throbber
Page 1 of 24
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2298
`
`LUPIN V. SENJU
`
`IPR2015-01105
`
`Page 1 of 24
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2298
`LUPIN v. SENJU
`IPR2015-01105
`
`

`
`

`
`NOILDOCJOHLNI
`
`—I
`
`>TI
`
`-
`rn
`o‘H
`F3
`
`0Z—
`
`Im Z—
`
`I
`an
`
`TABLE or CONTENTS
`
`KEY FACTS ‘I
`
`MARKETING TO HEALTH CARE
`PROVIDERS 8: PRESCRIBING PATTERNS 3
`
`Pharmaceutical sales representatives provide
`doctors with important information about
`new treatment options that is factored
`into prescribing, but studies find that many
`other factors, including insurers’ policies,
`affect prescribing decisions, often with
`greater impact. In fact, about 2 out of
`3 medicines prescribed in the U.S. are
`generic—much higher than in nearly
`all other developed countries.
`
`INFORMATION TO HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS 5
`
`Government regulates the marketing of
`pharmaceuticals, and companies strive
`to provide reliable, valuable information.
`Delivering this information is key to making
`physicians aware of the latest advances.
`
`SAMPLES 6
`
`Samples provide many benefits to patients,
`allowing them to begin treatment sooner and
`helping them find the right medicine.
`
`"GIFTS" TO HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS 7
`
`PhRMA's member companies are committed
`to following the highest ethical standards
`and all legal requirements in their interactions
`with health care professionals. In 2008, they
`adopted a newly revised code that, among
`other things, redefines the narrow category
`of educational items company representatives
`can give to health care professionals.
`
`DTC & PHYSICIAN I PATIENT RELATIONSHIP 8
`
`Many physicians and patients report that DTC
`advertising enhances their communication.
`
`UNDERDIAGNOSIS & UNDERTREATMENT 9
`
`Studies report significant underdiagnosis
`and undertreatment of serious conditions
`that affect millions of Americans. While
`
`these conditions, such as diabetes and
`cardiovascular disease, can often be treated
`
`effectively, left untreated they generate poor
`health outcomes and high health costs for
`avoidable hospitalizations. Pharmaceutical
`marketing and promotion help address this
`problem by raising awareness of disease
`symptoms and treatments, and prompting
`patients to visit their doctor.
`
`PATIENT EDUCATION & EMPOWERMENT 12
`
`DTC advertising creates awareness of diseases
`and treatment options, helps get patients into
`needed treatment, and empowers patients
`with information.
`
`DTC 8: PRESCRIBING PATTERNS 13
`
`A majority of physicians report not feeling
`pressure to prescribe requested medications.
`In fact, many physicians recommend lifestyle
`changes and other treatments when patients
`request a specific medicine.
`
`DTC ADVERTISING & DRUG PRICES / SPENDING 15
`
`Government agencies and independent
`experts report no direct relationship between
`drug marketing and drug prices.
`
`SPENDING ON PROMOTION AND R&D 17
`
`Pharmaceutical companies are very research-
`intensive and spend significantly more on
`research and development than on marketing
`and promotion.
`
`GOVERNMENT & INDUSTRY REGULATION 19
`
`Pharmaceutical marketing is closely regulated
`by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`(FDA) to help assure that promotional
`materials are accurate, fairly balanced, and
`limited to information that has been approved
`by the FDA. Many pharmaceutical companies
`have also adopted voluntary pharmaceutical
`industry guidelines that lay out standards for
`interactions with health care providers and
`appropriate DTC marketing.
`
`Page 3 of 24
`
`

`
`=______
`
`

`
`Underdiagnosis & Undertreatment Continued
`
`- Another RAND study published in the
`Annals of/nternal Medicine found that
`
`50°/o of all quality problems in the use of
`
`medicines was accounted for by underuse,
`
`compared to 3°/o accounted for by overuse.
`
`A Harvard University/Massachusetts
`
`General Hospital and Harris Interactive
`
`Survey found that:
`
`- 1/4 of patients who visit their doctor
`
`after seeing a DTC ad receive a new
`
`diagnosis.
`
`46% of physicians felt that DTC
`
`advertising increased patients’
`
`compliance with prescribed treatment.
`
`By treating patients according to guidelines
`
`and by eliminating the underuse of
`
`high blood pressure medicines, 89,000
`lives could be saved and 420,000
`
`hospitalizations avoided annually.
`(See pgs 94 1)
`
`Patient Education
`
`~ A 2007 KRC Research survey found that:
`
`o
`
`1 in 4 consumers sought more
`
`DTC 8: Prescribing Patterns
`
`~ A 2006 Government Accountability Office
`
`(GAO) report found that only 2—7°/o of
`consumers who saw a DTC advertisement
`
`requested and ultimately received a
`
`prescription for the advertised drug.
`
`» A 2002 study on the effect of DTC
`
`advertising on demand for pharmaceuticals
`
`revealed that DTC advertising may increase
`
`demand for a particular brand drug, but
`
`only if it has a ’’favorable status” on the
`
`insurer's formulary.
`(See pgs 13-14)
`
`DTC Advertising & Drug Prices / Spending
`
`= According to the Federal Trade
`
`Commission, "[DTC advertising] can
`
`empower consumers to manage their own
`
`health care by providing information that
`
`will help them, with the assistance of their
`
`doctors, to make better informed decisions
`
`about their treatment options. . .Consumers
`
`receive these benefits from DTC advertising
`
`with little, if any, evidence that such
`
`advertising increases prescription drug
`
`information after seeing a DTC ad.
`
`prices.” [Emphasis Added]
`
`- 4 in 5 consumers agree that
`
`advertising for prescription medicines
`
`can educate people about health
`
`conditions and treatment options.
`
`= A Prevention Magazine physician
`
`survey found that 70% of doctors feel
`
`that ads help educate patients about
`available treatments. 67°/o felt that the
`
`advertisements helped them have better
`
`"The pharmaceutical industry is one of the
`most research-intensive industries in the
`
`United States. Pharmaceutical firms invest
`
`as much as five times more in research and
`
`development, relative to their sales, than
`
`the average U.S. manufacturing firm.”
`— Congressional Budget Office, 2006
`
`~ Total promotional spending 2006 —
`$12.0 billion
`
`discussions with their patients.
`
`- DTC — $4.8 billion
`
`7<
`l‘|'1
`-<
`‘I1
`J>
`rs
`-—i
`vs
`
`- Office promotion, hospital promotion,
`
`and journal advertising — $7.2 billion
`
`A Total R&D spending 2007 ~ $58.8 billion
`(See pgs 15-I6)
`
`-T The FDA's 2004 survey showed that in
`
`88°/o of cases when patients ask their
`
`physicians about a medicine as a result
`
`of seeing a DTC advertisement, they
`
`have the condition that the drug treats.
`
`A Prevention Magazine patient survey
`
`found that 80% of patients who see
`medicines advertised on television are
`
`aware of the risk information presented,
`
`compared to 66°/o aware of the benefits.
`(See pg 12)
`
`Page 5 of 24
`
`

`
`MARKETING TO HEALTH CARE
`
`PROVIDERS & PRESCRIBING PATTERNS
`
`Pharmaceutical sales representatives provide doctors with important information
`
`about new treatment options that is factored into prescribing, but studies find
`
`that many other factors, including insurers’ policies, affect prescribing decisions,
`
`often with greater impact. In fact, about 2 out of 3 medicines prescribed in the
`
`US. are generic—much higher than in nearly all other developed countries.
`
`CHART 1: Factors Physicians Consider in Prescribing Medicines
`Percent Saying Great Deal or Some Influence on Prescribing Decisions
`
`Olnkal knowledge A
`experience
`Patlenfs unique situation
`
`Peer-reviewed journals
`
`Clinical practice auldellnes
`
`Colleagues A peers
`
`Patient‘: flnandai status
`
`Patlerlfscavuagelibrmialary
`Information from
`pharmaceutical co. reps
`Patient‘: personal options
`
`Prior authorization restrictions
`
`Amount ofthe co-pay
`
`to. I PBM Rem
`

`
`I Great Deal
`
`V‘
`
`Source: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers or America, KRC Research: Survey of Physicians’ Opinions About
`Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research Compan_vActivities and Information, n=501, 2008.
`
`Pharmaceutical marketing to health care
`
`patient’s unique situation. Journal articles, clinical
`
`providers is an important part of keeping
`
`guidelines and formularies are all factors that
`
`physicians up-to-date about new treatments and
`
`physicians consider more than pharmaceutical
`
`their risks and benefits. However, it is only one
`
`company representatives2[See Chart 1].
`
`factor among many in the health care system.
`For instance, health plans may strongly
`
`Two Surveys, one by The Boston Consulting
`Group (BCG) and the other by the Tufts
`
`influence prescribing through formulary design
`
`Center for the Study of Drug Development,
`
`and utilization management strategies, among
`
`echoed these findings. In the BCG survey,
`
`other factors. A recent KRC Research survey
`
`54% of physicians reported that formularies
`
`sponsored by PhRMA found that by far the most
`
`have a major impact on prescribing decisions,
`
`important factors in prescribing are a physician's
`
`50% identified peers, and 47% identified
`
`clinical knowledge and experience and the
`
`clinical guidelines, compared to 14% who
`
`’ KRC Research, ‘Physicians’ Opinions About Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research Company Activities and lnfomiationf n=501, 2008, sponsored by Pharmaceutical Research
`and Manufacturers of America.
`
`3
`
`THE FACTS ABOUT PHARMACEUTICAL MARKETING & PROMOTION
`
`Page 6 of 24
`
`

`
`said pharmaceutical representatives have a
`
`a study in Health Affairs noted that physician
`
`major impact? The Tufts Center for the Study
`
`counterdetailing by insurance companies and
`
`of Drug Development found that among
`
`pharmacy benefit managers to encourage the
`
`factors influencing prescribing decisions in 2007,
`
`use of generics is ”gaining momentum.” In the
`
`physicians considered the following to be "very
`
`public sector, some Medicaid programs have
`
`important": continuing medical education
`
`recently hired physicians and pharmacists to visit
`
`(68%), information from peers (43%), and
`
`doctors’ offices and encourage them to prescribe
`
`payer's decisions (37%). Only 13% of physicians
`
`generics? Counterdetailing by payers and their
`
`considered information from pharmaceutical
`
`agents to influence prescribing decisions is not
`
`companies "very important "‘
`
`subject to FDA regulation, while detailing by
`
`Research published in Health Affairs reports that
`
`pharmaceutical companies is FDA—regulated.
`
`one-third of physicians do not always discuss
`
`Counterdetailing is only one of many payer
`
`treatment options when those options would
`
`tactics to influence physician prescribing. The
`
`not be covered by the patient’s insurer.‘
`
`It is also important to note that approximately
`
`67% of all prescriptions dispensed in the
`
`U.S. in 2007 were for generic drugs,‘ up
`
`from 49% in 2000.7 Moreover, the U.S. has
`
`one of the highest generic market shares of
`
`any developed country.” These facts clearly
`
`demonstrate that the regulated information
`
`conveyed through pharmaceutical company
`
`marketing of brand medicines is only one of
`
`many factors that physicians consider when
`
`making prescribing decisions.
`
`The range of influences on prescribing extends
`
`beyond those identified above. For example,
`
`Health Affairs study also reported that Blue
`Cross Blue Shield of Florida sends letters to
`
`doctors who are low prescribers of generics.
`
`In addition, other health plans plan to
`
`distribute generic drug samples to contracted
`
`physicians.‘° According to The Wall Street
`
`Journal, during a three-month program in
`
`2007, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan paid
`
`doctors for switching patients from the brand
`
`statin they had been taking to a different
`
`statin’s generic copy.“ The physician survey by
`
`KRC Research found that 80% of physicians
`
`have been asked by an insurer to switch a
`
`prescription to a different drug—not merely a
`
`generic copy of the drug they prescribed.”
`
`CHART 2: Brand and Generic Shares of Prescriptions Filled: 1996-2007
`
`
`
`HEW)Hl'lV3H019N|l3>ltlVW
`
`
`
`SNtl3i1Vcl9N|‘El|}DS3}ld5?SHHGI/\Otld
`
`—I— Branded Products
`
`2 [~03
`
`2 61- 2 -
`
`Source: PhRMA Analysis of National Prescription Audit" data from IMS Health, data through 3"’ Quarter of 2007.
`3Boston Consulting Group, 2002 BCG Proprietary Physician Survey, n=399, 2002.
`‘Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Outlook 2008, (Tufts CSDD: Boston, 2008).
`5 M. Wynia et al., " Do Physicians Not Offer Useful Services Because of Coverage Restrictions?," laea/rl7Afla/'rs 22, no.4 (July/August 2003): 190-197.
`5 Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers ofAmerica, Analysis afNar/'onalPrescn‘pIianAua’it"' data from IMS Health, data through 3rd Quarter of 2007.
`7 IMS Health, October, 2007.
`‘ M. Danzon and MF. Furukawa, "Price and Availability of Pharmaceuticals: Evidence from Nine Countries,” I-lea/I/2A/fa/rs Web Exclusive 29 October 2003,
`httpzllcontent.healthaffairs.orglcgilreprint/hlthaff.w3.52ivi (accessed 25 March 2008).
`9}. Malkin et al., "The Changing Face of Pharmacy Benefit Design," I/ea/thAf/airs23, no.1 (2004) 194-199, page 198.
`'0 lbid.
`" V. Fuhrmans, "Doctors Paid To Prescribe Generic Pills,’ The Wall Street/ouma/, 24 January 2008.
`‘1 KRC Research, "Physicians' 0pinionsAbout Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research Company Activities and Information,’ n=501, 2008, sponsored by
`Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers ofAmerica.
`
`Page 7 of 24
`
`

`
`INFORMATION TO HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS
`Government regulates the marketing of pharmaceuticals, and companies
`strive to provide reliable, valuable information. Delivering this information
`is key to making physicians aware of the latest advances.
`“There is a clear need for interactions between
`
`physicians and the pharmaceutical industry
`to ensure the free fl ow of valid scientifi c
`information. When the information is accurate
`and complete, physicians have the necessary
`tools to make the right prescribing decisions.”20
` – American Medical Association, Testimony
`
`economist David Cutler and then-Stanford researcher
`Mark McClellan. Through promotional activities for a
`then-new treatment for depression, “Manufacturers
`of SSRIs [depression medications] encouraged
`doctors to watch for depression and the reduced
`stigma afforded by the new medications induced
`patients to seek help.”17 As a result, diagnosis and
`treatment for depression doubled over the 1990s.
`However, underdiagnosis and undertreatment remain
`high: 16.2% of Americans suffer from a depressive
`disorder, of those, only 51.6% receive treatment.18
`
`Physicians evaluate information from a range of sources,
`including continuing medical education, journal articles,
`clinical practice guidelines, and company representatives.
`They consider many aspects of information from
`representatives to be useful: 95% say information about
`drug interactions is useful, 95% value information about
`the latest drugs and treatments, 92% fi nd answers to
`specifi c questions they have useful, and 90% appreciate
`information about patient assistance programs.19
`
`According to the Institute of Medicine, science
`and technology have been advancing at an
`unprecedented pace in recent years.13 Despite this,
`diffusion into practice is slow: One study found that
`medical research takes 17 years to be incorporated
`into clinical practice.14 Pharmaceutical marketing
`plays a valuable role by delivering the newest
`information on medicines to physicians and helping
`to translate new technologies into practice.
`
`This information must be reliable. State and federal
`government regulations govern the marketing of
`products, and serious consequences exist for non-
`compliance. Only a product’s scientifi cally proven
`properties, verifi ed by the FDA, can be discussed
`in its marketing. Furthermore, pharmaceutical
`representatives strive to provide the most accurate
`information in order to build credibility and earn the
`trust of physicians over time.
`
`Published research has looked at whether
`physicians see value in pharmaceutical
`promotional and marketing efforts. A 2008 KRC
`Research survey reported that nearly 90% of
`physicians were either very satisfi ed (29%) or
`somewhat satisfi ed (59%) with the information
`they received from company representatives.15 A
`2002 BCG survey yielded similar results.16
`
`The value of disseminating information to
`physicians is evident in a study by Harvard
`
`13 Institute of Medicine, Crossing the Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, March 2001).
`14 E.A. Balas and S.A. Boren, “Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement,” Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000: Patient-centered Systems, (Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer, 2000), 65–70.
`15 KRC Research, “Physicians’ Opinions About Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research Company Activities and Information,” n=501, 2008, sponsored by Pharmaceutical Research
`and Manufacturers of America.
`16 Boston Consulting Group, 2002 BCG Proprietary Physician Survey (400 respondents), 2002, as reported in “Pharmaceutical Marketing and Promotion, Creating Access to
`Innovation,” Economic Realities in Health Care Policy 3, no. 1, (Pfi zer: 2003): 11.
`17 D. Cutler and M. McClellan, “Is Technological Change in Medicine Worth It?” Health Affairs 20, no.5 (September/October 2001): 11-29.
`18 R.C. Kessler, P. Berglund, O. Demler et al., “The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R),” The Journal of the
`American Medical Association 289, no.23 (18 June 2003): 3095-3105.
`19 KRC Research, “Physicians’ Opinions About Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research Company Activities and Information,” n=501, 2008, sponsored by Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.
`20 American Medical Association, “Paid to Prescribe?: Exploring the Relationship Between Doctors and the Drug Industry,” Statement to the Special Committee on Aging, United
`States Senate, (Washington, DC: Statement of Robert M. Sade, 27 June 2007) http://aging.senate.gov/events/hr176rs.pdf, (accessed 29 August 2007).
`
`5 THE FACTS ABOUT PHARMACEUTICAL MARKETING & PROMOTION
`
`Page 8 of 24
`
`

`
`
`
`SHEICII/\OHdHHVD
`
`HflVElH01NO|lVWtlOdN|
`
`cn
`
`> Z‘
`
`O
`F-
`rn
`m
`
`SAMPLES
`
`Samples provide many benefits to patients, allowing them to begin
`
`treatment sooner and helping them find the right medicine.
`
`Another role that pharmaceutical promotion
`
`samples provide them with useful first-hand
`
`often plays is providing samples to physicians.
`
`experience. According to the chairman of the
`
`Doctors may distribute samples to patients for
`
`Asthma and Allergy Foundation's Medical-
`
`several reasons—for instance, to get patients
`
`Scientific Council, samples are "an important
`
`started on therapy right away, to optimize
`
`way of trying to find out which [medicines]
`
`dosing or choice of drug before committing to
`
`work for patients.”12
`
`a particular course of treatment, and sometimes
`
`to help patients who might not be able to afford
`medicines on their own.
`
`Although the main role of samples is to allow
`
`patients to try a medicine before filling a full
`
`prescription and to start treatment right away,
`
`A 2008 KRC Research survey found 69% of
`
`in some cases physicians provide samples to
`
`physicians believe free drug samples are either
`
`help patients who are financially struggling. A
`
`always useful (52%) or often useful (17%).2‘
`
`recent Kaiser Family Foundation survey found
`
`Ninety-five percent of physicians surveyed
`
`that 75% of physicians frequently (58%) or
`
`agreed that samples allow patients to start
`immediate treatment and 84% said that
`
`sometimes (17%) give patients samples to assist
`
`them with their out-of-pocket costs.” In the
`
`survey by KRC Research, 93% of physicians
`
`said drug samples helped them assist those
`
`patients who are uninsured or in need of
`financial assistance.“
`
`"[Samp|es provide] a clear and
`
`
`
`direct benefit to patients who have
`
`a medically indicated need for
`
`treatment, but lack the resources
`
`to obtain the necessary care.”25
`
`—American Medica/Association, Testimony
`
`1' KRC Research, ‘Physicians’ Opinions About Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research CompanyAct1'vities and Information,’ n=501, 2008, sponsored by Phannaceutical Research
`and Manufacturers of America.
`" J. Saranow and AD. Marcus ‘The Higher Cost of Sneezing —As Nonprescription Claritin Hits Shelves, Insurers Jack up Prices of Other Allergy Drugs,‘ Ihe WaISrreeUournaI, 10
`December 2002.
`1’ Kaiser Family Foundation, Nan'ona/SurveyalPhysia‘ans,Toplines, November 2006, http'JIwww.kff.orgkaiserpo|lsluploadl7584.pdl (accessed 10 December 2007).
`1‘ KRC Research, ‘Physicians’ Opinions About Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research CompanyActivities and Information,’ n=501, 2008, sponsored by Phannaceutical Research
`and Manufacturers of Amerim.
`“American Medical Association, ‘Paid to Prescribe}: Exploring the Relationship Retween Doctors and the Drug Industry,‘ Statement to the Special Committee anAging, (liked
`States Senate, (Washington, DC: Statement of Robert M. Sade, 27 June 2007) http:/Iagingsenategov/eventslhri76rs.pdt (accessed 29 August 2007).
`
`Page 9 of 24
`
`

`
`“GIFTS” TO HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS
`
`PhRMA’s member companies are committed to following the highest
`ethical standards and all legal requirements in their interactions with
`health care professionals. In 2008, they adopted a newly revised code
`that, among other things, redefi nes the narrow category of educational
`items company representatives can give to health care professionals.
`
`In 2008, the PhRMA Board adopted a newly
`revised Code on Interactions with Health Care
`Professionals (the “PhRMA Code”), refl ecting
`a commitment to working with health care
`professionals for the benefi t of patients. The
`PhRMA Code starts with the fundamental
`principle that a health care professional’s care
`of patients should be based—and should be
`perceived as being based—solely on each
`patient’s medical needs and the health care
`professional’s medical knowledge.
`
`The PhRMA Code reaffi rms that interactions
`between company representatives and health
`care professionals should be focused on
`providing information on products, scientifi c and
`educational information, and supporting medical
`education. Thus, the revised Code prohibits
`distribution of non-educational items, such
`as pens, mugs, and other “reminder” objects
`adorned with a company logo to health care
`professionals. The Code acknowledges that such
`items may foster misperceptions that company
`interactions with health care professionals are not
`based on informing them about medicines.
`
`Informational discussions by company
`representatives provide health care professionals
`with valuable information about new medicines
`that can lead to improved patient care. The new
`
`Code states that company representatives are
`permitted to offer an occasional meal as long
`as it is modest, and only offered in the offi ce or
`hospital setting, in conjunction with educational
`presentations. Limiting these meals to the
`offi ce or hospital setting, instead of restaurants,
`ensures that the meal is merely incidental to
`the substantive communication between the
`representative and the health care professionals
`in a professional setting.
`
`The revised PhRMA Code reaffi rms that
`representatives should not give health care
`professionals any items for personal benefi t
`or provide tickets to any recreational or
`entertainment events. It allows a company to
`engage health care professionals for bona fi de
`consulting services, provided that the company
`has a legitimate need for the services, the
`arrangement is not a reward or inducement to
`prescribe a particular medicine, and compensation
`is based on the fair market value of those services.
`
`The revised PhRMA Code contains a compliance
`mechanism, requiring companies that state their
`intentions to follow the Code to certify annually that
`they have policies and procedures in place to foster
`compliance. PhRMA will identify on its website the
`companies that intend to follow the Code and the
`status of their compliance certifi cations.
`
`7 THE FACTS ABOUT PHARMACEUTICAL MARKETING & PROMOTION
`
`Page 10 of 24
`
`

`
`
`
`

`
`UNDERDIAGNOSIS & UNDERTREATMENT
`
`Studies report signifi cant underdiagnosis and undertreatment of serious
`conditions that affect millions of Americans. While these conditions, such
`as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, can often be treated effectively, left
`untreated they generate poor health outcomes and high health costs for
`avoidable hospitalizations. Pharmaceutical marketing and promotion help
`address this problem by raising awareness of disease symptoms and
`treatments and prompting patients to see their doctor.
`
`Getting patients into needed therapy is one of
`the most important roles of DTC advertising.
`By helping to reduce underdiagnosis and
`undertreatment, DTC ads benefi t patients
`and the health care system.
`
`For the majority of diseases, research shows
`that underdiagnosis and undertreatment are
`common.30 A landmark 2003 study conducted
`by RAND Health found that U.S. patients fail
`to receive about half of all recommended
`health care. The study found that medicines
`are underused in numerous situations
`for many conditions. Notably, for quality
`standards related to medication, patients
`on average failed to receive recommended
`care 30% of the time.31 Another RAND study
`assessed quality problems in the delivery of
`pharmacotherapy and identifi ed 50% of all
`problems as underuse of needed medicines
`while overuse accounted for 3% of problems.32
`
`Pharmaceutical marketing and promotion help
`address underuse by encouraging patients
`to talk to their doctors about conditions that
`may otherwise have gone undiagnosed or
`untreated. In fact, one survey found that 56
`million Americans in 2006 had conversations
`with their doctors after seeing a DTC ad.33
`
`A survey by Harvard University/Massachusetts
`General Hospital and Harris Interactive found
`that one-quarter of adult patients who
`visited their physician after seeing a DTC ad
`received a new diagnosis.34 Some of the most
`common new diagnoses––high cholesterol,
`hypertension, diabetes, and depression––are
`often underdiagnosed and undertreated in the
`general population [See Chart 3].
`
`The Harvard study also showed that even after
`patients leave the offi ce, the benefi ts persist:
`46% of physicians felt that DTC advertising
`increased patients’ compliance with prescribed
`treatment.35 This is an important benefi t
`
`30 See for example, J.D. Kleinke, “Access Versus Excess: Value-Based Cost Sharing for Prescription Drugs,” Health Affairs 23, no. 1 (January/February 2004): 34-47.
`31 E. A. McGlynn et al., “The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States,” The New England Journal of Medicine 348, no.26 (26 June 2003): 2635-2645.
`32 T.P. Higashi, G. Shekelle et al., “The quality of pharmacologic care for vulnerable older patients.” Annals of Internal Medicine 140, no. 9 (4 May 2004): 714-20.
`33 Prevention Magazine, The National Survey on Consumer Reaction to DTC Advertising of Prescription Medicines, 2007.
`34 J. S. Weissman et al., “Physicians Report on Patient Encounters Involving Direct-to-Consumer Advertising,” Health Affairs Web Exclusive, 28 April 2004, http://content.
`healthaffairs.org/cgi/reprint/hlthaff.w4.219v1 (accessed 25 March 2008).
`35 Ibid.
`
`9 THE FACTS ABOUT PHARMACEUTICAL MARKETING & PROMOTION
`
`Page 12 of 24
`
`

`
`===.==2E_E_E=2=====.====_:=__
`
`==_=__=E“__=;=_E=EE=__=__=E“;=;=_E_=____=_____=E“__=;=_E=EE=__=__=E“;=;=_E_=____=_
`
`
`

`
`UNDERDIAGNOSIS & UNDERTREATMENT Continued
`
`because when patients fail to take needed
`medicines as prescribed by their physicians,
`the result is worse health outcomes and higher
`hospital and nursing home costs; in fact,
`nonadherence has been estimated to cost the
`U.S. $100–300 billion annually in avoidable
`health spending and lost productivity.37
`
`An article in the New England Journal of
`Medicine found that DTC advertising is
`concentrated among a few therapeutic
`categories. These are therapeutic categories
`encompassing chronic diseases with
`many undiagnosed sufferers, such as high
`cholesterol, osteoporosis, and depression,
`or therapeutic areas in which consumers can
`often recognize their own symptoms, such
`as arthritis and seasonal allergies.
`
`Nonadherence has been estimated
`
`to cost the U.S. $100-300 billion
`
`annually in avoidable health
`
`spending and lost productivity.37
`
`Patients with one or more chronic diseases
`currently account for 85% of health care
`spending.38 Early and consistent treatment is
`key to controlling this expense. According to a
`study in the Journal of the American Board of
`Family Practice, patients with chronic disease
`were more likely to disclose health concerns
`to their doctors and seek preventive care as
`a result of seeing DTC advertisements.39
`
`Research shows that addressing the
`undertreatment gap can have great benefi ts.
`A 2007 study in Health Affairs examined use
`of high blood pressure drugs and found that
`an additional 89,000 lives could be saved and
`420,000 hospitalizations avoided annually if
`all patients with hypertension were treated
`according to guidelines, on top of the 86,000
`lives already saved and 833,000 hospitalizations
`avoided thanks to these medicines.40
`
`In addition to improved outcomes, reducing
`underuse and increasing adherence to medicines
`can lead to cost offsets. For example, a 2005
`study by MEDCO Health found that every
`additional dollar spent as a result of improved
`adherence to medicines to treat diabetes,
`hypertension, and high cholesterol yields
`savings of $4–$7.41
`
`37 H. Shorter, “Noncompliance with medications: An economic tragedy with important implications for health care reform.” Task Force for Compliance Report, 1993; M.R.
`DiMatteo, “Variations in Patients’ Adherence to Medical Recommendations: A Quantitative Review of 50 Years of Research,” Medical Care 42, no. 3 (March 2004): 200-9.
`38 G. Anderson, analysis, prepared for PhRMA, of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2004.
`39 E. Murray et al., “Direct-to-Consumer Advertising: Public Perceptions of Its Effects on Health Behaviors, Health Care, and the Doctor-Patient Relationship,” The Journal of
`the American Board of Family Practice 17, no.1 (February 2004): 6-18.
`40 D. Cutler, et al., “The Value of Antihypertensive Drugs: A Perspective on Medical Innovation,” Health Affairs 26, no. 1 (January/February 2007): 97-110.
`41 M.C. Sokol et al., “Impact of Medication Adherence on Hospitalization Risk and Healthcare Cost,” Medical Care 43, no. 6 (June 2005): 521-530.
`
`11 THE FACTS ABOUT PHARMACEUTICAL MARKETING & PROMOTION
`
`Page 14 of 24
`
`

`
`PATIENT EDUCATION & EMPOWERMENT
`
`DTC advertising creates awareness of diseases and treatment options
`
`and empowers patients with information.
`
`A major goal of DTC advertising is to inform
`and educate consumers about diseases, their
`
`symptoms, and available therapies. Research
`shows that many patients gain valuable
`
`""1 88% of C3595 When a Patient
`
`information from ads.
`
`asks their physician about a
`
`In fact, an FDA survey released in 2004 found
`
`medicine as a result of seeing a
`
`that in 88% of cases when a patient asked
`their physician about a medicine as a result
`of seeing a DTC advertisement, they had the
`
`condition that the drug treats."
`
`According to a 2007 survey conducted by
`
`KRC Research for the Advertising Coalition,
`
`DTC advertisement, they have the
`Condition that the drug treat5_~42
`
`— FDA Physician Survey, 2004
`
`"advertising for prescription medications
`
`"allow people to be more involved with their
`
`makes people better-informed patients by
`
`healthcare’’ and ’'tell people about
`
`prompting them to seek more information
`
`new treatments.”“‘
`
`about a disease or drug and helping them
`
`recognize that a problem they have can be
`treated." The research found that one in four
`
`consumers—or 59 million Americans—sought
`
`more information after seeing an ad for a
`
`medication and four in five consumers agree
`
`that advertising for prescription medications
`
`can educate people about health conditions
`and treatment Optionsfi
`This point was echoed in Prevention Magazine's
`
`2007 survey, which found that over 70%
`
`of people agree that DTC advertisements
`
`The survey also showed that DTC provides
`
`patients with information about the risks as
`
`well as benefits of medicines. Eighty percent
`
`of patients who see medicines advertised on
`television are aware of the risk information
`
`presented. Half say that they pay "a lot of
`attention" to the risk information. About 66%
`are aware of the benefits of the drug, and
`nearly a third report paying particular attention
`to this information.“
`
`" K. Aikin, J.L Swasy, A.C. Braman, ‘Patient and Physician Attitudes and Behaviors Associated with DTC Promotion of Prescription Drugs — Summary of FDA Survey Research
`Results, Final Report.‘ (Washington, DC: U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, 19 November
`2004) http:IIwww.fda.govlcderIddrnadFinal%20ReponlFRfi nall 1 i9o4.pdr (accessed 30 October 2007).
`‘3 KRC Research,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket