coccine,113,117 sunset yel-
`low,103,106,108,113,117,118 Brilliant Blue (FD&C Blue No.
`1),106,118 methyl blue,120 quinolone yellow,121 and
`FD&C Red No. 40.122
`Gastrointestinal intolerance, with abdominal pain,
`vomiting, an

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket