throbber
PAGE 1 OF 3
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2304
`LUPIN v SENJU
`IPR2015-01105
`
`

`
`2912016
`Miami.
`
`EP Valzlp - Vatage Pa'rt—As Eliqis limps on Xadlo rhniraes mi flood llimers
`
`‘They otter tremendous benefit over warfari_n — they have less bleeding risk, they are easier to
`use, they have less drug and food interactions. But it takes time for this to penetrate down,
`particularly to the community practitioner,’ he says.
`
`Despite al this many analysts were still expecting glquis to stop &rLelt_o in its tracks. But
`prescription data suggests that the impact has been negligible and as such the consensus
`view of the market for these oral thinners has shifted dramatically this year, with numbers for
`gcareltq climbing back up and Q5‘uis falling, producing the picture in the table below.
`
`Changing outlook for the oral anticoagulants
`Company Cunent
`%
`Current
`%
`%change in First
`2018
`change
`2014
`change
`2014
`launch
`sales
`overlast
`sales
`overlast
`forecast
`in major
`forecast
`12
`forecast
`12
`since
`market
`(Sm)
`months
`($m)
`months
`launch
`2,667
`54%
`1 ,353
`60%
`1 10%
`
`Bristol-
`Myers
`filfl
`
`gohnson
`33. Johnson
`
`_[)aiichi
`$3419
`
`_Lixiang
`
`2,631
`
`-37%
`
`491
`
`1 ,B39
`
`50%
`
`1 ,005
`
`350
`
`65%
`
`94
`
`Jul 201 1
`(US)
`
`Jul 2011
`U393")
`
`gm.’
`The big gap in this picture is Boehringer lngelheinfs Pradaxa which reached the main markets
`frst. The company being privately owned, consensus sales forecasts are not available;
`floehringer reported global sales of S1.43bn last year.
`
`US prescription data indicate that Pltfi lost market share on the arrival of gay in July
`2011 and contiiues to do so, while grgltg demand is still climbing strongly. Elgrfi was only
`launched in March, and has so far captured only 1.1% of the market, according to data 15
`presented at an investor conference this week; Earelto is on 19.3% to fla_d1a_'s 15.4%, the
`company said.
`
`In part, this will be thanks to Xarelt_o's broad label, the widea of all three blood thinners with
`seven approved indications — Pradaxa and lEIiguis_ are only approved in stroke prevention in
`the US.
`
`The J8-Jgyg pill is also approved to treat deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary emboisms,
`and to prevent deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing knee or hip replacement surgery.
`On top of this 5&5! has generated some positive data in acute coronary syndromes, a
`severely il patient population in which _Elg‘uis faied and poehringer declined to test Eradaxg in
`phase III.
`
`European regulators allowed marketing in this setting earlier this year and alhough the US has
`so far declined to grant approval, evidence of utility in a very hard-to—treat population can only
`have helped the dmg's reputation (Q/l'L'lO!fLafl for new blood thinners in acute
`goronam smdrome March 5, 2013).
`
`liliguis is due to hear on approval in the albeit smaller pre-surgery setting in the US in May
`next year — it has already sold for this use in Europe — and this could help bump up demand.
`
`Once vs twice
`
`Dosing is likely to be another factor favouring Xarelto. Whie both Egg and Pradfi pills
`need to be taken twice a day in stroke prevention, Xarelto is once daily. Tim Race, pharma
`analyst at Deutsche Bank, reckons this couki be providing an edge.
`
`‘These patients are on many other drugs and once daily fits in best. Also, doctors don't trust
`patients to take their pills, so is [Eggs] really better in the real world if you miss a dose?‘ he
`says.
`
`figyg is convinced that dosing is playing a major part in grelt_o's success. ‘Physician surveys
`have shown that they use §arelto_ over other agents because of its breadth of indications at
`launch and once daiy dosing,‘ Dr Kemal Mal k, head of development and chief medical oflicer,
`said at figs presentation yesterday.
`
`Dr Sacco, who was involved in one of the pivotal trials testing §l_igu_i§, agrees that _Xarelt9_'s
`litp1Iwww.epvaIa_)e.canILIriversdMamspx?lype=Stuy&id=461m18JsEFNaIu;e=yes
`
`PAGE 2 OF 3
`
`

`
`2190016
`schedule can be an advantage.
`
`EP Vantage - Vantage Point—As Eliquis limps on Xarelto dominates oral blood thinners
`
`“Once a day often improves compliance." But whether any of these drugs is truly better is "the
`million dollar question", he adds, as there have been no head-to-heads, and comparing trials
`results is fraught with the usual caveats.
`
`‘It's really hard to choose between them. Ultimately it comes down to what the physician is
`most comfortable using," he says.
`
`Inertia
`
`This stance will naturally favour an incumbent, and helps explain §ig_ui_s’s struggles to get off
`the ground, despite being perceived as the safest. As such, it is too early write off the drug as
`an also-ran, although if it still does have market-leading potential it seems this will longer than
`expected to fulfil.
`
`And there is another cloud on the horizon for Eggs, in the shape of a fourth oral contender —
`_gixiana_ or §doxat3a_n from _[_)aiichi Sankyg. Like _E£;_uls_ and xareltqthis is a _l1ct_o_rla_ inhibitor —
`_Prada)g is a thrombin inhibitor — and is also being tested as a once—a—day medicine.
`
`Phase III data released earlier this year, in patients with deep vein or lung blood clots, found
`the project non—inferior to warfarirl at preventing the recurrence of clots and superior to
`vvartarifl at preventing bleeding. Superiority on both measures would have been a huge win for
`the Japanese company, but results in the all-important stroke prevention indication will be the
`real measure of edoxabi. Those data are I kely to emerge at the AHA conference in
`N°Vembe' (§§.9.:..Q<:*E’1LL’£'S_fle.2%2fl2<l’£'J£'Lm9_CfllV.ifl.99§fl!§£z‘E£'1¢£1£,
`September 2, 2013).
`
`Of course, a strong showing in stroke prevention will mark once—a—day edoxafl as a strong
`competitor to all of the anticoagulants. Although _Daiich_i still has to get the drug to market — the
`FDA did not give )_(a_rrell>_ or gigifi an easy ride — and then battle in an even more crowded
`market place.
`
`And E)/gr and J&J will not let their lead go without a fight — the German company set out
`plans yesterday to recruit another 30,000 patients in trials in additional clotting settings and a
`wider atrial f brtllation population, to broaden the label further.
`
`It is undoubtedly early days for §ligu_is, and Bristol-Myers and @453 have laid out plans for a
`big marketing push to reinvigorate the launch. But its third-to-market handicap and twice-a—day
`dosing disadvantage, which were brushed off by the companies and bullish analysts before
`launch, will take time to overcome.
`
`To contact the miter of this story email Amy Brown in London at §mZB@_e‘pi/antage_con_i
`or follow _@mzEPL/:ita_q§ on Twitter
`
`—d and p.t'r:r..~d by E? \‘3l'lI7-l(_]-: aric l3 dlstiibuterl t",' Eva mate ltd. ‘A1‘{lJ\-*L.“V}E‘:‘
`u: news@e%ntage.cg
`
`'
`
`is: otad-..a> e"d foecast :-to-di.:: sales and hm’:
`.adlVl] dat
`. —.«"hancIng- d-:ClS\0l'lS.
`
`‘=‘
`
`Home Reports lTerms 5 Cx:vnd|tioriSlF'rw3cy Policy l Cc-:-he Policy >Amn Us lifomnct Us
`
`c,,W,ig,,, V 20.5 Ep \,,,,,m,
`
`9 F*=*'*—*~m"*'~'"er
`
`FreshView »- .
`
`4'
`
`A
`
`;
`
`Ill
`
`http:/lwww.epvantage.comIUniversalMewmpx?type<=Story&id=461001&isEPVantage=ye5
`
`PAGE 3 OF 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket